Fraud scoring
-
Upload
team-consulting-rus -
Category
Business
-
view
73 -
download
0
Transcript of Fraud scoring
Qualification borrower integrity in retail banking (fraud-scoring)
on the basis of psychosemanticmethods
Content
• Concepts
• Traditional credit scoring
• Idea
• Implementation
• Experiment
• Potential consumers
• Methods of implementation
• Benefits and limitations
• Action plan
• Developers and contacts
13.09.2017Страница 2
Concepts
• Credit scoring is a method for classifying borrowers into different groups when the necessary characteristic is not known (will the loan return), however, other characteristics are known which are in some way related to the interest
• Psychosemantics is an area of psychology that studies an individual system of values that affects the processes of thinking, memory, decision making, etc.
13.09.2017Страница 3
Scoring in microfinance organizations
• According to the passport
• According to the work book
• according to relatives
• Visual evaluation
13.09.2017Страница 4
Idea
At bona fide and unscrupulous borrowers a different attitude to the loan / loan
This difference can be revealed by psychosemanticmethods according to individual systems of meanings
we conducted an experiment
and confirmed our assumption
13.09.2017Страница 5
Implementation
When making a loan, the borrower fills out a psychosemantic questionnaire
The data is immediately processed on-line
Result: an assessment of the borrower "+" or "-"
13.09.2017Страница 6
Filling out a questionnaire
Assessment of the borrower
Decision to grant / refuse a loan
Interface example
13.09.2017Страница 7
Questions Example
13.09.2017Страница 8
Description of the application
13.09.2017Страница 9
• from 30 to 50 points
• filling time - 3-10 minutes
• points vary for different socio-
demographic groups
• in the questionnaire there is a system of
protection against "key selection"
Decision-making
13.09.2017Страница 10
On the basis of personal data, the borrower's profile is compared with the reference model of a bona fide and unscrupulous borrower
Reasons for the non-repayment of a loan
• Planned non-return
• Unforeseen non-return
The proposed psychosemantic system can
recognize only the first type, i.e. Fraud-
scoring
13.09.2017Страница 11
Solutions
Evaluation Solution
"Good" borrower We give out the credit
"Bad" borrower We do not issue a loan
"Unclear"* We do not issue a loan
13.09.2017Страница 12
* - the "not clear" estimate arises in cases when there is not enough data for a certain subgroup of borrowers or when the profile of the borrower can not be attributed to a positive or negative
EXPERIMENT
Checking the accuracy of psychosemantic scoring in the retail lending system
13.09.2017Страница 13
Data collection for the model
947 borrowers on receipt of commodity loans in two cities of Russia in the stores of household appliances passed the traditional procedure of credit scoring and additionally filled the psychosemantic questionnaire
After 6 months we received information from the bank about how borrowers pay out loans: 880 paid on time, and 67 borrowers did not pay on the loan
13.09.2017Страница 14
Experiment
From the data on 947 borrowers we:
• randomly selected from 20 to 200 profiles
• made an assessment of these borrowers on the model based on the psychosemantic method
• offered a loan decision
• compared our decision with the real behavior of the borrower
• evaluated the correctness of our decision (guessed / not guessed)
13.09.2017Страница 15
Verification 1. N = 20
13.09.2017Страница 16
When checking on a random sample: N = 20 people out of 947
A 70% loan was given to those who applied, 30% refused.Returned - 65%.Not returned - 5%.
Verification 2. N = 50
13.09.2017p. 17
When checking on a random sample N = 50 people out of 947
The loan was given to 84% of those who applied, 16%Returned - 80%Not returned - 4%
Verification 3. N = 99
13.09.2017Страница 18
When checking on a random sample N = 99 people out of 947
The loan was granted to 76% of applicants, 24% refused.Returned - 75%.Not returned - 1%.
Verification 4. N = 200
13.09.2017Страница 19
When checking for a random sample, N = 200 people out of 947
A 70% loan was given to those who applied, 30% refused.Returned - 69.5%.Did not return - 0,5%.
Conclusions on the experiment
• The addition of psychosemantic scoring increases the accuracy of conventional credit scoring to 98.7%
• The number of issued loans is reduced by 25%
• With the increase in the number of loans granted and the accumulation of data for the model, i.e. as self-training, the accuracy of the forecast increases and the share of loans extended
• The possibilities of evaluation only in the psychosemantic way require a separate verification
13.09.2017Страница 20
START UP
Possibility of commercial realization of the idea of psychosemanticonline scoring in the system of retail lending and microfinance
13.09.2017Страница 21
Potential consumers
• Microfinance organizations
• Organizations that provide loans on-line
• Banks engaged in retail lending
• Trading networks selling goods with payment by installments
• Mutual lending systems
• Online Stores
13.09.2017Страница 22
Traditional retail loan
13.09.2017Страница 23
planned non-repayment of retail loans -11%
The volume of retail lending in Russia in 2012 amounted to about 6000 billion rubles
Annual growth from 2010 - about 40% *
* According to Euromonitor International
The share of overdue loans in retail lending in 2011 (% in the loan portfolio) is 5.7% *
Loans in microfinance organizations
13.09.2017Страница 24
In Russia in 2012, about 2-3 million microloans were issued for the amount (according to various estimates) from 15 to 50 billion rubles *
average growth of about 50-100% per year *
1183 MFOs as of January 1, 2012 according to the register of the FSFM **
as of July 1, 2011, there were only 192, for six months the growth was
5 times
Non-return: small cities - up to 20%
large cities - up to 50%
* Российская газета, http://www.rg.ru/2013/01/29/mikrozaymi.html** http://www.eg-online.ru/news/164555/
Competitive assessment technologies
1) Assessment of online credit history: expensive!
• 200 rubles - check of 1 borrower
• 9000 rubles - installation of 1 interface
2) Assessment according to bailiffs: there are no "newcomers" and are in the process
3) Evaluation of social activity on the Internet: fraud!
13.09.2017Страница 25
What is the value?
Risk reduction:
the accuracy of the loan repayment estimate to 98.7%
the "human factor" is excluded (to give "one's own") by automating the interaction between the borrower and the lending institution
Special protection against "key selection" and "good questionnaire"
13.09.2017Страница 26
What is the value?
Save time:
1-3 minutes for decision making
Save money:
• does not need an office, the evaluation takes place on-line
• no special trained personnel required
• Reduces the cost of working with arrears
• Cheaper evaluation on credit history
13.09.2017Страница 27
Interest rates
34% - express loan in the store
180% pawnshop
260-1000% - loans in a microfinance organization
13.09.2017Страница 28
Reducing the risk of non-return is the possibility of lowering the% rate and increasing profit
Methods of implementing the system
• As an element of a unique Internet product - on-line micro-credit systems
• As a remote service for assessing the good faith of the borrower for any credit institution (SaaS)
13.09.2017Страница 29
What is the investment appeal?
• Term of sale up to 6 months
• Payback period from 1 year
• Scalability
• Ability to use in in other countries
• Initial investment of about $ 50,000
13.09.2017Страница 30
What is the investment appeal?
• A certain range of consumers
– Microfinance institutions
– Credit institutions, supported loans on-line
– Banks engaged in retail lending
– Trading networks selling goods with payment by installments
– Mutual lending systems
• Clear promotion system
– Personal sales
13.09.2017Страница 31
Complexities of implementation
• It is required to form the
initial database for 1000 loans
issued
• Inertness of credit institutions
to introduce innovations
13.09.2017Страница 32
Security Risks
• "Drain" the database from the provider
• Conscious damage to the database from the provider
• Introduction of a virus program for automatic key selection
• Multiple entry of data from one IP address to select a key
• Leak of the program code for decryption and obtaining calculation algorithms
• Mass distribution through the Internet of questionnaires that received a positive decision
• Loss of communication during the filling of the questionnaire
13.09.2017Страница 33
Risks of implementation
• There are not enough associations
• Few data on groups of unscrupulous borrowers
• It may be necessary to adapt the semantics for each group of borrowers
• Resistance from borrowers: unusual deters
13.09.2017Страница 34
What is to be done?
• Designing and implementing a friendly interface for the client
• Design and implementation of the database and security system
• Questioning of real clients (about 1000 people) and building a model
• Checking the model
13.09.2017Страница 35
2 test options
1) a check on the old borrower model, which we did in 2008 for short-term loans (3-6 months) at points of sale.
The MFO / bank launches 100 questionnaires when issuing a loan, we process them on the old model and give the answer: "good borrower", "bad borrower", "not clear." We compare our assessment with the real behavior of the borrower and obtain an estimate of the accuracy of the forecast
A possible source of error is the old borrower model.
13.09.2017Страница 36
2 test options
2) check on the new model of the borrower.
The MFO / bank launches 1,200 questionnaires when issuing a loan. Then we are given 1000 questionnaires and the results of the borrowers' behavior (returned-not returned). We are making a new borrower model for the MFI / bank.
Then we process 200 questionnaires on a new model, for which we have no information, and we give the answer: "a good borrower," "a bad borrower," "it's not clear." The MFI / bank compares our assessment with the actual behavior of the last 200 borrowers and obtains an estimate of the accuracy of the forecast.
13.09.2017Страница 37
Publications
Semenov M.Yu., Semenova I.I. Possibilities of psychological means for assessing the integrity of the lending borrower in retail trade // The Omsk scientific bulletin .- 2010. -No 5 (91). - P. 134-136.
Semenova II, Andieva E.Yu. On the construction of the psychological profile of the borrower for risk assessment in the sphere of consumer lending // Risk Management.-2008.- №1 (45) .- P.56-63.
and etc.
13.09.2017Страница 38
Developers and contacts
Semenov Mikhail
PhD (psychology, candidate of sciences) expert in the field of economic psychology and psychology of money
mymoney.pro mob. + 7-919-009-77-37 [email protected]
Semenova Irina
PhD (candidate of technical sciences), expert in the field of system analysis and databases
semenova.pro mob. + 7-919-000-11-74 [email protected]
Andieva Elena
PhD (candidate of technical sciences), expert-analyst
13.09.2017Страница 39