Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations...

49
Futures for learning June 14 2006 Merida, Mexico Tom Bentley Demos [email protected] www.demos.co.uk

Transcript of Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations...

Page 1: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Futures for learning

June 14 2006Merida, MexicoTom [email protected]

Page 2: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Outline

Valuing educationGlobal change; new pressuresStrategic goals; in conflict? Durable inequalitiesWhy are school systems so resilient?Understanding adaptive changeTowards a systems viewModels of learning and innovation

Page 3: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Education systems combine many levels of meaning and work

Ancient historical practice and tradition: pedagogyShared social and cultural commitment: identityNeighbourhood and class structure: social orderDesign and evolution of state: entitlementIndividual and family endeavour: aspiration

Page 4: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

But they operate in new conditions

Collective resource shortages: climate, water, oilPopulation pressures, urban growth, generational changeGreater interconnectedness, communication, mobilityGrowing distance from traditional identities, institutional categoriesAn explosion of knowledge and information

All driven by more intense economic competition and growing social power of individualism;

Page 5: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Many factors

Demography

Values andidentity

Science

Natural resources

Governance

People flow

Economic exchange

DigitalTechnology

Education

Page 6: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Source: Society at a Glance 2005, GE2Source: OECD (2005), Society at a Glance 2005

Page 7: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Young people aged 0-24

0250,000500,000750,000

1,000,0001,250,0001,500,0001,750,0002,000,0002,250,0002,500,0002,750,0003,000,0003,250,0003,500,000

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

2020

2030

2040

2050

Thousands

Less developed regionsMore developed regionsWorld

Source: Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat, World Population Prospects: The 2004 Revision and World Urbanization Prospects: The 2003 Revision, http://esa.un.org/unpp, 13 December 2005; 1:27:30 PM.

Page 8: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Europe40 %

North & South America

22 %

Asia21 %

Africa9 %

Caribbean7 %

Oceania1 %

Foreign-born population in OECD countries, by region of origin

Source: Trends in International Migration, OECD 2005

People flow

Other Africa55 %

North Africa45 %

Other Asia81 %

China and Chinese Taipei19 %

Latin America

87 %

North America

13 %

EU 2563 %

Other Europe37 %

Page 9: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Source: Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat, World Population Prospects: The 2004 Revision and World Urbanization Prospects: The 2003 Revision, http://esa.un.org/unpp, 13 December 2005; 12:10:14 PM.

Population living in urban areas

0102030405060708090

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

2020

2030 Year

%

More developedcountriesLess developedcountries

City dwelling

Page 10: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Source: ICT Outlook 2004

Internet access

Page 11: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Growing connections

Page 12: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Feed new social dynamics

A gender revolution?New disparities

Page 13: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Figure 1The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations

1. Year of reference 2002.Source: Education at a Glance 2005 , Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Age group 25-34 yearsAge group 55-64 years

Countries are ranked in descending order of the difference between the percentage of females and the percentage of males who have attained tertiary-type A and advanced research programmes in the age group 25-34 years.

Percentage of females attaining tertiary-type A and advanced research

programmes

Percentage of males attaining tertiary-type A and advanced research programmes

Percentage of females attaining tertiary-type A and advanced research

programmes

Percentage of males attaining tertiary-type A and advanced research programmes

50 25 0 25 50

Norway

Denmark

Spain

Poland

Portugal

Finland

Sweden

Canada

Australia

Hungary

Greece

France

United States

New Zealand

Italy 1

Iceland1

Slovak Republic

Netherlands1

Ireland

Austria

Luxembourg

Germany

Czech Republic

United Kingdom

Belgium

Turkey

Mexico

Korea

Switzerland

Japan

50 25 0 25 50

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

Gender gap in tertiary education, 30s and 60s

Page 14: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Growth in employment rates: women, average annual growth in percentage, 1990-2003

Source: OECD Factbook 2005

Page 15: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.
Page 16: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Source: Health at a Glance 2005

Equality – inequality, 1980s-2000

Page 17: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Source: UNDP (2005), Human Development Report

Source: OECD (2001), The Creative Society of the 21st Century

Global income distribution

Page 18: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Education reform strategies: facing all ways?

Standards based reform to improve attainment outcomesMeasures to improve participation and completion for vulnerable people; poverty reduction, early yearsLiteracy and numeracy strategiesNew infrastructure, especially ICTsWorkforce reformCivic engagement and community cohesionEducation for innovation and creativityExpanding higher education and research

Page 19: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

A new global economy

With learning at the heart of competitiveness?

Page 20: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Education: the route to prosperity?

In a recent analysis by the C.D. Howe Institute of Canada, Coulombe& Tremblay (2005) drew this powerful conclusion:

“A country’s literacy scores rising by one percent relative to the international average is associated with an eventual 2.5 percentrelative rise in labour productivity and a 1.5 percent arise in GDP per head. These effects are three times as great as for investment in physical capital. Moreover, the results include that raising literacy and numeracy scores for people at the bottom of the skills distribution is more important to economic growth than producing more highly skilled graduates.”

Page 21: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Fastest Growing Occupations in the US

Medical assistantsNetwork systems and data communications analystsPhysician assistantsSocial and human service assistantsHome health aidesMedical records and health information techniciansPhysical therapist aidesComputer software engineers, applicationsComputer software engineers, systems softwarePhysical therapist assistants

Page 22: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.
Page 23: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Source: The impact of training on productivity and wages: evidence from British panel data, Dearden, Reed and van Reenan, 2005. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Volume 16, Number 3, 2000.

Page 24: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

But this means uneven distribution…

Page 25: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Companies with higher skills base have higher productivity growth…

Page 26: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Nations…

Page 27: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.
Page 28: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

The skilled get upskilled even further

Less than one third of adults with no qualifications participate in learning compared to 94% of those with at least level 4 qualifications.

Only 52% of those with basic skills difficulties take part in learning compared to 83% of those without.

While others are deterred…

Among those with no qualifications who don’t engage in lifelong learning, 30% say this is the case because they lack qualifications

Participation by those from low-income households is 40% lower than participation by those from high-income households

Page 29: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Durable inequality; how schooling entrenches inequity

Different outcomes are only partly explained by internal variation in the school and teacher performanceIt is how formal organisation interacts with wider patterns of economic, social and cultural resources that makes the bigger differenceSchooling systems will not overcome growing patterns of exclusion and marginalisation by incrementally improving their attainment scores

So teaching, resourcing, leadership all matter, but they cannot work in isolation from the wider context

Page 30: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Some consequences…

In the US by 1993 the income gap between those who had not finished secondary school and those with just a high-school certificate was as large as that between non-completers and graduates had been twenty years before.

Among German men the unqualified are more than three times as likely to be out of work as those with degrees. In the USA the difference is fivefold.

In England, those who reach the expected standard of numeracy and literacy by age 11 have a 70 % chance of getting the qualifications at 16 they need to head towards higher education. For those who do not reach the same threshold at 11, their chances of the same at 16 are 12%.

In Australia, the worst off 25 % of students are twice as likely to score badly in reading tests as those not in the bottom quartile of the wealth distribution.

Page 31: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.
Page 32: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Students versus schools background effects

Page 33: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

To recap

Global forces are creating massive new pressures, but also new opportunitiesThe current dynamics of knowledge and human capital investment are actually widening inequalityDiversity and flexibility could lead to new peaks of achievement and fulfilment, but somehow these factors can actually combine to make the distribution of opportunity and reward more rigid and unfair

Understandably, frustration with education reform is growing

Page 34: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

The reforming response

AccountabilityResourcesCompetitionProductivityPerformance incentives‘Leadership’Sending signals through chains of command to enhance performancewithin existing institutional parameters

Page 35: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

But why are school systems so resilient? ‘buffering’ - Elmore

Page 36: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

A different starting point?

We cannot remake our education institutions while the division of learning labour between institutions, families and communities remains artificially separated

We need to understand the resilience of institutions as part of our collective capacity to adapt

We need to uncover the dynamics of social and economic adaptation in order to build new learning systems

Page 37: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Learning as a complex, collective process

capacity building involves any policy, strategy or other action undertaken that increases the collective efficacy of a group to raise the bar and close the gap of student learning for all students.

Usually it consists of the development of three components in concert: new knowledge and competencies; new enhanced resources; and new and deeper motivation and commitment to improve things—again, all played out collectively.

Michael Fullan, Beyond Turnaround Leadership, 2006.

Page 38: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Complex adaptive systems

More than the sum of partsDefined by relationships and interdependencesCapable of sustaining flexibility and coherenceAble to adapt continuously over time in response to environmental changeComposed of many different autonomous members

Page 39: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.
Page 40: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Towards a system view of learning

We are born programmed to learn We shape our dispositions and learning capacities through repeated encounters with the world; school systems are one small sliceSchool systems are resilient because they are adaptiveBut they unintentionally screen out many of the resources we could be using to boost the motivation, resilience, ability of our learnersWe need systems – and innovations – that connect learners to more powerful, plentiful and flexible learning resourcesThe most important reform strategies will be those which integrate most resources around the learner, not those that refocus the school

Page 41: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.
Page 42: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.
Page 43: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

LearningPractices

Individual choices, aspirations

Identities, collective belonging

Organisational regime and leadership

Innovation, R&D Systems

Knowledge domains and their fields of practice

Local communities

Policy, regulation, inspection, audit

Local Governance Institutions Market

Bridging networks

Page 44: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Changing models of innovation

Open Source,

User-driven

Peer networks

Modular innovation

D&R

Feeds input directly into itself

eg Linux, Wikipedia

Expert patients, Horse’s mouth

Networked Learning communities

BMW virtual innovation centreProject Zero, SSAT

Toyota TQS

Page 45: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

We need system reforms that…

Broaden the range of innovators working on a shared challengeUse central policy to frame and connect elements of local systems, and make whole systems more transparentSurround formal schooling with new learning communities that caninteract positively with themHarness the voice and motivations of students themselvesConnect directly with family learning and wellbeingBuild organisational frameworks whose learning becomes self-sustaining

Page 46: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Learning: outlines of a new system?

Personal learning networks

Online providers, career support

Employer, university

Work-life integration

Lifelong learning

Peer networks, interests

Learning for work, mentoring

School Federations

Personal adviser

14-19

Friendship groups

Parks and neighbourhoods

Extended primary school

Family learning, out-of school activities

5-14

Parenting networks

Primary health, libraries

NurseryEarly play, music, emotional support

Early years

Informal communities

Related servicesCore learning institution

Family and individual

Page 47: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

Student motivation

and responsibility

Supportive networksof informal learningand information flow

Professional learning

communities

Transparency,legitimacy,

community support

Organisationalflexibility, innovation

Powerfulpedagogical

practices

Page 48: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

It follows that the most powerful system changes will combine internal and external resources

Schools and research knowledgeCore curriculum and extended learning programmeFace to face and online communityExpert tutor and work-based practiceHome and library or museumFamily and teachers

We have the opportunity to develop systems through which these connections can emerge and generate their own positive momentum

Page 49: Futures for learning · Figure 1 The gender gap in tertiary qualifications across two generations 1. Year of reference 2002. Source: Education at a Glance 2005, Tables A1.3b and A1.3c.

“It appears from early research that school systems that improve are those that have succeeded in getting people to internalize the expectations of standards-based accountability systems, and that they have managed this internalization largely through modeling commitment and focus using face-to-face relationships, not bureaucratic controls. The basic process at work here is… learning new behaviours and values that are associated with collective responsibility for teaching practice and student learning.”

(Elmore, 2004 a:82)