Genotype x Management Interaction in Wheat - Do Genotypes Adapted to CA Make Difference - Rajbir...
-
Upload
csisa-project -
Category
Documents
-
view
95 -
download
0
Transcript of Genotype x Management Interaction in Wheat - Do Genotypes Adapted to CA Make Difference - Rajbir...
Genotype x management interaction in wheat: Genotype x management interaction in wheat:
Do genotypes adapted to CA make difference? Do genotypes adapted to CA make difference?
By By
Rajbir YadavRajbir Yadav
PS, Division of Genetics,PS, Division of Genetics,
IARI, New Delhi IARI, New Delhi
Issues related to viability of agriculture Issues related to viability of agriculture
Profit = (Yield X Price) Profit = (Yield X Price) –– CostsCosts
High ProfitsHigh Profits
•• Obtain the highest possible yieldObtain the highest possible yield
•• With the lowest possible costsWith the lowest possible costs
•• Market at the best possible priceMarket at the best possible price
Yield =Genotype X Environment X Management
Genotype
Yield potential, disease resistance,
lodging,
Environment
Rainfall, sunlight, temperature, day
length, etc.
Management
Cropping system, Fertility, planting,
pest
How to increase yield: Basic plant physiology
• Good stand establishment and early growth
Vegetative growth (leaves and stems) foundation
• for grain growth
• Cool temperature favors vegetative growth : plant
accordingly
• Highest yields w/ high biomass w/ optimum
proportion of grain (Harvest Index ~45%)
• Balancing source (leaves) and sink (florets)
• Reproductive phase (4 leaf to anthesis) most
critical in determining yield (seeds/area)
• Minimize stress during this stage
Sustainability:
Rainfed and irrigated agriculture has
contributed significantly toward increasing
production but concern has been raised for
their sustaiability and efficient use of
water and land resources
Declining return
Degrading natural resources
Polluting environment
Changing environment Changing environment
Uncertain weather
Very high or low precipitation
Very high or low temperature
Prolonged or shortened winter
All these issues can be addressed simultaneously by
practising CA
The global area currently under CA is reaching 120 M ha,
corresponding to about 8.5% of arable cropped land,
spread across all continents and agro-ecologies (Kassam
et al., 2012).
Conservation Agriculture
Comprises three basic component
(1) Retaining full or as close as possible full
ground cover
(2) No soil compacting and disturbance
(3) Maintaining diverse crop rotations.
Implications for crops in
conservation agriculture
● New diseases ( more soil
borne diseases)
● More challenging seed bed
● Weed competition
● Changes in nitrogen
dynamics
● Tillage x cultivar interaction
Breeding for cropping system and conservation Breeding for cropping system and conservation
agriculture agriculture
�� To exploit genotype x tillage interaction for To exploit genotype x tillage interaction for developing varieties for resource conservation developing varieties for resource conservation agriculture.agriculture.
�� To exploit genotype x system interactions (G x S) for To exploit genotype x system interactions (G x S) for developing varieties for specific cropping systemdeveloping varieties for specific cropping system
�� To insulate the varieties for biotic and abiotic stresses To insulate the varieties for biotic and abiotic stresses encountered in different wheat based cropping system encountered in different wheat based cropping system
�� To develop wheat varieties suppressing weeds via To develop wheat varieties suppressing weeds via changed plant morphology.changed plant morphology.
�� Integration of MAS in achieving the various breeding Integration of MAS in achieving the various breeding objectives objectives
Breeding for cropping systemBreeding for cropping system
Three cropping system being addressed under Three cropping system being addressed under
this projectthis project
�� RiceRice--wheatwheat
�� MaizeMaize--wheatwheat
�� BajraBajra--wheat wheat
Composition of the material used for Composition of the material used for
Genotype x Tillage interaction Genotype x Tillage interaction
�� 72 top yielding genotypes from maize72 top yielding genotypes from maize--wheat wheat
zero till raised bed.zero till raised bed.
�� 115 top yielding genotypes from 115 top yielding genotypes from
conventionally tilled maize conventionally tilled maize ––wheatwheat
�� 102 top yielding lines from Zero tilled Bajra102 top yielding lines from Zero tilled Bajra--
wheatwheat
�� 55 top yielding lines from rice55 top yielding lines from rice--wheatwheat
Performance of lines selected from maizePerformance of lines selected from maize--wheat (PB) in wheat (PB) in
different cropping system different cropping system
Performance of ten highest yielding lines of MW across
different production environment
MaizeMaize--wheat (FIRB and zero tillage)wheat (FIRB and zero tillage)
MaizeMaize--wheatwheat
MaizeMaize--wheatwheat
Growth under Zero till ( MaizeGrowth under Zero till ( Maize--
wheat)wheat)
MaizeMaize--wheat (Weed Competitive wheat (Weed Competitive
Genotype)Genotype)
Scientists from Australia and Scientists from Australia and
CIMMYTCIMMYT
Growth of CSW1 under Zero Growth of CSW1 under Zero
tillage in Maizetillage in Maize--wheat wheat
CSW02 CSW02
Study on genotype x tillage interaction in MWStudy on genotype x tillage interaction in MW
Entry
no Pedigree
Yield
per
plot
Yield (
Q/ha)
Per cent
superiority
over check Selection from
153 VL 349/YSCN08 3.7 62.03 8.82 MW ZT
172 VL 849/ UP 2571 3.8 63.71 11.70 MW ZT
178 UP 2425/ UP 2626 3.8 63.71 11.76 MW ZT
272
CL 1449/ HUW
585 3.9 65.39 14.70 MW ZT
328
HD 2687/ PBW
498 3.9 65.39 14.70 MW ZT
774
HW 4023/DW
1326 4 67.06 17.64 MW ZT
803 HW4023/HD 2824 3.7 62.03 8.82 MW ZT
Check
Best plot of 3
checks 3.4 57.08 0.0 -
CSW 18 in MaizeCSW 18 in Maize--wheat( PB)wheat( PB)
View of CSW18 ear headView of CSW18 ear head
FIRB for water saving FIRB for water saving
FIRB for water saving FIRB for water saving
�� Time taken for irrigating 41.40 x 12 m2 blockTime taken for irrigating 41.40 x 12 m2 block
FIRBFIRB 1818
Flat bedFlat bed 2222
Percent saving over flat bed : 18
Incidence of termite in maize Incidence of termite in maize
stubblesstubbles
Incidence of termite in maize Incidence of termite in maize
during 2009during 2009
Crop Crop Zero tillage Zero tillage CTCT
MaizeMaize 4545 2525
BajraBajra NilNil --
Incidence of termite in maize Incidence of termite in maize
during 2010during 2010
Crop Crop Zero tillage Zero tillage CTCT
MaizeMaize 1515 2525
BajraBajra NilNil 0505
RWRW NilNil NilNil
View of View of BajraBajra Field sown under Field sown under
zero till conditionzero till condition
Hybrids of Hybrids of BajraBajra adapted to zero adapted to zero
till conditiontill condition
�� No of hybrids sown No of hybrids sown
�� ArjunArjun Best under CTBest under CT
�� Maharaja 52Maharaja 52
�� PS 999PS 999
�� PS 9444 APS 9444 A Best Under Zero tillageBest Under Zero tillage
�� PS 9444PS 9444
�� Krishna 68Krishna 68
BajraBajra--wheat sowing wheat sowing
BajraBajra--wheat ( Zero tillage Raised wheat ( Zero tillage Raised
Bed with residue)Bed with residue)
Weed competitive genotypes under Weed competitive genotypes under
bajrabajra--wheatwheat
Growth under Growth under BajraBajra--wheat ( wheat (
Zero tillage)Zero tillage)
Growth of CSW1 under Growth of CSW1 under BajraBajra--
WheatWheat
Performance of lines selected from BW in different Performance of lines selected from BW in different
cropping systemcropping system
Performance of entries in Performance of entries in BajraBajra--
wheat wheat
Entry No.
Yield per
plot Yield (q/ha) % superiority over check
2005 HD 2878/HD 29 3.8 63.71563 11.76471 MW
2063 SAWSN14 3.7 62.0389 8.823529 MW
2076 PBW 502/UP2425 3.6 60.36217 5.882353 CT
2077 HD 2824/DW1278 3.7 62.0389 8.823529 BW
2096
HW 5015/HD
2643//PBW343 3.7 62.0389 8.823529 BW
Check Best plot 3.4 57.00872 0
Growth under Growth under BajraBajra--wheat ( Zero wheat ( Zero
till)till)
RiceRice--wheat with rice residuewheat with rice residue
RiceRice--wheat with rice residuewheat with rice residue
Growth of Wheat under very high Growth of Wheat under very high
load of rice residueload of rice residue
Performance of lines selected from RW in different Performance of lines selected from RW in different
cropping systemcropping system
Performance of entries under RWPerformance of entries under RW
Entry No.
Yield per
plot Yield (q/ha)
Per cent
gain
Syste
m
2291 HD 2824/VL 849 3.7 58.730 2.78MW
ZT
2359 HD 2329/ CL 1555 3.7 58.730 2.78 CT
2368 VL 849/ UP 2571 3.8 60.31 5.56 CT
2375 UP 2425/UP 2626 3.7 58.73 2.78 CT
2379 HD 2448/DW1305 3.7 58.73 2.78 CT
6017 HD 2329/HD 2285 3.7 58.73 2.78 RW
6040 HD 2824/HD 2643 3.7 58.73 2.78 RW
6051 HD 2824/HD 2329 3.7 58.73 2.78 RW
Check Best plot of check 3.6 57.0 0.0MW
ZT
Conventionally tilled Flat BedConventionally tilled Flat Bed
Conventional tillage ( MaizeConventional tillage ( Maize--wheat)wheat)
Conventionally tilled wheat on Conventionally tilled wheat on
Flat BedFlat Bed
Conventionally tilled wheat on Flat BedConventionally tilled wheat on Flat Bed
Entry No. Pedigree
Yield
(2010-
11)
Yield
(q/ha)
% superiority over
check
4389
HD
2329/WR544//PBW
343/NW 5041 4.3 62.86 13.15 MW ZT
4354 HD 2878/MC10 4 58.47 5.26 MW ZT
4436 CL1579/HD 2329 4 58.47 5.26 CT
4378 UP2425/CL1482 3.8 55.55 0 MW ZT
4356 HD 2878/HD 29 3.8 55.55 0 MW ZT
4476 IBYT(2006-07) 4 58.47 5.26 CT
Check Best plot 3.8 55.55 0
Performance of lines selected from CT in different cropping Performance of lines selected from CT in different cropping
system system
MaizeMaize--wheat ( Raised Bed wheat ( Raised Bed
Conventionally tilled)Conventionally tilled)
Performance under CT raised Performance under CT raised
bed bed Entry
no
Pedigree Yield
/plot
Yield in
q/ha
Per cent
gain over
best plot
System
from
which
picked
1716 VL 349/YSCN 08 3.3 55.33 10 CT
1712 PBW 343/HUW567 3.2 53.65 6.66 CT
1747 VL 616/Inqlab//Kundan 3.1 51.97 3.33 CT
1867 CL1705/HD 2894 3.1 51.97 3.33 RW
1666 UP 2425/CL 1461 3 50.30 0 MW ZT
1667 UP 2425/UP 2626 3 50.30 0 MW ZT
Cross over type Genotype x CS Cross over type Genotype x CS
interaction interaction
Performance of CSW entries under multi location Performance of CSW entries under multi location
Name of
the entry
Karnal Kushina
gar
Begu
Sarai
CoochBi
har
Ludhian
a
New
Delhi
Shikopu
r
Mean
CSW15 5753 5410 6245 - 5860 5772 5867 5818
CSW16 5760 6330 5864 - 5904 5762 5931 5925
CSW18 5938 6170 6183 - 6100 5823 5842 6009
CSW1 5470 5440 6027 - 5942 5650 5791 5719
DBW 17 5513 4215 5182 - 5404 5293 4656 5043
PBW 343 5750 5550 4934 - - - - 5411
HD 2967 - 4250 6108 - 6463 5150 5153 5425
PBW 550 5780 3669 5164 - 3667 5163 3907
Sarpat 4913 3740 5125 - - - - 4592
Rubi 6163 3747 5508 - 5606 - - 5256
Munal 6471 6451 5552 4075 6495 - - 5809
Well filled cob under zero till Well filled cob under zero till
condition condition
Maize hybrid under zero tillage Maize hybrid under zero tillage
Problem under zero tillage Problem under zero tillage
Hybrids adapted to zero till Hybrids adapted to zero till
conditioncondition
Name of the
entry
Plot
yield
Yield (
q/ha)
Cob
length
No of
rows
Kernels
per row
ZT09 15.5 49.20 22 12.7 45.3
ZT1 14 44.44 16 13.7 41.7
ZT154 14 44.44 17 13.3 34.3
ZT110 13.8 43.80 18 15.0 36.7
ZT45 13.5 42.85 18 15.7 36.3
ZT165 12 38.09 18 13.3 37.0
Hybrids adapted to CTHybrids adapted to CT
Name of
the entry
Plot yield
in Kg
Yield
( q/ha)
Cob
lengthNo of
rows
Kernels
per row
CT 503 6 42.8 19 13.3 36.3
CT 234 5.5 39.2 18 12.7 39.3
CT 217 5.5 39.2 17 12.3 38.3
CT 606 5.5 39.2 20 13.3 39.3
CT 246 5.5 39.2 16 13.0 42.7
Exploring possibility of CSW 18 by early sowingExploring possibility of CSW 18 by early sowing
HD 2329 HD 2329 vrn A1 Vrn B1 and VRN D1vrn A1 Vrn B1 and VRN D1
CSW 18: CSW 18: vrnA1, VrnB1 and vrn D1vrnA1, VrnB1 and vrn D1
Growth under Zero tilled Growth under Zero tilled
conditioncondition
RiceRice--wheat fieldwheat field
Genotype x cropping system interaction in 2009Genotype x cropping system interaction in 2009
Name of the check DBW 17 PBW 550 HD 2967
No of replications 30 30 30
Range of yield per plot 1910 -2600 772-1880 1160-2350
Average yield per plot 2156.66 1256.56 1862.66
Standard error 224.86 275.25 275.35
Yellow rust infection in PBW343Yellow rust infection in PBW343
Conclusion:Conclusion:
�� Selection under maizeSelection under maize--wheat (PB) were also wheat (PB) were also
good for CT (FB) also but not vicegood for CT (FB) also but not vice--versaversa
�� Selection under BajraSelection under Bajra--wheat were also good wheat were also good
for maizefor maize--wheat.wheat.
�� Selection under RW were equally good for Selection under RW were equally good for
MW and CT(FB)MW and CT(FB)
�� Strong Genotype x System interaction in bad Strong Genotype x System interaction in bad
years. Is it consistent over the yearsyears. Is it consistent over the years
�� Can we go varietal release: Can we go varietal release: No harm No harm
Trait Recent evidence
Coleoptile length Trethowan et al (2001); Rebetzke et al
(2004 & 2007); Erayman et al (2006)
Coleoptile thickness Rebetzke et al (2004)
Emergence from depth Trethowan et al (2005); Joshi et al (2007)
Rapid height growth Olesen et al (2004)
Seedling vigour Liang and Richards (1999); Trethowan et
al (2005); Erayman et al (2006)
Kernel weight & embryo size Liang and Richards (1999)
Faster stubble decomposition Joshi et al (2007)
Weed suppression & Allelopathy Olesen et al (2004); Bertholdsson, 2005
Early biomass/specific leaf area Liang and Richards (1999); Olesen
et al (2004)
Deeper roots Reynolds and Trethowan (2007)
N-use efficiency Van Ginkel et al (2001); Trethowan et al
(2005)
Disease resistance Trethowan et al (2005); Joshi et al (2007)
Seedling temperature tolerance Boubaker & Yamada (1991); Dell’Aquila
and Spada (1994)
Traits important for conservation agriculture
Crosses among lines with
contrasting responses under zero-
tillage
Always selected under zero-tillage
alternating between rainfed and
irrigated conditions
Always selected under
conventional tillage alternating
between rainfed and irrigated
conditions
Advanced lines from both selection
regimes evaluated under both zero
and conventional tillage
According to Sayre and Trethowann
Thanks For Your Kind
Attention