Freedom of Expression

65
to EXPRESS yourself Feel free

description

School project involving a chapter summary of chapter 2 from Packard's Digital Media Law.

Transcript of Freedom of Expression

Page 1: Freedom of Expression

to EXPRESS yourself

Feel free

Page 2: Freedom of Expression

No country is more

PROTECTIVE of their

right to free speech

than the USA.

Page 3: Freedom of Expression

What gives us thisFREEDOM?

Page 4: Freedom of Expression

THE FIRST AMENDMENT states that we have the RIGHT to

Page 5: Freedom of Expression

Exercise our religious beliefs

Be protected from a state religion

Free speech and free press

Assemble freely

Petition to remedy grievances

Page 6: Freedom of Expression

Does this mean we are free to

say ANYTHING WE WANT?

Page 7: Freedom of Expression

No.

Page 8: Freedom of Expression

The first amendment only

protects us from the

GovernmentNot private citizens

Page 9: Freedom of Expression

You can’t be protected

if you express yourself

on

Page 10: Freedom of Expression

However, it applies to

ALL levels of government.

Page 11: Freedom of Expression

The first amendment preventsRESTRICTIONS

on press PRIOR to publishing.

Page 12: Freedom of Expression

There are 4 exceptions

Page 13: Freedom of Expression

Obstruction of military recruitment or the publication of sailing dates, the number or location of troops

Page 14: Freedom of Expression

Obscenity

Page 15: Freedom of Expression

Incitements to violent overthrow of the government

Page 16: Freedom of Expression

Protection of private rights according to equitable principles

Page 17: Freedom of Expression

The government CAN restrict free press when it is UNSAFE not to do so

Page 18: Freedom of Expression

However, theNEAR STANDARD

must be met

(“direct, immediate, and irreparable damage to our Nation or its people”)

Page 19: Freedom of Expression

These PRIOR RESTRAINT ORDERS come in three forms.

Page 20: Freedom of Expression

are for immediate relief when action will result in IRREPARABLE INJURY.

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS

Page 21: Freedom of Expression

are granted when there is proof of the IRREPARABLE HARM and they are likely to win the case.

PRELIMINARY INJUCTIONS

Page 22: Freedom of Expression

is the last order, to stop the action forever.

A PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Page 23: Freedom of Expression

With new technology, the guidelines for

TRO’s are harder to

FOLLOW.

Page 24: Freedom of Expression

Part of this is from the

STREISAND EFFECT.

Page 25: Freedom of Expression

Censoring material on the internet causes greater

INTEREST, as shown by BARBARA STREISAND.

Page 26: Freedom of Expression

The meaning of FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION has expanded beyond

restricting prior restraint.

Page 27: Freedom of Expression

Any statute that causes a CHILL from others, rendering them afraid to speak their minds, can be struck down.

Page 28: Freedom of Expression

This can come from being tooB R O A D

or too

VAGUE.

Page 29: Freedom of Expression

BROAD statutes can be limited down to prevent intrusion over free speech

Page 30: Freedom of Expression

VAGUE statutes can be CLARIFIED

to protect from subjective enforcement.

Page 31: Freedom of Expression

Even though free speech isPROTECTED

certain limits do apply.

Page 32: Freedom of Expression

Media is protected based on TYPE.

Page 33: Freedom of Expression

Print media is given the

HIGHESTprotection.

Page 34: Freedom of Expression

Broadcast media has to follow certain REGULATIONS but content is often protected.

Page 35: Freedom of Expression

The INTERNET is harder to classify.

Page 36: Freedom of Expression

In 1997, it was granted FULL protection, when previously it

was given restrictions that wereUNCONSTITUTIONALfor other media.

Page 37: Freedom of Expression

Expression is also limited when it poses a THREAT.

Page 38: Freedom of Expression

Other than that, speech cannot be restricted based onCONTENT.

Page 39: Freedom of Expression

Regulations are put under

one of 3 forms of review if they try to limit speech.

Page 40: Freedom of Expression

STRICT SCRUTINY demands specifics be narrowed down, HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY are for those that don’t target a particular idea, and the RATIONAL-BASIS TEST is used to determine if the regulation is sound.

Page 41: Freedom of Expression

There is aTIME,

PLACE, and

MANNERfor expression.

Page 42: Freedom of Expression

PLACES are divided into forum tiers.

Page 43: Freedom of Expression

TRADITIONAL PUBLIC FORUMS

are public spaces that have always been available for speech.

Page 44: Freedom of Expression

Restrictions in such places are underSTRICT SCRUTINY.

Page 45: Freedom of Expression

DESIGNATED or LIMITED PUBLIC

FORUMSare places that are OPENED up to public use for expression.

Page 46: Freedom of Expression

There are specific conditions forRESTRICTING

expression is such places.

Page 47: Freedom of Expression

Content neutral.

No complete bans of speech! Options available.

Specifically for a substantial interest with no more restraints than necessary.

Page 48: Freedom of Expression

NONPUBLIC FORUMSare public areas not available for speech, and are open to restraints.

Page 49: Freedom of Expression

What does the INTERNET

count as?

Page 50: Freedom of Expression

Right now, it seem hard to tell.

Page 51: Freedom of Expression

It seems possible it might be a PUBLIC FORUM,

but other sites may be

NONPUBLIC FORUMS.

Page 52: Freedom of Expression

With the Internet, forums don’t have to bePLACES

but can represent them.

Page 53: Freedom of Expression

Verbal SPEECH is not the only expression that is protected.

Page 54: Freedom of Expression

ASYMBOLIC expressions are also covered in the first amendment, assuming a message is present.

Page 55: Freedom of Expression

It still can beREGULATED,

but there are a few questions that must be answered first.

Page 56: Freedom of Expression

/run Computer code

>is

>BOTH

>speech

>and

>nonspeech.

Page 57: Freedom of Expression

It can be regulated when the restriction is

CONTENT NEUTRAL.

Page 58: Freedom of Expression

Student speech is much more

LIMITEDon campus than off.

Page 59: Freedom of Expression

ALLHowever, students do not lose

their rights when entering school.

Page 60: Freedom of Expression

Their rights can be restricted when expression DISRUPTS class, involves DISORDER, or INVADES other’s rights.

Page 61: Freedom of Expression

Disliking CONTENT is not a justifiably

restriction.

Page 62: Freedom of Expression

LEWDexpression is not allowed, and neither is promotion ofILLEGAL

SUBSTANCES.

Page 63: Freedom of Expression

Just as important as protecting what you SAY is protecting your right to say

NOTHING.

Page 64: Freedom of Expression

So feel freeto say what you need to say.

And keepquietabout the things you don’t want to say.

Page 65: Freedom of Expression

Photo Credits :

http://internetbusinessmastery.com/images/freedom%20of%20expression.jpg http://www.defense.gov/dodcmsshare/homepagephoto/2006-08/hires_flag060805-N-3271W-006.jpghttp://www.mindingthecampus.com/originals/free%20speech.bmphttp://www.thecolorawards.com/gallery/photos/6/800/163681-Private_Property.jpghttp://www.flickr.com/photos/tzofia/377108781/sizes/o/in/photostream/http://www.georgiareporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/6-1024x684.jpghttp://www.aswetravel.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/freedom-travel.jpghttp://www.flickr.com/photos/69805768@N00/3292899689/sizes/l/in/photostream/http://www.flickr.com/photos/phreak20/3414830335/sizes/o/in/photostream/http://www.mattedmundson.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Confused-man-509x338.jpghttp://selfempowermentsecrets.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Self-Empowerment-by-Fostering-skillful-speech.jpg

Information from :

Packard, Ashley Packard. Digital Media Law. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. Print.