GEII ModuleI PartII.ppt - Government Engineering...
Transcript of GEII ModuleI PartII.ppt - Government Engineering...
INDIRECT METHODS
SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (SPT)● Reference can be made to IS 2131 – 1981 for details on SPT.
● It is a field test to estimate the penetration resistance of soil.s a e d es o es a e e pe e a o es s a ce o so
● It consists of a split spoon sampler 50.8 mm OD, 35 mm ID,min 600 mm long and 63 5 kg hammer freely dropped from amin 600 mm long and 63.5 kg hammer freely dropped from aheight of 750 mm.
● Test is performed on a clean hole 50 mm to 150 mm diameter● Test is performed on a clean hole 50 mm to 150 mm diameter.
● Split spoon sampler is placed vertically in the hole, allowed tofreely settle under its own weight or with blows for first 150freely settle under its own weight or with blows for first 150mm which is called seating drive.
Th b f bl i d f th t 300 t ti● The number of blows required for the next 300 mm penetrationinto the ground is the standard penetration number N
● N value is termed as Refusal if 50 blows for any 150 mmpenetration or 100 blows for 300 mm penetration or 10
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
successive blows produce no advance.
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (SPT)
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
CORRELATIONS OF N Denseness φSPT VALUES FOR COHESIONLESS
0 - 4 Very Loose < 28°
4 10 Loose 28° 30° SOILS4 - 10 Loose 28° - 30°
10 - 30 Medium 30° - 36°
30 - 50 Dense 36° - 42°
50 V D 42> 50 Very Dense > 42°
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
CORRELATIONS OF SPT VALUES FOR COHESIVE SOILSCOHESIVE SOILS
2u m/kN
Nq ≈u /N
075.0q
N Consistency qu (kN/m2)
0 - 2 Very soft < 250 - 2 Very soft < 25
2 – 4 Soft 25 – 50
4 – 8 Medium 50 – 100
8 15 Stiff 100 2008 – 15 Stiff 100 – 200
15 – 30 Very Stiff 200 – 400
> 30 Hard > 400
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
CORRECTIONS FOR SPT VALUE
● Correction for Overburden PressureFor Cohesionless soilsFor Cohesionless soils,
N2N2000
log77.0N 10 ≤⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡=′
where q is Effective overburden pressure in kN/m2.
q ⎥⎦
⎢⎣
● Correction for Dilatancy
For fine sand and silt below water tableFor fine sand and silt below water table,
15Nfor)15N(5.015N >′−′+=′′ )(
15NforNN ≤′′=′′
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
ADVANTAGES
● Relatively quick & simple to perform
E i t & ti f t t i id l il bl● Equipment & expertise for test is widely available
● Provides representative soil samplep p
● N is correlated with most properties of soil such as
friction angle undrained cohesion density etcfriction angle, undrained cohesion, density etc.
● Provides useful index for relative strength &
compressibility of soil
● Able to penetrate dense & stiff layers● Able to penetrate dense & stiff layers
● Results reflect soil density, stress strain behavior
● Numerous case histories available
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
DISADVANTAGES
● Requires the preparation of bore hole.
D i ff t i l t d t tl t ti f● Dynamic effort is related to mostly static performance
● Standards regarding energy are not uniformg g gy
● If hard stone is encountered, difficult to obtain reliable
resultresult.
● Test procedure is tedious and requires heavy equipment.
● Not possible to obtain properties continuously with
depthdepth.
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
PROBLEMS● A SPT is conducted in a sand deposit at a depth of 20 m.
Water table is at ground level. If N value is 40, find the corrected Nvalue. Saturated Unit weight of sand is 19 KN/m3. Take γw = 10 kN/m3.
Solution
Correction for overburden pressure
γ’ = γsat - γw = 19 – 10 = 9 kN/m3
q = Eff. Overburden pressure = γ’ D = 9 x 20 = 180 kN/m2
2000⎤⎡= 0.77 x log10 (2000/180) x 40
= 0.805 x 40 = 32.2 ≅ 32 < 2 N
Nq
2000log77.0N 10 ⎥
⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡=′
Correction for dilatancy
= 15 + 0.5 x (32 – 15))15N(5015N −′+=′′ ( )
= 23.5 ≅ 23
Corrected N Value = 23
)15N(5.015N +
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
● A SPT is conducted in a sand deposit at a depth of 20 m.
Water table is at 8m below ground level. If N value is 40, find the corrected NWater table is at 8m below ground level. If N value is 40, find the corrected N
value. Unit weight of sand above water table is 18 KN/m3 and saturated unit
weight of sand below water table is 19 KN/m3. Take γw = 10 kN/m3.
Solution
Correction for overburden pressure
γ’ = γsat - γw = 19 – 10 = 9 kN/m3
q = Eff. Overburden pressure = γ1 D1 + γ’ D2 = 18 x 8 + 9 x 12 = 252 kN/m2
= 0.77 x log10 (2000/252) x NN2000
log77.0N 10 ⎥⎤
⎢⎡
=′= 0.693 N < 2 N
= 0.693 x 40 = 27.7 ≅ 27
qg10 ⎥
⎦⎢⎣
Correction for dilatancy
= 15 + 0.5 x (27 – 15))15N(5.015N −′+=′′= 21
Corrected N Value = 21
)(
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
● A SPT is conducted in a sand deposit at a depth of 20 m.
Water table is at 25m below ground level If N value is 40 find theWater table is at 25m below ground level. If N value is 40, find the
corrected N value. Unit weight of sand above water table is 18 KN/m3
and saturated unit weight of sand below water table is 19 KN/m3 Takeand saturated unit weight of sand below water table is 19 KN/m . Take
γw = 10 kN/m3.
SolutionSolution
Correction for overburden pressure
Eff O b d D 18 20 360 kN/ 2q = Eff. Overburden pressure = γ1 D1 = 18 x 20 = 360 kN/m2
2000⎤⎡= 0.77 x log10 (2000/360) x N
= 0.573 N < 2 N
Nq
2000log77.0N 10 ⎥
⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡=′
= 0.573 x 40 = 22.9 ≅ 22
There is no correction for dilatancy as the water table is below SPT depthThere is no correction for dilatancy as the water table is below SPT depth
Corrected N Value = 22
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
CONE PENETRATION TEST (CPT)
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
STATIC CONE PENETRATION TEST (SCPT)
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
CONE PENETROMETERS
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
Advantages and Disadvantages
● Advantages of SCPT are
C ti i t ith d th i d d– Continuous resistance with depth is recorded.
– Static resistance is more appropriate to determine staticpp p
properties of soil.
C b l t d ith t ti f il– Can be correlated with most properties of soil.
● Disadvantages of SCPT areg
– Not very popular in India.
– If a small rock piece is encountered, resistance shown is
erratic & incorrect.
– Involves handling heavy equipment.
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
LOCATION OF WATER TABLE● Soil strength is usually reduced
below water table.
● Foundations below the watertable will be uplifted by thewater pressure.
● For soils with high permeability,GWT is generally determinedby directly measuring to thestabili ed ater le el in thestabilized water level in thebore hole after 24 to 48 hours.
● For soils with low permeability● For soils with low permeability,install a piezometer with aporous base and a removableporous base and a removabletop cap in the bore hole. GWTis measured periodically until
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
the water level stabilizes.
BORE LOGBORE LOG
● The data obtained
from bore holes,
site observationssite observations
and laboratory
results and
presented in a
chart form known
as Bore logsas Bore logs
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
BORE LOGS
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
SOIL PROFILE
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT
● Introduction gives the scope
● Description of the proposed structure location and● Description of the proposed structure, location andgeological conditions of the site
D t il f th fi ld l ti● Details of the field exploration programme
● Details of the methods of explorations
● General description of the sub soil conditions
● Details of the Lab tests
● Depth of ground water table and changes in water levels
● Discussion of the results● Discussion of the results
● Recommendations about type of foundations, All. Soilil it tpressure or pile capacity, etc.
● Conclusions
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
OTHER IN-SITU TESTS
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
VANE SHEAR TEST (VST)
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
FIELD VANE SHEAR TESTS S
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
FIELD VANE SHEAR TEST
● Best suited for the determination of shear
strength of saturated cohesive soils,strength of saturated cohesive soils,
especially sensitive clays, susceptible for
sampling disturbances.p g
● Torque required to cause the failure is
measured.measured.
∫ τπ×+×τ×π=2/D
rdrr22D
DHT ∫ τπ×+×τ×π=0
rdrr222
DHT
DD 32
τ×π
+τ×π
=6
DH
2
DT
32
⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ +π
=τ
6
D
2
HD
T
2
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
⎠⎝ 62
PROBLEM
● A vane used to test a deposit of soft clay, required a
torque 75 N m The vane dimensions are D = 100 mmtorque 75 N.m. The vane dimensions are D = 100 mm,
and H = 200 mm. Find the value of undrained shear
strength of soil.
Solution
23
mm/N0204601075T ×
τ22
mm/N02046.0
6100
2200
1006D
2H
D=
⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ +×π
=⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ +π
=τ
= 20.46 kN/m2
⎠⎝⎠⎝
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
GEOPHYSICAL METHODS● Technique of determining subsurface materials or stratification of
soils and rocks by measuring some physical property of thematerials, viz. magnetism, density, electrical resistivity orcombination of these properties, and through correlations.
M h i l W M t● Mechanical Wave Measurements– Crosshole Tests (CHT)
D h l T t (DHT)– Downhole Tests (DHT)
– Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves
S i i R f i– Seismic Refraction
– Suspension Logging
● Electromagnetic Wave Techniques– Ground Penetrating Radar
– Electromagnetic Conductivity
– Electrical Resistivity
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
– Magnetometer Surveys
Advantages and Disadvantages
● Advantages
N d t ti– Non destructive
– Fast and economical testingg
– Theoretical basis for interpretation
A li bl il d k– Applicable to soils and rocks
● Disadvantagesg
– No samples or direct physical penetration
– Models assumed for interpretation
– Affected by cemented layers or inclusionsy y
– Results influenced by water, clay and depth
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
SEISMIC REFRACTION METHOD
● General soil types & depth of different strata are judged.
● Shock or seismic waves are created by detonating small● Shock or seismic waves are created by detonating smallcharges of explosives or by mechanical blows on a plate
th fnear the surface.
● Four basic wave types: Compression (P), Shear (S),Rayleigh (R), and Love (L).
S RTime
Amplitude
P
Time
Source Receiver (Geophone)
Oscilloscope
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
Receiver (Geophone)
EQUIPMENT
Seismograph Spectrum Analyzer
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
Portable Analyzer Velocity Recorder
SEISMIC REFRACTION METHOD
● Seismic waves havedifferent velocities indifferent velocities indifferent types of soil orrockrock.
● The waves are refractedwhen they cross theboundary betweendifferent types of soil.
● Radiating waves aregpicked up and time oftravel from sourcetravel from sourcerecorded by geophonesor seismometers
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
or seismometers.
SEISMIC REFRACTION METHOD
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
DETERMINATION OF SOIL LAYERS
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
Limitations of Seismic Refraction Test
● Cannot be used where a hard layer overlies a soft layer
C t b d i d b t h lt● Cannot be used in area covered by concrete or asphalt
pavement which represent hard layer
● Frozen surface layer also may give results similar to the
situation of a hard layer over a soft layersituation of a hard layer over a soft layer.
● Discontinuities such as a rock fault or earth cuts, dipping
or irregular under ground rock surface and existence of
thin layers of varying materials may cause mis-
interpretation of test data.
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY METHOD
● Based on the measurement and
recording of changes in the meanrecording of changes in the mean
resistivity or apparent specific
resistance of various soils.
● Significant variations in resistivity
can be detected between differentcan be detected between different
types of soils, above and below
water table, between unfissured
● Four metal spikes are driving in ground along a straight line at equal
,
rocks and soils.
distances to serve as electrodes
● Current I from a battery, flows through the soil between the two outery, g
electrodes, producing an electrical field within the soil.
● Potential difference E between the two inner electrodes is then
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
Potential difference E between the two inner electrodes is then
measured.
ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY METHOD EQUIPMENTS
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY METHOD
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY MEASUREMENTS
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
UNIVERSITY QUESTIONS
● Briefly explain (i) Objectives of soil exploration;
(ii) Reconnaissance survey in soil exploration(ii) Reconnaissance survey in soil exploration.
● Explain in detail Auger and Shell boring methods of site
exploration. What are its advantages and limitations?
● Explain (i) Wash Boring; (ii) Rotary Drilling What are its● Explain (i) Wash Boring; (ii) Rotary Drilling. What are its
advantages and limitations?
● List out the factors, which affect the spacing between the bore holes.
● What is meant by significant depth of exploration? Give guidelines, which enable the determination of the depth of exploration.
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
UNIVERSITY QUESTIONS● What are the various types of samples?
● Why undisturbed samples are necessary?y p y
● Briefly explain the methods of obtaining undisturbed samples.p
● Bring out the role of preservation and handling of samples in sub-surface exploration.in sub surface exploration.
● What is a bore hole? Distinguish between thin-wall and thick-wall samplersthick-wall samplers.
● Explain the working of a piston sampler with sketches.
D fi I id Cl d O t id Cl● Define Inside Clearance and Outside Clearance as applied to sampler. What are its significance?
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
UNIVERSITY QUESTIONS
● What are penetration and sounding tests? Under what conditions do you recommend these tests? y
● What is Standard Penetration Test? Explain the test setup and the procedure of conducting the test. What are the p gcorrections to the observed SPT (N) value?
● Discuss the merits and demerits of SPT in the sub-surface investigation.
● Briefly discuss any two methods of determining the ground water table.
● Prepare a typical soil exploration report for the construction of a multi-storied commercial building.
● Explain Seismic Refraction Method of exploration. What are its limitations?
● Explain Electrical Resistivity method of exploration. What are it li it ti ?
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
its limitations?
PLATE LOAD TEST
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode