From LOFAR design to SKA1 System

26
1 ASTRON is part of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy From LOFAR design to SKA1 System André Gunst

description

From LOFAR design to SKA1 System. André Gunst. Conclusions. System Engineering Process Crucial for the SKA Non-astronomical requirements are even (more) important Twice the number of LBAs are used to cover 1.5 octave freq. range HBA hierarchical beamforming used to invest more in “area”. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of From LOFAR design to SKA1 System

Page 1: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

1 ASTRON is part of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)

Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy

From LOFAR design to SKA1 System

André Gunst

Page 2: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

2

Conclusions

System Engineering Process Crucial for the SKA

Non-astronomical requirements are even (more) important

Twice the number of LBAs are used to cover 1.5 octave freq. range

HBA hierarchical beamforming used to invest more in “area”

Page 3: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

3

Reflection

Questions, questions, questions …

Should be structured and prioritized in the risk register

Then they should be assigned and mitigated (or not)

Without we will not answer the right questions in time

Page 4: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

4

S c ien c e Ap p lic a tio n sD o c u m en t

S c ien c e Us erR eq u ir em en ts

D o c u m en t

S y s tem R eq u ir em en tS p ec if ic a tio n

S y s tem Arc h itec tu r a lD es ig n D o c u m en t

S u b s y s temR eq u ir em en tS p ec if ic a tio n

S u b s y s temAr c h itec tu r a l

D es ig n D o c u m en tSp ec ify

C omp liance

O p er a tio n sP lan

I n ter f ac e C o n tr o lD o c u m en t

An aly s isR ep o r ts

P r o to ty p ed es ig n s

R ef er en c ed o c u m en ts

Bac k g r o u n dd o c u m en ts

S c ien c ec o n s o r tiu m

S y s tem D es ig n& E n g in eer in g

S D E /w o r k -p ac k ag es

W o r k p ac k ag es

E n g in eer in gr ep o r ts

S im u la tio n s ,an a ly s es , . . .

LOFAR Documentation Plan

Page 5: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

5Not only astro

req.’s

Page 6: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

6

SKA Requirements

Page 7: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

7

Potsdam

Juelich Tautenburg

Garching

Effelsberg

Nancay

Chilbolton

Onsala

Jena

Page 8: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

8

Number and Size of Stations

Total required sensitivity

Minimum size required for station calibration

Instantaneous imaging capability (snapshots)

UV coverage in synthesis mode

System costs

Station electronics: ~ antennas * stations

Network electronics: ~ stations

Correlator: ~ stations2 * beams

Post processing: ~ stations2 * beams * (Bmax/Ds)*Nch

Cost efficient to make FOV with multiple beams and smaller amount of stations

Page 9: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

9

LOFAR station

120-240 MHz

30-80 MHz

Optional10- … MHz

Page 10: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

10

Station “Backend” Electronics

Shared in LOFAR over multiple arrays

LBA optimized for 30-80 MHz (original target 10-80 MHz)

Possibility for two configurations

HBA optimized for 120-240 MHz

“LBL” usable from 10-80 MHz

Page 11: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

11

Central Systems

Shared in LOFAR as well over the multiple arrays

Can only observe one array at the same time

For SKA thought should be given as well to share central systems for all AA arrays and the dishes

Page 12: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

12

1..16delaystep

delaystep

1..16delaystep

delaystep

1..16delaystep

delaystep

Receiver Filterbank

Receiver Filterbank

Receiver Filterbank

Station Beams

HBA Hierarchical Beamforming

Page 13: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

13

HBA Mechanical

Started with “eye catching spiders”

Page 14: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

14

HBA Mechanical

Ended with “boring boxes”

Page 15: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

15

How Could That Happen …

Because

Needs a 15 year lifetime

Needs to withstand storm, snow, sun load

Needs to be assembled in the field efficiently

Needs to have “zero cost”

Industry was involved

All non-astronomical requirements

Page 16: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

16

HBA Assembly

Page 17: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

17

Station Subrack

Page 18: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

18

What if: the money is really limited …

Money shortage leads to creativity

http://artistempowerment.com

Page 19: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

19

Creative Changes

Dutch stations half as large

Two LBA fields in Dutch stations (low cost penalty):

LBA outer array

LBA inner array

Enabled by extra analog input in receiver

HBA field of Core Stations split

UV coverage improved

Station calibration “deproved”

Enabled by scalability of station hardware

Number of output bits

16, 8 or 4 bit

Exchange between bits for beams

Enabled by usage of FPGAs

Page 20: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

20

International Stations (≥ 8)

Page 21: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

21

Remote Stations (16)

Page 22: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

22

Core Stations (24)

Page 23: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

23

Nancay Super Station

Add an extra low band antenna array to the LOFAR station

Uses the “third” receiver input

96 mini arrays

Each array consists of ~ 10 antenna elements

Optimized for < 30 MHz region

Page 24: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

24

What SKA can use …

AA low bandwidth: 70 - 450 MHz (2.5 octave) One antenna type or two? Depends on

Sensitivity profile over frequency Technology + cost

Possibility as well to share backend electronics

Keep doing system engineering

Freeze requirements at System Requirements Review (latest) Everyone benefits: gives focus and clarity Track changes in requirements and analyze impact Changes can ripple through all layers of the system Change = money and sensitivity ~ money!

Page 25: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

25

Conclusions

System Engineering Process Crucial for the SKA

Non-astronomical requirements are even (more) important

Twice the number of LBAs are used to cover 1.5 octave freq. range

HBA hierarchical beamforming used to invest more in “area”

Page 26: From LOFAR design  to SKA1 System

26

The

End