GEOPH RPT PROTON MAG RPT WATSON L PROP IRWIN TWP
Transcript of GEOPH RPT PROTON MAG RPT WATSON L PROP IRWIN TWP
42E12NW*ee9 2.14154 IRWIN 010
2,14154
CYRILL PETTIT
GEOPHYSICAL REPORT
PROTON MAGNETOMETER
WATSON LAKE PROPERTY
IRWIN-MCCOMBER TOWNSHIPS
BEARDMORE AREA
RECEIVEDM AY 3 01991
MINING LANDS SECTION
BY: PHANTOM EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD, 103-79 NORTH COURT STREET THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO P7G 5E6
MAY 15, 1991
2.14154 IRWIN 010C
TABLE OF CONTENTS
lNTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
LOCATION AND ACCEiSS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
THEORY OF OPERATION. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
SURVEY PROCEDURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
PRO!ON MAGNETOMETER. . . .. . . ... . . ....2
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...............4
MAPS INCLUDt.D IN THIS REPORT
PROTON MAGNETOMETER (CONTOURED).....l" ~ 2 00'
INTRODUCTION
During the winter of 1991, Phantom Exploration Services
was contracted by Mr. Cyril Petti t of Beardmore to review his
Proton Magnetometer data from his Watson Lake Property in
Northwestern Ontario. The property consists of 1 claim which was
slaked just to the north of an extensive shear zone containing gold
and copper values.
Approximately 1.3 miles of lines were cut at a azimuth
of 062 degrees with the grid lines at 180 degrees. The grid and
surveys were established in order to provided a focus for followup
prospecting in the summer of 1991.
The Surveys were funded by an OPAP grant from the
Ministry of Northern Development arid Mines.
LOCA1ION AND ACCESS
The property is located on the boundary between Irwin
and Mccomber Townships approximately 8.5 kilometres northeast of
the town of Beardmore. The Trans Canada Highway tt 11 and the
Canadian National Railways are located between one and two
kilometres to the southern boundary with the nearest settlement
for- services being the hamlet of Jellico located about 16
kilometres to the east along Highway tt 11. Access is provided by
two wheel drive vehicle along the Windigokan road to the end of
Watson Lake and from there by either boat or snow machine.
Of OF 1 L K A "i ION
"i he Proton Magnetometer
l he Proton Precession Magnetometer is so named because
it utilizes the precession of spinning protons or nuclei of the
hydrogen atom in a sample of hydrocarbon fluid (kerosene) to
measure the total magnetic field intensity.
The spinning protons behave as small, spinning magnetic
dipoles. These magnets are temporarily polarized by application of
a uniform magnetic; field generated by a current in a coil of wire,
when the current is removed, the spin of the protons causes them
to precoss about the direction of the earth's ambient magnetic
field.. Trie processing protons then generate a small magnetic
signal whose frequency is precisely proportional to the total
magnetic field intensity and independent of the orientation of the
coil (sensor). The proportionality which relates frequency to the
field intensity is called the gyromagneti t i c ratio of the proton.
T fie precession frequency, typically 2000 Hz, is measured as the
absolule value of the total magnetic field intensity with an
accuracy of 0.1 gamma.
The total magnetic intensity, as measured by the proton
magnetometer is the magnitude of the earth's field vector which is
independent of its direction. The measurement can be expressed as
a length (50'000 gammas) of the earth's field vector. A local
disturbance, say i O gammas, would add or subtract to the
undisturbed field of 50,000 gammas in the usual manner of vector
addition. Since the proton magnetometer measures only the magnitude
of the resultant vector, (whose direction is almost parallel to the
undisturbed total field vector) that which is measured is very
nearly the component of the disturbance vector. Thus the change in
the total field intensity is called the anomaly.
SURVEY PROCEDURE
The Proton Magnetometer Survey
The Proton Magnetometer Survey was conducted using a
SCINTREX MP-2 PROTON MAGNETOMETER. Data was collected at 100 foot
intervals along the grid lines and then corrected for' any diurnal
variation using the loop method of correction. The corrected data
was then plotted at a map scale of 1=200 ft and contoured at an
interval of 100 garnrnas.
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
The Magnetometer survey was successful in outlining a
weak regional trend cutting across the property from the southwest
to the northeast. The most interesting area of the property is
around the southeast corner and along southern boundary of the
property where a ^00 gamma anomaly occurs. This anomaly is along
the northern flank of a relatively small (700 feet) iron formation
containing magnetite, hematite, chert, etc. ( Gil lick, 1988,
assessment files). Gold values were found in a north-south trending
fault which cuts the major Watson Lake fault and it is the
extension of this cross fault or one similar to it is what holds
the most promise for additional gold mineralization.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1) The PROTON MAGNETOMETER survey was successful in
outlining the northern flank of iron formation on the southeastern
portion of the property .
2) An immediate focal point for exploration would be the
iron formation along the southern boundary of the property and
prospecting for any cross faulting of this trend for a Gearldton
type of gold deposit.
Respectively Submitted,
OQl SI-
1+00 N
WATSON LAKETB 845374
LEGEND TOPOGRAPHIC LEGENDLAKE SHORE ^WZSS&s,?
CLAIH POST B
TOWNSHIP Line - . - - - -. - -
CLAIM LINE —— -- —— -- ——
GEOPHYSICAL LEGENDINSTRUMENT: SCINTREX UP-2 BASE STATION: TIEUNE METHOD ACCURACY: 1.0 nt (CAMHA) CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1M CAMMAS DATJlfHi 69.000 CAtfnS
PROPERjy
'ETOUETER SURVEY
Ministiy of^tern Development
Ontario
DOCUMENT No.
W9140*Report of Work O "l 4 1 42E12NWei009 2-"" si IRWIN gc
Mining ACt (Geophysical, Geolo^l aril Ge*Chemical*Surveys) M^in'g'Tands'section; Mineral Development and L|nds Bran.
Type of Survey(s) j
Recorded Holder(s) y t\
Address A
Survey Company
Name and Address of Author (of
"/^ *" n^CSw\ i
j ' ./2 f i JcA. tn Vjec 1 ^ ^ f ^
Mining Division Township or77 L . fi y' v\ v^\t\K^ \\jC'i*\ t f,
x/tc* w\cJ\ Z (^t^A~-l IMfc *
V? *.Jj^^..L^XC. t? 5s. <Credits Requested per Each/Slaim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Other
Total miles flown over clajmfs)^
Days per Claim
J^gS
X^.o
Days per Claim
Days per Claim
Data - B&MCrtcTHolder or Agent (Signature)
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numericalMining Claim
Prefix
r^Number
//2o9oZ
-
Area
S/AJ X ^/-Prospector's Licence No
Telephone No.
i-ViT - 2ft(o
Date of Survey (from i lo)t/ #3 y/i ^ r'5f e
r/ay | Wo | rvf. \ D .i, f/.- . i
sequence)Mining Claim
Prefix
Ttf
""re
Number
f f lCEi V/HP--I*T f T' i V b It
' '' :') i 1- i
LA,N:-O SL::;
RbUl
AKKl
h/IIMIMO 1 AM
Mining Clai"-
Prefix
J)fl'
:IVE
) 1991
u. .
Nuinbur
- - . .-,,~
D
/\Mirniviiv^i vninL/w WL.VI fWIV
Tola min by t
1 number of ng claims covered fiis report of work. /
Ce/titication VefTtyipg Report rkp ^ - - l hereby certify th^n have a personajymd intimate knowledge o( the facts set forth in this Report of Work, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and annexed reyprt is true.
Name and Address of Person Certifying
For Office Use Only
l
2 . lGEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL
TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT RECEIVED
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT MAY 3FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, O)NC|LIIjSI|QN.g ETC.. 0
Type of Survey__
Township or Area- Claim holder(s) — y* i r P z: r~TI "T
Author of Report. Address A J.
Covering Dates of Survey-
Total Miles of Line cut—(linccutting to office)
X , "^ rtsi j /to t
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
DAYS.-, , . , per claim Geophysical
—Electromagnetic——————Magnetometer___*f L)
—Radiometric————————Other———^-—.———Geological.
Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveyi)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic.{enter days per claim)
Radiometric
HA TP.- AA^ ^ .yy/ SIHM ATT IR V.-. ^ L—— , ,, . ——— ^ j i\ f r S Author qTReport or Agent
PROJECTS SECTION Res. Geol. _______
' /
Qualifications. ZPrevious Surveys
Checked by. .date.
GEOLOGICAL BRANCH.
Approved by. .date.
GEOLOGICAL BRANCH.
Approved by. -date.
M991
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
(prefix) (number)
TOTAL CLAIMS.
Show instrument technical data in each space for type of survey submitted or indicate "not applicable"
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATAt
GROUND SURVEYSNumber of Stations___________k* ^ *Z*ry-t Jfr————— Number of Readings___far CSf (fc* ^Station interval______/ZTJ yLf^f T—-—--^—.--——.————.—-..—-—.-—.——.——-.—-——.Line spacing______^? C^Tv
fProfile scale or Contour intervals_______fi^sCs G* g--(specify for each type of survey)
MAGNETICInstrument ______^C^t riAccuracy - Scale constant————^ Diurnal correction m Base station location
Diurnal correction mpthoH X u g-j t*-///? y /~ ^ l* ** *-————————————
ELECTROMAGNETIC
Instrument———————Coil configuration. Coil separation ——
Accuracy———.—-—Method: d Fixed transmitter n Shoot back O Inline d Parallel line Frequency^-—-——————-—————-—^—^-.——-.——.—.—.—.—.——.———..—————.————-———---
(specify V.L.F. station)
Parameters measured-———————^—^^-—-————-————--—.—.--—--——-———-————-——.^^——.-—-GRAVITY
Instrument.
Scale constant.Corrections made.
Base station value and location.
Elevation accuracy—-—-—————————.———.INDUCED POLARIZATION - RESISTIVITY
Instrument.—.————————^^—————.Time domain___________________________ Frequency domain. Frequency_____________________________ Range——————— Power..,______________________________________.———Electrode array—— Electrode spacing. Type of electrode.
SELF POTENTIAL
Instrument.——————————————————————————————————————— Range. Survey Method.—————————————————————————————————————————————
Corrections made.
RADIOMETRIC
Instrument ———Values measured.Energy windows (levels) -——-———--^-—-—-—---—-——--————————-^^^-—^-—^Height of instrument___________________________Background Count.Size of detector^---————--——————.——---————————-^————-—-.————..^^^—.Overburden ——-—————————————^^^-^—————————--———.——.—
(type, depth — include outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)
Type of survey———————————————————————————————————Instrument ———————————.——————.—.—-——.—.—-—..—.Accuracy——^.^—..^————-^.—-——....——^——^—.——.—..——...——..—Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYS
Type of survey(s)———— Instrument(s) ——————
(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy————————————————.
(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used——-^-————^^^-^——————^^——-^^—.—-—
Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude_________________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight————————
Method of Collection—————————
Soil Horizon Sampled- Horizon Development. Sample Depth————Terrain-———————
Drainage Development____________ Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent
p. p. m. p.p. b.
D D D
Cu, Pb,
Others.—
Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)
Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used__
Field Laboratory Analysis No.(_______.
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis———.
Extraction Method. Analytical Method - Reagents Used——
Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory —. Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used ————-
.tests)
.tests)
.tests)
General- General .
PIFHER TWR - G-141
N-
Q::5i-
GC QZ'
^f^S^S'x^
167551 16734 0 O' *f ei.V.| y,, 72 j? c , B03383
7855"7 ,7B5IiHO ,?S?3?7 i768747 17"******.-,?**"***. . - r.-- ...L - --U-.- -( ----l- -.--
- l l '^55^8 l , l 1 007l4j/ l y
,, 1732039 1732040
10 I290S7 29038
602186 V 'f Ni4b47\ (D
08SFZ3 l IOWM4
( 7l824'i . 732
- - 7J83Z '71*3:8**; 171832*.1 * '
1/18304 (718299 f
71 B."31 j 71 BJ237I6323.
l
Ol
O:
CO (TUJ
b
49" 39'BO"
07*15'4ft"
ER TWP - G-166
2.14154 IRWIN 200
TOWNSHIP
IRWIN
i\ \Y*'""V-M.N.R. ADMiNISTRATi'. F
NIPIGONMINING DIVISION ' V • •?2W.')t
THUNDER BAYLAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIViv.TM
THUNDER BAY
IMF INFORMATION fHAF APPEARS ON Tllir. MAP HAS ^FEN COMPIIED FF1OM VARIOUS SOUHCES, AND ACCURACY IS N')T GUARANTEED. THOFu WISHING TO STAKE MIN ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON- fULT WITH THF. MINING RnrORDER, MINISTH' Of7NORIHFRN DEVELOP MF.NT AND MINES, FOR AU DITIONAL INFOHMATIOM ON THE STATUS OF TV' LANDS SHOV;N HFHEON
LEGEND '
('ATI Nil U l ANN
PA r i fin D f OR sum Acr. HK.HI:, ONLYi.iiAKi:LICLNSL O f OCCUPATION
CROWN L AND SAI CS
LOCA1FD l ArjIJ
CANCt'LLLU
MINING nic.Hu; CJNLYUUHfACE MIGHTS O NLY
HIGHWAY A ROUTE MO.
ROADS
l O.
;;;.
l cc.o.
n.o. 11,0,
RAILWAYS
POWER l.INC
^ OR
'ur,"ij v n\y w ith r.untmcr recoil locations or when space l'.
SCALE: 1 INCH " 40 C HAINS
TFFTO 1OO3 7OOP 4000 fiOOO Qo au
l) ^ME TOP r;
mool i A M)
5UOO
Ministryot ' c" dNatural
ResourcesOnta ri
JlC PEBRUARY r;ei
G-164
' TOV/NSHIP
A r. ^ rf"^ ' ^i ?A ''] SO V1"1ill o O'O a vha r-1IRWIN TWP G-164
M.N.R. AOMINISTF9AriVE D lSlrtlCT
: .' ,'JiS'lGON .. MINING DIVISION
'•i" r " J ! 'M p. -'i il '^ A V 4 34 U r.1 V r- it U A I
LAND 1 ITLKS l R EGISTRY DIVISION
f M U ;'!0?: il i? ^
845378.,8911 ^
SUMMER RESORT' LOCATIONS NOT OPEN FQR STAKING 3EC.3KC)
005?3a '006716
HO- INFORMMIIIN IMAI ON THIS MAC
MAS RTPN nOMFMI l li P MOM VAMlOllfl S AND ACUfHACY 1.1 N( 1 1 GIIAHANI IT F li WISHING IO S1AKI Mlf,INC. ci AIM:. SHOIII [t (.ONSUIT Will* THI MHINi. Mf f.OHOI M MINiyiMY 01 NOR T H F. MN Df VI l Ml-MI-NT AMU MINI.:; nm MI
ON THf: SUMIS OfI.ANOS SHOWN HI MI nnri'fo
^r**1—— c. n 'r -T' ..^'m' "-I'' 7 " : -. - r m - .-.-,-i. ,,...fc*066lj ^ ."^•//V--".'''.-
PATtMEU I J OH Ulnl'ACE RIGHIfc ONLY
l. IMiE Mtl. J. H ' .it '. !tMi* 0.
or OCCUPATIONCHOWN LAN? SAUS
i'-;.- \ .|fi?74l4 j 677413
POWER U'.TS
MARSH ORI,"."''U;0
^r.V;v\i :
SCALE; 1 INCH-40 CHAINS
Kitiogo Loke '
'067041 i '0670
Ministryof . Land INcitural Manogement .Resources Branch ,
^SM'^v'/i )RE: AREA -'v !.''^"'. : v,"'. iv r".'.' FEBRUARY 10th, 1981
'-^. •;.'l"''' •'••'-l J'. '.' ..j'. '. . - 1 ' " !