Gap formation in Young Circumstellar Disks due to Photoevaporation from the Central star
description
Transcript of Gap formation in Young Circumstellar Disks due to Photoevaporation from the Central star
HBT 28-Jun-2005
Henry ThroopDepartment of Space Studies
Southwest Research Institute (SwRI)Boulder, Colorado
John BallyUniversity of Colorado
DPS Pasadena, October 2006
Gap formation in Young Circumstellar Disks due to Photoevaporation from
the Central star
HBT 28-Jun-2005
Photoevaporation from Central Star• Historically thought unimportant due to low UV flux from central
star and poor line-of-sight geometry.
• Hollenbach et al (1994) revived idea with indirect flux reflected off disk’s corona.
• Matsuyama et al (2003) found that PE would create gap, but only after disk is depleted by 10 Myr+ of viscous evolution.
• Alexander et al (2005, 2006) STIS measurements found photospheric UV flux from young solar-mass stars. Showed PE could make gaps, using direct illumination in flared disks.
• We add dust transport to latest PE model.
HBT 28-Jun-2005
Dust settles to midplane rapidly -- cm sizes in 105 yr
HBT 28-Jun-2005
Photoevaporation: UV flux heats gas to 1500K, heating and dissociating H2 and allowing it to leave disk via Jeans escape
ddt ~ R-5/2, for R > RG
ddt = 0, for R < RG
Gravitational radius RG ~ 2 AU
RG ~ 2 AU
RG RG
HBT 28-Jun-2005
• Photoevaporation creates gap outward of RG
• Gas is removed but dust is retained– Dust is at midplane and inaccessible to PE– Dust has grown large enough to be retained
RG RG
HBT 28-Jun-2005
Viscous evolution fills in gap with new dust, gas
RG RG
HBT 28-Jun-2005
Process continues: Gas is removed and dust is transported inward
RG RG
HBT 28-Jun-2005
Final state:Gas depleted in gapDust enhanced in gap
Dust:Gas ratio D/G increased to point that gravitational instability can rapidly form planetesimals (Skkiya 1997; Youdin & Shu 2002)
RG RG
HBT 28-Jun-2005
Disk Model• Disk
– MMSN disk surrounding solar-mass star– Flared disk– Viscous evolution, = 0.01 (e.g., Pringle 1981)
• Photoevaporation– Central star flux 1041 ionizing photons/sec– Alexander et al 2005; Hollenbach et al 1994.
• Dust Transport– Dust settles to midplane rapidly (< Myr)– Dust grains are radially transported viscously– Radial transport stops when gas is depleted– Dust:gas ratio 1:100
HBT 28-Jun-2005
QuickTime™ and aSorenson Video 3 decompressorare needed to see this picture.
HBT 28-Jun-2005
Photoevaporation Off
HBT 28-Jun-2005
Photoevaporation OnPhotoevaporation On
HBT 28-Jun-2005
Photoevaporation OnPhotoevaporation On
GI unstable region
HBT 28-Jun-2005
Conclusions and Implications• Gas disk in region ~2-10 AU is depleted on Myr
timescales– Faster than viscous timescales, but compatible with
observations of disk lifetimes– Gap formation will be slower for disks > 1 MMSN
• Dust, planetesimals concentrated at gap• Planetesimals can be formed via GI, if not formed
already• May speed formation of gas giant cores, but limits
envelope accretion timescales• In dense clusters (OB associations), effects of PE are
additive!– External star: Removes disk from outside in (Johnstone et al
1998; Throop & Bally 2005)– Central star: Removes disks from inside out
HBT 28-Jun-2005
HBT 28-Jun-2005
Planetesimal Formation• Two methods:
– Sticking– Gravitational Instability
HBT 28-Jun-2005
Photo-Evaporation Triggered Instability• Gravitational collapse of dust
in disk can occur if sufficiently low gas:dust ratio (Sekiya 1997; Youdin & Shu 2004)
g / d < 10 (I.e., reduction by 10x of
original gas mass)
• PE removes gas and leaves most dust– Grain growth and settling
promote this further
• Dust disk collapse provides a rapid path to planetesimal formation, without requiring particle sticking.
Throop & Bally 2005