George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should...

12
George Swallow

Transcript of George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should...

Page 1: George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should these be combinable with all other identifiers that.

George Swallow

Page 2: George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should these be combinable with all other identifiers that.

Current Status: Two formatsGlobal-ID as per RFC5003ITU Carrier Code

Issue:Should these be combinable with all other

identifiers that need global uniquenessOr should some limits exist on mixing and matching

ITU and IP style IDs?Needs to be sorted for ACH-TLV draftBalance of presentation using “SP-ID” as

placeholder without specifying which one(s)

Page 3: George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should these be combinable with all other identifiers that.

Need IF-ID on TunnelTunnelWorking Label-Switched PathProtection Label-Switched Path

MEP

MIP

Link InterfaceTunnel Interface

Page 4: George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should these be combinable with all other identifiers that.

Node IDs◦ 32-bit ID assigned by operator◦ Need not be an IP Address, but◦ Can be auto-generated from an IPv4 address

Interface IDs◦ Logical Interface Handle

32-bit ID that is assigned from a space local to a particular node

◦ IF-ID ::= Node-id::LIH◦ Only needed on tunnels and links

Page 5: George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should these be combinable with all other identifiers that.

Tunnel-ID formed as local{[Sp-ID]::node::tunnel-num}

+remote{[Sp-ID]::node::tunnel-num}◦ Tunnel-num is unique within scope of Node-ID◦ Addresses issue of independent destination tunnel

space◦ Canonical Format of Tunnel-ID

lower ([Sp-ID]::Node-ID) goes first

Page 6: George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should these be combinable with all other identifiers that.

LSP-num – 16 bit identifier as in RFC3209Unique within scope of tunnel

LSP-ID formed as local{[Sp-ID]::node::Tun-ID::LSP-ID}

+remote{[Sp-ID]::node::Tun-ID::LSP-ID}◦ Canonical Format of LSP-ID

lower ([Sp-ID]::Node-ID) goes first◦ Compatible with GMPLS signaling

Page 7: George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should these be combinable with all other identifiers that.

MEP – Maintenance Endpoint◦ Management function associated with an Tunnel,

LSP, or PW endpoint MEG - Maintenance entity group

◦ A set of peer MEPs ME - Maintenance entity

◦ A relationship between two MEPs within a MEG A MEP belongs to one and only one MEG A MEP may belong to multiple MEs

This is normal for P2MP objects

Page 8: George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should these be combinable with all other identifiers that.

TunnelWorking (Label-Switched) PathProtection (Label-Switched) Path

MEP

MEG

ME

Working Path being rerouted

Page 9: George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should these be combinable with all other identifiers that.

TunnelWorking (Label-Switched) PathProtection (Label-Switched) Path

MEP

MEG

ME

Working Path being rerouted

Note: MEG & ME for Tunnel or Protect LSPsnot shown

Page 10: George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should these be combinable with all other identifiers that.

MEG-ID◦ 13 byte character string

MEP-ID ◦ 13 bit-id unique within MEG-ID

Page 11: George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should these be combinable with all other identifiers that.

Tunnels◦ MEG-ID = Tunnel-ID◦ MEP-ID ::= [SP-ID]::Node-ID::Tunnel-num

LSPs◦ MEG-ID – TBD (was = LSP-ID)◦ MEP-ID::= [SP-ID]::Node-ID::Tunnel-num::LSP-

Num

Page 12: George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should these be combinable with all other identifiers that.

Update draft according to this presentation + notes from MEAD team meeting

Working group draft (not necessarily in this order)