Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for...

79
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5

Transcript of Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for...

Page 1: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia)

Variable Costing:A Tool for Management

Chapter 5

Page 2: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 2

Learning Objective 1

Explain how variable Explain how variable costing differs from costing differs from

absorption costing and absorption costing and compute unit product compute unit product

costs under each costs under each method.method.

Page 3: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 3

Absorption CostingIncome Statement

Variable CostingIncome Statement

Sales Sales

Direct materials

Direct labor Cost of Goods Sold(Variable Product Costs)

Cost of Goods Sold Variable manufacturing overhead(Fixed and variable

product costs)Variable

Selliing & Administrative

expenses

Gross Profit (Gross Margin)

Fixed manufacturing overhead Contribution Margin

Fixed Manufacturing

overhead

Selling & Adminstrative

expensesSelling & Administrative expenses

Fixed Selling &

Administrative expenses

Net O perating Income Net O perating Income

KEY: = Period expenses

Overview of Absorption and Variable Costing

Page 4: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 4

Quick Check

Which method will produce the highest values for work in process and finished goods inventories?

a. Absorption costing.

b. Variable costing.

c. They produce the same values for these inventories.

d. It depends. . .

Which method will produce the highest values for work in process and finished goods inventories?

a. Absorption costing.

b. Variable costing.

c. They produce the same values for these inventories.

d. It depends. . .

Page 5: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 5

Which method will produce the highest values for work in process and finished goods inventories?

a. Absorption costing.

b. Variable costing.

c. They produce the same values for these inventories.

d. It depends. . .

Which method will produce the highest values for work in process and finished goods inventories?

a. Absorption costing.

b. Variable costing.

c. They produce the same values for these inventories.

d. It depends. . .

Quick Check

Page 6: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 6

Harvey Company produces a single productwith the following information available:

Unit Cost Computations

Page 7: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 7

Unit product cost is determined as follows:

Under absorption costing, all production costs, variable and fixed, are included when determining unit product

cost. Under variable costing, only the variable production costs are included in product costs.

Unit Cost Computations

Page 8: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 8

Learning Objective 2

Prepare income Prepare income statements using both statements using both variable and absorption variable and absorption

costing.costing.

Page 9: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 9

Income Comparison ofAbsorption and Variable Costing

Let’s assume the following additional information for Harvey Company. 20,000 units were sold during the year at a price

of $30 each. There is no beginning inventory.

Now, let’s compute net operatingincome using both absorptionand variable costing.

Page 10: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 10

Absorption Costing

Fixed manufacturing overhead deferred in inventory is 5,000 units × $6 = $30,000.

Page 11: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 11

Variable CostingSales (20,000 × $30) 600,000$ Less variable expenses: Beginning inventory -$ Add COGM (25,000 × $10) 250,000 Goods available for sale 250,000 Less ending inventory (5,000 × $10) 50,000 Variable cost of goods sold 200,000 Variable selling & administrative expenses (20,000 × $3) 60,000 260,000 Contribution margin 340,000 Less fixed expenses: Manufacturing overhead 150,000$ Selling & administrative expenses 100,000 250,000 Net operating income 90,000$

Variable CostingSales (20,000 × $30) 600,000$ Less variable expenses: Beginning inventory -$ Add COGM (25,000 × $10) 250,000 Goods available for sale 250,000 Less ending inventory (5,000 × $10) 50,000 Variable cost of goods sold 200,000 Variable selling & administrative expenses (20,000 × $3) 60,000 260,000 Contribution margin 340,000 Less fixed expenses: Manufacturing overhead 150,000$ Selling & administrative expenses 100,000 250,000 Net operating income 90,000$

Variablemanufacturing

costs only.

All fixedmanufacturing

overhead isexpensed.

Variable Costing

Page 12: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 12

Learning Objective 3

Reconcile variable Reconcile variable costing and absorption costing and absorption costing net operating costing net operating incomes and explain incomes and explain why the two amounts why the two amounts

differ.differ.

Page 13: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 13

Comparing the Two Methods

Page 14: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 14

Variable costing net operating income 90,000$ Add: Fixed mfg. overhead costs deferred in inventory (5,000 units × $6 per unit) 30,000 Absorption costing net operating income 120,000$

Variable costing net operating income 90,000$ Add: Fixed mfg. overhead costs deferred in inventory (5,000 units × $6 per unit) 30,000 Absorption costing net operating income 120,000$

Fixed mfg. overhead $150,000 Units produced 25,000 units

= = $6 per unit

We can reconcile the difference betweenabsorption and variable income as follows:

Comparing the Two Methods

Page 15: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 15

Extended Comparisons of Income Data Harvey Company – Year Two

Page 16: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 16

Unit Cost Computations

Since the variable costs per unit, total fixed costs, Since the variable costs per unit, total fixed costs, and the number of units produced remained and the number of units produced remained unchanged, the unit cost computations also unchanged, the unit cost computations also

remain unchanged.remain unchanged.

Page 17: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 17

Absorption CostingSales (30,000 × $30) 900,000$ Less cost of goods sold: Beg. inventory (5,000 × $16) 80,000$ Add COGM (25,000 × $16) 400,000 Goods available for sale 480,000 Less ending inventory - 480,000 Gross margin 420,000 Less selling & admin. exp. Variable (30,000 × $3) 90,000$ Fixed 100,000 190,000 Net operating income 230,000$

Absorption CostingSales (30,000 × $30) 900,000$ Less cost of goods sold: Beg. inventory (5,000 × $16) 80,000$ Add COGM (25,000 × $16) 400,000 Goods available for sale 480,000 Less ending inventory - 480,000 Gross margin 420,000 Less selling & admin. exp. Variable (30,000 × $3) 90,000$ Fixed 100,000 190,000 Net operating income 230,000$

Absorption Costing

Fixed manufacturing overhead released from inventory is 5,000 units × $6 = $30,000.

Unit product

cost.

Page 18: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 18

Variable Costing

All fixedmanufacturing

overhead isexpensed.

Variablemanufacturing

costs only.

Page 19: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 19

Variable costing net operating income 260,000$ Deduct: Fixed manufacturing overhead costs released from inventory (5,000 units × $6 per unit) 30,000 Absorption costing net operating income 230,000$

We can reconcile the difference betweenabsorption and variable income as follows:

Fixed mfg. overhead $150,000 Units produced 25,000 units

= = $6 per unit

Comparing the Two Methods

Page 20: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 20

Comparing the Two Methods

Page 21: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 21

Summary of Key Insights

Page 22: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 22

Learning Objective 4

Understand the Understand the advantages and advantages and

disadvantages of both disadvantages of both variable and absorption variable and absorption

costing.costing.

Page 23: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 23

Impact on the Manager

Opponents of absorption costing argue thatshifting fixed manufacturing overhead costs

between periods can lead to faulty decisions.

Opponents of absorption costing argue thatshifting fixed manufacturing overhead costs

between periods can lead to faulty decisions.

These opponents argue that variable costing incomestatements are easier to understand because net operating

income is only affected by changes in unit sales. Thisproduces net operating income figures that are

consistent with managers’ expectations.

These opponents argue that variable costing incomestatements are easier to understand because net operating

income is only affected by changes in unit sales. Thisproduces net operating income figures that are

consistent with managers’ expectations.

Page 24: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 24

CVP Analysis, Decision Makingand Absorption costing

Absorption costing does not dovetail with CVP analysis, nor does it support decision making. It treats fixed

manufacturing overhead as a variable cost. It assigns per unit fixed manufacturing overhead costs to production.

Treating fixed manufacturing overhead as a variable cost can:

• Lead to faulty pricing decisions and faulty keep-or-drop decisions.

Treating fixed manufacturing overhead as a variable cost can:

• Lead to faulty pricing decisions and faulty keep-or-drop decisions.

Assigning per unit fixed manufacturing overhead costs to production can:

• Potentially produce positive net operating income even when the number of units sold is less than the breakeven point.

Assigning per unit fixed manufacturing overhead costs to production can:

• Potentially produce positive net operating income even when the number of units sold is less than the breakeven point.

Page 25: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 25

External Reporting and Income Taxes

To conform toTo conform toIFRS and US GAAP IFRS and US GAAP

requirements, absorption costing requirements, absorption costing must be used formust be used for

external financial reports.external financial reports.

To conform toTo conform toIFRS and US GAAP IFRS and US GAAP

requirements, absorption costing requirements, absorption costing must be used formust be used for

external financial reports.external financial reports.

In many countries, including US,

absorption costing must beused when filling out income tax returns.

In many countries, including US,

absorption costing must beused when filling out income tax returns.

Since top executivesare typically evaluated based on

earnings reported to shareholdersin external reports, they may feel that

decisions should be based on absorption costing data.

Since top executivesare typically evaluated based on

earnings reported to shareholdersin external reports, they may feel that

decisions should be based on absorption costing data.

Page 26: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 26

Advantages of Variable Costingand the Contribution Approach

Advantages

Management findsit more useful.

Consistent withCVP analysis.

Net operating income is closer to

net cash flow.

Profit is not affected bychanges in inventories.

Consistent with standardcosts and flexible budgeting.

Impact of fixedcosts on profitsemphasized.

Easier to estimate profitabilityof products and segments.

Page 27: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 27

VariableCosting

Variable versus Absorption Costing

Fixed manufacturingcosts must be assignedto products to properlymatch revenues and

costs.

Fixed manufacturing costs are capacity costs

and will be incurredeven if nothing is

produced.

Page 28: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 28

Variable Costing and the Theory of Constraints (TOC)

Companies involved in TOC use a form of variable costing. However, one difference of the TOC approach is that it treats direct labor as a fixed cost for three reasons:

Many companies have a commitment to guarantee workers a minimum number of paid hours.

Direct labor is usually not the constraint.

TOC emphasizes the role direct laborers play in driving continuous improvement. Since layoffs often devastate morale, managers involved in TOC are extremely reluctant to lay off employees.

Page 29: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 29

Impact of Lean Production

When companies use Lean Production . . .

Productiontends to equal

sales . . .

So, the difference between variable andabsorption income tends to disappear.

Page 30: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 30

Learning Objective 5

Compute predetermined Compute predetermined overhead rates and explain overhead rates and explain

why estimated overhead why estimated overhead costs (rather than actual costs (rather than actual

overhead costs) being used overhead costs) being used in the costing process.in the costing process.

Page 31: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 31

Why Use an Allocation Base?

Manufacturing overhead is applied to products/jobs Manufacturing overhead is applied to products/jobs that are in process. An allocation base, such as that are in process. An allocation base, such as

direct labor hours, direct labor dollars, or machine direct labor hours, direct labor dollars, or machine hours, is used to assign manufacturing overhead to hours, is used to assign manufacturing overhead to

individual products/jobs.individual products/jobs.

Manufacturing overhead is applied to products/jobs Manufacturing overhead is applied to products/jobs that are in process. An allocation base, such as that are in process. An allocation base, such as

direct labor hours, direct labor dollars, or machine direct labor hours, direct labor dollars, or machine hours, is used to assign manufacturing overhead to hours, is used to assign manufacturing overhead to

individual products/jobs.individual products/jobs.

We use an allocation base because:

1.It is impossible or difficult to trace overhead costs to particular products/jobs.

2.Manufacturing overhead consists of many different items ranging from the grease used in machines to production manager’s salary.

3.Many types of manufacturing overhead costs are fixed even though output fluctuates during the period.

Page 32: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 32

The predetermined overhead rate (POHR) used to apply overhead to products/jobs is determined

before the period begins.

Manufacturing Overhead Application

Page 33: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 33

Using a predetermined rate makes itpossible to estimate total product/job costs sooner.

Actual overhead for the period is notknown until the end of the period.

The Need for a POHR

Page 34: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 34

Determining Predetermined Overhead RatesPredetermined overhead rates are calculated

using a three-step process.

Estimate the level of

production for the period.

Estimate the level of

production for the period.

Estimate total amount of the allocation base

for the period.

Estimate total amount of the allocation base

for the period.

Estimate total manufacturing

overhead costs.

Estimate total manufacturing

overhead costs.

POHR = ÷

Page 35: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 35

Actual amount of allocation is based upon the actual level of

activity (normal costing system).

Actual amount of allocation is based upon the actual level of

activity (normal costing system).

Based on estimates, and determined before the

period begins.

Based on estimates, and determined before the

period begins.

Application of Manufacturing Overhead

Overhead applied = POHR × Actual activity

Page 36: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 36

For each direct labor hour worked on a particular product, $3.00 of factory overhead will be applied to it. For product valuation, it must be valued by unit. In this case, assume each unit requires 2 direct labor hours. Hence,

each unit of the product absorbs $6 predetermined overhead. In order to match back with Harvey’s example, we further assume that variable

manufacturing overhead = 0. So the predetermined overhead represents only fixed manufacturing overhead cost as shown in slides 14 & 19.

For each direct labor hour worked on a particular product, $3.00 of factory overhead will be applied to it. For product valuation, it must be valued by unit. In this case, assume each unit requires 2 direct labor hours. Hence,

each unit of the product absorbs $6 predetermined overhead. In order to match back with Harvey’s example, we further assume that variable

manufacturing overhead = 0. So the predetermined overhead represents only fixed manufacturing overhead cost as shown in slides 14 & 19.

Overhead Application Rate for the Harvey Example

POHR = $3.00 per DLH

$150,000

50,000 direct labor hours (DLH)POHR =

Estimated total manufacturingoverhead cost for the coming period

Estimated total units in theallocation base for the coming period

POHR =

Page 37: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 37

Learning Objective 6

Understand the implications of basing the predetermined overhead rate on activity at capacity rather than on estimated activity for the period.

Page 38: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 38

Predetermined Overhead Rate and Capacity

Calculating predetermined overhead rates using an estimated, or budgeted amount of the allocation base has been criticized because:

1.Basing the predetermined overhead rate upon budgeted activity results in product costs that fluctuate depending upon the activity level.

2.Calculating predetermined rates based upon budgeted activity charges products for costs that they do not use.

Calculating predetermined overhead rates using an estimated, or budgeted amount of the allocation base has been criticized because:

1.Basing the predetermined overhead rate upon budgeted activity results in product costs that fluctuate depending upon the activity level.

2.Calculating predetermined rates based upon budgeted activity charges products for costs that they do not use.

Page 39: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 39

Capacity-Based Overhead Rates

Criticisms can be overcome by using Criticisms can be overcome by using estimated total units in the allocation base estimated total units in the allocation base

at capacity in the denominator of the at capacity in the denominator of the predetermined overhead rate calculation.predetermined overhead rate calculation.

Criticisms can be overcome by using Criticisms can be overcome by using estimated total units in the allocation base estimated total units in the allocation base

at capacity in the denominator of the at capacity in the denominator of the predetermined overhead rate calculation.predetermined overhead rate calculation.

Let’s look at the difference!Let’s look at the difference!

Page 40: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 40

An Example

Equipment is leased for $100,000 per year. Running at full capacity, 50,000 units may be produced. The company

estimates that 40,000 units will be produced and sold next year. What is

the predetermined overhead rate?

Page 41: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 41

An Example

Equipment is leased for $100,000 per year. Running at full capacity, 50,000 units may be

produced. The company estimates that 40,000 units will be produced and sold next year.

TraditionalMethod

= $2.50 per unit$100,000

40,000=

Capacity Method

= $2.00 per unit$100,000

50,000=

Page 42: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 42

Quick Check

Barossa Winery in Barossa Valley, South Australia, leases an automatic corking machine for $100,000 per year. At full capacity, it can cork 50,000 cases of wine per year. The company estimates 40,000 cases of wine will be produced and sold next year. What is the predetermined overhead rate based on the estimated number of cases of wine?a. $2.00 per case.

b. $2.50 per case.

c. $4.00 per case.

Barossa Winery in Barossa Valley, South Australia, leases an automatic corking machine for $100,000 per year. At full capacity, it can cork 50,000 cases of wine per year. The company estimates 40,000 cases of wine will be produced and sold next year. What is the predetermined overhead rate based on the estimated number of cases of wine?a. $2.00 per case.

b. $2.50 per case.

c. $4.00 per case.

Page 43: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 43

Barossa Winery in Barossa Valley, South Australia, leases an automatic corking machine for $100,000 per year. At full capacity, it can cork 50,000 cases of wine per year. The company estimates 40,000 cases of wine will be produced and sold next year. What is the predetermined overhead rate based on the estimated number of cases of wine?a. $2.00 per case.b. $2.50 per case.c. $4.00 per case.

Barossa Winery in Barossa Valley, South Australia, leases an automatic corking machine for $100,000 per year. At full capacity, it can cork 50,000 cases of wine per year. The company estimates 40,000 cases of wine will be produced and sold next year. What is the predetermined overhead rate based on the estimated number of cases of wine?a. $2.00 per case.b. $2.50 per case.c. $4.00 per case.

Quick Check

Page 44: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 44

Quick Check

Barossa Winery in Barossa Valley, South Australia, leases an automatic corking machine for $100,000 per year. At full capacity, it can cork 50,000 cases of wine per year. The company estimates 40,000 cases of wine will be produced and sold next year. What is the predetermined overhead rate based on the number of cases of wine at capacity?a. $2.00 per case.

b. $2.50 per case.

c. $4.00 per case.

Page 45: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 45

Barossa Winery in Barossa Valley, South Australia, leases an automatic corking machine for $100,000 per year. At full capacity, it can cork 50,000 cases of wine per year. The company estimates 40,000 cases of wine will be produced and sold next year. What is the predetermined overhead rate based on the number of cases of wine at capacity?a. $2.00 per case.b. $2.50 per case.c. $4.00 per case.

Quick Check

Page 46: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 46

Quick Check

When capacity is used in the denominator of the predetermined rate, what happens to the predetermined overhead rate as estimated activity decreases?a. The predetermined overhead rate goes up when activity

goes down.

b. The predetermined overhead rate stays the same because it is not affected by changes in activity.

c. The predetermined overhead rate goes down when activity goes down.

When capacity is used in the denominator of the predetermined rate, what happens to the predetermined overhead rate as estimated activity decreases?a. The predetermined overhead rate goes up when activity

goes down.

b. The predetermined overhead rate stays the same because it is not affected by changes in activity.

c. The predetermined overhead rate goes down when activity goes down.

Page 47: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 47

When capacity is used in the denominator of the predetermined rate, what happens to the predetermined overhead rate as estimated activity decreases?a. The predetermined overhead rate goes up when

activity goes down.b. The predetermined overhead rate stays the

same because it is not affected by changes in activity.

c. The predetermined overhead rate goes down when activity goes down.

When capacity is used in the denominator of the predetermined rate, what happens to the predetermined overhead rate as estimated activity decreases?a. The predetermined overhead rate goes up when

activity goes down.b. The predetermined overhead rate stays the

same because it is not affected by changes in activity.

c. The predetermined overhead rate goes down when activity goes down.

Quick Check

Page 48: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 48

Quick Check When estimated activity is used in the

denominator of the predetermined rate, what happens to the predetermined overhead rate as estimated activity decreases?a. The predetermined overhead rate goes up when

activity goes down.

b. The predetermined overhead rate stays the same because it is not affected by changes in activity.

c. The predetermined overhead rate goes down when activity goes down.

Page 49: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 49

When estimated activity is used in the denominator of the predetermined rate, what happens to the predetermined overhead rate as estimated activity decreases?a. The predetermined overhead rate goes up

when activity goes down.b. The predetermined overhead rate stays the

same because it is not affected by changes in activity.

c. The predetermined overhead rate goes down when activity goes down.

Quick Check

Page 50: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 50

Income Statement Preparation – Capacity

Actual volume 40,000 casesSelling price $40.00 per caseVariable production cost $24.00 per caseFixed manufacturing overhead $100,000 per yearCapacity 50,000 casesPredetermined overhead rate $2.00 per caseFixed selling and admin. expense $500,000 per year

Revenue 1,600,000$ Cost of goods sold 1,040,000 Gross margin 560,000 Cost of idle capacity 20,000 Selling and admin. expense 500,000 Net operating income 40,000$

Page 51: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 51

Income Statement Preparation – Traditional

Actual volume 40,000 casesSelling price $40.00 per caseVariable production cost $24.00 per caseFixed manufacturing overhead $100,000 per yearCapacity 40,000 casesPredetermined overhead rate $2.50 per caseFixed selling and admin. expense $500,000 per year

Revenue 1,600,000$ Cost of goods sold 1,060,000 Gross margin 540,000 Cost of idle capacity - Selling and admin. expense 500,000 Net operating income 40,000$

Page 52: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 52

Learning Objective 7

Compute underapplied or Compute underapplied or overapplied overhead cost and overapplied overhead cost and

prepare the journal entry to prepare the journal entry to close the balance in close the balance in

Manufacturing Overhead to the Manufacturing Overhead to the appropriate accounts.appropriate accounts.

Page 53: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 53

Problems of Overhead Application

The difference between the overhead cost applied to Work in Process and the actual overhead costs of a

period is referred to as either underapplied or overapplied overhead.

Underapplied overhead exists when the amount of

overhead applied to products/ jobs during the

period using the predetermined overhead rate is less than the total

amount of overhead actually incurred during the period.

Underapplied overhead exists when the amount of

overhead applied to products/ jobs during the

period using the predetermined overhead rate is less than the total

amount of overhead actually incurred during the period.

Overapplied overheadOverapplied overhead exists when the amount of exists when the amount of

overhead applied to overhead applied to products/jobs during the products/jobs during the

period using the period using the predetermined overhead predetermined overhead

rate is rate is greater thangreater than the total the total amount of overhead actually amount of overhead actually incurred during the period.incurred during the period.

Overapplied overheadOverapplied overhead exists when the amount of exists when the amount of

overhead applied to overhead applied to products/jobs during the products/jobs during the

period using the period using the predetermined overhead predetermined overhead

rate is rate is greater thangreater than the total the total amount of overhead actually amount of overhead actually incurred during the period.incurred during the period.

Page 54: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 54

Recall the Harvey example between slides 9 and 36. Recall the Harvey example between slides 9 and 36. Let’s rename the example as Let’s rename the example as Harvey Fresh and and

assume assume actual overheadactual overhead for the year was for the year was $120,000$120,000 (instead of $150,000 in the original Harvey example). (instead of $150,000 in the original Harvey example). The total direct labor hours incurred were The total direct labor hours incurred were 50,00050,000. The . The

rest remains the same.rest remains the same.

How much total overhead was applied to How much total overhead was applied to Harvey FreshHarvey Fresh’s ’s products during the year? Use Harvey’s predetermined products during the year? Use Harvey’s predetermined

overhead rate of $3.00 per direct labor hour. overhead rate of $3.00 per direct labor hour.

Overhead Application Example

Overhead Applied During the PeriodApplied Overhead = POHR × Actual Direct Labor Hours

Applied Overhead = $3.00 per DLH × 50,000 DLH = $150,000

Page 55: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 55

Harvey FreshHarvey Fresh’s ’s actual overheadactual overhead for the year was for the year was $120,000$120,000 with a total of with a total of 50,00050,000 direct labor hours direct labor hours

worked on products.worked on products.

How much total overhead was applied to How much total overhead was applied to Harvey FreshHarvey Fresh’s’s products during the year? Use Harvey’s products during the year? Use Harvey’s

predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per direct labor predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per direct labor hour. hour. Overhead Applied During the Period

Applied Overhead = POHR × Actual Direct Labor Hours

Applied Overhead = $3.00 per DLH × 50,000 DLH = $150,000

Overhead Application Example

Page 56: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 56

Tiger, Ltd. had actual manufacturing overhead costs of $1,210,000 and a predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per machine hour. Tiger, Ltd. worked 290,000 machine hours during the period. Tiger’s manufacturing overhead is

a. $50,000 overapplied.

b. $50,000 underapplied.

c. $60,000 overapplied.

d. $60,000 underapplied.

Tiger, Ltd. had actual manufacturing overhead costs of $1,210,000 and a predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per machine hour. Tiger, Ltd. worked 290,000 machine hours during the period. Tiger’s manufacturing overhead is

a. $50,000 overapplied.

b. $50,000 underapplied.

c. $60,000 overapplied.

d. $60,000 underapplied.

Quick Check

Page 57: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 57

Tiger, Ltd. had actual manufacturing overhead costs of $1,210,000 and a predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per machine hour. Tiger, Ltd. worked 290,000 machine hours during the period. Tiger’s manufacturing overhead is

a. $50,000 overapplied.

b. $50,000 underapplied.

c. $60,000 overapplied.

d. $60,000 underapplied.

Tiger, Ltd. had actual manufacturing overhead costs of $1,210,000 and a predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per machine hour. Tiger, Ltd. worked 290,000 machine hours during the period. Tiger’s manufacturing overhead is

a. $50,000 overapplied.

b. $50,000 underapplied.

c. $60,000 overapplied.

d. $60,000 underapplied.

Quick Check

Overhead Applied $4.00 per hour × 290,000 hours = $1,160,000

Underapplied Overhead $1,210,000 - $1,160,000 = $50,000

Overhead Applied $4.00 per hour × 290,000 hours = $1,160,000

Underapplied Overhead $1,210,000 - $1,160,000 = $50,000

Page 58: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 58

Disposition of Under- or Overapplied Overhead

$30,000 may beclosed directly to

cost of goods sold.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of Goods Sold

Harvey Fresh’s Method

Work inProcessWork inProcess

FinishedGoods

FinishedGoods

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of Goods Sold

$30,000may be allocated

to these accounts.

OROROROR

Page 59: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 59

Disposition of Under/Overapplied Overhead

Harvey Fresh ’sMfg. Overhead

Actualoverhead

costs

$120,000$30,000

overapplied

Harvey Fresh’s Costof Goods Sold

Unadjusted Balance

AdjustedBalance

$30,000

$30,000

Overhead applied

to products

$150,000

Page 60: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 60

Under/Overapplied Adjustment Through COGS

If Harvey Fresh’s overapplied adjustment is directly through COGS, then its profit will be as follows:

Page 61: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 61

Allocating Under- or Overapplied Overhead Between Accounts

In Year 1, Harvey Fresh ’s overhead applied in ending Work in Process Inventory, ending Finished Goods Inventory, and Cost of Goods Sold is shown below:

Amount Percent of

Total Allocation of $30,000

Work in process -$ 0% 3,000$ Finished Goods 30,000 20% 9,000 Cost of Goods Sold 120,000 80% 18,000

Total overhead applied 150,000$ 100% 30,000$

Page 62: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 62

Allocating Under- or Overapplied Overhead Between Accounts

Amount Percent of

Total

Allocation of $30,000

overapplied overhead

Work in process -$ 0% -$ Finished Goods 30,000 20% 6,000 Cost of Goods Sold 120,000 80% 24,000

Total 150,000$ 100% 30,000$

We would complete the following allocation of $30,000 overapplied overhead:

20% × $30,00020% × $30,000

Page 63: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 63

Allocating Under- or Overapplied Overhead Between Accounts

Amount Percent of

Total Allocation of $30,000

Work in process -$ 0% -$ Finished Goods 30,000 20% 6,000 Cost of Goods Sold 120,000 80% 24,000

Total 150,000$ 100% 30,000$

Page 64: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 64

Under/Overapplied Adjustment Through the Proportional Allocation Method

Net result of $24,000 adjusted against COGS

Net Operating Income is different from the one with adjustment directly through COGS ($150,000)

Page 65: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 65

Revisit the earlier Tiger, Ltd. exercise on slide 56. Before any manufacturing fixed overhead over/underapplied adjustment, the relevant figures are as follows:

Work in process 20,000

Finished goods 30,000

Cost of goods sold 50,000

How much should Tiger’s over/underapplied manufacturing fixed overhead be adjusted to Finished Goods (FG) if the proportional allocation method is used?

a. $15,000 more (i.e. debit) to FG.

b. $15,000 less (i.e. credit) to FG.

c. $30,000 more (i.e. debit) to FG.

d. $30,000 less (i.e. credit) to FG.

Revisit the earlier Tiger, Ltd. exercise on slide 56. Before any manufacturing fixed overhead over/underapplied adjustment, the relevant figures are as follows:

Work in process 20,000

Finished goods 30,000

Cost of goods sold 50,000

How much should Tiger’s over/underapplied manufacturing fixed overhead be adjusted to Finished Goods (FG) if the proportional allocation method is used?

a. $15,000 more (i.e. debit) to FG.

b. $15,000 less (i.e. credit) to FG.

c. $30,000 more (i.e. debit) to FG.

d. $30,000 less (i.e. credit) to FG.

Quick Check

Page 66: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 66

Revisit the earlier Tiger, Ltd. exercise on slide 56. Before any manufacturing fixed overhead over/underapplied adjustment, the relevant figures are as follows:

Work in process 20,000

Finished goods 30,000

Cost of goods sold 50,000

How much shouldTiger’s over/underapplied manufacturing fixed overhead be adjusted to Finished Goods (FG) if the proportional allocation method is used?

a. $15,000 more (i.e. debit) to FG.

b. $15,000 less (i.e. credit) to FG.

c. $30,000 more (i.e. debit) to FG.

d. $30,000 less (i.e. credit) to FG.

Revisit the earlier Tiger, Ltd. exercise on slide 56. Before any manufacturing fixed overhead over/underapplied adjustment, the relevant figures are as follows:

Work in process 20,000

Finished goods 30,000

Cost of goods sold 50,000

How much shouldTiger’s over/underapplied manufacturing fixed overhead be adjusted to Finished Goods (FG) if the proportional allocation method is used?

a. $15,000 more (i.e. debit) to FG.

b. $15,000 less (i.e. credit) to FG.

c. $30,000 more (i.e. debit) to FG.

d. $30,000 less (i.e. credit) to FG.

Quick Check

Amount Percent of

Total

Underapplied

of $50,000 Work in process 20,000$ 20% 10,000$ Finished Goods 30,000 30% 15,000 Cost of Goods Sold 50,000 50% 25,000

Total 100,000$ 100% 50,000$

Page 67: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 67

Revisit the earlier Tiger, Ltd. exercise on slide 55. Before any manufacturing fixed overhead over/underapplied adjustment, the relevant figures are as follows:

Work in process $20,000

Finished goods $30,000

Cost of goods sold $50,000

How much shouldTiger’s over/underapplied manufacturing fixed overhead be adjusted to Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) if the proportional allocation method is used?

a. $50,000 more (i.e. debit) to COGS.

b. $50,000 less (i.e. credit) to COGS.

c. $25,000 more (i.e. debit) to COGS.

d. $25,000 less (i.e. credit) to COGS.

Revisit the earlier Tiger, Ltd. exercise on slide 55. Before any manufacturing fixed overhead over/underapplied adjustment, the relevant figures are as follows:

Work in process $20,000

Finished goods $30,000

Cost of goods sold $50,000

How much shouldTiger’s over/underapplied manufacturing fixed overhead be adjusted to Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) if the proportional allocation method is used?

a. $50,000 more (i.e. debit) to COGS.

b. $50,000 less (i.e. credit) to COGS.

c. $25,000 more (i.e. debit) to COGS.

d. $25,000 less (i.e. credit) to COGS.

Quick Check

Page 68: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 68

Revisit the earlier Tiger, Ltd. exercise on slide 56. Before any manufacturing fixed overhead over/underapplied adjustment, the relevant figures are as follows:

Work in process 20,000

Finished goods 30,000

Cost of goods sold 50,000

How much shouldTiger’s over/underapplied manufacturing fixed overhead be adjusted to Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) if the proportional allocation method is used?

a. $50,000 more (i.e. debit) to COGS.

b. $50,000 less (i.e. credit) to COGS.

c. $25,000 more (i.e. debit) to COGS.

d. $25,000 less (i.e. credit) to COGS.

Revisit the earlier Tiger, Ltd. exercise on slide 56. Before any manufacturing fixed overhead over/underapplied adjustment, the relevant figures are as follows:

Work in process 20,000

Finished goods 30,000

Cost of goods sold 50,000

How much shouldTiger’s over/underapplied manufacturing fixed overhead be adjusted to Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) if the proportional allocation method is used?

a. $50,000 more (i.e. debit) to COGS.

b. $50,000 less (i.e. credit) to COGS.

c. $25,000 more (i.e. debit) to COGS.

d. $25,000 less (i.e. credit) to COGS.

Quick Check

Amount Percent of

Total

Underapplied

of $50,000 Work in process 20,000$ 20% 10,000$ Finished Goods 30,000 30% 15,000 Cost of Goods Sold 50,000 50% 25,000

Total 100,000$ 100% 50,000$

Page 69: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 69

Learning Objective 8

Explain the potential problems of using absorption costing.

Page 70: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 70

Creating Extra Profit Without Increase In Sales

Continue with the Harvey Fresh example (slides 54, and 58 to 64). Assume the company had the same sales, revenue and cost structure but produced 35,000 units (instead of 25,000 units) to increase ending inventory by 10,000 units.

Page 71: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 71

Overapplied adjustments required Harvey Fresh’s actual fixed manufacturing overhead

= $120,000 Based on the original scenario, the applied overhead

was based on actual production of 25,000 units at $6 each (slide 19), giving rise $150,000 being applied to the items produced. Therefore, it was overapplied by $30,000 ($150,000 applied - $120,000 actual).

Based on the new scenario, the applied overhead was based on actual production of 35,000 units at $6 each (slide 19), giving rise $210,000 being applied to the production. Therefore, it was overapplied by $90,000 ($210,000 applied - $120,000 actual).

Page 72: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 72

Profit Arising from Ending Inventory Value

The additional profit ($60,000) is the same amount as the additional overapplied adjustment ($90,000 - $30,000).

The overapplied adjustment is to make good of the applied fixed overhead to match with the actual overhead spent.

The additional profit actually arises from the additional fixed overhead (based on the predetermined overhead rate, POHR) carried forward through the change in ending inventory, amounting the same as the over/underapplied fixed overhead adjustment if the adjustment is written off directly to cost of goods sold.

If the adjustment is done through the proportional method shown in slides 61– 64, then the increased profit will not match the overapplied adjustment.

Page 73: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 73

Value of Ending Inventory

Page 74: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 74

Use of Variable CostingContinue with the Harvey Fresh example but presenting the results using the variable costing format.

Profits remain the same despite of changing quantity in production and ending inventory

Use of Variable Costing can avoid Profit inflation through producing more inventories

Page 75: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 75

Overapplied and Underapplied Manufacturing Overhead - Summary

Alternative 1 Alternative 2If Manufacturing Close to Cost ProportionalOverhead is . . . of Goods Sold Allocation

UNDERAPPLIED INCREASE INCREASECost of Goods Sold Work in Process

(Applied OH is less Finished Goodsthan actual OH) Cost of Goods Sold

OVERAPPLIED DECREASE DECREASECost of Goods Sold Work in Process

(Applied OH is greater Finished Goodsthan actual OH) Cost of Goods Sold

Harvey Fresh’s Method

More accurate but more complex to compute.More accurate but more complex to compute.

Page 76: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 76

Quick Check

What effect will the overapplied overhead have on Harvey’s net operating income?

a. Net operating income will increase.b. Net operating income will be unaffected.c. Net operating income will decrease.

What effect will the overapplied overhead have on Harvey’s net operating income?

a. Net operating income will increase.b. Net operating income will be unaffected.c. Net operating income will decrease.

Page 77: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 77

Quick Check

What effect will the overapplied overhead have on Harvey’s net operating income?

a. Net operating income will increase.b. Net operating income will be unaffected.c. Net operating income will decrease.

What effect will the overapplied overhead have on Harvey’s net operating income?

a. Net operating income will increase.b. Net operating income will be unaffected.c. Net operating income will decrease.

Page 78: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 78

May be more complex May be more complex but . . .but . . .

May be more complex May be more complex but . . .but . . .

Multiple Predetermined Overhead Rates

To this point, we have assumed that there is a single To this point, we have assumed that there is a single predetermined overhead rate called a plantwide predetermined overhead rate called a plantwide

overhead rate.overhead rate.

To this point, we have assumed that there is a single To this point, we have assumed that there is a single predetermined overhead rate called a plantwide predetermined overhead rate called a plantwide

overhead rate.overhead rate.

Large companies Large companies often use multiple often use multiple

predetermined predetermined overhead rates.overhead rates.

Large companies Large companies often use multiple often use multiple

predetermined predetermined overhead rates.overhead rates.

May be more accurate because May be more accurate because it reflects differences across it reflects differences across

departments.departments.

May be more accurate because May be more accurate because it reflects differences across it reflects differences across

departments.departments.

Page 79: Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 5.

Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 79

End of Chapter 5