GASP Questionnaire Results
32
ICAO QUESTIONNAIRE ON GASP UPDATE Review of Results Issued: 8 October 2021 1
Transcript of GASP Questionnaire Results
ICAO QUESTIONNAIRE ON
GASP UPDATE
Review of Results
Issued: 8 October 2021
1
Overview• Questionnaire on Global Aviation Safety Plan update
– included in HLCC 2021-WP/6
• Allowed key stakeholders to provide feedback on 2020-2022 edition of GASP – organizational (ORG) challenges – operational (OPS) safety risks – implementation of regional and national aviation safety plans (RASP/NASP)– safety performance measurement (SPM)– and proposals for 2023-2025 edition of GASP
• 65 replies received
2
3
Organizational Challenges
What are main ORG challenges to achieve GASP goals & targets?
4
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Implementing effective SSP
Strengthening safety oversight capabilities
Implementing SSP Foundation
Other
Does GASP assist State/organization in addressing ORG challenges?
5
Yes, 94%
No, 6%
If yes, how does GASP assist State/organization
in addressing ORG challenges?
6
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Guidance to support SSP implementation
Assisting improve safety oversight capabilities
Aligning NASP/RASP safety-related activities with global ones
Helping State/IO identify ORG challenges
Guidance to address ORG challenges through Roadmap
Other
If no, how does GASP not assist State/organization
in addressing ORG challenges?
• Challenges due to impact of COVID-19 pandemic
• Need further guidance to support SSP implementation
• Need assistance in improving State safety oversight capabilities
• Need assistance aligning national/regional safety-related activities with global ones
7
Has your State implemented an SSP?
8
Yes, 85.43%
No, 12.94%
N/A, 1.63%
Note: N/A applies to
International Organizations
If yes, how is SSP linked to NASP?
9
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Other
NASP is overarching document, outside SSP documentation
NASP is part of SSP documentation
Information from SSP is used to develop/update NASP
If no, what are main reasons for lack of SSP implementation?
10
Other
Lack of financial resources
Lack of qualified technical personnel
Lack of safety data collection and processing systems
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
11
Operational Safety Risks
What are main OPS safety risks to achieve GASP goals and targets?
12
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
Controlled flight
into terrain
Loss of control in-
flight
Mid-air collision Runway excursion Runway incursion Other
Does GASP assist State/organization in addressing OPS safety risks,
including national/regional HRCs?
13
Yes, 75.10%
No, 24.90%
If yes, how does GASP assist State/organization
in addressing these risks?
14
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Other
Benchmark national/regional OPS safety risks with global ones
Aligning national/regional HRCs to global ones
Guidance addressing HRCs through roadmap
Assisting identify HRCs
If no, how does GASP not assist State/organization
in addressing these risks?
• State has established processes to manage national operational safety risks
• GASP limits its scope to commercial scheduled operations
• State faces resource challenges
• Need assistance aligning national/regional safety-related activities
– with global ones
15
16
Implementation of NASP/RASP
Does your State/organization have NASP/RASP?
17
Yes, 68.20%
No, 30.98%
N/A, 0.82%
Note: N/A applies to
International Organizations
If yes, (State) is NASP in line with GASP and/or RASP?
18
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Yes, in line with GASP, no published RASP
Yes, in line with GASP, but not the RASP
No, not in line with either GASP nor RASP
Not specified
Yes, in line with GASP/RASP
If yes, (regional organization) is RASP in line with GASP?
19
Yes, in line with GASP,
39%
No, not in line with the
GASP, 21%
Not specified, 40%
What is status of your State/organization’s NASP or RASP?
20
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
N/A
Published
Not started
Published and currently being implemented
Under development
Developed but not published yet
Note: N/A applies to
International Organizations
Do GASP and supporting guidance material/tools assist in development
of NASP or RASP?
21
Yes, 98.78%
N/A, 1.22%
Note: N/A applies to
International Organizations
If yes, which guidance material/tools are useful?
22
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
GASP
Doc 10131, RASP/NASP Guidance/Templates
GASP public website
USOAP CMA Online Framework
Cir 358, RASP/NASP Checklists
SSP Foundation Tool
SSP Gap Analysis Tool
NASP workshops
SOI Application
NASP Online Community
Secure Portal
State Safety Briefing
Other
What additional points to include in GASP/guidance
material/tools support NASP/RASP implementation?
• Align GASP with other Global Plans
• Address COVID-19 impact on aviation safety / recovery & resiliency
• Address innovation, digitalization and new entrants
• Safety Management guidance– Safety risk management, management of change, SPIs, etc.
• Implementation support– NASP Workshops, training, etc.
• Guidance on HRC contributing factors
• Address specific topics– e.g. Cyber Security, Conflict Zones
23
24
GASP Goals and Targets
Which of GASP target(s) does your State/organization
face biggest challenges in achieving?
25
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
T2.1(a) By 2022, States to improve EI score to 75%
T2.2 – By 2022,States to reach a SOI > 1
T3.1 – By 2022, States to implement SSP foundation
T4.1 – By 2020, States that do not expect to meet GASP Goals 2 and 3, to seek assistance
T4.2 – By 2022, all States to contribute information on safety risks
T4.3 – By 2022, States with effective safety oversight capabilities/SSP, to lead RASG SRM activities
T5.1 – By 2020, service providers to use globally harmonized SPIs as part of SMS
T5.2 – By 2022, increase number of service providers in ICAO-recognized industry assessment
programmes
T6.1 – By 2022, States to implement AN and airport core infrastructure
For GASP targets with biggest challenges, which mechanisms are
being sought for assistance?
26
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
GASOS
ICAO TCB
ICAO Regional Office
RSOO
None, being addressed internally only
Assistance from another State
Do GASP targets for draft 2023-2025 GASP assist your
State/organization address ORG challenges and OPS safety risks?
27
Yes, 72.88%
No, 27.12%
If not, what amendments should be made to proposed
GASP targets for draft 2023-2025 edition of GASP?
• Transparent process/criteria to identify the HRCs
• Reconsider use of SOI as GASP indicator
• Modify Goal 5 to refer to ‘harmonized metrics’– not harmonized SPIs
• Proposed new GASP indicators
• Align GASP with GANP Framework (work of GIPEG)
• Review timelines in GASP targets for feasibility
28
Do you agree with the other proposals made for inclusion in the draft 2023-
2025 edition of the GASP?
29
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Review terminology iun GASP and GM
Clarify Goal 5
Guidance on GASP/RASP/NASP relationship
NASP/SSP relationship
Guidance on data sources related to GASP targets/indicators
Clarify use of GASP indicators
If not, what other proposals would you make for
inclusion in draft 2023-2025 edition of GASP?
• Reconsider use of SOI as GASP indicator
• Review timelines in targets for feasibility
• Address aviation sustainability & resiliency
• Safety Management guidance
– Safety risk management, management of change, SPIs, etc.
• Guidance on HRC contributing factors
30
Summary• Majority of respondents noted GASP helps identify ORG challenges
and Ops safety risks– Main ORG challenge: implementing effective SSP
– Runway excursions/incursions main HRCs
• Majority of respondents have NASP– in line with GASP/RASP
– Most is developed but not published
• Majority of respondents in favor of proposals for 2023-2025 GASP– Current Goal 5 is seen as most challenging
– Need guidance on GASP SPIs
– Include impact of pandemic / aviation recovery
31
