GAARNG Environmental Stewarship Newsletter
description
Transcript of GAARNG Environmental Stewarship Newsletter
The Georgia Department of Defense Environmental Stewardship Branch
exists to support Commanders and their Mission by reducing environmental
liabilities and promoting the US Army Environmental Stewardship Program.
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP BRANCH STAFF
Our Mission
Georgia Army National Guard
Environmental Stewardship
Branch Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 3
Dania Aponte Environmental Programs Director (678) 569-6707 [email protected]
Butch Thompson Sustainability Program Manager (912) 767-1823 [email protected]
Felicia Nichols NEPA Program Manager (678) 569-6755 [email protected]
Randy Drummond Restoration and Clean-up Manager (678) 569-6750 [email protected]
Rolandria Boyce eMS Program Manager (678) 569-6749 [email protected]
Karen Corsetti Pest Management Program Manager (678) 569-6701 [email protected]
Yvonne Edwards Environmental Technical Support Specialist (678) 569-6752 [email protected]
Kathryn Norton Cultural Resources Assistant (678) 569-6726 [email protected]
Michael Holloway Environmental Assessor (678) 569-3841 [email protected]
Tangy Johnson Environmental Assessor (912) 767-9133 [email protected]
Vacant Environmental Assessor Marietta
Vacant Environmental Assessor Macon
Vacant Environmental Assessor Tifton
"Let every individual and institution now think and act as a responsible trustee of Earth, seeking choices in ecology,
economics and ethics that will provide a sustainable future, eliminate pollution, poverty and violence, awaken the
wonder of life and foster peaceful progress in the human adventure."
— John McConnell
Our Vision
Commanders maintaining readiness while acquiring the knowledge and re-
sources to make informed decisions that protect and conserve today’s re-
sources for tomorrow’s National Guard Soldiers and Citizens of Georgia.
June 2011
~Clay National Guard Center- 1000 Halsey Avenue, Building 70, Marietta, GA 30060~
Environmental stewardship is the sus-
taining of environmental quality shared
by all those whose actions affect the en-
vironment.
In 2005, the USEPA laid out a vision for
environmental stewardship recognizing it
as a means to a more sustainable future.
The Environmental Stewardship Branch
strives to assess the impacts of
GAARNG activities comprehensively
and proactively.
The Environmental Quality Control Committee
Page 2
Environmental Stewardship Branch
The next Environmental Quality Control Committee (EQCC) is scheduled for June 21, 2011. This meet-
ing is particularly important since National Guard Bureau (NGB) has completed the final QA of the find-
ings assessed during the February external EPAS Assessment. Representatives from NGB will be visiting
Georgia in June to discuss next steps and provide some general Environmental Management System
(eMS) awareness training. We anticipate Senior Leadership, including the COS, CFMO and EQCC mem-
bers to be present. This meeting represents a positive step towards establishing a viable line of commu-
nication regarding environmental stewardship and sustainability.
Additionally, over the next few months the Environmental Stewardship Branch will be reviewing all find-
ings levied against the GAARNG and developing a corrective action plan for each deficiency.
A key element emphasized during the EPAS is that communication is key to the success of the program.
The CFMO’s dissemination of information through the representatives in the EQCC is directly linked to
the success of the GAARNG’s eMS. Ultimately, the eMS is the GAARNG’s mechanism to ensure that
conformance to regulatory compliance is achieved and maintained.
"You must be the
change you wish to
see in the world."
— Mahatma Gandhi
Page 3
Clean-up and Restoration
The Cleanup & Restoration Program continues to move forward with completion of Environmental
Condition of Property (ECOP) documents, Site Surveys, and Cleanup contracts that are managed
locally and from the centrally-funded Department of Defense Environmental Restoration Program
(DERP).
An updated ECOP was recently completed for the renewal of the license for the Warrior Training
Center, also known as Camp Butler, located at Ft Benning, GA. This is a facility used by National
Guardsmen and other services from across the country to prepare soldiers for their special warfare
training, such as Ranger, Pathfinder, and Airborne Schools.
Environmental-Cleanup has been working with CFMO Contracting through the bid process to re-
move the estimated 15,000 to 20,000 used tires that have been illegally dumped on the Lorenzo
Benn Youth Development Center Property. After breeding some of the largest mosquitoes in Ful-
ton County, many of which we met personally during site visits, we are close to awarding the con-
tract to remove the tires and prepare the area for the upcoming MILCON project there.
Camp Butler, Ft. Benning, GA Illegally dumped tires, Lorenzo Benn, GA
Page 4
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 is a Federal law that requires if Federal funds are spent on a
project, operation or activity, the impact of those actions must be assessed, documented and provisions made for pub-
lic involvement before project initiation. The impact of not completing NEPA analysis and documents, is loss of NGB
funding for proposed actions and potential litigation. The Georgia Army National Guard currently has three proposed
construction projects undergoing NEPA analysis.
Regional Readiness Center - Atlanta: The proposed action includes construction and operation of a Regional
Readiness Center and a Warehouse facility in Fulton County, Atlanta. The remaining, undeveloped portions of the site
would be used for dismounted training activities. The 112-acre site is located on the former Lorenzo Benn Youth De-
velopment Center approximately 8.5 miles west of Atlanta.
Regional Readiness Center - Macon: The proposed action includes construction and operation of a Regional
Readiness Center and a 6-acre Motorpool area. The 30-acre site is located on the former Regional Training Institute
(RTI) in Macon.
Maneuver Area Training and Equipment Site (MATES) – Ft. Stewart: The proposed action includes the con-
struction and operation of 18 new Vehicle Maintenance Work Bays which would be located on the current MATES site
on the Georgia Garrison Training Center (GGTC) on Ft. Stewart.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Environmental Management Systems (eMS)
GAARNG has consistently made progress towards the full implementation of an eMS in accordance with EO 13148.
This management system will provide a systematic framework to manage the entire organization’s environmental im-
pacts. The benefits of having an eMS are numerous and are essential to environmental sustainability. With sustainability
as the goal, this eMS will improve the integration of core business mission with environmental performance and reduce
our organization’s environmental footprint.
The GAARNG is implementing an International Standard of Organization (ISO) 14001 based eMS. Subscribing
to this standard will enable the GAARNG to:
identify and control the environmental impact of its activities, products or services
improve its environmental performance continually
implement a systematic approach to setting environmental objectives and targets, to achieving these and to demon-
strating that they have been achieved.
In order for an eMS to be successful it must be owned by everyone in the organization. Therefore training is important
and required. In June 2011, video awareness training will be made available via the Sportal. For your convenience, you
will be able to view the Two Part, 12 minute training video directly from your computer. The training will provide an
overview of the significance of an Environmental Management System and what your role is. Additionally, the eMS Co-
ordinator is developing a facility site visit schedule to provide more in-depth eMS awareness training for all GAARNG
personnel. Senior leadership is tentatively scheduled to receive Commander Level training in August 2011.
If you have any questions regarding the GAARNG eMS please contact Rolandria Boyce at (678) 569–6749 or
Page 5
Cultural Resources and Native American Involvement
The Georgia Army National Guard, Construction and Facilities Management Office, Environmental Programs held a
formal Native American Consultation on December 6-8, 2010 in Atlanta, Georgia. The fourteen federally recognized
tribal nations with cultural interest in Georgia were invited to participate. Both the Adjutant General of the Georgia
National Guards, MG William Nesbitt, and the Commanding General of the Georgia Army National Guard, MG Maria
Britt, were present for the government-to-government consultation. Ten tribal representatives, most of whom were
the Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPOs) for their nation, representing nine of the federally recognized tribes,
were present.
Since the December consultation, the GAARNG has developed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the
United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma – the agreement was officially signed and adopted April 5,
2011. Also, the GAARNG is in the process of developing MOUs with two other nations at this time – the Muscogee
(Creek) Nation of Oklahoma and the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas. The GAARNG continues to pursue consul-
tation with federally recognized tribes and adoption of the MOU through on-going communication and future formal
multi-state consultation.
It is anticipated that our next Native American Consultation will be a joint effort to be held in Oklahoma this coming
September. We anticipate that four or five other states will also be part of the consultation process and that a larger
group of Tribes will be present. Currently, staff is working with OK staff to ensure that all the details for the consulta-
tion are worked out and that the GAARNG projects’ information is updated and ready for the presentations to the
Tribes. Two staff members will attend the consultation and will interact with the Tribes on behalf of the CFMO and
the TAG. Stay tuned for updates on the outcome of the consultation.
Cultural Resources and Section 106/110 of the National Historic Preservation Act
NHPA)
Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preserva-
tion Action (NHPA), the GAARNG is in discussion with
the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) regarding
the scheduled MILCON Regional Readiness Center con-
struction project to take place at the former Macon Re-
gional Training Institute (RTI). Home to the former Geor-
gia Academy for the Blind – School for the Negro Blind
(GAB), the tract is considered eligible for the National Reg-
ister of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterions A, B, and
C of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). A
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) will be developed be-
tween the SHPO and GAARNG-CFMO-ENV to outline
avoidance, minimization and/or mitigation measures for
impacts to historic structures due to the undertaking.
Please note that cultural resources do not deter future
constructions; but rather, the process may take a bit longer
in order to properly complete all the necessary documen-
tation. The former GMI located , Macon, GA
Page 6
In accordance with AR 200-1, CFMO-ENV will provide
one 8 hour block of Environmental Officer (EO)/Unit
Environmental Compliance Officer (UECO) training for
personnel assigned EO/UECO responsibilities. Training
will be conducted at the Distant Learning Center (DCL)
Macon (former RTI) on 22JUN11 from 0800-1700.
Class size is limited to 20 personnel, to register send an
email to Mr. Charles "Butch" Thompson at
[email protected]. Ensure email contains
rank, full name, and unit/facility assigned to as EO/
UECO. EO/UECO training is offered once per calendar
quarter by CFMO-ENV and rotates between locations
at GGTC, Macon, and Clay NGC.
All units/facilities are required to have personnel as-
signed as EO/UECO to manage environmental issues/concerns at the unit/facility.
POC is Mr. Charles ―Butch‖ Thompson at
[email protected], phone (912) 767-1823.
Environmental Performance Assessment System (EPAS) Updates) Update
Environmental Compliance
Environmental Officer (EO)/Unit Environmental Officer (UECO) Training 22 June 2011
We recently completed our external EPAS assessment conducted by NGB on 19 February 2011. Overall
the assessment went very well and there were no unexpected, rather surprising, non-compliance environ-
mental findings discovered. Since the completion of the assessment CFMO-ENV has completed the installa-
tion review of the findings and is awaiting NGB to complete the quality assurance (QA) review so the find-
ings can be finalized and uploaded to our installation corrective action plan (ICAP) hosted on the Web Com-
pliance Assessment and Sustainment Systems (WEBCASS) for corrective action/closure of each. CFMO-
ENV would like to express our appreciation for the cooperation and professionalism displayed by all person-
nel involved with the assessment, especially those at the facilities assessed. Upon receipt of the finalized find-
ings, CFMO-ENV will coordinate with all MACOMs/units/facilities to expedite implementing corrective ac-
tions so the findings can be closed as quickly as possible.
CFMO-ENV’s goal is to maintain 100% environmental compliance while sustaining an environmental pro-
gram that provides 100% support to GAARNG’s mission requirements. Direct all questions regarding the
EPAS assessment to CFMO-ENV (Mr. Butch Thompson, (912) 767-1823, [email protected]).
Page 7
Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) Open Burning-
Ban Begins May 1, 2011 for 54 Georgia Counties
(NOTE – Open burning of any type is not authorized at any GAARNG facility at any time)
Georgia EPD acknowledges the severe storms that hit the state recently. EPD will be addressing the proper
management of debris in counties affected by those storms in a separate press release.
Beginning May 1st and ending September 30th, EPD’s Open Burning Ban will be enforced in 54 Georgia
counties. The Open Burning Ban prohibits citizens and businesses from burning yard and land-clearing debris.
This rule is in addition to the year-round state ban on the burning of household garbage.
The Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) is reminding citizens that these rules are in place for a
reason – and the reason is health.
Besides the obvious effects of smoke on the human body such as watery eyes, smoke from fires contains
chemicals and pollutants that negatively impact a person’s health. Burning yard waste releases nitrogen ox-
ides and particle pollution into the air. Both pollutants contribute to lung and heart disease. Particle pollution is made up of extremely small particles that can increase the risk of a heart attack. In the heat of summer,
nitrogen oxides combine with fumes from fuels, paints and vegetation to form ground-level ozone. Ground-
level ozone can cause inflammation to the lungs. Burning household garbage, which is banned year-round in
Georgia, releases even more dangerous pollution.
The Open Burning Ban that begins May 1st is not new. Beginning in 1996 with the 13-county metro Atlanta
area, it has gradually come to include 54 counties. With Georgia’s growth and development comes more
traffic, more industry, more land clearing and more building -- all con-
tribute to air pollution. Some actions, such as campfires and agricultural
activities are exempt.
The good news is that the most recent monitoring data shows that
Georgia is attaining all current air quality standards. ―We are working
hard to improve air quality in Georgia,‖ says James A. Capp, Georgia
EPD Air Branch Chief. ―This success is confirmation that the clean air
programs we have in place in Georgia, including the open burning ban,
are working.‖
The Clean Air Act requires U.S. EPA to periodically review the current
air quality standards to ensure that they are still protective of public
health. As a result of their review, air quality standards may be tightened
further in the future. The U.S. EPA has indicated their intent to lower
the air quality standard for ground level ozone later this year. There-
fore, rules such as the open burning ban are just as important as ever
for ensuring that Georgians have clean air to breathe.
Page 8
Open Burning Ban (Cont’d)
Counties included in the ban and the appropriate EPD District Office phone numbers follow:
· Metro Atlanta District Office: 404-362-2671 Carroll, Clayton, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette,
Fulton, Gwinnett, Heard, Henry, Rockdale, Spalding counties
· Northeast District Office (Athens): 706-369-6376 Banks, Barrow, Butts, Clarke, Hall, Jackson, Jas-
per,
Madison, Morgan, Newton, Oconee, Putnam, Walton counties
. Northeast District Office (Augusta): 706-792-7744 Columbia, Richmond counties
· West Central District Office: 478-751-6612 Bibb, Crawford, Houston, Jones, Lamar, Monroe, Peach,
Pike, Twiggs, Upson, Meriwether, Troup counties
· Mountain District Office: 770-387-4900 Bartow, Catoosa, Chattooga, Cherokee, Cobb, Dawson,
Floyd, Forsyth, Gordon, Haralson, Lumpkin, Paulding, Pickens, Polk, Walker counties
For more information about alternatives to burning such as composting and chipping, please contact Joe
Dunlop at the Department of Community Affairs at 404-679-4940 or email him at [email protected], or
contact Roy Edwards at Georgia’s Department of Natural Resource’s Sustainability Division at 404-657-
7449 or email him at [email protected].
Debris can also be hauled to a commercial processing/grinding/composting operation or to an inert or
construction and demolition landfill. For a list of landfills in your area, please call EPD’s Solid Waste
Management Program at 404-362-2692.
For more information on the open burning ban and exemptions to the rule, please contact the Air Protec-
tion Branch at 404-363-7000 or visit the newly updated burning rules webpage at:
http://www.georgiaair.org/airpermit/html/planningsupport/openburning/index.htm.
OSHA to Adopt GHS Classification and Labeling of Chemicals
opt GHS Classification and Labeling of Chemicals
This summer, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is expected to announce that US employers
must begin to adopt the United Nations (UN) Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for the classification and labeling of
hazardous chemicals. The promulgation of this regulation means that virtually every chemical label, Material Safety Data
Sheet (MSDS) (soon to be called ―Safety Data Sheet‖ (SDS)), and written hazard communication plan will have to be
revised to meet the new standard. Worker training must also be updated so that workers can recognize and under-
stand the symbols and pictograms on the new labels, as well as the new hazard statements and precautions on SDSs.
These dramatic changes will impact other OSHA standards that address, Flammable and Combustible Liquids, Process
Safety Management (PSM), Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (Hazwoper), Fire Prevention and
Protection, Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories, and many of the chemical-specific OSHA
Page 9
OSHA to Adopt GHS Classification and Labeling of Chemicals
opt GHS Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (Cont’d)
standards (e.g., Lead Standard). Both employers and employees will need to familiarize themselves with the GHS Stan-
dards by attending appropriate training that will enable them to comply with the new OSHA requirements.
The GHS for the Classification and Labeling of Chemicals is a worldwide initiative to
promote standard criteria for classifying chemicals according to their health, physical
and environmental hazards. It uses pictograms, hazard statements, and the signal
words ―Danger‖ and ―Warning‖ to communicate hazard information on product la-
bels and safety data sheets in a logical and comprehensive way. The primary goal of
the GHS is better protection of human health and the environment by providing
chemical users and handlers with enhanced and consistent information on chemical
hazards. The following is a brief description of the three ways in which information
will be communicated:
Pictogram(s): A symbol inside a diamond with a red border, denoting a particular chemical hazard class. The ef
fectiveness of hazard communication is enhanced when important information is conveyed in more than one way, such
as combining eye-catching symbols with clear label text. Pictograms are a simple method of conveying information and
drawing attention to other label information. GHS uses pictograms in combination with the two distinct signal words
to quickly and simply relay important hazard information to chemical users and handlers, e.g., acute toxicity/lethality,
skin irritation/corrosion, etc). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) anticipates that five of the GHS pictograms
will be the most commonly used on pesticide labels (e.g., skull and cross bones, exclamation mark, corrosion, flame, or
environment). The complete set of GHS pictograms can be viewed on the United Nations GHS Web site (GHS
(Rev.1) (2005) - UNECE).
Hazard statement(s): A phrase assigned to each hazard category that describes the nature of the hazard. The haz
ard statement may be based on the UN’s GHS standard or similar statements that would not conflict with the GHS
standards. For example, the hazard statements ―Harmful if swallowed‖, ―Highly flammable liquid and vapor‖ and
―Harmful to aquatic life‖ are based, in part, on current EPA requirements, and they are generally very similar.
Signal word(s): One word used to indicate the relative severity of hazards and alerts the reader to a potential haz-
ard on the label and safety data sheet. The GHS includes two signal words:
“Warning” — or less severe hazard categories and;
“Danger” — for more severe hazard categories.
Lower categories of classification and unclassified products would not require pictograms or signal words under GHS.
Currently, the EPA system includes a third signal word ―Caution‖ that is used in addition to ―Warning‖ and ―Danger‖.
The adoption of the GHS classification and labeling of chemicals or products will provide the following benefits:
Enhance the protection of human health and the environment: The consistent and widespread us of GHS
will enhance protection of human health and the environment by providing an internationally comprehensible system
for hazard communication. GHS will help ensure more consistency in the classification and labeling of all chemicals,
thereby improving and simplifying hazard communication . This improved communication system will alert the user to
the presence of a hazard and the need to minimize exposure and risk, resulting in safer transportation, handling and
use of chemicals.
Page 10
OSHA to Adopt GHS Classification and Labeling of
Chemicals (Cont’d)
Promote sound management of chemicals worldwide: The GHS will provide a harmonized basis for
the first step in the sound management of chemicals by indentifying hazards, and communicating them. This
will be particularly useful for countries with out well-developed regulatory systems.
Facilitate Trade: The GHS will reduce costly and time-consuming activities needed to comply with multi-
ple classification and labeling systems, thereby promoting more consistency in regulations while reducing non
-tariff barriers to trade.
In the classification of a chemical hazard, the GHS specifies certain elements that should appear together on
chemical labels. Similar to the current EPA pesticide labeling system, hazard statements, pictograms
(symbols), and signal words may be required on pesticide or chemical product labels depending on the toxic-
ity or hazards of the product, while precautionary statements, product identifiers, and supplier information
are required on all labels. As some elements will change, OSHA, as well as the EPAS recognizes that imple-
menting the GHS will requires extensive outreach, education and training to promote understanding of the
new labels.
Changes associated with adopting the GHS’s chemical classification and labeling systems will not affect sup-
plemental information (such as directions for use and additional hazard information), testing methods for
health and environmental hazards, data requirements, the scope of hazards covered, policies governing the
protection of Confidential Business Information (CBI), or risk management measures on labels used by the
EPAS, OSHA, DOT or DOD, as long as the information does not contradict or detract from the GHS label
information.
By turning down your central heating thermostat one degree,
fuel consumption is cut by as much as 10%.
One ton of carbon dioxide that is released in the air can be
prevented by replacing every 75 watt light bulbs with energy
efficient bulbs.
Environmental Facts– Did you know?