Fundamentals of Trademark Law in the Global...
Transcript of Fundamentals of Trademark Law in the Global...
© Practising Law Institute
To order this book, call (800) 260-4PLI or fax us at (800) 321-0093. Ask our Customer Service Department for PLI Order Number 149070, Dept. BAV5.
Practising Law Institute1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Fundamentals of Trademark Law in the
Global Marketplace 2016
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYCourse Handbook Series
Number G-1278
Co-ChairsLynn S. Fruchter
Jeffery A. HandelmanAnne Hiaring Hocking
© Practising Law Institute
3
Fundamentals of Trademark Law in the Global Marketplace
Adam D. Resnick
Mosaic Legal Group, PLLC
If you find this article helpful, you can learn more about the subject by going to www.pli.edu to view the on demand program or segment for which it was written.
115
© Practising Law Institute
116
© Practising Law Institute
Pres
ented
by:
Adam
D. R
esni
ckMo
saic
Lega
l Gro
up, P
LLC
Was
hing
ton,
DC
Date
: Jul
y 12,
2016
FUN
DA
MEN
TALS
OF
TRA
DEM
AR
K L
AW IN
TH
E G
LOB
AL
MA
RK
ETPL
AC
E
Prac
tisin
g La
w In
stitu
te®
117
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
2
Wha
t is
a Tr
adem
ark?
Trad
emar
ks a
re w
ords
, nam
es, s
ymbo
ls,
desi
gns,
or o
ther
dis
tinct
ive
item
s w
hich
se
rve
to id
entif
y th
e so
urce
of g
oods
or
serv
ices
and
dis
tingu
ish
them
from
thos
e so
ld
by o
ther
s.
118
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
3
Wha
t is
a Tr
adem
ark?
Trad
emar
ks s
ymbo
lize
good
will
Trad
emar
ks a
re im
porta
nt a
dver
tisin
g to
ols
Trad
emar
ks a
id c
onsu
mer
sTr
adem
arks
are
exc
lusi
ve ri
ghts
119
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
4
Item
s W
hich
Can
Ser
ve a
s Tr
adem
arks
Wor
dsN
ames
Sym
bols
Com
bina
tions
of w
ords
and
des
igns
(i.e
., lo
gos)
120
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
5
Item
s W
hich
Can
Ser
ve a
s Tr
adem
arks
Trad
e dr
ess,
e.g
., pa
ckag
e de
sign
s an
d pr
oduc
t con
figur
atio
nsS
ound
sS
cent
sC
olor
s
121
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
6
122
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
7
123
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
8
124
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
9
Type
s of
Mar
ks
Trad
emar
ksS
ervi
ce m
arks
Cer
tific
atio
n m
arks
Col
lect
ive
mar
ks
125
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
10
126
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
11
127
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
12
128
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
13
129
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
14
Cre
atio
n of
Tra
dem
ark
Rig
hts
Trad
emar
k rig
hts
can
be b
ased
on
com
mon
la
w, s
tate
sta
tute
, or t
he fe
dera
l Tra
dem
ark
Act
of 1
946
(as
amen
ded)
, als
o kn
own
as th
e La
nham
Act
Fede
ral r
egis
tratio
n is
not
a p
rere
quis
ite fo
r tra
dem
ark
right
s, a
lthou
gh re
gist
ratio
n co
nfer
s ke
y be
nefit
s an
d rig
hts
130
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
15
Cre
atio
n of
Tra
dem
ark
Rig
hts
Trad
emar
k rig
hts
can
be a
cqui
red
with
out
regi
stra
tion,
und
er th
e co
mm
on la
w a
nd
Sec
tion
43(a
) of t
he L
anha
m A
ct (w
hich
dea
ls
with
unf
air c
ompe
titio
n), b
y us
ing
a m
ark
in
com
mer
ceas
a tr
adem
ark
However…
Geo
grap
hic
limita
tions
Lack
of f
eder
al s
tatu
tory
pre
sum
ptio
ns a
nd o
ther
be
nefit
s
131
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
16
Cre
atio
n of
Tra
dem
ark
Rig
hts
Fede
ral r
egis
tratio
n af
teru
se e
nhan
ces
com
mon
law
righ
ts a
lread
y ac
quire
d an
d pr
ovid
es a
dditi
onal
righ
ts, s
uch
as a
na
tionw
ide
right
of p
riorit
y as
of t
he fi
ling
date
C
ontin
gent
trad
emar
k rig
hts
can
be a
cqui
red
prio
rto
use
by fi
ling
an a
pplic
atio
n to
fe
dera
lly re
gist
er th
e m
ark
stat
ing
an in
tent
to
use
the
mar
k
132
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
17
Cre
atio
n of
Tra
dem
ark
Rig
hts
The
filin
g of
the
appl
icat
ion
cons
titut
es
cons
truct
ive
use
and
conf
ers
a na
tionw
ide
right
of p
riorit
yTh
e ap
plic
ant m
ust h
ave
a bo
na fi
de in
tent
to
use
the
mar
k in
com
mer
ceTh
e ap
plic
atio
n m
ust b
e fo
llow
ed b
y us
e in
co
mm
erce
, unl
ess
regi
stra
tion
is b
ased
on
a fo
reig
n or
Inte
rnat
iona
l Reg
istra
tion
133
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
18
Cre
atio
n of
Tra
dem
ark
Rig
hts
Rig
hts
base
d on
an
inte
nt-to
-use
app
licat
ion
cann
ot b
e en
forc
ed u
ntil
the
mar
k is
re
gist
ered
, exc
ept t
o bl
ock
or o
ppos
e re
gist
ratio
n of
a la
ter-f
iled
mar
kR
ight
s ar
e ex
tingu
ishe
d if
the
appl
icat
ion
does
not
mat
ure
to re
gist
ratio
n, e
xcep
t tha
t an
y co
mm
on la
w u
se-b
ased
righ
ts w
ill re
mai
n
134
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
19
US
Rig
hts
Bas
ed O
n Fo
reig
n R
ight
s –
The
Paris
Con
vent
ion
Trad
emar
k rig
hts
(and
a re
gist
ratio
n) c
an b
e ac
quire
d w
ithou
t use
by
basi
ng a
US
ap
plic
atio
n on
a p
revi
ousl
y fil
ed fo
reig
n ap
plic
atio
n or
regi
stra
tion
unde
r Sec
tion
44 o
f th
e La
nham
Act
, whi
ch im
plem
ents
the
Par
is
Con
vent
ion
trade
mar
k tre
aty.
A fo
reig
n ap
plic
ant c
an b
ase
a U
.S.
appl
icat
ion
on a
pen
ding
app
licat
ion
in a
fo
reig
n co
untry
, pro
vide
d th
e U
.S. a
pplic
atio
n is
file
d w
ithin
six
mon
ths
of th
e fil
ing
of th
e fo
reig
n ap
plic
atio
n.
135
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
20
US
Rig
hts
Bas
ed O
n Fo
reig
n R
ight
s –
The
Paris
Con
vent
ion
The
fore
ign
filin
g da
te b
ecom
es th
e ef
fect
ive
U.S
. filin
g da
te, r
athe
r tha
n th
e ac
tual
, lat
er
U.S
. fili
ng d
ate.
An
appl
icat
ion
can
also
be
base
d on
a fo
reig
n re
gist
ratio
n th
at h
as a
lread
y is
sued
.In
bot
h ca
ses,
the
appl
icat
ion
mus
t alle
ge a
bo
na fi
de in
tent
to u
se th
e m
ark
in th
e U
.S.,
how
ever
, no
use
of th
e m
ark
in th
e U
.S. i
s ne
cess
ary
in o
rder
for t
he a
pplic
atio
n to
m
atur
e in
to a
regi
stra
tion
(alth
ough
it w
ill b
e vu
lner
able
to la
ter a
ttack
on
grou
nds
of
aban
donm
ent a
nd/o
r non
use)
.
136
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
21
US
Rig
hts
Bas
ed O
n Fo
reig
n R
ight
s –
The
Mad
rid P
roto
col
U.S
. tra
dem
ark
right
s ca
n al
so b
e ac
quire
d ba
sed
on a
n In
tern
atio
nal R
egis
tratio
n pu
rsua
nt to
the
Mad
rid P
roto
col,
unde
r S
ectio
n 66
of t
he L
anha
m A
ct.
A fo
reig
n ap
plic
ant c
an u
tiliz
e th
e M
adrid
P
roto
col i
n th
e U
nite
d S
tate
s if
the
appl
ican
t is
dom
icile
d in
a c
ount
ry w
hich
is a
mem
ber
of th
e P
roto
col.
137
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
22
Det
erm
inin
g Pr
iorit
y
In g
ener
al, t
he fi
rst t
o fil
e a
fede
ral t
rade
mar
k ap
plic
atio
n in
goo
d fa
ith a
chie
ves
natio
nwid
e pr
iorit
y ov
er a
ll ex
cept
a p
rior u
ser i
n its
re
gion
of u
se a
nd a
ntic
ipat
ed re
gion
of
expa
nsio
n.A
filin
g ba
sed
sole
ly o
n an
inte
nt to
use
mus
t be
perfe
cted
via
use
and
regi
stra
tion
to m
aint
ain
and
enfo
rce
the
prio
rity
right
s.If
neith
er p
arty
has
file
d, a
nd b
oth
rely
upo
n th
e co
mm
on la
w, t
hen
ther
e w
ill be
a c
ompa
rison
of t
he
date
s of
firs
t use
.
138
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
23
Det
erm
inin
g Pr
iorit
y
A fi
ling
base
d on
a p
endi
ng fo
reig
n ap
plic
atio
n un
der t
he P
aris
Con
vent
ion,
or o
n a
com
bina
tion
of th
e P
aris
Con
vent
ion
and
the
Mad
rid P
roto
col,
may
ach
ieve
a p
riorit
yda
te u
p to
six
mon
ths
earli
er th
an th
e ac
tual
U
.S. f
iling
date
. If
the
hom
e co
untry
or b
asic
ap
plic
atio
n m
atur
es in
to a
regi
stra
tion,
the
appl
ican
t doe
s no
tnee
d to
use
the
mar
k in
th
e U
.S. i
n or
der t
o ob
tain
a U
.S. r
egis
tratio
n.
139
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
24
Det
erm
inin
g Pr
iorit
y
Eve
n if
the
fore
ign
appl
icat
ion
does
not
m
atur
e in
to a
regi
stra
tion,
if th
e ap
plic
ant
asse
rts a
n ad
ditio
nal b
asis
for r
egis
tratio
n,
such
as
inte
nt-to
-use
in th
e U
.S.,
and
fulfi
lls
that
bas
is, t
he a
pplic
ant c
an d
rop
the
fore
ign
basi
s fo
r the
app
licat
ion
and
the
regi
stra
tion
will
issu
e w
ith th
e pr
iorit
y fil
ing
date
pr
eser
ved.
140
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
25
Det
erm
inin
g Pr
iorit
y
Exa
mpl
e I:
Com
pany
X fi
les
for a
mar
k on
Ja
nuar
y 1,
201
6, b
ased
on
inte
nt to
use
. C
ompa
ny Y
beg
ins
usin
g a
conf
usin
gly
sim
ilar m
ark
on F
ebru
ary
1, 2
016.
Com
pany
X
then
beg
ins
usin
g its
mar
k on
Mar
ch 1
, 20
16.
Who
has
prio
rity?
141
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
26
Det
erm
inin
g Pr
iorit
y
Com
pany
X.
How
ever
, if,
for s
ome
reas
on, X
can
not p
erfe
ct it
s pr
iorit
y da
te
by g
ettin
g a
regi
stra
tion,
then
Y w
ill
prev
ail,
beca
use
it ha
s pr
ior u
se.
142
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
27
Det
erm
inin
g Pr
iorit
y
Exa
mpl
e II:
Com
pany
X b
egin
s us
ing
a m
ark
on J
anua
ry 1
, 201
6, a
nd fi
les
an a
pplic
atio
n th
e sa
me
day.
Com
pany
Y, a
n Ita
lian
com
pany
, file
s an
app
licat
ion
for a
co
nfus
ingl
y si
mila
r mar
k on
Feb
ruar
y 1,
201
6,
base
d on
inte
nt to
use
, and
als
o ba
sed
on a
n ap
plic
atio
n fil
ed in
Ital
y on
Dec
embe
r 31,
20
15.
Com
pany
Y b
egin
s us
ing
its m
ark
on
Janu
ary
1, 2
016,
dro
ps it
s Ita
lian
appl
icat
ion
as a
bas
is fo
r U.S
. reg
istra
tion,
and
now
se
eks
a U
.S. r
egis
tratio
n ba
sed
sole
ly o
n us
e.
Who
has
prio
rity?
143
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
28
Det
erm
inin
g Pr
iorit
y
Com
pany
Y, b
y on
e da
y. T
he P
aris
C
onve
ntio
n af
ford
s Y
a c
onst
ruct
ive
U.S
. fil
ing
date
of D
ecem
ber 3
1, 2
015,
bas
ed o
n th
e Ita
lian
filin
g da
te.
Eve
n th
ough
Y
even
tual
ly d
ropp
ed th
e C
onve
ntio
n as
a b
asis
fo
r U.S
. reg
istra
tion,
the
prio
rity
date
sur
vive
s.S
erio
us im
plic
atio
ns w
hen
eval
uatin
g tra
dem
ark
clea
ranc
e se
arch
es
144
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
29
Trad
emar
k Pr
otec
tion
Und
er S
tate
Law
Com
mon
Law
Reg
istra
tion
145
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
30
Trad
emar
k Pr
otec
tion
in F
orei
gn C
ount
ries
Trad
emar
k rig
hts
are
terr
itoria
lN
o si
ngle
inte
rnat
iona
l pro
tect
ion
or
regi
stra
tion
syst
emE
ach
syst
em h
as it
s ow
n la
ws
and
regi
stra
tion
syst
emIn
mos
t cou
ntrie
s, u
nlik
e th
e U
.S.,
right
s ar
e he
avily
dep
ende
nt u
pon
regi
stra
tion,
and
use
pr
ior t
o re
gist
ratio
n is
not
requ
ired
146
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
31
Trad
emar
k Pr
otec
tion
in F
orei
gn C
ount
ries
Par
is C
onve
ntio
nM
adrid
Pro
toco
l, M
adrid
Agr
eem
ent
Eur
opea
n U
nion
“EU
TM” s
yste
m
147
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
32
Ben
efits
of F
eder
al R
egis
trat
ion
Nat
ionw
ide
right
of p
riorit
y as
of t
he
appl
icat
ion
filin
g da
teC
onst
ruct
ive
notic
e of
trad
emar
k rig
hts
as o
f th
e re
gist
ratio
n da
teR
egis
tratio
n ce
rtific
ate
is e
vide
nce
of th
e re
gist
rant
’s ri
ghts
Inco
ntes
tabi
lity
148
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
33
Ben
efits
of F
eder
al R
egis
trat
ion
Use
of t
he “®
” sym
bol
Blo
cks
impo
rtatio
n of
goo
ds b
earin
g in
fring
ing/
coun
terfe
it tra
dem
arks
via
re
cord
atio
n w
ith th
e U
.S. C
usto
ms
Ser
vice
Bas
is fo
r for
eign
regi
stra
tion
unde
r the
Par
is
Con
vent
ion
and
the
Mad
rid P
roto
col
149
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
34
Stre
ngth
of M
arks
:Th
e Sp
ectr
um o
f Dis
tinct
iven
ess
Coi
ned
or fa
ncifu
l mar
ksA
rbitr
ary
mar
ksS
ugge
stiv
e m
arks
Des
crip
tive
mar
ksC
an b
e pr
otec
ted
upon
acq
uisi
tion
of d
istin
ctiv
enes
s
Gen
eric
term
s
150
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
35
Stre
ngth
of M
arks
:Th
e Sp
ectr
um o
f Dis
tinct
iven
ess
Acq
uisi
tion
of d
istin
ctiv
enes
s (“
seco
ndar
y m
eani
ng”)
for d
escr
iptiv
e m
arks
via
use
and
pr
omot
ion
Pre
sum
ptio
n of
dis
tinct
iven
ess
if us
ed s
ubst
antia
lly
excl
usiv
ely
and
cont
inuo
usly
for f
ive
year
s -L
anha
m A
ct
Sec
tion
2(f)
Dis
tinct
iven
ess
can
be a
cqui
red
earli
er in
cer
tain
cas
esD
ecla
ratio
ns a
s to
use
, pro
mot
ion,
adv
ertis
ing,
sal
es, w
ebsi
te
hits
, etc
.C
onsu
mer
dec
lara
tions
Rec
ogni
tion
in p
ress
Abi
lity
to d
ate
the
acqu
isiti
on o
f dis
tinct
iven
ess
can
be
criti
cal i
n pr
iorit
y ba
ttles
Rig
hts
may
be
geog
raph
ical
ly li
mite
d if
only
com
mon
la
w-b
ased
151
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
36
Prod
uct C
onfig
urat
ions
and
Tra
de D
ress
Mus
t be
dist
inct
ive
and
nonf
unct
iona
lA
des
ign
feat
ure
is fu
nctio
nal i
f it h
as a
util
itaria
n pu
rpos
e,
i.e.,
a pu
rpos
e ot
her t
han
to id
entif
y th
e so
urce
of th
e ite
m.
Und
er tw
o ke
y S
upre
me
Cou
rt ca
ses
in th
is a
rea,
i f th
e tra
de d
ress
is th
e co
nfig
urat
ion
of th
e pr
oduc
t its
elf:
The
clai
man
t mus
t sho
w th
at is
has
acq
uire
ddi
stin
ctiv
enes
s.
It ca
nnot
be
cons
ider
ed in
here
ntly
dist
inct
ive.
If th
e de
sign
feat
ure
was
onc
e th
e su
bjec
t of a
util
ity p
aten
t, th
ere
will
be
a st
rong
pre
sum
ptio
n th
at th
e fe
atur
e is
func
tiona
l an
d no
t pro
tect
able
trad
e dr
ess.
152
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
37
Spec
ial T
rade
mar
k Sp
ecie
s
Col
ors
Sou
nds
Sce
nts
Inte
rnet
Dom
ain
Nam
esP
rone
to in
fring
emen
t pro
blem
s be
caus
e na
mes
co
nfus
ingl
y si
mila
r to
trade
mar
ks a
re n
ot a
utom
atic
ally
bl
ocke
dP
robl
em is
like
ly to
be
exac
erba
ted
due
to n
ewly
in
trodu
ced
gTLD
s
153
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
38
154
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
39
155
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
40
156
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
41
157
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
42
158
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
43
159
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
44
160
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
45
161
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
46
162
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
47
163
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
48
Trad
emar
k C
onfli
cts
Infri
ngem
ent o
ccur
s w
hen
som
eone
use
s a
nam
e or
mar
k w
hich
is s
o si
mila
r to
the
trade
mar
k of
a s
enio
r tra
dem
ark
owne
r for
re
late
d go
ods
so a
s to
cau
se a
like
lihoo
d of
con
fusi
on, m
ista
ke o
r dec
eptio
n as
to
the
sour
ce o
f goo
ds o
r ser
vice
s
164
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
49
Trad
emar
k C
onfli
cts
Act
iona
ble
in:
The
U.S
. Pat
ent a
nd T
rade
mar
k O
ffice
The
Cou
rtsA
DR Fo
r int
erne
t dom
ain
nam
es:
The
Uni
form
Dom
ain
Nam
e D
ispu
te
Res
olut
ion
Pol
icy
(UD
RP
) of t
he In
tern
et C
orpo
ratio
n fo
r A
ssig
ned
Nam
es a
nd N
umbe
rs (I
CA
NN
)
165
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
50
Trad
emar
k C
onfli
cts
Sim
ilarit
y of
Mar
ksS
treng
th o
f Mar
ksR
elat
edne
ss o
f Goo
ds o
r Ser
vice
sC
hann
els
of T
rade
Like
lihoo
d of
Con
fusi
on F
acto
rs
166
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
51
Trad
emar
k C
onfli
cts
Type
of C
onsu
mer
sC
ost o
f Goo
ds o
r Ser
vice
sIn
tent
Act
ual C
onfu
sion
Like
lihoo
d of
Con
fusi
on F
acto
rs
167
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
52
Dilu
tion
of fa
mou
s m
arks
is a
ctio
nabl
e
Fam
ous
trade
mar
ks a
re p
rote
cted
from
dilu
tion
(wea
keni
ng) u
nder
Sec
tion
43(c
) of t
he L
anha
m A
ct
(this
sec
tion
was
sub
stan
tially
ove
rhau
led
in O
ctob
er,
2006
)Th
e m
eani
ng o
f “di
lutio
n:”
Dilu
tion
by b
lurr
ing
Dilu
tion
by ta
rnis
hmen
tR
elie
f is
avai
labl
e if
ther
e is
a li
kelih
ood
of d
ilutio
n of
th
e pl
aint
iff’s
mar
kA
like
lihoo
d of
con
fusi
onne
ed n
ot b
e sh
own
168
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
53
Dilu
tion
of fa
mou
s m
arks
is a
ctio
nabl
e
The
mar
k m
ust b
e “fa
mou
s” to
qua
lify
“Fam
e” m
eans
“wid
ely
reco
gniz
ed b
y th
e ge
nera
l co
nsum
ing
publ
ic o
f the
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
as a
des
igna
tion
of s
ourc
e of
the
good
s or
ser
vice
s of
the
mar
k’s
owne
r”Fa
ctor
s fo
r det
erm
inin
g “fa
me”
are
list
ed in
the
stat
ute
Fede
ral r
egis
tratio
n no
t req
uire
d (b
ut h
elpf
ul)
169
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
54
170
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
55
171
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
56
172
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
57
173
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
58
174
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
59
Dilu
tion
of fa
mou
s m
arks
is a
ctio
nabl
e
Inju
nctiv
e re
lief a
vaila
ble;
dam
ages
ava
ilabl
e on
ly if
will
fuln
ess
is p
rove
dU
SP
TO w
ill d
eny
or c
ance
l reg
istra
tion
of a
m
ark
likel
y to
cau
se d
ilutio
n of
a fa
mou
s m
ark
upon
suc
cess
ful c
halle
nge
by th
e ow
ner o
f the
fam
ous
mar
k in
an
oppo
sitio
n or
can
cella
tion
proc
eedi
ng.
Fair
use,
use
in n
ews
repo
rting
or
com
men
tary
, and
non
com
mer
cial
use
of a
fa
mou
s m
ark
are
not a
ctio
nabl
e
175
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
60
Dilu
tion
of fa
mou
s m
arks
is a
ctio
nabl
e
Sta
te d
ilutio
n st
atut
esA
vaila
ble
in a
ppro
xim
atel
y 38
sta
tes
Sta
te re
gist
ratio
n us
ually
not
requ
ired
Dis
tinct
iven
ess
usua
lly re
quire
d, b
ut “f
ame”
requ
ired
in
only
abo
ut 1
2 st
ates
176
© Practising Law Institute
Fund
amen
tals
of Tr
adem
ark L
aw in
the G
loba
l Mar
ketp
lace
61
Loss
of T
rade
mar
k R
ight
s
Dur
atio
n of
righ
tsA
band
onm
ent
Failu
re to
pro
secu
te in
fring
ers
Lice
nsin
g w
ithou
t qua
lity
cont
rol
Gen
eric
ide
e.g.
, AS
PIR
IN (B
ayer
AG
), E
SC
ALA
TOR
(Otis
E
leva
tor),
TH
ER
MO
S (T
herm
os G
mbH
), Y
O-Y
O
(Dun
can
Yo-
Yo)
, and
oth
ers.
177
© Practising Law Institute
NOTES
178