FringeReview Debate: Subjectivity vs objectivity in the process of reviewing creative work

14

description

The Great FringeReview Debate on Reviewing and Critiquing this year discusses subjectivity and objectivity in the process of reviewing and giving feedback. Is it possible to be objective about artistic or creative work?

Transcript of FringeReview Debate: Subjectivity vs objectivity in the process of reviewing creative work

Page 1: FringeReview Debate: Subjectivity vs objectivity in the process of reviewing creative work
Page 2: FringeReview Debate: Subjectivity vs objectivity in the process of reviewing creative work
Page 3: FringeReview Debate: Subjectivity vs objectivity in the process of reviewing creative work
Page 4: FringeReview Debate: Subjectivity vs objectivity in the process of reviewing creative work
Page 5: FringeReview Debate: Subjectivity vs objectivity in the process of reviewing creative work
Page 6: FringeReview Debate: Subjectivity vs objectivity in the process of reviewing creative work
Page 7: FringeReview Debate: Subjectivity vs objectivity in the process of reviewing creative work
Page 8: FringeReview Debate: Subjectivity vs objectivity in the process of reviewing creative work
Page 9: FringeReview Debate: Subjectivity vs objectivity in the process of reviewing creative work
Page 10: FringeReview Debate: Subjectivity vs objectivity in the process of reviewing creative work
Page 11: FringeReview Debate: Subjectivity vs objectivity in the process of reviewing creative work
Page 12: FringeReview Debate: Subjectivity vs objectivity in the process of reviewing creative work
Page 13: FringeReview Debate: Subjectivity vs objectivity in the process of reviewing creative work
Page 14: FringeReview Debate: Subjectivity vs objectivity in the process of reviewing creative work