Fourth Quarter 2017 Social Weather Survey: Net ... · NG LANGIS SA PRESYO NITO (Ensuring that oil...

4th Quarter 2017 Social Weather Survey

SWS MEDIA RELEASE

17 January 2018, page 1 of 21

52 Malingap St., Sikatuna Village, Quezon City

Website: www.sws.org.ph

Tel: 924-4456, 924-4465

Fax: 920-2181

pr20180117 - Satisfaction with National Admin Overall and on Issues (media release).docx

Fourth Quarter 2017 Social Weather Survey:

Net satisfaction rating of the Duterte National Administration

rises to record-high “Excellent” +70

• Excellent in Mindanao and NCR; Very Good in Balance Luzon and Visayas

• Very Good on 5, Good on 11, and Moderate on 2 subjects

• Net rating improves on 7 subjects, declines on 1 subject, steady on others

Social Weather Stations

The Fourth Quarter 2017 Social Weather Survey, done on December 8-16, 2017, found 79% of

adult Filipinos satisfied, 12% neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and 9% dissatisfied with the general

performance of the current National Administration, for a new record-high net satisfaction rating of +70

(% satisfied minus % dissatisfied), classified by SWS as excellent [Chart 1; Table 1].

This is a 12-point rise, and up by one grade, from the very good +58 (71% satisfied, 13%

dissatisfied) in September 2017.

This surpassed the previous record of very good +66 achieved in June 2013 (Noynoy Aquino

Administration), and in September 2016 and March 2017 (Duterte Administration).

Excellent in Mindanao and NCR; Very Good in Balance Luzon and Visayas

The 12-point gain in the Duterte Administration’s general net satisfaction rating between

September to December 2017 was due to new record-high net satisfaction scores achieved in Mindanao,

NCR, and Balance Luzon, combined with a steady score in the Visayas.

The National Administration’s net rating stayed excellent in Mindanao, at a new record-high +87

in December 2017, up by 13 points from +74 in September 2017. This surpassed the previous Mindanao

record of +81 in September 2016 [Chart 2; Table 2].

It rose by one grade from very good to excellent in NCR, at a new record-high +71 in December,

up by 20 points from +51 in September. This surpassed the previous NCR record of +67 in June 2017.

It stayed very good in Balance Luzon, at a new record-high +67 in December, up by 15 points

from +52 in September. This surpassed the previous Balance Luzon record of +63 in June 2017.

It stayed very good in the Visayas, at +57 in December, similar to the net rating in September.

http://www.sws.org.ph/


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Excellent in class D; Very Good in classes E and ABC

The National Administration’s net satisfaction rating rose by one grade from very good to excellent

in class D or the masa, at a new record-high +71 in December, 11 points higher than +60 in September.

This surpassed the previous class D record of +68 in September 2016 [Chart 3; Table 3].

It rose by one grade from good to very good in class E, at +66 in December, 20 points higher than

+46 in September.

It stayed very good in classes ABC, at +62 in December, 2 points higher than +60 in September.

Double-digit increases in the National Administration’s net satisfaction rating occurred among

men, among the 35 year olds and above, and among non-elementary school graduates, elementary school

graduates, and college graduates [Table 4].

The SWS terminology for net satisfaction ratings is as follows: +70 and above, “excellent”; +50

to +69, “very good”; +30 to +49, “good”; +10 to +29, “moderate”, +9 to –9, “neutral”; –10 to –29,

“poor”; –30 to –49, “bad”; –50 to –69, “very bad”; –70 and below, “execrable.”

Very Good on 5, Good on 11, and Moderate on 2 subjects

Out of 18 specific performance subjects rated, the net satisfaction ratings of the Duterte

administration were very good on 5 subjects, good on 11 subjects, and moderate on 2 subjects. SWS calls

this its Governance Report Card [Tables 5 and 6].

The net rating of the National Administration was very good on: Fighting terrorism (+67), Helping

the poor (+66), Building and maintenance of public works like roads and bridges (+59), Foreign relations

(+55), and Providing jobs (+50) [Charts 4 to 8].

It was good on: Reconciling with Muslim rebels (+48), Telling the truth to the people (+47),

Defending the country's territorial rights (+46), Protecting human rights (+45), Reconciling with

communist rebels (+43), Fighting crimes (+43), Eradicating graft and corruption (+42), Ensuring an

efficient public transportation system (+42), Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry (+33), Solving

the problem of extra judicial killings or EJK (+30), and Ensuring that oil companies do not take advantage

of oil prices (+30) [Charts 9 to 19].

It was moderate on: Fighting inflation (+24) and Resolving the traffic problem (+23) [Charts 20

and 21].

National Administration’s net rating improves on 7 subjects, declines on 1, steady on others

The December 2017 survey found the National Administration’s net rating improved on 7 specific

subjects, declined on 1 specific subject, and steady on others, compared to when they were last surveyed.


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


The National Administration’s net rating rose to very good on three specific subjects:

The very good +67 on Fighting terrorism was 20 points above the good +47 in September 2017.

The very good +59 on Building and maintenance of public works like roads and bridges was 19

points above the good +40 in December 2000.

The very good +55 on Foreign relations was 15 points above the good +40 in September 2017.

It stayed very good on two specific subjects.

The very good +66 on Helping the poor hardly changed from the very good +67 in September

2017.

The very good +50 on Providing jobs was identical to the net figure in September 2017.

The National Administration’s net rating improved to good on four specific subjects.

The good +47 on Telling the truth to the people was 32 points above the moderate +15 in March

2015.

The good +33 on Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry was 4 points above the moderate

+29 in September 2017.

The good +30 on Solving the problem of extra judicial killings or EJK was 8 points above the

moderate +22 in September 2017.

The good +30 on Ensuring that oil companies do not take advantage of oil prices was 25 points

higher than the neutral +5 in September 2015.

It stayed good on six specific subjects.

The good +48 on Reconciling with Muslim rebels was 10 points above the good +38 in September

2017.

The good +45 on Protecting human rights hardly changed from the good +46 in September 2017.

The good +43 on Reconciling with communist rebels was 8 points above the good +35 in

September 2017.

The good +43 on Fighting crimes was 13 points above the good +30 in September 2017.

The good +42 on Eradicating graft and corruption was 7 points higher than the good +35 in

September 2017.

The good +42 was 6 points below the good +48 in December 2016.

However, it declined to good +46 on Defending the country's territorial rights, 6 points below the

very good +52 in September 2017.

The National Administration’s net rating stayed moderate on two specific subjects.


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


The moderate +24 on Fighting inflation hardly changed from the moderate +21 in September

2017.

The moderate +23 on Resolving the traffic problem was 1 point higher than the moderate +22 in

September 2017.

Survey background

The December 2017 Social Weather Survey was conducted from December 8-16, 2017 using face-

to-face interviews of 1,200 adults (18 years old and above) nationwide: 300 each in Metro Manila, Balance

Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao (sampling error margins of ±3% for national percentages, and ±6% each

for Metro Manila, Balance Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao).

The area estimates were weighted by Philippine Statistics Authority medium-population

projections for 2017 to obtain the national estimates.

The Social Weather Survey items on public satisfaction with the general performance of the

National Administration, and its performance on specific subjects, are non-commissioned. These items

were included on SWS's own initiative and released as a public service.

The satisfaction rating of the general performance of the National Administration is based on a

single question, and is not an average of answers to separate questions on specific subjects. The general

rating is repeated every quarter, whereas only a core of the specific subject-ratings are repeated. Subjects

are included or excluded depending on their contemporary salience.

The survey question on public satisfaction with the overall performance of the national

administration is as follows: “Sa pangkalahatan, gaano po kayo nasisiyahan o hindi nasisiyahan sa

kasalukuyang administrasyong nasyonal? Kayo po ba ay LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO

NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUNG NASISIYAHAN O HINDI, MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, o

LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN? [On the overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present

national administration? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF

SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, or VERY DISSATISFIED?]”

For the specific subjects, the survey questions are as follows: “GAANO PO KAYO NASISIYAHAN

O HINDI NASISIYAHAN SA PAMAMALAKAD NG KASALUKUYANG ADMINISTRASYONG

NASYONAL TUNGKOL SA (PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES)? MASASABI BA NINYONG KAYO AY

LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUNG NASISIYAHAN O HINDI,

MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, O LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN? PAKISAGOT PO ANG MGA

ITO SA PAMAMAGITAN NG PAGLALAGAY NG BAWAT KARD SA NAAANGKOP NA LUGAR SA


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


RATING BOARD NA ITO. (SHUFFLE CARD) [How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present

national administration’s performance in (programs or activities)? Would you say that you are VERY

SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT

DISSATISFIED, or VERY DISSATISFIED? You may indicate your answers by placing each card on the

appropriate box on this rating board. (SHUFFLE CARD)]”

1. PAGLABAN SA TERORISMO (Fighting terrorism)

2. PAKIKIPAG-UGNAYAN SA MGA REBELDENG MUSLIM UPANG ANG MGA ITO AY

MAGBALIK-LOOB SA PAMAHALAAN (Reconciliation with Muslim rebels)

3. PAKIKIPAG-UGNAYAN SA MGA REBELDENG KOMUNISTA UPANG ANG MGA ITO AY

MAGBALIK-LOOB SA PAMAHALAAN (Reconciliation with communist rebels)

4. PAGTUTULONG SA MGA MAHIHIRAP (Helping the poor)

5. PAGLALABAN SA PAGTAAS NG PRESYO (Fighting inflation)

6. PANINIGURO NA WALANG PAMILYANG KAILANMAN AY MAGUGUTOM AT WALANG

MAKAIN (Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry and have nothing to eat)

7. PAGBIBIGAY NG HANAPBUHAY (Providing jobs)

8. PAGRESOLBA NG PROBLEMA SA TRAFFIC (Resolving the traffic problem)

9. PAKIKIPAG-UGNAYAN SA IBANG BANSA (Foreign relations)

10. PAGPUPUKSA NG KATIWALIAN AT PANGUNGURAKOT SA GOBYERNO (Eradicating

graft and corruption in government)

11. PANINIGURO NA HINDI NAGSASAMANTALA ANG MGA KUMPANYANG NAGBEBENTA

NG LANGIS SA PRESYO NITO (Ensuring that oil companies do not take advantage of oil

prices)

12. PAGTATANGGOL SA KARAPATAN NG BANSA SA TERITORYONG DAGAT NITO

(Defending the country's rights to its territorial seas)

13. PANINIGURONG MAAYOS ANG SISTEMA NG PAMPUBLIKONG TRANSPORTASYON

(Ensuring an efficient public transportation system)

14. PAGPAPAGAWA AT PAGSASAAYOS NG MGA KALSADA, TULAY AT IBA PANG

IMPRASTRUKTURA (Building and maintenance of public works like roads and bridges)

15. PAGSASABI NG KATOTOHANAN SA MGA TAO (Telling the truth to the people)

16. PAGLALABAN SA MGA KRIMENG BUMIBIKTIMA SA ORDINARYONG MAMAMAYAN

TULAD NG PAGPATAY, HOLDAP, PAGNANAKAW, PANANAKIT NA PISIKAL, ATBP.

(Fighting crimes that victimize ordinary citizens, like killings, holdups, robberies, physical

violence, etc.)

17. PAGLUTAS NG PROBLEMA NG “EXTRAJUDICIAL KILLINGS” O EJK (Solving the

problem of “Extrajudicial Killings” or EJK)

18. PAGTATANGGOL SA KARAPATANG PANTAO (Protection of human rights)


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


SWS terminology for Net Satisfaction Ratings: +70 and above, "excellent"; +50 to +69, "very

good"; +30 to +49, "good"; +10 to +29, "moderate", +9 to –9, "neutral"; –10 to –29, "poor"; –30 to –

49, "bad"; –50 to –69, "very bad"; –70 and below, "execrable"]. A single-digit net satisfaction is

considered not significantly different from zero. SWS considers the movement from one classification to

another as either an "upgrade" or "downgrade".

SWS employs its own staff for questionnaire design, sampling, fieldwork, data-processing, and

analysis, and does not outsource any of its survey operations. This report was prepared by Gianne Sheena

S. Sabio.

#


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 1

Table 1

Fourth Quarter 2017 Social Weather Report December 8-16, 2017 National Survey

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

NET* SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: PHILIPPINES, FEB 1989 – DEC 2017

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

-50

Net*

Satisfaction

C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

+70

E

1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017


* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused responses. Q: Sa pangkalahatan, gaano po kayo nasisiyahan o hindi nasisiyahan sa kasalukuyang administrasyong nasyonal? (SHOWCARD) LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUNG NASISIYAHAN O HINDI, MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN

C. AQUINOFEB 89 +23SEP 89 +14APR 90 +17NOV 90 -10JUL 91 - 1NOV 91 + 1FEB 92 - 2APR 92 - 5

RAMOSSEP 92 +32DEC 92 +30APR 93 +24JUL 93 +31SEP 93 +14DEC 93 +24APR 94 +15AUG 94 +14NOV 94 +16DEC 94 +17MAR 95 +10JUN 95 + 6OCT 95 -18DEC 95 - 3APR 96 0JUN 96 +11

NET* SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE

OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: PHILIPPINESRAMOS (cont.)

SEP 96 +10DEC 96 - 1APR 97 +28JUN 97 +31SEP 97 + 5DEC 97 +20FEB 98 + 8MAR 98 + 9

ESTRADASEP 98 +19NOV 98 +36MAR 99 +34JUN 99 +28OCT 99 + 2DEC 99 - 8MAR 00 + 6JUL 00 +24SEP 00 +10DEC 00 + 2

ARROYOMAR 01 +27JUL 01 +12SEP 01 + 8NOV 01 +27MAR 02 +12

ARROYO (cont.)MAY 02 0SEP 02 +15NOV 02 +13MAR 03 - 3JUN 03 +23SEP 03 - 6NOV 03 +3MAR 04 +14AUG 04 +15DEC 04 + 3MAR 05 - 6MAY 05 -13AUG 05 -11DEC 05 -15MAR 06 -15JUN 06 + 2SEP 06 - 3NOV 06 - 2FEB 07 - 3SEP 07 + 9DEC 07 -11MAR 08 -19JUN 08 -21SEP 08 -4DEC 08 -1FEB 09 -19

ARROYO (cont.)JUN 09 -11SEP 09 -20DEC 09 -22MAR 10 -45

B. AQUINOSEP 10 +64NOV 10 +64MAR 11 +46JUN 11 +45SEP 11 +56DEC 11 +56MAR 12 +46MAY 12 +44AUG 12 +62DEC 12 +57MAR 13 +53JUN 13 +66SEP 13 +56DEC 13 +51MAR 14 +45JUN 14 +29SEP 14 +35DEC 14 +34MAR 15 +19JUN 15 +31

B. AQUINO (cont.)SEP 15 +37DEC 15 +39APR 16 +35JUN 16 +50

DUTERTESEP 16 +66DEC 16 +61MAR 17 +66JUN 17 +64SEP 17 +58DEC 17 +70


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 2

Table 2



NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA, FEB 1989 – DEC 2017


+10

+30

+50

+70

+90

-10

-30

-50

NCR: +71BAL LUZ: +67VIS: +57

MIN: +87


Net*

Satisfaction

1989 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017


C. AQUINOFEB 89 - 2 +22 +28 +37SEP 89 + 7 + 2 +25 +31APR 90 - 4 +24 +18 +15NOV 90 -42 -12 + 3 + 3JUL 91 -28 - 4 +14 + 5NOV 91 -23 0 +13 + 4FEB 92 -18 - 4 + 3 + 7APR 92 -13 - 2 - 2 - 8

RAMOSSEP 92 +35 +34 +23 +34DEC 92 +12 +34 +31 +35APR 93 + 5 +31 +18 +26JUL 93 0 +34 +28 +46SEP 93 0 +15 +16 +22DEC 93 +15 +30 +12 +29APR 94 +13 +19 + 4 +19AUG 94 + 9 +15 +10 +16NOV 94 + 4 +24 +10 +16DEC 94 + 8 +19 +19 +14MAR 95 -17 +19 - 2 +20JUN 95 - 4 +14 - 5 + 9OCT 95 -22 -22 -18 - 9DEC 95 -19 - 3 0 + 7APR 96 -15 + 2 - 9 +13

NCR LUZ VIS MIN

*Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

RAMOS (cont.)JUN 96 - 9 +17 +13 +11SEP 96 + 4 +16 +10 + 1DEC 96 + 7 + 1 -12 + 3APR 97 +31 +35 +15 +24JUN 97 +23 +34 +30 +32SEP 97 + 5 +16 -24 +11DEC 97 +19 +24 + 5 +29

ESTRADASEP 98 +19 +22 +15 +17NOV 98 +33 +41 +20 +42MAR 99 +34 +38 +18 +40JUN 99 +23 +35 +15 +30OCT 99 + 9 + 4 -10 + 7DEC 99 -14 - 9 -19 + 4MAR 00 + 2 + 8 - 4 +16JUL 00 +25 +30 - 3 +36SEP 00 + 7 +12 - 1 +20DEC 00 -14 0 -11 +31

ARROYOMAR 01 +30 +25 +25 +30JUL 01 +3 + 4 +18 +26SEP 01 - 7 + 2 +19 +19NOV 01 +7 +27 +32 +35

ARROYO (cont.)MAR 02 - 6 + 7 +29 +17MAY 02 - 3 - 5 - 2 +16SEP 02 - 3 +18 + 4 +28NOV 02 -13 + 5 +23 +34MAR 03 - 6 - 3 + 3 - 6JUN 03 +23 +22 +35 +13SEP 03 - 4 -11 + 2 - 6NOV 03 -15 -7 +19 +18MAR 04 - 6 +13 +27 +18AUG 04 - 5 + 7 +39 +22DEC 04 -11 -5 +17 +16MAR 05 -22 -20 +25 + 5MAY 05 -43 -23 -4 +17AUG 05 -25 -10 +8 -18DEC 05 -27 -11 -9 -21MAR 06 -33 - 8 - 7 -24JUN 06 -35 + 4 +19 + 6SEP 06 +29 - 3 + 5 + 3NOV 06 -10 - 2 + 5 - 1FEB 07 -20 - 6 -2 +12SEP 07 -10 + 8 +17 +16DEC 07 -24 -9 -9 -10MAR 08 -32 -20 -8 -17JUN 08 -27 -16 -26 -23SEP 08 -14 -5 -4 +4


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA (page 1 of 2)NCR LUZ VIS MIN NCR LUZ VIS MIN


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 3


ARROYO (cont.)DEC 08 -20 -1 +12 +1FEB 09 -29 -16 -21 -18JUN 09 -19 -12 -12 -2SEP 09 -22 -21 -21 -15DEC 09 -33 -18 -23 -20MAR 10 -57 -45 -39 -44

B. AQUINOSEP 10 +68 +66 +60 +61NOV 10 +49 +69 +59 +67MAR 11 +50 +42 +51 +47JUN 11 +48 +37 +47 +57SEP 11 +44 +59 +51 +63DEC 11 +64 +52 +58 +56MAR 12 +46 +39 +49 +55MAY 12 +41 +45 +29 +58AUG 12 +56 +65 +64 +59DEC 12 +47 +54 +66 +63MAR 13 +43 +54 +45 +63JUN 13 +53 +68 +76 +63SEP 13 +45 +59 +60 +53DEC 13 +30 +52 +51 +64MAR 14 +37 +41 +45 +56JUN 14 +16 +26 +41 +34

NCR LUZ VIS MIN


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA (page 2 of 2)

B. AQUINO (cont.)SEP 14 +36 +24 +45 +46DEC 14 +21 +35 +31 +43MAR 15 +21 +8 +34 +26JUN 15 +18 +29 +43 +34SEP 15 +24 +44 +34 +34DEC 15 +36 +35 +52 +36APR 16 +17 +30 +58 +33JUN 16 +32 +45 +62 +60

DUTERTESEP 16 +66 +60 +62 +81DEC 16 +53 +56 +58 +78MAR 17 +62 +60 +67 +79JUN 17 +67 +63 +56 +72SEP 17 +51 +52 +57 +74DEC 17 +71 +67 +57 +87

NCR LUZ VIS MIN




NATIONAL ADMIN., by ECONOMIC CLASS, FEB 1989 – DEC 2017


+10

+30

+50

+70

+90

-10

-30

-50


Net*

Satisfaction

ABC: +62

D: +71E: +66

1988 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 3


C. AQUINOFEB 89 +25 +17 +38SEP 89 - 5 +14 +22APR 90 +26 +16 +15NOV 90 -47 - 7 + 1JUL 91 -27 - 2 +10NOV 91 -25 + 1 +10FEB 92 -25 0 + 2APR 92 -21 - 4 + 2

RAMOSSEP 92 +26 +42 +36DEC 92 +20 +29 +42APR 93 +17 +22 +33JUL 93 + 3 +33 +39SEP 93 + 8 +11 +31DEC 93 +23 +23 +26APR 94 + 5 +16 +17AUG 94 + 9 +13 +19NOV 94 + 8 +17 +18DEC 94 +10 +14 +28MAR 95 - 5 +11 +13JUN 95 - 8 + 8 + 9OCT 95 -14 -20 -14DEC 95 -19 - 3 + 3APR 96 -14 - 3 +17

ABC D E

RAMOS (cont.)JUN 96 + 4 +12 +10SEP 96 + 8 + 5 +27DEC 96 +16 - 5 + 6APR 97 +33 +27 +27JUN 97 +39 +31 +27SEP 97 + 8 + 3 +14DEC 97 +27 +20 +17FEB 98 + 2 + 7 +18MAR 98 + 3 + 9 +11SEP 98 + 6 +18 +34

ESTRADANOV 98 +27 +37 +36MAR 99 +27 +34 +38JUN 99 +20 +29 +30OCT 99 + 5 0 +10DEC 99 - 9 -10 - 2MAR 00 + 4 + 6 + 8JUL 00 +18 +24 +28SEP 00 - 5 +10 +20DEC 00 -30 + 3 +13

ARROYOMAR 01 +30 +25 +29JUL 01 +16 +11 +12

ABC D E

ARROYO (cont.)SEP 01 0 + 7 +13NOV 01 +14 +30 +16MAR 02 +17 +15 + 1MAY 02 - 4 -3 +11SEP 02 + 7 +19 + 6NOV 02 + 1 +17 + 7MAR 03 -16 0 - 7JUN 03 +40 +19 +27SEP 03 + 5 - 7 - 8NOV 03 -14 0 +16MAR 04 +6 +15 +15AUG 04 +22 +15 +14DEC 04 + 1 - 3 +19MAR 05 -21 - 5 + 2MAY 05 -15 -18 0AUG 05 - 2 -11 -15DEC 05 - 9 -17 -12MAR 06 -37 -9 -24JUN 06 - 1 + 4 - 3SEP 06 - 9 - 1 - 6NOV 06 +10 - 4 - 1FEB 07 + 4 - 2 - 6SEP 07 +20 +8 +9DEC 07 -21 -9 -13MAR 08 -18 -19 -19

ABC D E


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by ECONOMIC CLASS (page 1 of 2)



ARROYO (cont.)JUN 08 -24 -19 -25SEP 08 -14 -2 -5DEC 08 0 +2 -7FEB 09 -26 -20 -16JUN 09 -12 -12 -7SEP 09 -35 -21 -15DEC 09 -34 -22 -17MAR 10 -47 -47 -41

B. AQUINOSEP 10 +65 +66 +57NOV 10 +62 +64 +65MAR 11 +19 +46 +50JUN 11 +45 +48 +36SEP 11 +62 +57 +52DEC 11 +54 +57 +53MAR 12 +38 +44 +52MAY 12 +27 +44 +50AUG 12 +69 +62 +60DEC 12 +78 +54 +62MAR 13 +68 +50 +60JUN 13 +61 +65 +71SEP 13 +62 +56 +54DEC 13 +54 +51 +50

ABC D E

B. AQUINO (cont.)MAR 14 +32 +45 +48JUN 14 +27 +27 +38SEP 14 +47 +33 +38DEC 14 +41 +32 +40MAR 15 +19 +18 +24JUN 15 +33 +29 +38SEP 15 +21 +38 +40DEC 15 +23 +39 +44APR 16 +17 +32 +46JUN 16 +24 +51 +50

DUTERTESEP 16 +58 +68 +62DEC 16 +55 +61 +62MAR 17 +61 +66 +69JUN 17 +55 +64 +68SEP 17 +60 +60 +46DEC 17 +62 +71 +66

ABC D E


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by ECONOMIC CLASS (page 2 of 2)



SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 4


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: MAR 2017 TO DEC 2017 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net*Mar17

Jun17

Sep17

Dec17

Mar17

Jun17

Sep17

Dec17

Mar17

Jun17

Sep17

Dec17

Mar17

Jun17

Sep17

Dec17

Total PH 75% 75% 71%79% 16% 13% 16%12% 9% 11% 13% 9% +66 +64 +58 +70

NCR 75 77 70 80 12 13 11 12 13 10 19 8 +62 +67 +51 +71

Bal. Luzon 70 75 66 76 20 13 20 15 10 12 14 9 +60 +63 +52 +67

Visayas 76 70 70 71 15 16 16 13 9 14 13 15 +67 +56 +57 +57

Mindanao 84 80 81 89 11 13 13 8 5 7 6 3 +79 +72 +74 +87

Urban 77 75 73 80 13 15 14 11 11 10 13 8 +66 +65 +60 +72

Rural 73 76 69 78 19 12 18 13 7 12 13 9 +66 +64 +56 +69

ABC 72 62 71 67 16 31 18 28 12 7 11 5 +61 +55 +60 +62

D 75 75 72 79 16 13 15 12 9 11 12 8 +66 +64 +60 +71

E 75 80 62 78 19 8 21 10 6 12 16 11 +69 +68 +46 +66


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: MAR 2017 TO DEC 2017 (page 2 of 2)

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses.Question. On the overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present national administration? Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied?

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net*Mar17

Jun17

Sep17

Dec17

Mar17

Jun17

Sep17

Dec17

Mar17

Jun17

Sep17

Dec17

Mar17

Jun17

Sep17

Dec17

Total PH 75% 75% 71%79% 16% 13% 16%12% 9% 11% 13% 9% +66 +64 +58 +70

Men 76 79 68 80 16 11 17 12 8 10 14 8 +68 +68 +54 +73

Women 74 72 73 77 16 16 15 13 10 12 11 9 +64 +60 +62 +68

18-24 74 74 71 73 19 15 18 18 7 11 10 9 +67 +64 +61 +64

25-34 77 74 77 81 15 13 13 9 8 12 10 9 +68 +62 +68 +72

35-44 75 76 70 84 17 13 16 11 8 11 13 5 +67 +65 +56 +79

45-54 75 74 68 78 14 13 18 12 10 12 14 11 +65 +62 +53 +67

55 + 74 77 68 76 17 13 17 15 9 10 14 9 +65 +67 +54 +66

Some Elem 72 78 62 79 20 14 23 13 8 8 14 8 +64 +70 +47 +71

Some HS 74 75 67 77 18 11 18 12 9 14 14 10 +65 +61 +53 +68Some Voc/Coll 75 73 75 79 15 17 13 12 9 11 11 9 +66 +62 +64 +70

Coll. Grad 81 83 73 80 11 7 15 13 8 10 12 6 +74 +72 +60 +74


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 5

Table 6


Overall performance rating 79% 12% 9% +70

Fighting terrorism 79 10 11 +67

Helping the poor 78 10 12 +66

Building and maintenance of public works 70 18 11 +59

Foreign relations 66 22 11 +55

Providing jobs 67 17 16 +50

Reconciling with Muslim rebels 64 19 17 +48

Telling the truth to the people 62 22 15 +47

Defending the country's territorial rights 61 23 15 +46

Protecting human rights 62 21 17 +45

Reconciling with communist rebels 61 22 17 +43

Fighting crimes 62 19 19 +43

Eradicating graft and corruption 62 18 20 +42

Ensuring an efficient public transportation system 60 22 18 +42

Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry 56 20 24 +33

Solving the problem of extra judicial killings or EJK 54 23 23 +30

Ensuring that oil companies do not take advantage

of oil prices 51 26 21 +30

Fighting inflation 53 16 30 +24

Resolving the traffic problem 51 20 28 +23


SAT UND DIS NET

SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON SPECIFIC ISSUES: PHILIPPINES, DEC 2017

Excellent

Good (11)

Very Good (5)

Moderate (2)



Mar17 Jun17 Sep17 Dec17

NET* SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON SPECIFIC ISSUES: PHILIPPINES, MAR – DEC 2017

Overall performance rating +66 +64 +58 +70

Fighting terrorism +47 +49 +47 +67

Helping the poor +63 +65 +67 +66

Building and maintenance of public works +40 (Dec00) +59

Foreign relations +46 +44 +40 +55

Providing jobs +43 +51 +50 +50

Reconciling with Muslim rebels +33 +32 +38 +48

Telling the truth to the people +15 (Mar15) +47

Defending the country's territorial rights +46 +51 +52 +46

Protecting human rights +23 +55 +46 +45

Reconciling with communist rebels +32 +31 +35 +43

Fighting crimes +41 +43 +30 +43

Eradicating graft and corruption +39 +43 +35 +42

Ensuring an efficient public transportation system +48 (Dec16) +42

Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry +22 +32 +29 +33

Solving the problem of extra judicial killings or EJK +37 +34 +22 +30

Ensuring that oil companies do not take advantage

of oil prices +5 (Sep15) +30

Fighting inflation +13 +24 +21 +24

Resolving the traffic problem +21 +25 +22 +23

Excellent

Good (11)

Very Good (5)

Moderate (2)


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 4

Chart 5



ON FIGHTING TERRORISM: PHILIPPINES, NOV 2002 – DEC 2017


+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

+67

VGNet*

Satisfaction

ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

2002 2004 2010 2017



ON HELPING THE POOR: PHILIPPINES, DEC 1993 – DEC 2017


+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

1998 2001 2004 2010 20171993

VG

Net*

Satisfaction

RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

+66


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 6

Chart 7



ON BUILDING AND MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC WORKS LIKE

ROADS AND BRIDGES: PHILIPPINES, MAY 1993 – DEC 2017


+10

+30

+50

+70

+-10

+-30

+59

VG


1998 2001 2004 2010 2017

Net*

Satisfaction

1993



ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: PHILIPPINES, SEP 1992 – DEC 2017


2017

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

+55

VG


1992 1998 2001 2004 2010

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 8

Chart 9


NET SATISFACTION* WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON PROVIDING JOBS: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1998 – DEC 2017


+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

Net*

Satisfaction+50

VG

1998 2001 2004 2010 2017


NET* SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION ON

RECONCILING WITH MUSLIM REBELS: PHILIPPINES,

SEP 1998 – DEC 2017


+10

+30

+50

-10

-30


+48

G

Net*

Satisfaction

1998 2001 2004 2011 2017


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 10

Chart 11




TELLING THE TRUTH TO THE PEOPLE: PHILIPPINES,

MAR 1987 – DEC 2017

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

+47

G


1987 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017

Net*

Satisfaction



ON DEFENDING THE COUNTRY’S TERRITORIAL RIGHTS:

PHILIPPINES, MAR 1999 – DEC 2017


+10

+30

+50

-10

-30


Net*

Satisfaction +46

G

1999 2001 2004 2010 2017


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 12

Chart 13



ON PROMOTING/PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS: PHILIPPINES,

MAR 1987 – DEC 2017


+10

+30

+50

-10

-30


Net*

Satisfaction

+45

G

1987 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017



ON RECONCILING WITH COMMUNIST REBELS: PHILIPPINES,

SEP 1998 – DEC 2017


+10

+30

+50

-10

-30


+43

G

Net*

Satisfaction

1998 2001 2004 2010 2017


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 14

Chart 15



ON FIGHTING CRIMES: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1990 – DEC 2017


+10

+30

+50

-10

-30


Net*

Satisfaction +43

G

1990 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017




ERADICATING GRAFT AND CORRUPTION: PHILIPPINES,

MAR 1987 – DEC 2017

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30


Net*

Satisfaction

+42

G

1987 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 16

Chart 17



ENSURING AN EFFICIENT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM:

PHILIPPINES, OCT 1999 – DEC 2017



+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

1999 2004 2010 20171999

Net*

Satisfaction +42

G



ENSURING THAT NO FAMILY WILL BE HUNGRY: PHILIPPINES,

DEC 2004 – DEC 2017


+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

Net*

Satisfaction

+33

G

2004 2010 2017


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 18

Chart 19


2016 2017

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30


ON SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF EXTRA JUDICIAL KILLINGS OR

EJK: PHILIPPINES, DEC 2016 – DEC 2017


B. AQUINO DUTERTE

+30

G

Net*

Satisfaction



ON ENSURING THAT OIL COMPANIES DO NOT TAKE ADVANTAGE

OF OIL PRICES: PHILIPPINES, JUN 2011 – DEC 2017


+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

B. AQUINO DUTERTE

Net*

Satisfaction

+30

G

2011 2017


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 20

Chart 21



ON FIGHTING INFLATION: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1991 – DEC 2017


+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

-50


Net*

Satisfaction

+24

M

1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017



ON RESOLVING THE TRAFFIC PROBLEM: PHILIPPINES,

MAR 2017 TO DEC 2017


B. AQUINO DUTERTE

+23

M

2016 2017

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction

Fourth Quarter 2017 Social Weather Survey: Net ... · NG LANGIS SA PRESYO NITO (Ensuring that oil...

Documents

Transcript of Fourth Quarter 2017 Social Weather Survey: Net ... · NG LANGIS SA PRESYO NITO (Ensuring that oil...