Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

27
Experimental Results from “BigAnt”, a Large Format Antenna for High Quality Geodetic Ground Stations Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA Andria Bilich National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Boulder, CO USA Dmitry Tatarnikov Topcon Positioning Systems Moscow, Russia

description

Experimental Results from “BigAnt”, a Large Format Antenna for High Quality Geodetic Ground Stations. Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA. Andria Bilich National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Boulder, CO USA. Dmitry Tatarnikov Topcon Positioning Systems Moscow, Russia. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

Page 1: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

Experimental Results from “BigAnt”, a Large Format Antenna for High Quality Geodetic Ground

StationsGerald Mader

National Geodetic Survey (NGS)Silver Spring, MD USA

Andria BilichNational Geodetic Survey (NGS)

Boulder, CO USA

Dmitry TatarnikovTopcon Positioning Systems

Moscow, Russia

Page 2: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

Background

• All GNSS antennas sacrifice performance to be man-portable

• Permanent networks can use antennas optimized for performance without regard to size or weight (within reason)

• Thanks to Dmitry Tatarnikov & Topcon we have prototypes to test

Page 3: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

BigAnt

3m

“Standard” Chokering

High-ImpedanceGround Plane

Page 4: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

BigAnt with Radome

Page 5: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

Chokering & BigAnts

34m44m

Chokering BigAnt-2BigAnt-1

Page 6: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

Another View

34m44m

Chokering BigAnt-2 BigAnt-1

Page 7: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

Test SetupReceivers:

• Septentrio AsteRx2eH (tracks both BigAnt-2 & chokering)

• Topcon Net-G3A on BigAnt-1 & BigAnt-2

Page 8: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

Test Plan

• Antenna Calibration for BigAnt• PPP solutions for Chokering & BigAnt • Compare linear combinations & quality factors

Page 9: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

Relative Antenna Calibration Summary

ReferenceAntenna

TestAntenna

44 m

• Get L1 & L2 Phase Center Offsets (PCO) of test antenna with respect to reference• From single differences solve for clock & Phase Center Variation (PCV)• Use absolute calibration for reference to convert test antenna to absolute

Since: geometry removedno troposphereno ionosphereno relative clock

Problems: limited sky coveragepoor coverage at zenithno azimuth solutionmultipath

Residuals show only remaining effect – PCV

Page 10: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

L1

L2

With the positions known, and the relative clocks removed, and with no propagation effects, the phase residuals clearly show the relative PCV as a function of elevation.

These residuals are averaged in 5° bins to produce the PCV that goes into the antenna calibration file.

Single Difference Phase Residuals vs. Elevation

Page 11: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

Absolute Antenna Phase Center Variation (PCV) for BigAnt-1 & D/M_T Choke Ring

The absolute calibration of the choke ring antenna is used to convert the relative calibration of BigAnt into an absolute calibration. The PCVs & PCOs for the standard choke ring and BigAnt (standard choke ring + high impedance ground plane) are shown here.

PCV

(mm

)

Page 12: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

GIPSY PPP – phase residual

Concrete tiles resting on surface

> 200kg

Page 13: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

GIPSY PPP positions - vertical

Weather station 13km away

Concrete tiles resting on surface

> 200kg

Page 14: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

BigAnt Sinking

Day of year, 2014

met

ers

Page 15: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

GIPSY Phase & Range Residual RMS vs ElevationAll Satellites

Phase Range

cmcm

cm m

Chokering Chokering

BigAnt-2

BigAnt-2

Elevation Mar 31 2014 Elevation Mar 31 2014

RMS

Page 16: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

BA2 - CR

Single Difference Phase RMS vs Elevation

All Satellites

RMS

(mm

)

BA2 - CR

BA2 – BA1 BA2 – BA1

L1 L2

BA2 - CR

Elevation June 18 2014 Elevation June 18 2014

RMS

(mm

)

Page 17: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

BigAnt 2 – Choke RingBigAnt 2 – BigAnt 1

DD Phase – PRN 13Ion-Free, Fixed-Integer, Various Reference Satellites

Elevation June 18 2014

DD

Pha

se (m

)

Page 18: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

L1 Range Multipath - PRN 13

BigAnt

Elevation June 18 2014

L1 R

ange

Mul

tipat

h (m

)

RMS = 0.206 mRMS = 0.127 m

Choke Ring

BigAnt

Page 19: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

L2 Range Multipath - PRN 13

RMS = 0.205 mRMS = 0.126 m

L2 R

ange

Mul

tipat

h (m

)

Elevation June 18 2014

Choke Ring

BigAnt

Page 20: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

WIDE LANE - PRN 13RMS = 0.173 cyRMS = 0.099 cy

BigAnt

Choke RingWid

e La

ne (c

y)

Elevation June 18 2014

Page 21: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

SIGNAL / NOISE RATIO - PRN 13

L1

L2

Choke Ring

L1

L2

BigAnt

Time (hr) Mar 31 2014

Page 22: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

RMS = 0.008RMS = 0.005

Kinematic Phase Solution – Up ComponentBigAnt-2 - Choke Ring & BigAnt-2 – BigAnt-1

Time (hr) June 18 2014

RMS = 0.008RMS = 0.005

Up

RMS

(m)

Page 23: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

Corbin

Richmond

Possible Locations for NGS BigAnt

Page 24: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

6” diameter outer piers

12” diameter inner pier

Antenna foundations consists of a single 12-in. diameter center pier (located in the center of a 3.5-ft. radius circle with 8 6-in. diameter support piers evenly spaced along the circumference. All piers are schedule 40 PVC pipe filled with concrete and anchored to subsurface coral.

The antenna foundation final pier heights are yet to be determined but should not exceed 3.0 ft. in height above the surrounding ground surface. The antenna will be fastened onto the foundation piers using 5/8-11-in. threaded rod imbedded in the top of each pier.

�3’

�2-3’

3.5’

Mounting BigAnt

Page 25: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

Step 1

Step 2

Install Chokering on Central Pier. Take

sufficient data.

Assemble High-Impedance Ground

Plane around Chokering

Reference Antenna

Reference AntennaGet L1/L2

phase center positions

Get L1/L2 PCOs & PCVs

BigAnt Calibration

Page 26: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

Last Words• Improved SNR – L1: < 30°– L2: 10°– 90°

• Phase & Range multipath significantly improved• Implications

– Down-weighting low elevation data– Tropospheric solutions (vertical)– Interchannel range bias– Ionosphere solutions– Clock solutions

• Further testing is planned• Poster Paper – Wednesday 11:00

Page 27: Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver Spring, MD USA

Thank You !

Time for comments / questions ?