GE 494 Final Presentation

53
Design Optimization for Dadant Product Work Cells Bridgeway | Group #2 Students: Arielle Anderson-Venerable Jordan Palmer Kelsey Schreiber Advisor: Prof. Sewoong Oh Contact: Tammy Diefendorf Scott Teel Brittany Aten 1

Transcript of GE 494 Final Presentation

Page 1: GE 494 Final Presentation

Design Optimization for Dadant Product Work CellsBridgeway | Group #2

Students: Arielle Anderson-VenerableJordan PalmerKelsey Schreiber

Advisor: Prof. Sewoong Oh

Contact: Tammy DiefendorfScott TeelBrittany Aten

1

Page 2: GE 494 Final Presentation

OverviewBridgeway Introduction

Dadant & Sons

Assembly Tasks

Problem Statement

Objectives

Air Flow and Drying Options

Systematic Layout Planning

Line Balancing Analysis

Economic Analysis

Conclusions and Recommendations

Q & A

2

Page 3: GE 494 Final Presentation

“Creating Solutions for Everyone.”

Affirmative Employment ServicePhysical and/or mental disabilities

Consumer vs. Productionist

Contract Work Dadant & Sons -- Beekeeping Supplies

3

Page 4: GE 494 Final Presentation

Production Overview

Final Assembly and Packaging

4

Frame Production

Hive Body Production

Shipping Box Construction

Page 5: GE 494 Final Presentation

Frame Production (1 of 2)

5

Page 6: GE 494 Final Presentation

Frame Production (2 of 2)6

Page 7: GE 494 Final Presentation

Hive Body Production (1 of 3)

7

Page 8: GE 494 Final Presentation

Hive Body Production (2 of 3)

8

Page 9: GE 494 Final Presentation

Hive Body Production (3 of 3)

9

Page 10: GE 494 Final Presentation

Final Assembly and Packaging

10

Page 11: GE 494 Final Presentation

Problem StatementImprove efficiency of facility layout

Reduce non-value added work & work in process

Decrease drying time for painted/primed hive bodies

11

Page 12: GE 494 Final Presentation

Objectives

Conduct time studies

Use Systematic Layout Planning (SLP)

Line Balancing Analysis

Establish and improve paint/primer drying time

Conduct economic analysis

Recommend improvements

12

Page 13: GE 494 Final Presentation

Paint Drying - Current State13

Primer Paint

Bridgeway Estimate 175 min - Overnight* 55 min - Overnight*

Label Estimate 60 min 60 min

*Current drying time highly variable due to environmental conditions.

Page 14: GE 494 Final Presentation

Paint Drying - Environmental Improvements Move drying into paint room

Temperature Control

Dehumidifier

Air Ventilation

14

[Ivation 2016, Vornado 2016]

Page 15: GE 494 Final Presentation

Paint Drying - Systematic Improvements

● Digital/Kitchen Timers● Dry Erase Time Notation● Time Stamp Labeling

15

[Amazer 2016, Cosmos 2016, Demarkt 2016]

Page 16: GE 494 Final Presentation

SLP- Introduction

Quick material flow

Less WIP

Reduced handling

Subjective -> objectiveFlowPlanner

16

[Muther 1973]

Page 17: GE 494 Final Presentation

SLP- Flow Planner Initial Analysis17

● Product/Part Routes Mapped in AutoCad● Routes along Aisles● Wage and Walking Speed along paths● Aggregate per Monthly production

Page 18: GE 494 Final Presentation

SLP - AEIOUX Analysis18

Page 19: GE 494 Final Presentation

SLP - Design and Analysis Phase Used AEIOUX to guide design of new layouts

Maximize A, E, and I relationships

Analyze layouts in FlowPlanner

19

Page 20: GE 494 Final Presentation

SLP- Consulting with Bridgeway

● Selected layout 4● Not most Efficient but…

○ Sound Accommodations

20

Page 21: GE 494 Final Presentation

SLP - Layout Implementation

21

Page 22: GE 494 Final Presentation

Balance workload among workstations

Decrease Idle Time

Decrease work pile-ups

22

Line Balancing- Introduction

Page 23: GE 494 Final Presentation

Line Balancing- Unique Challenges

Typical Line Balancing

Involves assigning different tasks to same workstation or worker to balance workload

The Challenge

Consumers and Productionists are limited to very specific tasks based on abilities

23

Page 24: GE 494 Final Presentation

Line Balancing- Typical Method24

● A new unit enters next workstation every 15 minutes● Number of tasks/worker varies

Page 25: GE 494 Final Presentation

Line Balancing- Alternative Approach

25

● A new unit enters the next workstation every 5 minutes● Number of workers/task varies

Page 26: GE 494 Final Presentation

Line Balancing- Precedence Diagram

26

Must happen 10 times before next step:Total Time = 8.7 minutes

Page 27: GE 494 Final Presentation

Line Balancing Summary

66% consumer employment increase

Minimum Cycle Time: 2.31 minutes

Constraint: Hive Body Construction

27

Page 28: GE 494 Final Presentation

Economic Analysis

Initial Cost: $1,629.00

Monthly Savings: $2,593.00

Monthly Recurring Costs: $24.00

Payback Period: 19 days

Monthly IRR: 155%

Yearly IRR: 1633%

28

Page 29: GE 494 Final Presentation

Economic Analysis- Supply Increase

97 bodies per day → 2143/month

Current average: 1664/month

Revenue increase: $2,933.00Total increase: $5,526.00

54% increase in average hive body revenue

29% increase in product throughput

29

Page 30: GE 494 Final Presentation

ConclusionsLoss of profit each month due to

layout

Hive body drying process is long

Bridgeway's supply from Dadant is inconsistent

30

Page 31: GE 494 Final Presentation

RecommendationsDesign

Drying Room

Dadant supplies

31

Page 32: GE 494 Final Presentation

Questions?

32

Page 33: GE 494 Final Presentation

Option #1

33

Page 34: GE 494 Final Presentation

Option #2

34

Page 35: GE 494 Final Presentation

Option #3

35

Page 36: GE 494 Final Presentation

Option #4

36

Page 37: GE 494 Final Presentation

Option #5

37

Page 38: GE 494 Final Presentation

Budget/Economic Analysis

Grant-based funding

Non-profit organization

Previous work with Dadant & SonsNon-standard payment setup

Short-term loss for long-term success

Supply restrictions

38

Page 39: GE 494 Final Presentation

Project Constraints

There are some constraints that the project team must account for, including: 1. Tasks, and how they are completed, must remain the same. Both consumers and

productionists are trained by an outside team, and restructuring training and specific tasks is not an option.

2. Productionists must complete all steps involving the movement of materials around the plant.

3. Frame stapling and box hammering must be kept away from the office as they interfere with communication.

4. Stapling equipment is not owned by Bridgeway, and thus is not eligible for possible design updates.

39

Page 40: GE 494 Final Presentation

Flow Planner - Aisle Routes (Large Hive Bodies)

40

Page 41: GE 494 Final Presentation

Flow Planner- Direct Paths (Large Hive Bodies)

41

Page 42: GE 494 Final Presentation

Flow Planner- Configuration,1 (Large Hive Bodies)

42

Page 43: GE 494 Final Presentation

Flow Planner- Configuration.2 (Large Hive Bodies)

43

Page 44: GE 494 Final Presentation

“Creating Solutions for Everyone.”

Est. 1993

Affirmative Employment ServicePhysical and/or mental disabilities

9000 people employed/served per year

Contract Work

44

Page 45: GE 494 Final Presentation

Project Location | Macomb, IL.

45

Production Areas

Storage

Storage

StorageArea

Page 46: GE 494 Final Presentation

Air Flow/Drying

46

Page 47: GE 494 Final Presentation

Space for Temporary Jobs

47

Page 48: GE 494 Final Presentation

Work in Process

48

Page 49: GE 494 Final Presentation

Drying Room Stairs

49

Page 50: GE 494 Final Presentation

Project Gantt Chart50

Page 51: GE 494 Final Presentation

Work Flow51

Page 52: GE 494 Final Presentation

SLP - Noise Constraints52

Page 53: GE 494 Final Presentation

ISO Certification

Provide guidelines that can be used consistently to ensure that materials, products, processes and services are fit for their purpose

21000+ standards (for purchase)

Ensure products and services are safe, reliable, and good quality

Reduce costs by minimizing waste and errors, and increasing productivity

53

[ISO.org]