Generative Grammar(Part ii)

25
GENERATIVE GRAMMAR(PART II) Lecture # 14

description

Lecture # 14. Generative Grammar(Part ii). Review of lecture 13. Generativism is a rule governed creativity. We produce utterances with a certain grammatical structure. Generativism different from Bloomfieldian and Post- Bloomfieldian structuralism. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Generative Grammar(Part ii)

Page 1: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

GENERATIVE GRAMMAR(PART II)

Lecture # 14

Page 2: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Review of lecture 13

Generativism is a rule governed creativity.

We produce utterances with a certain grammatical structure.

Generativism different from Bloomfieldian and Post-Bloomfieldian structuralism.

They emphasized on the structural diversity

Generativists interested in similarities in languages

Page 3: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Review of Lecture 13

Human language faculty is innate and species –specificPerformance – language behaviour determined not only by competence but also other factors

Competence-performance distinction at the heart of genertivism

The distinction similar to langue-parole

Identifiable difference on the basis of syntax

Page 4: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative Grammar

Generate doesn’t relate to any process of sentence production in real time

A generative grammar is a specification of the grammatical structure of the sentences it generates

Generative grammar allows for the existence of many different kinds of generative grammar.

Page 5: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar

Some kinds of generative grammar – more powerful than others

They can generate all the formal languages which other less powerful grammars can generate and others that less powerful grammars can’t

Three types : Finite state grammar, Phrase structure grammar & transformational grammar (the most powerful)

Page 6: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar

Grammar of a particular language is a system of rules & principles that link sounds and meaning

Here he is taking the native speaker’s ability to perform another kind of interpretation , by which phonetic representations are converted into sound and the semantic into meaning.

Page 7: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar

The missing links are supplied by general theory of linguistics – called ‘universal grammar’ by Chomsky

Chomsky believes that language particular grammars are generative devices whose role is to relate semantic representations and phonetic representations

Page 8: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar

They operate with the same kind of semantic and phonetic primes; (cognitive correlate)

This helps in interpreting native speaker’s ability and knowledge of universal grammar.

Chomsky thinks that human beings are endowed with a number of special faculties (mind)

Page 9: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar

The faculties play an important role in our acquisition of knowledge and enable us to act as free agents

We are then free from the interference of external stimuli in the environment.

In this aspect he is opposite to Bloomfield and near to Jacobson.

Page 10: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar

Chomsky says that there are certain phonological, syntactic and semantic units that are universal

They are not necessarily present in all languages but they can be defined independent of their occurance in any particular language.

Page 11: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar

They can also be identified when they occur in particular languages

Example: It is held that there is a fixed set of up to twenty features of phonology.

The feature of voicing that distinguishes /p/ from /b/, /t/ from /d/ in pronunciation of the English words pin and bin or ten and den.

Page 12: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar

Another example: the feature of nasality that distinguishes /b/ from /m/ or /d/ from /n/ in bad and mad or pad and pan

Not all of them present in phonemes of all languages but from their various variations (possible combinations) every language will make its own selection

Page 13: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar

Similarly at syntactic level, syntactic categories such as ‘noun’, ‘verb’, or ‘past tense’ or such components of meaning of words as ‘male’ or physical object belong to fixed set of elements.

In terms of this it is possible to describe the syntactic or semantic structure of all languages

Page 14: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar

These phonological, syntactic and semantic elements are called ‘Substantive universals’

Chomsky believes formal universals determine the form of the rules and the manner of their operation in the grammars of particular languages

Transformations which relate various sentences and constructions are structure dependent

Page 15: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar

They are structure dependent because they apply to strings of words through organization of these words into phrases.

Language should not make structure independent operations in order to relate one sentence type to another

Ahmad was here yesterday? (declarative) Was Ahmad here yesterday? (interrogative)

Page 16: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar

Bloomfieldians nearer to transformation

grammar. They say, “Every language is a law

unto itself” Chomsky says that the grammatical

similarities between widely separated and historically unrelated languages are as important as their differences.

Page 17: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar

Recent syntactical analysis of a number of languages shows that similarities are deeper and differences are superficial

All languages are similar in their deep structure than they are in their surface structure.

Specific conditions govern the operation of grammatical rules in all languages.

Page 18: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar

By means of these conditions rules can be determined and formalized

Results All human languages are similar in

structure. All human languages make reference

to the properties and objects of the physical world which is perceived in the same way physiologically and psychologically.

Page 19: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar All languages operate in culture. Language fulfills a similar range of

functions. It refers to Chomskyan view, ‘ human

beings are genetically endowed with a highly specific language faculty.

This faculty determines universal features as structural dependency.

Page 20: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar

All children regardless of race and parentage are born with the same ability for learning languages

In normal circumstances children will grow up as native speakers of the language, which they hear around them. Chomsky states, “ A child learns those utterances which he has never heard”

Page 21: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Generative grammar

The child is born with a knowledge of the highly restrictive principles of universal grammar.

Page 22: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Summary

Generative grammar is set of rules which, operating upon a finite vocabulary of units , generates a set of (finite or infinite) strings, which is well formed in the language that is characterized by the grammar.

The word ‘generate’ does not relate to any process of sentence production

Page 23: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Summary

A generative grammar is the specification of the grammatical structure of the sentences that it generates.

Grammar of a particular language is a system of rules & principles that link sounds and meaning

human beings are endowed with a number of special faculties (mind)

Page 24: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Summary

Chomsky says that there are certain phonological, syntactic and semantic units that are universal.

Human beings are independent of any external stimuli

All human languages are similar in structure.

All human languages make reference to the properties and objects of the physical world

Page 25: Generative  Grammar(Part  ii)

Summary

grammatical similarities between widely separated and historically unrelated languages are as important as their differences.