Frontal Sinus Fractures: Evaluation of CT Scans in 132 ... Sinus Fractures: Evaluation of CT Scans...

6
Frontal Sinus Fractures: Evaluation of CT Scans in 132 Patients Erik M. Olson, 1 Darin L. Wright , 1 Henry T. Hoffman , 2 David B. Hoyt , 3 .4 and Robert D. Tien 1 Purpose: To determine the frequency of detection of front al sinus fractures on initial CT scans of patients with intracranial injuries, and to characterize associated injuires. Methods: Th e initial head CT scans in 132 patient s with clinical or radiographic evidence of a frontal sinus fracture were retrospectively reviewed to further characterize the fracture . Additional radiographic studies and medi cal records were reviewed to determine associated injuries, th erapy, clinical outcome, and complications. Results: In 90 % (124) of the patients, the frontal si nu s fractu res were visualized on initial head CT scans· that were obtained to evaluate suspected intracranial injury . Complex fractures involving both the anterior and posterior wall of the si nus accounted for 65 % of cases (86 patients), whereas fractur es of the anterior wall only or posterior wall only occurred in 24 % (32) and 11 % (14) of patients, respectively . Significant intracranial hemorrhage occurred in over 90 % of patients with fractures involving the posterior wall. Conclusions: In general, f ractures that involved the posterior wall had more complications and a worse clinical outcome than fractures that only involved the anterior wall; nearly all frontal sinus fra ct ures can be detected on head CT studies in patients with intracranial injuries. Index terms: Sinus, computed tomography ; Sinus, frontal ; Head, trauma AJNR 13:897-902, May/ June 1992 Frontal sinus fractures account for 5% to 15 % of all facial fractures (1-5). Frontal sinus fractures are frequently first detected on the initial head computed tomography (CT) scan of trauma pa- ti ents being evaluated for suspected intracranial injury. The evaluation of frontal sinus fractures has previously received little attention in the ra- di ology literature; to our knowledge, no study has fully described their CT scan appearance and their associated injuries in a large series of pa- tients. This study was undertaken to determine how frequently frontal sinus fractures could be detected on the initial head CT scan, and to Received May 13, 1991 ; accepted and revision r eq uested August 14 ; revision received September 26. 1 University of California Sa n Diego Medical Center, Department of R ad iology, Sa n Diego, CA 92103. 2 University of Iowa Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Iowa Cit y, Iowa 52242. 3 University of Ca lifornia San Diego Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Tr auma, San Diego, CA 92103 and The Tr auma Research and Education Foundation, San Diego, CA. 4 Address reprint requests to David B. Hoy t, MD, Associate Professor of Surgery, UCSD Medical Center, Department of Surgery, 225 Dickinson Street, 8896 , Sa n Diego, CA 92103. AJNR 13:897- 902 , May / June 1992 0195-6108/ 92/ 1303-0897 ·9 American Society of Neuroradiology 897 characterize and define associated injuries and complications. Materials and Methods San Diego County trauma registry records of patients entering the trauma unit s at Univers ity of California San Diego Medi cal Center, Mercy Hospital and Medical Center, Palomar Medical Center, Scripps Memorial Hospital, and Sharp Memorial Hospital between January 1, 1985 and May 1, 1990 were reviewed to identify patients with a discharge diagnosis of frontal sinus fracture . Data collected for the trauma registry during the initial hospitalization included age, sex, mechanism of injury, associated injuri es , therapy , and immediate co mpli cations. The comp lete med- ical record of each patient was retrospectively rev iewed at the time of this study to co nfirm the trauma registry data and obtain clinical follow-up . Of the 204 patients with frontal sinus fractures re corded in the trauma registry, 132 patients were included in the study . Patients were only included in this study if the initial CT scans were available, and included 1 0-mm thick , con - tiguous slices with brain, bone, and subdur al window set- tings. Patients with missing or incomplete head CT scans were not includ ed in the study. The initial head CT scans of th ese 132 patients (obtained short ly after adm ission to evaluate suspected intracranial trauma) were retrosp ec- tively reviewed to determine if a frontal sinus fracture was imaged on the initial scan.

Transcript of Frontal Sinus Fractures: Evaluation of CT Scans in 132 ... Sinus Fractures: Evaluation of CT Scans...

Frontal Sinus Fractures: Evaluation of CT Scans in 132 Patients

Erik M. Olson , 1 Darin L. Wright, 1 Henry T. Hoffman,2 David B . Hoyt,3 .4 and Robert D. Tien 1

Purpose: To determine the frequency of detection of frontal sinus fractures on initial CT scans of

patients with intracranial injuries, and to characterize associated injuires. Methods: The initial head

CT scans in 132 patients with clinical or radiographic evidence of a frontal sinus fracture were

retrospectively reviewed to further characterize the fracture. Additional radiographic studies and

medical records were reviewed to determine associated injuries, therapy , clinical outcome, and

complications. Results: In 90% (124) of the patients, the frontal sinus fractures were visualized

on initial head CT scans· that were obtained to evaluate suspected intracranial injury. Complex

fractures involving both the anterior and posterior wall of the sinus accounted for 65% of cases

(86 patients), whereas fractures of the anterior wall only or posterior wall only occurred in 24%

(32) and 11 % (14) of patients, respectively . Significant intracranial hemorrhage occurred in over

90% of patients with fractures involving the posterior wall. Conclusions: In general , fractures that

involved the posterior wall had more complications and a worse clinical outcome than fractures

that only involved the anterior wall ; nearly all frontal sinus fractures can be detected on head CT

studies in patients with intracranial injuries.

Index terms: Sinus, computed tomography ; Sinus, frontal ; Head, trauma

AJNR 13:897-902, May/ June 1992

Frontal sinus fractures account for 5% to 15% of all facial fractures (1-5). Frontal sinus fractures are frequently first detected on the initial head computed tomography (CT) scan of trauma pa­tients being evaluated for suspected intracranial injury. The evaluation of frontal sinus fractures has previously received little attention in the ra­diology literature; to our knowledge, no study has fully described their CT scan appearance and their associated injuries in a large series of pa­tients. This study was undertaken to determine how frequently frontal sinus fractures could be detected on the initial head CT scan, and to

Received May 13, 1991 ; accepted and revision requested August 14; revision received September 26.

1 University of California San Diego Medical Center, Department of

Radiology, San Diego, CA 92103. 2 University of Iowa Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology ,

Iowa City , Iowa 52242. 3 University of California San Diego Medical Center, Department of

Surgery, Division of Trauma, San Diego, CA 92103 and The Trauma

Research and Education Foundation, San Diego, CA. 4 Address reprint requests to David B. Hoy t, MD, Assoc iate Professor

of Surgery, UCSD Medical Center, Department of Surgery , 225 Dickinson

Street, 8896, San Diego, CA 92103.

AJNR 13:897- 902, May/ June 1992 0195-6108/ 92/ 1303-0897 ·9 American Society of Neuroradiology

897

characterize and define associated injuries and complications.

Materials and Methods

San Diego County trauma registry records of patients entering the t rauma units at University of California San Diego Medical Center, Mercy Hospital and Medical Center, Palomar Medical Center, Scripps Memorial Hospita l, and Sharp Memorial Hospital between January 1, 1985 and May 1, 1990 were reviewed to identify patients with a discharge diagnosis of frontal sinus fracture. Data collected for the trauma registry during the initial hospitalization included age, sex, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, therapy , and immediate complications. The complete med­ical record of each patient was retrospectively reviewed at the time of this study to confirm the trauma registry data and obtain clinical follow-up.

Of the 204 patients with frontal sinus fractures recorded in the trauma registry, 132 patients were included in the study. Patients were only included in this study if the initial CT scans were available, and included 1 0-mm thick , con­tiguous slices with brain, bone, and subdural window set­tings. Patients with missing or incomplete head CT scans were not included in the study. The initial head CT scans of these 132 patients (obtained shortly after admission to evaluate suspected intracranial t rauma) were retrospec­tively reviewed to determine if a frontal sinus fracture was imaged on the initial scan.

898

CT scans were performed on either a GE 9800 or GE 8800 (General Electric Medical, Milwaukee, WI) , a Picker International 1200SX (Picker International, Cleveland, OH) or a Somaton (Siemens Medical Systems, Iselin, NJ) CT scanner. All scans were interpreted at the time the patient presented by at least one radiologist. At the time of this study, at least two of the authors reviewed the scans without knowledge of the initial interpretation. If these two interpretations of initial head CT scan differed , an additional radiologist reviewed the scan to arrive at a final interpre­tation.

After the final interpretation of the initial scan was determined, thin-cut facial CT scans, follow-up head CT scans, and plain radiographs of the face was retrospectively reviewed to further classify the frontal sinus fractures, determine additional facial and skull fractures, and evaluate soft-tissue injury to the brain and face. The frontal sinus fractures were characterized as anterior wall nondisplaced, anterior wall displaced, posterior wall nondisplaced, poste­rior wall displaced, or no fracture demonstrated. No attempt was made to evaluate the integrity of the nasofrontal duct. Additional facial and skull fractures, the presence of ab­normal soft-tissue or air-fluid levels within the paranasal sinuses, orbital hematomas, and intracranial hemorrhage, hematomas, and contusions were also recorded.

Results

The average age of the 132 patients was 32 years, with an age range of 14 to 83 years. There was a 9:1 male to female predominance, with fractures in 119 (90%) males and 13 (1 0%) fe­males. The majority ( 119, 90%) of fractures were the result of blunt trauma, with penetrating trauma accounting for 13 (10%). Motor vehicle accidents accounted for 84 (64%) cases. The second and third most frequent causes were falls from heights 16 (14%), and gunshot injuries 12 (9 % ). Miscellaneous blunt trauma, usually as­saults, accounted for 17 (13%) of the fractures. Each type of frontal sinus fracture had a similar distribution of etiologic mechanisms.

A frontal sinus fracture was detectable on the initial head CT scan in 124 (94%) patients. Of the eight (6 %) patients whose fractures were not detected on the initial scan, fractures were dis­covered in six patients on thin-slice axial and coronal facial CT scans performed to evaluate other facial injuries. Fractures in two of the pa­tients were discovered on physical examination but were not seen on the head CT scan. One was a small , minimally displaced , open anterior wall fracture and the other was a nondisplaced pos­terior wall fracture discovered incidently at cra­niotomy for evacuation of a hemorrhagic frontal lobe contusion.

AJNR: 13, May/ June 1992

Most of the patients, 86 (65 % ), had complex fractures involving both the anterior and the pos­terior wall. Fractures of the anterior wall only were present in 32 (24%) patients, while isolated posterior wall fractures were present in 14 ( 11 %) patients. Fractures were displaced for a distance greater than the width of the wall in 59% of the anterior wall fractures and 54% of the posterior wall fractures .

Figure 1 shows typical examples of displaced and nondisplaced fractures. Most (86%) of the posterior wall fractures were associated with either nasoethmoid or orbital roof fractures. Lin­ear fractures through the anterior and posterior wall without involvement of the floor or ethmoid air cells were uncommon, occurring in only four (3%) of the patients.

In general, the patients with frontal sinus frac­tures had significant associated facial or skull fractures or intracranial injury (Table 1). Abnor­mal soft-tissue findings within the sinuses, orbits, and brain parenchyma were also relatively com­mon (Table 2 , Fig. 2). Periorbital hematoma or intraorbital abnormalities (hematoma, gas, bone fragments, or foreign bodies) were seen in 36 (27 %) of the patients. Pneumocephalus was pres­ent in 4 7 (37% ), over one third of the patients. Frontal lobe contusion (43 %), frontal subdural hematoma (14%), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (7 %) were the most common intracranial abnor­malities (Table 3). Over 90% of the intracranial injuries were associated with fracture of the pos­terior wall of the frontal sinus. Of the 100 patients whose injuries involved the posterior wall, 73% had radiographic evidence of intracranial hemor­rhage or contusion. Although, the more severely comminuted or displaced fractures had a higher incidence of associated injuries, involvement of the posterior wall was the best predictor of as­sociated injuries.

Therapy was variable and often dependent on associated injuries. Observation alone was the treatment in 38 (29%) of the patients. Seventeen (13%) patients died from associated injuries be­fore receiving treatment. Surgical therapy, usu­ally a combination of sinus obliteration, elevation of bony fragments , or sinus cranialization, was performed in 59 (45%) cases. Eighteen (14%) patients were lost to follow-up before treatment could be completed.

Frontal sinus fractures frequently have signifi­cant complications. Because of the short duration of the study and the poor clinical follow-up , only the complications apparent during the initial hos-

AJNR: 13, May/ June 1992 899

Fig. 1. Frontal sinus fractures seen on initial head CT scans in three separate patients involved in automobile accidents. A, CT scan showing a displaced fracture of the anterior wall with the fragment (arrow) adjacent to the posterior wall and a large

overlying soft-tissue defect. B, A relatively subtle nondisplaced posterior wall fracture (arrows) is well shown on this initial head CT scan. C, CT scan demonstrating a minimally displaced anterior wall fracture on the right (arrow) and severely displaced anterior and

posterior wall fracture on the left (open arrows). Note the abnormal soft tissue within much of the frontal sinus.

TABLE 1: Frequency of associated fractures with frontal sinus

fractures

Fracture Site

Orbit

Nasoethmoid

Cranium

Maxillary sinus

Zygomatic arch

Sphenoid sinus

LeFort type

Frequency(%)

110 (83)

90 (68) 77 (58) 72 (54)

28 (21) 12 (9)

11 (8)

TABLE 2: Frequency of abnormal soft tissue findings associated with

frontal sinus fractures

Site

Ethmoid sinus

Frontal sinus

Maxillary sinus

Sphenoid sinus

Orbit (hematoma)

Frontal lobe (contusion)

Other brain injuries

Frequency(%)

122 (92)

120 (91) 62 (47)

51 (39)

54 (41) 57 (43)

31 (24)

pitalization were documented in this series. There were 15 ( 11%) cases of significant ocular com­plications, such as blindness, extraocular muscle disorders, or diplopia. Meningitis occurred in six (5%) patients. Persistent cerebrospinal fluid leaks,

requiring surgery for repair, occurred in three (2%) patients.

Discussion

The frontal sinuses, air-filled cavities within the frontal bone, arise as small invaginations from an anterior ethmoidal cell tract (6). These cells may belong to the uncinate process, middle meatus, or ethmoidal bullae, which accounts for the vari­ability in the drainage of the frontal sinus (7). The adult frontal sinus, a pyramid-shaped structure with its base inferior and apex superior, has a thick, strong anterior wall and a thin, relatively fragile posterior wall and floor. A boney septum separates the sinus into two asymmetric cavities, each with its own drainage system via a nasa­frontal duct into the anterior part of the middle meatus or the anterior portion of the ethmoid infundibulum (8-1 0). The ducts originate near the intrasinus septum in the anterior portion of the floor of the sinus. They run posteriorly and cau­dally, through the anterior ethmoidal air cells, into the meatus or infundibulum (7, 11 ).

Frontal sinus fractures have traditionally been characterized as anterior wall, posterior wall, or nasofrontal duct fractures (1, 5, 6, 9, 12). Some

900

Fig. 2 . An example of a frontal lobe hemorrhagic contusion compl icating a se­vere posterior wall frontal sinus fracture.

A, Initial head CT scan showing a non­displaced fracture through the anterior and posterior wall of the left frontal sinus (small arrows). There is also a fracture through the posterior wall of the right frontal sinus (large arrow) , which was subsequently shown to be comminuted and displaced on a facial CT scan (data not shown). There are also frac­tures through both sphenoid bones (open arrows) and through the lateral aspect of the left frontal bone (arrowhead).

8 , Follow-up head CT scan on the same patient demonstrates a huge left frontal lobe hematoma (arrows).

TABLE 3: Intracranial hemorrhage associated with frontal sinus fractures

No. of Percent with

Brain Injury Patients

Posterior Wall Fractures

Frontal lobe contusion 57 (43) 91 Frontal subdural hematoma 18 (14) 100

Temporal lobe contusion 9 (7) 100 Temporal subdural hematoma 4 (3) 100

Other contusion/ hematoma 3 (2) 100

Other subdural hematoma 3 (2) 100 Subarachnoid hematoma 10 (8) 80 Shear injury 6 (5) 67 Epidural hematoma 4 (3) 75 Intraventricular hematoma 4 (3) 75

authors include through-and-through fractures, involving both the anterior and posterior wall, as a separate category (9). The fractures are further categorized as linear or comminuted and de­pressed or nondepressed. High-resolution CT is the method of choice for defining and character­izing anterior and posterior wall fractures ( 13-18). Nasofrontal duct fractures can seldom be imaged directly even with high-resolution CT scans (11). However, fractures through the eth­moid air cells and the orbital roof are easy to visualize and have a high association with nasof­rontal duct involvement (11, 12, 19-23). In our series, posterior wall fractures that did not involve the ethmoid air cells or orbital roof were very uncommon. Extension of a fracture from the orbital roof into the posterior wall accounted for most of the fractures of the posterior wall that did not also involve the anterior wall.

Proper characterization of the fractures is es­sential for planning treatment. Nondisplaced frac­tures of the anterior wall require no treatment. Displaced anterior wall fractures require cosmetic

AJNR: 13, May/June 1992

elevation. Posterior wall fractures and fractures that may involve the nasofrontal duct usually require surgical exploration with repair of the fracture and duct, or obliteration or cranialization of the sinus (3- 6, 9). If the frontal sinus is func­tionally eliminated, involvement of the nasofron­tal duct is irrelevant, as the sinus will no longer produce secretions.

No large imaging study of frontal sinus frac­tures has been conducted since CT scanning has become the standard method of evaluating facial trauma. Associated facial fractures are common, but the exact frequency is not known (9). One series of 21 patients described facial fractures in 14 patients, usually nasoethmoid or LeFort frac­tures (24). In another series (25), nasoethmoidal, maxillary imd zygomatic, and mandibular frac­tures were reported in 64%, 25%, and 11% of patients, respectively, with frontal sinus fractures. The incidence of associated facial or skull frac­tures (94%) in our study was very high. This is due partly to improved detection with CT scan­ning and partly to a more seriously injured patient population. Orbital fractures, nasoethmoid frac­tures, and maxillary sinus fractures were the most common associated facial fractures. Interestingly, LeFort fractures were present in only 8% of the patients. Fractures of the posterior wall had the highest incidence of associated facial fractures. This high incidence is not surprising, as it has been shown that two to three times greater force is required to fracture the frontal sinus than any other facial bone (26). Accordingly, most (64%) of the fractures in this series were caused by high-speed motor vehicle accidents.

The strong forces required to fracture the fron­tal sinus also account for the extremely high incidence of associated brain injuries. The peste-

AJNR: 13, May/ June 1992

rior wall of the frontal sinus is the anteroinferior wall of the anterior cranial fossa. Over 70% of the patients with fractures of the posterior wall developed detectable brain contusion or hemor­rhage, and over 90% of the patients with serious brain injury had fractures involving the posterior wall (Fig. 2). The brain injury was not always apparent on the initial head CT scan. The high frequency of brain injury with posterior wall frac­tures suggests that patients with posterior wall fractures should have follow-up CT scans or MR scans to exclude brain injury if the initial CT scan of the brain is normal.

Frontal sinus fractures are frequently associ­ated with ocular complications. One study of 727 patients receiving formal ophthalmologic consul­tation for facial fractures revealed that 89% of the patients with frontal sinus fractures had as­sociated ocular injuries (27) . Although our study had a much different patient selection bias, which should have had a lower frequency of associated eye injuries, the incidence of ocular trauma was still high: 83% of patients had orbital fractures and 11 % had significant ocular complications. Most of these complications occurred in patients with severely comminuted fractures involving the posterior wall and floor of the frontal sinus.

The incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leaks and meningitis were similar but slightly lower than that reported in previous series (28, 29). No mucoceles were reported in our study; however, long-term follow-up was poor and posttraumatic mucoceles can take years to develop (30, 31). Twenty-seven percent of the patients either died or were lost to follow-up before evaluation and therapy could be completed.

Our study demonstrates that nearly all frontal sinus fractures can be detected on head CT scans obtained to evaluate intracranial injury. The pa­tients in this series were not randomly selected, but chosen from trauma unit registries, which biases the group toward more serious injuries. The 94% detection rate would likely be lower in less critically injured or randomly selected pa­tients. Even so, the detection rate on head CT scans is undoubtedly quite high. Detecting a fron­tal sinus fracture on an initial head CT scan may lead the patient, if hemodynamically and neuro­logically stable, to receive a thin-cut facial CT scan during initial evaluation without moving the

atient from the scanner. Frontal sinus fractures are relatively uncom­

mon but serious manifestations of facial trauma. igh-resolution, thin-slice axial and coronal facial

901

CT scans are required to define details of the fractures and associated injuries. All frontal sinus fractures , but particularly posterior wall fractures , have a : high incidence of associated facial frac­tures and intracranial hemorrhage and contusion.

Acknowledgment

We gratefully thank the Department of Surgery, UCSD Medica l Center and the Trauma Research and Education Foundation of San Diego for assistance in collecting the clinical material.

References

1. Calvert CA, Cairns H. Discussion on injuries of fronta l and ethmoidal

sin u se~. Proc R Soc Med 1942;35:805-8 1 0

2. Schultz RC. Frontal sinus and supraorbital fractures from vehicle

accidents. C/in P/ast Surg 1975;2:93-1 06

3. Luce EA. Frontal sinus fractures: guidelines to management. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;80:500- 51 0

4. Sm ith WW, Yanagisawa E. Paranasal sinus trauma: In: Blitzer A,

Lawson W, Friedman WH, eds. Surgery of the paranasa/ sinuses. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1985:299- 315

5. Helmy ES, Koh ML, Bays RA. Management of frontal sinus fractures:

review of the li tera ture and cl inical update. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho/1 990;69:137- 148

6. Ri tter F. The paranasa/ sinuses: anatomy and surgical technique. 2nd

ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1978:34

7. Terrer E, Weber W, Ruefinacht D, Poralin in B. Anatomy of the

ethmoid: CT , endoscopic , and macroscopic. AJNR 1985;6:77-84

8. O'Rahi)ly R. Nose and paranasal sinuses. In : Anatomy, a regional study of human structure. 4th ed. Gardner E, ed. Philadelphia:

Saunders, 1975:732-740

9. Donald PJ . Frontal sinus fractures. In : Cummings CW, ed. Otolaryn­gology-head and neck surgery. Vol 1. St. Louis: Mosby , 1986:901-

922

10. Graney DO. A natomy of the paranasal sinuses. In: Cum m ings CW,

ed. Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, Vol 1. St. Louis: Mosby,

1986:845- 850

11 . Harris L, Marano GD, McCorkle D. Nasofronta l duct: CT in fronta l

sinus trauma. Radiology 1987; 165:195- 198

12. Pollak K, Payne EE. Fractures of the fronta l sinus. Oto/aryngol C/in North Am 1976;9:5 17- 522

13. Rowe LD, Miller E, Brandl-Zawadzki M . Computed tomography in

maxi llofac ial trauma. Laryngoscope 1981;91:745- 757

14. Zikkha A. Computed tomography in facial trauma. Radiology 1982; 144:545-548

15. Gentry LR, Manor WF, Turski PA, Strother CM. High resolution CT

analysis of facial struts in trauma. I. Normal anatomy. AJR 1983; 140:523- 532

16. Gentry LR , Manor WF, T urski PA, Strother CM. High resolution CT

analysis of fac ial struts in trauma. II . Osseous and soft-tissue compli­

cations. AJR 1983; 140:533- 541

17. Kassel EE, Noyek AM , Cooper PW. CT in facia l trauma. J Otolaryngol 1983; 12:2- 15

18. Johnson DH. CT of maxi llofac ial trauma. Radio/ C/in North Am

1984;22:107- 118

19. Schenck NL, Rauchback E, Ogura JH. Fronta l sinus disease. II.

Development of the fronta l sinus model: occlusion of the nasofronta l

duct. Laryngoscope 1974 ;84: 1233- 1247

902

20. Hybels RL, Newman MH. Posterior table fractures of the fronta l sinus.

I. An experimenta l study . Lary ngoscope 1977 ;87:171-1 79

2 1. May M , Ogura JH, Schramm V. Nasofronta l duct in frontal sinus

fractures. A rch Otolary ngol 1970;92:523- 532

22. Stanley RB, Becker TS. Injuries of the nasofrontal orifices in frontal

sinus fractures. Lary ngoscope 1987;97:728-731

23. Newman MH, T ravis LW. Fron tal sinus fractures. Lary ngoscope

1973;83: 128 1- 1292

24. Levine SB, Weiser P, Gillen J . Evaluation and treatment of fron tal

sinus fractures. Oto/ary ngol Head Neck Surg 1986;95: 19- 22

25. Schul tz RC. Supraorbi ta l and glabellar fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg

1970;45:227-233

AJNR: 13, May/ June 1992

26. Nahum AM. The biomechanics of maxillofacial trauma. C/in P/ast

Surg 1975;2:59-64

27. Holt GR, Holt JE. Incidence of eye injuries in facial fractures: an

analysis of 727 cases. Oto/ary ngol Head Neck Surg 1983;9 1 :276-

279

28. Lewin W. Cerebrospina l fluid rhinorrhea in closed head injuries. Br J

Surg 1954;42: 1- 18

29. Frenckner P, Richter NG. Operative treatment of skull fractures

through the frontal sinus. A cta Otolary ngol 1960;51 :63-72

30. Evans C. Aetiology in treatment of frontoethmoid mucocele. J Lar­

y ngol Oto/1 981;95:36 1-375

3 1. Bordley JE, Bosley WR. Mucoceles of the frontal sinus: causes and

treatment. Ann Otol 1973;82:696-702