Gee’s Field Building Project

23

description

Gee’s Field Building Project. Main Focus of the Book. This is a discipline-building book: How does a new area of study emerge? How can scholars help it emerge? The “new” area: Digital Media and Learning (DMAL). Book Overview. Definitions of field, discipline, thematic discipline - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Gee’s Field Building Project

Page 1: Gee’s Field Building Project
Page 2: Gee’s Field Building Project

Main Focus of the Book

This is a discipline-building book: How does a new area of study

emerge? How can scholars help it emerge?

The “new” area: Digital Media and Learning (DMAL)

Page 3: Gee’s Field Building Project

Book Overview

Definitions of field, discipline, thematic discipline

What DMAL is Stories about the emergence of

fields related to DMAL Using exemplars and worked

examples for field-building Gee’s example worked example

Page 4: Gee’s Field Building Project

Field: loosely associated group of people studying a generally defined area

Discipline: more specialized area of research with particular methods, questions, and ways of understanding

Thematic discipline: area centered around a theme that cuts across many different disciplines and disciplinary specializations.

Page 5: Gee’s Field Building Project
Page 6: Gee’s Field Building Project

Failed Discipline Building: Literacy Studies Scholars couldn’t agree on whether

literacy has specific effects or a range of different effects

“scholars studying literacy never came to share a core set of perspectives, principles, and tools” (7).

Page 7: Gee’s Field Building Project

DMAL should become a thematic discipline“…work in this area will become a field,

a thematic discipline, or eventually a discipline of its own or a disciplinary specialization of some larger new discipline (e.g., digital culture) depending on how integration happens. In my view, the ‘deepest’ thing that could happen to work in digital media and learning would be for it to become a thematic discipline” (5).

Page 8: Gee’s Field Building Project

Do we agree with Gee that scholars should attempt to make DMAL into a more coherent field?

Question

Page 9: Gee’s Field Building Project

Digital media and learning cannot and should not, in my view, drop the strong tie to learning and become just digital media studies as a branch of cultural studies” (8).

Page 10: Gee’s Field Building Project

Definition of DMAL

“It is, rather, the study of how digital tools and new forms of convergent media, production, and participation, as well as powerful forms of social organization and complexity in popular culture, can teach us how to enhance learning in and out of school and how to transform society and the global world as well” (14).

Page 11: Gee’s Field Building Project

What are other possible ways of defining DMAL?

Question

Page 12: Gee’s Field Building Project

New Literacy Studies

Argued that literacy is affected by many social and cultural factors

People have multiple literacies Never became a full-fledged area

Page 13: Gee’s Field Building Project

Situated Cognition Studies Thinking is based on previous

experiences, not abstract concepts Situated cognition studies is a

coherent area

Page 14: Gee’s Field Building Project

New Literacies Studies

Studies the different types of literacies

Page 15: Gee’s Field Building Project

New Media Literacies Studies Studies how digital media are

transforming society and culture

Page 16: Gee’s Field Building Project

“ In fact, the way forward to more commonality, sharing, collaboration, and accumulated knowledge is not through more reading and citing of formal literature; rather, it is through being more overt with each other in DMAL about our assumptions, influences, and approaches”(39).

Page 17: Gee’s Field Building Project

“Transformative work in new areas or old ones often shows up at the margins of established areas, sometimes in forms rejected by established authorities, before it redefines what counts as a center” (50).

Page 18: Gee’s Field Building Project

Exemplars

Work that comes to be regarded as a “best example” of what work in a field should be

What are our “exemplars?”

Page 19: Gee’s Field Building Project

“Play Exemplars”

Instead of waiting for exemplars to emerge, we should make bids for work to be accepted as exemplars through “worked examples”

Page 20: Gee’s Field Building Project

Worked Examples

http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/lectures/time_dil.pdf

http://inkido.indiana.edu/barab_we/ http://worked_examples.crlt.indiana.

edu/

Page 21: Gee’s Field Building Project

Is Gee’s concept of “play exemplars” idea a good way to build a discipline?

Question

Page 22: Gee’s Field Building Project

Gee’s example: Yu-Gi-Oh!

“Yu-Gi-Oh! involves complex language that is relevant to young people’s success in school and society”

*Did the formatting of the worked example confuse anyone else?

Page 23: Gee’s Field Building Project

Is Gee’s “example worked example” a solid contribution to the field building he proposes? Does it work?

Question