General Student Affairs Committee: 2014-15 Annual Report

Committee chair:  Pamela Dusschee, SBA Committee Members:  DeLys Ostlund, WLL; Erik Geschke, ART; Dawn Schneider, SHAC; Arun Rana, CEE; Douglas Beyers (Student); James Schofield (Student); Brian Reverman (Student).

This committee is charged by the Faculty Senate to: 1) Serve in an advisory capacity to administrative officers on matters of student affairs,educational activities, budgets and student discipline. 2) Have specific responsibility to review and make recommendations regarding policies related tostudent services, programs and long‐range planning, e.g., student employment, educational activities, counseling, safety, health service and extra‐curricular programming 3) Nominate the recipients of the President’s Awards each spring term

The committee met three times throughout the year.  Spring term will be dedicated to the review of nominations and selection of the President’s Awards.   

After a meeting with Interim VP EMSA, Dan Fortmiller, the committee decided to address PSU’s progress towards Title IX and Safe Campus. In particular, assessing the Safe Campus Module and student participation. In addition, the committee decided to collect information from various campus stakeholders to assess progress and identify in potential gaps. 

Advisory capacity:  The committee was not contacted for advisory services. However, the committee did meet with the Interim EMSA VP to solicit potential areas to assess. 

President’s Awards:  In Spring 2014, the committee participated in the review and selection of the President’s Awards.  The process will be the same this year, with the review being conducted in spring term.  The committee now selects the “best of the best” awards from amongst the winners for each college/school for Academic Achievement, Community Engagement and University Service for the undergraduate, master’s and doctoral levels in each category.  

Review and recommendation capacity:  PSU progress towards Safe Campus

ACTIONS completed: Met with Interim VP EMSA, Dan Fortmiller to discuss potential focus areas. Met with President Wim Wiewel to learn about PSU’s Administration’s commitment to Title

IX. President Wiewel indicated that he felt PSU is doing a good job relative to complianceand response, but that there could be more work in prevention and awareness.

Committee members met with various PSU Stakeholders, Julie Caron, Office of Equity &Compliance; SHAC staff; two members of the Sexual Assault Task Force; Director ofCounseling Services; and Women’s Resource Center Advocate.

Committee members reviewed the student Safe Campus Module. Committee members reviewed the U.S. President’s Report – “Not Alone.” Invited guest, Julie Caron from Office of Equity & Compliance to give a review of current

campus initiatives.

G-1

ACTIONS to be taken in spring term: Meet with new VP EMSA, John Fraire to review findings and assess alignment with

committee  Outreach  to faculty to participate in bringing awareness to Safe Campus initiatives Formalize advisory to PSU on committee findings

RECOMMENDATIONS to 2015‐16 committee chair:   Build engagement with EMSA and other PSU stakeholders to ensure General Student Affairs

Committee adds value to PSU Mission.  Stakeholders across campus have been working hard to create awareness around sexual

assault on campus. The committee should continue its work around Safe Campus, including summarizing activities and making recommendations for next actions that bring awareness to these efforts. 

Work with EMSA to promote student awards, in addition to nominating students for thePresident’s Awards. 

To learn more about the Safe Campus module for students, visit: 

http://www.pdx.edu/sexual‐assault/safe‐campus‐module 

G-­‐2  

1  

Intercollegiate  Athletics  Board  (IAB)  

Annual  Report,  April  2015  

Members  2014-­‐15  academic  year  

Chair:  Randy  Miller,  PSC  Toeutu  Faaleava,  UNST  Robin  Beavers,  ADM  Michael  Smith  ED  (Added  November  2014)  Antoinette  Wayne,  Student  

Ex-­‐officio  Members  Professor  Robert  Lockwood,  C&CJ  and  NCAA  Faculty  Athletics  Representative  Mark  Rountree,  Athletics  Director    (Began  January  2015)    Valerie  Cleary,  Senior  Associate  Athletics  Director/Senior  Woman  Administrator  in  Athletics  (Left  PSU  April  2015).  Matt  Billings,  Deputy  Athletics  Director  Wim  Wiewel,  President  

The  Intercollegiate  Athletics  Board  is  charged  by  the  Faculty  Senate  to:  1) Serve  as  the  institutional  advisory  body  to  the  President  and  Faculty  Senate  in  the  developmentof  and  adherence  to  policies  and  budgets  governing  the  University’s  program  in  men’s  and  women’s  intercollegiate  athletics;  2) Report  to  the  Faculty  Senate  at  least  once  each  year.

I.      Athletic  Department  Staff  changes  

• Mark  Rountree  (Deputy  Athletics  Director  at  Miami  University  of  Ohio)  Mark  began  on  January  20,2015.    Mark  has  spent  his  first  few  months  learning  the  strengths  of  the  staff  before  making  toomany  substantive  changes  to  the  Athletics  Administration.    He  has  recently  submitted  a  revisedOrganizational  chart  for  the  Athletics  Department

• Head  Women’s  Basketball  Coach  Sherri  Murrell  was  let  go  from  the  University  in  late  February  andLynn  Kennedy  was  named  the  head  coach  last  week.    Coach  Kennedy  comes  to  Portland  State  with  14years  experience  as  a  collegiate  head  coach  and  more  than  20  years  coaching  experience  overall.  For  the  past10  seasons,  he  led  the  Southern  Oregon  women’s  basketball  program  to  outstanding  success.  The  Raiderswent  27-­‐5  this  past  season,  ranked  in  the  top  10  in  the  nation,  and  reached  the  NAIA  Division  II  Sweet  16.  Inall,  Kennedy  was  208-­‐105  as  head  coach  at  Southern  Oregon,  leading  three  teams  to  the  NAIA  NationalTournament.

• Associate  Athletic  Director  for  External  Affairs  (Zack  Wallace),  Dan  Valles  (EMSA  office  and  StudentAffairs  budgetary  manger)  and  Associate  Athletic  Director/Senior  Women’s  Administrator  leftPortland  State  for  new  jobs  at  other  institutions.

• Robert  Lockwood  (Faculty  Athletics  Representative)  has  announced  he  will  be  extending  his  termserving  as  the  FAR  until  September,  2015.    The  process  for  selecting  the  next  Faculty  Athletics

G-­‐2  

2  

Representative  failed  to  attract  any  qualified  candidates  during  the  initial  search.    The  position  description  has  been  revised  and  the  position  search  will  reopen  this  month.    Members  of  the  IAB  have  been  encouraged  to  begin  speaking  with  potential  candidates  and  actively  recruit  their  interest  in  this  vital  position.  

II. IAB  Oversight  and  Review  as  Required  under  the  PSU  NCAA  Certification  AgreementOperating  Principle  1.1  (O.P.  1.1-­‐-­‐-­‐Institutional  Control  and  Shared  Responsibilities)  IAB  has  maintained  an  active  role  in  policy  and  procedure  development  and  revision  in  Athletics.  It  has  reported  on  athletic  policy  issues  and  student-­‐athletes’  accomplishments,  and  has  reviewed  Athletics’  budget  requests  submitted  to  the  Student  Fee  Committee  (SFC).  

IAB  approved  the  PSU  Athletics  Academic  Services  Policy  at  its  meeting  on  January  7,  2015.  This  manual  fulfilled  one  of  the  commitments  PSU  Athletics  made  as  part  of  the  OUS  Audit  process.    The  completion  of  this  manual  was  an  important  step  in  PSU’s  rules  education  and  culture  of  Student  Athlete  support  services  in  Athletics.  The  Athletics  Department  has  acknowledges  that  there  may  be  revisions  to  both  the  previously  adopted  compliance  policy  and  this  Academic  Services  policy  as  a  result  of  the  Portland  State  University  internal  audit  and  input  from  new  Athletic  Director  Mark  Rountree.  

III. Discussion  of  concussion  policy

• The  department  of  Athletics  recently  submitted  a  policy  to  guide  the  handling  ofAthletes  who  suffer  a  concussion.  The  policy  will  guide  and  monitor  an  athlete’sreturn  to  participation  and  return  to  academic  work.    Athletics  is  currently  athorough  review  of  this  important  document  by  the  Intercollegiate  Athletics  Board.The  development  of  the  final  language  of  this  document  and  should  be  the  board’sfinal  approval  in  the  next  meeting.

IV. Possible  change  to  the  committee  structure

• Discussion  was  held  to  determine  how  to  make  the  Intercollegiate  Athletics  Board  betterserve  the  needs  of  the  campus  community.    (Do  we  expand  the  number  of  members?,  Dowe  keep  it  as  faculty  only  or  open  the  membership  to  staff  as  well?,  Do  we  include  a  studentathlete  as  a  student  member  in  addition  to  those  students  who  represent  ASPSU?,  Howoften  should  this  body  report  to  the  Faculty  Senate?)  Further  discussion  of  this  has  beenheld  using  a  recent  survey  on  Athletics  governance  from  the  Coalition  on  IntercollegiateAthletics  as  a  guide.

• Further  discussion  remains  as  the  committee  awaits  the  final  report  from  the  internalaudit.    The  Final  report  from  the  auditor  should  be  ready  for  review  at  the  next  IAB  meeting.

Viking  Pavilion  construction:  

G-­‐2  

3  

Meetings  are  ongoing  with  the  architecture  firm  to  develop  the  final  vision  for  the  renovated  facility.    Fortis  Construction  was  chosen  recently  as  the  building  contractor.    Preliminary  estimates  are  for  construction  to  begin  in  mid-­‐December  2015  or  early  January  2016  depending  upon  design  review  and  the  permitting  process.    Anticipated  completion  of  the  project  is  set  for  early  2019  at  the  latest.    When  final  plans  are  confirmed  they  will  be  distributed  to  the  IAB.  

Academic  Progress  Reports  are  due  to  be  released  by  the  NCAA  in  the  next  week  or  two.    The  results  of  PSU  Athletics  scores  will  be  added  to  a  revised  copy  of  this  report  if  they  are  received  in  time.  

Aa  a  last  minute  request  from  Senate  President  Bob  Liebman,  I  was  asked  to  speak  to  the  steering  committee  about  a  request  from  the  Coalition  on  Intercollegiate  Athletics  asking  PSU  to  call  for  a  vote  on  urging  our  congressional  delegates  to  support  the  creation  of  a  Presidential  Commission  on  Intercollegiate  Athletics.    Given  the  short  notice  an  email  was  circulated  to  the  members  of  the  IAB  asking  for  their  input.    The  responses  were  definitely  mixed  and  highlighted  the  need  for  further  discussion  of  this  matter  at  our  next  meeting.    At  this  time  we  cannot  make  any  recommendation  to  the  Faculty  Senate  steering  committee.    

We  are  scheduled  to  meet  next  week  and  we  will  be  sending  an  amended  version  of  this  draft  updating  any  final  decisions  on  subjects  in  this  report.  

   G-­‐3  IAC  Annual  Report  2015  

Institutional  Assessment  Council  Annual  Report  to  the  Faculty  Senate  

April  1,  2015  

The  Institutional  Assessment  Council  (IAC)  Council  welcomed  eight  new  members  for  the  2014/2015  academic  year.    Members  represent  a  wide  range  of  departments  and  programs,  and  have  significant  roles  related  to  assessment  practices  and  policies.  

IAC  Members  2014-­‐2015  Academic  Year:  

Thomas  Bielavitz,  LIB     Leslee  Peterson,  ED  Rowanna  Carpenter,  UNST   Gerry  Recktenwald,  MCECS  Micki  Caskey,  ED   Aimee  Shattuck,  EMSA  Amy  Donaldson,  SPHR     Brandon  Sheldon  (student  representative),  Ps  Robert    Halstead,  OAA     Karen  Strand,  ARTS  Jim  Hook,  MCECS   Janelle  Voegele  (Co-­‐chair),  OAI  Charles  Klein,  ANTH   Erica  Wagner,  SBA  Suzanne  Matthews,  OAI     Vicki  Wise,  EMSA  (Co-­‐chair)  

Lindy  Wortman  (student  representative),  ED  Ex-­‐officio:  

Margaret  Everett,  OGS  Sukhwant  Jhaj,  OAA  Kathi  Ketcheson,  OIRP  Leslie  McBride,  CUPA  IAC  Charge:  

The  Institutional  Assessment  Council  (IAC)  will  promote  and  advocate  for  the  continued  implementation  of  assessment  across  the  campus,  working  closely  with:  Undergraduate  Studies,  Graduate  Studies,  Institutional  Research  and  Planning,  Office  of  Academic  Innovation,  and  Enrollment  Management  and  Student  Affairs.    The  IAC  will  create  principles  and  recommendations  for  assessment  planning  that  are  sustainable  and  learning-­‐focused,  and  provide  counsel  aimed  at  enhancing  the  quality  of  student  learning  through  assessment  activities.  

In  cooperation  with  the  ex-­‐officio  members,  the  Council  will  design  a  framework  for  promoting  assessment  long  term  and  will  provide  guidelines  for  implementation.      It  will  serve  as  the  primary  advisory  mechanism  for  institutional  planning  and  will  coordinate  with  the  assistant  and  associate  deans  group  the  implementation  of  systemic  annual  reporting  by  the  schools  and  colleagues.    It  will  create  an  annual  document  on  the  status  of  assessment  that  will  form  the  basis  for  institutional  reports,  such  as  those  required  by  the  PSU  faculty  senate  and  the  regional  accreditation  body,  NWCCU.  

IAC  Priorities  2014/2015  

The  IAC’s  priorities  were  informed  by  a  two-­‐year  work  plan  approved  by  the  Council  in  April  2014  [Insert  Link  here].    The  plan  incorporated  foundational  IAC  work  during  the  years  2008-­‐2013,  as  well  as  recommendations  created  by  Dr.  Bill  Rickards,  consultant  in  higher  education  research  and  evaluation  [Insert  link  to  Rickards  PSU  visit  and  report  here]  

   G-­‐3  Rickards  recommended  the  following  short-­‐range  priorities:  

(1)  Mapping  current  assessment  practices  across  colleges  and  programs;  

(2)   Engaging   faculty   as   co-­‐investigators   in   questions   stemming   from   real   issues   in   programs   {ex:  retention,  class  size},  as  well  as  initiatives  impacting  curricular  change  (ex:  Provost’s  Challenge,  Flexible  Degrees);  

(3)  Highlighting  assessment  practices  at  program  and  department  levels,  including  exploring  assessment  practices  with  specific  curriculum  content.  

The  IAC  identified  an  additional  short  range  priority:  

(4)  Leading  campus  conversations  on  assessment  communication  cycles  as  a  means  of  sharing  program  curricular   activities,   innovations   and   findings,   preparing   for   program   review,   and   building  documentation  for  reports  as  required  by  the  regional  accreditation  body,  NWCCU.        

These  priorities  formed  the  basis  for  five  goals:  

Goal  1:  Updated  campus  inventory  of  program  assessment  activity  and  outcomes  -­‐  complete  

Led  by  Assessment  Coordinator  Suzanne  Matthews,  a  campus-­‐wide  inventory  of  program  assessment  activity  was  conducted  to  (1)  compare  current  program  assessment  activity  with  findings  from  a  similar  inventory  conducted  in  2009-­‐2010,  (2)  establish  a  baseline  understanding  of  changes  to  program  assessment  activity,  (3)  inform  the  IAC’s  strategic  planning  goals.    

The  Undergraduate  Programmatic  Assessment  Evaluation  (Template  D)  used  in  2009-­‐2010  to  evaluate  program  assessment  activity  was  modified  to  create  a  template  and  rubric  that  formed  the  basis  for  evaluating  current  program  assessment  activity  in  the  colleges  and  academic  programs.    Indicators  of  “established”  program  assessment  activity  are:  

• clearly  defined  program-­‐level  outcomes,• a  plan  for  assessing  each  of  the  outcomes,• strong  indication  that  the  results  from  assessments  are  reviewed  on  a  continuous  basis,• the  inclusion  of  assessment  results  within  decision-­‐making  and  planning  processes,• updated  information  on  department  websites  on  program-­‐level  outcomes  and  curriculum

revisions.

Initial  inventory  results  revealed  progression  in  several  programs  from  early  to  midstage  assessment  activity,  or  midstage  to  established  program  assessment  activity.    Next  steps  are  to  (1)  follow  up  with  departments  for  which  assessment  information  is  missing,  (2)  develop  exemplars  from  “established”  programs,  using  current  media  technologies  to  highlight  the  departments’  perspectives  on  processes  used  and  impact  of  assessment  work,  and  (3)  establish  partnerships  with  programs  for  sustainable  assessment  planning  that  creates  a  added  value  to  departments’  current  initiatives.    

Goal  2:  Updated  campus  inventory  of  program  outcomes  mapped  to  campus  wide  learning  outcomes  (CWLOs)  –  complete  

2

   G-­‐3  This  inventory  mapped  program  level  outcomes  to  one  or  more  campus  wide  learning  outcomes  to  determine  overall  coverage  across  the  colleges.    Next  steps  are  to  (1)  compare  findings  between  2010  and  2015  inventories,  and  (2)  incorporate  strengths  and  gaps  for  each  outcome  into  strategic  planning  for  promoting  assessment  practices  within  specific  curricular  content.  

Goal  3:  Program  assessment  examples  identified  (Departmental,  College,  Provost  Challenge,  Flexible  Degree)  –  80%  complete  

Examples  have  been  identified  from  program-­‐driven  efforts  to  study  and  improve  student  experience,  retention,  success  and  learning  outcomes.    These  include  examples  from  individual  departments,  University  Studies,  Provost  Challenge  outcomes,  and  assessment  in  Enrollment  Management  and  Student  Affairs.    Next  steps  are  to  organize  examples  into  thematic  categories,  create  multimedia  resources,  and  make  these  resources  available  as  part  of  an  institutional  assessment  portfolio,  as  well  as  planning  and  implementation  of  student  learning  assessment  in  Flexible  Degree  projects.      

Goal  4:  Updated  assessment  resources  –  50%  complete  

In  addition  to  program  and  department  exemplars,  print  and  multimedia  resources  are  being  updated  and  are  available  at  http://www.pdx.edu/institutional-­‐assessment-­‐council/resources  

Goal  5:  Accreditation  Report  Standard  Four:  Effectiveness  and  Improvement  draft  -­‐  complete  

Four  IAC  members  participated  on  the  Standard  Four  Subcommittee:  Effectiveness  and  Improvement  for  the  PSU  Year  Seven  Self  Evaluation  Process.    The  report  summarized  assessment  activity  across  colleges  on  the  undergraduate  and  graduate  levels.    

Goal  6:  Draft  proposal:  Assessment  Communication  Cycles  –  50%  complete  

The  IAC  drafted  a  proposal  and  process  for  the  periodic  communication  of  assessment  activity  across  programs  and  colleges.    The  benefits  of  this  process  to  academic  programs  include  creating  an  accessible  record  of  assessment  activity  for  program  improvement,  keeping  assessment  processes  relevant  and  localized  to  department  concerns  and  initiatives,  “telling  the  story”  of  programs  and  colleges  and  their  contribution  to  the  PSU  student  experience,  creating  a  current  repository  from  which  information  can  be  easily  located  and  shared  by  departments  for  purposes  of  educating  prospective  partners,  and  housing  easily  accessed  data  for  purposes  of  internal  or  external  reporting  requirements.    Next  steps:    IAC  subcommittees  will  refine  the  proposal  and  implement  outreach  to  various  segments  of  the  campus  community  for  feedback.  

The  IAC  will  continue  to  work  with  the  Office  of  Academic  Innovation  to  incorporate  feedback  from  faculty,  chairs,  associate  deans  and  deans  on  assessment  strategic  priorities  and  goals.    Additionally,  the  IAC  will  foster  collaborations  with  colleges  to  examine  PSU  education  with  attention  to  student  persistence  and  success,  will  incorporate  multiple  data  sources  as  resources  to  understand  student  learning  at  Portland  State,  and  refine  approaches  to  supporting  programs  in  assessing  educational  initiatives  as  they  emerge.    

3

G-4 To: Faculty Senate Re: Library Committee Annual Report 4/13/2015

Committee Chair: Jon Holt Committee Members: David Bullock, Susan Chan, Maura Kelly, Susan Masta, Brian Turner and Ivan Reihsmann Ex Officio: Thomas Bielavitz, Barbara Glackin, Claudia Weston, and Marilyn Moody

For the 2014-2015 academic year, the Library Committee discussed the following items: 1. Integration of a new library cataloging system2. Initiatives to empower student learning through the library3. Impacts on the library from budget decreases

For the 2014-2015 year, one of the big challenges to the library has been its integration of a new catalog system that began in Summer 2014. Librarians used committee meetings to help PSU faculty understand the challenges as this process was still underway in late 2014 and to help understand why aspects of library service (e.g., the ability to find and order certain books outside of Millar) might be impacted. This integration is now complete (Spring 2015) and service levels have returned and improved.

Discussion of Task Forces to help promote student learning through library, levering library resources to efficiently and economically empower students. More specifically, faculty and library staff shared feedback on textbook reserves, e-reserves, and alternative methods of textbook delivery.

Discussion of the current and upcoming Library budgets, to help faculty members understand the challenges the library faces in maintaining its service levels (e.g., acquisition or book-buying power); in these discussions, faculty members were able to express their concerns about how cutbacks in services might affect their research and teaching.

A plan from 2013-2014 Library Committee (under Holt) to promote a library-faculty questionnaire for graduate students to gather their feedback on library use and resources was cancelled after further discussion, lacking the full support of both faculty and librarians.

In sum, the faculty Library Committee for 2014-2015 has been able to hear about exciting initiatives and work going on within the library; we have also been able to provide our voices, helping shape work and future work that will lead to student success at PSU in both our classrooms and in our library.

Jon Holt Chair, Library Committee Assistant Professor of Japanese World Languages and Literatures

�ScholAnnuSubmi

Chair

Facu

I.

II.

TCRPG

III.

(all p

lastic Standarual Report toitted to Faculty

r: An

ulty: MMScPaRaCoLiLiD

. Comm

Develop aundergradDevelop, undergradAdjudicateUniversityReport to Act, in all Academic

Committ

The committeCommittees, tRegistration, RProvost for AGraduate Stud

Function

petitions can

rds Committ the Faculty y Steering Com

ndrea Price, O

Megan McLauMichele Millercott Broussaraloma Harrisandy Zelick, ourtney Sandnda Liu, SSSane O’Banioomanic Thom

mittee Charg

and recommeduate programmaintain and

duate transcrie undergraduy. the Senate amatters pert Requiremen

ee Member

ee consists oftwo studentsRecords & O

Academic Inndies & Resea

n of the Com

n be found a

S

�

teeSenate

mmittee on Ap

OIA

ughlin, OIA , IELP

rd, CLAS on, CLAS BIO

dler, UHRL S on, LC mas, DOS

ge

end academicm and academd implement ipts. uate student p

at least once ataining to polnts and Curri

ship

f ten faculty and the follo

Operations; Dnovation & Starch.

mmittee

at www.pdx

SC Annual R

ril 8th, 2015 by

Stud

Ex-

c standards tmic transcripprotocols re

petitions for

a year. licy, in liaisoniculum Comm

members, seowing ex-off

Director of Atudent Succe

.edu/registr

Report to the

by Andrea Pric

dent: N

Officio: MNMS

to maintain thpts of the Unegarding acad

r academic re

n with the chmittees, and

elected at largficio member

Advising & Caess; and a des

ration/)

e Faculty Se

ce

None Appoin

Mary Ann BaNicolle DuPoMargaret EveSukhwant Jha

he integrity oniversity. demic change

einstatement

hairpersons othe Graduate

ge by Commirs: Associateareer Servicesignee from t

enate 2014-1

1 | P a g e

nted

arham, ACSont, RO erett, OGS aj, OAA

of the

es to

to the

of the e Council.

ittee on e Registrar foes; Vice the Office of

15

e

or

f

G-5

SSC Annual Report to the Faculty Senate 2014-15

2 | P a g e

A. The committee reviews petitions for all retroactive changes to the undergraduate academic transcript including:

1. Adding of courses2. Withdrawals3. Drops4. Tuition refunds5. Change of grading option6. Extension of incomplete past one year

B. The committee adjudicates petitions for academic reinstatement for any term.

C. The committee makes recommendations to the Faculty Senate on any changes, additions or policies that have impact on the academic transcript or academic/registration deadlines, including grading.

D. The committee is responsible for the academic standing policy and interventions therein such as the registration hold that is applied for undergraduate students on academic warning. Changes to any of these policies must be presented by the SSC and approved by Faculty Senate.

IV. Changes to SSC Process for 2014-15

In order to respect the university’s effort to become more environmentally conscientious, the committee is now reviewing past SSC petitions in the university’s OnBase database system. When a new SSC petition is submitted by a student who has prior SSC petitions on file, these prior petitions are no longer printed and attached to the current SSC petition. Instead the committee is notified to check the OnBase system to review any such prior petitions.

V. Petitions by the Number 2014-15

Petition Type 2014-15 Granted Denied Pending Reinstatement 179 105 (59%) 58 (32%) 16

Refunds 331 235 (71%) 67 (20%) 29

Add/Drop Overall (including add only, simultaneous add/drop, drop only no refund/withdrawals)

363 249 (69%) 84 (23%) 30

Add only 18 18 0 0Incomplete Extension 23 19 (83%) 4 (17%) 0

SSC Annual Report to the Faculty Senate 2014-15

3 | P a g e

TOTAL* Number is lower than sum of above as drops and refunds may be double counted.

728* (down slightly from 2013-14)

VI. Many Thanks!!

Thank you to all committee members for your continued work and support of students. Special thanks to Nicolle DuPont and Liane O’Banion who helped make the transition to the new chair for the 2014-15 year a smooth process. Many thanks to Domanic Thomas and Nicole Morris for your continued willingness to share information relevant to the petition process. And finally a huge thank you to Kalialani Cruz, who works tirelessly to support our committee and the students, as they are finding their way through the petition process.

G-­‐6  2014/2015 UNST Council Report to Faculty Senate

Prepared by Joel Bettridge, Chair

Council membership: Amy Spring, Ben Anderson-Nathe, Betsy Natter, Daneen Bergland, Eleanor Erskine, Jeff Gerwing, Joseph Smith-Buani, Kimberly Willson-St Clair, Melissa Appleyard, Pedro Ferbel-Azcarate, Rachel Webb, Susan Reese, Thomas Szymoniak

Ex-officio: Mirela Blekic, Rowanna Carpenter, Yves Labissiere

The UNST Council membership was not assigned until the end of the Fall term. It then meet three times in the Winter Term and is scheduled to meet four times in the Spring Term. Its activities comprised the following:

1. Curriculum

a. The UNST Curriculum Committee (Chaired by Rowanna Carpenter) reviewed andrecommended a number of courses for inclusion in various clusters. The Council votedto approve their inclusion. The classes and clusters are: CR 306U (approved for a newcluster), INTL 343, INTL 364, JPN 344, CFS 340, HST 333, HST 326, INTL 350, INTL360

b. The Council is currently considering a new Freshman Inquiry theme, titled “Health,Happiness, and Human Right.” This FRINQ is designed to attract/serve students whoare interested in learning about Health Sciences. The Council, however, had majorconcerns with the proposal. In particular, it was not clear how writing instruction wasincorporated into the class, nor was it clear how interdisciplinary the class was inpractice. The Council asked the faculty members proposing the new FRINQ to revisethe proposal and resubmit it by Friday April 17th. The Council’s hope is that its concernswill have been addressed and that the new FRINQ can be approved for next year.

c. The Council approved the reapplication of the Science in the Liberal Arts cluster, whichwill now be titled “Science in Social Context.”

d. The Council is scheduled to meet with the Credit for Prior Learning team in the Springterm.

2. First-Year Experience Review follow up

a. Based upon the findings of the report, the Council decided that it wanted to participatein the University’s strategic planning process, so it scheduled a meeting with the StudentLearning and Academic Success team and Equity, Opportunity and Access team. Thegoal of this meeting was to highlight the student success issues that emerged out of thereport.

a. In the Spring Term, the Council is going to focus on how to improve faculty experiencewithin the Freshman Inquiry. In particular, it is going to decide which areas identified bythe report aught to be prioritized.