Future demands on the local state
-
Upload
orlando-butler -
Category
Documents
-
view
25 -
download
4
description
Transcript of Future demands on the local state
The DCLG project
“A review of what society is likely to
be like in 2015 and its implications
for local government and local
governance.”
Future demands
• Drivers of change and pressures on government
• Society in 2015: the building blocks
• The key functions of local governance in 2015
• Some personal reflections drawing on the project
Major drivers of change• Globalisation creates greater competition• Knowledge and service sectors dominate• More & more varied households • Diverging educational attainment • Extreme weather events • Pressures on land use• Demand for ‘clean solutions’ • More elderly and disabled• Greater difference within and between areas • Rising expectations of quality of life • All pervasive ICT• Conflict around service, privacy and security • New forms of politics
Pressures on Government
fiscal & taxation; education & skills; employment & productivity; environment & habitat; health, public health & social services; housing & land use; leisure culture & media; localities and neighbourhoods; public order, justice and security; social protection & benefits; trade & industry; transport & travel;
Society in 2015
Pulling together all the views we have collected, we have identified 4 building blocks of society in 2015:• More households and more varied types of household;• A more diverse society with, for example, more elderly
and more disabled people, wider differences in wealth and ethnic divides;
• Continued technological development and global change [with a particular impact on those with poor educational attainment];
• More “extreme” weather and growing environmental pressures.
A more diverse society with, for example, more elderly and more disabled people, wider
differences in household wealth and ethnic divides;
Households by religious affiliation
Source: ODPM
Quality of life by region
Source: DEFRA
The Variation in Quality of Life FactorsAcross the English Regions
Economically active by qualification level
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
1991 1999 2005 2010
year
econ
omic
ally
act
ive
popu
lati
on (
000s
)
Levels 4 & 5
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
No qual
Economically Active Population
Western markets less significant in 2015
China 1
India 2
USA 3
Indonesia 4
Pakistan 5
Japan 10
Germany 17
France 23
UK 24
Italy 25
127 8 9 10 1160 1 2 3 4 5
Hundreds of Millions
13 14 15
1409.1 M
1211.7 M
310.8 M
251.8 M
224.5 M
125.8 M
82.1 M
60.2 M
59.0 M
54.6 M
Population 2015, Ranked
In 2015 the EU, USA and Japan combined will equalless than half the Chinese population
Source: UN, Economist
WasteWaste Arisings and Management
Source: DEFRA and others
Temperatures
Change in summer temperature for the 2020s, 2050s and 2080s for low emissions and high
emissions scenarios
Source: UK Climate Impacts Programme
Functions of local governance
Five core tasks:• Coping with stark differences within
and between communities (taking choices about how to respond to the differences within and between communities);
• Caring for a significant proportion of the population (for example older people and those with who do not have the skills to prosper in the changing economy);
Functions of local governance
• Controlling and regulating human and physical flows (from ASBOs to traffic, from access to town centres to drink and entertainment licensing);
• Promoting economic growth and performance (including making a reality of lifelong learning in areas sufferent from economic collapse);
• Strategic marketing (in many areas action by individuals will be as important as action by the state – eg waste recycling).
Functions of local governance
These all reinforce the need for “joined up
government” and led to two further tasks for
local governance:
• Brokering, marshalling and relationship building between key actors;
• Planning and mobilising local resources.
Functions of local governance
Community leadership crucial to:• Build acceptance of difference and responses to
it;• Secure ownership of regulation;• Achieve changes in behaviour.
It hinges on two further tasks:• Providing and making complex information
transparent and accessible• Representation of the locality and community
Reflections
Scale:
• The importance of the conurbation/sub-region;
• Need to ensure that neighbourhood structures don’t entrench inequalities;
• The will always be difficult boundaries; no single arrangement will suit everyone: the challenge is how to manage boundaries.
Reflections
The key question:“Given the trends we have identified, and in particular the development of more acute differences within and between communities, which approach is most likely to ensure that the different needs of different groups are met – a strong focus on national minimum standards, or more scope for local decision-making to respond to the different needs of different groups?”
Reflections
“It’s not what you do it’s the way you do it”
High quality local political leadership key to:• Securing legitimacy for difficult decisions;• Promoting changes in behaviour;• Co-ordinating local players and resources.
Need a more coherent framework for allocating responsibility for the key locally delivered public services
Reflections
• Joined up government will become more rather than less important over the next ten years;
• To meet the challenges that society is likely to face greater citizen engagement with the structures of local governance will be essential, not simply desirable;
• Importance of strategic choice within government.