Gaston Phillips 101 345 730
32
An Analysis of Alfred Adler’s Some Long Term relations among Money Supply, Price Levels, and Economic States Phase Relations, Holonomy, and the Underlying Curvature of the Commodity Price - Money Supply Space: Gaston Phillips 101 345 730
description
Phase Relations, Holonomy, and the Underlying Curvature of the Commodity Price - Money Supply Space:. An Analysis of Alfred Adler’s Some Long Term relations among Money Supply, Price Levels, and Economic States. Gaston Phillips 101 345 730. Holonomy and Fiscal Space. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Gaston Phillips 101 345 730
An Analysis of Alfred Adler’sSome Long Term relations among Money Supply,
Price Levels, and Economic States
Phase Relations, Holonomy, and the Underlying Curvature of the Commodity Price - Money Supply Space:
Gaston Phillips101 345 730
Holonomy and Fiscal Space
• No direct relation exists between Money Supply and Commodity Price
• If the relationship can be described by a Phase Rule, then the space of Money Supply - Commodity Price is curved
• If the Space can be shown to be curved, then the relationship can be better understood.
• 1. Money Supply and Commodity Price
• 2. Holonomy
• 3. The Phase Rule
• 4. Hypothesis
• 5. Conclusion
1. Money Supply and Commodity Price
US Money Supply (In Billions)
y = 4.3229x - 8118.9
R2 = 0.5053
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1825 1875 1925 1975
Money Supply
Linear (Money Supply)
Annual Average Consumer Price Index
P(t) = 1.5751t - 2922.7
R2 = 0.5596
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
1825 1875 1925 1975
CPILinear (CPI)
y = 0.3367x + 39.928R2 = 0.9457
050
100150200250300350400450500
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
U.S. Money Supply (In Bllions)
Ann
ual A
vera
ge C
PI
y = 0.3367x + 39.928R2 = 0.9457
1
10
100
1000
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
US Money Supply (In Billions)
Ann
ual a
vera
ge C
PI
Money Supply (M2) vs Commodity Price
Dm/dt vs dc/dt
y = 0.3663x - 0.0026R2 = 0.1655
-0.25
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3
dm/dt
dc/dt
2. Holonomy(A Brief Explanation)
Evidence of Holonomy
• The “loop” in the graph of Money Supply and Commodity Price means that the economy had the same (Price, Money) coordinates twice, and moved in two different directions.
Holonomy 1
• Consider a Triangle whose sides are on great circles of a sphere.
• The three vertices are all right angles
Holonomy 2
• Draw a vector (here in yellow), on the surface of the sphere.
Holonomy 3
• As you parallel transport the vector to the second vertex, it remains parallel to the first side and perpendicular to the second.
Holonomy 4
• As the vector moves to the third vertex, it remains perpendicular to the second side, so it’s parallel to the third.
Holonomy 5
• Now as it moves back to the first vertex it remains parallel to the third side, so it ends up perpendicular to the first, rotated 90 degrees from its original orientation.
3. The Phase Rule
H0: dm/dt behaves according to the Phase Rule
Log-Scaled Commodity Price
c(t) = 0.0061t - 9.8634R2 = 0.709
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
1825 1850 1875 1900 1925 1950 1975 2000
c(t)Linear (c(t))
Periodicity Modulo 55
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
1825 1850 1875 1900 1925 1950 1975 2000
c(t)G(t)
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
1825 1845 1865 1885 1905 1925 1945 1965 1985 2005
G(t)
With c(t) the logarithm of commodity prices at time t, G(t) is defined to be a measure of c(t)’s deviation from periodicity. The years 1840-1895 are taken as the base.
If t is between 1785 and 1840 then G(t) = c(t+55)
If t is between 1840 and 1895 then G(t) = c(t)
If t is between 1895 and 1950 then G(t) = c(t-55)
If t is between 1950 and 1980 then G(t) = c(t-110)
G(t) is called ASCENDING is t is congruent modulo 55 to a year in the interval from 1840 to 1864.
G(t) - The Ideal Commodity Supply Curve
Phase RuledG/dt > 0 and dm/dt > dM/dt then dc/dt = dG/dtdG/dt > 0 and dm/dt = dM/dt then dc/dt = dG/dtdG/dt > 0 and dm/dt < dM/dt then *
dG/dt = 0 and dm/dt > dM/dt then dc/dt = dG/dtdG/dt = 0 and dm/dt = dM/dt then dc/dt = dG/dtdG/dt = 0 and dm/dt < dM/dt then *
dG/dt < 0 and dm/dt > dM/dt then dc/dt = F(t) dm/dtdG/dt < 0 and dm/dt = dM/dt then dc/dt = dG/dtdG/dt < 0 and dm/dt < dM/dt then dc/dt = dG/dt
Log-Scaled Money Supply
M(t) = 0.0238t - 44.424R2 = 0.9935
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
1825 1845 1865 1885 1905 1925 1945 1965 1985 2005
Year
m(t) - log scaled money supply
M(t) - Long Term Trend of m(t)
Change in log-scaled Money
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
1825 1875 1925 1975
dm/dtdM/dt
1860-1865 G(t) Ascending and m(t) ascending In Phase
1865-1870 G(t) Declining and m(t) declining In Phase
1870-1887 G(t) Declining and m(t) neutral In Phase
1887-1895 G(t) Declining and m(t) declining In Phase
1895-1908* G(t) Ascending and m(t) ascending In Phase
1908-1915 G(t) Ascending and m(t) declining Out of Phase
1915-1920 G(t) Ascending and m(t) ascending In Phase
1921-1933 G(t) Declining and m(t) declining In Phase
1933-1950* G(t) Declining and m(t) ascending Out of Phase
1950-1963* G(t) Declining and m(t) declining Out of Phase
1963-1975 G(t) Ascending and m(t) neutral In Phase
1976-** G(t) Declining and m(t) ascending Out of Phase
Phases by Year
Year My Analysis Adler’s Analysis
1976 IN OUT
1963*-1967, 1970, 1974 OUT IN
1937-1938, 1947-1949, 1952, 1958, IN OUT
1915*, 1920, 1923, 1925 OUT IN
1909*, 1911-1912 IN OUT
1860, 1864, 1870-1872, 1880-1883, 1886-1887, 1889-1890, 1892, 1895-1896, 1907-1908
OUT IN
Table of Discrepancies
4. Hypothesis
• H0: The Phase Relation Holds.• HA: The Phase Relation Does Not Hold.
• If G(t) and M(t) are In Phase, then dc/dt = dG/dt• (dc/dt-dG/dt=)• Ho: = 0 • HA: ≠ 0• If G(t) and M(t) are Not In Phase, then dc/dt = F(t) dm/dt where F(t) is
between 0 and 1.• (0 < dc/dt / dm/dt < 1 -> dc/dt / dm/dt= )• Ho: 0 < < 1• HA: > 1
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1825 1875 1925 1975
alpha
Test Statistic
Error by Phase
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1825 1875 1925 1975
Error (In Phase)Error (Out of Phase)
Errors by Agreement
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1825 1875 1925 1975
Error (Agreeing)Error (Disagreeing)
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
1828 1853 1878 1903 1928 1953 1978 2003
m(t) Linear mt) Error
Linear Prediction of Log Scaled Money Supply
Linear Prediction of Log Scaled Commodity Price
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
1828 1853 1878 1903 1928 1953 1978 2003
c(t) Linear Error
Error and Variance
In Phase
Out of Phase*
0.00054
0.74035
* 60 out of 93 disagreements are judged out of phase, which may explain the poor predictive values,
Variance
Total 0.38726
Phase Standard Deviation. 0.02323. 0.86043. 0.6223
Money SupplyCommodity Price
**- The Mean Squared Distance from Linearly Predicted Value seems analogous to Variance for variables which differ from a line instead of a mean.
0.04420.0099
Nonlinearity**Statistic Linear Deviance***0.09950.2102
*** - Linear Deviance is here taken to mean the square root of Nonlinearity – analogous to the standard deviation.
5. ConclusionWhile the predicted values of dc/dt fit best during the periods when the economy is in phase, the values for out of phase periods don’t even match the accuracy of a simple linear prediction.
However, out of the 176 years, there are only 13 instances where the error, squared, exceeds the product of the Linear Deviations of Money Supply and Commodity Price.
