FP6-2004-27020 October 22, 2008eCom eGov '081 Marek Skokan 1, Tomáš Sabol 1, Marián Mach 1 Karol...

FP6-2004-27020

October 22, 2008 eCom eGov '08 1

Marek Skokan1, Tomáš Sabol 1, Marián Mach 1 Karol Furdík 2

Integration of governmental services in semantically described processes in the

Access-eGov system

1) Technical University of Košice,

2) InterSoft, a.s.


Fact sheet on Access-eGov project

• FP6-2004-27020 „Access to e-Government Services Employing Semantic Technologies“

• Duration: 1 January 2006 – 31 December 2008

• Effort: 410 person-months• Overall budget: 2 279 243 EUR• EC Contribution: 1 983 000 EUR• Coordinator: Technical University Kosice, SK • Consortium: 11 partners, 5 countries

(Slovakia, Germany, Greece, Poland, Egypt)• Pilot applications: SK, PL, Germany, Egypt• Home page: www.accessegov.org


Research Partners

User Partners

Coordinator

University of Regensburg

Germany

German University in CairoEgypt

InterSoft, a.s.Slovakia

EMAX S.A Poland e-ISOTIS

Greece

State Government of Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

City Hall of GliwicePoland

Municipality of Michalovce Slovakia

Cities on Internet AssociationPoland

Kosice Self-Governing RegionSlovakia

TU Kosice,

Slovakia

PROJECT PARTNERS


Faced problem (As-is situation)

?

Access-eGov objective

• Main goal: To develop and validate a platform for composition of governmental services into complex process definitions (life events) enabling semantic interoperability of particular eGov services.



Proposed solution - to be situation

• The user accesses Access-eGov site • He obtains information of service(s) relevant for his case• He understands the procedure (services in a structured

workflow) and knows which institution to contact, which forms to fill, and which documents to submit

• He receives support to follow the procedure (Personal assitant)

Research challenges

• Integration and interoperability of existing services

• Solution: employment of semantic technologies• Semantic integration - the meaning of information is made

machine-readable and processed• Requirement: public administrations need to annotate the

semantics of the information they provide

• Research goals and challenges:• Improve accessibility and connectivity of government services

for users (ease to find the relevant services only)• Simplify the usage of services for users:

Creating an integrated hybrid scenario by combining relevant atomic services

Providing guidance to users while implementing the scenario

• Provide platform, tools, and methodology that enables to transform existing services to be semantically interoperable


Access-eGov outcomes

• Access-eGov platform • It enables registration, semantic discovery and

composition of PA services• Annotation tool (AT) - system interface for PA users

• AT enables easy registration of PA services into the AeG system

• Personal Assistent Client (PAC) – system interface for citizens • PAC assists in the process of discovery, composition and

execution of relevant PA services into user scenarios• Methodology and ontologies

• Methodology and ontologies serve to transform existing services into semantically interoperable

• Pilot applications• 3 pilot application and 1 test lab



Annotation Tool - Principles

• Dedicated for public administration employees, no special knowledge on semantic technologies required.

• Web application, JSF technology (Browser capable of javascript required). • Interface is based on description of classes in WSML.

• Features, functionality provided:• Service templates: Predefined set of the functional properties and

workflow,• Annotation: Specification of concrete values for non functional

properties of services,• User management, based on roles: Administrators, Annotators,

Publishers, Viewers.• Web grabbing: possibility to include and annotate a content from

existing web pages.

Annotation tool


Example: List of Instances Example: Annotation of a new service


Personal Assistant Client - Principles

• Dedicated for users - citizens, businesses.• Provides browsing, discovery, and execution of services

according to a specified life event or goal.• Web application, JSF technology.

• Interface is dynamically created from the WSML descriptions and is customized by the user’s answers during the processing.

• Features, functionality provided:• Navigation in the structure of life events, goals, and services,

based on the customization data entered by the users. Automatic resolving of sub-goals, according to the user’s answers.

• Integration of traditional, electronic, and web services into a single platform.

• Direct invocation of web services (via standardized WS interface).• Description: The client provides a textual description of the

services that can not be directly invoked (i.e. traditional services).

Model of Life event in Personal Assistant Client


Model of Life event as AeG ontology


Service description in Personal Assistant Client



Access-eGov project: Pilot applications

• Slovakia: Land-use planning and processing a request for a building permit.

• Poland: Establishing an enterprise - the process of company registration.

• Germany: An upgrade and field test based on the existing good practice “Zustaendigkeitsfinder” ("Responsibility Finder"), by introducing a semantic layer (securing semantic interoperability between national and local governments). Use-case: Getting married.

• Egypt (German University of Cairo): Usability testing from outside EU.


Evaluation of the first trial (1)

Annotation Tool

• Instruments used for collecting the feedback• Internal testing by developers• Testing by user partners• Feedback from annotators during the training sessions• Think-aloud session (GUC)• Accessibility and usability evaluation (e-Isotis)

• Results in summary• Use of AT was effective• Using the component without training is possible• Usability, efficiency and performance need to be improved

• Specifications for revision of AT regarding• Usability • Performance and efficiency• Annotation of existing web contents


Evaluation of the first trial (2)

Personal Assistant Client

• Instruments used for collecting the feedback• Internal tests of developers and user partners using TRAC (iterative tests)• Think-aloud sessions (SHG)• Workshop with PA‘s and IT experts (SHG)• Public testing with test scripts and feedback through email and interviews• Online and/or internal questionnaires• Accessibility and usability evaluation (e-Isotis)

• Results in summary• Use of PAC was (mostly) effective• Usability, navigation structure, and information quality need to be improved

• Specifications for revision of PAC regarding• Information quality • Navigation and structure of the services (step-by-step guide preferred)• Usability, incl. leading user through the process, labels of buttons, links, and

contextual help.


Expected Benefits of Access-eGov solution

• Benefits for service consumers:• Improved identification of services• Support for accessing services• User tailored service composition• Combining electronic and “traditional” services• Guidance through life event scenario

• Benefits for service providers:• Easy registration of services

FP6-2004-27020 October 22, 2008eCom eGov '081 Marek Skokan 1, Tomáš Sabol 1, Marián Mach 1 Karol...

Documents

Transcript of FP6-2004-27020 October 22, 2008eCom eGov '081 Marek Skokan 1, Tomáš Sabol 1, Marián Mach 1 Karol...