GAD Organizational Assessment
description
Transcript of GAD Organizational Assessment
![Page 1: GAD Organizational Assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/55cf9213550346f57b933faf/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT
Factor Present Absent
ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS
Mandate and objectives
Are these gender-sensitive? Too generic; must be revisited Subject Organization to GMEF
Do these express commitment Yes, directly addresses the and further gender analysis
to improving human condition? intention of empowering with other experts
communities with improved
health seeking behaviors
Are these commited to Yes, but not deliberately
gender goals? comitted to gender goals
Sponsorship for GAD
Do key decision makers understand They are not fully aware of GAD GAD orientation
and support GAD goals? and intention behind it
Are there prime movers for GAD Yes, there are, however
in the agency? needs to broaden knowledge
Gender sensitivity of co-workers
Are co-workers sensitive? No, sexual harassment is present Gender-sensitivity
but not victim is not fully aware and consciousness
that it is a form of sexual
harassment
Do they accept GAD concepts and Yes, they are eager and
goals? awaiting for GAD activities
Do they see the relevance of GAD Yes, through informal
in their work? In their home life? conversations, there are
indicative signs of using gender
lens into personal and political
aspects
Gender responsiveness of
organization
Are decision-making processes Yes, partly they are participatory Subject organization to
gender sensitive? Gender audit and
Are employment policies (recruitment, No, some of them are gender- analysis
maintenance, and promotion) blind specifically our HR policies
gender-sensitive?
Are office procedures and practices Yes, but can be improved
gender-sensitive?
Is the database sex-disaggregated? Yes, but for regional indicators,
some of the data for
consolidation omits the SDD
Are there individuals in the None.
organization who are equipped
gender analysis and planning
skills?
PROGRAM FACTORS
Integration of GAD in routine work
What can be done to improve the situation
![Page 2: GAD Organizational Assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/55cf9213550346f57b933faf/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT
Are GAD messages and concepts Mostly are not including gender Revisit IEC materials for
integrated in the regular education, approaches in training and its gender sensitivity and
training, and service programs other service programs responsiveness
of the agency?
Are participatory processes used by Yes, we are gradually involving
the agency in the design, other external and internal
implementation and evaluation partners in the development
of programs? of programs
Gender fair messages
Is sexism present/absent in IEC There are some notable sexist Revisit IEC materials for
materials innuendos in the IEC its gender sensitivity and
responsiveness
Is gender stereotyping maintained Stereotyping is still present
or removed? especially in reproductive health
Are innovative and non-traditional Partyly yes
roles promoted by print and
other materials, and by services?
Recognition of multiple roles
Are practical and strategic needs Yes, but most of the programs Example of this is SHIs and Focus attention to key
addressed by the program? are only adressing practical pink health cards strategic needs
needs
Institutionalization of GAD
Is there an individual or group Yes, there will also be Involve GAD specialists and
responsible for mainstreaming a committee for this groups in the advocacy
gender? Is a budget maintained
GAD-related activities?
Is the agency in touch with Not yet.
other GAD practitioners
![Page 3: GAD Organizational Assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/55cf9213550346f57b933faf/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
GAD Activity Gender Issue/GAD mandate
Cause of the gender issue
Target for Year 1
Target for Year 2
Target for Year 3
![Page 4: GAD Organizational Assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/55cf9213550346f57b933faf/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Develop the Gender Mainstreaming Plan Develop a Capacity Development Map P/A/P should be left gender insensitive, gender unresponsive
designing appropriate intervention courses for GAD
GAD Planning OPIF as a main source of MFO
gender lens re-check and validate to the appropriateness of OPIF/MFOs to GAD performance indicators
Raising awareness ADVOCATES Incubation projects
should be different for GAD focal point from the employees using incubation projects as a way of mainstreaming programs for GAD
Develop CORE GAD messages for health and for clients
as "sexy" as possible Use Framework Plan for Women for client-focused (women's economic empowerment, women's human rights, gender responsive governance)
Always build monitoring Use GMEF for organization focused activities (level of gender mainstreaming)
Leasons learned sessions and document using Harmonized Gender Development Guide(HGDG)
and post the results
do a GAD locator - highest effective indicator - low cost; high value) Focus on these areasGAD BUDGET Utilization Towards Gender Responsive Governance bantay sa dagat
Transparency mechanisms Promotion of Women's Economic Empowerment
Crafting of internal check and control on the use of GAD budget Millennium Development Goals
BAI
Instead of activities think of the BIGGER impactBFI local health accounts walang stratehiya, kung walang makatarungang storyauni-directional approaches multi-tiered approaches walang GRB plano, kung walang kaparis na tamang konteksto