G2 Annex 2 Project Workbook 2012-04-2 Update

7/31/2019 G2 Annex 2 Project Workbook 2012-04-2 Update

1/60

Outcome Targets Indicator Plan

Project Name Resilient Intensified and Diversified A Resilient Intensified and Diversified A Resil

Date updated 30 Mar 2012

No. ACTOR and how they will CHANGE Outcome target(s) 2014 Outcome target(s) 2018 Outc

ASSU

CON

Taken from the OLM: Actor group and

the practice, knowledge, attitude or skills

change

Specific description(s) of who/ how many

exactly the project expects to change

(Practice and/or KAS) and by how much,

by the end of the Project. There can be

more than one Outcome Target per each

Outcome line (first column- actor +

expected final change)

Specific description(s) of who/ how many

exactly the project expects to change

(Practice and/or KAS) and by how much,

by the end of the Project. There can be

more than one Outcome Target per each

Outcome line (first column- actor +

expected final change)

Specif

exact

(Prac

by the

more

Outco

expec

1 Farmers relying on rice-based and

aquaculture-based production

systems use improved varieties (rice,

fish etc.) and technologies in

productive and diversified agriculture

and aquaculture systems

A total of 300 farmers have adopted

improved rice varieties; 50 farmers

have adopted improved technology

for rice-rabi cropping systems; 50farmers have adopted improved

brackish water aquaculture systems -

in project villages and nearby villages

A total of 100,000 farmers have

adopted improved rice varieties;

10,000 farmers have adopted

improved technology for rice-rabicropping systems; 5,000 farmers

have adopted improved brackish

water aquaculture systems - in

project villages and nearby villages

A tot

adop

30,00

improcropp

have

wate

proje

2 Households, with focus on women

adopt integrated farming systems

and new technologies in homestead

A total of 100 households adopt

integrated farming systems and new

technologies in homesteads - in


A total of5,000 households adopt




A tot

integ

tech

proje

3 Projects and organisations involved

in seed production/dissemination

4 projects/schemes and

organisations & private sector

involved in seedproduction/dissemination (e.g.

CSISA, FTF, GOs & NGOs) adopt

recommendations based on results

of our rice variety and fish

species/quality evaluation

8 projects/schemes and

organisations & private sector

involved in seedproduction/dissemination (e.g.

CSISA, FTF, GOs & NGOs, private

companies) adopt recommendations

based on results of our rice variety

and fish species/quality evaluation

10 pr

orga

involprod

CSISA

comp

base

and f

4 Extension workers and development

agencies (e.g. GOs, NGOs, private

sector, CSISA, STRASA, FTF) are

promoting new technologies, training

farmers, and taking ownership of the

technologies disseminated

New technologies promoted in

Bangladesh by BRRI, DAE, DOF, BFRI,

BRAC and other projects, and in India

by CIBA, CSSRI, DOF, DA, Tiger

Reserve Project, Sundarban Devt

Board, and other NGOs in both

countries


Bangladesh by BRRI, DAE, DOF, BFRI,

BRAC and other projects, and in India

by CIBA, CSSRI, DOF, DA, Tiger

Reserve Project, Sundarban Devt

Board, and other NGOs in both

countries

New

more

BRRI

and i

Tiger

Devt

COM

coun

The Outcome Target Indicators Plan (OTIP) contains specific description(s), for each Outcome Pathway (from OLM), of who/ how many exactly

measure. THe expected output in this OTIP is a list of indicators ONLY for the Outcome Targets that the Indicators and tools to measure them a


2/60

Project Workbook

Table of Contents

1 Title Page with Reviewers' Comments

Tab Name: PNX Title Page

2 Project Partners and Contact Information

Tab Name: PNX Contacts

3 Outcomes Logic Model

Tab Name: PNX OLM

For more information, visit:

4 Outcome Target Indicators PlanTab Name: PNX OTIP


5 Milestone Plan

Tab Name: PNX Milestone Plan


CPWF M&E Guide- Milestone Plan

The milestone plan focuses on the end-dates by which your activities need to be completed and outputs need to

be delivered. It contains the project start and end date, and other important milestones. Progress reporting is

directly made on the original milestones as defined in the milestone plan.

This file contains spreadsheets of information submitted to the CPWF by the project team, and spreadsheets that we have

developed to aid our review process. Please change the 'PNX' to identify your project, e.g. Ganges Project 3 would be G3

This page contains main project information and the contracting and inception reviewers' comments.

Please list all your project participants with their contact details. This information will be fed into the CPWFcontact database. Please ensure that you inform the CPWF about any changes in your team.

The OLM is a table that describes the project's theory of change (ToC), or how the project is expected to work. It

is a description of the projects activities, outputs, outcomes and impact and their inter-relationships. Each line

describes an Outcome Pathway, with a short narrative description. The last row in the model is a narrative

description of how the project predicts that the outcomes it achieves are likely to reinforce each other and

eventually contribute to longer-term impact.

CPWF M&E Guide- Outcome Indicators Plan

CPWF M&E Guide- OLMs

The Outcome Target Indicators Plan (OTIP) contains specific description(s), for each Outcome Pathway (from

OLM), of who/ how many exactly the project expects to change (Practice and/or KAS) and by how much, by the

end of the Project. Indicators and tools to measure them are included for each outcome target.

CPWF Project Workbook Table of Contents Page 2
https://sites.google.com/a/cpwf.info/m-e-guide/indicator-and-milestone-planhttps://sites.google.com/a/cpwf.info/m-e-guide/indicator-and-milestone-planhttps://sites.google.com/a/cpwf.info/m-e-guide/outcome-pathways-and-outcome-logic-modelhttps://sites.google.com/a/cpwf.info/m-e-guide/outcome-pathways-and-outcome-logic-modelhttps://sites.google.com/a/cpwf.info/m-e-guide/indicator-and-milestone-planhttps://sites.google.com/a/cpwf.info/m-e-guide/indicator-and-milestone-plan


3/60

6 Gantt Chart

Tab Name: PNX Gantt Chart


7 Schedule of Reports and Payments = filled by CPWF Finance Officer for contracting

Tab Name: PNX $ Schedule

8 Budget Summary

Tab Name: PNX $ Summary

9 Budget Comments

Tab Name: PNX $ Comments

10 Staff Time Allocation and Breakdown of Personnel Costs

Tab Name: PNX $ Time Allocation

11 Indicative Breakdown of Budget by Outputs

Tab Name: PNX $ By Outputs

12 Indicative Breakdown of Budget by Institution

Tab Name: PNX $ By Institution

This table shows the distribution of budget by output then by institution. The overhead costs are not included in

the distribution.

This table shows a summary of the budget allocated to the project partner institutions (left part). The right part

of the table could be of support to work out each project partners budget share by line item.

This spreadsheet shows the breakdown of the project budget per line item and per year.

The comments worksheet is where budget explanations and details are explained.

In this worksheet the project team compositon is listed with their names, institution, expertise and contribution

to the project (e.g., Output 1, Communication, Policy, etc.), the number of days per year, and the daily rate per

staff.

The Gantt Chart focuses on the activities to be carried out to complete the project. This chart contains the

project schedule, work breakdown structure, i.e. activities with their milestones as the terminal elements, their

start and finish dates, responsible project team member and their affiliations.

CPWF M&E Guide- Gantt Chart

This spreadsheet will be filled out by CPWF finance officer for contracting according to the budget details the

project has submitted. It shows the schedule of budget release, which depends on the satisfactory submission

and approval of the required progress reports.

CPWF Project Workbook Table of Contents Page 3
https://sites.google.com/a/cpwf.info/m-e-guide/gantt-charthttps://sites.google.com/a/cpwf.info/m-e-guide/gantt-chart


4/60

Title Page with Reviewers' Comments

Project Leader

Project Number

Project Short Title

Reporting Period

Starting Date

Completion Date

Review Questions (RQ) Reviewer Remarks on status (inlcude

date)

Changes required to proceed

to contracting

Response from the Project

Leader (include date)

Status of chan

after resubmis

filled in by the

RQ1: Are documents in order,

provide information required,

and is there consistency

between them?

Cells highlighted in yellow must be

dealt with for contracting

Documents according to Standard

Clauses and Procedures 3.02 and

3.03 (see list below)

Cells highlighted in orange must be

dealt with by time of inception

report

Revised proposal First submission 2011.03.03

Contact sheet First submission 2011.03.03 please submit CVs of the other

partners (WFC)

please add the names of the

partners who are still to be

hired as well as the consultants

04 April 2011

Additional CVs are now

submitted with the revised

Proposal. Position of PDF,

consultant, Graduate students

are to be determined and are

added

Gantt chart First submission 2011.03.03

Milestone plan First submission 2011.03.03

OLM First submission 2011.03.03

OTIP not submitted

KM Point

Person

To Phuc Tuong

Productive, profitable, and resilient agriculture and aquaculture systems

G2

April 30, 2011

April 30, 2014

CPWF Project Workbook Title Page with Reviewers' Comments


5/60


date)


to contracting



Status of chang

after resubmiss

filled in by the r

Budget First submission 2011.03.03 Proposed budget exceeds the

amount in the EOI by $45,947

Suggested changes were made

to the spreadsheets (in red ink)

to show consistency of

information across the

spreadsheets in the workbook

Please indicate the baseline for

the Daily Charge Out $ (it is

understood that the

succeeding year's personnel

budget includes the 3% and 5%

annual increment)

04 April 2011

The proposed budget is now

adjusted. The

changes are in red and blue

Daily charge Out $ is now

added, with note of increasing

3% for IRS and 5% for NRS

Plan for baselining of outcome

targets

Signed MOUs corresponding to

milestone plan

Third party intellectual audit



6/60


date)


to contracting



Status of chang

after resubmiss

filled in by the

RQ2: Have there been changes

in budget share going to

partners, and if so, are they

consistent with the changes in

responsibilities?

Program

Manager

RQ3: Does the budget appear

consistent with the promised

outputs?

Program

Manager

RQ4: Looking at the people

responsible for producing the

outputs, do these teams

contain people with the

requisite skill and is team size

appropriate?

MT Point

Person

RQ5: Is there a clear

assignment of responsibility

for producing outputs and

milestones to both individuals

and organizations?

MT Point

Person

RQ6: Have reviewers'

comments been addressed?

MT Point

Person



7/60


date)


to contracting

Response from the Projec


From Standard Clauses and Procedures

3.02 The documents required for contract signature are:

Revised project proposal that has addressed reviewers comments in particular negotiation points and incorpora

from workshops and other consultation processes.

Revised budget reflecting changes in project proposal

Gantt Chart

Milestone plan developed for at least the first year of operations

Draft Outcome Logic Model

Any other documentation agreed to between the Project Leader and the CPWF

3.03 The following documents are to be provided in electronic form to CPWF Basin Leader with the Inception Repo

Outcome Logic Model agreed with partners

Milestone plan developed for the duration of the project

Outcome target indicators plan

Plan for base lining of outcome targets

Signed MOUs corresponding to milestone plan

Third Party Intellectual Asset Audit

Any other documentation agreed to between the Project Leader and the CPWF.



8/60

Project Partners and Contact Details

Please remember to provide a CV for each person listed below as Annex B to your proposal. Indicate in particular who has responsibility for communications, M&E, know

Given Name Family Name Institution Role in the

project

Professional

discipline

Email Alternate Email Work Phone

To Phuc Tuong International Rice

Research Institute

Consultant Water science [email protected] [email protected]

om

n/a

Elizabeth Humphreys International Rice

Research Institute

Project Leader (after

Aug 2011); Principal

Investigator (Int'l)

Senior Scientist e.humphreys@cgiar.

org

63 2 5805600

Adelbagi Ismail International Rice

Research Institute

Principal Investigator

(Int'l)

Senior Scientist abdelbagi.ismail@cgi

ar.org

63 2 5805600

Glenn Gregorio International Rice

Research Institute

Other Project

Participant

Senior Scientist [email protected]

g

63 2 5805600

Manoranjan Mondal IRRI Co-ordinator for IRRI

in BGD

Collaborative

Research Scientist

manoranjan_km@ya

hoo.com

manoranjan.km@br

ac.net

880 2 9886608

Mohammed Rafiqul Islam International Rice

Research Institute

Other Project

Participant

Post doc [email protected]

g

63 2 5805600

Tao Li International Rice

Research Institute

Other Project

Participant

Scientist-Crop

modeller

[email protected] 63 2 5805600

Michael John Phillips The WorldFish

Center

Project Lead

Scientist for WFC

Senior Scientist [email protected] 60 46202160

Benoy Kumar Barman The WorldFish

Center


(Reg'l)

Field Coordinator/

Researcher

b.barman@cgxchan

ge.org

880 2 8813250

William J Collis The WorldFish

Center


(Int'l)

Director-Bangladesh

and South

Asia/Aquaculture

Specialist

[email protected] 880 2 8813251

Manjurul Karim The WorldFish

Center


(Int'l)

Scientist/Project

Coordinator

m.karim@cgxchange

.org

880-2 8813250

Kazi Ahmed Kabir The WorldFish

Center

Technical

Specialist

Research Assistant [email protected]

om

n/a

TBA Consultant to the

WorldFish Center

Consultant Data Management

Assistant

CPWF Project Workbook Project Partners and Contact Details
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]


9/60

Given Name Family Name Institution Role in the

project

Professional

discipline

Email Alternate Email Work Phone

Jitendra Kumar Sundaray Central Institute of

Brackishwater

Aquaculture


(Nat'l)

Principal Scientist-

Aquaculture

[email protected]

m

91-3210-255072

Shyamalendu Bikash Saha Bangladesh Fisheries

Research Institute

Principal

Investigator

(National)

ChiefScientific

Officer (cc)

[email protected]

m

M. Akhlasur Rahman Bangladesh Rice

Research Institute


(Nat'l)

Senior Scientific

Officer-Plant

Breeding

[email protected]

m

880-2-9257401-5

Sanjida Ritu Bangladesh Rice

Research Institute


(Nat'l)

Senior Scientific

Officer, Irrigation

Water Management

[email protected]

m

880 2 9252429

Khairul Bashar BRRI Coordinator Director Research mkbashar.brri@gma

il.com

mkbashar.brri@yah

oo.com

880 2 9252429

Abdur Rashid BRRI Principal Investigator

(Nat'l)

Head, Irrigation and

water management

arashidiwm@yahoo.

com

880 2 9263669

Sirajul Islam BRAC Principal Investigator

(Nat'l)

Program Head,

Agriculture and Food

Security

[email protected] [email protected] 880 2 9881265

91-3210-25507ashutoshddeo@g

mail.com

Ashutosh D. Deo Central Institute

of Brackishwater

Aquaculture

Associate

Investigator (Nat'l)

Senior Scientist-

Aquaculture

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]


10/60

Expertise Responsible for

Soil and water

management

consultant - water

mgt, cropping

systems,

governance, linking

with G1Soil and water

management

overall in-charge;

responsible for

communication,

M&ECrop physiology in-charge of

germplasm

validation and seed

distribution network

Crop physiology germplasm

validation and seed


Water Management resource

management for rice

based cropping

systems

Ban ladeshCrop physiology germplasm

validation and seed


Crop and production

system modeling

in-charge of

modeling

Aquaculture in charge of WFC-led

and -partnered

activitiesAquaculture coordinator of

aquaculture

activities; M&EAquaculture Aquaculture

specialist/Overall

management of

activities/GOB

liaison/Donor

communication etc

Integrated

Agriculture-

Aquaculture

oversight

aquaculture

activities;

communication

Aquaculture co-ordinator of fieldactivities in all 3

polders; monitoring;

writing drafts



11/60

Expertise Responsible for

Aquaculture aquaculture systems

(India)

Brackish water aquac Saline aquaculture

(polder 3); HH

survey (polder 30)

Plant Breeding germplasm

validation and seed


(Bangladesh)

Water Management Water management

and intensification of

rice-based cropping

systems

Plant Breeder Genetic resources

conservation and

seed technologyWater management Water management

in rice based

cropping systems

Agronomist Adaptive research

on rice based

cropping systems

Ban ladesh

Aquaculture aquaculture

systems (India)



12/60

Outcomes Logic Model

Project Name Productive, profitable, and resilient agriculture and aquaculture systems

Date

Actor(s) Desired change in actor(s)

practice

Required change in actor KAS

for change to happen

Project strategies and

prototypes for bringing about

changes

Outcome

Pathway 1

Farmers relying on rice-based

and aquaculture-based

production systems

Use improved varieties (rice,


productive and diversified

agriculture and aquaculture

systems

Awareness of benefits of new

varieties, cultural practices,

and cropping systems suitable

to the resource profile of their

land. Willing to invest more in

relevant inputs and changes in

practices

Develop, demonstrate, and

participatory evaluate new

cropping systems with

improved varieties in different

target zones (with different

land and water characteristics)

Narrative

2011-02-26; revised 2011-04-04; revised 2011-10-30

Land and water productivity in the fresh-/brackish-water environments in the coastal zones in India and Bangladesh is low. The m

fishermen cultivate only one crop per year (e.g., rice in wet season or shrimp in dry season). One reason is the lack of suitable vari

yield, stress-tolerant) and technologies to diversify and increase their cropping intensities. Through participatory evaluation and s

experiments (on-station and on-farm), the project will develop crop intensification/diversification technologies appropriate to diff

from low to high salinity) available to farmers.

CPWF Project Workbook Outcomes Logic Model Page 12 of 60


13/60


Date


practice





changes

2011-02-26; revised 2011-04-04; revised 2011-10-30

Outcome

Pathway 2

Households, withfocus on

women

Adapt integrated farming

systems and new technologies

in homestead

Awareness of the value of

improved homestead

technologies and production

systems in enhancing

livelihood and nutrition;

improve their skill in applying

suitable technologies

Production systems research,

participatory demonstration

and evaluation of homestead

technologies, production

systems with suitable

aquaculture species and

varieties; model systems

designed based on available

resources

Narrative

Outcome

Pathway 3

Crop and aquaculture seed

producers (GOs, NGOs, private)and seed suppliers

Provision of high-quality seeds

of improved rice varieties andaqaculture species

Knowledge of value and

benefits of high-quality seedsof improved varieties and

aquaculture species.

Participate in seed production

systems

Provide quality seeds of

improved rice varieties.Communication to improve

awareness and knowledge on

seeds of new rice varieties and

suitable aquaculture species

appropriate to target groups

Narrative

Narrative: The homestead often occupies a small proportion of farmers' land, yet it can contribute a great deal to improving liveli

households, especially for children and women. Homestead activities also offer job opportunities (often unreported and unaccou

will develop/test available integrative farming systems of crop productionanimal husbandryaquaculture that households, espe

improve homestead productivity and enhance the nutritional value of homestead products. Households will participate in testing

training will be carried out to improve farmers' awareness of the benefits of the available technologies.

Narrative: One of the main constraints for farmers' adaptation of new technologies is the lack of seeds of suitable varieties. The p

breeder seeds of improved varieties to selected public and private seed producers and encourage them to participate in the seed

network to ensure an adequate supply of seeds of suitable varieties to farmers.



14/60


Date


practice





changes

2011-02-26; revised 2011-04-04; revised 2011-10-30

Outcome

Pathway 4

Extension workers and

development agencies (GOs,

NGOs, private sector, CSISA)

Promoting new technologies,

training farmers, and taking

ownership of the technologies

disseminated

Awareness of the benefits and

profitability of new varieties,

suitable aquatic species, and

production systems. Train and

disseminate new technologies

to farmers and aquaculturists

Collaboration in the conduct of

field trials and development

and dissemination of extension

materials and knowledge;

Invite potential partners to

participatory evaluation of

technologies and to visit

demonstration trials.

Narrative

Outcome

Pathway 5

Microfinance agencies

(includes NGOs, banks who

provide agricultural finance -

RCD, Rural Credit Department)

Provide microfinance for inputs

of new technologies; Increase

loans to farmers who apply

new technologies

Awareness that new

technologies may need higher

input but will increase farmers'

profits and may shorten the

return period.

Communicate the financial

benefits of new varieties (crops

and fisheries) and

technologies. Invite potential

partners to participatory

evaluation of technologies and

to visit demonstration trials.

Narrative

The uptake of technologies often occurs after the end of the project. This can be ensured only if the extension workers at differen

zones are aware of and take ownership of the technologies and build their own program to disseminate the technologies. The pro

workers to join the participatory testing and evaluation of new germplasm and technologies. They will take part in producing exte

farmers.

Farmers and households in coastal areas normally do not have adequate financial resources to buy new seeds (or aquaculture sto

new and intensive cropping systems. Finance agencies (GOs, NGOs) will be invited to participate in the evaluation of new technol

financial analyses of new technologies will be carried out to convincingly show that farmers who use new, improved varieties, tec

systems will have higher profit and be likely to pay back loans in a shorter time. Financers will therefore increase loans to farmers

in fields and in homestead activities.



15/60


Date


practice





changes

2011-02-26; revised 2011-04-04; revised 2011-10-30

Outcome

Pathway 6

Local and state governments

and ministries of agriculture

and fisheries in Bangladesh and

India

Provide enabling directives and

policies for seed production

and adoption of new

technologies

Knowledge of value and

benefits of high-quality seeds

of improved varieties and

suitable aquaculture species,

technologies, and cropping

systems. Understand the

importance of enabling policies

Timely inform governments of

different research findings.

Organize policy dialogues with

state governments and

relevant ministries, and

conferences. Invite

government officials to

experimental sites,

demonstrations, and site visits.

Produce policy briefs

Narrative

Outcome

Pathway 7

Researchers, research for

development Programs (e.g.

CSISA, IFAD), especially those

dealing with cropping and

brackish water aquaculture

systems

Develop, evaluate, and adapt

new cropping and improved

aquaculture systems with

appropriate varieties and

aquatic species

New knowledge and skills Collaborative research;

communication of research

strategies and findings via

publications and in national

and international

fora/conferences

Narrative Study sites of the project cover only a small portion of the coastal zones in the Ganges, and an even smaller portion of the world f

lands. Efforts similar to those in the project have to be performed over other coastal areas. Through publications and communica

the project will inform the scientific community of the research strategies, methodologies, and findings. Other researchers will be

in designing new cropping systems using appropriate varieties to increase the productivity of land and water, especially in the coa

Narrative: Large-scale adaptation of new technologies can occur only with appropriate policies on infrastructure investment, land

financing, investment in extension, and enforcement of recommendations, besides others. Together with Project G5, this project

with decision-makers at the local level and policymakers at the ministerial level to timely inform them of the research findings, an

enabling policies. We will produce policy briefs for a wider audience. We hope the outcome will be the recognition of the import

strengthen the adaptation of new varieties, new technologies, and cropping systems in fields and in homesteads.



16/60

Project outputs

G2.1: New rice varieties and

suitable aquaculture speciesvalidated, and seed production

of new rice varieties initiated

locally

G2.2: More productive,

profitable, resilient, and

diversified rice-based cropping

systems;

G2.4: Brackish-water aquatic

production systems

ajority of farmers and

eties (short-duration, high-

lection of varieties, and

erent target zones (ranging



17/60

Project outputs

G2.3: Improved homestead

production systems

G2.1: New rice varieties and

suitable aquaculture speciesvalidated, and seed production

of new rice varieties initiated

locally

G2.2: More productive,

profitable, resilient, and

ood, income, and nutrition of

ted for) to women. The project

ially women, can use to

the new technologies and

roject partners will provide

multiplication and distribution



18/60

Project outputs

G2.5: Technology and policy

recommendations


recommendations

t levels and especially in coastal

ject will invite extension

nsion materials and training

cking) and other inputs for the

gies. Careful economic and

nologies, and cropping

who practice new technologies



19/60

Project outputs


recommendations (together

with Project G5)

Publications on scientific

knowledge and process

understanding of all outputs

resh-/brackish-water coastal

tion at international forums,

able to use the new knowledge

stal zones.

use, input linearization and

ill organize frequent meetings

d to discuss with them possible

ance of suitable policies to



20/60

Outcome Targets Indicator Plan

Project Name Resilient Intensified and Diversified Agriculture and

Date updated 30 Mar 2012

No. ACTOR and how they will CHANGE Outcome target(s) 2014 Indicator(s)

Outcome Ta

Taken from the OLM: Actor group and

the practice, knowledge, attitude or

skills change

Specific description(s) of who/ how

many exactly the project expects to

change (Practice and/or KAS) and by

how much, by the end of the Project.

There can be more than one Outcome

Target per each Outcome line (first

column- actor + expected final change)

What you will

know you are

Outcome Targ

milestones)?

1 Farmers relying on rice-based and

aquaculture-based production

systems use improved varieties (rice,


productive and diversified agricultureand aquaculture systems

A total of 300 farmers have adopted

improved rice varieties; 50 farmers

have adopted improved technology

for rice-rabi cropping systems; 50

farmers have adopted improved

brackish water aquaculture systems -in project villages and nearby villages

Number of a

2 Households, with focus on women

adopt integrated farming systems and

new technologies in homestead

A total of 100 households adopt




Number of a

3 Projects and organisations involved in

seed production/dissemination

4 projects and organisations involved

in seed production/dissemination

(e.g. CSISA, FTF, GOs & NGOs) adopt

recommendations based on results of

our rice variety and fish

species/quality evaluation

Recommend

incorporated

multiplicatio

and/or disse

projects/orga

4 Extension workers and development

agencies (e.g. GOs, NGOs, private

sector, CSISA) are promoting new

technologies, training farmers, and

taking ownership of the technologies

disseminated


Bangladesh by BRRI, DAE, BFRI, BRAC,

CSISA, and in India by CIBA, CSSRI,

DOF, DA, Sundarban Devt Board

Number of d

promoting n

The Outcome Target Indicators Plan (OTIP) contains specific description(s), for each Outcome Pathway (fro

(Practice and/or KAS) and by how much, by the end of the Project. roject is committing to measure. THe ex

Outcome Targets that the Indicators and tools to measure them are included for each outcome target.

CPWF Project Workbook Outcome Targets Indicator Plan


21/60

Milestone Plan

Project Name

Date

No. Milestones = your progress markers Deadline ResponsiblePartner Institution

Responsible StaffProject Member

Outputs requiredby other projects

Means of veri

0

0.a Sites selected, research team at each site identified and

engaged

2011/04/15 IRRI and all

partners

TPT and PIs G1 LOA with Partn

reported in inc

0.b Workplan reported and approved in inception workshop 2011/05/15 IRRI and allpartners

TPT and PIs No Project workpdetailed workp

0.c Project progress reported and annual workplan approved in the

annual BDC reflection workshops

2011-12-15

2012-12-15

2013-12-15

IRRI and all

partners

EH and PIS G5 Progress repor

0.d Project completion report and publications 2014/04/30 IRRI and allpartners

EH and PIs G5 Completion re

0.e Baseline information - review of secondary data, situation

appraisals, village and key informant interviews (DAE, BRRI

"extensionists", BRAC, DOF, BFRI "extensionists"); survey on

southern part of polder 3 - NB household survey is a separate

activity below


partners

EH and PIS G1 , G3 Report

0.f Adoption surveys in project villages and nearby villages, key

informant interviews


partners

EH and PIS No Report

1

1.a Seeds of new varieties and breeding lines exchanged through

IRRI (IRRI)

2011-06-30

2012-06-30

2013-06-30

IRRI, BRRI, CSSRI GG (MRI, AR, BKB) No Seed received

reports

1.b Seeds for wet and dry seasons (BGD, IND) and early monsoon

season (BGD) multiplied and distributed to network partners

2012-03-31

2013-03-31

BRRI, CSSRI AR, BKB No Seeds distribut

evaluation

New germplasm validated and seed distribution network established


February 26, 2011

To be filled by PLs and Project Teams

Project well monitored and Implemented

CPWF Project Workbook Milestone Plan


22/60

Project Name

Date

No. Milestones = your progress markers Deadline Responsible

Partner Institution

Responsible Staff

Project Member

Outputs required

by other projects

Means of ver


February 26, 2011


1.c Salt and submergence tolerant wet season varieties evaluated

on-station and on-farm (BGD, IND)

2011-12-31

2012-12-31

2013-12-31

BRRI, CSSRI, BRAC BKB, AR No Field visits and

1.d Salt tolerant dry season varieties evaluated on station and on-

farm (BGD, IND)

2012-06-30

2013-06-30

BRRI BKB, AR No Field visits and

1.e Early monsoon season varieties evaluated on station and on-

farm (BGD)

2012-09-30

2013-09-30

BRRI, CSSRI, BRAC AR No Field visits and

1.f Farmers field days for PVS evaluation accomplished (BGD,IND)

2011-12-312012-04-30

2012-07-31

2012-12-31

2013-04-30

2013-07-31

2013-12-31

BRRI, CSSRI, BRAC BKB, AR G3, G5 Reports, farmfeedback repo

1.g Results of evaluation documented in project progress report

(BGD, IND)

2011-12-15

2012-06-30

2012-12-15

2013-06-30

2013-12-15

BRRI, CSSRI GG (MRI, AR, BKB) No Progress repo

1.h Synthesizing reports and publications 2014/04/30 IRRI, BRRI, BRAC,

CSSRI

AI (GG, MRI, AR,

BKB)

No Reports and p

2

2.a Experiment protocols (annually) 2011-04-15

2012-03-31

2013-03-31

IRRI, BRRI, BRAC,

CSSRI, WFC, CIBA,

BFRI

EH, TPT, MM, SR,

AR, BKB

No Protocols of e

target zones

2.b Experiment results and participatory evaluation documented in

6 month and annual project progress report (BGD, IND)

2011-12-15

2012-06-30

2012-12-15

2013-16-30

2013-12-15

IRRI, BRRI, BRAC,

CSSRI, WFC, CIBA,

BFRI

EH, TPT, MM, SR,

BKB

No Progress Repo

perception fee

2.c Draft and final versions of cropping system technical package -

systems, germplasm, management tailored to different sitesituations

2014/04/30 IRRI, BRRI, BRAC,

CSSRI, WFC, CIBA,BFRI

EH, TPT, MM, SR,

AR, BKB, AI, GG,MRI

No Reports and p

3

3.a Literature review and knowledge gaps identified 2012/03/31 WFC, BFRI,CSSRI,

CIBA

MK, MP, JA, BB,

JKS, BKB, SBS

No Literature rev

Improved homestead production systems

More productive, profitable, resilient & diversified rice-based cropping systems



23/60

Project Name

Date

No. Milestones = your progress markers Deadline Responsible

Partner Institution

Responsible Staff

Project Member

Outputs required

by other projects

Means of ver


February 26, 2011


3.b Report of survey findings, strategies for improving homestead

identified

2012/03/31 IRRI, WFC,

BFRI,CSSRI, CIBA

MK, MP, JA, BB,

JKS, BKB, SBS

No Survey report

3.c Experiment/study protocol (revised annually) 2012-03-31

2013-03-31

IRRI, WFC,

BFRI,CSSRI, CIBA

MK, MP, JA, BB,

JKS, BKB, SBS, EH

No Protocols of e

target zones

3.d Experiment results and participatory evaluation documented in


2011-12-15

2012-06-30

2012-12-15

2013-06-302013-12-15

IRRI, WFC,

BFRI,CSSRI, CIBA

MK, MP, JA, BB,

JKS, BKB, SBS

No Progress Repo

perception fee

3.e Draft and final versions of homestead farming systems

technical package

2014/04/30 IRRI, WFC,

BFRI,CSSRI, CIBA

MK, MP, JA, BB,

JKS, BKB, SBS, EH

No Reports and p

4

4.a Literature review and Experiment protocols (annually) 2011-11-30

(protocols)

2012-02-15

(review)

WFC, BFRI, CIBA MK, MP, JA, JKS,

SBS

No Protocols of e

water zone in

4.b Experiment results and participatory evaluation documented in


2012-06-30

2012-12-15

2013-06-30

2013-12-15

WFC, BFRI, CIBA MK, MP, JA, JKS,

SBS

No Progress Repo

perception fee

4.c Draft and final versions of brackish aquaculture system

technical package - systems, species/varieties, management

2014/04/30 WFC, BFRI, CIBA MK,MP, JA, JKS,

SBS

No Reports and p

5

5.a Training materials and reports produced 2012-06-30

2012-12-31

2013-06-30

IRRI, WFC, BRRI,

BFRI, CSSRI, CIBA

AI, EH, MP G3 Training mate

courses

5.b Extension materials produced 2012-12-31

2013-12-31

IRRI, WFC, BRRI,

BFRI, CSSRI, CIBA

AI, EH, MP G3 Leaflets, proc

5.c Policy dialogues organized 2012-12-31

2013-12-31

IRRI, WFC, BRRI,

BFRI, CSSRI, CIBA

AI, EH, MP G5 Policy briefs,

Brackish water aquatic production systems

Technology and policy recommendations for up- and out-scaling



24/60

Gantt Chart

Project Name

Date

No.

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

0 Project well monitored and Implemented

Activities 0.1 Formation of research team, selection sites

0.2 (i) Launch and (ii) Inception workshops i ii

0.3 project implementation, monitoring and reporting

0.4 Annual BDC meeting & annual G2 review & planning meeting

0.5 Project conclusion

Milestones 0.a Sites selected, research team at each site identified and engaged 0.a

0.b Workplan reported and approved in inception workshop 0.b 0.b

0.c Project progress reported and annual workplan approved in the annual BDC

reflection workshops

0.c 0.c

0.d Project completion report and publications


February 26, 2011

2011 2012

PWF Project Workbook Gantt Chart


25/60

Project Name

Date

No.

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1


February 26, 2011

2011 2012

1 New germplasm validated and seed distribution network established

Activities 1.1 Exchange of seeds with partners through IRRI (BGD, IND)

1.2 On-station and on-farm seed multiplication for the wet (aman) and dry

(boro) seasons (BGD, IND), and early monsoon (aus) season (BGD)

1.3 On-farm and on-station evaluation of salt and submergence tolerant wet

season varieties (BGD, IND)

1.4 On-station and on-farm evaluation of salt tolerant dry season varieties

(BGD, IND)

1.5 On station and on-farm evaluation of early monsoon varieties (BGD)

1.6 Farmers field days for PVS evaluation (BGD, IND)

1.7 Results of evaluation documented in project progress report (BGD, IND)

1.8 Synthesizing findings of Activities under output 1

Milestones 1.a Seeds of new varieties and breeding lines exchanged through IRRI (IRRI)1.a 1.a

1.b Seeds for wet and dry seasons (BGD, IND) and early monsoon season (BGD)

multiplied and distributed to network partners1.b 1.b

1.c Salt and submergence tolerant wet season varieties evaluated on-station

and on-farm (BGD, IND)1.c 1.c

1.d Salt tolerant dry season varieties evaluated on station and on-farm (BGD,

IND)1.d

1.e Early monsoon season varieties evaluated on station and on-farm (BGD)1.e

1.f Farmers field days for PVS evaluation accomplished (BGD, IND) 1.f 1.f 1.f 1.f

1.g Results of evaluation documented in project progress report (BGD, IND.

IRRI)1.g 1.g 1.g

1.h Synthesizing reports and publications



26/60

Project Name

Date

No.

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1


February 26, 2011

2011 2012

2 More productive, profitable, resilient & diversified rice-based cropping systems

Activities 2.1 Hypothesis formation, design of on station and on farm experiments for 3

sites in BDG and 2 sites in IND; revise annually

2.2 Implementing experiments

2.3 Data analysis and interpretation

2.4 Participatory evaluation of the experimented cropping systems and

technologies

2.5 Documenting experiment results and evaluation in 6 month and annual

project progress report (BGD, IND)

2.6 Production of technical cropping system package

Milestones 2.a Experiment protocols (annually) 2.a 2.a 2.a

2.b Experiment results and participatory evaluation documented in 6 month

and annual project progress report (BGD, IND)2.b 2.b 2.b

2.c Draft and final versions of cropping system technical package - systems,germplasm, management tailored to different site situations



27/60

Project Name

Date

No.

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1


February 26, 2011

2011 2012

3 Improved homestead production systems

Activities 3.1 Literature review of homestead iconology and farming systems in the

coastal of BGD and IND

3.2 Household Survey of homestead economy and farming systems at the

study sites in BDG and IND

3.3 Proposal/experiment design for testing varieties/technologies and farming

systems to increase productivity and nutrition value of products from

homestead (revised annually)

3.4 Participatory experiment and evaluation of the experimented homestead

technologies and production systems



3.6 Production of technical homestead packages

Milestones 3.a Literature review and knowledge gaps identified 3.a.

3.b Report of survey findings, strategies for improving homestead identified3.b

3.c Experiment/study protocol (revised annually) 3.c 3.c

3.d Experiment results and participatory evaluation documented in 6 month

and annual project progress report (BGD, IND)3.d 3.d

3.e Draft and final versions of homestead farming systems technical package



28/60

Project Name

Date

No.

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1


February 26, 2011

2011 2012

Output 4 Brackish water aquatic production systems

Activities 4.1 Literature review, hypothesis formation, design of on station and on farm

experiments in BDG IND; revise annually

4.2 Implementing experiments

4.3 Data analysis and interpretation

4.4 Participatory evaluation of the experimented brackish aquaculture systems

and technologies



4.6 Production of technical aquaculture system package

Milestones 4.a Literature review and Experiment protocols (annually) 4.a 4.a

4.b Experiment results and participatory evaluation documented in 6 month

and annual project progress report (BGD, IND)4.b 4.b

4.c Draft and final versions of brackish aquaculture system technical package -

systems, species/varieties, management

Output 5 Technology and policy recommendations for up- and out-scaling

Activities 5.1 Farmers training for management of new varieties, technologies and

cropping systems

5.2 Preparation of extension material (leaflets, procures, etc) for the new

varieties, technologies and cropping systems in local languages

5.3 Policy dialogues with decision makers and ministerial level policy makers

Milestones 5.a Training materials and reports produced 5.a 5.a

5.b Extension materials produced 5.b

5.c Policy dialogues organized 5.c



29/60

Schedule of Reports and Payments


Date

No. Amount (US$) Comment Due Date

1

Paid on return of the signed Award Letter. These funds are to

cover the first six months activities of the Project

2Paid following satisfactory assessment of progress of the first 6

months of project implementation.

3Paid following satisfactory assessment of progress of the first

12 months of project implementation.

4Paid following satisfactory assessment of progress of the 18


5

Paid following satisfactory assessment of progress of the 24

months of project implementation. The milestone plan for the

following two years of project activities must also be approved.

6Paid following satisfactory assessment of progress of 30


7

Paid following satisfactory assessment of progress of 36

months of project implementation. A review may also be

undertaken at this point at the discretion of the CPWF.

8Paid on acceptance of the Project Completion Report and an

external audit report.

This worksheet will be filled by CPWF Finance Officer for contracting

CPWF Project Workbook Schedule of Reports and Payments Page 29


30/60

Budget Summary

Project Name

Date

2011 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL

1 PERSONNEL REMUNERATION, TRAVEL AND ACCOMMODATION

1.1 PERSONNEL

1.1.1 Project Leader 13,125 14,319 14,749 3,714 45,907

1.1.2 Principal Investigators (Int'L & Reg'l) 18,070 16,680 17,180 4,326 56,256

1.1.3 Principal Investigators (National) - - - -

1.1.4 Consultants 4,649 6,199 6,199 1,550 18,597

1.1.5 Support Staff 13,523 18,705 19,642 4,970 56,840

1.1.6 Other Project Participants 27,308 47,147 51,868 13,063 139,386

1.2 TRAVEL AND ACCOMMODATION

1.2.1 Project Leader 1,209 1,649 1,698 428 4,984

1.2.2 Principal Investigators (Int'L & Reg'l) 1,211 1,652 1,701 428 4,992

1.2.3 Principal Investigators (National) -

1.2.4 Consultants 1,125 1,500 1,500 375 4,500

1.2.5 Support Staff 2,655 3,633 3,757 947 10,992

1.2.6 Other Project Participants 1,615 2,245 2,368 600 6,828

2 RESEARCH OPERATION

2.1 EQUIPMENT

2.1.1 Office equipment -

2.1.2 Laboratory equipment -

2.1.3 Field equipment -

2.2 CONSUMABLES

2.2.1 General communication expenses -

2.2.2 Office supplies -2.2.3 Laboratory supplies 2,184 2,977 3,067 772 9,000

2.2.4 Field research supplies 3,640 4,962 5,111 1,287 15,000

2.2.5 Other support services (IT services,

public areas, facilities) 26,287 35,576 35,259 8,774 105,896

2.3 COMMUNICATIONS

2.3.1 Communications products -

2.3.2 Team meetings -

2.3.3 Stakeholders workshops -

2.3.4 Participation in Reflection Workshops 3,375 4,500 4,125 1,000 13,000

2.3.5 Participation in IFWF3 and IFWF4 7,000 - 7,000 - 14,000

3 LUMP SUM CONTRACT AGREEMENTS FOR SPECIFIC DELIVERABLES

3.1 WFC 49,010 73,790 71,343 17,397 211,540

3.2 BRRI 36,236 45,316 43,940 10,954 136,446

3.3 BRAC 10,905 18,176 12,117 2,424 43,622

3.4 BFRI 20,816 29,112 29,490 7,366 86,784

3.5 CSSRI (india) 21,211 25,731 25,406 6,395 78,7433.6 CIBA (India) 21,511 25,231 25,131 6,370 78,243

3.7 Others in BGD (including students) 11,633 15,510 13,329 3,150 43,622

4 MISCELLANEOUS

4.1 CONTINGENCY (% OF BUDGET) -

4.2 OVERHEADS 22,677 29,688 29,937 7,520 89,822

Administrative cost (12%) 16,349 20,623 21,252 5,398 63,622

Management fee (4%) 6,328 9,065 8,685 2,122 26,200[INSTITUTION (% ] -

[INSTITUTION (% ] -

[INSTITUTION (% ]

G2: Productive, profitable, and resilient agriculture and aquaculture systems

2011-02-26; revised 2011-04-04


31/60

Budget CommentsPlease provide as much information as possible to enable a good understanding of the key expenditures required.

Project Name

Project G2: Resilient Intensified and Diversified Agriculture and

Aquaculture Systems

Date

COMMENTS

MATCHING FUND (if any) IRRI's Project STRASA works in the same same area and will

provide matching fund 10% of time of Dr. Ismail and Tao Li in 3

years. Some amount will be designated to attendance of IFWF

1

PERSONNEL REMUNERATION, TRAVEL AND

ACCOMMODATION

1.1 PERSONNEL

1.1.1 Project Leader Dr. Tuong is the project Leader until August, 2011, requests

fund to cover 5% of his time. After that, Dr. Liz Humphreys will

be the Project Leader, requesting 10% of her salary for the

whole three years.

1.1.2 Principal Investigators (Int'L & Reg'l) Funds are requested to support Dr Ismail 10% time per year forthree years .Personnel costs are based on actual annual

salaries and benefits for on-board employees and on IRRIs

standard personnel costs for new staff. The subsequent years

include estimated escalations for merits adjustments which is

3% per year for the IRS.

1.1.3 Principal Investigators (National)

1.1.4 Consultants Dr. Tuong (after his retirement with IRRI) will share 5% of his

time each year for 3 years as a consultant for this project.

1.1.5 Support Staff Funds are also requested to support three nationally recruited

staff (NRS) that will assist the project leader and principal

investigator in monitoring the project. Cabangon and Parreowho will be based in IRRI Philippines will allocate 30% of their

time each year while the Level 3 TBD staff who will be based in

Bangladesh will allot 100% of his time for the project.Personnel

costs are based on actual annual salaries and benefits for on-

board employees and on IRRIs standard personnel costs for

new staff. The subsequent years include estimated escalations

for merits adjustments which is 5% per year for the NRS.

1.1.6 Other Project Participants Funds are also requested to support Dr. Tao Li's 10% time for

year 2 to year 3.One Post doc fellow (PDF) will be hired and

based to Bangladesh to monitor the project. 60% of his time

will be charged here, 40% will be covered by Project CPWF G1.Personnel costs are based on actual annual salaries and

benefits for on-board employees and on IRRIs standard

personnel costs for new staff. The subsequent years include

estimated escalations for merits adjustments which is 3% per

year for the IRS and PDF.

CPWF Project Workbook Budget Comments Page 31 of 60


32/60

1.2 TRAVEL AND ACCOMMODATION

1.2.1 Project Leader This includes cost for the PL once a year visit in Bangladesh to

monitor the project and attend annual meeting. Other trips

will be supported by other Projects in Bangladesh and India

where Dr. Tuong and Humphreys also works

1.2.2 Principal Investigators (Int'L & Reg'l) This consists of all costs related to once a year visit of one PI in

Bangladesh to monitor the project including their

accommodation and per diem. At least one other trip will bepaid by other IRRI projects in the same area

1.2.3 Principal Investigators (National)

1.2.4 Consultants For the consultant to visit the field. Other trips will be

shouldered by IRRI projects in the same area

1.2.5 Support Staff This is the travel cost of level 3 staff (based in BGD) for

monitoring the field including his accommodation and per

diem for 20 days stay there.

1.2.6 Other Project Participants This consists of all costs related to field visit of the Postdoc

fellow based in Bangladesh including their accommodation and

per diem. At least one other trip will be paid by other IRRI

projects in the same area

2 RESEARCH OPERATION

2.1 EQUIPMENT

2.1.1 Office equipment

2.1.2 Laboratory equipment

2.1.3

Field equipment To be used in Bangladesh and India which is included in NARES

lumpsum contract.

2.2 CONSUMABLES

2.2.1 General communication expenses

2.2.2 Office supplies

2.2.3

Laboratory supplies A total of $9,000 for 3 years is requested for consumables,

chemicals and enzymes in the lab, and other laboratory

supplies

2.2.4

Field research supplies This will cover cost for seed increase and shipment of breeding

lines.

2.2.5 Other support services (IT services, public

areas, facilities)

These are identified direct costs which includes information

technology services such as desktop and network connection

and operational and research support services . The

operational support services are expenses for safety, security,

energy cost, depreciation , rent, insurance and building

maintenance. The research support services include the library,

risk management and quality assurance, communication and

publications,intellectual property management, country office

coordination,support from office of the Deputy Director

General for Research, External Relation, Seed Health and

Project Coordination office. The above items are not part ofrefer overhead under 4.2

2.3 COMMUNICATIONS

2.3.1 Communications products

2.3.2 Team meetings Will be combined with trips for Reflection Workshop

2.3.3 Stakeholders workshops Will be combined with trips for Reflection Workshop



33/60

2.3.4

Participation in Reflection Workshops This also covers cost for annual meetings and semi annual

meeting. The amount for NARES attendance are included in

their lump sum contract

2.3.5

Participation in IFWF3 and IFWF4 This covers cost to attend the IFWF3 and 4. The amount for

NARES attendance are included in their lump sum contract



34/60

3

LUMP SUM CONTRACT AGREEMENTS FOR

SPECIFIC DELIVERABLES

3.1

WFC Assist in project management, monitoring and communication,

especially in aquaculture activities. Signing appropriate

subcontracts with, and responsible for timely fund

disbursement to, BFRI and CIBA. In charge of improving

aquaculture technologies for ponds in homestead; Oversee the

implementation of experiments and field works in aquaculturesystems. Responsible for data analysis and interpretation; and

high quality reports and scientific publications relating to

aquaculture. give due guidance to BFRI and CIBA. The budget

for WFC includes $20,000 for BFRI and CIBA to participate in

Reflection workshop and the International Forum for Water

and Food

3.2

BRRI In charge of field experiments in rice based systems and

agriculture in homesteads in BGD, especially in germplasm

testing and seed multiplication/delivery network

3.3BRAC collaborate in field experiments in cropping systems and

variety testing

3.4

BFRI (sub contract with WFC) Under the sub contract with WFC,In charge of field

experiments relating to brackish water aquaculture systems

and aquaculture components in homestead, BGD

3.5

CSSRI (India) In charge of field experiments in rice based systems and

agriculture in homesteads in India, especially in germplasm

testing and seed multiplication/delivery network

3.6

CIBA (India - sub contract with WFC) Under the sub contract with WFC,In charge of field

experiments relating to brackish water aquaculture systems

and aquaculture components in homestead, India

3.7

Others in BGD (including graduate students) These may include Khulna University, Bangladesh Agricultural

University, Calcutta University where students working with

the project register. Others e.g. SocioConsult may be asked to

carry out household survey of homestead production systems

and economy

4 MISCELLANEOUS

4.1 CONTINGENCY (% OF BUDGET)

4.2 OVERHEADS

Indirect cost The indirect cost will include the other necessaryadministrative costs which cannot be specifically identified as

direct costs of the activity such as support from Director

General Office, Finance, Procurement, Legal services, Human

Resourse services, etc.

[INSTITUTION (% ]

[INSTITUTION (% ]

[INSTITUTION (% ]

[INSTITUTION (% ]



35/60

taff Time Allocation and Breakdown of Personnel Costs

roject Name

ate

2011 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL

1.1 PL To Phuc Tuong (Liz Humphreys

in year 2 and 3)

IRRI CGIAR Oversight: project M&E,

communication; contribute to

resource management of rice

based cropping systems

18 22 22 6 68

1.2 PI (Int'l) Abdelbagi Ismail IRRI CGIAR Oversight: germplasm

validation and seed distribution

network

16 22 22 6 66

Elizabeth Humphreys IRRI CGIAR contribute to resourcemanagement of rice based

cropping systems

9 9

Manjurul Karim WFC CGIAR oversight: aquaculture

activities, communication in

aquaculture

0

Michael John Phillips WFC CGIAR aquaculture technologies 0

under "lump sum contract" with WFC


2011-03-10; revised 2011-04-04

No. Personnel Name Institution Days per YearType of

Institution

Brief Description of Contribution

to Project, as described in G1

Contacts (Project Workbook)


WF Project Workbook Staff Time Allocation and Breakdown of Personnel Costs Page 3


36/60


roject Name

ate

2011 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL

2011-03-10; revised 2011-04-04


Institution





1.2 PI (Reg'l) Benoy Kumar Barman WFC CGIAR M&E; coordinator of

aquaculture activities

0

1.3 PI (Nat'l) Rafiqul Islam BRRI NARES germplasm validation and seed

distribution network, BGD

0

Alamgir Alam BFRI NARES Aquaculture technologies and

systems, BGD

0

Bimal K. Bandyopadhyay CSSRI NARES Germ plasm and Rice based

cropping systems, IND

0

Jitendra Kumar Sundary CIBA NARES aquaculture systems, IND 0

1.4 Consultants To Phuc Tuong 8 11 11 3 33

Under "lump sum" contract




37/60


roject Name

ate

2011 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL

2011-03-10; revised 2011-04-04


Institution





.1.5 Support

Staff

Rexie Jane Parreo IRRI CGIAR involved in facilitating supply of

seeds for objective 1, purchase

of supplies and equipments,

arrangement of travel for

meetings and site visits for IRRI

partners and in compiling of

reports and in other

communication activities

49 65 65 16 195

Romeo Cabangon IRRI CGIAR directly involved in planning,

execution and monitoring of

research activities of most ofG2, specially objectives 2, 3 and

5. He will regularly visit the

project sites for monitoring

with local staff

49 65 65 16 195

Research Technician(TBD) in

Bangladesh

IRRI CGIAR assist PL and PI in project

monitoring and field visit

163 217 217 54 651



38/60


roject Name

ate

2011 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL

2011-03-10; revised 2011-04-04


Institution





1.6 Other

Project

Participants

Tao Li IRRI CGIAR Crop modeling 16 22 6 44

Postdoc (TBD) IRRI CGIAR Based in BGD; day to day

management of the project,

contribute to rice-based

cropping systems

98 130 130 32 390



39/60

taff Time Allocation and Breakdown of

roject Name

ate


in year 2 and 3)

1.2 PI (Int'l) Abdelbagi Ismail

Elizabeth Humphreys

Manjurul Karim

Michael John Phillips

2011-03-10; revised 2011-04-04

No. Personnel Name

Productive, profitable, and resili

2011 2012 2013 2014

730 for TPT

and 648 for

EH; annual

increase 3%

13,125 14,319 14,749 3,714 45,907

764 ;

annual

increase 3%

12,235 16,680 17,180 4,326 50,421

648 ;annual

increase 3%

5,835 - 5,835

-

-

18,070 16,680 17,180 4,326 56,256

Total (US$)Personnel CostsDaily

Charge Out

(US$)



40/60


roject Name

ate 2011-03-10; revised 2011-04-04

No. Personnel Name


1.2 PI (Reg'l) Benoy Kumar Barman

1.3 PI (Nat'l) Rafiqul Islam

Alamgir Alam

Bimal K. Bandyopadhyay

Jitendra Kumar Sundary

1.4 Consultants To Phuc Tuong

2011 2012 2013 2014


Charge Out

(US$)

-

- - - - -

-

-

-

-

- - - -

4,649 6,199 6,199 1,550 18,597

4,649 6,199 6,199 1,550 18,597



41/60


roject Name

ate 2011-03-10; revised 2011-04-04

No. Personnel Name


1.5 Support

Staff

Rexie Jane Parreo

Romeo Cabangon


Bangladesh

2011 2012 2013 2014


Charge Out

(US$)

54 ; annual

increase 5%

2,475 3,423 3,595 910 10,403

87.5 ;

annual

increase 5%

4,055 5,609 5,889 1,490 17,043

45 ; annual

increase 5%

6,993 9,673 10,158 2,570 29,394

13,523 18,705 19,642 4,970 56,840



42/60


roject Name

ate 2011-03-10; revised 2011-04-04

No. Personnel Name


1.6 Other

Project

Participants

Tao Li

Postdoc (TBD)

2011 2012 2013 2014


Charge Out

(US$)

610 ;

annual

increase 3%

9,919 13,522 3,406 26,847

288 ;

annual

increase 3%

27,308 37,228 38,346 9,657 112,539

27,308 47,147 51,868 13,063 139,386

TOTAL 76,675 103,050 109,638 27,623 316,986



43/60


roject Name

ate


in year 2 and 3)

1.2 PI (Int'l) Abdelbagi Ismail

Elizabeth Humphreys

Manjurul Karim

Michael John Phillips

2011-03-10; revised 2011-04-04

No. Personnel Name


1 2 3 4 5 6

1 1 1 1 1 5

1 1 1 1 4

1 1 1 1 4

1 1 1 3

1 1 1 3

Outputs

Entries from Column S are added for reviewers'

comments and to note items for clarification. There

should be a clear assignment of outputs. Mark (with

1) lead and contributed outputs in columns (S) to (X)

Total

WF Project Workbook Staff Time Allocation and Breakdown of Personnel Costs Pag


44/60


roject Name

ate 2011-03-10; revised 2011-04-04

No. Personnel Name


.1.2 PI (Reg'l) Benoy Kumar Barman

1.3 PI (Nat'l) Rafiqul Islam

Alamgir Alam

Bimal K. Bandyopadhyay

Jitendra Kumar Sundary

.1.4 Consultants To Phuc Tuong

1 2 3 4 5 6

Outputs





Total

1 1 1 3

1 1 1 3

1 1 1 3

1 1 1 1 4

1 1 1 1 4

1 1 1 1 1 5



45/60


roject Name

ate 2011-03-10; revised 2011-04-04

No. Personnel Name


.1.5 Support

Staff

Rexie Jane Parreo

Romeo Cabangon


Bangladesh

1 2 3 4 5 6

Outputs





Total

1 1 1 1 1 5

1 1 2

1 1 1 1 4



46/60


roject Name

ate 2011-03-10; revised 2011-04-04

No. Personnel Name


1.6 Other

Project

Participants

Tao Li

Postdoc (TBD)

1 2 3 4 5 6

Outputs





Total

1 1

1 1 1 1 1 5

10 11 13 9 12 0 55



47/60

Indicative Breakdown of Budget by OutputBudget does not include overhead costs

Project Name

Date

Output Institution $ value of the budget % share of the budget

IRRI 160,865 13%

WFC - 0%

BRRI 61,818 5%

BRAC 16,275 1%

BFRI - 0%

CSSRI 31,659 2%

CIBA - 0%

Other BD 11,254 1%

Total for Output 1 281,871 22%

IRRI 182,643 14%

WFC 21,459 2%

BRRI 37,083 3%

BRAC 27,347 2%

BFRI 12,274 1%

CSSRI 25,450 2%

CIBA 12,139 1%

Other BD 5,810 0%


IRRI 119,023 9%

WFC 44,816 4%

BRRI 22,924 2%

BRAC - 0%BFRI 17,384 1%

CSSRI 13,111 1%

CIBA 16,682 1%

Other BD 26,557 2%


IRRI 51,749 4%

WFC 117,447 9%

BRRI - 0%

BRAC - 0%

BFRI 49,960 4%

CSSRI - 0%CIBA 41,826 3%

Other BD - 0%


IRRI 81,720 6%

WFC 27,818 2%

BRRI 14,622 1%

BRAC - 0%

BFRI 7,165 1%

2011-02-26; revised 2011-04-04


Output No. 5: Technology and policy

recommendations

Output No. 1: new germplasm

validated and seed distribution

network established)

Output No. 2: 2. More productive,profitable, resilient & diversified rice-

based cropping systems

Output No. 3: 3. Improved homestead

production systems

Output No. 4: Brackish water aquatic

production systems

CPWF Project Workbook Indicative Breakdown of Budget by Output Page 47 of 60


48/60

Project Name

Date

Output Institution $ value of the budget % share of the budget

2011-02-26; revised 2011-04-04


CSSRI 8,522 1%CIBA 7,596 1%

Other BD - 0%


TOTAL 1,275,000

CPWF Project Workbook Indicative Breakdown of Budget by Output Page 48 of 60


49/60

Indicative Breakdown of Budget by Institution

Project Name

Date

Institution Total $ value Total % share Comments

IRRI 596,000 47% Includes institutional cost and

management fee

WFC 211,540 17% This include $20,000 funds for BFRIand CIBA to attend reflection

workshop and Water Forum

BRRI 136,446 11% This include $3,500 to be kept at IRRI

but used by NARES to attend the

Reflection workshops and Water

Forum

BRAC 43,622 3%

BFRI (sub contract

with WFC)

86,784 7%

CSSRI (india) 78,743 6% This includes $3,500 to be kept at IRRI

for the use of NARES to attend the

Reflection workshops and WaterForum

CIBA (India - sub

contract with

WFC)

78,243 6%

Others in BGD

(including

students)

43,622 3%

TOTAL 1,275,000 1


2011-02-26; revised 2011-04-04


50/60


51/60


52/60


53/60


54/60


55/60


56/60


57/60


58/60


59/60

by institute by output Adjustments to be made

IRRI 596,000 596,000 (0)

WFC 211,540 211,540 (0)

BRRI 136,446 136,446 (0)

BRAC 43,622 43,622 (0)

BFRI 86,784 86,784 (0)CSSRI (india) 78,743 78,743 0

CIBA (India) 78,243 78,243 (0)

Others in BGD (including students) 43,622 43,622 0

TOTAL 1,275,000 1,275,000 (0)


60/60

(0)

(0)

(0)

(0)

(0)0

(0)

0

G2 Annex 2 Project Workbook 2012-04-2 Update

Documents

Transcript of G2 Annex 2 Project Workbook 2012-04-2 Update