FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

66
FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012

Transcript of FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Page 1: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

FSI

Lisa Guzzardo AsaroDr. Lisa Rivard

OCTOBER 2012

Page 2: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

THEMES for 2012-2013

• Data Collection, Analysis, Dialogue and Response

• Shared Leadership--Shared Ownership

• Shifting Culture to Collaborative Inquiry

• Implementation and Monitoring School Improvement Initiatives

• Assessing Impact

Page 3: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

FSI Materials

• New Participants, White Binder• New Participants, MI-CSI Journal• New Participants, Plastic Folders• All, Book Talk: got data? NOW WHAT• All Flashdrive• Macombfsi.net

Page 4: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Connector Activity #1Finding Common Ground

Task:• This activity will be done with your school team.• Find (3) things in common amongst you.• They CANNOT be things that are obvious…ex.

We are all Teachers• Be ready to share out with larger group.

Page 5: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Connector Activity #2Shoe-In

Mixer:• Find someone on the opposite side of the room as you, that is wearing

completely different style shoes.

• When you travel, take 3 sticky notes and a writing tool

• Introduce yourself and find a place to sit for the next task.

Movie and PopcornTask:View the 14 minute video

• Think about the following question and use your sticky notes to record important ideas.

What evidence can you site that students and teachers are working at an increased Depth of Knowledge (DOK)?

Page 7: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Connector Activity #2Movie and Popcorn Continued

Task:• Have a conversation with your

partner on notes taken.• Discuss the evidence you have

that students and teachers were working at an increased Depth of Knowledge.

• What structures do you see that are in place for these DOK to be accomplished?

• Be ready to “pop” up and share.

Page 8: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Today’s Outcomes

•Receive updates

•Explore the streamlined SI, ASSIST through AdvancED

•Check to see where you are with implementing the CCSS

•School-wide implementation and progress monitoring

•Explore 6 tools to navigate the SI process

•Decommissioned-ACT Data Analysis HS only

Page 9: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Today’s Roadmap

• Welcome• 2011 Themes and Updates• What has Changed• Due Dates and Professional Learning• Common Core State Standards• Monitoring the Impact of Strategy

Implementation• SI Progress Monitoring• Data 4 SS/Data Director/MISchooldata• Tool Tools and More Tools• Network and Planning

TAB TWELVE

Page 10: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Key Working Agreements A Facilitation Tool

• Respect all Points of View

• Be Present and Engaged

• Honor Time Agreements

• Get All Voices in the Room

These breathe life into our Core Values

Page 11: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Parking LotA Facilitation Tool

• Rest questions that do not benefit the whole group

• Place questions that do not pertain to content at this time

• Place questions that pertain, but participants do not want to ask at this time

Page 12: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

LIVING BELIEF STATEMENT

“Networking is not an option, but a critical part

of how Facilitators of School Improvement learn and share their

learning.”

Page 13: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement

Stages and Steps

DoImplement Plan

Monitor PlanEvaluate Plan

PlanDevelop Action

Plan

GatherGetting Ready

Collect School DataBuild School Profile

StudentAchievement

StudyAnalyze Data

Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives

Research Best Practice

(MI-CSI)

Page 14: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement

Stages and Steps

• Getting Ready• Collect School Data • Build School Profile

I. Diagnostics II. School Process Profile

• Analyze Data I. Diagnostic Analysis II. School Process Analysis III. Executive Summary/Goals and Plan

• Set Goals • Set Measurable Objectives• Research Best Practice

• Develop Action Plan

• Implement Plan• Monitor Plan• Evaluate Plan

Comprehensive Needs Assessment

School Improvement

Plan

Gather

Study

Plan

Do

Page 15: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Stage One GATHER Step 1: Getting Ready

4 Considerations

• School Culture– Collaborative Inquiry Process– Vision, Mission, Core Values and Belief

Statements• School Decision Making

– From Decide and Announce to Consensus• Team Building

– Stakeholder Analysis– Group vs. Team

• School Current Reality – ‘Where Are We?’

GATHERGetting Ready

Collect School DataBuild School Profile

Page 16: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Getting Ready, Data Collection/AnalysisImplement and Monitor SI PLAN

GATHER, STUDY, &DO 09.04.11 - 04.01.13

GATHERGetting Ready

Collect School DataBuild School Profile

STUDYAnalyze Data

Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives

Research Best Practice

DOImplement Plan

Monitor PlanEvaluate Plan

Page 17: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Document I (SDP/A)

School Data Profile/Analysis

Due Online: 09.01.13

Document III (Summary Report/Goals Management)

Summary Report/School Improvement Plan

Due Online: 09.01.13

Document II (SPP/A)

School Process Profile/Analysis

Due Online: 04.01.13

a. MDE: School Process Rubrics 90b. MDE: School Process Rubrics 40c. NCA: Self Assessment (SA) d. NCA: Self Assessment Inventory (SA)

NEW DYNAMIC and INTIATIVE SYSTEMTo INFORM our

School Improvement DECISIONS

Page 18: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Michigan School Improvement FrameworkStrand I Strand II Strand III Strand IV Strand V

Teaching for Learning Leadership

Personnel &Professional

Learning

School and Community Relations

Data and Information

Management

Standards (12) and Benchmarks (26)1. Curriculum

• Aligned, Reviewed & Monitored

• Communicated

2. Instruction• Planning• Delivery

3. Assessment• Aligned to

Curriculum and Instruction

• Data Reporting and Use

1.Instructional Leadership

Educational Program

· Instructional Support

2.Shared Leadership

• School Culture and Climate

• Continuous Improvement

3.Operational Resource Management

• Resource Allocation

• Operational management

1.Personnel Qualifications

•Requirements•Skills,

Knowledge, Dispositions

2.Professional Learning

• Collaboration• Content &

Pedagogy• Alignment

1.Parent/Family Involvement

• Communication• Engagement

2.Community Involvement

• Communication• Engagement

1.Data Management• Data

Generation, Identification & Collection

• Data Accessibility

• Data Support

2.Information Management

• Analysis & Interpretation

• Applications

Page 19: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

AdvancED Michigan5 Standards

STANDARD 3. Teaching and Assessing for Learning. The system’s curriculum, instructional design, and assessment practices guide and ensure teacher effectiveness and student learning across all grades and courses. (Continued on next page)

3.1The system’s curriculum provides equitable and challenging learning experiences that ensure all students have sufficient opportunities to develop learning, thinking, and life skills that lead to success at the next level.

3.2 Curriculum, instruction, and assessment throughout the system are monitored and adjusted systematically in response to data from multiple assessments of student learning and an examination of professional practice.

3.3 Teachers throughout the district engage students in their learning through instructional strategies that ensure achievement of learning expectations.

3.4 System and school leaders monitor and support the improvement of instructional practices of teachers to ensure student success.

3.5 The system operates as a collaborative learning organization through structures that support improved instruction and student learning at all levels.

Page 20: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

School Process Profile (SPP) document two

Two Road Mapswww.advanc-ed.org/mde

www.advanc-ed.org/assist

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT EDUCATION

MDEAdvancED Michigan

School Process Rubrics (SPR)

90 Rubrics

(Required in the 5th year of your cycle)

Self Assessment (SA)

56 Rubrics

(Required for the year of the ER)

EDYES! 40 Process Rubrics40 Rubrics

(Required Cycles 1-4)

Self Assessment Inventory (SAI)

56 Rubrics(Required Cycles 1-4)

External Review(ER)

Page 21: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Data and Data Analysis

AdvancED Michigan

DiagnosticStudent Performance DiagnosticStakeholder Feedback Diagnostic

(perception surveys)

External Review (ER) 5thYear

MDE

DiagnosticPerformance Diagnostic

The Student Diagnostic will be ‘live’ after the ER date has been assigned.

Page 22: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Executive SummaryComponents• Vision• Mission• Belief Statements• Strengths/Weaknesses• Complete every Year• Due 09.01.2013

Page 23: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Adaptive System School Improvement Support Tool

ASSIST

www.advanc-ed.org/mde moves to

www.advanc-ed.org/assist

Page 24: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Accessing ASSIST – Option 1

©2012 AdvancED24

www.advanc-ed.org/assist

Page 25: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

NEW ASSIST TABS

Page 26: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Accessing ASSIST – Option 2

©2012 AdvancED26

Log into the Management System and use one of the ASSIST links

Page 27: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

©2012 AdvancED27

ASSIST Overview

Appropriate task will be assigned to priority and focus school

Page 28: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

©2012 AdvancED28

ASSIST Overview

Click here to view the task details

Page 29: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

©2012 AdvancED29

These diagnostics are marked optional because only one is required, not both

Page 30: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.
Page 31: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.
Page 32: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

©2012 AdvancED32

Page 33: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

LABELING is EVERYTHING

Page 34: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

©2012 AdvancED34

Page 35: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.
Page 36: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

NoteworthyElementary

• Professional Learning Opportunities• MI School Data New Data Availability

Handout www.mischooldata.org• 12-13 Parent Involvement and Title I

– 02.11.13 MISD

• MI Professional Learning Standards

Page 37: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Noteworthy Secondary

• Professional Learning Opportunities• MI School Data New Data Availability Handout

www.mischooldata.org• 12-13 Parent Involvement and Title I

– 02.11.13 MISD

• ACT FREE online Prep• Student ACT Preparation Class

– 01.19.13 or 02.02.13

Page 38: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Explore, Plan, and ACTMiddle and High Schools

D-EXPLORE 7th Grade• 120 minutes

Explore 8th Grade • 120 minutes

D-PLAN 9th Grade• 120 minutes

PLAN 10th Grade• 120 minutes

Testing Window

03.04-22.13

Page 39: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Macomb County PLC Self Help Group

Facilitator: Dr. Rick Repicky

These meetings take place on the FOUR Tuesdays of the month at 10:00 am at the MISD. They are open to District and School Administrators and teachers.

DATES ROOM #

10.02.12 103 A/B

11.13.12 206

01.15.13 202

03.26.13 202

Page 40: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

AdvancED MI Fall Conference 11.08.12 Lansing Center, Lansing

MDE Fall Conference11.08.12 4:00-7:00 pm Lansing Center, Lansing

11.09.12 8:30 -4:00 pm Lansing Center, Lansing

Important DatesRegister at: www.gomiem.org

Page 41: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

REMINDER to REGISTERSchool Improvement Teams

Work Day

04.19.13 Title I only04.26.13 Title I only

04.30.13 Title I only

05.07.13 Non Title I05.08.13 Non Title I05.14.13 Non Title I05.15.13 Non Title I

Page 42: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Alternative Dates

• Make-up Days: must register• 02.01.13• 04.24.13

• SB-CEUs: 2.7 completed in MAY

Page 43: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.
Page 44: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.
Page 45: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.
Page 46: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Mathematics

Page 47: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Smarter Balanced Consortium

Have you SHIFTED to the Common Core?

Career and College

Readiness Standards Transition Guidance

2012

Page 48: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Common Core (Communicator)

Implementation Checklist for Principals

• Leadership, Awareness Building, and Communication

• Professional Learning

• Implications for Student Learning

• Capacity Building

• Special Considerations for Your School

Page 49: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

One Common Voice – One Plan

Michigan Continuous School ImprovementStages and Steps

DoImplement Plan

Monitor PlanEvaluate Plan

PlanDevelop Action Plan

GatherGetting Ready

Collect School DataBuild School Profile

StudentAchievement

StudyAnalyze Data

Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives

Research Best Practice

Page 50: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Stage Four: DOStep 9: Implement Plan

DOImplement Plan

Monitor PlanEvaluate Plan

Page 51: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Identifying ActivitiesIdentifying Activities MATRIX 1MATRIX 1

Connection to SPR 40/90, SA/Assist SA*

Getting Ready to Implement

Implement Monitoring Fidelity of Implementation and Impact

How will you address the targeted areas in your Summary Report (SPP)?

How will you ensure readiness for implementation?

How will you ensure that participants have the knowledge and skills to implement?

POSSIBILE ACTIVITIES Professional

development around strategy

Purchase materials Planning for

implementation – Identify schedule for strategy use, personnel, mechanism for monitoring, rollout, etc.

Communication vehicles

How will you ensure successful implementation for your selected activities?

POSSIBLE ACTIVITIES Communication – to whom?

How? Instructional technology* Activities to support at-risk

students (For Title One students)*

• Parent Involvement

*Required Components

How will you ensure the program/activity is implemented with fidelity?

How will you monitor the programs impact on student achievement?

POSSIBLE ACTIVITIES Walkthroughs PLC/CASL meetings Documentation of impact Demonstration classrooms Gathering achievement data

Page 52: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Grade Level or Content AreaStrategy Implementation MATRIX 2

Page 53: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Stage Four: DOStep 10: Monitor Plan

DOImplement Plan

Monitor PlanEvaluate Plan

Page 54: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

So…we’ve written a stellar school improvement plan…

Overarching Questions• How do we know we’re

implementing it?

• How do we know the strategy is impacting student achievement?

DoImplement Plan

Monitor PlanEvaluate Plan

Page 55: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

MONITOR MONITOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN

(Formative)

IS IT WORKING?

EVALUATEEVALUATE THE

IMPACT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

(Summative)

DID IT WORK?

ARE STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES

BEING IMPLEMENTED

WITH FIDELITY?

ARE WE COLLECTING &

USING STUDENT AND ADULT DATA

TO MODIFY & ADJUST ONGOING IMPLEMENTATIO?

DID WE IMPLEMENTTHE

PLAN/STRATEGIES CORRECTLY &

CONSISTENTLY?

IS WHAT WE ARE DOING WORKING?

ARE WE SHOWING EVIDENCE OF STUDENT

GROWTH?

WHAT INTERIM ADJUSTMENTS ARE

SUGGESTED BY IMPLEMENTATION

DATA? HOW MIGHT THESE ADJUSTMENTS

AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE

RESULTS?

DID WE GIVE IT ENOUGH TIME?

ENOUGH RESOURCES?

Implementation: Adult Focused Impact: Student Focused

MONITOR EVALUATE EVALUATEMONITOR

DID OUR STRATEGIES RESULT

IN INCREASED STUDENT

ACHIEVEMENT?

WHAT UNINTENDED

CONSEQUENCES (GOOD AND BAD) HAVE OCCURRED?

DoImplement Plan

Monitor PlanEvaluate Plan

Page 56: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

MONITORMONITOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN

(Formative)

IS IT WORKING?

EVALUATEEVALUATE THE IMPACT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

(Summative)DID IT WORK?

ARE STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES

BEING IMPLEMENTED

WITH FIDELITY?

ARE WE COLLECTING &

USING STUDENT AND ADULT DATA

TO MODIFY & ADJUST ONGOING IMPLEMENTATIO?

IS WHAT WE ARE DOING WORKING?

ARE WE SHOWING EVIDENCE OF STUDENT

GROWTH?

WHAT INTERIM ADJUSTMENTS ARE

SUGGESTED BY IMPLEMENTATION

DATA? HOW MIGHT THESE ADJUSTMENTS

AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE

RESULTS?

Implementation: Adult Focused Impact: Student Focused

MONITOR EVALUATE EVALUATEMONITOR

DoImplement Plan

Monitor PlanEvaluate Plan

Page 57: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Just Do IT!Just Do IT!

• Monitor ImplementationMonitor Implementation

• Evaluate ImplementationEvaluate Implementation

• Monitor ImpactMonitor Impact• Evaluate ImpactEvaluate Impact

Adult Focused

Student Focused

DoImplement Plan

Monitor PlanEvaluate Plan

Page 58: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Progress Monitoring

Anchor Bay Middle School NorthKris Deagan

Sarah [email protected]

Page 59: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Tools Tools Tools

• School Self Assessment of SI Planning Processes

• Protocols for Dialoging Text

• Developing Individual Learning Goals

• Culture of Trust/Collegial Visit

• Family and Community Partnership

• Systems and Collaboration Inventory

Page 60: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Directions

• Each participant reads about one tool

• Identify ways to use the TOOL to support SI initiatives

• ‘Use the SI Tools Use’ form to record

• Report out to hole group

• Meet in school teams to create a plan for use

Page 61: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Stage One: GATHERStep 1: Getting Ready

GATHERGetting Ready

Collect School DataBuild School Profile

Page 62: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

“In God we trust, everyone else brings DATA”

Page 63: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

One Common Voice – One Plan Stage One Gather: Step 2 Collect School Data

What do you already know?What data do you need to know?

What additional information/data do you need to know?Where can the information/data be found?

Definitions

AchievementStudent

Outcome Data

How our students perform on local, state and federal

assessments (subgroups)

Demographic or

Contextual Data

Describes our students, staff, building, and community

Process Data

The policies, procedures, and systems we have

in place that define how we do

business

Perception Data

 Opinions of

staff, parents, community and

students regarding our

school 

Page 64: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

What types of data are/are not readily available in your building?

64

Demographic Data Achievement/Outcome Data

Process Data Perception Data

•Enrollment•Subgroups of students•Staff•Attendance (Students and Staff)•Mobility•Graduation and Dropout•Conference Attendance•Education status•Student subgroups•Parent Involvement•Teaching Staff•Course enrollment patterns•Discipline referrals•Suspension rates•Alcohol‐tobacco‐drugs violations•Participation extra‐curriculars•Physical, mental, social and health

•Local assessments: District Common Assessments, Classroom Assessments, Report Cards•State assessments: MME, ACT, MEAP, MI-Access, MEAP Access, ELPA• Nationalassessments: ACT Plan, ACT Explore, ACT WorkKeys, NWEA, ITBS, CAT, MET NAEP, PSAT•GPA•Dropout rates•College acceptance

•Policies and procedures (e.g. grading, homework, attendance, discipline)•Academic and behavior expectations•Parent participation – PT conferences, PTO/PTA, volunteers•Suspension dataSchool Process Profile Rubrics(40 or 90) or SA/SAR (NCA)•Event occurred: Who, what, when,where, why, how•What you did forWhom: Eg. All 8th gradersreceived violencePrevention

•Survey data (student, parent, staff, community)•Opinions•Clarified what others think•People act based on what they believe•How do they see you/us?

Page 65: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Stage One: GatherStep 2: Collecting School DataStep 3: Build School Profile

Data DirectorD4SS

MISchooldata.org

Presenter Dr. Jennifer Parker-Moore

Personnel Skilled in Technology AssessmentThis is an annual survey.

Assessment window will open 10.21.12Technology Assessment due: December 2012

GATHERGetting Ready

Collect School DataBuild School Profile

Page 66: FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.

Stage Two: StudyStep 4: Analyze Data

Decommission ACTData Analysis

Presenter Tesha Thomas

STUDYAnalyze Data

Set GoalsSet Measurable Obj.

Research Best Practice