Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for...
-
Upload
paula-cunningham -
Category
Documents
-
view
268 -
download
4
Transcript of Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & Yuen McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Variable Costing: A Tool for...
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia)
Variable Costing:A Tool for Management
Chapter 5
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 2
Learning Objective 1
Explain how variable Explain how variable costing differs from costing differs from
absorption costing and absorption costing and compute unit product compute unit product
costs under each costs under each method.method.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 3
Absorption CostingIncome Statement
Variable CostingIncome Statement
Sales Sales
Direct materials
Direct labor Cost of Goods Sold(Variable Product Costs)
Cost of Goods Sold Variable manufacturing overhead(Fixed and variable
product costs)Variable
Selliing & Administrative
expenses
Gross Profit (Gross Margin)
Fixed manufacturing overhead Contribution Margin
Fixed Manufacturing
overhead
Selling & Adminstrative
expensesSelling & Administrative expenses
Fixed Selling &
Administrative expenses
Net O perating Income Net O perating Income
KEY: = Period expenses
Overview of Absorption and Variable Costing
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 4
Quick Check
Which method will produce the highest values for work in process and finished goods inventories?
a. Absorption costing.
b. Variable costing.
c. They produce the same values for these inventories.
d. It depends. . .
Which method will produce the highest values for work in process and finished goods inventories?
a. Absorption costing.
b. Variable costing.
c. They produce the same values for these inventories.
d. It depends. . .
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 5
Which method will produce the highest values for work in process and finished goods inventories?
a. Absorption costing.
b. Variable costing.
c. They produce the same values for these inventories.
d. It depends. . .
Which method will produce the highest values for work in process and finished goods inventories?
a. Absorption costing.
b. Variable costing.
c. They produce the same values for these inventories.
d. It depends. . .
Quick Check
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 6
Harvey Company produces a single productwith the following information available:
Unit Cost Computations
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 7
Unit product cost is determined as follows:
Under absorption costing, all production costs, variable and fixed, are included when determining unit product
cost. Under variable costing, only the variable production costs are included in product costs.
Unit Cost Computations
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 8
Learning Objective 2
Prepare income Prepare income statements using both statements using both variable and absorption variable and absorption
costing.costing.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 9
Income Comparison ofAbsorption and Variable Costing
Let’s assume the following additional information for Harvey Company. 20,000 units were sold during the year at a price
of $30 each. There is no beginning inventory.
Now, let’s compute net operatingincome using both absorptionand variable costing.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 10
Absorption Costing
Fixed manufacturing overhead deferred in inventory is 5,000 units × $6 = $30,000.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 11
Variable CostingSales (20,000 × $30) 600,000$ Less variable expenses: Beginning inventory -$ Add COGM (25,000 × $10) 250,000 Goods available for sale 250,000 Less ending inventory (5,000 × $10) 50,000 Variable cost of goods sold 200,000 Variable selling & administrative expenses (20,000 × $3) 60,000 260,000 Contribution margin 340,000 Less fixed expenses: Manufacturing overhead 150,000$ Selling & administrative expenses 100,000 250,000 Net operating income 90,000$
Variable CostingSales (20,000 × $30) 600,000$ Less variable expenses: Beginning inventory -$ Add COGM (25,000 × $10) 250,000 Goods available for sale 250,000 Less ending inventory (5,000 × $10) 50,000 Variable cost of goods sold 200,000 Variable selling & administrative expenses (20,000 × $3) 60,000 260,000 Contribution margin 340,000 Less fixed expenses: Manufacturing overhead 150,000$ Selling & administrative expenses 100,000 250,000 Net operating income 90,000$
Variablemanufacturing
costs only.
All fixedmanufacturing
overhead isexpensed.
Variable Costing
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 12
Learning Objective 3
Reconcile variable Reconcile variable costing and absorption costing and absorption costing net operating costing net operating incomes and explain incomes and explain why the two amounts why the two amounts
differ.differ.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 13
Comparing the Two Methods
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 14
Variable costing net operating income 90,000$ Add: Fixed mfg. overhead costs deferred in inventory (5,000 units × $6 per unit) 30,000 Absorption costing net operating income 120,000$
Variable costing net operating income 90,000$ Add: Fixed mfg. overhead costs deferred in inventory (5,000 units × $6 per unit) 30,000 Absorption costing net operating income 120,000$
Fixed mfg. overhead $150,000 Units produced 25,000 units
= = $6 per unit
We can reconcile the difference betweenabsorption and variable income as follows:
Comparing the Two Methods
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 15
Extended Comparisons of Income Data Harvey Company – Year Two
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 16
Unit Cost Computations
Since the variable costs per unit, total fixed costs, Since the variable costs per unit, total fixed costs, and the number of units produced remained and the number of units produced remained unchanged, the unit cost computations also unchanged, the unit cost computations also
remain unchanged.remain unchanged.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 17
Absorption CostingSales (30,000 × $30) 900,000$ Less cost of goods sold: Beg. inventory (5,000 × $16) 80,000$ Add COGM (25,000 × $16) 400,000 Goods available for sale 480,000 Less ending inventory - 480,000 Gross margin 420,000 Less selling & admin. exp. Variable (30,000 × $3) 90,000$ Fixed 100,000 190,000 Net operating income 230,000$
Absorption CostingSales (30,000 × $30) 900,000$ Less cost of goods sold: Beg. inventory (5,000 × $16) 80,000$ Add COGM (25,000 × $16) 400,000 Goods available for sale 480,000 Less ending inventory - 480,000 Gross margin 420,000 Less selling & admin. exp. Variable (30,000 × $3) 90,000$ Fixed 100,000 190,000 Net operating income 230,000$
Absorption Costing
Fixed manufacturing overhead released from inventory is 5,000 units × $6 = $30,000.
Unit product
cost.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 18
Variable Costing
All fixedmanufacturing
overhead isexpensed.
Variablemanufacturing
costs only.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 19
Variable costing net operating income 260,000$ Deduct: Fixed manufacturing overhead costs released from inventory (5,000 units × $6 per unit) 30,000 Absorption costing net operating income 230,000$
We can reconcile the difference betweenabsorption and variable income as follows:
Fixed mfg. overhead $150,000 Units produced 25,000 units
= = $6 per unit
Comparing the Two Methods
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 20
Comparing the Two Methods
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 21
Summary of Key Insights
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 22
Learning Objective 4
Understand the Understand the advantages and advantages and
disadvantages of both disadvantages of both variable and absorption variable and absorption
costing.costing.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 23
Impact on the Manager
Opponents of absorption costing argue thatshifting fixed manufacturing overhead costs
between periods can lead to faulty decisions.
Opponents of absorption costing argue thatshifting fixed manufacturing overhead costs
between periods can lead to faulty decisions.
These opponents argue that variable costing incomestatements are easier to understand because net operating
income is only affected by changes in unit sales. Thisproduces net operating income figures that are
consistent with managers’ expectations.
These opponents argue that variable costing incomestatements are easier to understand because net operating
income is only affected by changes in unit sales. Thisproduces net operating income figures that are
consistent with managers’ expectations.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 24
CVP Analysis, Decision Makingand Absorption costing
Absorption costing does not dovetail with CVP analysis, nor does it support decision making. It treats fixed
manufacturing overhead as a variable cost. It assigns per unit fixed manufacturing overhead costs to production.
Treating fixed manufacturing overhead as a variable cost can:
• Lead to faulty pricing decisions and faulty keep-or-drop decisions.
Treating fixed manufacturing overhead as a variable cost can:
• Lead to faulty pricing decisions and faulty keep-or-drop decisions.
Assigning per unit fixed manufacturing overhead costs to production can:
• Potentially produce positive net operating income even when the number of units sold is less than the breakeven point.
Assigning per unit fixed manufacturing overhead costs to production can:
• Potentially produce positive net operating income even when the number of units sold is less than the breakeven point.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 25
External Reporting and Income Taxes
To conform toTo conform toIFRS and US GAAP IFRS and US GAAP
requirements, absorption costing requirements, absorption costing must be used formust be used for
external financial reports.external financial reports.
To conform toTo conform toIFRS and US GAAP IFRS and US GAAP
requirements, absorption costing requirements, absorption costing must be used formust be used for
external financial reports.external financial reports.
In many countries, including US,
absorption costing must beused when filling out income tax returns.
In many countries, including US,
absorption costing must beused when filling out income tax returns.
Since top executivesare typically evaluated based on
earnings reported to shareholdersin external reports, they may feel that
decisions should be based on absorption costing data.
Since top executivesare typically evaluated based on
earnings reported to shareholdersin external reports, they may feel that
decisions should be based on absorption costing data.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 26
Advantages of Variable Costingand the Contribution Approach
Advantages
Management findsit more useful.
Consistent withCVP analysis.
Net operating income is closer to
net cash flow.
Profit is not affected bychanges in inventories.
Consistent with standardcosts and flexible budgeting.
Impact of fixedcosts on profitsemphasized.
Easier to estimate profitabilityof products and segments.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 27
VariableCosting
Variable versus Absorption Costing
Fixed manufacturingcosts must be assignedto products to properlymatch revenues and
costs.
Fixed manufacturing costs are capacity costs
and will be incurredeven if nothing is
produced.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 28
Variable Costing and the Theory of Constraints (TOC)
Companies involved in TOC use a form of variable costing. However, one difference of the TOC approach is that it treats direct labor as a fixed cost for three reasons:
Many companies have a commitment to guarantee workers a minimum number of paid hours.
Direct labor is usually not the constraint.
TOC emphasizes the role direct laborers play in driving continuous improvement. Since layoffs often devastate morale, managers involved in TOC are extremely reluctant to lay off employees.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 29
Impact of Lean Production
When companies use Lean Production . . .
Productiontends to equal
sales . . .
So, the difference between variable andabsorption income tends to disappear.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 30
Learning Objective 5
Compute predetermined Compute predetermined overhead rates and explain overhead rates and explain
why estimated overhead why estimated overhead costs (rather than actual costs (rather than actual
overhead costs) being used overhead costs) being used in the costing process.in the costing process.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 31
Why Use an Allocation Base?
Manufacturing overhead is applied to products/jobs Manufacturing overhead is applied to products/jobs that are in process. An allocation base, such as that are in process. An allocation base, such as
direct labor hours, direct labor dollars, or machine direct labor hours, direct labor dollars, or machine hours, is used to assign manufacturing overhead to hours, is used to assign manufacturing overhead to
individual products/jobs.individual products/jobs.
Manufacturing overhead is applied to products/jobs Manufacturing overhead is applied to products/jobs that are in process. An allocation base, such as that are in process. An allocation base, such as
direct labor hours, direct labor dollars, or machine direct labor hours, direct labor dollars, or machine hours, is used to assign manufacturing overhead to hours, is used to assign manufacturing overhead to
individual products/jobs.individual products/jobs.
We use an allocation base because:
1.It is impossible or difficult to trace overhead costs to particular products/jobs.
2.Manufacturing overhead consists of many different items ranging from the grease used in machines to production manager’s salary.
3.Many types of manufacturing overhead costs are fixed even though output fluctuates during the period.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 32
The predetermined overhead rate (POHR) used to apply overhead to products/jobs is determined
before the period begins.
Manufacturing Overhead Application
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 33
Using a predetermined rate makes itpossible to estimate total product/job costs sooner.
Actual overhead for the period is notknown until the end of the period.
The Need for a POHR
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 34
Determining Predetermined Overhead RatesPredetermined overhead rates are calculated
using a three-step process.
Estimate the level of
production for the period.
Estimate the level of
production for the period.
Estimate total amount of the allocation base
for the period.
Estimate total amount of the allocation base
for the period.
Estimate total manufacturing
overhead costs.
Estimate total manufacturing
overhead costs.
POHR = ÷
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 35
Actual amount of allocation is based upon the actual level of
activity (normal costing system).
Actual amount of allocation is based upon the actual level of
activity (normal costing system).
Based on estimates, and determined before the
period begins.
Based on estimates, and determined before the
period begins.
Application of Manufacturing Overhead
Overhead applied = POHR × Actual activity
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 36
For each direct labor hour worked on a particular product, $3.00 of factory overhead will be applied to it. For product valuation, it must be valued by unit. In this case, assume each unit requires 2 direct labor hours. Hence,
each unit of the product absorbs $6 predetermined overhead. In order to match back with Harvey’s example, we further assume that variable
manufacturing overhead = 0. So the predetermined overhead represents only fixed manufacturing overhead cost as shown in slides 14 & 19.
For each direct labor hour worked on a particular product, $3.00 of factory overhead will be applied to it. For product valuation, it must be valued by unit. In this case, assume each unit requires 2 direct labor hours. Hence,
each unit of the product absorbs $6 predetermined overhead. In order to match back with Harvey’s example, we further assume that variable
manufacturing overhead = 0. So the predetermined overhead represents only fixed manufacturing overhead cost as shown in slides 14 & 19.
Overhead Application Rate for the Harvey Example
POHR = $3.00 per DLH
$150,000
50,000 direct labor hours (DLH)POHR =
Estimated total manufacturingoverhead cost for the coming period
Estimated total units in theallocation base for the coming period
POHR =
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 37
Learning Objective 6
Understand the implications of basing the predetermined overhead rate on activity at capacity rather than on estimated activity for the period.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 38
Predetermined Overhead Rate and Capacity
Calculating predetermined overhead rates using an estimated, or budgeted amount of the allocation base has been criticized because:
1.Basing the predetermined overhead rate upon budgeted activity results in product costs that fluctuate depending upon the activity level.
2.Calculating predetermined rates based upon budgeted activity charges products for costs that they do not use.
Calculating predetermined overhead rates using an estimated, or budgeted amount of the allocation base has been criticized because:
1.Basing the predetermined overhead rate upon budgeted activity results in product costs that fluctuate depending upon the activity level.
2.Calculating predetermined rates based upon budgeted activity charges products for costs that they do not use.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 39
Capacity-Based Overhead Rates
Criticisms can be overcome by using Criticisms can be overcome by using estimated total units in the allocation base estimated total units in the allocation base
at capacity in the denominator of the at capacity in the denominator of the predetermined overhead rate calculation.predetermined overhead rate calculation.
Criticisms can be overcome by using Criticisms can be overcome by using estimated total units in the allocation base estimated total units in the allocation base
at capacity in the denominator of the at capacity in the denominator of the predetermined overhead rate calculation.predetermined overhead rate calculation.
Let’s look at the difference!Let’s look at the difference!
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 40
An Example
Equipment is leased for $100,000 per year. Running at full capacity, 50,000 units may be produced. The company
estimates that 40,000 units will be produced and sold next year. What is
the predetermined overhead rate?
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 41
An Example
Equipment is leased for $100,000 per year. Running at full capacity, 50,000 units may be
produced. The company estimates that 40,000 units will be produced and sold next year.
TraditionalMethod
= $2.50 per unit$100,000
40,000=
Capacity Method
= $2.00 per unit$100,000
50,000=
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 42
Quick Check
Barossa Winery in Barossa Valley, South Australia, leases an automatic corking machine for $100,000 per year. At full capacity, it can cork 50,000 cases of wine per year. The company estimates 40,000 cases of wine will be produced and sold next year. What is the predetermined overhead rate based on the estimated number of cases of wine?a. $2.00 per case.
b. $2.50 per case.
c. $4.00 per case.
Barossa Winery in Barossa Valley, South Australia, leases an automatic corking machine for $100,000 per year. At full capacity, it can cork 50,000 cases of wine per year. The company estimates 40,000 cases of wine will be produced and sold next year. What is the predetermined overhead rate based on the estimated number of cases of wine?a. $2.00 per case.
b. $2.50 per case.
c. $4.00 per case.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 43
Barossa Winery in Barossa Valley, South Australia, leases an automatic corking machine for $100,000 per year. At full capacity, it can cork 50,000 cases of wine per year. The company estimates 40,000 cases of wine will be produced and sold next year. What is the predetermined overhead rate based on the estimated number of cases of wine?a. $2.00 per case.b. $2.50 per case.c. $4.00 per case.
Barossa Winery in Barossa Valley, South Australia, leases an automatic corking machine for $100,000 per year. At full capacity, it can cork 50,000 cases of wine per year. The company estimates 40,000 cases of wine will be produced and sold next year. What is the predetermined overhead rate based on the estimated number of cases of wine?a. $2.00 per case.b. $2.50 per case.c. $4.00 per case.
Quick Check
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 44
Quick Check
Barossa Winery in Barossa Valley, South Australia, leases an automatic corking machine for $100,000 per year. At full capacity, it can cork 50,000 cases of wine per year. The company estimates 40,000 cases of wine will be produced and sold next year. What is the predetermined overhead rate based on the number of cases of wine at capacity?a. $2.00 per case.
b. $2.50 per case.
c. $4.00 per case.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 45
Barossa Winery in Barossa Valley, South Australia, leases an automatic corking machine for $100,000 per year. At full capacity, it can cork 50,000 cases of wine per year. The company estimates 40,000 cases of wine will be produced and sold next year. What is the predetermined overhead rate based on the number of cases of wine at capacity?a. $2.00 per case.b. $2.50 per case.c. $4.00 per case.
Quick Check
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 46
Quick Check
When capacity is used in the denominator of the predetermined rate, what happens to the predetermined overhead rate as estimated activity decreases?a. The predetermined overhead rate goes up when activity
goes down.
b. The predetermined overhead rate stays the same because it is not affected by changes in activity.
c. The predetermined overhead rate goes down when activity goes down.
When capacity is used in the denominator of the predetermined rate, what happens to the predetermined overhead rate as estimated activity decreases?a. The predetermined overhead rate goes up when activity
goes down.
b. The predetermined overhead rate stays the same because it is not affected by changes in activity.
c. The predetermined overhead rate goes down when activity goes down.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 47
When capacity is used in the denominator of the predetermined rate, what happens to the predetermined overhead rate as estimated activity decreases?a. The predetermined overhead rate goes up when
activity goes down.b. The predetermined overhead rate stays the
same because it is not affected by changes in activity.
c. The predetermined overhead rate goes down when activity goes down.
When capacity is used in the denominator of the predetermined rate, what happens to the predetermined overhead rate as estimated activity decreases?a. The predetermined overhead rate goes up when
activity goes down.b. The predetermined overhead rate stays the
same because it is not affected by changes in activity.
c. The predetermined overhead rate goes down when activity goes down.
Quick Check
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 48
Quick Check When estimated activity is used in the
denominator of the predetermined rate, what happens to the predetermined overhead rate as estimated activity decreases?a. The predetermined overhead rate goes up when
activity goes down.
b. The predetermined overhead rate stays the same because it is not affected by changes in activity.
c. The predetermined overhead rate goes down when activity goes down.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 49
When estimated activity is used in the denominator of the predetermined rate, what happens to the predetermined overhead rate as estimated activity decreases?a. The predetermined overhead rate goes up
when activity goes down.b. The predetermined overhead rate stays the
same because it is not affected by changes in activity.
c. The predetermined overhead rate goes down when activity goes down.
Quick Check
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 50
Income Statement Preparation – Capacity
Actual volume 40,000 casesSelling price $40.00 per caseVariable production cost $24.00 per caseFixed manufacturing overhead $100,000 per yearCapacity 50,000 casesPredetermined overhead rate $2.00 per caseFixed selling and admin. expense $500,000 per year
Revenue 1,600,000$ Cost of goods sold 1,040,000 Gross margin 560,000 Cost of idle capacity 20,000 Selling and admin. expense 500,000 Net operating income 40,000$
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 51
Income Statement Preparation – Traditional
Actual volume 40,000 casesSelling price $40.00 per caseVariable production cost $24.00 per caseFixed manufacturing overhead $100,000 per yearCapacity 40,000 casesPredetermined overhead rate $2.50 per caseFixed selling and admin. expense $500,000 per year
Revenue 1,600,000$ Cost of goods sold 1,060,000 Gross margin 540,000 Cost of idle capacity - Selling and admin. expense 500,000 Net operating income 40,000$
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 52
Learning Objective 7
Compute underapplied or Compute underapplied or overapplied overhead cost and overapplied overhead cost and
prepare the journal entry to prepare the journal entry to close the balance in close the balance in
Manufacturing Overhead to the Manufacturing Overhead to the appropriate accounts.appropriate accounts.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 53
Problems of Overhead Application
The difference between the overhead cost applied to Work in Process and the actual overhead costs of a
period is referred to as either underapplied or overapplied overhead.
Underapplied overhead exists when the amount of
overhead applied to products/ jobs during the
period using the predetermined overhead rate is less than the total
amount of overhead actually incurred during the period.
Underapplied overhead exists when the amount of
overhead applied to products/ jobs during the
period using the predetermined overhead rate is less than the total
amount of overhead actually incurred during the period.
Overapplied overheadOverapplied overhead exists when the amount of exists when the amount of
overhead applied to overhead applied to products/jobs during the products/jobs during the
period using the period using the predetermined overhead predetermined overhead
rate is rate is greater thangreater than the total the total amount of overhead actually amount of overhead actually incurred during the period.incurred during the period.
Overapplied overheadOverapplied overhead exists when the amount of exists when the amount of
overhead applied to overhead applied to products/jobs during the products/jobs during the
period using the period using the predetermined overhead predetermined overhead
rate is rate is greater thangreater than the total the total amount of overhead actually amount of overhead actually incurred during the period.incurred during the period.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 54
Recall the Harvey example between slides 9 and 36. Recall the Harvey example between slides 9 and 36. Let’s rename the example as Let’s rename the example as Harvey Fresh and and
assume assume actual overheadactual overhead for the year was for the year was $120,000$120,000 (instead of $150,000 in the original Harvey example). (instead of $150,000 in the original Harvey example). The total direct labor hours incurred were The total direct labor hours incurred were 50,00050,000. The . The
rest remains the same.rest remains the same.
How much total overhead was applied to How much total overhead was applied to Harvey FreshHarvey Fresh’s ’s products during the year? Use Harvey’s predetermined products during the year? Use Harvey’s predetermined
overhead rate of $3.00 per direct labor hour. overhead rate of $3.00 per direct labor hour.
Overhead Application Example
Overhead Applied During the PeriodApplied Overhead = POHR × Actual Direct Labor Hours
Applied Overhead = $3.00 per DLH × 50,000 DLH = $150,000
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 55
Harvey FreshHarvey Fresh’s ’s actual overheadactual overhead for the year was for the year was $120,000$120,000 with a total of with a total of 50,00050,000 direct labor hours direct labor hours
worked on products.worked on products.
How much total overhead was applied to How much total overhead was applied to Harvey FreshHarvey Fresh’s’s products during the year? Use Harvey’s products during the year? Use Harvey’s
predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per direct labor predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per direct labor hour. hour. Overhead Applied During the Period
Applied Overhead = POHR × Actual Direct Labor Hours
Applied Overhead = $3.00 per DLH × 50,000 DLH = $150,000
Overhead Application Example
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 56
Tiger, Ltd. had actual manufacturing overhead costs of $1,210,000 and a predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per machine hour. Tiger, Ltd. worked 290,000 machine hours during the period. Tiger’s manufacturing overhead is
a. $50,000 overapplied.
b. $50,000 underapplied.
c. $60,000 overapplied.
d. $60,000 underapplied.
Tiger, Ltd. had actual manufacturing overhead costs of $1,210,000 and a predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per machine hour. Tiger, Ltd. worked 290,000 machine hours during the period. Tiger’s manufacturing overhead is
a. $50,000 overapplied.
b. $50,000 underapplied.
c. $60,000 overapplied.
d. $60,000 underapplied.
Quick Check
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 57
Tiger, Ltd. had actual manufacturing overhead costs of $1,210,000 and a predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per machine hour. Tiger, Ltd. worked 290,000 machine hours during the period. Tiger’s manufacturing overhead is
a. $50,000 overapplied.
b. $50,000 underapplied.
c. $60,000 overapplied.
d. $60,000 underapplied.
Tiger, Ltd. had actual manufacturing overhead costs of $1,210,000 and a predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per machine hour. Tiger, Ltd. worked 290,000 machine hours during the period. Tiger’s manufacturing overhead is
a. $50,000 overapplied.
b. $50,000 underapplied.
c. $60,000 overapplied.
d. $60,000 underapplied.
Quick Check
Overhead Applied $4.00 per hour × 290,000 hours = $1,160,000
Underapplied Overhead $1,210,000 - $1,160,000 = $50,000
Overhead Applied $4.00 per hour × 290,000 hours = $1,160,000
Underapplied Overhead $1,210,000 - $1,160,000 = $50,000
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 58
Disposition of Under- or Overapplied Overhead
$30,000 may beclosed directly to
cost of goods sold.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of Goods Sold
Harvey Fresh’s Method
Work inProcessWork inProcess
FinishedGoods
FinishedGoods
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of Goods Sold
$30,000may be allocated
to these accounts.
OROROROR
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 59
Disposition of Under/Overapplied Overhead
Harvey Fresh ’sMfg. Overhead
Actualoverhead
costs
$120,000$30,000
overapplied
Harvey Fresh’s Costof Goods Sold
Unadjusted Balance
AdjustedBalance
$30,000
$30,000
Overhead applied
to products
$150,000
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 60
Under/Overapplied Adjustment Through COGS
If Harvey Fresh’s overapplied adjustment is directly through COGS, then its profit will be as follows:
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 61
Allocating Under- or Overapplied Overhead Between Accounts
In Year 1, Harvey Fresh ’s overhead applied in ending Work in Process Inventory, ending Finished Goods Inventory, and Cost of Goods Sold is shown below:
Amount Percent of
Total Allocation of $30,000
Work in process -$ 0% 3,000$ Finished Goods 30,000 20% 9,000 Cost of Goods Sold 120,000 80% 18,000
Total overhead applied 150,000$ 100% 30,000$
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 62
Allocating Under- or Overapplied Overhead Between Accounts
Amount Percent of
Total
Allocation of $30,000
overapplied overhead
Work in process -$ 0% -$ Finished Goods 30,000 20% 6,000 Cost of Goods Sold 120,000 80% 24,000
Total 150,000$ 100% 30,000$
We would complete the following allocation of $30,000 overapplied overhead:
20% × $30,00020% × $30,000
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 63
Allocating Under- or Overapplied Overhead Between Accounts
Amount Percent of
Total Allocation of $30,000
Work in process -$ 0% -$ Finished Goods 30,000 20% 6,000 Cost of Goods Sold 120,000 80% 24,000
Total 150,000$ 100% 30,000$
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 64
Under/Overapplied Adjustment Through the Proportional Allocation Method
Net result of $24,000 adjusted against COGS
Net Operating Income is different from the one with adjustment directly through COGS ($150,000)
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 65
Revisit the earlier Tiger, Ltd. exercise on slide 56. Before any manufacturing fixed overhead over/underapplied adjustment, the relevant figures are as follows:
Work in process 20,000
Finished goods 30,000
Cost of goods sold 50,000
How much should Tiger’s over/underapplied manufacturing fixed overhead be adjusted to Finished Goods (FG) if the proportional allocation method is used?
a. $15,000 more (i.e. debit) to FG.
b. $15,000 less (i.e. credit) to FG.
c. $30,000 more (i.e. debit) to FG.
d. $30,000 less (i.e. credit) to FG.
Revisit the earlier Tiger, Ltd. exercise on slide 56. Before any manufacturing fixed overhead over/underapplied adjustment, the relevant figures are as follows:
Work in process 20,000
Finished goods 30,000
Cost of goods sold 50,000
How much should Tiger’s over/underapplied manufacturing fixed overhead be adjusted to Finished Goods (FG) if the proportional allocation method is used?
a. $15,000 more (i.e. debit) to FG.
b. $15,000 less (i.e. credit) to FG.
c. $30,000 more (i.e. debit) to FG.
d. $30,000 less (i.e. credit) to FG.
Quick Check
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 66
Revisit the earlier Tiger, Ltd. exercise on slide 56. Before any manufacturing fixed overhead over/underapplied adjustment, the relevant figures are as follows:
Work in process 20,000
Finished goods 30,000
Cost of goods sold 50,000
How much shouldTiger’s over/underapplied manufacturing fixed overhead be adjusted to Finished Goods (FG) if the proportional allocation method is used?
a. $15,000 more (i.e. debit) to FG.
b. $15,000 less (i.e. credit) to FG.
c. $30,000 more (i.e. debit) to FG.
d. $30,000 less (i.e. credit) to FG.
Revisit the earlier Tiger, Ltd. exercise on slide 56. Before any manufacturing fixed overhead over/underapplied adjustment, the relevant figures are as follows:
Work in process 20,000
Finished goods 30,000
Cost of goods sold 50,000
How much shouldTiger’s over/underapplied manufacturing fixed overhead be adjusted to Finished Goods (FG) if the proportional allocation method is used?
a. $15,000 more (i.e. debit) to FG.
b. $15,000 less (i.e. credit) to FG.
c. $30,000 more (i.e. debit) to FG.
d. $30,000 less (i.e. credit) to FG.
Quick Check
Amount Percent of
Total
Underapplied
of $50,000 Work in process 20,000$ 20% 10,000$ Finished Goods 30,000 30% 15,000 Cost of Goods Sold 50,000 50% 25,000
Total 100,000$ 100% 50,000$
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 67
Revisit the earlier Tiger, Ltd. exercise on slide 55. Before any manufacturing fixed overhead over/underapplied adjustment, the relevant figures are as follows:
Work in process $20,000
Finished goods $30,000
Cost of goods sold $50,000
How much shouldTiger’s over/underapplied manufacturing fixed overhead be adjusted to Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) if the proportional allocation method is used?
a. $50,000 more (i.e. debit) to COGS.
b. $50,000 less (i.e. credit) to COGS.
c. $25,000 more (i.e. debit) to COGS.
d. $25,000 less (i.e. credit) to COGS.
Revisit the earlier Tiger, Ltd. exercise on slide 55. Before any manufacturing fixed overhead over/underapplied adjustment, the relevant figures are as follows:
Work in process $20,000
Finished goods $30,000
Cost of goods sold $50,000
How much shouldTiger’s over/underapplied manufacturing fixed overhead be adjusted to Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) if the proportional allocation method is used?
a. $50,000 more (i.e. debit) to COGS.
b. $50,000 less (i.e. credit) to COGS.
c. $25,000 more (i.e. debit) to COGS.
d. $25,000 less (i.e. credit) to COGS.
Quick Check
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 68
Revisit the earlier Tiger, Ltd. exercise on slide 56. Before any manufacturing fixed overhead over/underapplied adjustment, the relevant figures are as follows:
Work in process 20,000
Finished goods 30,000
Cost of goods sold 50,000
How much shouldTiger’s over/underapplied manufacturing fixed overhead be adjusted to Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) if the proportional allocation method is used?
a. $50,000 more (i.e. debit) to COGS.
b. $50,000 less (i.e. credit) to COGS.
c. $25,000 more (i.e. debit) to COGS.
d. $25,000 less (i.e. credit) to COGS.
Revisit the earlier Tiger, Ltd. exercise on slide 56. Before any manufacturing fixed overhead over/underapplied adjustment, the relevant figures are as follows:
Work in process 20,000
Finished goods 30,000
Cost of goods sold 50,000
How much shouldTiger’s over/underapplied manufacturing fixed overhead be adjusted to Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) if the proportional allocation method is used?
a. $50,000 more (i.e. debit) to COGS.
b. $50,000 less (i.e. credit) to COGS.
c. $25,000 more (i.e. debit) to COGS.
d. $25,000 less (i.e. credit) to COGS.
Quick Check
Amount Percent of
Total
Underapplied
of $50,000 Work in process 20,000$ 20% 10,000$ Finished Goods 30,000 30% 15,000 Cost of Goods Sold 50,000 50% 25,000
Total 100,000$ 100% 50,000$
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 69
Learning Objective 8
Explain the potential problems of using absorption costing.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 70
Creating Extra Profit Without Increase In Sales
Continue with the Harvey Fresh example (slides 54, and 58 to 64). Assume the company had the same sales, revenue and cost structure but produced 35,000 units (instead of 25,000 units) to increase ending inventory by 10,000 units.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 71
Overapplied adjustments required Harvey Fresh’s actual fixed manufacturing overhead
= $120,000 Based on the original scenario, the applied overhead
was based on actual production of 25,000 units at $6 each (slide 19), giving rise $150,000 being applied to the items produced. Therefore, it was overapplied by $30,000 ($150,000 applied - $120,000 actual).
Based on the new scenario, the applied overhead was based on actual production of 35,000 units at $6 each (slide 19), giving rise $210,000 being applied to the production. Therefore, it was overapplied by $90,000 ($210,000 applied - $120,000 actual).
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 72
Profit Arising from Ending Inventory Value
The additional profit ($60,000) is the same amount as the additional overapplied adjustment ($90,000 - $30,000).
The overapplied adjustment is to make good of the applied fixed overhead to match with the actual overhead spent.
The additional profit actually arises from the additional fixed overhead (based on the predetermined overhead rate, POHR) carried forward through the change in ending inventory, amounting the same as the over/underapplied fixed overhead adjustment if the adjustment is written off directly to cost of goods sold.
If the adjustment is done through the proportional method shown in slides 61– 64, then the increased profit will not match the overapplied adjustment.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 73
Value of Ending Inventory
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 74
Use of Variable CostingContinue with the Harvey Fresh example but presenting the results using the variable costing format.
Profits remain the same despite of changing quantity in production and ending inventory
Use of Variable Costing can avoid Profit inflation through producing more inventories
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 75
Overapplied and Underapplied Manufacturing Overhead - Summary
Alternative 1 Alternative 2If Manufacturing Close to Cost ProportionalOverhead is . . . of Goods Sold Allocation
UNDERAPPLIED INCREASE INCREASECost of Goods Sold Work in Process
(Applied OH is less Finished Goodsthan actual OH) Cost of Goods Sold
OVERAPPLIED DECREASE DECREASECost of Goods Sold Work in Process
(Applied OH is greater Finished Goodsthan actual OH) Cost of Goods Sold
Harvey Fresh’s Method
More accurate but more complex to compute.More accurate but more complex to compute.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 76
Quick Check
What effect will the overapplied overhead have on Harvey’s net operating income?
a. Net operating income will increase.b. Net operating income will be unaffected.c. Net operating income will decrease.
What effect will the overapplied overhead have on Harvey’s net operating income?
a. Net operating income will increase.b. Net operating income will be unaffected.c. Net operating income will decrease.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 77
Quick Check
What effect will the overapplied overhead have on Harvey’s net operating income?
a. Net operating income will increase.b. Net operating income will be unaffected.c. Net operating income will decrease.
What effect will the overapplied overhead have on Harvey’s net operating income?
a. Net operating income will increase.b. Net operating income will be unaffected.c. Net operating income will decrease.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 78
May be more complex May be more complex but . . .but . . .
May be more complex May be more complex but . . .but . . .
Multiple Predetermined Overhead Rates
To this point, we have assumed that there is a single To this point, we have assumed that there is a single predetermined overhead rate called a plantwide predetermined overhead rate called a plantwide
overhead rate.overhead rate.
To this point, we have assumed that there is a single To this point, we have assumed that there is a single predetermined overhead rate called a plantwide predetermined overhead rate called a plantwide
overhead rate.overhead rate.
Large companies Large companies often use multiple often use multiple
predetermined predetermined overhead rates.overhead rates.
Large companies Large companies often use multiple often use multiple
predetermined predetermined overhead rates.overhead rates.
May be more accurate because May be more accurate because it reflects differences across it reflects differences across
departments.departments.
May be more accurate because May be more accurate because it reflects differences across it reflects differences across
departments.departments.
Garrison, Noreen, Brewer, Cheng & YuenMcGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Slide 79
End of Chapter 5