Functional Neuroanatomy & Neurological Bases of Cognition Nigel Schofield, Consultant Clinical...
-
Upload
ethan-reed -
Category
Documents
-
view
228 -
download
0
Transcript of Functional Neuroanatomy & Neurological Bases of Cognition Nigel Schofield, Consultant Clinical...
Functional Neuroanatomy & Neurological Bases of Cognition
Nigel Schofield, Consultant Clinical Neuropsychologist May 2008
Evolutionary Development
• If you examine the brain in an evolutionary perspective, this can help to understand the interlinks between form and function. The brain can be divided anatomically and functionally into three basic components.
Reptilian Brain
• Corresponds to the brainstem• Consists of the medulla, pons,
midbrain and basal ganglia• Not only responsible for vegetative
functions but also for many volitional behaviours directed towards individual preservation and propagation such as feeding, drinking and sexual aggression.
Paleomammalian Brain
• The primitive cortex of the limbic lobe
• Subserves primitive (but distinctly mammalian behaviours) such as hoarding and parental care of offspring.
Neomammalian Brain
• The neocortex
• Subserves higher cognitive functioning and speech which facilitate social behaviour.
Lurias Work
• Simple anatomical localisation of function does not explain cognitive and behavioural complexity.
• Postulated three functional units
Luria’s 3 Functional Units
• Motor unit – regulates motor tone
• Sensory unit – receives, processes and stores sensory information
• The unit for programming, regulating and verifying action
How do the units work?
• Progression from sensation through to symbolic function in each unit
• Primary, secondary and tertiary areas
e.g. Damage to the Visual Parts of the Sensory Unit
• Primary areas – losses of parts of the visual field
• Secondary areas – may lead to poor judgement of motion, poor distance judgement, impaired colour perception
• Tertiary areas – could lead to visual object agnosia
e.g. Damage in the Speech Pathways of the Motor Unit
• Primary areas – dysarthria
• Secondary areas – dysphasia
• Tertiary areas – poor speech spontaneity
Weaknesses of Luria’s Model
Does not fully explain the integration of focal brain functions because:-
• Divisions between sensory and motor neurons sometimes not clear
• Some functions exist several in anatomically distinct areas of the brain
• There are multiple parallel functions in the brain, not simple stepwise processes
Arousal, Attention, ActivationArousal, Attention, Activation
Arousal
Major Areas of Cognition
• Attention and concentration
• Perception
• Memory
• Language
• Control of motor behaviour
• Executive function
Attention and Concentration
Three attentional networks:-• Alerting – achieving and maintaining an alert
state in preparation for incoming stimuli• Orienting – selectively focusing on one or more
items out of many candidate ones• Executive control – monitoring and resolving
conflicts in planning, error detection and overcoming habitual actions
• All dependent on the brain being “aroused”
Localisation of Attentional Networks
• Alerting – frontal and parietal cortical regions particularly of the right hemisphere
• Orienting – parts of the superior and inferior parietal lobe, frontal eye fields and subcortical areas such as superior colliculus of the midbrain, and pulvinar and reticulate nucleus of the thalamus
• Executive control – includes midline frontal areas(especially anterior cingulate and lateral prefrontal cortex) and the basal ganglia
3 Compartments of Attention
Top-down modulation from prefrontal, parietal & limbic cortices
Bottom-up modulation from ascendingreticular activating system
Modality & domain specific attentionalmodulations ( sounds, tactile stimuli,
colours, motion, words, spatial targets,faces, objects, memories etc.)
Components of the ARAS• Reticulothalamic cortical pathway – promotes and
maintains cortical arousal by facilitating transthalamic passage of sensory material towards the cortex.
• Transmitter specific pathways originating in the brainstem or basal forebrain, and projecting to the cerebral cortex – include dopaminergic projections from the raphe nucleus & noradrenergic projections from the locus coeruleus of the brainstem, and cholinergic & gabaminergic pathways originating in the nucelus basalis.
Limbic elements of attention• Anterior cingulate cortex plays a core pivotal
role in attention – bilateral damage gives rise to akinetic mutism
• Intralaminar nuclei of the thalamus receive inputs from the brainstem nuclei and relay info widely to the cortex, with a reciprocal feedback loop from the cortex modulating these ascending pathways via the thalamus
Cortical elements of attention
• Parietal cortex involved in sustained and selective attention
• Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has a key role in divided attention
Perception
How we take energy from
the environment & convert it into
a representation that the mind
can use
Perceptual Problems• Visual field cuts• Cortical blindness• Achromatopsia – inability to discriminate
between colours (medial occipito-temporal)• Hemianaesthesia• Hemineglect – ? an attentional problem• Hemispatial neglect • Hemiakinesia• Agnosias• Loss of taste and/ or smell
Types of Agnosia
• Visual agnosias – inability to recognise familiar objects e.g.– Prosopagnosia – inability to recognise faces– Agnostic alexia – inability to read– Colour agnosia – inability to retrieve colour
information e.g. what colour are bananas– Object agnosia – inability to name objects– Simultiagnosia – inability to recognise a whole
image although individual details are recognised
• Auditory agnosia – an inability to recognise auditory stimuli
- Auditory/verbal information agnosia – an
inability to hear words- Auditory agnosia – inability to hear
environmental sounds e.g. car starting or dog barking
- Receptive amusia – inability to hear music• Somatosensory agnosia (Astereognosis or tactile
agnosia)
- Difficulty perceiving objects by touch
Object recog, understanding & namingFunctions Object Consequence of impairment
Discrimination of Apperceptual agnosia
shape, colour, location
Perceptual classification Associative agnosia
(modality specific)
Knowledge of objects Associative agnosia
(non-modality specific)
Store of names Anomia & paraphasias
Spoken name
Visual analysis
Object recog.
Semantic system
Lexicon
Apperceptive vs Associative Agnosia
Basic High-level Naming Semantic
visual perceptual & knowledge
proc analysis identific.
Apperc. / x x /
Assoc. / / x x /
Prosopagnosia Face
Voice, gait etc.
Spoken name
Visual analysis
Expression, lip reading,Feature matching
Face-recognition units****
Semantic systemKnowledge of person
Lexicon of names
Topographical Disorientation
• Egocentric disorientation – an inability to represent the location of objects relative to self (often seen in conjunction with features of Balints syndrome – due to bilateral posterior parietal damage
• Landmark agnosia – an inability to recognise salient environmental stimuli (buildings etc) – a form of associative agnosia due to lingual gyrus (basal occipital) damage
• Anterograde spatial disorientation – an inability to create “new maps” or representaions of the environment – due to damage to the right parahippocampal gyrus
Memory Taxonomy
CorticalNetworkMemory
Basic Neuroanatomy of MemoryA) Subcortical structures• Basal ganglia and cerebellum – Procedural
memory. Caudate nucleus involved particularly with habit formation (unconscious learning)
• Thalamus – Temporal sequencing information. Also supplementary role to medial temporal lobes in new learning
• Basal forebrain – The binding together of different modal components in episodic memory
B. Cortical structures• Hippocampus – Acquisition of new factual
knowledge• Primary association cortex – Visual, auditory and
somatosensory data• Non-medial temporal – Retrieval of previously
learned material e.g. autobiographical info, names, faces
• Ventromedial frontal lobes – Memory traces linking facts and emotion
• Dorsolateral frontal lobes – Recency and frequency memory. Working memory
Limbic System Elements of Episodic Memory
Frontal Lobe Retrosplenial Cortex
ThalamusAnterior mediodorsal
Mamillary bodyBasal forebrain
AmygdalaHippocampus
Entorhinal cortex
Cingulate cortex
Fornix
Pre-motor cortex Sensorimotor cortex
Perisylvian cortex
Occipeto-temporal parietal junction Middle temporal gyrus Anterior temporal cortex
Posterior ventral occipetal Posterior temporal/inferior temporal cortex parietal cortex
Action Touch
Sound
Words
Motion
Colour
Shape
SemanticRepresentation
Semantic Memory
Language Areas of the Brain
Language Functions• Phonology – production & comprehension of
appropriately sequenced speech sounds (phonemes) – left superior temporal lobe and anterior insula
• Semantics –Assignment of meaning to words and production of linguistically appropriate individual words – Anterior and inferior temporal lobe (semantic representations) and Wernicke’s area (mapping sound to underlying representations)
• Syntax – Assembly of strings of words into sentences using pronouns, prepositions, tenses etc. – Broca’s area
• Prosody – Fine tuning by intonation, cadence etc – Left anterior hemisphere and basal ganglia & Emotional expression – Right hemisphere
Characteristics of Different Types of Aphasia
Type Fluent Repetition Comprehension Naming Right-sided Sensory
hemiplegia deficits
Broca no poor good poor yes few
Wernicke yes poor poor poor no some
Conduction yes poor good poor no some
Global no poor poor poor yes yes
Transcortical yes good poor poor some yes
sensory
Transcortical no good good poor some no
motor
Transcortical no good poor poor some yes
mixed
Anomia yes good good poor no no
Disorders of Reading• Peripheral dyslexias - Preserved oral and written
spelling, and ability to identify words spelt out aloud coupled with
(a) ability to write, but unable to read other than letter by letter (alexia without agraphia) – left medial occipital lobe
(b) errors reading left-hand or initial parts of words (neglect dyslexia) – Right hemisphere lesions
• Central linguistic dyslexias – linguistically based, invariably affect oral spelling
(a) Breakdown of whole word (lexical) reading, difficulty with irregularly spelt words, phonologically plausible errors (surface dyslexia) – left tempero-parietal damage
(b) Loss of sound-based (phonological) reading, semantic errors, difficulty with function and abstract words, inability to read non-words (deep dyslexia) – extensive left hemisphere damage
Disorders of Spelling• Dyspraxic dysgraphia – oral spelling intact,
defective copying – dominant parietal or frontal lobe
• Neglect dyspraxia – wide left margin or mis-spelling of initial part of words. Other neglect phenomena usually also preseent – Right hemisphere lesions
• Lexical (surface) dysgraphia – breakdown of lexical route for spelling, so
• difficulty spelling irregular words, phonologically plausible errors – left tempero-parietal damage
• Deep dysgraphia – breakdown of sound route for spelling , so semantic errors, unable to spell unfamiliar or non-words, better concrete than abstract spelling – extensive left hemisphere damage
Control of Movement
Apraxia• Limb kinetic apraxia – breakdown of fine motor
organisation of finger movements, so find it hard to copy meaningless hand movements, mimic proper gestures or use real objects flawlessly – Basal ganglia damage, supplementary motor area damage
• Ideomotor apraxia – unable to carry out motor acts to command, but often can do so spontaneously. Difficulty with selection, sequencing, spatial orientation and movements in meaningless and meaningful gestures, and demonstrating imaginary use of objects dominant lobe. Perf. improves with imitation, and real object use - Inferior parietal and prefrontal damage. Callosal lesions can impair performance of one limb (usually the left)
• Ideational or conceptual apraxia – inability to carry out a complex sequence of co-ordinated movements even though each separate component of the sequence can be successfully performed. Inability to mime use of objects, or to even use the real objects. Thus possibly a disorder of semantic memory. – Left temporal lobe damage
• Orobuccal apraxia – difficulty performing learned, skilled movements of face, lips, tongue, cheeks, larynx and pharynx on command – Inferior frontal region and insula, so commonly seen in Broca’s aphasia patinets
Frontal Executive Function• Abstract conceptual ability• Set shifting/mental flexibility• Inhibitory control• Problem solving and strategy formulation• Planning• Self-monitoring• Initiation• Sequencing of behaviour• Decision making• Temporal-order judgements• Personality, esp. drive, motivation & inhibition• Social behaviour, incl. theory of mind
Important core functions
• Controlling acquisition of new memories• Divergent thinking – choosing different
ways of approaching a situation• Environmental control of behaviour –
using cues and information from the environment to direct, control or change personal behaviour.
• Directing interpersonal behaviour
Acquisition Deficits
• Impaired working memory
• Poor associative learning – difficulty associating varying facets of memory about facts or events, thus finding it hard to make use of external cues to direct behaviour
Divergent Thinking Deficits
• Loss of spontaneous behaviour – e.g. speaking and verbal fluency decreased; decreased ability to produce graphic designs or doodling; reduced behavioural output shown by lethargy, inability to initiate
• Impaired strategy formulation and planning, especially in response to novel situations
• Poor abstract thinking e.g. concept formation
Deficits in Environmental Control of Behaviour
• Ability to inhibit responses is impaired, so perseverative on tasks
• Breaking rules and taking risks
• Unable to follow instructions
• Gambling
• Poor error perception
• Amotivation and apathy
Impaired Interpersonal Behaviours
• Inappropriate social and sexual behaviour, or altered behaviours in comparison to premorbid patterns.
• Pseudodepression
• Pseudopsychopathy
Brains are not absolutely hard-wired – as shown by these fMRI images of regional activation in different people doing a Stroop task – some overlap of dorsolateral and medial frontal lobe, inferior parietal lobule and occipital cortex plus significant other variability. There are also gender differences that can account for better gender performance on different tasks e.g. on spatial working memory tasks men have more frontal and less occipital activation, women have the opposite.