From temporal to static networks, and back
-
Upload
petter-holme -
Category
Spiritual
-
view
184 -
download
3
Transcript of From temporal to static networks, and back
Sociopatterns gallery
P H Y S I C A L P R O X I M I T Y
Prostitution
Sociopatterns conference
Hospital system
N = 16,730, L = 50,632, T = 6.0y
N = 113, L = 20,818, T = 59h
N = 159(8), L = 6,027(350), T = 7.3(1)h
N = 293,878, L = 64,625,283, T = 3,570dReality miningN = 63, L = 26,260, T = 8.6h
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION
N = 57,189, L = 444,162, T = 112.0d Bornholdt’s e-mail
Eckmann’s e-mail
N = 3,188, L = 115,684, T = 81.6d
Filmtipset forum
N = 7,084, L = 1,412,401, T = 8.61y
Filmtipset messages
Pussokram dating
N = 28,972, L = 529,890, T = 512.0d
QX datingN = 80,683, L = 4,337,203, T = 63.7d
N = 35,624, L = 472,496, T = 8.27y
Facebook wall posts
N = 293,878, L = 876,993, T = 1591d
GOOD REPRESENTATION:RANKING OF IMPORTANTVERTICES CONSERVED
FOR ALL PARAMETER VALUES:MEASURE AVG OUTBREAK SIZE WHEN SPREADING STARTS AT i
FOR ALL PARAMETER VALUES:MEASURE DEGREE OF iFOR ALL PARAMETER VALUES:MEASURE CORENESS OF i
degree 4
coreness 0
coreness 2
coreness 3
coreness 4
static importanceoptimal params.
dyna
mic
impo
rtan
ce
Spearmanrank correlationcoefficent =Quality ofrepresentation
E-mail 1
E-mail 2
Dating
Gallery
Conference
Prostitution
Results, Degree
Time-slice Ongoing Exponential-threshold Accumulated
E-mail 1
E-mail 2
Dating
Gallery
Conference
Prostitution
Time-slice Ongoing Exponential-threshold Accumulated
Results, Coreness
Time sliceTime sliceTime slice OngoingOngoingOngoing Expo. thresholdExpo. thresholdExpo. threshold Acc.
ρmax tstart tstop ρmax tstart tstop ρmax τ ΩΩ ρE-m!il 1 0.73 0 0.42 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.77 0.40 0.30 0.46E-m!il 2 0.91 0 0.25 0.91 0.20 0.20 0.93 1.0 0.26 0.88D!tin" 0.82 0 0.65 0.42 0.25 0.25 0.86 0.10 0.16 0.71G!ller# 0.77 0 0.72 0.53 0.39 0.39 0.87 0.70 0.71 0.76Conference 0.79 0 0.10 0.74 0.10 0.11 0.77 0.04 0.02 0.53Prostitution 0.71 0 0.77 0.30 0.60 0.60 0.72 0.04 0.20 0.49
Perform!nce & p!r!meter v!lues De"ree
P!r!meter dependence of perform!nce
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
00
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
!
tstart/ T
t sto
p/
T
Time slice
P!r!meter dependence of perform!nce
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
!
tstart/ T
t sto
p/
T
Concurrency
P!r!meter dependence of perform!nce
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
!
!
" /
T
Exponential threshold
STEP 5 Split the time series into segments proportional to the intervals and impose the contacts of the segments to the intervals.
(1,2)(2,3)(2,4)(2,5)(3,4)(3,5)(4,5)(5,6)
time
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.1 1µ
! max
0.50.05
Exponential threshold
Time-slice
Accumulated
Ongoing
(1,2)
(2,3)(2,4)(2,5)(3,4)(3,5)(4,5)(5,6)
time
time
(1,2)(2,3)(2,4)(2,5)(3,4)(3,5)(4,5)(5,6)
ON
GO
ING
LIN
K P
ICT
UR
E
time
(2,3)(2,4)(2,5)(3,4)(3,5)(4,5)(5,6)
(1,2)
(1,2)(2,3)(2,4)(2,5)(3,4)(3,5)(4,5)(5,6)
time
LIN
K T
UR
NO
VER
PIC
TU
RE
Compensate for the size bias on intervals because of finite
T0
t’
t
sampling time (t’ would only be recorded if it starts within [0,T–t’])
Compensate for the size bias on intervals because of finite
T0
t’
t
sampling time (t’ would only be recorded if it starts within [0,T–t’])
Compensate for the chance an interevent time t is active
0
tat the start of the sampling is proportional to t
Compensate for the size bias on intervals because of finite
T0
t’
t
sampling time (t’ would only be recorded if it starts within [0,T–t’])
Compensate for the chance an interevent time t is active
0
tat the start of the sampling is proportional to t
tiT–tii: ti!t
! / tiT–tii
!Sum up and normalize
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 500 1000 1500 2000time t (days)
predicted frominterevent timesend timesbeginning times
PROSTITUTION
P (t
)B
Dating 2
1
0
0.5
0.75
0.25
ࢥ
Dating 1
Forum
1
0
0.5
0.75
0.25
ࢥ
1
0
0.5
0.75
0.25
ࢥ
Prostitution
Hospital
1
0
0.5
0.75
0.25
ࢥ
1
0
0.5
0.75
0.25
ࢥ
E-mail 2
1
0
0.5
0.75
0.25
ࢥ
1
0
0.5
0.75
0.25
ࢥE-mail 1
Film
1
0
0.5
0.75
0.25
ࢥ
1
0
0.5
0.75
0.25
ࢥ
Conference
Gallery
1
0
0.5
0.75
0.25
ࢥ
1
0
0.5
0.75
0.25
ࢥ
End Times
Beginning Times
Predictableedges w.r.t.beginning /end times
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1 0.2 0.90.8 10.70.60.50.40.3
0.1
1
0.01
0.001
per-cont!ct tr!nsmission prob!bilit"
dur!
tio
n of
infe
ctiv
e st!#
e
fr!
ctio
n of
infe
ctiv
es
O r i ! i n " l d " t " S I R
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1 0.2 0.90.8 10.70.60.50.40.3
0.1
1
0.01
0.001
per-cont!ct tr!nsmission prob!bilit"
dur!
tio
n of
infe
ctiv
e st!#
e
fr!
ctio
n of
infe
ctiv
es
I n t e r e v e n t t i m e s S I R
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1 0.2 0.90.8 10.70.60.50.40.3
0.1
1
0.01
0.001
per-cont!ct tr!nsmission prob!bilit"
dur!
tio
n of
infe
ctiv
e st!#
e
fr!
ctio
n of
infe
ctiv
es
B e ! i n n i n ! t i m e s S I R
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1 0.2 0.90.8 10.70.60.50.40.3
0.1
1
0.01
0.001
per-cont!ct tr!nsmission prob!bilit"
dur!
tio
n of
infe
ctiv
e st!#
e
fr!
ctio
n of
infe
ctiv
es
E n d t i m e s S I R
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
E-mail 1
0.1
0
0.05
Film
0
0.05
0.1
Dating 1
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0Forum
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
E-mail 2
0
0.02
0.06
0.08
0.04
Facebook0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
Prostitution
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Hospital
0
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.02
Gallery
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
Conference
0.05
0.1
0Dating 2
end
times
begin
nin
g times
intereven
t times
0.1 0.2 0.90.8 10.70.60.50.40.3
0.1
1
0.01
0.001
per-cont!ct tr!nsmission prob!bilit"
dur!
tio
n of
infe
ctiv
e st!#
e
O r i ! i n " l d " t "
0
0.2
0.3
0.4
!ve
r!#
e nu
mbe
r of
infe
ctio
ns
S I S
0.1
0.1 0.2 0.90.8 10.70.60.50.40.3
0.1
1
0.01
0.001
per-cont!ct tr!nsmission prob!bilit"
dur!
tio
n of
infe
ctiv
e st!#
e
I n t e r e v e n t t i m e s
0
0.2
0.3
0.4
!ve
r!#
e nu
mbe
r of
infe
ctio
ns
S I S
0.1
0.1 0.2 0.90.8 10.70.60.50.40.3
0.1
1
0.01
0.001
per-cont!ct tr!nsmission prob!bilit"
dur!
tio
n of
infe
ctiv
e st!#
e
B e ! i n n i n ! t i m e s
0
0.2
0.3
0.4
!ve
r!#
e nu
mbe
r of
infe
ctio
ns
S I S
0.1
0
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.1 0.2 0.90.8 10.70.60.50.40.3
0.1
1
0.01
0.001
per-cont!ct tr!nsmission prob!bilit"
dur!
tio
n of
infe
ctiv
e st!#
e
!ve
r!#
e nu
mbe
r of
infe
ctio
ns
E n d t i m e s S I S
0.1
0
0.01
0.02
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0
0.05
0.1
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0005
0.001
0 0
0.05
0.1
0
0.001
0.0015
0.0005
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0 0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0
0.01
0.03
0.04
0.02
E-mail 1
Film
Dating 1
Forum
E-mail 2
Facebook Prostitution
Hospital
Gallery
Conference
Dating 2
end
times
begin
nin
g times
intereven
t times
Science by: Illustrations by:
Petter Holme Fredrik Liljeros Mi Jin Lee
P Holme, 2013, PLoS Comp. Biol. 9:e1003142. P Holme, F Liljeros, 2013, arxiv:1307.6436.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
E-mail 1
0
0.2
0.6
0.4
Film
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
E-mail 2
0
0.2
0.4
0
0.4
0.6
0.2
Dating 1
0.8
0.2
0.4
0.6
0
ForumDating 2
0.2
0.8
0
0.4
0.6
–0.4
–0.2
0.2
0.8
0
0.4
0.6
Conference
Hospital
0
0.2
0.4
Prostitution
0
0.1
0.2
Gallery0
0.2
0.8
0.4
0.6
end
times
begin
nin
g times
intereven
t times
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
E-mail 1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
E-mail 2
0
0.4
0.6
0.2
Dating 1
0
0.005
0.01
0.8
0.2
0.4
0ForumDating 2
–0.005
0
0.005
end
times
–0.5
0
0.5
Conference
Hospital
–0.001
0
0.001
Prostitution
0
0.1
0.2
begin
nin
g times
intereven
t times
Gallery0
0.2
0.8
0.4
0.6
0
0.2
0.5
0.4
Film
0.3
0.1