Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
Transcript of Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
1/92
FIRST DRAFT
\\ COMMON FINANCIAL STATEMENT STATEMENT FRAUD SCHEMES
Jamal Ahmad, JD., C.P.A.David Jansen, C.A.
Jonny J. Frank, J.D., LL.M.
Contents
1 Introduction
2 Categories ofFinancial Statement Fraud
3 Fraudulent Financial Reporting3.1Earnings Management Methods Permissible by GAAP; The Grey Zone3.2Earnings Management Methods Not Permissible by GAAP
4 Overview of Largest Fraudulent Financial Reporting Cases(1997 2002)
5 Improper Revenue Recognition5.1 Reviewing for and Investigating Allegations of Improper RevenueRecognition
5.1.1 Accounting Policies and Customer Contracts5.1.2 Forensic Auditing Techniques5.2 Side Agreements5.3Liberal Return, Refund Or Exchange Rights5.4Channel Stuffing
5.5Early Delivery Of Products5.5.1 Partial Shipments5.5.2 Soft Sales5.5.3 Contracts With Multiple Deliverables5.5.4 Up-Front Fees5.6Bill and Hold Transactions5.7Fictitious Revenue Schemes5.7.1 Fictitious Sales5.7.2 Round Tripping5.8Other Improper Recognition Schemes5.8.1 Recognizing Revenue On Disputed Claims Against Customers
5.8.2 Holding The Books Open Past The End Of A Period5.8.3 Recognizing Income On Consignment Sales Or On ProductsShipped For Trial Or Evaluation Purposes
5.8.4 Construction Accounting Schemes5.8.5 Sham Related Party Transactions
6 Asset Overstatement/Liability Understatement Schemes
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
2/92
FIRST DRAFT
6.1Inventory Schemes6.1.1 Inflating Inventory Quantity (Fictitious Inventory)6.1.2 Inflating Inventory Value6.1.3 Fraudulent Or Improper Inventory Capitalization6.2 Accounts Receivable Schemes
6.2.1 Creating Fictitious Receivables6.2.2 Artificially Inflating The Value Of Receivables6.3 Investment Schemes6.3.1 Fictitious Investments6.3.2 Manipulating The Value Of Investments
Misclassification of Investments Recording Unrealized
Declines in Fair Market Value/Overvaluation6.4 Improper Capitalization of Expenses6.4.1 Software Development6.4.2 Research and Development6.4.3 Start Up Costs
6.4.4 Interest Costs6.4.5 Advertising Costs6.5 Recording Fictitious Fixed Assets6.6 g Depreciation and Amortization Schemes
7 Understatement of Liabilities7.1General7.2Off Balance Sheet Entity Schemes7.2.1 Off Balance Sheet Treatment versus Consolidation7.2.2 The Old Rules7.2.3 The New Rules7.3Overstatement of Liability Reserves (Cookie Jar Reserves)
8. Improper or Inadequate Disclosures
9. Materiality
10 Misappropriation of Assets10.1 Misappropriation of Cash
10.1.1 Skimming of Cash
Unrecorded or Understated Sales or Receivables
Lapping10.1.2Fraudulent Disbursements
Billing Schemes - Creation of Fictitious Vendors or ShellCompanies to Convert Monies
Billing Schemes - False Credits, Rebates, Refunds andKickbacks
Billing Schemes - Over billing
Billing Schemes - Pay and Return Schemes
Theft of Company Checks
Payroll Fraud - Ghost Employees
2
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
3/92
FIRST DRAFT
Payroll Fraud - Falsified Hours10.2 Misappropriation of Inventory Conversion of Inventory
10.2.1Conversion of Inventory10.2.2False Write-Offs and Other Debits to Inventory10.2.3False Sales of Inventory
11. Other Fraudulent Revenue and Expenditures11.1 Revenue And Assets Obtained By Fraud11.2 Expenditures and Liabilities For An Improper Purpose
3
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
4/92
FIRST DRAFT
1. Introduction
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 991 (SAS 99) requires auditors to focus
on two broad areas of fraud: (i) fraudulent financial reporting and (ii)
misappropriation of assets. Each of these has a multitude of fraud schemes.
This chapter provides an overview of the most common financial statement fraud
schemes, indicators of their occurrence, and methods of detection.
The focus is to familiarize the reader with certain fraud schemes, the various
indicators which evidence that these schemes may be or are being perpetrated
and how an auditor might detect those schemes. While this chapter discusses
numerous fraud schemes, it does not contain a comprehensive list of all possible
schemes. Similarly, with respect to the listed schemes, space constraints
prevent discussion of all possible detection procedures the auditor can perform to
determine whether the particular scheme exists.
2. 2. Categories ofFinancial Statement Fraud
Fraud schemes can be grouped in various categories. For example, from a legal
perspective, frauds can be distinguished between: frauds bythe corporation and
frauds against the corporation. Frauds committed by the corporation carry legal
risk, that is, potential civil, regulatory, and criminal liability. Frauds committed
against the corporation carry financial risk, that is, the loss of income or assets.
External and internal misappropriations of assets are by far the most common
fraud against the corporation.
This chapter groups, Ffinancial frauds generally falinto three four broad
categories:
Fraudulent Financial Reporting Schemes;
Misappropriation Of Assets;
Revenue And Assets Obtained By Fraud and
4
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
5/92
FIRST DRAFT
Expenditures and Liabilities For An Improper Purpose Other economic
frauds and misconduct.
Most auditors would consideronly to the first two categories (fraudulent financial
reporting and misappropriation of assets) to be financial statement frauds. The
final two categories although financial in nature, are not generally considered to
be financial statement frauds, as they do not impact upon the balances in the
financial statements.
Alternatively, frauds can be distinguished between: frauds bythe corporation and
frauds against the corporation. Frauds committed by the corporation carry legal
risk, that is, potential civil, regulatory, and criminal liability. According to the SEC,
the most common schemes involve earnings management - - improper revenue
recognition schemes, and schemes to overstate assets or understate liabilities.
Frauds committed against the corporation carry financial risk, that is, the loss of
income or assets because of fraud. External and internal misappropriations of
assets are by far the most common fraud against the corporation.
3. Fraudulent Financial Reporting
Most fraudulent financial reporting schemes involve earnings management,
which the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has defined as the use
of various forms of gimmickry to distort a companys true financial performance in
order to achieve a desired result.2
Earnings management, however, does not always involve outright violations of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) - - more often than not,
entities manage earnings by choosing accounting policies that bend GAAP to
attain earnings targets. Thus, it is important to distinguish between earnings
5
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
6/92
FIRST DRAFT
management techniques that are aggressive in nature but otherwise permitted by
GAAP, and those that clearly violate GAAP.
Accountants working with public companies, however, take note. The SEC takes
the position that compliance with GAAP will not necessarily protect an entity from
an SEC enforcement action, if financial performance is distorted.3
3.1 Earnings Management Techniques Permissible Under GAAP:The Grey Zone
GAAP frequently allows management alternative ways to record the operations
of an entity. For instance, GAAPallows any depreciation method, so long as it
systemically and rationally allocates the cost of the asset over its useful life. 4
Similar instances in which management is provided wide latitude include:
Changing depreciation methods from an accelerated method to the moreconservative straight-line method or vice versa;
Changing the useful lives or the estimates of salvage values of assets;
Determining the appropriate allowance required for uncollectible accountsreceivable;
Determining whether/when assets have become impaired and arerequired to be reserved against or written off;
Choosing an appropriate method of inventory valuation (LIFO, FIFO,specific identification etc.);
Determining whether a decline in the market value of an investment istemporary or permanent; and
Estimating the write-downs required for investments.
Thus, in certain instances, GAAP allows a company to manage earnings by
simply altering its accounting policy to select those accounting principles that
benefit it most. The SEC itself has noted that accounting principles are not
meant to be a straightjacket and that flexibility of accounting is essential to
innovation.5 Abuses occur, however, when this flexibility is exploited to distort
the true picture of the corporation.6
6
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
7/92
FIRST DRAFT
Entities have a host of reasons for selecting those principles that will paint the
rosiest financial picture. Some would argue that the market demands it, as
reflected by the stock price punishment for companies that differ by as little as
one penny per share from prior estimates. External market pressures to meet
the numbers conflicts with market pressure for transparency in financial
reporting.
Often, it is difficult to distinguish between aggressive, but allowable accounting
and that which is abusive and prohibited. How, for example, does one determine
whether managements reserve for uncollectible accounts is or is not
reasonable?
The line between aggressive and fraudulent behavior hinges on management s
intent. Fraud rarely occurs if managements intent is transparent and clearly
understandable. What, however, if management selects a GAAP permissive
policy to conceal a fraud or error? Does the selection of the otherwise allowed
policy demonstrate intent to commit fraud? Consider also whether management
selects a policy that it knows will have both a positive and negative effect on the
financial picture. If management selects the policy but refuses to recognize the
negative effect, does that demonstrate fraud in the selection of the policy?
Whether a fraud has been committed is fact-specific. For purposes of this
chapter, we have assumed that management has acted with malicious intent.
The case examples cited also involve instances where the company and/or its
management was charged and most often found guilty of wilfully engaging in the
alleged misconduct.
3.2 Earnings Management Methods Not Permissible by GAAP
Some financial frauds have no grey; that is, earnings management that are
clearly not within the parameters of GAAP. These techniques can inflate
7
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
8/92
FIRST DRAFT
earnings, create an improved financial picture, or conversely, mask a
deteriorating one.
Examples cited by the SEC include:
Big Bath charges;
Creative acquisition accounting;
Cookie jar liability reserves;
Use of materiality to record small but intentional misstatements in thefinancial statements; and
Revenue recognition irregularities.7
4. Overview of Largest Fraudulent Financial Reporting Fraud Cases(1997 2002)
To demonstrate the breadth of recent fraud cases, the table below outlines some
of the larger and more publicized frauds and accounting scandals detected over
the period 1997 2002. The schemes involved an array of industries and
included both frauds by and against the entity as well as corporate
misconduct.
Company Fraud Scheme Result
AdelphiaCommunications
Misappropriation of firm assetsby executives for personal use.Concealment of $2.3 billion inloans to cover losses by founderand family members.
Declared bankruptcy inJanuary 2002. CEO andfamily members charged withfraud.
Cendant Corp. As a result of its merger of HFCwith CUC International, it wasrevealed that CUC overstatedrevenue by $500 million between1995 and 1997 using assortedtechniques such as recording
fictitious revenues andunderstating liabilities.
Restated 1997 earningsdecreased by more than $161million.Former CFO, VP, andcontroller pled guilty tonumerous other charges.
Company settled $3.2 billionshareholder suitErnst & Young paid $335million to settle shareholderlawsuit.
Enron Overstated income byintentionally understatingliabilities and concealing debt
Declared bankruptcy inDecember 2001.Lost more than $80 billion in
8
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
9/92
FIRST DRAFT
Company Fraud Scheme Resultthrough the creation of offbalance sheet entities.Inadequately disclosed Co.s offbalance sheet transactions.
Possible tax evasion.
market capitalization.Former CFO among othersconvicted of moneylaundering and securities,
wire and mail fraud.Additional charges broughtagainst others.Resulted in dissolution ofcompany and accountantsArthur Anderson.
Global Crossing Charged with using "swap deals"with other telecom carriers toinflate sales.
Declared bankruptcy January2002.SEC investigations pending.
K-Mart Inflated revenue by improperlyrecognizing entire $42.3 million in
revenue from a multiyearcontract in 2nd quarter of 2001.
Declared bankruptcy, January2002.
Two former VPs charged withearnings fraud.MicroStrategy Improperly recognized revenue
from sales of software asagreements were entered intorather than as services wereprovided.
Restated earnings for fiscalyears 1998 and 1999, whichcaused revenues to bereduced by almost $66million.Former CEO, COO, and CFOeach fined $350,000.
Sunbeam Corp. Created $35 million ininappropriate restructuring
reserves in 1996 that werereversed in 1997 to inflateincome thus creating the illusionof a rapid turn around.In 1997, reported over $70million of revenue from bill andhold sales, channel stuffing andother inappropriate accountingpractices.
Restated 1997 income from$109 million to $38 million.
CEO charged with violatingfederal securities laws bymisrepresenting materialinformation about thecompany. CEO settled bypaying a piece of a $141million fine.Former controller and chiefaccounting officer eachagreed to pay $100,000 infines.
Former Arthur Andersonpartner also settled forundisclosed amount.
TycoInternational
Misappropriation of $600 millionby CEO and CFO for personaluse through theft and the falsesale of securities.Company also separately sued
Three former executivesincluding CEO and generalcounsel arrested for fraud.CEO also charged withavoiding payment of over $1
9
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
10/92
FIRST DRAFT
Company Fraud Scheme Resultformer CEO seeking the return ofmore than $100 million. Suitalleges CEO gave himselfunauthorized bonuses totalling
$58 million and unauthorizedloans of more than $43 million,and of taking personal credit formore than $43 million incharitable donations that actuallywere made by Tyco.
million in sales taxes on $13million of artwork
WorldCom Intentionally improperlycapitalized billions of dollars ofexpenses as capitalexpenditures.Former CEO facing possible
charges for allegedly profitingimproperly from IPOs offered bybrokerages in return for investment banking business.
Declared bankruptcy, July2002. Former finance chiefand finance and accountingexecutives charged withsecurities fraud.
Xerox Overstated revenue for over 4years by accelerating therecognition of $3 billion inrevenue and inflating earnings byabout $1.5 billion. Allegedscheme included the recognitionof revenue on its office copier
leases too early in their cycles.
Co. agreed to pay $10 millionin fines and restate its incomefor the years 1997-2000.
SEC sued three currentKPMG partners and oneformer partner of securities
fraud in the claiming the firmfraudulently let the Co.manipulate its accountingpractices to fill a $3 billion gapand make it appear to bemeeting market expectations.
5. Improper Revenue Recognition
Improper recognition of revenue - either prematurely or of fictitious revenue is
the most common form of fraudulent earnings management. Premature
recognition of revenue involves the recording of revenue generated through
legitimate means, at any time prior than would be allowed under GAAP.
Premature recognition should be distinguished from recognition of fictitious
revenue derived from false sales or to false customers.
10
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
11/92
FIRST DRAFT
The Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting
(hereinafter, the COSO Report)8 found that improper revenue recognition was
alleged in 47% of the cases reviewed by the Commission from 1981 to 1986. A
second COSO Report found that the number of revenue recognition alleged
matters accounted for 50% of all matters enforced by the SEC from 1987-1997. 9
According to SEC figures, 32 of the 90 actions bought by the Commission in
1999 involved improper revenue recognition using such techniques as side
letters, rights of return, consignment sales, and the shipping of unfinished
products. Another 12 cases involved the booking of fictitious sales.10
A PricewaterhouseCoopers study revealed that in the year 2000, 66% of the
shareholder actions filed alleged revenue recognition violations.11 In 2001, the
number of revenue recognition actions jumped to 69% of all actions filed.12
Finally, of the approximately 140 earnings management/accounting cases
brought by the SEC in 2002, more than half related to revenue recognition. 13
With respect to premature recognition, SEC Staff Accounting Bulleting 101,
Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, (SAB 101) 14 spells out four
basic criteria that must be met before a public company may recognize revenue.
Specifically, these criteria require:
Persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; Evidence that delivery has occurred or that services have been rendered; A showing that the seller's price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and Ability to collect payment must be reasonably assured.
SAB 101 echoes the recognition requirements originally listed in AICPA
Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition15, which
governs the software industry. Accountants should also refer to industry specific
literature depending upon the client and circumstances.16 In fact, SAB 101
explains that where it exists, companies should apply industry specific authority
over SAB 101.
11
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
12/92
FIRST DRAFT
Many of the schemes described in this chapter violate more than one of the SAB
101 recognition criteria. The indicia for each listed scheme are not mutually
exclusive; that is; factors indicating the potential existence of one scheme can
often be used to detect others.
Companies can use numerous methods to engage in premature or fictitious
revenue recognition. Following are the most common techniques:
Agreements or policies which grant liberal return, refund orexchange rights;
Side agreements;
Channel stuffing;
Early delivery of product
Contracts with multiple deliverables; Soft sales;
Partial shipments; and
Up-front fees;
Bill and hold transactions;
Recording false sales to existing customers and false sales tofictitious customers;
Round tripping
Other forms of improper recognition:
Recognizing revenue on disputed claims against customers;
Holding the books open past the end of a period; Recognizing income on consignment sales or on products
shipped for trial or evaluation purposes; and
Improper accounting for construction contracts ; and
Sham related party transactions.
5.1 Reviewing For and Investigating Allegations of Improper RevenueRecognition
5.1.1 Accounting Polices and Customer Contracts
Inquiries into alleged improper revenue recognition usually begin with a review of
the entitys revenue recognition policies and customer contracts. The auditor
considers the reasonableness of the companys normal recognition practice and
whether the company has done everything necessary to comply. For example, if
12
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
13/92
FIRST DRAFT
the company customarily obtains a written sale agreement, the absence of a
written agreement becomes a red flag.
The review should begin with a detailed reading of the contract terms and
provisions. Particular attention should be focused upon terms governing (i)
payment and shipment, (ii) delivery and acceptance, (iii) risk of loss, (iv) terms
requiring future performance on the part of the seller before payment, (v)
payment of up-front fees, and (vi) other contingencies. The auditor must consider
timing particularly as it relates to the companys quarter and year-end periods.
In which periods were the sales agreements obtained? When was the product or
equipment delivered to the buyers site? When did the buyer become obligated
to pay? What additional service(s) was required of the seller?
In the absence of a written agreement, the auditor should consider other
evidence of the transaction, e.g. purchase orders, shipping documents, payment
records, etc. He or she should also consider SAB 101 as well pronouncements
specific to the particular business, as accounting literature often contains relevant
examples and issues. For example, companies engaged in business over the
internet face unique revenue recognition issues. The Emerging Issues Task
Force Abstract (EITF) 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus
Net as an Agent, 17 attempts to solve this problem by listing factors which are
considered by the SEC in determining whether revenue should be reported on a
gross or net basis. Similarly EITF 01-9,Accounting for Consideration Given by a
Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendors Products),18
addresses the issue of sales incentives, such as discounts, coupons, rebates,
and "free" products or services offered by manufacturers to customers of retailers
or other distributors. Being aware of the applicable authority governing the facts
and circumstances can assist the auditor in his determination of recognition
violations.
5.1.2 Forensic Auditing Techniques
13
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
14/92
FIRST DRAFT
The auditor should perform the following techniques when investigating revenue
recognition allegations:
Inquire of management and other relevant personnel as to the existence
factors causing the auditor to believe the scheme exists19; Perform substantive analytics designed to detect the fraud being
investigated; and
Perform substantive testing to determine whether there is evidence tosupport the existence of a scheme or lack of evidence to support thevalidity of a transaction. Such substantive procedures include but are notlimited to:
- Request and review documents such as contracts and supportfor invoices and deliveries;
- Confirmation with customers to the existence of accountsreceivable and the amount of consigned goods;
- Possible public records/background research/site visitsconducted on customers/third parties to verify existence of theentity being billed;
- Analyzing journal entry activity and supporting documentation incertain accounts, focusing on round dollar entries at the end ofperiods;
- If entries are accruals, obtaining support for the reversal andconfirming the proper timing of the entries.
The following general indicators can often alert the auditor or auditor as to thepotential existence of premature revenue recognition:
Unexplained change in recognition policies;
Unexplained improvements in gross margin;
Increasing sales with no corresponding increase in cash from operations;
Reported sales, revenue or accounts receivable balances which appear tobe to high or are increasing too fast;
Reported sales discount, sales returns or bad debts expenses whichappear to be too low;
Large, numerous or unusual sales transactions occurring shortly before
the end of the period; Large amounts of returns or credits after the close of a period; or
Inconsistent business activity - Increased revenues with no corresponding increase in distribution
costs or- Increased revenues with no offsetting increase in accounts receivable.
14
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
15/92
FIRST DRAFT
The use of analytics should also not be overlooked as a means of detecting
fraud. Analytical procedures and relationships the auditor can perform or review
to determine whether revenue is being recognized prematurely include:
Comparing current period financial statement line item amounts with
amounts from prior periods and inquiring as to significant changes inaccounts between periods (Horizontal Testing, See Chapter );
Reviewing balances in revenue related accounts for unusual changes;
Calculating the percent of sales and receivables to the total balance sheetin the current period, comparing it with prior periods and inquiring of anyunusual changes (Vertical Testing, See Chapter ) ;
Reviewing the statement of cash flows to determine if cash collected is inproportion to reported revenues;
Reviewing sales activity for the period and note any unusual trends orincreases such as increases towards the end of the period;
Significant or unusual or unexplained changes in the following particularratios (See Chapter XX for a detailed explanation of ratios):o Increases in Net Profit Margin (Net Income/Total Sales);
o Increases in Gross Profit Margin (Gross Profit/Net Sales);
o Increases in the Current Ratio (Current Assets/Current Liabilities);
o Increases in the Quick ratio (Cash and Receivables and Marketable
Securities/Current Liabilities);o Increases in the Accounts Receivable Turnover (Net Sales/A/R);
o Increases to Days Sales Outstanding (A/R Turnover/365);
o Increases in Sales Return Percentages (Sales Returns/TotalSales);
o Increase in Asset Turnover (Total Sales/Average Total Assets);o Increases in Working Capital Turnover (Sales/Average Working
Capital);o Decrease in A/R Allowance as a % of A/R (Allowance/Total A/R);
ando Decreases in the bad debt expense or allowance accounts.
Of course, good interviewing and sound analytics will not substitute for having a
good understanding of the clients business. Even seasoned auditors have been
misled and thought revenue to be appropriate because they did not fully
understand the business. Thus, after all the analytics and interviews, the auditor
must ask him or herself whether the information and results obtained make
sense in light of the clients industry and business. The auditor should also to the
extent applicable, benchmark performance results against other companies in
the same industry.
15
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
16/92
FIRST DRAFT
5.2Side Agreements
While SAB 101 requires a definitive sales or service agreement, agreements can
and often are legitimately amended. Problems arise however when a companyenters into such an arrangement and subsequently modifies, supplements,
revokes, or otherwise amends the original agreement with a written or oral side
agreement prepared and agreed to outside the normal reporting channels of the
business.
Management often employ side arrangements or letters to boost sales figures.
Sales force members also use them to meet sales targets or to obtain
undeserved commissions. Side agreements created outside of the normal and
proper recording channels are often used to perpetrate many of the schemes
listed in this chapter.
The existence of numerous side agreements should raise red flags to the auditor
and require further detailed inquiry as to the facts and circumstances surrounding
how, when and why the agreements were entered into. Additional investigation
is warranted if the inquiry points to preparation outside the normal reporting
channels.
Common side agreement fraud schemes involve:
Liberal or unconditional rights of return granted to customers;
Rights to cancel orders at any time;
Contingencies that nullify the sale, such as:o Re-sale;
o Receipt of funding;
Rights of continuing negotiations; and
Extension of payment terms.
Case Illustration
The case of Informix Corp illustrates the improper use of side-agreements. 20
Informix sold licensed software to companies, which, in turn, would resell the
16
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
17/92
FIRST DRAFT
licenses to third parties. Consistent with then current GAAP for revenue
recognition with respect to software21, the companys written policy was to
recognize revenue from the sale of licenses only upon receipt of a signed and
dated license agreement. However, to meet the earnings expectations of the
company and financial analysts, management entered into numerous written and
oral side agreements containing different provisions, which caused them to
violate GAAP revenue recognition principles. These provisions included:
Allowing resellers to return and to receive a refund or credit for unsoldlicenses;
Committing the company to use its own sales force to find customers forresellers;
Offering to assign future end-user orders to resellers;
Extending payment dates beyond twelve months;
Committing the company to purchase computer hardware or services fromcustomers under terms that effectively refunded all, or a substantialportion, of the license fees paid by the customer;
Offering to pay for customer storage costs;
Diverting the company's own future service revenues to customers as ameans of refunding their license fees; and
Paying fictitious consulting or other fees to customers to be repaid to thecompany as license fees.
Auditors should perform inquiries of management, accounting and sales
personnel as to whether they are made aware of all side agreements entered into
by the other party that modify sales in any one of the methods mentioned or in
any other fashion. The auditor should also inquire of sales people whether they
are allowed or encouraged to use side letters or agreements to complete a sale
and whether these agreements are made using proper reporting channels.
In addition to inquires, the auditor should review the companys right of return
policy and understand its rationale. The auditor should satisfy him or herself byreviewing a sample of contracts for side agreements and confirm with a sample
of customers the major contract terms of their contracts, including the existence
or absence of any side agreements.
5.3 Liberal Return, Refund, Or Exchange Rights
17
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
18/92
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
19/92
FIRST DRAFT
In the case of Midisoft Corporation, 24 the SEC charged the company with
overstating revenue on in the amount of $458,000 on transactions for which
products were shipped, but for which, at the time of shipment, the company had
no reasonable expectation that the customer would accept and pay for the
products. The company eventually accepted back most of the product as sales
returns during the first quarter of the subsequent period.
The SEC noted that Midisofts written distribution agreements generally allowed
the distributor wide latitude to return product to Midisoft for credit whenever the
product was, in the distributor's opinion, damaged, obsolete, or otherwise unable
to be sold. In preparing Midisoft's financial statements for fiscal 1994, company
personnel submitted a proposed allowance for future product returns that was
unreasonably low in light of the large levels of returns Midisoft received in the first
several months of 1995. Furthermore, various officers and employees in the
companys Accounting and Sales Departments knew the exact amount of returns
the company had received prior to the end of March 1995, when the companys
independent auditors finished their field work on the 1994 audit. Had Midisoft
revised the allowance for sales returns to reflect the returns information, it would
have had to reduce accordingly the amount of net revenue reported for fiscal
1994. Instead, several Midisoft officers and employees devised schemes to
prevent the auditors from discovering the true amount of the returns including
preventing the auditors from touring that portion of the Midisoft headquarters
where the returned goods were stored. In addition, Midisoft accounting
personnel altered records contained in the computer accounting system to
reduce falsely the level of returns.
Midisoft teaches that the auditor should carefully review the terms of the
contracts and any side or extension agreements to determine what rights are
afforded the customer with respect to returning and exchanging the delivered
product. Only in those cases where the customer has limited or no right to return
the product should revenue be recognized. The auditor should also inquire into
19
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
20/92
FIRST DRAFT
the companys refund and exchange policy: how it was derived, whether it is
subject to override, by whom and how often it is overridden. Other relevant
inquiries include sales personnel as to whether the company has offered
customers price concessions, refunds, or new products.
Auditors should also inquire of accounting staff and financial personnel as to the
returns policy and confirm with warehouse personnel who process returns that
the policy is being followed. In addition to the inquiries, the auditor may also
choose to perform the following analytics:
Compare returns in current period to prior periods and inquire as to anyunusual increases;
Determine whether returns are processed timely (this may require a visitan inquiry with warehouse personnel, an inquiry can also be made ofcustomers on confirmations)
o Companies may slow down the return processing process to avoid
reducing sales in the current period.
Perform sales return percentage (Sales Returns/Total Sales) and inquireas to any unusual increase; and
Compare returns subsequent to reporting period to both the return reserveand the monthly returns for reasonableness.
5.4 Channel Stuffing
Channel stuffing refers to the practice of offering deep discounts, extended
payment terms or other concessions to customers to induce the sale of products
in the current period, when they would not have not been otherwise sold until
later periods, if at all.
Case Illustration
The case against Sunbeam Corporation25 is illustrative. In December 1997,
Sunbeam established a program offering discounts, favourable payment terms,
guaranteed mark-ups and the right of return or exchange on unsold products to
any distributor willing to accept the companys products before year-end. The
company failed to disclose this practice in its quarterly 10Q. As a result, the SEC
20
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
21/92
FIRST DRAFT
charged that the companys 10Q statement was misleading and that the
company had eroded future sales and profit margins by pulling them into the
current period.
Channel stuffing often is indicated by an increase in shipments, which is usually
accompanied by an increase in shipping costs, at or near the end of period.
Where these circumstances occur, the auditor or auditor should (i) inquire
whether the goods were sold at steep discounts and (ii) review customer
contracts and side agreements for unusual discounts in exchange for sales and
rights of return provisions. The auditor should also inquire of sales personnel and
shipping personnel regarding management influence to alter normal sales
channel requirements.
In addition, customers offered deep discounts often purchase inventory in excess
of required needs to take advantage of the reduced prices. This excess,
inventory is often returned by the customer after the close of the period as it
cannot be resold. The auditor thus should consider the amount of returns shortly
after the close of a period as compared to prior periods and margins on sales
recorded immediately before the end of a reporting period.
5.5 Early Delivery of Product
Companies can circumvent the SAB 101 delivery requirement in a variety of
ways including:
Shipping unfinished or incomplete products to customers, or at a time priorto when customers are ready to accept them;
Engaging in soft sales (shipping of products to customers who have not
agreed to purchase); Recognizing the full amount of revenue on contracts where services are
still due to the client, and/or
Recognizing the full amount of revenue on fees collected up front.
Based on the provisions of SAB 101, income should not be recognized under
these circumstances because delivery has not actually occurred.
21
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
22/92
FIRST DRAFT
Customers on the other side of early delivery schemes often return the
unfinished product or demand more completion before payment is rendered.
Analytics that may reveal the existence of an early delivery scheme include:
Comparing returns in the current period and prior periods;
Comparing shipping costs in current period and prior periods; and
Comparing shipping costs as a percentage of revenue in the currentperiod and prior periods.
Careful scrutiny of the sales contract will also assist to detect these schemes.
When must payment be made in relation to delivery? Which party bears the risk
of loss on shipment? The audit or investigative team should then compare these
contract terms with the requirements of SAB 101 and other accounting literature.
The auditor should also make broad inquiries of non-financial personnel such as:
Shipping department personnel:Were shipments earlier than normal for customers?Is inventory stored in the warehouse documented as shipped?Was there inventory shipped to addresses other than customer sites?Were there any adjustments to shipping dates?Whether there exists consigned goods and their location.
Sales force personnel:Are shipments of any products designed to arrive ahead of thecustomers required delivery date?Do sales personnel pick up product and deliver to customers?Are there sales personnel with excessive samples?Do sales personnel have free reign in access to the warehouse?
Warehouse personnel:
- Are there any misstatements in the amount of merchandise thecompany ships or receives?
- Has there been destruction, concealment, predating, or postdating of
shipping and/or inventory documents?- Has there been an acceleration of shipments prior to month or year-
end?
- Have there been shipments to a temporary or holding warehousesprior to final shipment to the customers premises?
- Are there any other unusual, questionable, or improper practices?
22
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
23/92
FIRST DRAFT
Additional audit procedures include:
Comparing the purchase order date with the shipment date;
Determine whether sales personnel are paid commissions based onthe sale of product or upon collection;
Inquiring of outside related business interests of key/sales personnelthat may be suspected in an improper revenue recognition scheme;
Performing public records searches on certain entities and individuals;
Determining whether shipments have been made to these outsidebusiness interests;
Reviewing amounts and trends of shipping costs at or near the end ofa period even to legitimate customers;
Reviewing rate of returns;
Inspecting shipping documents for missing, altered or incorrectinformation; and
Reviewing customer complaint logs or e-mail correspondence for
complaints of shipments of goods prior to the customers readiness toaccept.
5.5.1 Partial Shipments
Many companies will prematurely recognize 100% of revenue on partial or
incomplete shipments of customer orders. The delivery requirement is not met, if
the unshipped portion constitutes a substantial portion of the total deliverable.
Case Illustration
The SECs enforcement action against FastComm Communications Corp is
illustrative.26 In 1999, the SEC charged FastComm with recognizing revenue on
the sale of products that were not fully assembled or functional. The SEC
charged that it was improper because delivery had not yet occurred.
Auditing for partial shipments is similar to auditing for early product delivery. The
auditor must consider:
Numerous returns of incomplete products after the close of period bycustomers seeking the full product;
Large, numerous or unusual transactions occurring shortly before the endof the period;
Examining product details on the invoices;
23
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
24/92
FIRST DRAFT
Is the invoice cut with all products ordered whether shipped or not?
Obtain understanding of drop shipments to customers; if a dropshipment is partial, is the invoice to the customer also partial?
How does the company ensure all drop shipped products areproperly accounted for in the sales invoice process and also in
paying for the goods to the supplier? Reviewing customer complaints regarding lack of completeness in
shipments.
In addition, the auditor will want to inquire of management and sales personnel
regarding the policy and process for billing partially filled orders. A review of the
shipping documents and comparison to the sales journal will also often reveal
what was booked as sales and what was actually shipped. The auditor may also
consider talking to customers or reviewing correspondence from customers to
see if there are numerous complaints from customers regarding partial
shipments.
5.5.2 Soft Sales
Case Illustration
In 1996, the SEC charged Advanced Medical Products employees with
recognizing revenues on soft sales or sales for which the customer had
expressed interest but not actually committed to purchasing. The company
shipped the products to its field representatives, who held them while the
customer decided whether to purchase the product.
The company however, recognized the revenue as of the date of the shipment to
the field representative. Employees withheld sending invoices and monthly
statements to prevent customer complaints resulting from being invoiced forequipment that they had not agreed to purchase.
To detect this scheme, the auditor may wish to review customer complaint logs
and correspondence for complaints of goods shipped prior to the customers
24
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
25/92
FIRST DRAFT
readiness to accept or when the customer was merely making inquiry into the
goods.
5.5.3 Contracts With Multiple Deliverables
Another common scheme occurs when companies ship product or equipment to
customers who are not obligated to pay for such equipment until it is accepted.
Acceptance typically requires a seller to substantially complete or fulfil all the
terms of an arrangement before delivery is deemed to have occurred. Common
customer acceptance provisions included in contracts that, if not satisfied by the
seller, would preclude recognition include:
Sellers obligation to perform additional services subsequent to thedelivery, e.g., product installation and activation;
Product testing prior to payment; and
Training of personnel with respect to produce use.
If a contract requires the seller to provide multiple deliverables or elements, the
delivery is not deemed complete unless substantially all elements or deliverables
are delivered. The sales revenue should be recognized only if inconsequential
elements remain to be delivered.
When assessing whether revenue can be recognized prior to delivery of all
required elements or deliverables, the criteria under GAAP is whether the
undelivered portion is essential to the functionality of the total deliverable.27
SAB 101 enumerates several factors that should be considered in determining
whether remaining performance obligations are substantial or inconsequential.28
Case Illustration
The SEC action against Advanced Medical Products is a classic example of
improperly recognizing revenue on contracts with multiple deliverables.29 Rather
than shipping the product to the customer, Advanced Medical Products shipped
products to companys field representatives, who were responsible for installing
25
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
26/92
FIRST DRAFT
the product and training the customers employees. The SEC charged that the
company incorrectly recognized revenue upon shipment to the field
representatives. This policy contravened GAAP as there was no economic
exchange and risk of loss had not passed to the customer because the products
were still in the control of the company.
In addition to the general indicators listed above, this scheme, which has been
prevalent in the software industry, can possibly be uncovered by confirming with
major customers whether all services have been performed with respect to the
products purchased and received. For companies that deal with distributors of
their product, auditors should obtain an understanding as to whether the
company forces a pre-determined listing of SKUs to its distributors, without an
order from the distributors. If this is the case, there may be a culture of forcing
product out to distributors to meet the numbers. A rash of returns from the
distributors in subsequent months might also reveal this practice. Further
manipulation of the books and records can occur by the entity when these
returns are not processed in a timely fashion.
5.5.4 Up-Front Fees
Some firms will collect up-front fees for services provided over an extended
period, e.g., maintenance contracts. SAB 101 provides that up-front fees should
generally be recognized over the life of the contract or the expected period of
performance.
5.6 Bill and Hold Transactions
Bill and Hold schemes are another common method of bypassing the delivery
requirement. As its name implies, a legitimate sales order is received,
processed, and ready for shipment. The customer however, for whatever
reason, may not be ready, willing, or able to accept delivery of the product at that
26
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
27/92
FIRST DRAFT
particular point in time. The seller holds the goods in its facility or ships them to a
different location, such as a third party warehouse for storage until the customer
is ready to accept shipment.
The seller however, recognizes revenue immediately upon shipment. The
auditor must consider whether the seller has met (or is seeking to circumvent)
enumerated specific criteria established by the SEC30, including whether:
Risk of ownership has passed to the buyer;
Customer has made a fixed commitment to purchase the goods,preferably in written documentation;
Buyer must request that the transaction be on a bill and hold basis;
Buyer must have a substantial business purpose for ordering the goods ona bill and hold basis;
Delivery must be fixed and on a schedule that is reasonable andconsistent with the buyer's business purpose;
Seller must not retain any specific performance obligations under theagreement such that the earning process is not complete;
Ordered goods must be segregated from the seller's inventory and not besubject to being used to fill other orders; and
Product must be complete and ready for shipment.
In addition to the above factors, the SEC also recommends preparers of financialstatements to consider:
The date by which the seller expects payment, and whether the seller hasmodified its normal billing and credit terms for this buyer;
The seller's past experiences with and pattern of bill and hold transactions;
Whether the buyer has the expected risk of loss in the event of a declinein the market value of goods;
Whether the seller's custodial risks are insurable and insured; and
Whether extended procedures are necessary in order to assure that thereare no exceptions to the buyer's commitment to accept and pay for thegoods sold (i.e., that the business reasons for the bill and hold have notintroduced a contingency to the buyer's commitment).31
Auditors coming across agreements that do not meet the above criteria should
be wary of potential bill and hold schemes. Auditors should consider whether:
Bills of lading are signed by a company employee rather than shippingcompany;
27
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
28/92
FIRST DRAFT
Review of shipping documents indicates excessive shipments made towarehouses rather than to a customer's regular address (which couldmean that shipments are made to the sellers warehouses rather thancustomer locations);
Shipping information is missing on invoices;
High shipping costs incurred near the end of the accounting period; Large, numerous or unusual sales transactions occurring shortly before
the end of the period; or
Decrease in current year monthly sales from the prior year that mayindicate the reversal of fraudulent bill and hold transactions in asubsequent period.
When confronted with the above indicators, the auditor should first inquire of
management regarding any bill and hold policies and any customers with bill and
hold arrangements. The auditor should also make inquiry of warehouse
personnel regarding customer inventory being held on the premises in a third
party warehouse, or shipped to another company facility. Finally, the auditor
should inquire of shipping department or finance personnel if they have ever
been asked to falsify or alter shipping documents.
If additional investigation is warranted, the auditor should review the customer
contracts to determine whether they meet the requirements of SAB 101
enumerated above. The auditor should also:
Review underlying shipping documents for accuracy and verify existenceof transactions;
Compare shipping costs to prior periods for reasonableness.
Review warehouse costs and understand the business purpose of allwarehouses owned/used by the company;
Confirm special bill and hold terms with customers directly includingtransfer of risk of loss and liability to pay for the bill and hold goods;
Test reconciliation of goods shipped to goods billed for accuracy;
Select a sample of sales transactions from the sales journal, obtain the
supporting documentation and- Inspect the sales order for approved credit terms;
- Compare the details among the sales orders, shipping documents andsales invoices for inconsistencies;
- Compare the prices on sales invoices against published prices; and
- Re-compute any extensions on sales invoices; and
28
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
29/92
FIRST DRAFT
In conjunction with the physical inventory, tour the facility orwarehouse and inquire of warehouse personnel about any held customerproducts.
Case Illustration
In 2003, the SEC charged Anika Therapeutics with improperly recognizing
approximately $1.5 million in revenue form a bill and hold transaction. A
distributor placed orders with Anika for a total of approximately 15,000 units of a
particular product in April and July 1998. As part of the agreement with the
distributor, Anika invoiced the distributor for the total 15,000 units for over
$500,000 in September 1998 but held the product at Anikas refrigerated facility
until the distributor requested the product, which did not occur until March 1999.However, Anika recorded the revenue for this sale in the quarter ended
September 30, 1998. 32
5.7 Fictitious Revenue Schemes
Schemes to create fictitious revenues, as opposed to prematurely recognize
revenue, cross the line between the potentially defensible and the completely
indefensible.
5.7.1 Fictitious Sales to Existing or Non Existent Customers
A common technique to overstate revenues is to create fictitious orders either for
existing or fictitious customers. These schemes involve the preparation of false
supporting documentation to provide backup to non-existing sales or services
never rendered.
29
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
30/92
FIRST DRAFT
Fictitious revenue schemes can and often will be detected by the same methods
used to detect premature revenue recognition schemes. Auditors should
consider:
Discovery of significant revenue adjustments to revenue at the end of the
reporting period; Unexpected increases in sales by month at period end;
Customers with unknown names or addresses or which have no apparentbusiness relation to the business;
Increased sales accompanied by stagnant or decreasing cost of sales andcorresponding improvement in gross margins;
Improvement in bad debts as a percentage of sales; and/or
Decrease of shipping costs compared with sales.
Fictitious revenue schemes are relatively easy to investigate, once detected.The audit or investigative team should focus on accounting personnel and inquire
whether:
Revenues are recorded outside of the normal invoicing process, orstandard monthly journal entries;
Journal entries have adequate, proper and bona fide supportingdocumentation;
Accounting personnel have been pressured to make or adjust journalentries; and
Accounting or sales personnel have been pressured to create falseinvoices for existing or fictitious customers.
The auditor should also inquire whether sales or shipping personnel have noted
any unusually high sales or shipments to customers with no reasonable
explanation or noted any significant sales or shipments to unfamiliar new
customers.
Auditors should also consider the following detection procedures:
Send confirmations to customers who may be associated with suspicioustransactions;
Perform alternative procedures for confirmations not returned or returnedwith material exceptions such as:
30
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
31/92
FIRST DRAFT
- Including other matters on the confirmations such as anyconsigned inventories held at the customer location or held for thecustomer; and
- Including amount of pending returns on the confirmation as a blankline for the customer to complete.
Review journal entries and supporting documentation, and verify theiraccuracy;
Identify amount of returns in subsequent period;
Look for sales which reverse in the subsequent period; and
Conduct research of publicly available information (e.g., on-line database,manual record and Internet) to verify existence and legitimacy ofcustomers. Follow up physical visits may also be prudent.
Case Illustration
Consider the case of medical device supplier, Boston Japan33, which during fiscal
years 1997-1998 recognized over $75 million dollars of revenue from fraudulentsales. Company sales managers leased commercial warehouses, recorded false
sales to distributors, and shipped the goods to the leased warehouses. The
company masked the fact that the distributors never paid for the goods by issuing
credits to the distributors and then recording false sales of the same goods to
other distributors, without ever moving the goods out of the leased warehouses.
Company employees even recorded sales to distributors that were not involved
in the medical device business, but that had agreed with company sales
managers to collude in the fraud. Some of the false sales were made to
distributors that never resold any of the goods and never paid Boston Japan for
any purported sales. The sales managers and cooperating independent
distributors further colluded to cover up false sales by falsely confirming the
legitimacy of the sales to the companys auditors.
5.7.2 Round Tripping
Round tripping consists of recording transactions that occur between companies
for which there is no economic benefit to either company. For example, a
company that provides a loan to a customer so that the customer can purchase
the product engages in round tripping if the loan was issued with no real prospect
31
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
32/92
FIRST DRAFT
that the customer will ever repay the loan. These transactions are deemed
completed for the sole purpose of inflating revenue and creating the appearance
of strong sales.
Round tripping recently has occurred extensively in the telecommunications and
oil and gas industries. For example, numerous telecommunication companies
boosted their sales volume by exchanging the indefeasible rights of use on their
fiber-optic networks to other telecommunications companies (this practice was
known in the industry as capacity swaps.) These transactions were sometimes
booked as income even though the swaps generated no net cash for either
company.
Case Illustration
In 2002, the SEC began investigating the way telecom giant Qwest
Communications International Inc. and some of its competitors, such as Global
Crossing accounted for sales of fiber-optic capacity and whether it was proper for
the company to recognize the revenue right away immediately.
Qwest sold capacity on their fiber-optic network to carriers and also purchased
capacity from them. Both companies recognized revenue from capacity swaps
and indefeasible rights of use (IRU) that allowed another carrier or company the
unfettered use of the capacity over a long period of time. In some cases, the
amount of the sale and purchase were almost identical. Qwest booked the
revenue from these sales all at one time instead of deferring part of it over many
years. GAAP however, requires companies to record the revenue generated by
an IRU over the time of the contract.
The effect was to boost Qwest's revenue by $1 billion in 2001 and $465 million in
2000.
Since most roundtrip transactions involve counterparties in the same line of
business, an auditor should review a list of the companys significant customers.
32
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
33/92
FIRST DRAFT
If there is a customer in the same line of business, the auditor should scrutinize
the transactions for evidence of any round tripping. The auditor should also
review the vendor list and compare it to the customer list. The same company
appearing on both lists might indicate round tripping. There is always the
possibility of an intermediary being involved in the transaction, so an auditor
should be aware of companies that appear on the two lists but would not be valid
customers or vendors. Round tripping often takes place with related parties so
the auditor should be aware of related party transactions and follow the steps
outlined in Section 5.9.5
5.8 Other Improper Recognition Schemes
5.8.1 Recognizing Revenue On Disputed Claims Against Customers
Reasonable assurance of payment is basic to revenue recognition. Companies
sometimes circumvent this requirement by recognizing the full amount of revenue
even though the customer has for some reason disputed payment. Auditors
should inquire as to all receivables that are in dispute and, if necessary, confer
with legal counsel for the company to assess whether collection of the revenue is
sufficiently certain to be able to be properly recognized.
5.8.2 Holding The Books Open Past the End of a Period
Improperly holding open the books beyond the end of an accounting period can
enable companies to record additional end of period sales that are invoiced and
shipped after the end of a reporting period. While standard cut-off testing will
often discloses these schemes, auditors should be cognizant and skilled in
detecting manipulation of information systems to achieve this result. Direct
inquiry of accounting personnel, billing clerks and warehouse personnel may
assist in determining whether the books are held open past the end of the period.
Computer forensics can also be used to ferret out these schemes.
Case Illustration
33
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
34/92
FIRST DRAFT
In 1993, the management of Platinum Software Corp., was concerned about the
companys "days sales outstanding" ("DSO") the measure of the time a
company takes to collect its receivables. The companys DSO had increased
throughout 1993, in part because it had improperly recognized revenue on
contingent or cancelled license agreements. One of the companys responses to
the increasing DSO was to hold open the companys open for cash received after
period-end. Management recorded checks received by the company in July
1993, on the companys balance sheet as an increase in cash and a reduction in
receivables as of June 30. Holding the books open resulted in a cash
overstatement and associated receivable understatement. Similarly, for the
quarter ending September 1993, management included cash that the company
received for about a week into October, resulting in a cash overstatement and
accounts receivable understatement of $724,000. The same pattern continued
through December 1993, resulting in a cash overstatement and accounts
receivable understatement of $3,463,000. The company was ultimately ordered
to cease and desist in this practice by the SEC.
5.8.3 Recognizing Income on Consignment Sales or Products Shipped forTrial/Evaluation Purposes
SAB 101 prohibits revenue recognition from consignment arrangements until
completion of actual sale. The same criteria apply to products delivered for
demonstration purposes. 34 The reason for this is that in a typical consignment
arrangement, neither title nor the risks and rewards of ownership pass from the
seller to the buyer. Consignment sales and sales shipped under trial or
evaluation purposes are thus merely specific examples of contingent events
which must be satisfied before revenue can be recognized. Particular attention
must be paid to the terms, facts and circumstances of any agreement in which:
The buyer has the right to return the product and
- Buyer does not pay the seller at the time of sale, and the buyer isnot obligated to pay the seller at a specified date or dates;
- Buyer does not pay the seller at the time of sale but rather isobligated to pay at a specified date or dates, and the buyers
34
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
35/92
FIRST DRAFT
obligation to pay is contractually or implicitly excused until the buyerresells the product or subsequently consumes or uses the product;
- Buyers obligation to the seller would be changed (e.g., the sellerwould forgive the obligation or grant a refund) in the event of theftor physical destruction or damage of the product;
-
Buyer acquiring the product for resale does not have economicsubstance apart from that provided by the seller; or
- Seller has significant obligations for future performance to directlybring about resale of the product by the buyer; and
- The product is delivered for demonstration purposes.35
Case Illustration
In the second quarter of 1998, FLIR Systems inappropriately recognized
$225,000 in revenue relating to a consignment sale. The purchase order
submitted by the FLIRs customers stated payment for each system to bemade when a system is sold by [the customer] to an outside customer. Despite
these words, FLIR recognized revenue from this sale, even though no end-user
was ever identified at the time of the purchase order.36
5.8.4 Contract Accounting Schemes
GAAP provides for contract revenue to be recognized using either the
percentage of completion or completed contract method. The percentage ofcompletion method applies only if management can reliably estimate progress
toward the completion of a contract; that is; management must be able to
estimate reliably the total costs required to complete the contract. 37 Conversely,
GAAP requires the "completed contract" method when management cannot
reliably estimate progress toward completion. The completed contract method
requires the company to postpone recognizing revenue until the contractual
obligations have been met.38
The percentage of completion is the method that is most often subject to abuse.
Some companies will use the percentage of completion method notwithstanding
that they do not qualify for that method. Companies can artificially inflate
35
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
36/92
FIRST DRAFT
revenue by increasing the costs incurred toward completion, underestimating the
costs of completion, or overestimating the percentage completed.
The auditor should perform the following procedures when performing an audit or
investigation of contracts:
Select a sample of contracts and confirm:o Original contract price;
o Total approved change orders;
o Total billings and payments;
o Details of claims;
o Back charges or disputes; and
o Estimated completion date.
Ensure that all incurred costs are supported with adequate documentation
detailing the nature and amount of expense; Audit estimated costs to complete by reviewing estimates and comparing
with actual costs incurred after the balance sheet date;
Ensure that all estimated costs to complete the contract should besupported by reasonable assumptions;
Ensure that all contracts are approved by appropriate personnel;
Review unapproved change orders;
Identify unique contracts and retest the estimates of cost and progress onthe contract;
Test contract costs to ensure costs are matched with appropriatecontracts and costs are not shifted from unprofitable contracts to profitable
ones; Ensure that losses are recorded as incurred;
Review all disputes and claims;
Visit the construction contract site to view the progress of a contract;and/or
Interview project managers, subcontractors, engineering and technicalpersonnel to get additional information on the progress of an engagementand the assumptions behind the contract.
Case Illustration
In 1996, the SEC charged 3Net Systems with improperly recognizing over $1
million of revenue in both 1991 and 1992, by misrepresenting to its outside
auditors the degree to which certain work had been completed under certain
contracts with existing customers. In fact, 3Net had not completed any of the
contracts, and in addition, had not even determined the costs to complete.
36
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
37/92
FIRST DRAFT
Further, 3Net had no other means of reliably estimating progress toward
completion for these contracts, as it lacked the systems necessary to estimate
and track progress on their development. Because 3Net could not reliably
estimate progress toward completion, the contracts in question did not qualify for
the percentage of completion method. The SEC charged 3Net should have used
the completed contract method for the contracts. Had it done so, 3Net would not
have reported revenue in fiscal 1991 because it completed none of these
contracts by the end of fiscal 1991.39
5.8.5 Sham Related Party Transactions
Sham related party transactions are transactions between related parties where
either little or no consideration is given for the product or service. The existence
of related party transactions cuts to the very first criteria of SAB 101 that there be
persuasive evidence of an arms length arrangement. Sales transactions should
stem from express or implied contracts and represent exchanges between
independent parties at arms-length prices and terms. Accordingly, arms-length
transactions cannot be achieved in those situations where the parties are related
or where one party can exercise substantial control over the other.
Related party transactions carry the presumption that one or both parties have
received a benefit that they would not have otherwise received had the
transactions been truly arms length. Related party schemes can take place in
the context of any of the schemes listed in this chapter.
Transactions between related parties are often difficult to audit as these
transactions are not always accounted for in a manner that communicates their
substance and effect with transparency. The possibility of collusion always exists
given that the parties are, by definition, related. Internal controls, moreover,
might not identify the transactions as involving related parties.
An auditor may encounter related parties that are known by some members of
the company; however, the relationships are not properly disclosed in the books
37
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
38/92
FIRST DRAFT
and records. The auditor should inquire as to outside business interests and
then try to determine whether they are properly disclosed, and the volume of
transactions, if any, that are occurring between the entities.
Auditors should also focus on the relationship and identity of the other party to
the transaction and whether the transaction emphasizes form over substance.
Common indicators of such related party, sham transactions include but are not
limited to:
Borrowing or lending on an interest-free basis or at a rate of interestsignificantly above or below market rates;
Selling real estate at prices that differ significantly from appraised value;
Exchanging property for similar property in a non-monetary transaction;
Loans with no scheduled terms for when or how the funds will be repaid. 40
Loans with accruing interest differing significantly from market rates;
Loans to parties lacking the capacity to repay;
Loans advanced for valid business purpose and later written off asuncollectible;41
Non-recourse loans to shareholders;
Agreements requiring one party to pay the expenses on the others behalf;
Round tripping sales arrangements (seller has concurrent obligation topurchase from the buyer);
Business arrangements where the entity pays or receives payments of
amounts at other than market values; Failure to adequately disclose the nature and amounts of related party
relationships and transactions as required by GAAP42;
Consulting arrangements with directors, officers or other members ofmanagement;
Land sales and other transactions with buyers of marginal credit risk;
Monies transferred to or from the company from a related party for goodsor services that were never rendered;
Goods purchased or sent to another party at less than cost;
Material receivables or payables from to or from related parties such asofficers, directors and other employees;43
Discovery of a previously undisclosed related party;
Large, unusual transactions with one or a few other parties on or at periodend; and
Sales to high-risk jurisdictions or jurisdictions where the entity would notbe expected to conduct business.
.
38
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
39/92
FIRST DRAFT
If related party transactions are detected or suspected, the auditor should
consider further inquiry, including:
Conducting public records searches/background investigations oncustomers, suppliers and other individuals to identify related parties and
confirm legitimacy of business; Performing data mining to determine whether transactions appear on
computerized files;
Performing document review of identified transactions to obtain additionalinformation for further inquiry;
Searching for unusual or complex transactions occurring close to the endof a reporting period;
Searching for significant bank accounting or operations for which there isno apparent business purpose;
Reviewing the nature and extent of business transacted with majorsuppliers, customers, borrowers and lenders to look for previously
undisclosed relationships; Reviewing confirmations of loans receivable and payable for indications of
guarantees;
Performing alternative procedures if confirmations are not returned orreturned with material exceptions;
Reviewing material cash disbursements, advances and investments todetermine if the company is funding a related entity;
Testing related party sales to supporting documentation (i.e., contract andsales order) to ensure appropriately recorded;
Discussing with counsel, prior auditors and other service providers theextent of their knowledge of parties to material transactions; and
Inquiring about side agreements with related parties for right of return orcontract cancellation without recourse
6. Asset Overstatement/Liability Understatement Schemes
Improper reporting of assets is another way for companies to overstate earnings.
A direct relationship exists between overstatement of assets/understatement of
liabilities on the balance sheet and the inflation of earnings. The WorldCom
scandal for example, exemplifies how expenses improperly capitalized as assets
on the balance sheet can serve to inflate income. In many cases, perpetrators
are looking for a place on the balance sheet to place the debit. Overstating an
asset or understating a liability usually occurs with this scheme. Accounts such
39
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
40/92
FIRST DRAFT
as inter-company and foreign currency exchange gain/loss should not be
overlooked as potential places to hide the debit.
Common asset overstatement fraud schemes include:
Creating fictitious assets;
Manipulating balances of legitimate assets with the intent to overstatevalue;
Understating liabilities or expenses, including failing to record (ordeliberately under estimating) accrued expenses, environmental litigationliabilities and other business problems;
Misstating inter-company expenses; and
Manipulating foreign currency exchanges.
An auditor can often become alert to the possibility of fictitious or over inflated
assets by inquiring as to whether the entity intends to secure financing. If the
answer is yes and if that financing is contingent on the value of particular assets
such as receivables or inventory, that should lead the auditor to ask more
questions and perform additional procedures to verify the existence, and location
and value of these assets. As with certain other schemes, the auditor can most
often detect these schemes by observing the companys operations and inquiring
as to unusual items.
6.1 Inventory Schemes
The original COSO Report found that fraudulent asset valuations comprised
nearly half of the cases of financial fraud statements. Misstatements of
inventory, in turn, comprised the majority of asset valuation frauds.
Generally, when inventory is sold, the amounts are transferred to cost of goods
sold and included in the income statement as a direct reduction of sales. An
overvaluation of ending inventory will understate cost of goods sold and in turn,
overstate net income.
Inventory schemes can generally fall into three categories:
40
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
41/92
FIRST DRAFT
Artificially inflating the quantity of inventory on hand;
Inflating the value of inventory by- Postponing write-downs for obsolescence);- Manipulating unit of measurement to inflate value;- Under-reporting reserves for obsolete inventory, especially in
industries where products are being updated or have a short shelflife; and
- Changing between inventory reporting methods (average costing,last invoice price, LIFO, FIFO, etc.);
Fraudulent or improper inventory capitalization.
Following are indicators an auditor can look for to detect possible inventory
manipulation:
A gross profit margin which is higher than expected;
Inventory that increases faster than sales;
Inventory turnover that decreases from one period to the next;
Shipping costs that decrease as a percentage of inventory;
Inventory as a percentage of total assets that rise faster than expected;
Decreasing cost of sales as a percentage of sales;
Cost of goods sold per the books that do not agree with the company's taxreturn;
Falling shipping costs while total inventory or cost of sales have increased;and
Monthly trend analyses that indicate spikes in inventory balances nearyear-end.
6.1.1 Inflating Inventory Quantity (Fictitious Inventory)
The simplest way to overstate inventory is to add fictitious items to inventory.
Companies can accomplish this by creating fake or fictitious:
Journal entries;
Shipping and receiving reports;
Purchase orders; and
Quantities on cycle counts or physical counts.
Some companies even go as far as maintaining empty boxes in a warehouse.
The most effective way for the auditor or auditor to confirm the inventory balance
is physically to observe the clients inventory, particularly at times when an
inventory count is being performed. In fact, Generally Accepted Auditing
41
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
42/92
FIRST DRAFT
Standards (GAAS) require auditors to physically observe, test, and inquire as to
the amount of inventory on hand and to satisfy themselves with respect to the
methods of inventory taking and the measure of reliance placed upon the clients
representations about the quantities and physical condition of inventories.44
When the auditor cannot be satisfied as to the inventories he or she must
physically count the inventory and test transactions in that account.45 Where
inventory is stored outside the company site, such as public warehouses,
auditors should conduct additional procedures to confirm balance.
Case Illustration
Fraud history is filled with names of companies made famous or infamous by
fictitious inventory schemes including McKesson and Robbins, ZZZ Best and
Crazy Eddie. The most famous bogus inventory fraud perhaps is the Salad Oil
Swindle of the 1960s. In that case, management of the company rented
petroleum tanks and filled them with seawater. The company was able to
convince the auditors that the tanks contained over $100 million in vegetable oil
because the oil rose to the top of banks. In fact, the little oil that was present was
pumped from one tank to the next depending on the companys advance
knowledge of the auditors inventory observation plan.46
The auditor should look for the following operational factors may arouse
suspicions of fictitious inventory:
Inventory that cannot be easily physically inspected;
Unsupported inventory, cost of sales or accounts payable journal entries;
Unusual or suspicious shipping and receiving reports;
Unusual or suspicious purchase orders;
Large test count differences;
Inventory that does not appear to have been used for some time or that isstored in unusual locations;
Large quantities of high cost items in summarized inventory;
Unclear or ineffective cut-off procedures or inclusions in inventory ofmerchandise already sold or for which purchases are not recorded;
Adjusting entries which have increased inventory over time;
Material reversing entries to the inventory account after the close of theaccounting period;
42
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
43/92
FIRST DRAFT
Inventory that is not subject to a physical count at year end;
Improper or accidental sales that are reversed and included in inventorybut not counted in physical observation (for example a companyaccidentally delivers a specifics product to a customer, tells the customerit was a mistake and requests the customer to send the product back);
and Excessive inter-company and interplant movement of inventory with little
or no related controls or documentation.
Even physical observation however, is not fail-proof. Even when an auditor can
observe inventory, a company can still perpetrate fraud by:
Following the auditor during the course of the count and adding fictitiousinventory to the items not tested;
Obtaining advance notice of the timing and location of the inventorycounts thereby permitting the company to conceal shortages at locations
not visited; Stacking empty containers at the warehouse which are not checked during
the count;
Entering additional quantities on count sheets, cards, scanners, etc. thatdo not exist or adding a digit in front of the actual count;
Falsifying shipping documents to show that inventory is in transit from onecompany location to another;
Falsifying documents to show that inventory is located at a publicwarehouse or other location not controlled by the company;
Including consigned items as part of the inventory count; and
Including items being held for customers as part of the inventory count.
To deter management from inflating inventory during physical counts, the auditor
should consider:
Reviewing company policy for inventory counts (frequency andprocedures);
Inquiring of management and internal audit as to the dollar adjustment ofthe book to physical counts and the reasons for the significant differences;
Inquiring as to whether all inventory shrinkages have been reported;
Inquiring and observe inventory at third-party locations/off-site storage
locations; Observing a physical inventory unannounced; and
Conducting physical inventories for multi locations all on the same date.
6.1.2 Inflating Inventory Value
GAAP requires that inventory be reported at the lower of replacement cost or
market value (i.e., current replacement cost.)47 Companies inflate inventory value
43
-
8/3/2019 Frank-Common Financial Fraud Schemes 7May 03v1
44/92
FIRST DRAFT
for a variety of reasons other than to boost earnings. For instance, a common
reason to inflate the value of inventory is to obtain some form of financing using
the inventory as collateral. The higher the value of the inventory, the more the
company will be able to obtain in the form of financing.
Inflating inventory value achieves the same impact on earnings as manipulating
the physical count. Management can accomplish this simply by creating false
journal entries designed to increase the balance in the inventory account.
Another common way to inflate inventory value is to delay the write-down of
obsolete or slow moving inventory, since a write down would require a charge
against earnings.
Auditors thus should be fully aware of the items comprising inventory and their
life cycles, particularly as it relates to that industry. In addition, during the
physical observation of the inventory, the auditor must look for and inquire about
older items that appear to be obsolete. Few or no write-downs to market or no
provisions for obsolescence in industries where there have been changes in
product lines or technology or rapid declines in sales or markets warrant further
investigation as to why the company has not accounted for such declines even
when the inventory in question may be relatively new.
When a potential inventory valuation problem is detected or suspected, the
auditor should consider:
Inquiring of accounting personnel as to the companys inventory pricingpolicy and how they identify net realizable value mark-downs;
Inquiring of management, accounting and finance personnel as towhether the company has shown historical patterns in the past of over
valuation (i.e., prior year write down which became value impaired); Inquiring of accounting personnel as to whether they have ever been
requested to delay inventory write downs due to obsolescence etc.;
Touring the warehouse looking for items which appear to be old orobsolete and asking warehouse personnel if stock is slow moving,damaged or obsolete;
Inquiring of accounting personnel if they are aware of any items beingsold below cost; an