UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE FORTY~FIFTH ANNUAL COMMENCEMENT EXERCISES
FORTY-FIFTH ANNUAL REPORT - FRASER · Act, as amended, I have the honor to submit the Forty-fifth...
Transcript of FORTY-FIFTH ANNUAL REPORT - FRASER · Act, as amended, I have the honor to submit the Forty-fifth...
FORTY-FIFTH
ANNUAL REPORTof the
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
COVERING OPERATIONS FOR
THE YEAR
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM,
Washington, June 24, 1959
THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 10 of the Federal ReserveAct, as amended, I have the honor to submit the Forty-fifth AnnualReport of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.This report covers operations for the year 1958.
Yours respectfully,
W M , MCC. MARTIN, JR., Chairman.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
CONTENTS
TEXT OF REPORTPage
Introduction 1Recession and Recovery 1
Federal Reserve action to combat recession 3Broader effects of monetary action 4Changing expectations 6Moderation of Federal Reserve policy 8Regulation of margin requirements 10Situation at close of 1958 10
Changes in Gold Reserves 11Gold and the balance of international payments 13Gold and the United States monetary system 15Gold and Federal Reserve policy 16
Demand and Supply of Funds in 1958 , 17Credit demands 18
Government 18Business 21Consumers 22International capital transactions 24
Credit supplies 25Consumer saving 26Institutional lenders 27Bank credit 27
Digest of Principal Federal Reserve Policy Actions, 1958 30Record of Policy Actions—Federal Open Market Committee 32Record of Policy Actions—Board of Governors 72Bank Supervision by the Federal Reserve System 89
Examination of Federal Reserve Banks 89Examination of member banks 89Federal Reserve membership 90Bank holding companies 90Trust powers of national banks 91Acceptance powers of member banks 91Foreign branches and foreign banking and financing corporations 92Inter-Agency Bank Examination School 93
Legislation 94Defense Production Act 94
iii
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
PagePurchase of Government obligations by Federal Reserve Banks... 94Alaskan Statehood 94Real estate loans by national banks 94Small Business Investment Act 95Bank Holding Company Act 95
Reserve Bank Operations 95Loan guarantees for defense production 95Volume of operations 96Earnings and expenses 97Holdings of loans and securities 98Foreign and international accounts 99Bank premises 100
Board of Governors—Income and Expenses 101
TABLES1. Statement of Condition of the Federal Reserve Banks (in detail),
Dec. 31, 1958 1062. Statement of Condition of Each Federal Reserve Bank at End of
1958 and 1957 1083. Holdings of United States Government Securities by Federal Re-
serve Banks, End of December 1956, 1957, and 1958 1124. Federal Reserve Bank Holdings of Special Short-Term Treasury
Certificates Purchased Directly from the United States, 1953-58 1135. Volume of Operations in Principal Departments of Federal Re-
serve Banks, 1954-58 1136. Earnings and Expenses of Federal Reserve Banks during 1958. . 1147. Earnings and Expenses of Federal Reserve Banks, 1914-58 1168. Member Bank Reserves, Reserve Bank Credit, and Related Items,
End of Year 1918-58 and End of Month 1958 1189. Bank Premises of Federal Reserve Banks and Branches, Dec. 31,
1958 12010. Number and Salaries of Officers and Employees of Federal Re-
serve Banks, Dec. 31, 1958 12111. Federal Reserve Bank Discount, Interest, and Commitment Rates
(in effect Dec. 31, 1958) 122
12. Member Bank Reserve Requirements 123
13. Maximum Interest Rates Payable on Time Deposits 12314. Margin Requirements 12415. Fees and Rates Established under Regulation V on Loans Guar-
anteed Pursuant to Defense Production Act of 1950, Dec. 31,1958 124
16. Principal Assets and Liabilities, and Number of All Banks, byClasses, Dec. 31, 1958 and 1957 125
iv
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Page17. Member Bank Earnings, by Class of Bank, 1958 and 1957 126
18. Analysis of Changes in Number of Banking Offices during 1958 127
19. Number of Banking Offices on Federal Reserve Par List and Noton Par List, Dec. 31, 1958 128
20. Open Market Transactions of the Federal Reserve System during1958 129
FEDERAL RESERVE DIRECTORIES AND MEETINGS
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 132
Federal Open Market Committee 133
Federal Advisory Council 134
Federal Reserve Banks and Branches 135
Map of Federal Reserve Districts 153
Index 154
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
The year 1958 brought vigorous recovery from a brief but sharprecession in economic activity in the United States. From a low pointin early spring, output of goods and services rose rapidly and, byyear-end, gross national product in current dollars exceeded and inreal terms was close to earlier peaks. As is characteristic of earlyphases of recovery movements, employment rose less rapidly thanoutput, and unemployment remained relatively high. Abroad, eco-nomic expansion was resumed at the end of 1958 after temporaryinterruptions in many countries.
The Federal Reserve adapted its policies to the changing eco-nomic environment by fostering bank credit expansion during therecession early in the year and by moderating the availability offunds in the last five months as economic activity gained momen-tum. Demands for credit remained slack early in 1958 and interestrates continued to decline. In the last half of the year, when privateand public demands for credit were rising, particularly those of theFederal Government to finance the large current deficit, interestrates rose sharply.
Consumer and wholesale prices, after rising somewhat early inthe year, were fairly stable during most of 1958. Stock prices, how-ever, rose rapidly throughout the year.
RECESSION AND RECOVERY
At the beginning of 1958, economic activity in this country wasreceding. Contraction in output and employment was general, andunemployment was rising at a disturbing pace. No one could besure how far the downward adjustment would go, or how long itwould last.
Even at that time, however, some were beginning to view theoutlook more optimistically. In January, corporations, taking ad-vantage of easier conditions and lower interest costs in financial
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
2 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
markets, were offering an appreciable volume of new issues in antici-pation of future needs for funds, and to refund shorter term debt.State and local governments were bringing to market bond issuesthat had been deferred earlier, and were stepping up the pace ofbond offerings to provide for public works.
SELECTED ECONOMIC INDICATORS1947-49=100
INDUSTRIALPRODUCTION
CONSUMER PRICES
^
FOODS
1954 '56 '58
160
140
120
140
120
100
NONAGRICULTURALEMPLOYMENT
NONMANUFACTURING
MANUFACTURING^^
v, 1 1 1 1 1 . .
WHOLESALE PRICES
MATERIALS S^y^sJ?
CS*'^'- FINISHED GOODS
, . I I l l I ..
- 140
- 120
- 100
140
- 120
- 100
1954 '56 '58
NOTE.—Seasonally adjusted series, except for prices. Bureau of Labor Statisticsdata for employment and prices and Federal Reserve data for production.
Farmers continued to foresee favorable output and price condi-tions in agriculture and were bidding up further the prices of farmland. Bankers, with slackened customer demand for credit andstrengthened reserve positions, were bidding more aggressively forinvestments. By February, bankers were accelerating expansion of the
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 3
assets and deposits of their institutions, thus increasing more rapidlythe economy's stock of cash balances and raising its over-all liquidity.
By the early part of the second quarter, personal income andconsumer spending had ceased to decline and, in fact, were risingslightly. Production and employment turned upward soon after.Whether these developments, though encouraging, foreshadowedwide revival in activity was not known at the time; not until summerdid the current flow of information and reports provide substantialconfirmation that general economic recovery was under way.
From that stage on, currently available data reflecting markettrends, production, and employment showed that recovery was bothbroadly based and vigorous. At year-end, eight months after recoveryhad set in, total output approximated the peak of 1957 and it wasgrowing with increasing momentum.
FEDERAL RESERVE ACTION TO COMBAT RECESSION
Federal Reserve policy began to move in a counter-recession direc-tion in late October of 1957. At that time, the System began to shiftits open market operations toward supplying reserves more liberallyto the banking system. In November, it reduced the discount rates onmember bank borrowings from the Reserve Banks. As the stream offactual information verified the emergence of recessionary trends,Federal Reserve actions and policies became more aggressive, anddiscount rate, open market, and reserve requirement instrumentswere actively applied in complementary fashion to foster ease incredit markets and encourage bank credit and monetary expansion.
From late fall 1957 through April 1958, there were four reduc-tions in Federal Reserve Bank discount rates, from 3^2 P e r cen^ to1% per cent. Through continuing open market operations fromlate fall of 1957 to early summer of 1958, the Reserve System sup-plied the commercial banks with some $2 billion of reserve funds.Through three successive reserve requirement reductions in latewinter and early spring of 1958, the System released for the useof member banks about $1.5 billion of their required reserves.
The total amount of reserve funds supplied by the Federal ReserveSystem over the nine months November 1957-July 1958 was enoughto enable member banks to reduce their discounts at the ReserveBanks from $800 million to about $100 million, to offset sales of
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
4 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
gold to foreign countries amounting to about $1.5 billion, and tofinance a commercial bank credit expansion of almost $8 billion.Monetary expansion from February through July stimulated bythis Federal Reserve action was at an exceptionally rapid rate—at an annual rate of 13 per cent for all deposits, including time anddemand deposits. For the active money supply, that is, demanddeposits and currency, the rise was at an annual rate of 8 per cent.After the shift in Federal Reserve policy in the summer, expansion inthe active money supply slackened, and for the year as a whole itamounted to about 4 per cent.
BROADER EFFECTS OF MONETARY ACTION
Although the immediate impact of Federal Reserve policy was oncommercial banks, it clearly had broader effects upon the economygenerally. For one thing, since commercial banks are direct partici-pants in some degree in all important credit markets, expansion inbank lending and investing activities intensified competition amongall lenders for the acquisition of the available supply of credit-worthy loans and securities. This widened access of all potential bor-rowers to credit funds. It also worked to reduce the cost of financingto borrowers generally—businesses, farmers, consumers and homebuyers, and all levels of government.
Another effect of the credit ease was a greater willingness on thepart of banks and other lenders to make new loans to businesscustomers and to renew outstanding credits. This permitted theorderly run-off of excess business inventories accumulated in thepreceding boom. It also facilitated the completion of business pro-grams of plant and equipment expansion begun in that period.With a $6 billion reduction in business inventory holdings and asignificant cutback in fixed investment programs during the reces-sion, business loans outstanding declined only $1.5 billion in theyear ending September 1958. The ability of businesses to main-tain their bank borrowing and also to borrow more readily incapital markets not only cushioned downward pressures on invest-ment spending but helped many companies to minimize cutbacksin their working force and payrolls, to maintain dividends, and tostrengthen liquidity positions.
In housing markets, the easier conditions broadened the avail-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 5
ability of mortgage funds. Discounts were reduced on FHA andVA mortgages subject to ceiling interest rates, and interest rateson new conventional mortgages fell. As bank credit expansiongained in momentum, banks participated in mortgage investmentmore actively than at any time since the boom housing year of 1955.The increased availability of mortgage funds at lower cost, togetherwith the maintenance of personal income, was promptly reflected ina step-up of builder activity in constructing new houses.
GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCTBillions of dollars, annual rates
500TOTAL
CURRENT DOLLARS
\r1954 DOLLARS
1 1
4 6 0
420
380 -
340
300
I I I I
GOVERNMENT
INVESTMENT < ^ - -
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
I- I I
300
260
2 2 0
40
1954 '56 '58 1954 '56 '58
NOTE.—Department of Commerce quarterly estimates, adjusted for seasonal varia-tion. "Investment" includes producers' durable equipment, private construction otherthan nonfarm residential, change in business inventories, and net exports of goodsand services.
In the consumer instalment credit area, the increased availabilityof funds made it possible for lenders to meet sound demands forcredit more readily, thus bolstering lagging demand for consumerdurable goods. On some transactions, terms were eased and, inaddition, new credit plans were developed and extended. Easier
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
6 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
credit conditions permitted lenders to be more liberal in grantingrenewals and extensions of time for repayment of outstandingcredit. Thus, the volume of repossessions and credit losses was lessthan would otherwise have been the case, with benefits to both bor-rowers and lenders.
Increased availability of funds also had an impact on State andlocal government financing. In some cases, the lower cost of financ-ing encouraged States and municipalities to borrow in order tofinance capital projects. Lower market rates also enabled certainState and local governments that had a ceiling on interest rates toreturn to the market. The increase in annual rate of spending byState and local governments from the summer of 1957 to the summerof 1958 was a billion dollars more than in the preceding year.
These observable effects of easier monetary conditions which de-veloped from efforts to combat recession were, of course, importantand salutary. They are not to be overly stressed, however, formonetary action is always only one element in Government counter-recession policy. In turn, Government policy is always only oneelement in the total economic scene. Businesses, individuals, andState and local governments, in the light of their own circumstances,were taking actions to adjust and adapt their situations and toredirect their energies. Their actions undoubtedly shaped the re-covery and gave it momentum. Restraint of inflationary pressuresduring the preceding boom undoubtedly contributed to an underlyingeconomic situation favorable to recovery and made the economy re-sponsive to these monetary and other anti-recession actions.
CHANGING EXPECTATIONS
Achievement of monetary ease to combat recession so promptlyand amply was not without its problems. One of the most acutewas the build-up of prices in the bond market as speculators countedon continuing business recession, credit ease, and still higher bondprices. Psychological reactions and expectations always play a rolein swings in economic and financial developments, but they wereof particular importance in financial markets in the summer of 1958as the economic outlook rapidly changed from one of a continuingrecession to one of early, vigorous recovery.
At that time, the improved economic outlook led to a sharp
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 7
change in expectations in regard to renewed inflationary pressuresand a turnabout in the trend of interest rates. A much larger Fed-eral deficit loomed up than had been estimated, as well as the crisisand threat of military action in the Middle East. Concern aboutthe drain of gold from the nation's monetary reserves through salesof gold to the industrial nations of Europe was a further cause ofuncertainty. The fact that the Canadian Government announceda major refunding operation at sharply higher interest rates wasalso a complicating factor.
In these circumstances, heavy market sales by holders of UnitedStates Government securities in anticipation of higher interest ratessharply depressed bond prices. Initially, this selling stemmed fromtemporary holders who had bought in anticipation of a continuedrise in Government securities prices. Some of these holdings hadbeen acquired with funds borrowed on thin margins in connectionwith the Treasury's June financing operations. In this financing, in-vestors had exchanged the major portion of maturing issues for 6%-year bonds rather than for the 11-month certificates also included inthe exchange offering. In many cases, selling was forced because themargins vanished as securities prices declined.
Prices of Government securities continued to decline under pres-sure of steady liquidation and the reluctance of investors to purchasemarket offerings in view of changed prospects for credit demandsand inflationary threats. During the period from June 19 throughJuly 9, the Treasury purchased nearly $600 million of the bondspreviously taken in the exchange, retiring about three-fourths ofthese and placing the remainder in Treasury investment funds. OnJuly 18, the Federal Open Market Committee concluded that themarket situation had become disorderly and decided to intervenetemporarily in the medium- and long-term sectors of the Govern-ment securities market. This action was within the framework of theCommittee's established operating rules. From July 18 to July 23 theSystem purchased $1.2 billion of securities involved in a Treasuryrefinancing, largely "when issued" securities, and a small amount ofother notes and bonds.
Thereafter, as market conditions became more orderly, no furtherFederal Reserve open market transactions were effected outside theusual area of short-term Government securities. During late July
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
8 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
and early August, sales of Treasury bills by the System togetherwith other factors affecting reserves more than absorbed the redun-dancy of reserves that threatened to result from Federal Reserveintervention in the Government bond market.
MODERATION OF FEDERAL RESERVE POLICY
By August, there was clear evidence in current statistics that re-covery in economic activity and production had gained considerablemomentum and was likely to go forward without serious setback.Moreover, in view of the strength of consumer demand, appreciablefurther decline in business inventory holdings and capital outlays wasno longer likely.
About this time, inflationary expectations began to spread. Theabrupt upward shift of interest rate levels in central money markets,while precipitated by liquidation of speculative positions in Gov-ernment securities, reflected in part investor demand for an interestpremium to cover the risk of a depreciating purchasing power ofinvested funds. There was a large shift by investors, including insti-tutional investors such as pension funds, in the allocation of newlyavailable funds to common stocks instead of fixed interest obliga-tions, with hedging against inflation a frequent explanation of thechange in investor policy. Large current and prospective demandsfor credit by the Federal Government, State and local governments,and home purchasers also influenced the rising cost of borrowedfunds. In the stock market, the volume of trading was expandingrapidly and the rise in stock prices reduced the yields on commonstocks below the yields on high-grade corporate bonds.
In the light of the rapidly changing economic situation, in mostrespects highly encouraging but with inflationary and speculative psy-chology spreading, the Federal Reserve, during the summer, beganto move away from its anti-recession policy of low discount rates,high excess reserves, and reductions in reserve requirements.
System open market operations after midsummer supplied onlya portion of the reserves needed to meet rising credit demands andto offset the reserve drain of a continued gold outflow. As a result,member banks drew down their excess reserves somewhat and at thesame time increased their borrowings from the Federal ReserveBanks. Such borrowing was made much more costly when Reserve
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
RESERVES AND BORROWINGSBillions of dollars
BORROWINGS
A/ r/ EXCESS RESERVES
2.0
1.01954 1956 1958
NOTE.—Monthly averages of daily figures for member banks. Net reserve positionindicates excess reserves minus borrowings.
Bank discount rates were raised in the late summer from 1% p e r
cent to 2 per cent, and in midautumn to a level of iy2 pe^ cent.From late summer through the end of the year, bank credit and
the money supply continued to expand but at a rate much reducedfrom earlier in the year. Some seasonal expansion in business loanswas supplemented by a rapid growth of real estate loans. On theother hand, bank holdings of short-term United States Governmentsecurities rose only moderately despite a substantial increase in thesupply of such securities to finance the Treasury's deficit. Withbusiness sales and liquidity showing rapid rise, the higher interestrates that developed in the market helped to attract a substantialvolume of funds of nonbank investors, especially business corpora-tions, into the purchase of the new short-term Treasury issues. Asa consequence, the Treasury was able to finance most of its deficit
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
10 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
outside the banking system, and at the same time banks were ableto meet private credit demands accompanying economic recovery,with only a moderate further growth in total bank credit and money.
REGULATION OF MARGIN REQUIREMENTS
In addition to its broader monetary responsibilities, the FederalReserve is directed by law to prescribe margin requirements toguard against excessive use of credit for purchasing or carrying stockmarket securities. By providing a means of dealing directly withthis volatile type of credit, margin requirements serve as a special-purpose supplement to the general instruments of Federal Reserveaction. Since the flow of credit into the stock market tends to fluctu-ate with general business conditions, changes in margin requirementsare usually correlated with policy actions that affect general creditavailability.
Following the stock market decline in the early fall of 1957, totalcredit to customers for purchasing and carrying stock market secu-rities declined by about 5 per cent and was back to about the leveloutstanding in mid-1955. With this indication of abatement ofcredit use in the stock market, the Board of Governors, early inJanuary 1958, reduced the required margin from 70 to 50 per cent.
With the increasing activity and rise in stock prices accompany-ing economic recovery, stock market credit rose sharply, reachingby July a level about 20 per cent above the volume at the beginningof the year. In view of the rapid rise in credit to finance trading inor temporary ownership of stocks, and the emerging investment psy-chology favoring purchase of stocks as an inflation hedge, the Board,early in August, restored the required margin to 70 per cent. Asoutstanding stock market credit continued to rise following thisaction, the Board, in mid-October, raised the required margin to90 per cent.
SITUATION AT CLOSE OF 1958
Monetary policy during the autumn aligned monetary conditionsmore closely with developments in the economy. Consumer spendingon durable goods and housing continued to expand and was reflectedin high levels of output of household durable goods, in a more than
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 11
seasonal pickup in auto production, and in a rise in housing startsto the highest level in recent years. Business inventory policies wereswitching from liquidation toward accumulation, and there was awidespread, though small, upturn in capital expenditures. At thesame time, Federal, as well as State and local government spending,was expanding rapidly in accordance with budgetary authorizationsadopted earlier.
In financial markets moderate curtailment of credit availabilityand higher interest rates helped to dampen speculative excesses thendeveloping, to restrain and spread out the volume of new corporateand municipal securities financing, and to facilitate the financing ofthe large Federal deficit outside the banking system. The reductionof corporate and municipal securities financing followed some antici-patory borrowing by these issuers earlier in the year when long-terminterest rates were lower. At the turn of the year, there was a largecalendar of authorized but unissued State and local governmentsecurities.
Total economic activity, measured in real terms, had nearly re-gained its earlier peak. The active money supply had risen about 3y2
per cent above its pre-recession level, and holdings of other liquidassets, including time deposits, were up sharply. The financial basisfor further growth was established.
CHANGES IN GOLD RESERVES
Developments in international trade and finance in 1958, andespecially the decline in United States gold reserves, brought topublic attention the interdependence of events in free market econ-omies here and abroad. At the end of the year, announcement bya dozen European countries of the restoration of external converti-bility for their currencies testified to the postwar renewal of Europe'seconomic and financial strength.
Unlike most components of domestic demand, external demandfor United States exports failed to turn up during 1958. Exportsof goods and services, which in the previous cyclical expansion hadincreased from $18 billion in 1954 to an annual rate of $27 billionin the first half of 1957, remained throughout 1958 at the level of$23 billion to which they had fallen early in the year.
The position of the United States in world trade is unique, in that
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
12 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
it is the leading exporter of manufactured products and at the sametime the most important exporter of crude and semi-finished mate-rials and fuels. Like other exporters of primary products, theUnited States was affected by worldwide recessions in steel andtextile industries, which checked its previously swollen exports ofcoal, scrap metal, steel, and raw cotton. Like other exporters ofmanufactures, this country was affected by cyclical adjustments ofdemand, not only in other industrial countries, but also in the lessindustrialized countries whose international earnings had fallen.
U.S . BALANCE OF PAYMENTSBillions of dollars
- TOTALPAYMENTSFROM U.S.
EXPORTS OF GOODS / /- AND SERVICES S^ /
ry
_ s « e r - ^ / -•»' IMPORTS OF GOODSS' N^ / * * * *—' AND SERVICES _
Him li. nilNET TRANSFERS OF
GOLD AND DOLLARS1 1 !
1i
I
,,illlI
- 6
- 4
31
1954 1956 1958
NOTE.—Department of Commerce seasonally adjusted quarterly data. Total pay-ments from the United States include imports of goods and services, remittances,Government nonmilitary grants and loans, and net U. S. private capital outflow.Exports of goods and services exclude military transfers under aid programs. Nettransfers of gold and dollars include gold purchases from the United States and netincreases in foreign holdings of short-term assets in the United States and of U. S.Government long-term securities. Exports in first quarter of 1954 adjusted to include,and exports in second quarter to exclude, shipments delayed by port strike inMarch 1954.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 13
Moreover, United States export trade in manufactures becamesubject to increasingly effective competition from Europe and Japan,areas whose capacity for exporting had greatly increased. And whileUnited States demand for imported raw materials was relatively lowin 1958, demand for imported consumer goods continued to in-crease.
One consequence of developments such as these was that thesurplus of exports over imports of goods and services was muchsmaller than in 1957, and fell far short of matching the large con-tinuing outflow of private loans and investments and of Govern-ment loans and grants. The export surplus was only moderatelylarger than in the years immediately preceding the 1956-57 upsurge,but the capital outflow was much larger. In its total balance ofinternational payments—on current and capital account—the UnitedStates thus had an unusually large deficit in 1958. It is the purposeof this section of the Annual Report to indicate how gold move-ments were related, on the one hand, to this deficit, and, on theother hand, to the functioning of the United States monetary system.
GOLD AND THE BALANCE OF INTERNATIONAL PAYMENTS
A deficit in a country's balance of international payments (an excessof payments to foreigners over receipts from foreigners) involvesthe transfer of international means of payment from domestic toforeign holders. In relations between the United States and foreigncountries or international institutions, two kinds of internationalmeans of payments are used: gold and liquid dollar assets. TheUnited States Treasury sells gold to, and purchases gold from, for-eign monetary authorities for the settlement of international trans-actions at the fixed price of $35 an ounce, plus or minus a com-mission charge of one-fourth of one per cent. Dollar assets arefreely transferred between United States holders and foreign mone-tary authorities or (as far as foreign countries' exchange regulationspermit) private persons. Liquid dollar assets held by foreignersinclude deposits with the Federal Reserve Banks and other bankinginstitutions, holdings of Treasury bills and other United States Gov-ernment securities, and, to a smaller extent, holdings of bankers'acceptances and other short-term dollar claims.
In 1958, a major part of the $3.4 billion deficit in the United
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
14 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
States balance of international payments was settled in the formof gold. The amount of net gold sales to foreigners during theyear, $2.3 billion, was larger than in any other 12-month periodwith the exception of the period immediately following the out-break of the Korean war in 1950.
Some of the factors accounting for the large deficit in the UnitedStates balance of international payments have already been dis-cussed. The reason why a large fraction of that deficit was settledin gold lies primarily in the regional distribution of the balance-of-payments surpluses of foreign countries.
The practices of foreign monetary authorities vary widely in re-gard to the proportion of their reserves held in the form of gold onthe one hand, or dollars or other foreign exchange on the other.Some countries, such as the United Kingdom, Belgium, the Nether-lands, and Switzerland, have for many years held most of theirofficial reserves in the form of gold, and have held liquid dollarassets only insofar as they were needed for working balances. Mostother European nations also have held a substantial part of theirreserves in gold.
In 1958 the countries that experienced the greatest gain in re-serves were highly industrialized countries, including many Euro-pean countries. This development was the consequence of the slow-down in economic expansion throughout most of the free worldand of the relatively greater decline in export earnings for raw-material producing countries than for industrial countries other thanthe United States.
Sales of gold to the four countries that generally take practicallyall of their reserve gains in the form of gold (the United Kingdom,Belgium, the Netherlands, and Switzerland) accounted for three-fourths of United States net gold sales in 1958; sales to three otherindustrial countries (Austria, Italy, and Japan) accounted for vir-tually all the rest.
Within the year 1958, net gold sales were largest in the secondquarter, and gradually declined during the third and fourth quar-ters. This decline in the gold component of balance-of-paymentssettlements did not reflect a decline in the balance-of-payments def-icit itself.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 15
GOLD AND THE UNITED STATES MONETARY SYSTEM
A balance-of-payments deficit for the United States means, in thefirst instance, a transfer of liquid assets from domestic to foreignresidents or monetary authorities. This transfer need not affecttotal bank assets or liabilities in the United States as long as thedeficit is settled exclusively by transfers of dollar assets. For exam-ple, if a United States deficit is settled by the transfer of dollardeposits to residents of foreign countries and then to their mone-tary authorities, no change in total deposits with United States banksoccurs. If foreign monetary authorities receiving dollars then investin money market paper, such as United States Treasury bills, unlessthe bills are purchased from banks the effect generally will be simplya decrease in domestic nonbank holdings of bills accompanying theincrease in foreign holdings, with the volume of bank deposits re-maining unchanged.
If transfers of dollar assets to foreign monetary authorities arefollowed by sales of gold to them, further monetary effects of asomewhat more complicated kind occur. Under the monetary sys-tem of the United States, gold is both a means of internationalpayments and the ultimate reserve basis of the United States moneysupply. Movements of gold directly affect the money supply, thereserves of commercial banks, and the reserves of the Federal Re-serve Banks.
The great bulk of the gold holdings of the United States (at theend of 1958, $20.0 billion out of a total of $20.6 billion) is heldin the Treasury as security against a corresponding amount of goldcertificates issued to the Federal Reserve Banks. These gold certifi-cates owned by the Reserve Banks, together with their holdings ofUnited States Government securities, advances to member banks,and other assets, serve as backing for Reserve Bank liabilities. Un-der the Federal Reserve Act, holdings of gold certificates must benot less than 25 per cent of Federal Reserve note and deposit liabil-ities; actually the amounts held greatly exceed this minimum. Fed-eral Reserve deposit liabilities represent primarily reserves that themember banks are required to hold against their own deposits.Member bank deposits in turn are a major component of thecountry's money supply.
The way in which the money supply, member bank reserves, and
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
16 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Federal Reserve Bank reserves are affected by international trans-fers of gold may be explained by describing the consequences of agold sale by the United States to a foreign monetary authority. (Asale of gold by a foreign monetary authority to the United StatesTreasury would have exactly the opposite effects on bank deposits,member bank reserves, and gold certificate holdings of the FederalReserve Banks.) In preparing to buy gold, the foreign authorityusually accumulates funds in its account with the Federal ReserveBank of New York, either by selling money market paper or bytransferring funds from deposits with commercial banks. In eithercase, the immediate effect is a reduction in commercial bank deposits,generally those of member banks, and along with this a reduction inmember bank reserves.
When the foreign authority purchases gold from the Treasury, ittransfers funds from its foreign account with the Federal ReserveBank of New York to the Treasury's account with the Federal Re-serve Bank. (This is usually done through the intermediation ofthe Stabilization Fund of the Treasury, which handles these transac-tions through its fiscal agent, the Federal Reserve Bank of NewYork.) The Treasury in turn uses the proceeds in most cases toredeem a corresponding amount of gold certificates owned by theReserve Banks. The effects of the transaction thus include, first, areduction in money in the form of bank deposits; second, a drain onmember bank reserves; and, third, a reduction in the gold certificatereserves of the Federal Reserve Banks.
GOLD AND FEDERAL RESERVE POLICY
Gold movements and the underlying developments in internationaltrade and payments are among the elements of the economic situa-tion constantly under review in the determination of monetary policy.
In the administration of policy, the effects of gold movements uponmember bank reserves are of immediate importance, since changesin member bank reserves usually have further multiple effects uponthe money supply through bank credit contraction or expansion. TheFederal Reserve takes into account the impact upon member bankreserves of gold transactions and of all other factors that affectthose reserves, including changes in currency in circulation, move-ments in Treasury deposits at the Reserve Banks, and fluctuations
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 17
in Federal Reserve float. When, as in early 1958, the combinedeffect of such factors on member bank reserves would be in a direc-tion contrary to policy objectives, the Federal Reserve takes off-setting action.
In the first seven months of the year, Federal Reserve policy wasaimed at adding substantially to member bank reserves. Gold sales,however, were draining about $1.5 billion of reserves, and thisdrain was offset only in small part by other factors affecting re-serves. In order to complete the offset, and in addition to ease re-serve positions and provide for monetary expansion, member bankreserve requirement percentages were lowered, releasing $1.5 billionof reserves, and additional reserve funds were supplied throughopen market operations.
In the latter part of the year, continued although reduced sales ofgold further drained bank reserves. Also, the rise in currency incirculation drained more reserves than were supplied by the rise inFederal Reserve float. Since in this period the Federal Reserve wasmoderating the availability of reserves, only part of the contractiveimpact of these and other factors upon the reserves of member bankswas offset through open market operations. Member banks providedthe rest of the reserves needed for deposit expansion through bor-rowing from the Federal Reserve Banks.
Over the year as a whole, the ratio of gold certificate reservesof the Federal Reserve Banks to their note and deposit liabilitiesdropped from 46.3 per cent to 42.1 per cent, but it remained wellabove the statutory minimum of 25 per cent. There was a moderateincrease in liabilities for Federal Reserve notes in circulation. De-posit liabilities of the Reserve Banks declined; the increase in re-quired reserves of member banks brought about by growth in theirdeposits was more than offset by the lowering of member bankreserve requirement percentages.
DEMAND AND SUPPLY OF FUNDS IN 1958
Total public and private debt rose more in 1958 than in 1957,although much less than the record postwar growth in 1955. Recordpostwar expansion of commercial bank credit provided a large partof the funds to absorb this rise in debt, but funds available for in-vestment from nonbank sources also rose.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
18 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Availability of funds in relation to demand changed considerablyover the year, mainly in response to shifts in the business outlookand in Federal Reserve policy. In the first half of 1958, when busi-ness and consumer demands for credit were slack and the availabilityof bank reserves increased, funds seeking outlets pressed against de-mand and interest rates declined. Total bank credit rose contra-seasonally as banks increased their holdings of securities. In the lasthalf, when the availability of bank reserves was more restricted,vigorous economic recovery, together with a large Federal Govern-ment deficit, generated additions to demands for financing and inter-est rates rose sharply. Expectations of still more active credit de-mands and of possible creeping inflation tended to make lendersreluctant to invest in fixed interest obligations, especially on longerterm, and accentuated the rise in interest rates. The channeling ofan increased volume of available funds into stocks, also in responseto expectations of inflation, was a further factor of upward pressureon interest rates.
CREDIT DEMANDS
Credit growth in 1958 reflected mainly increased borrowing by alllevels of government. Rising Federal expenditures and reduced taxrevenues resulted in a large cash deficit, in contrast with a smallsurplus in the previous year. State and local governments increasedtheir outstanding debt more than in 1957.
Private debt expanded further, but the annual rate of growthcontinued the downtrend that had prevailed since 1955. Businessborrowing fell off substantially, reflecting reduced plant and equip-ment outlays and heavy inventory liquidation. Consumer indebted-ness for the purchase of goods and services declined during the year,reflecting principally a decrease in automobile purchases. Mortgagefinancing of residential properties, however, showed an acceleratedincrease. Outstanding farm mortgage debt also continued to rise andother loans to farmers by banks went up nearly one-fourth.
Government. The Federal Government had a cash deficit of $7.3billion in calendar year 1958, a sharp change from the surplus of$1.2 billion in 1957 and of $5.5 billion in the preceding year. Federalexpenditures were about $6 billion higher in 1958 than in 1957 andcash receipts nearly $3 billion lower. The decline in revenue, mainly
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 19
in corporate and individual income taxes, reflected the impact ofrecession on corporate profits and personal incomes.
Increased Federal spending was concentrated in the second halfof the year when outlays rose substantially. About $4 billion of the1958 increase was in unemployment benefits and other social secu-rity payments, but military, highway, and agricultural expendituresalso rose.
As a result of Treasury borrowing to cover the deficit, outstandingpublic debt rose $8 billion in 1958, the largest calendar year increasesince World War II. A small part of this increase occurred in thefirst half of 1958, when the Treasury used the proceeds of this bor-rowing, together with its seasonal cash surplus, to build up its cashbalance in anticipation of a larger than seasonal deficit later in theyear. In the last half of 1958, the Treasury financed its $12.6 billioncash deficit through net cash borrowing of $7.7 billion and a reduc-tion in the Treasury balance of $4.9 billion.
Marketable debt rose $11.4 billion, or $3.4 billion more than totalpublic debt, offsetting a decline of that amount in nonmarketableissues. About two-thirds of the marketable debt increase was inissues maturing in five years or more. A $14.5 billion increase inthese issues in the first half of the year, mainly in connection withrefunding operations, was offset in part by a $7.2 billion decline inthe last half as the passage of time carried some issues into shortermaturity ranges. Net redemptions of savings bonds continued, butwere in much smaller volume than in 1957. The volume of specialissues to Government funds and other nonmarketable debt alsodeclined in large part because of payments in excess of receipts inthe old-age and survivors insurance and unemployment trust funds.
State and local governments continued to increase their expendi-tures, as in previous years. Their needs for long-term funds, pri-marily to finance schools, highways, and other public works, wereincreasing, and these governments sold a record volume of bondsto obtain new capital. The volume of financing was heaviest duringthe first half of the year when State and local governments re-sponded to the lower level of interest rates by accelerating thefinancing of construction programs, funding shorter term debts, andundertaking some financing deferred in 1957. Despite a recordvolume of bond sales, amounting to $7.7 billion, the backlog ofauthorized but unsold bond issues increased during the year.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
20 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
INTEREST RATESPer cent
H"I J COMMERCIAL PAPER
, ' , OPEN MARKET ,
1954 1956 1958
NOTE.—Market yields, weekly averages of daily figures. Treasury bills, marketyields on 90-day bills. Long-term U. S. Government, yields on bonds maturing orcallable in 10 years or more. Commercial paper, rate on prime 4- to 6-month openmarket paper. Yields on corporate and State and local government bonds, fromMoody's Investors Service.
Market rates of interest on United States Government and Stateand local securities declined further in the early months of 1958following a sharp drop in the fall of 1957. Rates on Treasury billsand intermediate-term issues fell much more than rates on bonds,and the spread between short- and long-term Treasury issues reacheda postwar record around midyear. The smaller drop in long-termrates resulted in part from the continuation of a substantial volume
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 2 1
of bond issues by corporations and State and local governments,as well as by the Federal Government.
During the summer, rates rose sharply from their spring lows,reflecting the rapid economic turnaround and the growing realiza-tion that the Federal cash deficit would be large, together with amounting fear of inflation. After early October, rates on Treasuryissues were relatively stable despite substantial Federal net cashborrowing. Rates on State and local securities fell off somewhat inlate 1958, owing in large part to the small volume of new issues,and at year-end were about one-third of a percentage point belowtheir 1957 peaks.
Business. The decline in business investment that began late in1957 continued through the first three quarters of 1958. Outlays fornew plant and equipment fell one-fifth over this period and inventoryliquidation was substantial. In the fourth quarter of the year, spend-ing for fixed capital edged upward and liquidation of business in-ventories ceased. For 1958 as a whole, total business investment wasone-fourth smaller than in 1957.
Funds available to business corporations from current operationstook a sharp drop in the first half of 1958. While depreciationallowances continued to rise, retained earnings fell almost two-thirds. In the last half of the year, corporate profits rose sharplyand in the fourth quarter the volume of funds available from re-tained earnings and depreciation allowances reached a new peak.For the year as a whole, these internal funds were only 7 per centsmaller than in 1957.
The volume of external financing by business was considerablysmaller in 1958 than in any of the previous three years of businessexpansion although much larger than in the recession year 1954.Growth in outstanding securities of corporations was one-tenth lessthan in 1957 but more than in any previous year. Business loans atcommercial banks, however, declined slightly in contrast with in-creases of roughly $2 billion in the previous year and $6 billion in1956 and 1955.
The pronounced shift in external financing from banks to secu-rities markets evident in 1957 continued in 1958, induced in partby the somewhat reduced level of long-term interest rates thatprevailed in the first half of the year. In the last quarter, following
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
22 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
the onset of vigorous recovery and a sharp rise in interest rates,securities market financing fell off and demands for bank loansstrengthened.
Most of the decline in new securities financing was in issues ofmanufacturing and sales finance companies. Capital outlays ofmanufacturing corporations were at greatly reduced levels, and salesfinance companies had less need for new funds in view of thedecline in borrowing on automobiles by consumers and dealers.Public utility and communication companies reduced their expendi-tures for plant and equipment and their securities financing onlymoderately. A sizable increase in new issues by investment com-panies reflected in part the establishment of new investment com-panies.
Business loans at commercial banks fell off more than usualduring the first seven months of the year, mainly in response toinventory liquidation and the funding of some short-term loansthrough sale of long-term securities in the capital market. Businessloans rose over the remainder of the year, mainly because of sea-sonal borrowing and renewed borrowing by public utilities, whichhad reduced bank indebtedness over most of the first three quarters.
Outstanding mortgage debt on multi-family and commercial con-struction, part of which represents borrowing for business purposes,rose more in 1958 than in any other recent year. A large part ofthis increase, however, was for construction of apartment buildings.
With funds from current operations and external financing re-duced less than total spending for fixed capital and inventories in1958, corporations added to their holdings of cash and UnitedStates Government securities. Most of the additions were in thelast quarter, when a sharp rise in corporate profits brought themclose to pre-recession highs. At year-end, corporate liquidity, asmeasured by the ratio of these liquid assets to total current liabilities,was higher than at any time since the end of 1955.
Consumers. The pace of growth in consumer indebtedness slack-ened in 1958. The increase for the year in residential mortgage andconsumer credit totaled $10.7 billion, about the same as in 1954 butmuch below the $18.9 billion rise in 1955. Almost all the 1958 in-crease was in residential mortgages, which expanded one-fifth morethan in 1957. Outstanding consumer credit for the purchase of goods
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 2 3
and services changed little in 1958, as liquidation of debt early inthe year was about offset by later expansion.
Housing starts, which were at a reduced level in the first quarterof 1958, rose at a rapid rate over the remainder of the year, reach-ing a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.4 million in the last quar-ter. Of the 1.2 million starts for the year, privately financed unitstotaled more than 1.1 million, 15 per cent more than in 1957 andthe largest number since 1955. Apartment units accounted for alarger proportion of the starts in 1958 than in other recent years.
Reflecting the large number of sales of existing houses as wellas of new houses, mortgage debt outstanding on nonfarm 1- to4-family houses rose about $10.2 billion to almost $118 billion in1958 compared with an increase of $8.6 billion in 1957. Nearlythree-fourths of the increase was in conventional mortgages andthe remainder in FHA-insured mortgages; both types rose muchmore than in any previous year. VA-guaranteed mortgage debtdeclined for the first time on record, reflecting for the most part afurther drop in volume of new loans to the lowest level since 1949.
Yields on home mortgages declined along with other market ratesof interest in the first half of 1958. In late 1957, when yields oncompetitive capital market investments were declining sharply, mort-gage yields had shown little change. These mortgages continued tobe attractive to investors. The emergency housing legislation enactedin the spring of 1958 provided additional stimulus to home mortgagefinancing by authorizing the Federal National Mortgage Associationto buy $1 billion of FHA-insured and VA-guaranteed mortgages onnew low-cost housing, by eliminating discount controls on Govern-ment underwritten mortgages, and by raising the interest rate ceilingon VA-guaranteed mortgages from 4^2 to 4% per cent. After mid-year, when other market rates of interest rose sharply, mortgageyields rose only moderately.
Reflecting these and other developments, seasonally adjustedapplications for FHA insurance and requests for VA appraisals onnew homes began to mount in April, reached a peak in September,and then fell off. FHA applications for the year were the highestsince 1950, and VA appraisal requests were up nearly 50 per centfrom the low level of 1957.
Outstanding short- and intermediate-term consumer debt changed
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
24 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
little in 1958, after increasing in every earlier postwar year. Amarked decline in instalment debt on automobiles in 1958 wasoffset by increases in other types of instalment debt and in non-instalment debt. Extensions of credit on sales of new cars were farbelow the levels of other recent years. Extensions of personal loansand other consumer goods credit, after a downturn early in the year,increased gradually to levels above those prevailing at the end of1957. Extensions of automobile credit also rose in the last quarterof 1958 but remained below 1957 levels. Repayments of instalmentdebt were stable throughout the year. Instalment credit terms onsome transactions were eased and new credit plans were developedand extended.
International capital transactions. The net outflow of UnitedStates private capital in all forms was about $300 million less in1958 than in 1957, but this moderate decline was accompanied bysubstantial shifts in composition of the flows of investments andloans. The outflow for direct investment in affiliates abroad wasabout half the 1957 amount, a decline of more than $900 million,reflecting in part the completion of certain large capital expenditureprograms. Net new security issues in the United States by foreignand international borrowers, however, reached a postwar record levelof $900 million in 1958, twice as much as in 1957. Offerings byCanadian corporations and local governments and by the Interna-tional Bank for Reconstruction and Development were unusuallylarge, particularly in the first half of the year when interest rates inthe United States were relatively low, and the volume of otherforeign issues also was at a record level. The net outflow of bankloans and commercial credits was little changed; persistence of for-eign credit demands was associated in part with balance-of-paymentsdifficulties in some of the less industrialized countries.
These and other capital transactions, together with current trans-actions between the United States and the rest of the world, enabledforeign monetary authorities to acquire $2.3 billion of gold fromthe United States while foreign holdings of liquid dollar assetsincreased by $1 billion. Most of this increase was in time depositsof foreign banks at United States commercial banks. Foreign hold-ings of Treasury securities showed no net change. They declinedduring the first half of the year, when bill yields fell below the
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 25
time deposit interest rate, but rose in the last half when the trendof interest rates was reversed.
CREDIT SUPPLIES
The flow of loanable funds rose in 1958 following declines in1956 and 1957. The bulk of the increase was in commercial bankcredit, which expanded in response to increased availability of bankreserves by the postwar record amount of $15 billion. A major com-ponent of the growth in loanable funds was a postwar record rise incommercial bank time deposits. Individuals also continued to accum-ulate savings in other financial forms at a high rate. Activation ofidle cash balances, which had occurred in other recent years, wheninterest rates were rising, apparently did not continue in 1958.
BANK LOANS AND INVESTMENTSALL COMMERCIAL BANKSBillions of dollars
TOTAL
LOANS
AAJ
180
160
140
100
1954 1956 1958
NOTE.—Figures are partly estimated. Data exclude interbank loans and are for lastWednesday of month, except for June and December call dates.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
26 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Consumer saving. Saving by consumers in financial form—theincrease in their financial assets less the increase in their indebted-ness—continued at a high level during 1958 after rising substan-tially in the previous two years. Consumer accumulation of fundsthrough savings institutions and banks was at record rates, whilesaving through the acquisition of marketable securities was at amuch lower rate than in 1957. Indebtedness of individuals to pur-chase securities, however, rose sharply in 1958, while that for thepurchase of residential real estate and goods and services, discussedearlier in this report, rose by a moderate amount.
Deposits in mutual savings banks and shares in savings and loanassociations, which had been increasing by relatively stable amountsin the past few years, grew at a more rapid pace in 1958. The totalof savings and time deposits at commercial banks also rose more thanin other recent years, although growth in the last half of the year wasmuch below the rapid rate of the first half. This change in rate ofgrowth was due in large part to a shift of business and State andlocal government funds out of Treasury bills and other liquid assetsinto time deposits in the first half and a reversal of that flow in thesecond half in response to movements in market rates of interest onthese alternative investments.
Growth in savings deposits at commercial banks is estimated tohave remained above the high 1957 rate over most of the year,though dropping off toward the year-end. Individuals supplied fundsto other financial intermediaries, such as life insurance companiesand pension funds, at a somewhat higher rate in 1958 than in theprevious year.
Individuals accumulated securities at a much lower rate in 1958than in the previous two years. They made smaller net purchasesof State and local government securities and corporate bonds, andthey also reduced their holdings of United States Government securi-ties. Net redemptions of United States savings bonds were at a muchslower pace than in the previous year, but the decline in holdingsof other Treasury issues offset the previous year's rise.
Consumer net borrowing to purchase securities showed a markedrise of about $1 billion in 1958 in contrast with a decline of about$500 million in the previous year. Most of the increase was incustomer debit balances with New York Stock Exchange member
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 27
firms covering the purchase of corporate stocks. There was also con-siderable borrowing for speculative purchases of United States Gov-ernment securities in connection with the June Treasury financing,but these loans were rapidly liquidated following the sharp declinein bond prices in midsummer.
Institutional lenders. The flow of funds to institutional lendersincreased in 1958. Growth in assets of life insurance companies wasnearly one-sixth more than in 1957, but savings capital of savingsand loan associations rose one-fourth more and deposits at mutualsavings banks two-fifths more than in 1957.
Reflecting the increased demand for mortgage loans and therelatively high yield on mortgages in relation to other investmentsover much of 1958, institutions increased their holdings of mort-gages substantially more in 1958 than in 1957, while their holdingsof business securities rose less. The growth in mortgage holdingsof mutual savings banks in 1958 was $670 million larger than in1957, while the rise in business securities was $200 million less.Savings and loan associations, which invest primarily in mortgages,increased their holdings over $1.3 billion more in 1958 than in1957. Life insurance companies, whose new investments largelyreflect previous forward commitments, increased their commitmentsfor mortgages sharply during the year, but their acquisitions ofmortgages did not rise until late in the year. Mortgage portfoliosof these companies expanded $400 million less than in 1957. Theirholdings of business securities rose about as much as a year earlier,and, for the first time since 1946, their holdings of United StatesGovernment securities rose, contrasting with substantial reductions inother recent years.
Bank credit. Loans and investments at commercial banks rose$15 billion in 1958, about half again as much as the previous postwarrecord growth in 1954. In response to a continued policy of creditease, almost three-fifths of the increase occurred during the first halfof the year, a period when bank credit usually declines. About $1.5billion of the increase in this period was a direct offset to reductionsin reserve requirements. In the latter part of the year, as economicrecovery gained momentum and reserve availability was restricted,bank credit expanded at little more than the usual seasonal rate.
With loan demands generally slack throughout the year, most of
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
28 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
the credit growth was in holdings of United States Governmentsecurities, which rose by a postwar record amount of $8 billion.Investments in other securities, mainly State and local governmentissues, also rose by a record $2.5 billion.
Loan growth in 1958 totaled only $4.3 billion, slightly more thanin 1957 but much less than in most other postwar years. Real estateloans, which rose in record volume in the last half of the year, ac-counted for about half of the total loan growth. Agriculturalloans also showed a large increase. As already indicated, businessloans declined a little over the year, although growth in the lastquarter was about in line with seasonal expectations.
Deposits at commercial banks rose by a postwar record amount
DEPOSITSALL COMMERCIAL BANKSBillions of dollars
DEMANDSEASONALLY
6 0
5 0
40
1954 1958
NOTE.—Last-Wednesday-of-month figures partly estimated by Federal Reserve,except for time deposits in June and December, which are call report data. Demanddeposits exclude collection items, and both series exclude interbank and U. S. Govern-ment deposits. Demand deposits are for all banks in the United States.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 2 9
of $12.6 billion, more than twice as much as in 1957. Time depositsaccounted for almost three-fifths of this total, with a record growthof $7.0 billion. Demand deposits adjusted, which went down by asmall amount in the previous year, also rose substantially. Treasurydeposits, however, rose only slightly.
The active money supply—demand deposits and currency held bythe public—rose about 4 per cent in 1958, the largest increasesince 1951. On a seasonally adjusted basis, most of the increaseoccurred between the end of January and the end of July, whenbank credit was expanding at a rapid rate. Turnover of demanddeposits declined in the first half of 1958 and rose in the last halfto a level approaching the postwar peak reached in the third quarterof 1957.
Reserve positions of member banks over the year reflected thecourse of Federal Reserve policy, easing in the first half and tighten-ing in the last half, but changed little on balance. There were,however, substantial changes in several major factors affecting re-serves. Required reserves declined about $500 million, as depositgrowth absorbed about $1 billion of the $1.5 billion of funds re-leased through reductions in reserve requirements early in the year.System acquisitions of United States Government securities alsosupplied about $2.1 billion of reserves. Reserves were absorbed overthe year mainly by a $2.2 billion gold outflow and a $500 millionincrease in currency in circulation.
The principal Federal Reserve policy actions during the year aresummarized on the following pages, and are described more fully inthe records of policy actions of the Board of Governors and of theFederal Open Market Committee appearing elsewhere in this report.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
30 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
DIGEST OF PRINCIPAL FEDERAL RESERVE POLICY ACTIONS, 1958
Period Action Purpose of action
January
Tanuary
January-February
February
March
March
February-Mid-April
April
April-May
Mid-April-June
Limited net reduction in holdings ofU. S. Government securities to $900million, more than half of which rep-resented securities held under repur-chase agreement at end of year. Mem-ber bank borrowings declined to anaverage of $450 million.
Reduced margin requirements onloans for purchasing or carrying listedsecurities from 70 to 50 per cent ofmarket value of securities.
Reduced discount rates from 3 to 2%per cent at 11 Reserve Banks.
Reduced reserve requirements on de-mand deposits from 20 to 19V2 percent at central reserve city banks; from18 to 17̂ 2 per cent at reserve citybanks; and from 12 to IIV2 per centat country banks, thus freeing an esti-mated $500 million of reserves.
Reduced discount rates from 2% to2 lA per cent at 11 Reserve Banks andfrom 3 to 2lA per cent at one ReserveBank.
Reduced reserve requirements on de-mand deposits from 19V2 to 19 percent at central reserve city banks;from 17% to 17 per cent at reservecity banks; and from 11% to 11 percent at country banks, thus freeing anadditional $500 million of reserves.
Purchased about $450 million of U. S.Government securities. Member bankborrowings declined further to anaverage of about $180 million.
Reduced reserve requirements on de-mand deposits from 19 to 18 per cent(in two stages) at central reserve citybanks and from 17 to I6V2 per cent atreserve city banks, thus freeing a totalof about $450 million of reserves.
Reduced discount rates from 2lA to1% P e r c e n t at all Reserve Banks.
Purchased outright about $1.7 billionnet of U. S. Government securities.Member bank borrowings declinedfurther to an average of $100 millionat the end of June.
To ease reserve positions byabsorbing only part of the re-serves made available byseasonal factors affectingbank reserve positions.
To recognize that dangers ofexcessive use of credit forstock market speculation hadsubsided, since stock pricesand the volume of credit inthe stock market had declinedto levels near or below thoseprevailing at the time of theprevious increase in require-ments.
To reduce further the cost ofborrowing from the ReserveBanks and increase furtherthe availability of bank re-serves in order to encouragebank credit and monetaryexpansion conducive to re-sumed growth in economicactivity.
To supplement reserve re-quirement actions in furtherincreasing the availability ofbank reserves.
To supplement previous ac-tions to encourage bankcredit and monetary expan-sion and resumed growth ineconomic activity and to off-set current gold outflow.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 31
Period Action Purpose of action
July-early August
August
August-earlySeptember
August-September
Bought a small volume of U. S. Gov-ernment securities other than short-term issues and a large amount ofsecurities involved in a Treasury re-financing. Promptly thereafter reducedTreasury bill holdings substantially.
Raised margin requirements on loansfor purchasing or carrying listed se-curities from 50 to 70 per cent ofmarket value of securities.
Made little change in holdings ofU. S. Government securities. Mem-ber bank borrowings increased to anaverage of more than $400 millionin early September.
Raised discount rates from l3/4 to 2per cent at all Reserve Banks.
October
Late October-early November
Mid-November-December
Raised margin requirements on loansfor purchasing or carrying listed se-curities from 70 to 90 per cent of mar-ket value of securities.
Raised discount rates from 2 to 2lhper cent at all Reserve Banks.
Increased system holdings of U. S.Government securities about $900million, including securities held un-der repurchase agreement. Memberbank borrowings rose to average of$560 million in December.
To correct disorderly condi-tions in the Government se-curities market, to facilitatethe Treasury refinancing,and then to recapture thebank reserves created by theearlier securities purchases.
To help prevent an excessiveuse of credit for purchasingor carrying securities. Thevolume of credit in the stockmarket and stock prices wereadvancing sharply and wereat or near the highest levelssince World War II.
Open market action not takento offset drains on reservefunds reflecting bank creditand monetary expansion re-sulting from seasonal fac-tors and the sharp upturn ineconomic activity.
To keep discount rates in anappropriate relationship withmarket rates and to increasethe cost of borrowing by in-dividual banks from the Re-serve Banks in case of in-creasing demands for bankcredit.
To help prevent an excessiveuse of credit for purchasingor carrying securities.
To bring discount rates intocloser alignment with openmarket rates.
To meet part of reserve needsassociated with seasonal fac-tors and a further moderateoutflow of gold.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
32 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
RECORD OF POLICY ACTIONS
FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE
The record of policy actions of the Federal Open Market Com-mittee is presented in this report pursuant to the requirements ofSection 10 of the Federal Reserve Act. That section provides thatthe Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall keepa complete record of the actions taken by the Board and by theFederal Open Market Committee upon all questions of policy re-lating to open market operations and shall record therein the votestaken in connection with the determination of open market policiesand the reasons underlying the actions of the Board and the Com-mittee in each instance. Section 10 also provides that the Boardshall include in its Annual Report to the Congress a full accountof the actions taken during the preceding year, both by the Boardand by the Federal Open Market Committee, with respect to openmarket policies and operations and with respect to the policiesdetermined by the Board.
The record of policy actions of the Federal Open Market Com-mittee is prepared on the basis of the minutes of the meetings ofthat Committee, as approved by the Committee, and sets forth thepolicy decisions reached together with a resume of the reasonstherefor. Many policy decisions are by unanimous vote of the Com-mittee members, but the emphasis on specific reasons for preferringa particular line of policy may vary from individual to individual.There are times when individual members of the Committee mayconcur in a concept of policy action formed by a majority becauseit moves generally in the direction that they believe to be called for,even though their views may differ considerably from those ofother members of the Committee as to the degree of movementthat is desirable. When a member records a dissent from an actionof the majority of the Committee, the dissent may reflect a varietyof factors, such as a fundamental disagreement with the directionof policy action as indicated in the directive, or a fundamental dis-agreement with the emphasis attached to a particular objective asindicated in the directive.
It should be noted that the policy directive adopted at a meetingof the Federal Open Market Committee is usually in general terms
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 3 3
and that, without changing the wording of the directive, the Com-mittee may from time to time modify considerably the emphasisto be placed on operations designed to implement the general pol-icy. The shadings of opinion that enter into the formation of apolicy decision provide the Manager of the System Open MarketAccount (who attends the meetings of the Committee) with aguide to be used in the conduct of open market operations withinthe framework of the policy directive adopted at that meeting.
* * *The policy directive of the Federal Open Market Committee that
was in effect at the beginning of 1958 was the one that had beenapproved at the meeting on December 17, 1957. This directivecalled for open market operations with a view, among other things,to cushioning adjustments and mitigating recessionary tendencies inthe economy. It was issued to the Federal Reserve Bank of NewYork as the Bank selected by the Committee to execute transactionsfor the System Open Market Account and directed that Bank:
(1) To make such purchases, sales, or exchanges (including replacementof maturing securities, and allowing maturities to run off without replace-ment) for the System Open Market Account in the open market or, in thecase of maturing securities, by direct exchange with the Treasury, as maybe necessary in the light of current and prospective economic conditionsand the general credit situation of the country, with a view (a) to relatingthe supply of funds in the market to the needs of commerce and business,(b) to cushioning adjustments and mitigating recessionary tendencies in theeconomy, and (c) to the practical administration of the Account; providedthat the aggregate amount of securities held in the System Account (includ-ing commitments for the purchase or sale of securities for the Account) atthe close of this date, other than special short-term certificates of indebted-ness purchased from time to time for the temporary accommodation of theTreasury, shall not be increased or decreased by more than $1 billion;
(2) To purchase direct from the Treasury for the account of the FederalReserve Bank of New York (with discretion, in cases where it seems de-sirable, to issue participations to one or more Federal Reserve Banks) suchamounts of special short-term certificates of indebtedness as may be necessaryfrom time to time for the temporary accommodation of the Treasury, pro-vided that the total amount of such certificates held at any one time by theFederal Reserve Banks shall not exceed in the aggregate $500 million.
(3) To sell direct to the Treasury from the System Account for gold
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
34 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
certificates such amounts of Treasury securities maturing within one year asmay be necessary from time to time for the accommodation of the Treasury;provided that the total amount of such securities so sold shall not exceedin the aggregate $500 million face amount, and such sales shall be madeas nearly as may be practicable at the prices currently quoted in the openmarket.
The Federal Open Market Committee met 31 times during 1958.Of these meetings, 19 were held in Washington and 12 were heldby means of telephone conference arrangements in which some mem-bers were located outside Washington. In five of the meetingsheld by telephone conference, policy decisions were reached, whilethe other seven telephone conference meetings did not involve pro-posals for new policy actions but were for the purpose of discussingoperations being conducted within the limits of policy actions pre-viously taken. The policy actions taken by the Committee duringthe year are set forth in the following pages by date of meeting.
January 7, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
No change was made in the Committee's policy directive thatspecified that operations should be with a view, among other things,"to cushioning adjustments and mitigating recessionary tendenciesin the economy."
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Allen, Balderston, Bryan, Leedy, Mills, Robertson,Shepardson, Szymczak, and Williams. Votes against this action:none.
Domestic economic activity continued to be characterized by gen-eral cyclical recession, with contraction in output at a pace com-parable to that experienced in the 1948-49 and 1953-54 recessions.Gross national product in the fourth quarter of 1957 had decreasedabout $6 billion, annual rate, largely associated with inventoryliquidation, while industrial production for December was estimatedat 137, seasonally adjusted, compared with 147 a year earlier andwith the narrow range of 143-146 that prevailed during the periodfrom January through September 1957. The market for new auto-mobiles had been disappointing to producers, with sales off sig-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 35
nificantly from a year earlier, while repossessions on instalmentsales had reached high ground and still seemed to be edging up-ward. However, other sales at retail picked up sharply in the latterhalf of December, after having started the month slowly, and de-partment store sales, seasonally adjusted, reached a new high inthat month. Construction activity in December continued at recordlevels, with increases in residential construction again offsetting de-clines in the industrial area, but unemployment rose further in thatmonth to around 5 per cent of the total labor force. Wholesaleprices showed little change in December, remaining at about theaverage that had prevailed since midyear, while consumer priceswere reflecting advances in services and meat prices.
In the financial area, two developments had occurred since thereduction in Federal Reserve Bank discount rates in November.One of these was a sharp decline in interest rates and the other wassome seasonal increase in bank loans and investments, which repre-sented a turnaround from the contra-seasonal decreases shown forOctober and November. The Federal Reserve System had suppliedover $1 billion of reserves to the banking system during the sixweeks prior to the end of the calendar year, and those reserves hadcontributed to credit expansion as well as currency expansion a littlein excess of seasonal estimates. In brief, recent policies designed tocushion adjustments and mitigate recessionary tendencies in theeconomy had established the basis for maintaining the privatelyowned money supply.
Analysis of the data on economic activity indicated that thecurrent recession was attributable largely to a decline in businessplant and equipment expenditures, aggravated by an inventorycycle. It was not apparent, however, whether those influences werelikely to spread to consumer spending and thus produce a cumu-lative recession. There was uncertainty as to the probable speed ofinventory adjustment, particularly by manufacturers, and there wasalso uncertainty as to the amount and timing of the expected in-crease in defense spending, although it did not seem probable thatthis would be a significant factor for several months. In view ofthe wide range of possible ways in which the recession might de-velop, it seemed prudent to assume that the next upturn might bea fairly long way off, to be preceded either by a continuing gradual
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
36 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
decline or perhaps by a sideways movement after the current declinehad run its course. The shift in System credit policy in the fall of1957 had made it clear that open market operations were beingdirected toward assuring an adequate volume of credit for all poten-tial borrowers with economically sound credit needs, but on theother hand System policy had not gone to the point of trying tobring about an excessive volume of free reserves.
In concluding that no change should be made in the policy direc-tive, the Committee agreed that a slight easing in the reserve posi-tions of banks would be desirable and that operations in the SystemOpen Market Account should be conducted with sufficient latitudeto permit this development to take place within the limits of thedirective.
January 28, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
The Committee made no change at this meeting in the wordingof the directive to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, whichcalled for operations in the System Open Market Account directedtoward cushioning adjustments and mitigating recessionary tenden-cies in the economy.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Allen, Balderston, Bryan, Leedy, Mills, Robertson,Shepardson, Szymczak, and Williams. Votes against this action:none.
Economic decline had acquired a definite momentum at the timeof this meeting, and further decreases in production, employment,and other measures of activity were in prospect. It appeared thatthe industrial production index for January would show a declineof 2 or 3 percentage points from December, which would put itabout 8 per cent below the early 1957 level, and unemploymentclaims were continuing to increase.
The declines in activity during recent months had been traceableprimarily to adjustments in the capital goods area, and it waspointed out that readjustments in this particular area might take
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 37
considerable time. Installation of much new capacity during thepast few years had eased the supply situation enough so that forsome time there had been less incentive for buyers to maintain in-ventories and, at this time, they were being reduced. While inven-tory adjustments could occur fairly quickly, the rapidity of adjust-ment in both the inventory and capital goods areas would partlydepend on changes in other demands, including consumer demands,State and local government demands, defense demands, and foreigndemands.
The free reserve position attained thus far by member banks hadbeen of moderate size, and monetary expansion, which had pausedin the latter part of 1957, had not yet been resumed. Demand forbank loans now appeared to be showing a slackening drift, reflect-ing a larger than seasonal decline in business loans and also liqui-dation of dealers' positions in Government securities financed withbank credit in December. A large Treasury financing operation wasexpected shortly, and, although there were prospects that reserveavailability would expand in coming weeks owing to further sea-sonal decline in deposits and to a reduction in Treasury cash bal-ances, it was suggested that it would be desirable to continuethrough open market operations at least the present degree of re-serve availability until indications of monetary expansion appeared.Some members suggested a more aggressive easing immediately,believing that could be done without disturbance to the forthcomingTreasury financing. Such a policy would be consistent with the re-duction in discount rates to the 2% per cent level that had beenmade at several of the Federal Reserve Banks just prior to thismeeting.
In all the circumstances, the Committee concluded that, eventhough the level of economic activity was continuing to decline,there should be no change at this meeting in the policy of supplyingreserve funds in a manner that would cushion adjustments andmitigate recessionary tendencies in the economy and that, in view ofthe desirability of having an "even keel" during the period of theTreasury financing, open market operations should be directedtoward maintaining approximately the same condition in the moneymarket that had existed immediately prior to this meeting.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
38 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
February 11, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
The Committee again renewed without change the policy direc-tive that placed emphasis upon operations in the System Accountwith a view to cushioning adjustments and mitigating recessionarytendencies in the economy.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Allen, Balderston, Bryan, Leedy, Mills, Robertson,Shepardson, Szymczak, and Williams. Votes against this action:none.
Recession in general activity had continued during the month ofJanuary and signs of leveling out were not yet at hand. The de-clines were again general, but they were greatest in durable goodsand related industries. The length of the work week had fallen tothe lowest level of the postwar period, and by mid-January unem-ployment had risen close to the postwar peak of 4.7 million thatprevailed in February 1950. Manufacturers' new orders for Decem-ber showed a 2 per cent drop from November and were down I1/}per cent over the year, with new orders for durable goods runninga fifth below the previous year. Business inventory liquidation hadcontinued in December, mainly concentrated in durable goods man-ufacturing, but despite such liquidation the stock-sales ratio rosefurther to the highest level in a decade. January retail deliveries ofnew automobiles were some 20 per cent lower than deliveries in theprevious month or in January 1957. Preliminary estimates suggesteda further decline in gross national product for the first quarter of1958 of from $4 to $5 billion, annual rate, putting total productback to the level of the first quarter of 1957. Exports in Decemberwere down sharply after two months of stability. Favorable factorsincluded total construction activity, which continued at close torecord levels in January, and total retail sales including those atdepartment stores.
While business loans at city banks were liquidated in a record-breaking amount during January, the banks had increased theirholdings of securities since the end of November. As a result, totalloans and investments rose more in December and decreased lessafter the turn of the year than they did in 1957 or 1956. Time de-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 39
posits at city banks advanced even more sharply in January 1958than in the same month of the previous year. New security issuesby State and local governments were proceeding in record-breakingvolume, with some issues which were deferred in 1957 now beingbrought to the market. Short-term interest rates had declined to thelowest levels since early 1955, while long-term rates had been some-what firmer during the past two or three weeks. Reserves to covercredit demands had been abundantly supplied through market fac-tors and System operations. Additions to System holdings ofGovernment securities had been much larger in December thanusual, while the January decline was smaller than usual. The resultwas that the reserve position of member banks had shifted fromnet borrowed reserves of over $300 million during the last week ofNovember to free reserves of over $200 million in the past twoweeks. Projections indicated that free reserves might fluctuatearound this level during February and increase sharply, thoughtemporarily, in the first half of March unless offset by Systemoperations.
It was the view of the Committee that the policy that it had beenfollowing had resulted in placing the System in a quite appropriateposture. If later on there were clear indications that the recessionwas spiraling, more drastic action might be required. Accordingly,for the present it was felt that the Committee should continue tofollow an "even keel policy tipped on the side of ease." In thesecircumstances, no change was made in the existing policy directive.
March 4, 1958
1. Review of continuing authorities or statements of policy.
This being the first meeting of the Federal Open Market Com-mittee after the new members elected by the Federal Reserve Banksfor the year beginning March 1, 1958 had assumed their duties, theCommittee reviewed and reaffirmed all continuing statements ofpolicy and authorities for operations. These included the following:
a. It is not now the policy of the Committee to support any pattern ofprices and yields in the Government securities market, and intervention inthe Government securities market is solely to effectuate the objectives ofmonetary and credit policy (including correction of disorderly markets).
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
40 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Balderston, Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels, Mills,Shepardson, Szymczak, and Vardaman. Votes against thisaction: none.
b. Operations for the System Account in the open market, other than re-purchase agreements, shall be confined to short-term securities (except in thecorrection of disorderly markets), and during a period of Treasury financingthere shall be no purchases of (1) maturing issues for which an exchange isbeing offered, (2) when-issued securities, or (3) outstanding issues of com-parable maturities to those being offered for exchange; these policies to befollowed until such time as they may be superseded or modified by furtheraction of the Federal Open Market Committee.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Balderston,Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels, Mills, Shepardson, Szymczak,and Vardaman. Vote against this action: Mr. Hayes, ViceChairman.
Mr. Hayes stated that he would vote to approve the statement ifthe qualifying phrase, "as a general rule," were inserted after"shall" in the second and fourth lines.
c. Transactions for the System Account in the open market shall be en-tered into solely for the purpose of providing or absorbing reserves (exceptin the correction of disorderly markets), and shall not include offsettingpurchases and sales of securities for the purpose of altering the maturitypattern of the System's portfolio; such policy to be followed until such timeas it may be superseded or modified by further action of the Federal OpenMarket Committee.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Balderston,Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels, Mills, Shepardson, Szymczak,and Vardaman. Vote against this action: Mr. Hayes, ViceChairman.
Mr. Hayes stated that he would vote to approve the action if theword "solely" were deleted from the second line and "primarily"substituted therefor, and if the phrase "as a general rule" were in-serted after "shall" in line three.
2. Authority to efEect transactions in System Account.
Clause (b) of paragraph (1) of the directive was changed at this
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 4 1
meeting to provide that, among other things, open market transac-tions would be with a view "to contributing further by monetaryease to resumption of stable growth of the economy/' The Com-mittee also deleted from the directive the paragraph authorizing thesale direct to the Treasury from the System Open Market Accountfor gold certificates of such amounts of Treasury securities maturingwithin one year as might be necessary from time to time for theaccommodation of the Treasury up to an aggregate amount of $500million face amount.
Votes for these actions: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes,Vice Chairman, Balderston, Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels,Mills, Shepardson, Szymczak, and Vardaman. Votes againstthese actions: none.
During recent weeks, business activity had shown indications ofdeepening recession. A further decline during February indicatedthat the Board's index of industrial production for that monthwould be about 10 per cent under the mid-1957 high. Employmenthad continued to decline and unemployment to rise. Preliminarydata from a survey of plans for plant and equipment expendituresduring 1958 pointed to a decrease for the year of 10 per cent,whereas a similar survey made in the fall of 1957 indicated a declineof 7 per cent. Although the housing market appeared to be holdingfairly strong, the over-all summary of economic conditions at the timeof this meeting was described as one of little cheer.
The volume of free reserves had increased during late February,reflecting among other factors a reduction in reserve requirementsordered by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.At the same time the Committee authorized by telegram the mainte-nance of a somewhat higher level of free reserves than had beencontemplated at the February 11 meeting.
In the market, an expansion in the total volume of bank credit hadtaken place during February. Business borrowing had been sharplyreduced in the past 90 days, but the banks, supplied with amplereserves, had expanded holdings of securities and loans on securities,particularly in February, in contrast with the customary seasonalreduction at that time.
The Committee's discussion of the situation disclosed considerable
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
42 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
feeling that the policy directive should reflect a more positive ap-proach to recovery than was embodied in the wording calling for"cushioning adjustments and mitigating recessionary tendencies in theeconomy." Agreement was reached on the change indicated, namely,that during the period following this meeting open market opera-tions should be with a view to "contributing further by monetary easeto resumption of stable growth of the economy."
The Committee also discussed whether the discount rates at theFederal Reserve Banks should be reduced further from the prevailinglevel of 2% per cent, concluding that the matter should take itscourse at the respective Federal Reserve Banks.
Elimination from the directive of the third paragraph authorizingthe sale direct to the Treasury from the System Open Market Ac-count for gold certificates of Treasury securities up to an aggregateof $500 million resulted from the belief that under current circum-stances, including the action taken by the Congress to increase thenational debt limit from $275 to $280 billion, such an authorizationwas not likely to be used.
March 25, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
The Committee renewed without change the directive approved atthe meeting on March 4, 1958, which called for transactions in theSystem Open Market Account with a view, among other things, tocontributing further by monetary ease to resumption of stable growthof the economy.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Balderston, Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels, Mills,Robertson, Shepardson, Szymczak, and Vardaman. Votes againstthis action: none.
Economic information presented to the Committee indicated a like-lihood that industrial production during March would fall below therate for February, which was 130 per cent of the 1947-49 average.The February figure represented a decline from 135 in December1957 and 145 last August, which meant that in the six months fromAugust to February industrial production had declined a little morerapidly than in the corresponding periods of early recession in 1948-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 43
49 and 1953-54. Employment had continued to decline in both manu-facturing and nonmanufacturing lines, with the decrease particularlymarked in durable goods industries. Unemployment had risen sharp-ly to 5.2 million in February, the number of workers on part timehad increased further, and the number working overtime had con-tinued to decline. Meanwhile, however, both consumer and whole-sale prices were appreciably higher in February than in December,reflecting principally higher prices of food products and highercharges for services. Inventory liquidation was proceeding at a ratherrapid pace, while business outlays for plant and equipment werecontinuing downward, with no turning point yet in sight. Althoughconsumer buying had been well sustained, the February figures on re-tail sales were below the same month last year and it appeared thatthis trend might be continuing in March.
In the securities markets, stock prices had moved up irregularly andhigh-grade corporate bond prices had declined slightly since late Jan-uary. A more than seasonal reduction in bank loans to business hadaccompanied declines in economic activity and business inventories,but the banks had been increasing their investments since late in thefall of 1957 and total bank credit outstanding had increased at aseason when a decrease is usual. Corporations had obtained largeamounts of new capital, and borrowing by the Treasury and otherGovernment entities had been large.
There had been a fair degree of stability in activity abroad. Al-though the leveling off in activity overseas had had a disproportion-ate impact on exports from this country, the major part of the down-ward adjustment in exports appeared to have been completed. Thusfar, the recession in the United States had had only a limited impacton the industrialized European countries.
The record of free reserves and short-term interest rates since thelast Committee meeting suggested that the degree of ease desired bythe Committee had been achieved. However, there was at the sametime an occasional tendency for a feeling of relative tightness todevelop temporarily in the money centers. The commercial banks,generally speaking, seemed to have adequate reserves at their disposalfor the expansion of credit, but it appeared that the reduced level ofliquidity which came about in the late stages of the 1955-57 boommight still be exerting some dulling effect on their attitudes toward
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
44 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
lending. Accordingly, it was regarded by some as questionablewhether the commercial banking system would be an active instru-ment in fostering recovery until it had attained substantially greaterliquidity.
In the last 130 days the System had moved on a broad front toestablish a condition of credit ease. Aside from open market opera-tions making reserves more readily available, the discount rates of theFederal Reserve Banks had been reduced in several steps from 3^2per cent to 2% per cent, the latest reduction having been effected inthe period since the last meeting of the Committee. In addition,there had been two reductions totaling one percentage point in mem-ber bank reserve requirements against demand deposits, the morerecent of which became effective for central reserve and reserve citybanks on March 20, 1958, and would become effective for othermember banks on April 1, 1958. The present posture of FederalReserve policy was one of ease and it was the view of the Committeethat it should continue to be such. Discussion brought out the com-ment that, although further discount rate reductions might possiblyseem logical in view of the level of the Treasury bill and other moneymarket rates, a change on the eve of a Treasury financing might in-cite undesirable speculation in the Government securities market.
While making no change in the existing policy directive, the Com-mittee concluded that operations in the System Account should bedirected toward maintaining a slightly larger volume of free reservesand money market conditions slightly easier than had been achievedsince the last meeting of the Committee.
April 15, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
This meeting of the Committee resulted in a decision to continuewithout change the policy directive calling for operations designedto contribute further by monetary ease to resumption of stable growthof the economy.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Balderston, Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels, Robert-son, Shepardson, and Szymczak. Votes against this action: none.
Data available to the Committee indicated some slowing down in
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 4 5
the pace of decline for total output and employment, some levelingout in trade, and maintenance of construction activity at close torecord levels in value terms. In contrast, there were some develop-ments of an expansive character in finance. While the picture domes-tically therefore appeared as one of more diversity or crosscurrentsthan earlier in the year, the over-all drift of the economy neverthelesswas still plainly downward. Current statistics offered only slight basisfor the hope that the saucering-out phase of the recession was athand. After allowances for seasonal influences, the labor marketcontinued to show further weakening, while surveys of business plansfor plant and equipment expenditures reflected a further substantialprojected cutback for 1958 as compared with 1957. The industrialproduction index for March was estimated to have declined twopoints further to 128, and preliminary April information indicatedfurther output curtailment, much along the lines of the March pat-tern but with the possibility of some slowing. Retail trade, seasonallyadjusted, was estimated to have been off another one per cent inMarch, manufacturers* sales and orders continued to show declines,with the fall-off much sharper in durable goods than in nondurablegoods lines, and business inventory liquidation was believed to havecontinued in March at quite a sharp rate. At the same time, pricesat wholesale and in consumer markets had risen further to lateMarch, putting the indices a full one per cent above the December1957 level.
In the financial area, total credit extended by commercial bankshad apparently continued to expand during recent weeks, mostly inthe form of short-term liquid assets. Savings of consumers held infinancial form seemed to be increasing, while consumer debt hadbeen decreasing. Business loans at banks had increased less than atthis time in other recent years but corporate issues for new capitalcontinued at a high level, as did new issues of State and local govern-ments, and the Federal Government had become a net borrower. De-posits at banks had increased, on a seasonally adjusted basis. Short-and medium-term interest rates had shown further declines with widevariations, reflecting changes in liquidity, while long-term rates,under the influence of continued heavy borrowing in capital markets,remained firm.
Nearly $1 billion of reserves had been released by reductions in
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
46 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
reserve requirements of member banks since February 26 and an addi-tional $250 million had been supplied by System open market opera-tions through April 9. Reserves had been absorbed by an increase inrequired reserves of about $200 million resulting from growth indeposits, a rise in currency in circulation, foreign operations, con-sisting principally of gold withdrawals amounting to about $400million, and changes in float and other factors. Free reserves in theaggregate had averaged somewhat in excess of $500 million. Al-though country banks appeared to be well supplied with reserves,banks in New York and Chicago, and probably in some other cities,had experienced wide fluctuations in their reserve positions and hadborrowed heavily in the Federal funds market. It appeared that asubstantial amount of additional reserves might need to be suppliedby the Federal Reserve System in the next few weeks in order tomaintain a condition of ease conducive to further credit and mone-tary expansion.
Reports at this meeting indicated that the directors of some of theFederal Reserve Banks had been giving serious consideration to theestablishment of a discount rate lower than the existing 2*4 per centrate. With the recent Treasury financing now completed, it ap-peared that those Reserve Banks might act to establish a lower raterather quickly. A further reduction in the reserve requirements ofmember banks was seen as a possible means of providing the addi-tional reserves that would otherwise have to be supplied by openmarket operations during the next few weeks in order to maintainthe present level of free reserves. If the reduction were concentratedat central reserve and reserve city banks, it would also have a tend-ency to relieve pressure that occasionally developed in the moneycenters. Taken together, it was suggested that such actions on thediscount rate and reserve requirements would clearly confirm thecurrent easing posture of monetary policy and reinforce the policyobjective of assisting the recovery of the economy.
The Committee was of the view that there was no reason to changeits policy directive at this time. Free reserves had averaged slightlyhigher during the period since the last meeting of the Committeethan during the preceding three-week period, and it was agreed thatthis general level should be maintained. It was noted, however, thatif action should be taken in the near future on both the discount
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 47
rate and reserve requirements, the level of free reserves would tendto become relatively incidental, as long as the free reserve positiondid not decrease to an extent that might make it appear as thoughthe System was reversing policy.
May 6, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
The policy directive calling for operations to contribute further bymonetary ease to resumption of stable growth of the economy wasagain renewed at this meeting.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Balderston,Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels, Mills, Robertson, Shepardson,Szymczak, Vardaman, and Treiber. Votes against this action:none.
Although some statistical evidence suggestive of a slowing of eco-nomic decline had been accumulating, most of the information avail-able to the Committee at the time of this meeting indicated that therecession was still deepening and that a bottom was yet to be estab-lished. Among other things, the index of industrial production wasestimated to have dropped another two points to 126 in April, manu-facturers' sales and new orders were off again in March to about thesame extent as in February, business inventory liquidation in Marchwas found to have amounted to a further $700 or $800 million, sea-sonally adjusted, and estimates of new construction outlays had re-cently been revised downward due to lower private expenditures.Unemployment in April decreased less than seasonally, initial claimsfor unemployment insurance were still running at quite high levels,and the number of continued claims of those unemployed for 15weeks or more was double that recorded in earlier postwar recessions.At the same time, the average of wholesale prices was holding stableand the average of consumer prices was still rising.
Since the preceding meeting of the Committee, there had been afurther reduction to 1% per cent in the discount rates of most of theFederal Reserve Banks along with a further reduction of one-halfpercentage point in reserve requirements against demand deposits atcentral reserve and reserve city banks, while open market operationshad been such as to maintain free reserves generally exceeding $500
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
48 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
million. Financial developments during this period were influencedby the additional availability of bank reserves and by the activities ofbanks in endeavoring to put their available funds to use. Demandson capital markets continued heavy. In the five weeks ended April30, banks in leading cities showed a further increase of over $2.5billion in total loans and investments, and it appeared that duringthe five months since the end of November, a period in which bankcredit usually declines, total loans and investments of all commercialbanks may have increased by $7 billion or more. The increase inApril reflected almost wholly additions to holdings of United StatesGovernment securities, particularly the new Treasury five-year notes.Demand deposits adjusted at city banks increased during the fiveweeks prior to April 30 by about $1,200 million, compared with agrowth of $750 million in the same period of 1957, while time de-posits continued to increase at a much faster pace than the previousyear.
The pattern of economic and financial developments caused theCommittee to conclude that the prevailing policy of ease should becontinued and that no change should be made in the outstandingpolicy directive.
May 27, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
The Committee again continued without change the policy direc-tive providing for operations in the System Account with a view tocontributing further by monetary ease to resumption of stable growthof the economy.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Fulton, Irons, Leach, Robertson, Shepardson, Szym-czak, Vardaman, and Deming. Votes against this action: none.
The composite of current economic indicators reported at this meet-ing suggested that the recession in economic activity had been level-ing off and that a bottom to the decline might be in the making. Thedecline in industrial production, over all, seemed to have beenchecked in May, and a number of other indicators, including retailsales, personal income, residential building, and new orders receivedby durable goods manufacturers, likewise appeared to have stopped
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 4 9
receding or to have risen slightly. While inventory liquidation hadprobably been continuing in the aggregate, some key material mar-kets suggested a lessening in such liquidation. Also, although initialand continued unemployment compensation claims were still veryhigh, the trend was indicative of a little firmer labor market. Marchfigures for exports had risen from February, while imports continuedto be well maintained at the moderately reduced level of the first twomonths of the year. In agriculture, the income outlook was quitefavorable. Capital market activity had been well sustained and bank-ing developments were in the direction of a strengthening of businessand individual liquidity positions. As to prices, a degree of flexibilityin the area of industrial commodities seemed to be emerging grad-ually, especially at the wholesale level.
The Committee recognized that each of the favorable factorsneeded qualification and that a number of other factors in the currentsituation raised questions about the imminence of recovery. Further-more, there were reports of a substantial speculative interest in theTreasury issues maturing in June, a factor that suggested the needfor close attention in view of the forthcoming Treasury refundingoperation. On balance, therefore, it seemed prudent to view the forth-coming period as one of gradual testing, with the realization that onthe basis of past cyclical patterns the period of testing might last forsome time.
Short-term interest rates recently had declined to new low levelswhile long-term rates, after declining somewhat in April, rose slightlyin early May. New security financing by corporations and by Stateand local governments continued in large volume. Recent figuresshowed that total loans and investments of all commercial banksincreased by about $4 billion in April—a larger growth than hadpreviously been estimated—thus bringing the total increase since theend of November 1957 to above $8 billion. Marked increases oc-curred during April in both loans and investments at country banksand in holdings of investments by city banks, where declines inbusiness loans were offset by increases in loans on securities. In May,the decline in total loans and investments at city banks had beensmaller than usual at that time. Demand deposits adjusted andcurrency outside banks showed a seasonally adjusted increase of $900million in April following similar increases in February and March,
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
50 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
with the result that the total at the end of April was the largest sinceJuly 1957 and was equal to the total at the end of April 1957. Timedeposits, other than interbank, were about $7 billion larger than atthe same time in 1957, while interbank and United States Govern-ment deposits had also risen to higher levels than a year earlier. Inaddition to the growth in the volume of deposits, the rate of turnoverof demand deposits had increased in April, contrary to the usualseasonal trend, and was about the same as in April 1957. Free re-serves held close to $500 million during May, substantial drains onreserves attributable to the continued gold outflow and to a largerthan seasonal increase in currency in circulation having been largelyoffset by additional reserves supplied through open market operationsand other factors.
Estimates presented to the Committee indicated that reserve needswould be rather large in June and the first half of July, arising inpart from seasonal factors and from a larger than usual increase inTreasury deposits at banks. Therefore, in the absence of System ac-tion free reserves might generally average much less than the levelsthat had prevailed recently.
In the light of these estimates and related factors, including theimminent and sizable Treasury financing operation, the Committeeconsidered how best to implement and maintain the current postureof monetary ease without further depressing Treasury bill rates. Itwas the consensus that no change should be made in the language ofthe policy directive and that operations in the System Account shouldbe directed toward maintaining an even keel over the ensuing period.In terms of approach, this contemplated that the Account Manage-ment would place emphasis on the tone and action of the market andthe course of credit developments.
June 17, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
The directive was renewed without change, continuing the policyof contributing further by monetary ease to resumption of stablegrowth of the economy.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels, Mills, Robertson, andSzymczak. Votes against this action: none.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 51
Economic information available for this meeting was generally onthe encouraging side and was confirmatory of the report at the May27 meeting that bottoming out of recession was in fact occurring.However, analysis of the data suggested that the haze obscuring theoutlook had not suddenly lifted, and that it was the better part ofwisdom not to conclude as yet that a recovery pattern had definitelytaken form. On the other hand, it could not be denied that there wasa possibility that an accelerating recovery movement was nowshaping up.
High levels of consumer and Government demands seemed to beroughly offsetting recessionary forces generated in the investmentarea of the economy. Heavy demands on capital markets, including aTreasury bond offering for cash, had been met in part by substantialexpansion in bank holdings of securities and loans on securities. Ad-ditional reserves had been supplied by System purchases of securities,but on balance free reserves had been somewhat lower than in May.The money market had continued relatively easy until the week ofthis meeting, but with the mid-June needs for funds for taxes, divi-dends, and other payments, and with settlement for the recent Treas-ury offering of securities, it seemed clear that substantial financingneeds would have to be met by the banking system during the nexttwo or three weeks which would include the July 4 holiday demandfor currency.
Despite the encouragement expressed by most Committee mem-bers regarding the business outlook, it did not appear that the timehad arrived for backing away from the Committee policy of outrightmonetary ease or for creating a public impression that the Committeemight be backing away from it. There was general agreement thatover-all Federal Reserve credit policy should not be changed at thistime and that, during the next three weeks, the System should stayabout where it was. However, a minority suggested that, apart fromopen market operations, it might be desirable for some of the needfor additional reserves during the immediate future to be met by afurther reduction in reserve requirements for member banks. Anotherand contrasting variation from the general view was that reserves hadbeen supplied in over-generous amounts during the past two monthsand that further injections to maintain the recent level of around
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
52 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
$500 million of free reserves would abet speculation in the Govern-ment securities market and create excessive liquidity.
Consideration of the foregoing factors resulted in a decision thatat this meeting the Committee should make no change in FederalReserve credit policy and that for the next three weeks no actionshould be taken to cause the tone of the market to get materiallyeasier or tighter.
July 8, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
No change was made at this meeting in the Committee's directivecalling for open market operations with a view, among other things,to contributing further by monetary ease to resumption of stablegrowth of the economy.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Balderston, Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels, Mills,Robertson, Shepardson, Szymczak, and Vardaman. Votes againstthis action: none.
A summary of the economic data presented at this meeting wasthat performance of the economy in May and June had been betterthan had been anticipated. The index of industrial production overthose two months had risen two points, and final data might show therise to be three points. Gross national product for the second quarterwas currently estimated to be at least moderately higher than in thefirst quarter. Whether an abrupt turnabout of activity was takingplace or whether the extended improvement merely reflected a tem-porary rebound of production that had been far below consumptionwas yet to be determined. However, the odds seemed to favor morethan a rebound improvement.
An important feature of the recent strengthening was that it repre-sented a composite of small improvements over a wide range of ac-tivities, rather than dominant activity in one or two areas. One biguncertainty in the situation was the possibility of cyclical downturnin European business activity and of a new surge in inflationaryforces in the Latin American and Far Eastern countries. However,the evidence at this time did not warrant the inference that Europeanrecession was likely to become a force affecting adversely United
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 53
States and world trade developments, although it was apparent thatdevelopments in those markets would require close observation inthe months ahead.
On the financial side, the most striking development since the June17 meeting had been severe pressure on the Treasury bond market.The underlying feature had been the large commitments in Treasurybonds made by temporary holders, many for pure speculation, in-duced by expectations of further declines in interest rates, and theattempt to close out those commitments at a time when the moneymarket was under adverse pressure because of exceptionally heavyseasonal liquidity demands. This had called for exceptional amountsof Federal Reserve credit, and the increase in required reserves in thefive weeks ending July 2 had been one of the largest on record for aperiod of that length. System open market operations had supplied$1.4 billion of additional reserve funds, and purchases of Govern-ment securities for Treasury investment accounts had been made, not-withstanding which interest rates rose. The Treasury bond markethad been notably weak under the influence of the closing out of spec-ulative commitments, and yields on such securities had risen sharply.In addition to the present disturbed atmosphere of the Governmentbond market, it was noted that important Treasury financing opera-tions were in prospect between this and the next meeting of theCommittee.
While some members of the Committee felt that the likelihood ofa rapid upturn in economic activity argued for less ease, the Com-mittee reached the conclusion that, on balance, there should be nochange in policy at this time and that the directive should be renewedin its existing form calling for continued monetary ease.
July 18, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
The Federal Open Market Committee authorized the Federal Re-serve Bank of New York to purchase for the System Open MarketAccount in the open market this afternoon $50 million or less ofGovernment securities at the discretion of the Manager of the SystemOpen Market Account on scale wherever the Manager deemed itappropriate in order to steady the market.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
54 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Balderston, Fulton, Irons, Leach, Shepardson, andSzymczak. Mr. Vardaman, who was not present at the meeting,when informed of the action stated that he concurred. Votesagainst this action: Messrs. Mills and Robertson.
Authority was granted to the Federal Reserve Bank of New Yorkto purchase for the System Open Market Account in the open market,without limitation, Government securities in addition to short-termGovernment securities.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Balderston, Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mills, Robertson,Shepardson and Szymczak. Mr. Vardaman, who was not presentat the meeting, when informed of the action stated that he con-curred. Votes against this action: none.
The action set forth in the first paragraph of this entry was takenat a meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee, held by tele-phone conference in the early afternoon of July 18, and was based ona report by the Manager of the System Open Market Account that acondition was developing in the Government securities market which,in his judgment, was close to a disorderly condition although it hadnot yet actually reached that point. His recommendation was thatpurchases of securities during the afternoon of $50 million or less beauthorized for the purpose of steadying the market. After consider-ing the recommendation in the light of the existing conditions in themarket and of the Committee's continuing operating policy providingthat open market operations shall be "solely to effectuate the objec-tives of monetary and credit policy (including correction of dis-orderly markets)," the Committee authorized the purchase of Gov-ernment securities as indicated.
Messrs. Mills and Robertson voted against this authorization onthe ground that at this time no one contended the market was dis-orderly and therefore there was no basis for intervention. In addi-tion, they felt that the proposal to enter the market on a limited basis(as distinguished from action sufficiently massive to do the job) wasunwise and would do very little to restore confidence in the market.Furthermore, they felt that if later there should be a disorderly mar-ket, the correction of it would have been seriously handicapped by
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 55
temporizing and fluttering around the edges of the market withminor purchases at this time.
As the System Account was starting to put this authorization intoeffect, further developments in the market caused the Manager of theAccount to report (again by telephone conference) that he wouldnow have to call the market disorderly. After consideration of theManager's detailed report covering these developments, the Commit-tee approved by unanimous vote the action set forth in the secondparagraph of this entry, which authorized the purchase of Govern-ment securities in the open market, without limitation. It was under-stood that the authorization was made for the purpose of cor-recting a disorderly market and included the purchase of "rights"and when-issued securities, purchase of which was precluded duringa period of Treasury financing under one of the Committee's contin-uing policies, last renewed at the meeting on March 4, 1958. Intaking this action, the Committee also authorized the immediate re-lease of an announcement reading as follows:
In view of conditions in the United States Government securities market,the Federal Open Market Committee has instructed the Manager of theOpen Market Account to purchase Government securities in addition toshort-term Government securities.
July 23, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
The Committee authorized the Federal Reserve Bank of New Yorkto engage in a transaction that would include an offsetting purchaseand sale of securities in the amount of $30 million for the purposeof altering the maturity pattern of the System's portfolio.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Balderston, Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels, Mills,Robertson, Shepardson, Szymczak, and Vardaman. Votes againstthis action: none.
The purpose of this action, taken during a telephone conferencemeeting, was to permit the System Account to complete a specifictransaction for a foreign account in a manner that would result inadding to the amount of System Account holdings of Treasury billsthat would mature on July 31, 1959. Thus, the Committee would be
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
56 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
in position to let these bills run off at that time and to help absorbthe large volume of reserves that would be released to the market onAugust 1 because of purchases for System Account on a when-issuedbasis of new Treasury certificates due to be issued on that date. Thesepurchases had been made under authorization by the Committee onJuly 18 of purchases for the purpose of correcting a disorderlymarket.
The foregoing action was recognized as a departure from the Com-mittee rule, in effect since December 1953, prohibiting "swap" trans-actions. It was authorized only because of the unusual circumstancesof the past few days and because it was deemed desirable to have aslarge a runoff of bills as possible within the next few days whenlarge amounts of reserves would be released to the market.
July 24, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
The Committee terminated the authority given to the Federal Re-serve Bank of New York on July 18, 1958 to purchase for the Sys-tem Open Market Account in the open market, without limitation,Government securities in addition to short-term Governmentsecurities.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Balderston, Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels, Mills,Robertson, Shepardson, Szymczak, and Vardaman. Votes againstthis action: none.
The Government securities market had steadied in the period sinceJuly 18, when, because of disorderly conditions then existing in themarket, the Committee had authorized the purchase of Governmentsecurities in addition to short-term securities. Accordingly, at thistelephone conference meeting, the July 18 authorization was termi-nated with the understanding that, if conditions in the market shouldseem to require it, another meeting of the Federal Open Market Com-mittee would be called to consider what, if any, further action shouldbe taken.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 57
July 29, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
The wording of the Committee's directive was changed at thismeeting to delete the clause that had been in effect since March 4,1958, and which called for operations that would contribute furtherby monetary ease to resumption of stable growth of the economy, andto replace that clause with an instruction to the Federal Reserve Bankof New York that operations for the System Account were to be witha view, among other things, to recapturing redundant reserves.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Balderston, Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels, Mills,Robertson, Shepardson, and Vardaman. Votes against this ac-tion: none.
At this meeting reports of economic developments made it reason-ably clear that April had marked the recession trough and May thefirst month of revival in economic activity. Evidences accumulatingfor June and July confirmed the broad range of increased industrialoutput that had been reported at the July 8 meeting of the Commit-tee. In addition to the statistical data, indications of improvement inbusiness sentiment suggested that an uptrend in economic activitymight now be under way. The growing evidences of business im-provement, together with the possibility that the degree of monetaryease prevailing in recent months might produce a very rapid expan-sion in bank credit and the money supply, raised the question whetherthe Committee should consider some modification of the degree ofease that had developed in recent months.
During the two weeks preceding this meeting, System operationshad been largely concerned with correcting disorderly developmentsin the Government securities market, rather than with current eco-nomic and credit needs. This was in accordance with the authoriza-tion given by the Committee at a special meeting on July 18 to pur-chase Government securities without limitation for the purpose ofcorrecting a disorderly market.
In the five-day period from July 18 to July 23, the System Ac-count had purchased $1.2 billion of securities, largely when-issuedsecurities involved in the Treasury financing, but also a small volumeof other notes and bonds. These purchases had been made under the
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
58 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
specific authorization given on July 18 and within the general frame-work of the Committee's continuing operating policies that had beenin effect since 1953, and which were last reaffirmed on March 4,1958. Payment for the securities involved in the Treasury financingwould result in a substantial rise in the volume of member bank re-serves on August 1, over and above the level that had been main-tained during the past seven or eight months, and the Committeegave consideration to what would be the effect of such a substantialincrease in the availability of reserves. In light of the evidence ofimprovement in the economic situation, which suggested that thedirective that had been in effect since March 4 was no longer appro-priate, and in view of the decision of July 24 that the need for ac-tion to correct a disorderly condition in the Government securitiesmarket had passed, the conclusion was reached that for the next threeweeks the problem for the Committee would be one of absorbing theredundant reserves that would be entering the market, in so far asthat could be done consistently with an orderly market in Govern-ment securities. Thus, the Committee modified its directive in themanner indicated to require that operations be conducted with a viewto recapturing redundant reserves that were expected to be releasedto the market on August 1.
August 4, 1959
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
The Committee agreed that for the present, having recaptured re-dundant reserves, the policy to be followed with respect to operationsfor the System Open Market Account should be one of keeping fromhaving redundant reserves.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Balderston,Irons, Leach, Mangels, Mills, Shepardson, Vardaman, Allen,and Treiber. Votes against this action: none.
The recapture of redundant reserves having been effected, pursuantto the policy directive issued at the meeting on July 29, 1958, thisaction (taken in a meeting held by telephone conference) was forthe purpose of giving the Federal Reserve Bank of New York andthe Manager of the System Open Market Account an indication as
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 59
to general policy to be followed until the next meeting of theCommittee.
August 19, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
The policy directive of the Federal Open Market Committee waschanged at this meeting by adopting wording for clause (b) ofparagraph ( l ) to provide that, among other things, transactions bewith a view "to fostering conditions in the money market conduciveto balanced economic recovery." This wording superseded thatadopted at the meeting on July 29, which called for operations witha view "to recapturing redundant reserves" and which was supple-mented by the action taken on August 4 designed to keep fromhaving redundant reserves return.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Balderston,Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels, Shepardson, Vardaman, andTreiber. Votes against this action: none.
Information presented at this meeting showed that vigorous revivalin domestic economic activity was taking place. Similarly, in Canadarevival appeared to be under way. In Europe, production trends hadbeen mixed, with contractions, where occurring, apparently associatedwith inventory adjustment.
In the United States the Board's index of industrial productionthrough July had risen at least seven points or 6 per cent, from April,and it seemed possible that late data might raise the amount of ad-vance. Regional reports bore out the national trend, although someimportant areas of the country were still not experiencing much re-covery and the total number of unemployed persons nationally re-mained disturbingly large.
Domestic financial developments since late July included furtherexpansion in bank credit, which had risen by $7 billion in the firstseven months of the year. Financial markets had been influenced bythe stream of economic data and corporation reports indicating thatvigorous recovery was under way; by indications and rumors thatFederal Reserve policy might be shifting away from ease (the Boardof Governors of the Federal Reserve System had increased marginrequirements for purchasing and carrying listed securities from 50
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
60 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
per cent to 70 per cent, effective August 5, 1958); and by a flow ofbanking, monetary, and Treasury deficit data pointing to a sharp in-crease in the cash balance position of the economy.
In considering policy, the Committee was faced with the fact thatthe large Federal Government deficit would have to be financed dur-ing a period characterized by broadly spread revival of productiveactivity and incomes and an abnormal expansion in privately heldcash balances, and by the emergence of an inflationary psychology inthe stock market and other financial markets that could easily spillover into commodity and real estate markets. Notwithstanding thesubstantial numbers of unemployed persons, the data presented indi-cated that the rate of expansion in the money supply in the immediatefuture should be tempered and that operations for the System OpenMarket Account should move in the direction of lower free reserveswithout seriously disrupting the Government securities market. Thefact that seasonal influences would be working in this directionthrough the Labor Day week end suggested that, without too muchpressure, the System Account might be able to move in the directionof the elimination of free reserves by the time of the next meeting.
In terms of the policy directive, the objectives sought by the Fed-eral Open Market Committee were encompassed in the amendedwording of clause (b) to provide that operations should be with aview, among other things, "to fostering conditions in the moneymarket conducive to balanced economic recovery." This wording ofthe directive may be compared with that in effect from the March 4,1958 meeting until July 29, which called for open market operations"contributing further by monetary ease to resumption of stablegrowth of the economy/' and which had been temporarily inoperativefrom July 18 to July 24 in view of the special authority to make pur-chases for the purpose of correcting a disorderly condition in theGovernment securities market.
In its discussions of the policy directive the Committee also con-sidered the market structure of interest rates, noting that the discountrate of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco had been increasedfrom 1% per cent to 2 per cent effective August 15, 1958. Thereasons for this rate increase, which are presented in the section ofthis report dealing with policy actions of the Board of Governors ofthe Federal Reserve System, were reviewed at this meeting, and the
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 6 l
rate increase was considered to be consistent with the action taken bythe Open Market Committee in deciding to move toward reducedreserve availability.
September 9, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
The directive of the Committee was renewed without change, con-tinuing the policy of fostering conditions in the money market con-ducive to balanced economic recovery.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Balderston, Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels, Mills,Robertson, Shepardson, Szymczak, and Vardaman. Votes againstthis action: none.
Since the August 19 meeting of the Committee, reserve availabilityhad declined steadily with a minimum of disturbances in the Govern-ment securities market. Despite the reduction in reserve availability,the market had been more calm during the past few days than at anytime since June. A better tone also had developed in the market forcorporate and municipal bonds.
Economic data presented showed that domestic recovery in output,income, and consumption had been vigorous and that it held promiseof continuing to be vigorous over the period ahead. The Augustindex of industrial production was estimated to have moved up twopoints further, with the widespread gains in output extendingthrough durable goods and nondurable goods lines.
Financial developments of recent weeks had included those asso-ciated with an upward adjustment of interest rates—long-term,medium-term, and short-term. Several Federal Reserve Banks hadbrought their discount rates up to the 2 per cent level made effectiveat the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco on August 15. It wasdifficult to judge the extent to which the rise in interest rate levelsreflected a basic shift in credit demands relative to supply of savings,and the extent to which they reflected the influence of the recent shiftin System policy to less availability of reserves, but each had exertedan influence. The aggregate amount of credit supplied during theyear had been large and prospects pointed to an increase in privateborrowing along with the heavy Treasury deficit.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
62 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Discussion of recent developments showed differences of views asto the certainty of continued economic recovery and as to the degreeto which credit policy should move toward further limitation of re-serve availability over the next several weeks. There was generalagreement, however, that for the immediate future, during whichanother Treasury financing operation would occur, operations for theSystem Account should aim at maintaining substantially the sametone in the money market as prevailed at the time of this meeting.This objective could be sought within the wording of the directivethat had been adopted at the meeting on August 19, which called foroperations fostering conditions in the money market conducive tobalanced economic recovery, and the directive was thus renewedwithout change.
September 30, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
At this meeting, the directive was again renewed without change,thus continuing the policy adopted on August 19, 1958, of fosteringconditions in the money market conducive to balanced economicrecovery.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Balderston,Fulton, Irons, Mangels, Mills, Robertson, Shepardson, Szym-czak, Erickson, and Treiber. Votes against this action: none.
Since the preceding meeting of the Committee, discount rates atadditional Federal Reserve Banks had been raised to a uniform levelof 2 per cent. An even situation had been maintained in the moneymarket, which had been generally firm. At the same time, financialmarkets appeared to be discounting possible inflationary develop-ments. Thus, with re-emergence of inflationary expectations, stockand bond yields developed a relationship similar to that which pre-vailed for a brief period in mid-1957, when a psychology of creepinginflation was also dominant in financial markets.
At this meeting, the Committee considered in detail the currentlydeveloping economic situation, with its rapid expansion in industrialproduction while unemployment figures remained relatively high. Inthe face of uncertainties as to whether the recovery would be sustain-able, monetary policy was discussed in terms of the recent sharp rise
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 6 3
in interest rates, which some considered to be excessive in view ofthe basic supply and demand factors in the credit market. Consider-ing the importance of curbing inflationary and speculative develop-ments before they gained headway, attention was focused on theextent to which expansion of the money supply should be limited atthis time as a means of carrying out the Federal Reserve's responsi-bility for maintaining in a growing economy reasonable stability ofthe value of the dollar as well as in employment. One suggestionwas that the appropriate course would be to permit further expansionof credit and the money supply only on terms that would indicate theSystem's continuing awareness of potential inflationary risks and itsdetermination to prevent them from stimulating speculative excessesin the use of credit. The conclusion reached by the Committee wasthat operations in the immediate future should try to maintain aneven keel in the market and that no change in the policy directive wasnecessary. This was based on the view that no further increase atthis time in the degree of restraint was favored, nor on the otherhand was there a desire to ease the market from its present position.
October 21, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
No change was made at this meeting in the Committee's directivethat policy should be directed toward fostering conditions in themoney market conducive to balanced economic recovery.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Balderston, Chairman pro tern,Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels, Mills, Shepardson, Szymczak,and Treiber. Votes against this action: none.
Continuing economic recovery was reported at this meeting. Grossnational product for the third quarter was estimated at $440 billion,up $11 billion from the second quarter. Industrial production intoOctober was rising further and broadly, new construction activity inSeptember had been close to record levels, employment was risingand unemployment declining, and personal incomes were rising.Wholesale price averages had been stable for several months witheasing of farm product prices offsetting strengthening tendencies inindustrial materials and rises in some fabricated items. Latest newsfrom abroad indicated some extension of recession in the principal
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
64 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
industrial countries with, however, activity still fairly high in mostsuch areas.
Bank credit expansion in recent weeks had been larger than in thecorresponding period of 1957 but less than in some other years. Incapital markets, a shift from fixed return assets to equities seemed tobe continuing. Margin requirements on listed securities had been in-creased effective October 16, 1958. Slackened monetary expansionalong with Treasury deficit financing and general economic recoveryhad been possible because of previously accumulated liquidity. Fur-ther monetary expansion other than seasonal had not been needed tofinance economic recovery. However, the total of economic events andthe prospective borrowing needs of the Federal Government indicateda likelihood of growing credit demands in the near future. In addi-tion, an outflow of gold was persisting. It was estimated on the basisof customary seasonal currency and deposit growth, and with someallowance for a further gold outflow, that from the time of this meet-ing to the end of 1958 there would be a need for additional bankreserves totaling about $1.3 billion, a need that could be met mainlythrough open market operations without varying the degree of re-straint on credit expansion.
At this meeting, the Committee reviewed in detail the level andstructure of interest rates and considered the credit actions that wouldhelp keep investment and saving in balance. The discount rates of theFederal Reserve Banks currently were out of line with market rates,and the suggestion was made that an increase in discount rates wouldbe desirable in order to remove the incentive for member banks toobtain reserves by borrowing at the Reserve Banks instead of byselling securities in the market.
The conclusion of the Committee was that in present circumstancesit would be undesirable to aim toward a greater degree of restrainton reserve availability through open market operations, especially ifan increase in discount rates at the Federal Reserve Banks were to bemade at the same time. The directive was, accordingly, again re-newed with its provision for open market operations that wouldfoster conditions in the money market conducive to balancedeconomic recovery.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 65
November 10, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
The Committee again reaffirmed its policy of fostering conditionsin the money market conducive to balanced economic recovery.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Balderston, Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels, Mills,Robertson, Shepardson, and Szymczak. Votes against this ac-tion: none.
During the three weeks preceding this meeting, in which seasonaldemands for credit were present, the System Open Market Accounthad been fairly active in supplying reserve funds to the market witha view to achieving the objectives agreed upon by the Committee atthe meeting on October 21, namely, the maintenance of about thesame degree of restrictive pressure in the market that had existed atthe time of that meeting. Free reserves had averaged somewhat lessthan $100 million, and the money market atmosphere had beengenerally firm. During this period, the discount rates of all FederalReserve Banks had been increased from the 2 per cent level to 2 ^per cent—a rise that conformed to the prevailing money market ratestructure and appeared to have caused no further adjustment in themarket.
Economic indicators at the time of this meeting were still rising,although there was more diversity than had been shown in late sum-mer and early autumn and the over-all rate of rise seemed to haveslowed somewhat. The October industrial production index was esti-mated to have risen one index point, a smaller rise than had beenprojected earlier. On the other hand, construction activity had goneup in October to an all-time high, with advances shown in all majorcategories of private construction as well as public construction. Datafor United States exports during September had shown a sharp fall,but imports had risen. Stability to modest recession in activity inEurope was reported, along with a leveling out in Canadian recovery.The unevenness shown by economic indicators in recent weeks wasoccasioning in various quarters re-appraisals of the outlook, withsome toning down of optimistic projections because of inability toforesee forces that would convert recovery into a period of expansion-ary boom. However, the more moderate rate of rise was believed by
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
66 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
some to provide a better basis for expansion than if the rapid autumnrise had continued.
Sharp increases that had occurred in productivity during the pastthree months were being reflected in corporate profits and not inlowered industrial prices, and they thus provided support to demandsfor wage increases. There appeared to be little prospect for abate-ment of the persistent upward pressures on industrial prices notwith-standing the existence of unused resources, including considerableplant capacity not being utilized and substantial numbers of unem-ployed persons. Under these circumstances, a monetary policy on theside of restraint appeared to be appropriate and it did not appearthat such restraint would retard sound recovery and growth in theeconomy.
The conclusion of the Committee was that the System Accountshould seek during the period immediately ahead to maintain condi-tions in the market about as they were at present, believing that themoderate degree of restraint that had existed for the past severalweeks was appropriate under the circumstances and that it could beapplied within the terms of the directive to the Federal Reserve Bankof New York that had been in effect since August 19.
December 2, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
The Committee made no change at this meeting in the directivethat had been in effect since August 19, 1958, which contemplated apolicy directed toward fostering conditions in the money market con-ducive to balanced economic recovery.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Hayes, ViceChairman, Fulton, Irons, Leach, Mangels, Mills, Robertson,Shepardson, and Szymczak. Votes against this action: none.
During the three weeks preceding this meeting, the System Ac-count had provided additional reserves to the market and memberbank borrowing from the Federal Reserve Banks had risen on somedays in the past week to more than $1 billion. These supplies ofreserve funds had been sufficient to meet seasonal growth in currencyand an increase in required reserves, although free reserves had de-clined to a nominal level.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 67
Recovery in domestic economic activity was continuing on a broadbasis although, as indicated at the November 10 meeting, there re-cently had been indication of a slowing in the rate of expansion. Theweight of statistical evidence continued on the side of fairly wellsustained momentum upward. More recently, some indication of im-provement in the unemployment situation had been evident, and thenumber of labor market areas classified as substantial surplus areashad been reduced during November. Over all, it was apparent thatthe domestic recovery that had shown up during the summer monthshad now gone far enough to be on the verge of a new expansionperiod, with the possibility that the rise in activity would carry majorindexes of activity into new high ground.
Developments in the financial area had shown no particularlystriking features during the past month, although gyrations in thestock market had continued. Bond yields had declined somewhat inNovember, while short-term money rates had continued to rise. Al-though expansionary forces in the credit area had not been vigorousduring recent weeks, the basis for renewed expansion continued toexist in the broadening economic recovery and the continuingGovernment deficit.
The policy discussion by the Committee pointed to some increasein the degree of restraint that should be exerted, with the provisothat due consideration must be given to the financing problems of theTreasury. It was suggested that there was enough flexibility withinthe Committee's general policy to allow seasonal forces to exert aninfluence in the direction of some further reduction in reserve avail-ability, perhaps moving in the direction of net borrowed reserves.The Committee's conclusion contemplated letting market develop-ments tend to increase restraint within limits consistent with thepolicy directive which, as renewed at this meeting, continued to pro-vide for open market operations "fostering conditions in the moneymarket conducive to balanced economic recovery."
December 16, 1958
Authority to effect transactions in System Account.
The Federal Open Market Committee changed its policy directiveat this meeting by adopting wording for clause (b) of paragraph
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
68 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
( l ) to provide that, among other things, transactions be with a view"to fostering conditions in the money market conducive to sustainableeconomic growth and stability." It was the Committee's view that atthis time the emphasis should be on preventing expansion at anunsustainable rate.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Chairman, Fulton,Irons, Leach, Mangels, Mills, Robertson, Shepardson, and Szym-czak. Votes against this action: Mr. Hayes, Vice Chairman.
Since the recession's low in April 1958, recovery in economic activ-ity had been remarkably good. Gross national product, personal in-come, retail trade, residential construction activity, manufacturers'new orders, industrial production, freight carloadings, and variousother economic indicators had increased about as much in that seven-month period as in the corresponding seven-month periods of cyclicalrecoveries following earlier postwar contractions. The decline hadbeen somewhat deeper during the recent recession than in the pre-ceding two recessions, but it had been briefer and the subsequentrecovery more rapid than in other postwar and prewar cycles. Eventhough peak activity levels had not been re-attained at the time ofthis meeting, they were sufficiently close at hand to direct attentionto the problems to be considered in a period of renewed economicexpansion.
Money and credit markets had been calm during the month pre-ceding this meeting in the face of the vigorous economic recovery,the rather heavy financing operations of the Treasury, the liquiditydemands customary at this season of the year, and a moderate tight-ening of bank reserve positions. Interest rates had fluctuated moder-ately, close to the increased levels reached earlier in the autumn.Firming of rates during the two weeks immediately preceding thismeeting had not been as great as customary in December. In the firsthalf of 1958, when reserves were freely available, total loans andinvestments of member banks had expanded sharply. Since midyear,a period in which availability of reserves had been reduced, loansand investments of New York City banks had declined, those of re-serve city banks had increased only slightly, and those of countrybanks had expanded by much larger amounts than in the correspond-ing period of either of the two preceding years. In total, bank credit
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 69
since midyear had shown further expansion and by a greater thanseasonal amount. Reserves to provide the basis for this credit hadbeen largely supplied through System open market operations sinceAugust, when the volume of free reserves had been reduced sharply.
The discussion at this meeting of economic and financial develop-ments indicated a consensus favoring a move in open market opera-tions towards somewhat greater restraint, but a very moderate movein that direction. A majority of the Committee also felt that the policydirective that had been adopted at the meeting on August 19, andwhich had continued in effect since that time without modification,should be changed to delete the word ''recovery" and to put em-phasis on preventing expansion at an unsustainable rate. Specifically,it was felt by a majority of the Committee that the instruction to con-duct System Account operations "conducive to balanced economicrecovery" was somewhat out of date, and there was agreement on amodification in clause (b) of the first paragraph of the directive toprovide for operations with a view "to fostering conditions in themoney market conducive to sustainable economic growth and stabil-ity." Within this wording, it was believed that a move toward some-what greater restraint on the availability of reserves would beappropriate.
In voting against the change in wording of the directive, Mr.Hayes expressed himself as feeling that a move toward further re-straint was premature at this stage of the recovery and might suggestto the public a policy of progressive tightening and set off an exag-gerated market reaction. Apart from questioning the desirability offurther restraint at this time, Mr. Hayes suggested that, if the Com-mittee believed that policy should be more concerned with a develop-ing threat of inflation than with recovery and that it should make amajor effort to prevent such inflation by credit restraint, the directiveshould be made clear on that particular point.
The Open Market Committee's directive in effect at the beginningof 1958 called for operations with a view to cushioning adjustmentsand mitigating recessionary tendencies in the economy. This waschanged at the March 4 meeting to provide that transactions shouldbe with a view to contributing further by monetary ease to resump-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
70 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
tion of stable growth of the economy. The next change in the direc-tive was made on July 29, but during the period July 18 to July 24the terms of the instruction adopted March 4 were temporarily super-seded when the Committee gave a special authorization for theSystem Account to purchase Government securities, without limita-tion as to amount or maturity, for the purpose of correcting a dis-orderly condition in the Government securities market. That specialauthority having been terminated on July 24, the directive was modi-fied at the meeting on July 29 to specify that operations should bewith a view to recapturing redundant reserves that were expected tobe released to the market August 1. A further instruction adoptedon August 4, by which time the redundant reserves had been recap-tured, called for keeping from having redundant reserves return. Atthe August 19 meeting, the directive was changed to provide foroperations fostering conditions in the money market conducive tobalanced economic recovery. This wording remained unchanged untilthe meeting on December 16, when it was modified to an instructionthat operations be with a view to fostering conditions in the moneymarket conducive to sustainable economic growth and stability. Theform in which the directive was in effect at the end of 1958 providedan instruction to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, until other-wise directed by the Committee;
(1) To make such purchases, sales, or exchanges (including replacementof maturing securities, and allowing maturities to run off without replace-ment) for the System Open Market Account in the open market or, in thecase of maturing securities, by direct exchange with the Treasury, as may benecessary in the light of current and prospective economic conditions andthe general credit situation of the country, with a view (a) to relating thesupply of funds in the market to the needs of commerce and business,(b) to fostering conditions in the money market conducive to sustainableeconomic growth and stability, and (c) to the practical administration ofthe Account; provided that the aggregate amount of securities held in theSystem Account (including commitments for the purchase or sale of securi-ties for the Account) at the close of this date, other than special short-termcertificates of indebtedness purchased from time to time for the temporaryaccommodation of the Treasury, shall not be increased or decreased by morethan $1 billion;
(2) To purchase direct from the Treasury for the account of the FederalReserve Bank of New York (with discretion, in cases where it seems de-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 71
sirable, to issue participations to one or more Federal Reserve Banks) suchamounts of special short-term certificates of indebtedness as may be necessaryfrom time to time for the temporary accommodation of the Treasury; pro-vided that the total amount of such certificates held at any one time by theFederal Reserve Banks shall not exceed in the aggregate $500 million.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
72 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
RECORD OF POLICY ACTIONS
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
January 15, 1958
Reduction in margin requirements.
Effective January 16, 1958, the supplements to Regulation T, Extensionand Maintenance of Credit by Brokers, Dealers, and Members of NationalSecurities Exchanges, and Regulation U, Loans by Banks for the Purpose ofPurchasing or Carrying Stocks Registered on a National Securities Exchange,were amended to reduce the margin requirements from 70 per cent to 50 percent, these requirements to be applicable both to purchases of securities andto short sales.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Balderston, Szymczak,Mills, Robertson, and Shepardson. Votes against this action:none.
For several months prior to this date common stock prices hadbeen moving within a narrow range at a level approximately one-sixth below the peak reached in July 1957, and at this lower rangethe yields on stocks were restored to a point below those availableon high-grade corporate bonds. The price movement was accom-panied by a substantial reduction in stock market credit outstandingwhich, at the end of 1957, was estimated at about $3.6 billion, 10per cent less than in mid-1957 and 5 per cent less than in April1955 when the margin requirements were raised to 70 per cent.With the downward trend of general economic developments re-sulting in a series of rather discouraging business and financialreports, stock market behavior reflected a psychology of caution.
Although the historical record suggested the probability of someincrease in customer debit balances following a margin reduction,it did not appear that such action at this time would be any greatstimulant to stock market activity. Instead, the reaction of investorsseemed likely to depend largely on their appraisal of the over-alleconomic situation.
In these circumstances, a 70 per cent margin requirement couldno longer be justified on the grounds given when that level wasplaced in effect, namely, potential excessive speculative activity andpotential undue use of credit to finance such activity.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 73
January 21, 1958
Reduction in rates on discounts and advances by Federal ReserveBanks.
Effective January 22, 1958, the Board approved action by the Board ofDirectors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia establishing a rate of2% per cent (a reduction from 3 per cent) on discounts for and advances tomember banks under Sections 13 and 13a of the Federal Reserve Act.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Balderston, Mills, andShepardson. Votes against this action: Messrs. Szymczak andRobertson.
Pursuant to the policy established by this action, the Board subsequentlyapproved, effective on the dates indicated, the same rate for the followingFederal Reserve Banks:
24, 1958
24, 1958
24, 1958
24, 1958
24, 1958
24, 1958
28, 1958
28, 1958
7, 1958
14, 1958
Effective the same dates, the Board approved for the respective FederalReserve Banks a rate of 3^4 per cent on advances to member banks underSection 10 (b) of the Federal Reserve Act. In addition, the Board approvedchanges at some of the Banks in rates on advances to individuals, partner-ships, and corporations under the last paragraph of Section 13 of the Act andon industrial loans and commitments under Section 13b.
(In accordance with the provisions of the Federal Reserve Act, the FederalReserve Banks establish, subject to review and determination of the Board ofGovernors, rates on discounts and advances to member banks at least every14 days and submit such rates to the Board for consideration. Prior to thisdate, no changes involving new policy had been made in these rates sincethose referred to on pages 68-70 of the Board's Annual Report for 1957.)
Factual information available to the System by mid-January veri-fied the emergence and progression of recessionary trends. Indus-trial production and employment continued to decline, while unem-
New YorkClevelandRichmondChicagoSt. LouisKansas CityBostonAtlantaMinneapolisDallas
JanuaryJanuaryJanuaryJanuaryJanuaryJanuaryJanuaryJanuaryFebruaryFebruarv
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
74 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
ployment was rising at a disturbing pace. Declining gross nationalproduct was associated closely with a reduction in business plantand equipment expenditures aggravated by inventory liquidation,despite which manufacturers' stock-sales ratios were risingsignificantly.
Federal Reserve policy had started to shift in a counter-recession-ary direction in late October and early November 1957 when openmarket operations began to supply reserves more liberally to thebanking system. In mid-November the discount rate was reducedfrom 3 ^ to 3 per cent. The response of the financial area to theshift in policy was reflected in a sharp decline in interest rates anda substantial increase in bank credit. The interest rate decline,which extended to yields on securities and open market paper butwas not yet pronounced in bank loan or mortgage rates, occurredmost markedly in yields on securities issues that previously hadrisen most, particularly medium-term Treasury issues and State andlocal government issues.
With the accumulating evidence of recessionary tendencies, afurther decrease in the discount rate was deemed an appropriatestep in the execution of System policy designed to encourage creditand monetary expansion. In addition to placing the rate in closeralignment with rates on short-term market instruments, includingthe Treasury bill, the move had the effect of encouraging memberbanks to make any temporary reserve adjustments throughborrowing rather than through credit liquidation.
Governor Szymczak's negative vote reflected administrative ratherthan economic or financial considerations. With the discount ratereduction in November 1957 having been announced just before theannouncement of a Treasury refunding operation, he was appre-hensive that a second such occurrence might create the impressionof a pattern likely to be followed. Accordingly, he would havepreferred to relax through the medium of open market operationsfor the time being and to defer a discount rate change until aftercompletion of the forthcoming Treasury financing operation.
Governor Robertson's negative vote reflected his view that, withthe country having passed only recently through a period of stronginflationary pressures which resulted in a substantial increase inwholesale and consumer prices from which there had as yet been
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 75
no general downward readjustment, a move to ease too rapidlymight place a floor under existing price levels. As he saw it, areduction of the discount rate at this time would have no advantageby way of creating more employment or a higher volume of pro-duction through the utilization of more bank credit. Instead, itmight tend to accentuate fears of a serious recession, or even de-pression, and thereby actually contribute to bringing about such asituation. While the lower discount rate would affect interest rates,he noted that it would not necessarily make additional reservesavailable.
February 19, 1958
Reduction in reserve requirements of member banks.
The supplement to Regulation D, Reserves of Member Banks, wasamended to reduce reserve requirements with respect to net demand depositsof member banks of the Federal Reserve System as follows:
Effective For Per cent
February 27, 1958 Central reserve city banks From 20 to 19^2February 27, 1958 Reserve city banks From 18 to 171/?March 1, 1958 Banks not in central reserve
or reserve cities From 12 to l i y 2
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Balderston, Szymczak,Vardaman, Mills, and Shepardson. Votes against this action:none.
This action released to member banks about $500 million fromrequired reserves. For central reserve city banks, about $125 millionof reserves were released, while for reserve city and country banksthe amounts were in the neighborhood of $195 million and $180million, respectively.
At the time this action was under consideration, industrial pro-duction, employment, income, and retail sales were continuing ona downward trend, while unemployment, on a seasonally adjustedbasis, had risen further. Although total bank loans and invest-ments had increased, this reflected principally larger holdings ofGovernment securities. Business loans had continued to decline.
The reduction of reserve requirements was complementary tosteps being taken actively by the Federal Reserve System through
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
76 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
the use of other policy instruments to foster conditions of creditease during a period of deepening recession and thus to increase thewillingness and ability of the banking system to expand credit. Thefreeing of reserves tended in the direction of reducing the cost offinancing to borrowers and widened the access of potentialborrowers to credit funds.
March 6, 1958
Reduction in rates on discounts and advances by Federal ReserveBanks.
Effective March 7, 1958, the Board approved action by the Boards ofDirectors of the Federal Reserve Banks of New York, Philadelphia, andChicago establishing a rate of 2 ^ pe*" cent (a reduction from 2% per cent)on discounts for and advances to member banks under Sections 13 and 13a ofthe Federal Reserve Act.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Balderston, Szymczak,Vardaman, Mills, and Shepardson. Votes against this action:none.
Pursuant to the policy established by this action, the Board subsequentlyapproved, effective on the dates indicated, the same rate for the followingFederal Reserve Banks:
AtlantaBostonSan FranciscoClevelandRichmondSt. LouisKansas CityDallasMinneapolis
March 10, 1958March 11, 1958March 13, 19581
March 14, 1958March 14, 1958March 14, 1958March 14, 1958March 14, 1958March 21, 1958
Effective the same dates, the Board approved for the respective FederalReserve Banks a rate of 2% per cent on advances to member banks underSection 10 (b) of the Federal Reserve Act. In addition, the Board approvedchanges at some of the Banks in rates on advances to individuals, partner-ships, and corporations under the last paragraph of Section 13 of the Actand on industrial loans and commitments under Section 13b.
deduction from 3 per cent.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 77
In early March economic activity was continuing to recede. Thedecline in industrial production had by this time carried to a point10 per cent below the peak reached in the summer of 1957, inven-tory liquidation continued to be substantial, particularly in durablegoods lines, and retail trade had worsened perceptibly. With sub-stantial cancellations of previously approved appropriations re-ported, the prospective level of business plant and equipment ex-penditures for 1958 was around 10 per cent lower than expendi-tures during 1957. Unemployment on a seasonally adjusted basiswas estimated to be running at about 6.7 per cent of the labor force,a rate comparable to that reached in 1949. The composite of avail-able economic information suggested the possibility that the currentrecession might develop to be less moderate in extent or durationthan either the 1948-49 or the 1953-54 recessions.
Reflecting to a large extent Federal Reserve policy of providinga generous supply of reserves, member banks had been able notonly to get substantially out of debt at the Reserve Banks but alsoto expand credit contrary to usual seasonal trends. In the face ofa net liquidation of business loans, this expansion was being accom-plished by placement of funds in securities and in loans on securi-ties. Bank purchases of securities were providing funds directly orindirectly to the United States Treasury to meet the growing deficitincidental to the recession, as well as to State and local governmentsand corporations borrowing in capital markets and to borrowers onhome mortgages. Due to the easier reserve position of banks andthe resulting increase in the availability of lendable funds relativeto current demands, there was a sharp further decline in short-terminterest rates and the rate on Treasury bills had fallen to around
per cent.
In these circumstances, the action to reduce the discount rate toper cent was not of particular immediate significance from the
standpoint of member bank borrowing. However, it brought thediscount rate into better alignment with short-term interest rates,reflected the general attitude of System policy at this stage of therecession, and tended toward a position that would afford the Systemgreater flexibility of adjustment to future developments.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
78 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
March 18, 1958
Reduction in reserve requirements of member banks.
The supplement to Regulation D, Reserves of Member Banks, wasamended to reduce reserve requirements with respect to net demand depositsof member banks of the Federal Reserve System as follows:
Effective For Per centMarch 20, 1958 Central reserve city banks From 19V2 t o *9March 20, 1958 Reserve city banks From 17*/2 to 17April 1, 1958 Banks not in central reserve
or reserve cities From Hl/2 to 11
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Balderston, Vardaman,Mills, Robertson, and Shepardson. Votes against this action:none.
This action released about $490 million from required reserves,with the pattern of distribution approximately as follows: centralreserve city banks $125 million; reserve city banks $190 million; andcountry banks $175 million.
This second reduction of reserve requirements, viewed in associa-tion with earlier discount rate changes and the provision of reservesthrough open market operations, reflected furtherance of a Systempolicy designed in its over-all aspects to foster ease in credit marketsas the course of recession carried major business indices to lowerlevels. Taken together, the succeeding steps of Federal Reservepolicy enabled member banks further to reduce their discounts atthe Reserve Banks, served to offset the reserve drain involved in acontinuing outflow of gold from the United States, and offered themeans of financing a substantial commercial bank credit expansion.With the release of required reserves, member banks were able notonly to meet seasonal loan demands but at the same time to continueadding to their holdings of United States Government securities.
April 17, 1958
Reduction in reserve requirements of member banks.
The supplement to Regulation D, Reserves of Member Banks, wasamended to reduce reserve requirements with respect to net demand depositsof member banks of the Federal Reserve System as follows:
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 7 9
Effective For Per cent
April 17, 1958 Central reserve city banks From 19 to 18l/2
April 24, 1958 Central reserve city banks From 18y2 to 18April 24, 1958 Reserve city banks From 17 to l6l/2
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Szymczak, Mills,Robertson, and Shepardson. Votes against this action: none.
The effect of this action, the third in a series of reductions in re-serve requirements, was to release about $450 million from requiredreserves. For central reserve city banks the reduction which becameeffective April 17 released about $130 million of reserves, and thereduction effective April 24 released approximately the sameamount. For reserve city banks, the effect was to free about $190million of required reserves.
Nearly $1 billion of reserves had been released by the two pre-ceding reductions in reserve requirements, and additional reserveshad been supplied by System open market operations during thepast several weeks. However, a substantial part of the reservesthus provided had been absorbed by increased requirements result-ing from a contra-seasonal growth in bank deposits, a larger thanseasonal increase in currency in circulation, foreign operations(principally gold withdrawals), and float and other factors. In ad-dition, free reserves of member banks had increased to a leveldeemed consistent with Federal Reserve policy objectives at thisparticular stage and depth of the recession. In view of the likeli-hood of a further gold drain, a prospective increase in required re-serves resulting from payment by banks for a new Treasury issue,and an indicated increase in demand deposits of at least seasonalmagnitude, it was estimated that some $300 million additional re-serves would have to be supplied within the near future to maintaina condition of ease conducive to further credit and monetaryexpansion.
This action was taken in recognition of the prospective need foradditional reserves and to relieve pressures that were appearing onthe reserve positions of central reserve and, to a somewhat lesserextent, reserve city banks. Some members felt that the existing situ-ation afforded an opportunity to reduce the level of reserve require-ments at a time when such action was consistent with credit policy
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
80 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
and at the same time further to enlarge the area of flexibility forSystem action should it become necessary at some future date toinstitute a policy of credit restraint in the light of changed economicconditions.
April 17, 1958
Reduction in rates on discounts and advances by Federal ReserveBanks.
Effective April 18, 1958, the Board approved actions by the Boards ofDirectors of the Federal Reserve Banks of New York, Philadelphia, Chicago,St. Louis, and Minneapolis establishing a rate of 1% per cent (a reductionfrom 2^4 p e r cent) on discounts for and advances to member banks underSections 13 and 13a of the Federal Reserve Act.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Szymczak, Mills,Robertson, and Shepardson. Votes against this action: none.
Pursuant to the policy established by this action, the Board subsequentlyapproved, effective on the dates indicated, the same rate for the followingFederal Reserve Banks:
BostonAtlantaClevelandRichmondKansas CitySan FranciscoDallas
AprilAprilAprilAprilAprilMayMay
22, 195822, 195825, 195825, 195825, 1958
1, 19589, 1958
Effective the same dates, the Board approved for the respective FederalReserve Banks' a rate of 2 ^ p e r c e n t on advances to member banks underSection 10 (b) of the Federal Reserve Act. In addition, the Board approvedchanges at some of the Banks in rates on advances to individuals, partner-ships, and corporations under the last paragraph of Section 13 of the Actand on industrial loans and commitments under Section 13b.
By mid-April, data becoming available to the System suggestedsome slowing in the pace of decline of output and employment.There were, in fact, developments in certain segments of the econ-omy such as to create the impression of more diversity of trendsthan had been the case earlier. Nevertheless, the sum of statisticalevidence indicated that the general movement continued to be one
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 81
of downward drift. In reflection of a System policy of ease, therehad been a rapid expansion of bank credit while short- and medium-term interest rates had declined further and reached their lowestlevels since early 1955.
This further action served to narrow the discrepancy between thediscount rate and money market rates, including the Treasury billrate, and provided assurance to member banks of a ready availa-bility of funds at the lower rate in the event of need. The concur-rent actions on the discount rate and on reserve requirements placedmonetary policy clearly in the posture of doing everything possibleto assist in the turnaround and recovery of the economy.
August 4, 1958
Increase in margin requirements.
Effective August 5, 1958, the supplements to Regulation T, Extension andMaintenance of Credit by Brokers, Dealers, and Members of National Securi-ties Exchanges, and Regulation U, Loans by Banks for the Purpose of Pur-chasing or Carrying Stocks Registered on a National Securities Exchange,were amended to increase the margin requirements from 50 per cent to 70per cent, these requirements to be applicable both to purchases of securitiesand to short sales.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Balderston, Vardaman,Mills, and Shepardson. Votes against this action: none.
By this date there was clear statistical evidence that recovery ineconomic activity and production had gained considerable momen-tum and was likely to go forward. The recovery was accompaniedby a rise in stock prices sufficient to carry common stock yields belowyields on bonds of the same companies, and by a sharp increase inthe volume of stock market credit which by July had reached a levelsome 20 per cent higher than at the beginning of the year. In viewof this rapid rise in credit and the re-emergence of an investmentpsychology favoring the purchase of stocks as a hedge against poten-tial inflation, which would be a particular inducement to borrowingfor the purpose, the margin requirements were restored to the 70per cent level that had prevailed prior to the middle of January.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
82 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
August 14, 1958
Increase in rates on discounts and advances by Federal ReserveBanks.
Effective August 15, 1958, the Board approved action by the Board ofDirectors of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco establishing a rateof 2 per cent (an increase from 1% per cent) on discounts for and advancesto member banks under Sections 13 and 13a of the Federal Reserve Act.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Balderston, Vardaman,and Shepardson. Votes against this action: none.
Pursuant to the policy established by this action, the Board subsequentlyapproved, effective on the dates indicated, the same rate for the followingFederal Reserve Banks:
Dallas August 22, 1958Atlanta August 26, 1958Kansas City August 29, 1958Chicago September 5, 1958Minneapolis September 5, 1958New York September 12, 1958Cleveland September 12, 1958Richmond September 12, 1958St. Louis September 12, 1958Philadelphia September 19, 1958Boston September 23, 1958
Effective the same dates, the Board approved for the respective FederalReserve Banks a rate of 2l/2 per cent on advances to member banks underSection 10 (b) of the Federal Reserve Act. In addition, the Board approvedchanges at some of the Banks in rates on advances to individuals, partner-ships, and corporations under the last paragraph of Section 13 of the Act andon industrial loans and commitments under Section 13b.
Increasing evidence of vigorous economic recovery on a broadfront was visible by the early part of August. By July, the seasonallyadjusted index of industrial production had risen six points fromthe low of 128 reached in April, with the improvement in outputdiffused through durable and nondurable goods industries. Construc-tion activity, already quite strong, increased further in July as privatehousing starts rose for the fifth successive month and attained aseasonally adjusted rate close to 1.2 million units, almost 15 per centhigher than the rate a year earlier. Personal income in June was back
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 83
nearly to the level of August 1957, and it was estimated to havereached further ahead in July. In the first six months of the year,farm income had attained its highest level since 1953, and on thebasis of crop and marketing prospects it seemed likely to rise furtherin the months ahead. Wholesale prices, advancing since mid-June,had by August exceeded the peak reached in March 1958, andconsumer demand was strong.
The improved economic outlook and the prospect of a large Fed-eral deficit for the current fiscal year led to a sharpening of expecta-tions with regard to a renewal of inflationary pressures and to a re-versal in the trend of interest rates. The yield on Treasury billsrebounded strongly from the low point reached in June and by thefirst part of August was in the neighborhood of 11/2 per cent.
In view of these developments, System open market operations hadbeen modified so as to supply only a portion of the reserves neededto meet rising credit demands and offset the reserve drain of a con-tinued gold outflow. As a result, member banks were obliged todraw down their excess reserves and to begin to increase their bor-rowings at the Federal Reserve Banks. The discount rate adjustmentmade such borrowings more costly.
October 15, 1958
Increase in margin requirements.
Effective October 16, 1958, the supplements to Regulation T, Extensionand Maintenance of Credit by Brokers, Dealers, and Members of NationalSecurities Exchanges, and Regulation U, Loans by Banks for the Purpose ofPurchasing or Carrying Stocks Registered on a National Securities Exchange,were amended to increase the margin requirements from 70 per cent to 90per cent, these requirements to be applicable to both purchases and shortsales.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Balderston, Szymczak, Mills,and Shepardson. Votes against this action: Mr. Robertson.
Following the increase in margin requirements from 50 per cent to70 per cent early in August, common stock prices continued theirupward climb in a heavy volume of trading activity and had nowregistered a further advance of about 8 per cent. By October thisprice movement had carried common stock yields to a level morethan half a percentage point below the average yield on high-grade
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
84 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
corporate bonds. After a pause in August, stock market credit like-wise resumed its upward thrust and latest estimates placed thevolume of total customer credit at above $4.3 billion. In addition,the number of open margin accounts was reported to have increasedconsiderably from June to September.
Prevalent psychology, favoring equities, including those of a specu-lative character, as a medium of investment in preference to fixed-income obligations, appeared to reflect not only growing public con-fidence in continued business improvement but apprehension as to anintensification of inflationary pressures. In light of the developmentsin the market, the margin requirements were increased to 90 per centat this time pursuant to the Board's statutory responsibility for ad-ministering those requirements with a view to preventing the ex-cessive use of credit for purchasing or carrying registered stocks.
Governor Robertson voted against this action for the followingreasons:
(1) Under withdrawal and substitution rules in effect at that time,a customer selling securities in a margin account was free to purchasean equal market value of securities or to withdraw the margincurrently required on such a purchase. Thus, if he sold $1,000 ofsecurities, he could replace them with a $1,000 purchase of securities,or he could withdraw $700 in cash under a 70 per cent margin re-quirement or $900 under a 90 per cent margin requirement. Con-sequently, Governor Robertson felt, the increased margin require-ments would apply in practice only to new extensions of credit andnot to the turnover of credit already in the market. It would fail,he believed, to reach the most important aspect at that time of the"excessive use of credit" and would therefore be a relatively futileand ineffective action, the psychological effect of which might be thereverse of that intended.
(2) Also because of the then existing withdrawal and substitu-tion rules, the increased margin requirements would unjustifiably en-large the inequity as between customers who could continue to tradeon lower margins and new customers subject to higher margins.
(3) The higher margin requirements, coupled with the existingwithdrawal and substitution rules, would tend to encourage a weak-ening of margin accounts and create dangers of cumulative forcedselling in undermargined accounts if stock prices should fall.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 85
October 23, 1958
Increase in rates on discounts and advances by Federal ReserveBanks.
Effective October 24, 1958, the Board approved action by the Boards ofDirectors of the Federal Reserve Banks of Philadelphia, Richmond, St. Louis,Minneapolis, and Dallas establishing a rate of 2 ^ p e r cent (an increase from2 per cent) on discounts for and advances to member banks under Sections13 and 13a of the Federal Reserve Act.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Balderston, Szymczak, Robert-son, and Shepardson. Votes against this action: none.
Pursuant to the policy established by this action, the Board subsequentlyapproved, effective on the dates indicated, the same rate for the followingFederal Reserve Banks:
AtlantaClevelandChicagoBostonKansas CitySan FranciscoNew York
OctoberOctoberOctoberNovemberNovemberNovemberNovember
28, 195830, 195831, 19584, 19584, 19586, 19587, 1958
Effective the same dates, the Board approved for the respective FederalReserve Banks a rate of 3 per cent on advances to member banks under Sec-tion 10 (b) of the Federal Reserve Act. In addition, the Board approvedchanges at some of the Banks in rates on advances to individuals, partner-ships, and corporations under the last paragraph of Section 13 of the Actand on industrial loans and commitments under Section 13b.
During the period since the previous discount rate increase inAugust, the economy had continued its trend toward recovery, withfurther advances in industrial production, construction activity, retailsales, and personal income. Although average wholesale pricesshowed stability, prices of basic industrial materials were movingupward. Currency in circulation, bank credit, and deposits each re-flected a seasonal rise. Short-term interest rates, which began toadvance rapidly after midyear, continued that trend, reflecting in partsubstantial cash borrowing on the part of the Treasury in the formof short-term securities and also anticipation of further growth incredit demands. By the middle of October, the yield on three-month
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
86 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Treasury bills had risen to a level around 2% per cent. Seasonalmonetary needs were estimated to require a further growth of over$4 billion in total bank credit by the end of the calendar year, whilethe Treasury was scheduled to undertake shortly a series of financingoperations that would involve, through the end of the year, borrow-ing additional cash of around $4 billion and refunding some $12billion of outstanding securities. Other pressures also tending to in-fluence the trend toward a higher structure of interest rates includedgrowing apprehension concerning potential inflationary developmentsand a continued tendency to shift from fixed-return assets to equities.
With the discount rate having fallen substantially out of line withshort-term money market rates, and with influences present such as tosuggest the probability of a further distortion of the normal relation-ship, the increase in the rate served to produce a better alignmentand at the same time recognized existing trends in the money marketand the economy generally.
November 12, 1958
Amendment to Regulation K, Corporations Doing Foreign Bankingor Other Foreign Financing under the Federal Reserve Act.
Effective November 12, 1958, Regulation K was amended by deletingSection 10 (c) (2) and the reference thereto contained in Section 3(b).
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Balderston, Szymczak,Mills, Robertson, and Shepardson. Votes against this action:none.
Section 10 (c) of Regulation K, as revised January 15, 1957, con-tained a provision that "no Financing Corporation hereafter organ-ized shall have a name which is similar to the name of, or identifiesthe Corporation with, any bank in the United States with which suchFinancing Corporation is affiliated." Section 3(b), relating to namesof corporations organized under Section 25 (a) of the Federal ReserveAct, contained a reference to the aforementioned provision of Sec-tion 10 (c).
In the light of experience with the administration of the revisedRegulation K, the Board concluded that the provision in question wasunduly restrictive and unnecessary in the public interest. Pursuant toSection 3(b), the name of any corporation organized under Section
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 8 7
25 (a) continued to be subject to the approval of the Board ofGovernors. Further, the same section also provides that in no caseshall the name of such a corporation resemble the name of any othercorporation to an extent that might result in misleading or deceivingthe public as to the corporation's identity, purpose, connections, oraffiliations. In addition, the name of any corporation organized underSection 25 (a) shall, so far as practicable, indicate the nature of thebusiness contemplated and shall include the word "international,""foreign," "overseas," or some similar word. No financing corpora-tion is permitted to have the word "bank" or "banking," or anysimilar word, as part of its name.
December 18, 1958
Actions incident to admission of Alaska to Statehood.
Effective upon issuance by the President of the United States of a procla-mation admitting Alaska to Statehood, which proclamation subsequently wasissued on January 3, 1959, the Board readjusted the Federal Reserve dis-tricts so as to include the State of Alaska in the Twelfth District, and withinthat District included Alaska in the Territory of the Seattle Branch of theFederal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Effective the same date, certainamendments were made to several regulations of the Board to correctlanguage rendered inappropriate by the admission of Alaska to Statehood.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Martin, Szymczak, Mills, andRobertson. Votes against this action: none.
Section 2 of the Federal Reserve Act provides that the FederalReserve districts, as created originally by the Reserve Bank Organiza-tion Committee, may be readjusted from time to time by the Boardof Governors of the Federal Reserve System, not to exceed 12 in all.Section 19 of the Alaska Statehood Act amended the aforesaid Sec-tion 2 to provide that "when the State of Alaska is hereafter admittedto the Union the Federal Reserve districts shall be readjusted by theBoard of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in such manneras to include such State/' In anticipation of a Presidential proclama-tion admitting Alaska to Statehood, the Board therefore took actionto include Alaska in the Twelfth Federal Reserve District coincidentwith the date of the proclamation.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
88 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Regulations relating to branches of Federal Reserve Banks, whichare prescribed under the authority of Section 3 of the Federal ReserveAct, provide that no change shall be made by any Federal ReserveBank in the territory included within the district served by any of itsbranches except with the prior approval or upon the direction of theBoard of Governors. Pursuant to these regulations, the Board pro-vided that the State of Alaska, upon admission to the Union, beincluded in the territory of the Seattle Branch of the Federal ReserveBank of San Francisco.
Certain technical changes in a number of Board regulations weremade, effective the same date, because the admission of Alaska toStatehood rendered the existing language inappropriate. The regula-tions affected included G, Collection of Noncash Items; H, Member-ship of State Banking Institutions in the Federal Reserve System;J, Check Clearing and Collection; and U, Loans by Banks for thePurpose of Purchasing or Carrying Stocks Registered on a NationalSecurities Exchange.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 89
BANK SUPERVISION BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Examination of Federal Reserve Banks, The Board's Divisionof Examinations examined each of the 12 Federal Reserve Banksand their 24 branches during the year as required by law. In con-junction with their annual examination of the Federal Reserve Bankof New York, the Board's examiners also made a detailed auditof the accounts and holdings of the System Open Market Accountmaintained at that Bank, and rendered a report thereon to the FederalOpen Market Committee. The techniques and procedures employedby the Board's examiners were surveyed and appraised by a privatefirm of certified public accountants during the course of the examina-tion of a Federal Reserve Bank of its selection.
Examination of member banks. Although authorized to examineall member banks, both State and national, as a matter of practiceneither the Federal Reserve Banks nor the Board of Governorsexamines national banks since the Comptroller of the Currency isdirectly charged with that responsibility by law. Reports of examina-tions made by the Comptroller are furnished the respective FederalReserve Banks and made available to the Board of Governors.Likewise, because all member banks are insured, the Federal DepositInsurance Corporation is empowered to make special examinationsof national banks and State member banks. However, such exam-inations have been rare and have been made only in anticipation offinancial assistance by the Corporation in a rehabilitation programor where a member bank desired to continue as an insured bankafter withdrawal from membership in the System. Reports of exam-ination of both national banks and State member banks are madeavailable to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
State member banks are subject to examinations made by direc-tion of the Board of Governors or of the Federal Reserve Banks byexaminers selected or approved by the Board of Governors. The es-tablished policy is to conduct at least one regular examination of eachState member bank, including its trust department, during each calen-dar year, by examiners for the Reserve Bank of the district in whichthe bank is situated, with additional examinations if considered de-sirable. Here again, in order to avoid duplication and to minimizeinconvenience to the banks examined, wherever practicable jointexaminations are made in cooperation with the State banking au-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
90 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
thorities or alternate examinations are made by agreement with Stateauthorities. The 1958 program for the examination of State memberbanks was practically completed, since only 9 of the 1,734 banks werenot examined during the calendar year.
Federal Reserve membership. The 6,312 banks that were mem-bers of the Federal Reserve System at the end of 1958 accounted for47 per cent of the number and held 85 per cent of the deposits ofall commercial banks in the United States. State member banksaccounted for 20 per cent of the number of all State commercialbanks and held 66 per cent of the deposits of these banks.
The 4,578 national and 1,734 State member banks comprisingFederal Reserve membership reflected declines of 42 and 39, re-spectively, from the previous year-end. This continuing decline waslargely due to consolidations and mergers; other reductions include15 State member banks that withdrew from membership, and onenational bank that became a nonmember bank. The decrease waspartly offset by 19 newly established national and two newly es-tablished State member banks, the admission of seven nonmemberbanks to membership, and the conversion of three nonmember banksinto national banks.
The total number of member bank offices increased as a result ofboth the conversion of merged banks into branches and the estab-lishment of de novo branches. At the end of the year member bankswere operating 6,700 branches, 535 more than at the close of 1957.
Detailed figures on changes in the banking structure for the year1958 are shown in Table 18 on page 127.
Bank holding companies. During 1958, pursuant to Section3 ( a ) ( l ) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, the Boardapproved one application for prior approval of action to become abank holding company, and denied three such applications, thelatter three being involved in a proposal that would have resultedin one continuing bank holding company. Pursuant to Section3 (a) (2) of the Act, the Board approved the acquisition by threebank holding companies of voting shares of four banks and deniedone application for such acquisition with respect to one bank. UnderSection 4(c)(6) of the Act, the Board, after a hearing, denied arequest for a determination that certain subsidiaries of a bank hold-ing company were so closely related to the banking activities of the
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 91
holding company system as to be a proper incident thereto and asto make it unnecessary for the prohibitions of Section 4 to apply inorder to carry out the purposes of the Act; one such request wasapproved. During the year the Board issued four certifications inaccordance with the tax provisions of the Act (Internal RevenueCode, Sections 1101 and 1103). To provide necessary current in-formation, annual reports for the year 1957 were obtained fromregistered bank holding companies.
During 1958, pursuant to the Banking Act of 1933, the Boardauthorized the issuance of five voting permits for general purposesand 13 permits for limited purposes to holding company affiliatesof member banks. In accordance with established practice, a numberof holding company affiliates were examined during the year byexaminers for the Federal Reserve Banks in whose districts theprincipal offices of the holding companies are located.
Section 301 of the Banking Act of 1935 provides that the term"holding company affiliate" shall not include, except for the purposesof Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act, any organization whichis determined by the Board not to be engaged, directly or indirectly,as a business in holding the stock of, or managing or controlling,banks, banking associations, savings banks, or trust companies.During the year the Board made such determinations with respect toseven organizations.
Trust powers of national banks. During 1958, 42 national bankswere granted authority by the Board to exercise one or more trustpowers under the provisions of Section 11 (k) of the Federal Re-serve Act. This number includes the grant of additional powersto five banks which previously had been granted certain trust powers.One additional national bank acquired trust powers as a result ofconsolidation. Trust powers of 31 national banks were terminatedby voluntary liquidation, consolidation, merger, or conversion. Atthe end of 1958, there were 1,722 national banks holding permitsto exercise trust powers.
Acceptance powers of member banks. During the year theBoard approved applications of two member banks, pursuant to theprovisions of Section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act, for increasedacceptance powers. One member bank was granted permission toaccept commercial drafts or bills of exchange to an amount not
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
92 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
exceeding at any time, in the aggregate, 100 per cent of its paid-upand unimpaired capital stock and surplus, and the application of onemember bank was approved for limited permission to accept draftsor bills of exchange drawn for the purpose of furnishing dollarexchange as required by the usages of trade in Brazil.
Foreign branches and foreign banking and financing corpora-tions. Under the provisions of Section 25 of the Federal ReserveAct, the Board approved during 1958 seven applications made bymember banks for permission to establish branches in foreign coun-tries and overseas areas of the United States. One member bankopened a branch in Bayamon, Puerto Rico; and another openedbranches in Asuncion, Paraguay, and Valencia, Venezuela. TheValencia branch had been authorized by the Board in 1957. Onemember bank closed one of its branches in London.
At the end of 1958, seven member banks had in active operationa total of 119 branches in 27 foreign countries and overseas areasof the United States. Of the 119 branches, three national bankswere operating 93 and four State member banks were operating26. The branches were distributed geographically as follows:
Latin America 62 Near East 4Argentina 10 Egypt 1Brazil 10 Lebanon 2Chile 2 Saudi Arabia 1Colombia 4Cuba 21 Far East 20Mexico 3 H o n g K o n £ 1
Panama 5 I n d i a 2
Paraguay 1 J a P a n 1 0
Peru 1 Philippines 5Uruguay 1 Singapore 1Venezuela 4 Thailand 1
Continental Europe 5 United States Overseas Areas. 18Belgium 1 Canal Zone 4France 3 Guam 1Germany 1 Puerto Rico 13
England 10 Total 119
There was no change in 1958 in the list of corporations organizedunder State laws which operate under agreements with the Boardpursuant to Section 25 of the Federal Reserve Act relating to in-vestment by member banks in the stock of corporations engaged
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 93
principally in international or foreign banking. The head offices inNew York of the three "agreement" corporations were examinedin 1958 by examiners for the Board of Governors. One corporationoperates a branch in France; one has an English fiduciary affiliate;and one operates two agencies at the New York International Air-port, has a branch in England, owns all the stock of a bank organizedunder the laws of, and operating in, Liberia, and owns all the stockof a bank organized under the laws of, and operating in, the Unionof South Africa. The investment in the latter bank was authorizedby the Board and the bank opened in Johannesburg in 1958.
During 1958 one corporation was chartered by the Board underthe provisions of Section 25 (a) of the Federal Reserve Act to engagein international or foreign financing, making a total of five corpora-tions engaged in international or foreign banking or financing inactive operation at the end of the year, two of which are regardedas "Banking Corporations" and three as "Financing Corporations."The home offices of these five corporations are located in New YorkCity, and four were examined during the year by examiners for theBoard of Governors. Three corporations have no subsidiaries orforeign branches; one has a branch in France and an English fiduciaryaffiliate which has a branch in Canada; and one operates branchesin France, Germany, Guatemala, Lebanon, and Singapore (withbranches in Hong Kong and the Federation of Malaya authorizedby the Board in 1958 but not opened by the end of the year)', andowns substantially all of the stock of a bank organized under thelaws of, and operating in, Italy.
In 1958, examiners for the Board of Governors examined theSingapore, Colony of Singapore, and Beirut, Lebanon, branches of aforeign banking corporation, and the Japanese and Beirut, Lebanon,branches of a State member bank. The London branches of anotherState member bank were surveyed at the head office of the bank inNew York by examiners for the Board of Governors.
Inter-Agency Bank Examination School. During 1958, twosessions of the School for Examiners and four sessions of the Schoolfor Assistant Examiners were held. The Inter-Agency Bank Exam-ination School is conducted in Washington by the Board of Gov-ernors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit InsuranceCorporation, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
94 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Since the Inter-Agency School was established in 1952, the varioussessions have been attended by 1,064 men, representing the threeFederal bank supervisory agencies, the State Banking Departmentsof California, Connecticut, Indiana, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan,Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York,North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Vir-ginia, the Treasury Department of the Commonwealth of PuertoRico, and one foreign country.
LEGISLATION
Defense Production Act. The Defense Production Act of 1950,Section 301 of which is the basis for guarantees of loans for defenseproduction, which would have expired June 30, 1958, was amendedand continued in force until the close of June 30, I960, by the Actof June 28, 1958.
Purchase of Government obligations by Federal Reserve Banks.The authority of the Federal Reserve Banks under Section 14 (b)of the Federal Reserve Act to purchase and sell direct or fullyguaranteed obligations of the United States directly from or to theUnited States, which would have expired on June 30, 1958, wasextended until June 30, I960, by the Act of June 30, 1958.
Alaskan Statehood. The Alaskan Statehood Act of July 7, 1958amended Section 2 of the Federal Reserve Act to provide that uponadmission of Alaska to Statehood the Federal Reserve districts shouldbe readjusted so as to include such State, and to require nationalbanks in any new State to become members of the Federal ReserveSystem within 90 days after admission of such State into the Union.Pursuant to the requirements of this amendment, the Board subse-quently readjusted the Federal Reserve districts so as to include theState of Alaska in the Twelfth Federal Reserve District effectiveJanuary 3, 1959.
Real estate loans by national banks. Section 24 of the FederalReserve Act was amended by the Act of July 18, 1958 so as to makethe limitations and restrictions of that section on real estate loansby national banks inapplicable to loans made to established indus-trial or commercial businesses in which the Small Business Adminis-tration cooperates through agreements to participate on an immediateor deferred basis.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 95
Small Business Investment Act. Section 13b of the Federal Re-serve Act, authorizing working capital loans and commitments bythe Federal Reserve Banks for industrial or commercial businesses,was repealed by the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, ap-proved August 21, 1958, to become effective one year after the dateof enactment of that Act. The same Act provided for payment bythe Federal Reserve Banks to the United States within 60 days afterthe date of its enactment of amounts previously paid by the Secre-tary of the Treasury to the Federal Reserve Banks under the pro-visions of Section 13b of the Federal Reserve Act. In addition, theAct of August 21, 1958 made stock of small business investmentcompanies organized under that Act eligible for purchase by na-tional banks and by other member banks and nonmember insuredbanks to the extent permitted by State law, subject to certain limita-tions.
Bank Holding Company Act. The Board is required by Section5(d) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 to include in itsannual report to Congress any recommendations for changes in thatAct which, in the opinion of the Board, would be desirable. In aspecial report submitted to Congress on May 7, 1958 the Boardrecommended a number of amendments to the Bank Holding Com-pany Act which would tend to clarify ambiguities in the law andfacilitate its administration. The Board continues to urge favorableconsideration of those amendments.
RESERVE BANK OPERATIONS
Loan guarantees for defense production. Under the provisionsof the Defense Production Act of 1950 as amended and the imple-menting Executive Orders, certain designated procurement agenciesof the Government are authorized to guarantee loans made by com-mercial banks and other private financing institutions to finance andexpedite production for national defense and to finance contractorsand subcontractors in connection with or in contemplation of ter-mination of their defense contracts. The guaranteeing agencies arethe Departments of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Commerce, Interior,and Agriculture, the General Services Administration, and theAtomic Energy Commission.
The present program is a reactivation of the V-loan program
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
96 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
utilized during World War II. In the making of guarantees, theFederal Reserve Banks are authorized to act, on behalf of theguaranteeing agencies, as fiscal agents of the United States, subjectto the supervision of the Board of Governors of the Federal ReserveSystem; and the Board is authorized, after consultation with theguaranteeing agencies, to prescribe rates and fees and forms andprocedures. The schedule of rates and fees was reviewed from timeto time by the Board and guaranteeing agencies but developmentsduring 1958 did not indicate the need for any changes.
During 1958, the guaranteeing agencies authorized the issuance of40 guarantee agreements amounting to $193 million. On Decem-ber 31, 1958, guarantee agreements outstanding covered creditstotaling $478 million, of which amount $310 million representedactual loans outstanding and $168 million was available to borrowersunder guarantee agreements in force. Of the total credit availableto borrowers, including loans outstanding, 74 per cent on the averagewas guaranteed. During the year, approximately $728 million wasadvanced on V-loans, most of which are revolving credits.
From the beginning of the program in September 1950 throughDecember 31, 1958, 1,543 V-loans totaling $3,105 million wereauthorized by the procurement agencies which may guarantee suchloans under the Defense Production Act of 1950. Of the total loansauthorized, 56 per cent of the number and 6 per cent of the amountwere less than $500,000 and 72 per cent of the number and 12 percent of the amount were less than $1 million.
Forty-two per cent of the number and 7 per cent of the amount ofloans authorized were to borrowers having assets of less than$500,000; 57 per cent of the number and 12 per cent of the amountwere to borrowers having assets of less than $1 million.
Seventy-three per cent of the number and 19 per cent of theamount of loans authorized were to borrowers having less than 500employees.
Under the law as amended by the Defense Production Act amend-ments of 1958, authority for the V-loan program, unless furtherextended, will terminate on June 30, I960.
Volume of operations. Table 5 on page 113 shows the volumeof operations in the principal departments of the Federal ReserveBanks for the years 1954-58. Changes from 1957 were mixed, with
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 97
some activities decreasing and others increasing. Discounts and ad-vances and currency received and counted declined. On the otherhand, checks (other than Government checks and Postal moneyorders), coin, and transfers of funds increased and reached newpeaks; checks handled, however, increased less than in recent years.
Earnings and expenses. Current earnings, current expenses, andthe distribution of net earnings of each Federal Reserve Bank during1958 are shown in detail in Table 6 on pages 114-15, and a con-densed historical statement is shown in Table 7 on pages 116-17.The table below summarizes the earnings and expenses and the dis-tribution of net earnings for 1958 and 1957.
EARNINGS, EXPENSES, AND DISTRIBUTION OF N E T EARNINGS OFFEDERAL RESERVE BANKS, 1958 AND 1957
[In thousands of dollars]
Item 1958 1957
Current earnings.Current expenses.
742,068137,722
763,348131,814
Current net earnings. 604,346 631,534
Additions to current net earnings1
Deductions from current net earnings
Net additions or deductions (—)
Net earnings before payments to U. S. Treasury.
Paid U. S. Treasury (interest on F. R. notes)Dividends paidTransferred to surplus
454330
1,58028,721
124 -7,141
604,470 624,393
524,05921,19759,214
542,70820,08161,604
1 Includes net profits of $157,000 in 1958 and $167,000 in 1957 on sales of U. S.Government securities.
2 Includes a payment of $8,335,000 to Federal Reserve retirement system repre-senting adjustment for revised benefits.
Current earnings of $742 million in 1958 were 3 per cent lessthan in 1957, largely because lower discount rates coupled withfewer borrowings resulted in a $20 million decrease in earningsfrom this source. Earnings from United States Government securi-ties were $1 million less than in the year before, reflecting a loweraverage yield offset in part by a slight increase in average holdings.Current expenses of $138 million were about 4 per cent above 1957.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
98 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Current net earnings amounted to $604 million, a decrease of 4per cent from 1957.
The effect of profit and loss additions and deductions was minor,leaving net earnings before payments to the United States Treasuryat about $604 million, a decrease of 3 per cent from 1957.
Statutory dividends to member banks amounted to $21 million,or a rise of about $1 million over 1957, reflecting increases in capi-tal and surplus of member banks with attendant increases in thepaid-in capital of the Federal Reserve Banks.
Payments to the United States Treasury as interest on Federal Re-serve notes amounted to $524 million in 1958. This was 90 per centof net earnings after dividends and allowance for building upsurplus to 100 per cent of subscribed capital where surplus wasbelow that amount. This allowance is consistent with the provisionsof the franchise tax when it was in effect; for 1958 the allowancefor bringing surplus up to subscribed capital was $986,000 for twoBanks and for 1957 the total was $1,303,000 for one Bank. Totalpayments to the Treasury as interest on Federal Reserve notes sincethe policy of making such payments was begun in 1947 haveamounted to $3,517 million.
Net earnings of $59 million remaining after dividends and pay-ments to the United States Treasury were added to surplus account.
On September 2, 1958, the Federal Reserve Banks repaid to theSecretary of the Treasury the aggregate of $27,546,310.97 pursuantto the provisions of Section 602 (a) of the Small Business InvestmentAct of 1958. This resulted in the elimination of Section 13b surplusin the amount of $27,542,653.50; the net difference of $3,657.47was charged to Section 7 surplus. The amounts repaid had beenadvanced by the Secretary of the Treasury under the provisions ofSection 13b of the Federal Reserve Act.
Holdings of loans and securities. Average daily holdings ofloans and securities during 1958 amounted to $24,983 million, $761million more than during 1957; holdings of discounts and advancesdecreased $555 million and holdings of United States Governmentsecurities increased $1,302 million. The average rate of interestearned on discounts and advances declined from 3.15 to 2.28 percent, reflecting the net effect of three reductions in the discount ratein the first half of the year to a low of 1% per cent, and two subse-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 99
quent increases resulting in a rate of 2 ^ per cent for the last twomonths of the year. The average rate on Government securitiesdeclined from 3.15 to 2.98 per cent. The accompanying table showsholdings, earnings, and average interest rates on loans and securitiesheld by the Federal Reserve Banks during the past three years.
RESERVE BANK EARNINGS ON LOANS AND SECURITIES, 1956-58
[Dollar amounts in thousands]
Item and year
Average daily hold-ings :x
195619571958
Earnings:195619571958
Average rate of in-terest (per cent):
195619571958
Total
$24,563,39024,222,33124,983,185
595,396763,041741,781
2.423.152.97
Discountsand
advances
$833,297850,097295,250
23,02526,7926,745
2.763.152.28
Indus-trialloans
$837686415
363018
4.264.374.45
Accept-ances
$20,66225,14238,904
547848806
2.653.372.07
U.S.Government
securities
$23,708,59423,346,40624,648,616
571,788735,371734,212
2.413.152.98
1 Based on holdings at opening of business
Foreign and international accounts. Gold and dollar assets heldfor foreign account at the Federal Reserve Banks increased $2,189million in 1958, reflecting almost entirely net purchases of goldfrom the United States by foreign monetary authorities. At the endof the year holdings amounted to $12,115 million, representing$7,668 million of earmarked gold, $3,695 million of United StatesGovernment securities (largely Treasury bills), $272 million indollar deposits, $68 million of bankers' acceptances purchasedthrough Federal Reserve Banks, and $412 million of miscellaneousassets. The latter item includes mainly dollar bonds issued byforeign countries and international institutions.
The aggregate gold and dollar assets held for the InternationalBank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Finance
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
100 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Corporation, and the International Monetary Fund increased $508million in 1958.
Accounts were opened for two central banks in Africa.As in 1957, loans secured by gold collateral were of relatively
minor importance. A loan of $5 million outstanding at the beginningof 1958 was repaid in January. New arrangements amounted to atotal of $43.3 million, of which $17.9 million was outstanding atthe end of the year. Loans on gold are ordinarily made to foreignmonetary authorities to assist them in meeting their dollar require-ments for temporary needs.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York, as depositary and fiscalagent, continued to perform various services for the internationalinstitutions mentioned above. As fiscal agent of the United States,the Bank continued to operate the United States Exchange Stabiliza-tion Fund pursuant to authorization and instructions of the TreasuryDepartment. Also on behalf of the Treasury Department it con-tinued the administration of foreign assets control regulations per-taining to assets in the United States of, and transactions with,Communist China and North Korea and their nationals, and, untilrevocation on May 1, of regulations involving certain assets of theEgyptian Government and the Suez Canal Company.
Bank premises. During the year the Board authorized the con-struction of an addition to and alteration of the Federal ReserveBank building in Dallas. This program is planned to extend overseveral years.
With the approval of the Board, properties adjacent to the pres-ent locations of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and theOklahoma City Branch were acquired for future expansion; anannex building was purchased by the Federal Reserve Bank of SanFrancisco; and a site for a new building was acquired for the NewOrleans Branch. The Board also authorized the acquisition of prop-erty adjacent to the Little Rock Branch for future expansion.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 101
BOARD OF GOVERNORS—INCOME AND EXPENSES
The accounts of the Board for the year 1958 were audited bythe public accounting firm of Price Waterhouse & Co., whose cer-tificate follows:
To the Board of Governors of theFederal Reserve System
In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements present fairly theassets, liabilities and fund balances of the operating fund and the propertyand equipment fund of the Board of Governors of the Federal ReserveSystem as of December 31, 1958, and the related assessments and expendi-tures for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted account-ing principles applied on a basis consistent with that of the preceding year.Our examination of the financial statements was made in accordance withgenerally accepted auditing standards, and accordingly included such testsof the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we con-sidered necessary.
Price Waterhouse & Co.
Washington 5, D. C,February 6, 1959.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
102 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCESDECEMBER 31, 1958
ASSETS
Cash, exclusive of $173,898 representing withheld taxes $ 630,571Miscellaneous receivables and travel advances 15,790Stockroom and cafeteria inventories, at cost 18,623
Total assets of operating fund 664,984
Property and equipment, at cost:Land and improvements 792,852Building 3,878,710Furniture and equipment 561,758
Total assets of property and equipment fund 5,233,320
Total assets $5,898,304
LIABILITIES AND F U N D BALANCES
Accounts payable and accrued expense $ 336,628Fund balances:
Operating fund—Balance December 31, 1957 $ 329,503Excess of expenditures over assessments for the year . . 1,147 328,356
Property and equipment fund—Balance December 31, 1957 5,149,575Expenditures for additions 87,961Excess of cost of assets disposed of over trade-in allow-
ances (4,216) 5,233,320
Total liabilities and fund balances $5,898,304
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 103
ASSESSMENTS AND EXPENDITURES
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1958
ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ON FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS:For Board expenses and additions to property and equipment $ 5,917,200For expenditures made on behalf of the Federal Reserve Banks 4,769,500
Total assessments $10,686,700
EXPENDITURES:
For printing, issue and redemption of Federal Reserve Notes, paidon behalf of the Federal Reserve Banks $ 4,769,500
For expenses of the Board:Salaries $3,937,185Retirement and insurance contributions 512,961Traveling expenses 305,691Professional and contractual services:
Economic surveys 294,140Legal, consultant and audit fees 125,313Other 17,631
Printing and binding 175,450Telephone and telegraph 86,319Postage and expressage 66,191Equipment and other rentals 66,062Operation of cafeteria, net 51,119Heat, light and power 49,776Stationery and office and other supplies 48,927Repairs, maintenance and alterations 45,908Books and subscriptions 16,940Insurance 7,833Miscellaneous, net 22,940 5,830,386
For property and equipment 87,961
Total expenditures $10,687,847
EXCESS OF EXPENDITURES OVER ASSESSMENTS FOR THE YEAR $ 1,147
The Board's expenses for 1958 include (1) an expenditure of$107,946 incurred in connection with the continuation of the SmallBusiness Financing Study which was undertaken in 1957 for theinformation of the Federal Reserve System, the interested committeesof the Congress, and the public generally; (2) an expenditure of$15,255 for Consumer Buying Intentions surveys requested by theBureau of the Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers onNovember 21, 1957, and (3) an expenditure of $45,122 as a resultof the assignment to the Board of certain responsibilities under TheNational Plan for Civil and Defense Mobilization and DefenseMobilization Order 1-20.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
106 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
NO. 1—STATEMENT OF CONDITION OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS (IN DETAIL)DECEMBER 31, 1958
[Amounts in boldface type are those shown in the Board's weekly statement. In thousands of dollars]
ASSETSGold certificates on hand:
Held by Federal Reserve Banks 1,015,555Held by Federal Reserve Agents 1,800,000
Gold certificates due from U. S. Treasury:Interdistrict Settlement Fund 6,924,338Federal Reserve Agents' Fund 9,273,000 19,012,893
Redemption fund for Federal Reserve notes 937,919
Total gold certificate reserves 19,950,812Federal Reserve notes of other Federal Reserve Banks 476,993Other cash:
United States notes 30,678Silver certificates 243,540Standard silver dollars 7,401National bank notes and Federal Reserve Bank notes 630Subsidiary silver, nickels, and cents 54,225
Total other cash 336,474Discounts and advances secured by U. S. Govt. securities:
Discounted for member banks 45,963Discounted for others 45,963
Other discounts and advances:Discounted for member banks 100Foreign loans on gold 17,900 18,000
Total discounts and advances 63,963Industrial loans 336Acceptances:
Bought outright 43,290Held under repurchase agreement 5,799
U. S. Government securities:Bought outright—
Bills 2,250,450Certificates 18,649,726Notes 2,867,565Bonds 2,483,771
Total bought outright 26,251,512
Held under repurchase agreement 95,000
Total U. S. Government securities 26,346,512
Total loans and securities 26,459,900Due from foreign banks . 15Uncollected cash items:
Transit items 5,320,702Exchanges for clearing house 201,404Other cash items 108,578
Total uncollected cash items 5,630,684Bank premises:
Land 22,911Buildings (including vaults) 92,284Fixed machinery and equipment 39,428
Total buildings 131,712Less depreciation allowances 60,987 70,725
Total bank premises 93,636Other assets:
Miscellaneous assets acquired account industrial loans.. 25Less valuation allowances 25
NetReimbursable expenses and other items receivable.Interest accruedPremium on securitiesDeferred chargesReal estate acquired for banking house purposes.. .Suspense accountAll other
2136
112
,941,756,656,726,297625640
Total other assets 146,641
Total assets 53,095,155
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 107
NO. 1—STATEMENT OF CONDITION OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS (IN DETAIL)—ContinuedLIABILITIES
Federal Reserve notes:Outstanding (issued to Federal Reserve Banks) 29,057,573Less: Held by issuing Federal Reserve Banks 1,011,229
Forwarded for redemption 174,321 1,185,550
Federal Reserve notes, net (includes notes held by U. S. Treasury and byFederal Reserve Banks other than issuing Bank) 27,872,023
Deposits:Member bank reserves 18,503,991U. S. Treasurer—general account 358,364Foreign 272,485Other deposits:
Nonmember bank—clearing accounts 71,457Officers' and certified checks 8,839Federal Reserve exchange drafts 280Reserves of corporations doing foreign banking or
financing 16,503International organizations1 43,424Allother 250,348
Total other deposits 390,851
Total deposits 19,525,691Deferred availability cash items 4,335,126Other liabilities:
Accrued dividends unpaidUnearned discount 123Discount on securities 17,301Sundry items payable 4,012Suspense account 79All other 168
Total other liabilities 21,683
Total liabilities 51,754,523
CAPITAL ACCOUNTSCapital paid in 363,098Surplus* 868,410Other capital accounts:
Reserves for contingencies:Reserves for registered mail losses 11,124Allother 98,000
Total other capital accounts8 109,124
Total liabilities and capital accounts 53,095,155
Contingent liability on acceptances purchased for foreign correspondents 67,799Industrial loan commitments 975
1 Includes International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International MonetaryFund, and International Finance Corporation.3 Surplus (Sec. 13b) eliminated Sept. 2, 1958; see text, p. 98.8 During the year this item includes the net of earnings, expenses, profits, etc., which are closedout on December 31; see Table 6, pp. 114-115.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO. 2—STATEMENT OF CONDITION OF EACH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK AT END OF 1958 AND 1957[In thousands of dollars]
ItemTotal
1958 1957
Boston
1958 1957
New York
1958 1957
Philadelphia
1958 1957
Cleveland
1958 1957
Richmond
1958 1957
ASSETS
Gold certificate accountRedemption fund for Federal Reserve
notes
Total gold certificate reserves. . .
Federal Reserve notes of other Banks. .Other cash
i«i Discounts and advances:O Secured by U.S. Govt. securities...00 Other
Industrial loans
Acceptances:Bought outrightHeld under repurchase agreement. .
U.S. Government securities:Bought outrightHeld under repurchase agreement. .
Total loans and securities
Due from foreign banksUncollected cash itemsBank premisesOther assets
Total assets
19,012,893
937,919
21,215,392
869,249
888,156 1
55,671
,010,595
56,043
5,277,367
198,412
5,522,298
182,497
1,037,847
60,195
1,182,730
60,901
1,443,593
87,750
1,943,736 1
79,558
,033,459
85,803
1,347,887
73,569
19,950,812
476,993336,474
45,96318,000
336
43,2905,799
26,251,51295,000
22,084,641
443,288338,622
50,3645,000482
42,33723,351
23,718,935519,350
943,827
41,06119,758
2001,020327
1,066,638
31,70119,863
450290285
5,475,779
83,86560,901
6,5205,048
5,704,795
95,94966,417
3,2901,405
1,098,042
47,99116,950
5,4851,235
1,243,631
38,55615,056
5,140350173
1,531,343 2,023,294
29,10728,071
2,7751,593
28,48022,701
3,750450
1,119,262
57,45222,112
1,575913
1,421,456
45,90225,618
4,010255
1,429,342 1,293,773
43,2905,799
6,619,79195,000
42,33723,351
5,931,655519,350
1,509,042 1,384,545 2,323,915 2,083,424 1,708,764 1,515,474
26,459,900 24,359,819
155,630,684
93,636146,641
155,494,735
83,763223,584
1,430,889
405,5064,7057,884
1,294,798
467,0965,01011,971
6,775,44814
1,215,35310,31336,477
6,521,38814
1,173,56810,66455,349
1,515,762
332,9394,2458,181
1,390,208 2,328,283 2,087,624 1,711,252
1345,4254,51412,740
543,1219,43212,768
490,2719,678;19,340
433,5736,6549,479
1,519,739
421,5386,99614,058
53,095,155 53,028,467 2,853,631 2,897,078 13,658,140 13,628,134 3,024,111 3,050,131 4,482,126 4,681,389 3,359,785 3,455,308
1 After deducting $11,000 participations of other Federal Reserve Banks.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
LIABILITIES
Federal Reserve notesDeposits:
Member bank reserves ,U.S. Treasurer—general account..ForeignOther ,
Total depositsDeferred availability cash items.Other liabilities
Total liabilities
CAPITAL ACCOUNTS
Capital paid inSurplus (Sec. 7)Surplus (Sec. 13b)s
Other capital accounts..
Total liabilitiesaccounts
and capital
Ratio of gold certificate reserves todeposit and F. R. note liabilitiescombined
Contingent liability on acceptancespurchased for foreign correspondents.
Industrial loan commitments
FEDERAL RESERVE NOTESTATEMENT
Federal Reserve notes:Issued to Federal Reserve Bank
by Federal Reserve Agent andoutstanding
Less held by issuing Bank, andforwarded for redemption
Federal Reserve notes, net5
Collateral held by Federal ReserveAgent for notes issued to Bank:
Gold certificate accountEligible paperU.S. Government securities
Total collateral.
27,872,023
18,503,991358,364272,485390,851
19,525,6914,335,126
21,683
51,754,523 51,737,814
363,098868,410
109,124
53,095,155 53,028,467
42.1%
67,799975
573 2829,057,
1,185,550
11,073,000 12,25,393
18,615,000 17,
27,534,791
19,033,795480,810356,342246,284
20,117,2314,070,844
14,948
345,106809,19827,543
108,806
46.3%
76,1141,109
,643,286
1,108,495
27,872,023 27,534,791
273,00012,299
165,000
29,713,393 29,450,299
2,853,631
1,630,425
771,05721,00913,3952,202
807,663338,324
1,069
2,777,481
18,12150,116
7,913
2,821,435
17,74247,0133,0117,877
2,897,078
38.7%
3,864
1,703,455
73,030
1,630,425
650,000
1,638,156
777,42238,07719,7783,106
838,383344,347
549
43.1%
4,414
1,702,333
64,177
1,638,156
700,000
1,150,000 1,150,000
1,800,000 1,850,000
6,512,632
5,570,78735,306
2 103,755307,036
6,016,884755,659
5,376
13,290,551
105,850238,902
22,837
13,658,140
43.7%419,119
6,827,935
315,303
6,512,632
2,920,000
4,000,000
6,920,000
6,500,863 1,751,391
5,716,99368,734
2 111,163150,963
6,047,853717,766
5,367
13,271,849 2,934,572 2,960,499 4,361,306 4,566,405 3,290,802 3,387,372
102,215223,963
7,31922,788
13,628,134 3,024,111
45.5%421,398
6,795,945
295,082
6,500,863
3,270,000
3,600,000 1
863,41722,99616,2154,013
906,641275,287
1,253
21,89459,607
"8*, 038
41.3%
4,678
1,815,156
63,765
1,751,391
640,0005,285
,200,000 1
6,870,000 1,845,285
1,738,756 2,571,638
874,74130,22123,87012,954
941,786 1279,334
623
21,19255,9234,4898,028
3,050,131
46.4%
5,32726
1,800,791
62,035
1,344,0454,65620,9155,054
2,624,653
1,486,69145,77830,6905,483
374,670 1413,145
1,853
34,24676,643
9,931
4,482,126 4,681,389 3,359,785 3,455,308
38.8%
6,03435
2,645,549 2
73,911
1,738,756 2,571,638
640,0005,140
,200,000 1,750,000 1,600,000
2,135,757
764,58029,42211,9854,635
,568,642371,626
1,484
32,51471,5501,0069,914
48.3%
6,84977
,700,128 2
75,475
920,000 1,130,000
1,845,140 2,670,000 2,730,000 2,255,000 2,295,000
2,188,221
801,08347,16117,3915,156
810,622343,293
1,130
16,43944,846
7,698
38.0%
3,458
,223,
87,682
2,624,653 2,135,757
725,000
870,791327,773
587
15,69541,236
3,3497,656
46.5%
3,881
439 2,266,546
78,325
2,188,221
945,000
1,530,000 1,350,000
2 After deducting $168,730,000 participations of other Federal Reserve Banks on Dec. 31, 1958, and $245,179,000 on Dec. 31, 1957.8 Eliminated Sept. 2, 1958; see text, p. 98.4 After deducting $48,680,000 participations of other Federal Reserve Banks on Dec. 31, 1958, and $54,716,000 on Dec. 31, 1957.6 Includes Federal Reserve notes held by U.S. Treasury and by Federal Reserve Banks other than the issuing Bank.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO. 2—STATEMENT OF CONDITION OF EACH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK AT END OF 1958 AND 1957—Continued
[In thousands of dollars]
ItemAtlanta
1958 1957
Chicago
1958 1957
St. Louis
1958 1957
Minneapolis
1958 1957
Kansas City
1958 1957
Dallas
1958 1957
San Francisco
1958 1957
ASSETS
Gold certificate accountRedemption fund for Federal Reserve
notes
864,742
57,037
830,921
48,919
3,326,227 3,805,144
167,634 157,090
753,490
44,661
908,740
43,349
458,383
22,463
390,876
22,171
748,339
43,533
843,470
41,597
721,519
29,845
808,001
28,495
2,459,771
84,915
2,620,994
75,060
Total gold certificate reserves.Federal Reserve notes of other Banks.Other cash
Discounts and advances:Secured by U.S. Govt. securities.Other
Industrial loans
921,77953,14326,560
4,765805
879,840 3,493,86156,40424,744
3,050225
40,26758,734
3,8852,560
3,962,23437,73156,959
8,750710
798,15123,28726,513
1,600662
952,08917,58825,649
250185
480,84617,5888,664
413,04723,0088,359
4309
12024
791,87211,31714,662
18,408798
885,06710,16212,492
6,909190
751,36428,33314,687
750931
836,496 2,544,686 2,696,05421,14812,829
14,565260
43,58238,862
2,005
36,65947,935
200560
Acceptances:Bought outrightHeld under repurchase agree-
ment
U.S. Government securities:Bought outrightHeld under repurchase agree-
ment
1,335,756 1,228,570 4,585,614 4,140,164 1,070,904 980,896 552,253 511,855 1,120,493 1,018,325 1,028,298 929,521 2,967,340 2,700,733
Total loans and securi t ies . . . .
Due from foreign banks.Uncollected cash items..Bank premisesOther assets
1,341,326
453,2149,2948,470
1,231,845 4,592,059 4,149,624
1466,2376,49711,657
2902,99911,82424,838
2887,5376,823
40,656
1,073,166
1232,3996,8625,917
981,331
1188,6516,1389,041
552,692
()145,3205,1933,076
511,999
(6)
136,1915,3074,779
1,139,699 1,025,424 1,029,979 944,346 2,969,345 2,701,493
1254,995
4,7997,130
1238,904
4,9039,493
1242,747
7,7865,917
223,3686,2609,345
468,51812,52916,504
455,94910,97325,155
Total assets. 2,813,787 2,677,225 9,124,584 9,141,566 2,166,296 2,180,488 1,213,379 1,102,690 2,224,475 2,186,446 2,080,814 2,053,793 6,094,027 5,974,219
6 Less than $500.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
LIABILITIES
Federal Reserve notesDeposits:
Member bank reservesU.S. Treasurer—general accountForeignOther
Total depositsDeferred availability cash itemsOther liabilities
Total liabilities
CAPITAL ACCOUNTS
2,749,475 2,617,260 8,928,302
Capital paid inSurplus (Sec. 7)Surplus (Sec. 13b)8
Other capital accounts..
Total liabilities and capitalaccounts 2,813,787
Ratio of gold certificate reserves todeposit and F. R. note liabilitiescombined
Contingent liability on acceptancespurchased for foreign correspond-ents
Industrial loan commitments
FEDERAL RESERVE NOTESTATEMENT
Federal Reserve notes:Issued to Federal Reserve Bank
by Federal Reserve Agent andoutstanding
Less held by issuing Bank, andforwarded for redemption
Federal Reserve notes, net5...
Collateral held by Federal ReserveAgent for notes issued to Bank:
Gold certificate accountEligible paper.U.S. Government securities
Total collateral.
1,476,020 1,305,420 5,302,681
846,39832,47910,5752,347
891,799380,576
1,080
18,37139,474
6,467
2,677,225 9,124,584 9,141,566 2,166,296 2,180,488
38.9%
3,051
475,000
851,88141,23115,3453,974
2,809,518 2,905,986
912,431398,917
492
2,900,146 3,026,852721,508
3,967
16,56236,192
7626,449
39.7%
3,425
1,476,020 1,305,420 5,302,681
5,334,243
48,61933,6058,404
8,957,650 2,114,024 2,130,645
49,665132,159
' '14,458
42.6%
9,695
1,556,710 1,374,708 5,474,313 5,472,919
80,690 69,288 171,632 138,676
425,000 2,200,000 2,500,000
1,100,000 1,000,000 3,400,000 3,100,000
1,238,269 1,226,564
62,02148,42210,423
594,0802,475
46,570121,504
1,42914,413
47.4%
10,80666
5,334,243
1,575,000 1,425,000 5,600,000 5,600,000 1,366,600 1,345,250
669,05719,2838,6953,141
700,176174,787
792
12,34833,746
' *6,i78
41.2%
2,509
1,296,838
58,569
1,238,269
430,0001,600
935,000
699,44025,98212,6172,560
740,599163,043
439
11,57731,586
5216,159
48.4%
2,816
1,280,689
54,125
1,226,564
450,000250
895,000
598,279
419,89524,4595,640961
450,955129,777
933
1,179,944 1,070,243 2,170,964 2,135,289
8,38720,785
" 4,263
1,213,379
45.8%
1,627
614,338
16,059
598,279
200,000
425,000
625,000
494,826 1,101,081
433,49118,5158,1841,336
461,526113,263
628
7,42619,6971,0734,251
1,102,690 2,224,475 2,186,446 2,080,814 2,053,793 6,094,027 5,974,219
43.2%
1,826
130,000
425,000
817,73038,2719,1653,279
868,445200,590
14,84832,935
5,728
40.2%
2,644940
534,419 1,137,662
39,593 36,581
494,826 1,101,081
300,00018,508
850,000
555,000 1,168,508 1,126,909
1,077,385
804,11141,69012,9583,436
862,195195,229
480
1,015,397196,451
710
13,78130,5331,1375,706
2,011,171
20,68443,436
45.6%
2,892940
1,109,605
32,220
1,077,385
300,0006,909
820,000
798,613
969,76930,63012,2202,778
5,523
1,986,704
19,40540,8711,3075,506
41.4%
3,526
849,075
50,462
798,613
313,000
575,000
888,000
748,184 2,755,237
996,22330,86817,7322,167
1,046,990 2,782,293 2,799,183190,958 405,729 374,508
572 2,672 1,252
46.6%
3,957
44,684
525,000
2,657,520
2,657,738 2,685,73330,53238,19244,726
51,23426,32047,001
5,945,931
42,24595,761
10,090
5,832,463
40,42789,1302,14010,059
46.0%
7,594
792,868 2,913,103 2,812,335
157,866
748,184 2,755,237 2,657,520
283,000 1,300,000 1,500,000
808,000 3,000,000 3,000,000
49.4%
8,523
154,815
1,700,000 1,500,000
8 Eliminated Sept. 2, 1958; see text, p. 98.6 Includes Federal Reserve notes held by U.S. Treasury and by Federal Reserve Banks other than the issuing Bank.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO. 3—HOLDINGS OF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SECURITIES BY FEDERALRESERVE BANKS, END OF DECEMBER 1956, 1957, AND 1958
[In thousands of dollars]
Type of issue
Treasury bonds:1956-581958 June1958 Dec1957 591956-591960 Nov1961 Sept1961 Nov1959-62 June1959-62 Dec1963 Aug1964 Feb1965 Feb1960-651
1966 Aug1962 671963-681964-69 June1964-69 Dec1965-701966-711967-72 June1967-72 Sept1967-72 Dec1969 Oct1974 Nov1978-831985 May1990 Feb1995 Feb
Total Treasury bonds.
Treasury notes:Mar. 15, 1957-AApr. 1, 1957-EA....May 15, 1957-BAug. 1, 1957-DAug. 15, 1957-COct. 1, 1957-EO....Apr. 1, 1958-EA....June 1, 1958-AOct. 1, 1958-EO....Feb. 15, 1959-AApr. 1, 1959-EA....Oct. 1, 1959-EO....Nov. 15, 1959-BApr. 1, 1960-EAMay 15, 1960-AOct. 1, 1960-EO....Apr. 1, 1961-EAMay 15, 1961-BAug. 1, 1961-AOct. 1, 1961-EO....Feb. 15, 1962-AApr. 1, 1962-EA....Aug. 15, 1962-BOct. 1, 1962-EO....Nov. 15, 1962-CFeb. 15, 1963-AApr. 1, 1963-EA...Oct. 1, 1963-EO...
Total Treasury notes.
Certificates:Feb. 15, 1957Oct. 1, 1957Feb. 14, 1958Aug. 1,1958Dec. 1, 1958Feb. 14, 1959Aug. 1,1959Nov. 15, 1959
Total certificates.. ..
Treasury bills
Repurchase agreements
Total holdings
Rate ofinterest
(per cent)
2V22%2V22%2M2Vs2%2H2M
3 2
2V82%
2XA2XA2Y22XA2~A2Y22%2XA2Y243%3M3K3V23
2%
2M
13^
1Hi y&\y2\y2
3y2
33J3%4
3%
ip2V8
2%
4 8
3%iy215A3Vs
December 31
1958
319,849693,765
20,300
7,00056,610
122,585203,890266,999521,490132,70749,2662,552
58,758
5,20022,800
2,483,771
2,857,565
10,000
2,867,565
*5,506*, 9938,142,7335,000,000
18,649,726
2,250,450
95,000
26,346,512
1957
12,493
339,09621,690
319,849693,765
56,610122,585203,890266,999521,490132,70749,2662,552
58,758
2,801,750
5,494,5006,581,5477,857,565
19,933,612
983,573
519,350
24,238,285
1956
12,493
339,09621,690
319,849693,765
56,610122,585203,890266,999521,490132,70749,2662,552
58,758
2,801,750
500,000
7,940,065
713,848
9,153,913
5,012,0005,920,699
10,932,69
1,721,27
305,10
24,914,73
Change during
1958
-12,493
-339,096-21,690
+20,300
+7,000
+5,200+22,800
-317,979
+2,857,565
+10,000
+2,867,565
-5,494,500-6,581,547-7,857,565+5,506,993+8,142,733+5,000,000
-1,283,88
+1,266,87
-424,35
+2,108,22
1957
-500,000
-7,940,065
-713,848
-9,153,913
-5,012,000-5,920,699+5,494,500+6,581,547+7,857,565
+9,000,913
-737,697
+214,250
-676,447
* Partly tax-exempt.
112Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO. 4—FEDERAL RESERVE BANK HOLDINGS OF SPECIAL SHORT-TERM TREASURYCERTIFICATES PURCHASED DIRECTLY FROM THE UNITED STATES, 1953-581
Date
1953-Mar. 18192021*2223242526
June 56*78
Amount
1101041891891893331866349196196196374
[Ir
Date
1953—June 910111213*14151617181920*21
I millions
Amount
491451358506506506999
1,172823364992992992
of dollars]
Date
1953—June 222324
1954—Jan. 141516*17181920212223
Amount
90860829622169169169323424323306283283
Date
1954—Jan. *242526
Mar. 1516
1955)
Amount
2832033
134190
1956 >• no transactions1957 )
1958—Mar. 1718
143207
* Sunday or holiday.1 Under authority of Section 14(b) of the Federal Reserve Act. On November 9, 1953, the Re-
serve Banks sold directly to the U. S. Treasury $500 million of Treasury notes; this is the only use thathas been made under the same authority to sell U. S. Government securities directly to the UnitedStates.
NOTE.—Interest rate M per cent through Dec. 3, 1957, and M per cent below prevailing discountrate of Federal Reserve Bank of New York thereafter. Actual rate for 1958 purchases, 2 per cent.For data for prior years beginning with 1942, see previous Annual Reports. No holdings on dates notshown.
NO. 5—VOLUME OF OPERATIONS IN PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENTS OF FEDERALRESERVE BANKS, 1954-58
[Number in thousands; amounts in thousands of dollars]
1958 1957 1956 1955 1954
NUMBER OF PIECESHANDLED1
Discounts and advances:2
Notes discounted andadvances made
Currency received andcounted
Coin received and counted...Checks handled:
U. S. Govt. checksPostal money ordersAll other3
Collection items handled:U. S. Govt. coupons paid. . .All other
Issues, redemptions, andexchanges of U. S. Govt.securities
Transfers of funds
AMOUNTS HANDLED
Discounts and advances2. . . .Currency received and
countedCoin received and counted...Checks handled:
U. S. Govt. checksPostal money ordersAllother3
Collection items handled:U. S. Govt. coupons paid..Allother
Issues, redemptions, andexchanges of U. S. Govt.securities
Transfers of funds
14
4,547,6689,574,474
388,541295,350
3,085,185
13,56420,429
193,6652,426
41,306,072
29,596,570956,235
99,942,3725,297,341
1,044,984,066 1
3,695,4585,663,684
25
4,631,6769,089,460
469,158324,161
2,974,940
12,54619,308
207,2462,302
114,469,820
29,926,319922,742
102,062,9725,796,279
,044,553,457
3,032,8055,758,976
526,037,2711,643,532,069
493,391,2671,345,185,037
23
4,466,7398,610,821
539,359342,313
2,822,589
11,99717,813
198,5192,123
109,665,475
29,104,496887,418
114,173,1325,941,097
1,003,202,371
2,563,0755,495,317
421,612,394
21
4,282,5628,430,796
503,516347,351
2,643,549
12,30116,368
191,9221,960
88,436,422
27,461,048862,022
123,215,6815,814,754
927,648,399
2,595,3055,354,604
429,701,9601,233,509,550 1,091,608,891
10
4,384,2708,382,024
481,408354,368
2,512,985
12,75315,443
191,1121,808
22,871,449
28,482,428810,278
141,037,4955,943,178
845,365,275
2,209,0455,085,695
469,247,4001,038,100,606
1 Two or more checks, coupons, etc., handled as a single item are counted as one "piece."2 Exclusive of industrial loans.8 Exclusive of checks drawn on the Federal Reserve Banks.
113Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO. 6—EARNINGS AND EXPENSES OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS DURING 1958
Item Total Boston New YorkPhila-
delphiaCleve-land
Rich-mond Atlanta Chicago St. Louis
Minne-apolis
KansasCity Dallas
SanFrancisco
CURRENT EARNINGS
Discounts and advances....Industrial loans and com-
mitmentsAcceptancesU.S. Government securities.All other
Total current earnings. .
$6,744,47421,843
805,781734,211,830
284,220
742,068,150
$340,549
14,696
39,932,73915,700
40,303,684
$1,592,055
805,781185,595,281
66,135
$321,990
3,002
16,303
$840,189
630
21,390
$365,807
42,316,962 64,755,386 47,475,124 37,483,11714,559
$667,053
23,327
$1,219,562
79
41,191
188,059,252 42,658,257 65,617,595 47,855,490 38,173,496 129,284,039 30,269,193 15,700,159 31,974,392 28,902,546 83,270,047
$243,498
128,023,207 30,016,564 15,530,096 31,338,9059,131
$159,214
813
10,036
$607,852
2,621
25,014
$168,847
15,807
$217,859
28,717,892 83,026,55825,630
CURRENT EXPENSES
Salaries:Officers ,Employees
Directors' and other fees .. ,Retirement contributions..Traveling expensesPostage and expressageTelephone and telegraph..Printing, stationery, and
suppliesInsuranceTaxes on real estateDepreciation (building)Light, heat, power, and
waterRepairs and alterations ,Rent ,Furniture and equipment:
Purchases ,Rentals
All otherInterbank expenses
SubtotalFederal Reserve currency.. .Assessment for expenses of
Board of Governors
Total.Less reimbursement for cer-tain fiscal agency andother expenses
Net expenses.
6,269,24280,500,913
489,6669,627,9161,682,27916,401,1041,291,235
6,264,4841,295,5123,778,9054,032,079
1,531,2751,281,246218,223
3,171,9425,578,0231,915,955
145,330,0005,973,240
5,917,200
157,220,440
19,498,784
137,721,655
354,2034,952,887
24,148581,072105,415
1,347,59369,514
479,92386,092599,850414,858
111,95036,1215,663
90,716458,91199,19538,486
9,856,597374,512
338,400
10,569,509
1,044,022
9,525,487
1,135,97417,965,149
62,5372,025,616280,614
2,375,805270,122
1,190,373224,187739,798419,598
257,727184,3706,062
710,565755,162358,882
-452,014
28,510,5271,237,367
1,667,300
31,415,194
3,276,185
28,139,009
379,2824,364,639
24,545524,92873,401
853,70260,385
316,44453,043141,126268,149
99,36068,9357,186
71,372360,50891,77646,112
7,804,893209,817
408,000
8,422,710
994,319
7,428,391
543,2677,196,012
51,540864,509146,435
1,346,178109,238
489,153123,603338,953561,243
170,087430,29117,603
252,288445,216367,90460,898
13,514,418454,982
526,100
1,879,716
12,615,784
494,3125,256,306
24,926649,205137,221
1,597,08398,228
423,161100,133173,644480,855
146,17841,3732,506
135,984399,243100,702-9,352
10,251,708580,121
301,300
14,495,500 11,133,129 10,731,435
1,083,025
10,050,104
510,5575,081,209
72,949633,757134,922
1,425,438131,088
463,68878,903
170,448163,835
80,44934,13714,707
541,278394,271127,44633,844
10,092,926369,309
269,200
1,456,523
9,274,911
659,69812,466,159
30,0221,493,184212,915
2,205,310147,066
1,003,803179,040470,956355,415
173,83836,70795,497
202,657891,557238,77397,191
20,959,7881,412,956
851,000
23,223,744
3,266,108
19,957,636
440,2384,613,400
33,163554,998108,412883,89474,673
422,89895,264130,163170,854
109,33163,4612,285
392,354307,43185,29726,581
8,514,697303,608
218,800
9,037,105
1,218,556
7,818,549
330,2092,491,036
32,465296,93787,636
584,00746,452
177,62957,861
281,752175,378
78,162200,523
202
208,842191,66991,51316,626
5,348,89992,861
142,400
5,584,160
604,932
4,979,227
472,1594,140,157
49,647532,199103,345972,05273,336
365,58392,540162,514142,854
110,88388,787
177
215,608316,595122,23228,320
7,988,988170,769
228,100
8,387,857
1,395,922
6,991,936
422,2353,754,226
37,367486,395113,151852,47785,715
310,98175,547154,479237,786
80,71411,36154,394
116,050310,481109,51336,429
7,249,301207,187
308,700
1,137,382
527,1088,219,733
46,357985,116178,812
1,957,565125,418
620,848129,299415,222641,254
112,59685,18011,941
234,228746,979122,72276,880
15,237,258559,751
657,900
7,765,18816,454,909
2,142,094
6,627,80614,312,815
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
PROFIT AND LOSS
Current net earnings
Additions to current netearnings:
Profits on sales of U.S.Government securi-ties (net)
All other
Total additionsDeductions from current
net earnings:Reserves for contin-
genciesAll other
Transferred to surplus (Sec.
Surplus (Sec. 7) Jan. 1.'.' .''. '.Transferred from surplus
(Sec. 13b)
Surplus (Sec. 7) Dec. 31
604,346,495
156,596297,047
Total deductions
Net additions
Net earnings before pay-ments to U.S. Treasury. .
Paid U.S. Treasury (intereston F. R. notes)
Dividends paid
453,643
316,52612,941
329,467
124,176
604,470,670
524,058,65021,197,452
59,214,569809,197,680
-3,657
868,408,591
30,778,197
9,137291
159,920,243 35,229,866 53,001,811
9,428
35,3121,280
36,591
-27,164
30,751,033
26,710,2241,073,009
2,967,80047,012,677
135,411
38,53812,063
50,601
49,260523
49,783
819
6,199,722
15,372,107223,963,199 55,922
-433,413
9,524218
9,742
9,5511,449
11,000
-1,258
159,921,062 35,228,608 53,016,364 37,772,183
138,349,233 30,540,793 45,9181,294,403
3,393,412,772
290,661
50,115,888 238,901,893 59,606,846 76,642,500 44,845,980 39,474,103
37,805,386 28,898,585
13,84818,656
32,503
17,393558
17,951
14,553
5,5511,995,760
5,102,05371,550,353
-9,906
9,7951,719
11,513
42,6362,080
44,716
-33,203
33,129,772961,325
3,681,08641,236,411
-71,517
8,44827,739
36,187
18,5062,328
20,834
15,353
28,913,937
24,584,4721,052,929
3,276,53636,192,075
5,491
109,326,403 22,450,644
26,38026,960
53,340
44,771622
45,392
7,948
109,334,351
95,789,0482,902,076
132,158,534 33,746,035
6,933139,600
146,533
18,436671
19,107
127,425
19,675,908715,956
10,643,227 2,186,206 1,023,576 2,410,665121,503,625 31,586,344 19,696,549 30,532,901
11,682 -26,515 64,874 -8,674
10,720,932 24,982,456 22,274,740 68,957,232
3,949401
4,350
11,8161,230
13,046
-8,696
476,455
6,664810
7,474
21,47935
21,514
— 14,040
22,578,070 10,712,236 24,968,416 22,326,80068,947,610
9,212,206 21,696,020861,731
6,49063,295
69,785
16,870855
17,725
52,060
1,196,810
2,509,87940,871,083 89
55,337
20,785,000 32,934,892 43,436,29995,760,623
16,8905,297
22,186
30,4971,311
31,808
-9,621
18,620,110 59,832,3142,467,275
6,648,022,129,690
-17,089
NOTE.—Details may not add to totals because of rounding.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO. 7—EARNINGS AND EXPENSES OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS, 1914-58
Bank and period
All Federal ReserveBanks, by years:
1914-151916191719181919
19201921192219231924
19251926192719281929
19301931193219331934
19351936193719381939
19401941194219431944
19451946194719481949
Currentearnings
$ 2,173,2525,217,998
16,128,33967,584,417
102,380,583181,296,711122,865,86650,498,69950,708,56638,340,44941,800,70647,599,59543,024,48464,052,86070,955,49636,424,04429,701,27950,018,81749,487,31848,902,81342,751,95937,900,63941,233,13536,261,42838,500,66543,537,80541,380,09552,662,70469,305,715
104,391,829
142,209,546150,385,033158,655,566304,160,818316,536,930
Currentexpenses
$ 2,320,5862,273,9995,159,727
10,959,53319,339,633
28,258,03034,463,84529,559,04929,764,17328,431,12627,528,16327,350,18227,518,44326,904,81029,691,113
28,342,72627,040,66426,291,38129,222,83729,241,39631,577,44329,874,02328,800,61428,911,60828,646,85529,165,47732,963,15038,624,04443,545,56449,175,921
48,717,27157,235,10765,392,97572,710,18877,477,676
Net earningsbefore pay-
ments toU. S. Treasury1
$ -141,4592,750,9989,582,067
52,716,31078,367,504
149,294,77482,087,22516,497,73612,711,2863,718,180
9,449,06616,611,74513,048,24932,122,02136,402,741
7,988,1822,972,066
22,314,2447,957,407
15,231,409
9,437,7588,512 433
10,801,2479,581,954
12,243,365
25,860,0259,137,581
12,470,45149,528,43358,437,788
92,662,26892,523,93595,235,592
197,132,683226,936,980
Dividendspaid
$ 217,4631,742,7746,804,1865,540,6845,011,832
5,654,0186,119,6736,307,0356,552,7176,682,496
6,915,9587,329,1697,754,5398,458,4639,583,913
10,268 59810,029,7609,282,2448,874,2628,781 661
8,504,9747 829 5817,940,9668,019,1378,110,462
8,214,9718,429,9368,669 0768,911,3429,500,126
10,182,85110,962,16011,523,04711,919,80912,329,373
Franchise taxpaid to U. S.
Treasury
$ 1,134,234
2,703,894
60,724,74259,974,46610,850,6053,613,056
113,646
59,300818,150249,591
2,584,6594,283,231
17,308
2,011,418
Paid to U. S.Treasury(Sec. 13b)
$ 297,667227 448176,625119,52424,579
82,152141,465197 672244,726326 717
247 65967,05435,605
Paid to U. S.Treasury
(interest onF. R. notes)
$ 75,223,818166 690 356193,145,837
Transferredto surplus(Sec. 13b)
$ _60 323
27,695102 88067,304
—419,140-425,653
-54,456—4 33349 602
135,003201 150
262 13327 70886,772
Transferredto surplus
(Sec. 7)
$ 1,134,23448 334 34170 651 778
82 916 01415 993 086
—659 9042 545 513
—3 077 962
2 473 8088 464 4265 044 119
21 078 89922,535 597
—2 297 724—7 057 69411 020 582
—916 8556 510 071
607,422352 524
2,616,3521 862 4334,533,977
17,617,358570 513
3 554 10140 237 36248 409 795
81 969 62581 467 0138,366,350
18 522 51821,461,770
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
19501951195219531954
1955195619571958
Total 1914-58...
Aggregate for eachFederal Reserve Bank,1914-58:
BostonNew YorkPhiladelphiaClevelandRichmondAtlantaChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolisKansas CityDallas. .San Francisco
Total
275,838,994394,656,072456,060,260513,037,237438,486,040
412,487,931595,649,092763,347,530742,068,150
7,290,667,465
451,967,1491,864,727,623
481,030,355658,534,350437,868,817375,948,311
1,140,290,111334,241,001201,789,760332,667,298294,935,811716,666,880
7,290,667,465
80,571,77195,469,086
104,694,091113,515,020109,732,931
110,060,023121,182,496131,814,003137,721,655
2,137,240,408
152,423,577478,460,584143,402,176197,099,010140,092,135118,543,553299,672,903117,440,86272,211,504
115,323,10297,073,850
205,497,152
2,137,240,408
231,561,340297,059,097352,950,157398,463,224328,619,468
302,162,452474,443,160624,392,613604,470,670
5,096,306,434
296,775,4031,381,677,841
336,825,931454,540,038293,740,235251,612,569829,293,388211,215,314127,580,626213,462,848194,268,704505,313,536
5,096,306,434
13,082,99213,864,75014,681,78815,558,37716,442,236
17,711,93718,904,89720,080,52721,197,452
430,484,212
27,237,886141,938,10734,963,74542,423,56718,550,48416,810,53752,729,47714,862,77910,088,10515,279,56716,991,02238,608,934
430,484,212
149,138,300
7,111,39568,006,2625,558,9014,842,4476,200,1898,950,561
25,313,5262,755,6295,202,9006,939,100
560,0497,697,341
149,138,300
2,188,893
280,843369,116722,40682,930
172,49379,264
151,0457,464
55,61564,213
102,083101,421
2,188,893
196,628,858254,873,588291,934,634342,567,985276,289,457
251,740,721401,555,581542,708,405524,058,650
3,517,417,892
201,799,152895,639,303221,353,150317,324,708218,162,797181,026,072603,600,369154,750,29387,506,923
154,113,800128,846,435353,294,890
3,517,417,892
B - 3 , 6 5 7
B + 1 3 5 , 4 1 1-433,413+290,661
B—9,906B - 7 1 , 5 1 7
+5,491B + 1 1 , 6 8 2B - 2 6 , 5 1 5B+64,874
-8,674B+55,337B - 1 7 , 0 8 9
B - 3 , 6 5 7
21,849,49028,320,75946,333,73540,336,86235,887,775
32,709,79453,982,68261,603,68259,214,569
2997,O8O,793
60,210,713276,158,46473,937,06889,876,29350,725,78844,740,643
147,487,28838,865,66324,662,21337,074,84247,713,777
105,628,040
997,080,793
B Revised.1 Current earnings less current expenses, plus and minus profit and loss additions and deductions.2 The $997,080,793 transferred to surplus was reduced by direct charges of $139,299,557 for contributions to capital of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, $500,000
for charge-off on bank premises and $3,657 net upon elimination of surplus (Sec. 13b), and was increased by $11,131,013 transferred from reserves for contingencies, leaving abalance of $868,408,591 on Dec. 31, 1958.
NOTE.—Details may not add to totals because of rounding.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO. 8—MEMBER BANK RESERVES, RESERVE BANK CREDIT, AND RELATED ITEMS—END OF YEAR 1918-58 AND END OF MONTH 1958
[In millions of dollars]
End ofyear ormonth
1918.. .1919 . . .
1920.. .1921. . .
I-* 1922. . .»-* 1923 . . .00 1924 . . .
1925 . . .1926. . .1927. . .1928. . .1929 . . .
1930.. .1931. . .1932 . . .1933. . .1934 . . .
1935 . . .1936 . . .1937.. .1938.. .1939 . . .
1940.. .1 9 4 1 . . .1942 . . .1943 . . .1944.. .
Reserve Bank credit outstanding
U.S. Governmentsecurities
Total
239300
287234436134540
375315617228511
729817
1,8552,4372,430
2,4312,4302,5642,5642,484
2,1842,2546,189
11,54318,846
Boughtout-right
239300
287234436
80536
367312560197488
686775
1,8512,4352,430
2,4302,4302,5642,5642,484
2,1842,2546,189
11,54318,846
Heldunder
repur-chaseagree-ment
' " 5 4 '4
83
573123
4342
42
1
Dis-counts
andad-
vances
1,7662,215
2,6871,144
618723320
643637582
1,056632
25163823598
7
53
1047
3365
80
Float
199201
11940782752
6345632434
212014155
1239191791
8094
471681815
Allother*
294575
262146273355390
378384393500405
37237841
13721
3828191611
81014104
Total
2,4983,292
3,3551,5631,4051,2381,302
1,4591,3811,6551,8091,583
1,3731,8532,1452,6882,463
2,4862,5002,6122,6012,593
2,2742,3616,679
12,23919,745
Goldstock2
2,8732,707
2,6393,3733,6423,9574,212
4,1124,2054,0923,8543,997
4,3064,1734,2264,0368,238
10,12511,25812,76014,51217,644
21,99522,73722,72621,93820,619
Treas-urycur-
rencyout-
stand-ing8
1,7951,707
1,7091,8421,9582,0092,025
1,9771,9912,0062,0122,022
2,0272,0352,2042,3032,511
2,4762,5322,6372,7982,963
3,0873,2473,6484,0944,131
Cur-rency
incircu-lation
4,9515,091
5,3254,4034,5304,7574,760
4,8174,8084,7164,6864,578
4,6035,3605,3885,5195,536
5,8826,5436,5506,8567,598
8,73211,16015,41020,44925,307
Treas-urycashhold-ings4
288385
218214225213211
203201208202216
211222272284
3,029
2,5662,3763,6192,7062,409
2,2132,2152,1932,3032,375
Deposits, other thanmember bank reserves,
with F. R. Banks
Treas-ury
deposits
5131
5796113851
1617182329
1954
83
121
544244142923634
368867799579440
For-eign
deposits
9673
51234
19
846
566
679194
20
2999
172199397
1,133774793
1,3601,204
Otherdeposits
2528
1815261920
2119212124
223124
128169
226160235242256
599586485356394
OtherFed-eralRe-
serveac-
counts5
118208
298285276275258
272293301348393
375354355360241
253261263260251
284291256339402
Member bankreserves
Total
1
I11
V12i:i:U
L.636L,890
1,781L,753L,934L,8982,220
2,2122,1942,4872,3892,355
2,471L.9612,5092,7291,096
5,5873,6061,0275,724L,653
t,026>,4505,117',886t,373
Re-quired6
1,5851,822
1,654
1,8842,161
2,2562,2502,4242,4302,428
2,3751,9941,9331,8702,282
2,7434,6225,8155,5196,444
7,4119,365
11,12911,65012,748
Ex-cess8
5168
99
1459
- 4 4- 5 6
63- 4 1- 7 3
96- 3 3576859
1,814
2,8441,9841,2123,2055,209
6,6153,0851,9881,2361,625
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1945.. .1946...1947.. .1948. . .1949. ..
1950...1951. . .1952. . .1953. . .1954.. .
1955. . .1956. . .1957. . .
1958—Jan..Feb. ,Mar.,Apr.May,JuneJuly.Aug.,Sep..Oct..Nov.,Dec.,
24,26223,35022,55923,33318,885
20,77823,80124,69725,91624,932
24,78524,91524,238
23,33123,24023,62823,68124,16225,43824,48025,34624,98625,44326,22926,347
24,26223,35022,55923,33318,885
20,72523,60524,03425,31824,888
24,39124,61023,719
23,33123,24023,62823,68124,16225,43824,48025,34624,98625,37326,06926,252
5319666359844
394305519
7016095
2491638522378
671915628143
1085055
217122137156144419455525540771764
578580535541534
1,3681,184967935808
1,5851,6651,424
763924765797965758868805860788
1,0261,296
21112
35421
297066
25,09124,09323,18124,09719,499
22,21625,00925,82526,88025,885
26,50726,69925,784
24,35224,33024,57024,67225,31326,28325,47726,73926,13026,67528,00627,755
20,06520,52922,75424,24424,427
22,70622,69523,18722,03021,713
21,69021,94922,781
22,78422,68622,39421,99621,59421,35621,21021,01120,87420,69020,60920,534
4,3394,5624,5624,5894,598
4,6364,7094,8124,8944,985
5,0085,0665,146
,158,169,183,196,201,203,207
5,2115,2195,2225,2285,234
28,51528,95228,86828,22427,600
27,74129,20630,43330,78130,509
31,15831,79031,834
30,57630,55430,66630,56530,99431,17231,17131,37131,24531,38632,03632,193
2,2872,2721,3361,3251,312
1,2931,2701,270761796
767775761
771695722734703692685684684674694683
977393870
1,123821
668247389346563
394441481
469516474594382410617540371363424358
862508392642767
895526550423490
402322356
249265266257234269288313258288226272
446314569547750
565363455493441
554426246
279336378411624420329332395335430391
495607563590706
714746777839907
925901998
990,151,108,050994,096,039,184,122,079,038,122
15,91516,13917,89920,47916,568
17,68120,05619,95020,16018,876
19,00519,05919,034
18,95818,66718,53218,25418,17618,78417,76418,53818,14718,46218,99418,504
14,45715,57716,40019,27715,550
16,50919,66720,52019,39718,618
18,90319,08919,091
18,54318,18617,85717,68617,54318,15817,80117,86017,78518,00918,21718,574
1,458562
1,4991,2021,018
1,172389
-570763258
102-30-57
415481675568633626-37678362453777-70
1 Comprises acceptances and industrial loans.2 Prior to Jan. 30, 1934, included gold held by Federal Reserve Banks and in circulation.8 The stock of currency, other than gold, for which the Treasury is primarily responsible—silver bullion at monetary value and standard silver dollars, subsidiary silverand minor coin, and United States notes; also, Federal Reserve Bank notes and national bank notes for the retirement of which lawful money has been deposited with the Treas-urer of the United States. Includes currency of these kinds held in the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Banks as well as that in circulation.4 Gold other than that held against gold certificates and gold certificate credits, including the reserve against United States notes and Treasury notes of 1890, monetarysilver other than that held against silver certificates and Treasury notes of 1890, and the following coin and paper currency held in the Treasury: subsidiary silver and minorcoin, United States notes, Federal Reserve notes, Federal Reserve Bank notes, and national bank notes.5 The total of Federal Reserve Bank capital paid in, surplus, other capital accounts, and other liabilities and accrued dividends, less the sum of bank premises and otherassets.8 These figures are estimated. Available only on call dates prior to 1929 (in 1920 and 1922, the call dates were December 29).
NOTE.—For description of figures and discussion of their significance, see Banking and Monetary Statistics, Sec. 10, pp. 360-66.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO. 9—BANK PREMISES OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHESDECEMBER 31, 1958
Federal Reserve Bank orbranch
Cost
LandBuilding
(includingvault)1
Fixed ma-chinery andequipment
Total
Netbook value
Boston ,
New YorkAnnex ,
Buffalo ,
Philadelphia
ClevelandCincinnatiPittsburgh
Richmond ,BaltimoreCharlotte
AtlantaAnnex
BirminghamJacksonville.. .NashvilleNew Orleans. .
ChicagoDetroit
St. LouisLittle RockLouisvilleMemphis
Minneapolis.. .Helena
Kansas City. . .DenverOklahoma CityOmaha
DallasEl PasoHoustonSan Antonio...
San Francisco.Annex
Los Angeles. . .PortlandSalt Lake City.Seattle
Total.. .
$1,628,132
5,215,656592,679401,864
1,884,357
1,295,490400,891
1,189,941
469,944250,487117,479
633,38793,931
328,997164,004422,577277,078
6,019,7571,147,734
1,675,78085,007
523,353128,542
600,52115,709
545,764592,271
65,021445,663
686,243262,477629,768448,596
476,768247,201736,867207,380555,723274,772
$5,929,169
12,183,5281,661,6802,519,310
4,839,506
6,566,3601,573,0054,954,701
4,269,4412,009,3811,065,485
1,722,115137,100
2,715,0541,686,2502,384,089
762,456
$2,977,084
4,886,521562,181
1,559,393
2,130,561
2,990,665999,107689,889
2,094,9521,062,747
607,294
362,731103,86770,511
694,291
9,983,7972,837,712
3,225,466264,604
2,859,819287,469
4,579,206126,401
3,521,181523,041421,252
1,491,117
2,019,797787,728
2,218,5571,400,390
3,783,530124,000
4,074,3801,678,5122,428,8601,891,564
265,700
2,743,1551,214,162
1,994,738194,115
1,003,708152,627
2,404,51462,977
1,316,31986,91097,588
718,041
466,692393,301
570,847
1,458,02830,000
1,491,100630,92084,814
642,240
$10,534,385
22,285,7052,816,5404,480,567
8,854,424
10,852,5152,973,0036,834,531
6,834,3373,322,6151,790,258
2,718,233334,898
3,114,5622,544,5452,806,6661,305,234
18,746,7095,199,608
6,895,984543,726
4,386,880568,638
7,584,241205,087
5,383,2641,202,222
583,8612,654,821
3,172,7321,443,5062,848,3252,419,833
5,718,326401,201
6,302,3472,516,8123,069,3972,808,576
$4,704,692
4,951,9921,018,0514,343,016
4,245,333
2,633,8051,628,3375,170,002
2,896,9372,298,9811,458,549
1,145,991311,989
2,698,4731,935,3042,806,666
395,318
8,264,8863,558,749
2,095,991180,911
4,314,491270,813
5,107,51885,373
1,363,967765,516166,294
2,503,399
1,373,0371,388,4222,775,0832,249,906
1,370,460401,201
4,304,3201,775,7352,684,8071,992,134
31,737,811 107,507,013 39,814,290 179,059,114 93,636,449
OTHER REAL ESTATE ACQUIRED FOR BANKING HOUSE PURPOSES
BuffaloRichmondNew OrleansKansas CityOklahoma CityHoustonLos Angeles
Total
255,000146,550
2751,O5O2396,2192497,850
78,81240,747
2,166,228
465,707
317,33629,464
812,507
112,111
112,111
720,707146,550751,050396,219497,850508,259
70,211
3,090,846
333,431146,550751,050396,219497,850101,416
70,211
2,296,727
1 Includes expenditures incident to construction programs carried in unallocated accounts pendingcompletion of programs and subsequent allocation of costs to appropriate accounts.
2 Includes cost of building on property.
120Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO. 10—NUMBER AND SALARIES OF OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS
[December 31, 1958]
Federal Reserve Bank(including branches)
BostonNew YorkPhiladelphia. . .Cleveland
RichmondAtlanta . . . .ChicagoSt. Louis
MinneapolisKansas City. . . . . . . . .DallasSan Francisco
Total . .
President
Annual salary
$35,00060,00030,00035,000
35,00035,00050,00035,000
35,00035,00035,00035,000
$455,000
Other officers
Number
23612537
35374132
22332939
414
Annual salaries
$323,5001,091,750
333,000509,056
459,400473,400592,950413,900
283,750439,400368,900482,000
$5,771,006
Employees1
Number
1,2843,7741,0021,598
1,3501,3822,7921,106
6311,043
9871,932
18,881
Annual salaries
$4,917,52817,210,5374,232,4036,777,823
5,132,6495,004,215
11,962,0934,357,352
2,413,8784,025,4733,729,0647,909,486
$77,672,501
Total
Number
1,3083,8361,0281,636
1,3861,4202,8341,139
6541,0771,0171,972
19,307
Annual salaries
$5,276,02818,362,2874,595,4037,321,879
5,627,0495,512,615
12,605,0434,806,252
2,732,6284,499,8734,132,9648,426,486
$83,898,507
1 Includes 697 part-time employees.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO. 11—FEDERAL RESERVE BANK DISCOUNT, INTEREST, AND COMMITMENT RATES
In effect December 31, 1958. For changes during the year, see "Record of Policy Actions of Board of Governors.'*
[Per cent per annum]
Type of transaction BostonNewYork
Phila-delphia
Cleve-land
Rich-mond Atlanta Chicago
St.Louis
Minne-apolis
KansasCity Dallas
SanFran-cisco
Discounts for and advances to member banks:Advances secured by Government obligations and dis-
counts of and advances secured by eligible paper(Sees. 13 and 13a of the Federal Reserve Act)
Other secured advances (Sec. 10(b) of the FederalReserve Act)
Advances to individuals, partnerships, or corporationsother than member banks secured by direct obligationsof the United States (last paragraph of Sec. 13 of theFederal Reserve Act)
Loans to industrial or commercial businesses under Sec.13b of the Federal Reserve Act, direct or in participationwith financing institutions
Discounts for and purchases from financing institutionsunder Sec. 13b of the Federal Reserve Act:
On portion for which institution is obligatedOn remaining portion
Commitments to make loans under Sec. 13b of the FederalReserve Act:
To industrial or commercial businessesTo financing institutions
3V2-6
2Y2
3
4-6
2Y2
3
4-6
Y2-IY2Y2-W2
2Y2
3
0(3)
4-1}4n
4-6
0)(3)
Y2-1}
2Y2
3
3^-5^
0)
2Y2
3
2Y2
3
3Y2
2%-SM
}43Y2-6
4-1}4-1}
2Y2
3
4-6
4-64-6
4-1}
2Y2
3
4-6
0)(3)
4-1}4-1}
2Y2
3
4r-6
(*)(8)
Y2-1Y2Y2-1Y2
2Y2
3
4-6
0)(8)
Y2-1Y2Y2-1Y2
1 Rate charged borrower by financing institution less commitment rate.2 Rate charged borrower but not to exceed 1 per cent above the discount rate.3 Rate charged borrower.4 Twenty-five per cent of loan rate on disbursed portion; }4 per cent per annum on undisbursed portion.5 Rate on disbursed portion; M per cent per annum on undisbursed portion of loan.NOTE.—Maximum maturities. Discounts for and advances to member banks: 90 days for discounts and advances under Sections 13 and 13a of the Federal Reserve Act
except that discounts of certain bankers' acceptances and of agricultural paper may have maturities not exceeding 6 months and 9 months, respectively, and advances securedby obligations of Federal intermediate credit banks maturing within 6 months are limited to maximum maturities of 15 days; 4 months for advances under Section 10(b).Advances to individuals, partnerships, or corporations under the last paragraph of Section 13: 90 days. Industrial loans and commitments under Section 13b: 5 years.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO. 12—MEMBER BANK RESERVE REQUIREMENTS
[Per cent of deposits]
Effective date of change
1917—June 21
1936—Aug. 161937—Mar. 1
May 11938—Apr. 16
1941—Nov. 11942—Aug. 20
Sept. 14Oct. 3
1948—Feb. 27June 11Sept. 16, 24*
1949—May 1,5*June 30, July 1*Aug. 1, 11*Aug. 16, 18*Aug. 25Sept. 1
1951—Jan. 11. 16*Jan. 25, Feb. 1*
1953—July 1,9*1954—June 16, 24*
July 29, Aug. 1*
1958—Feb. 27, Mar. 1*Mar. 20, Apr. 1*Apr. 17Apr. 24
In effect Jan. 1, 1959
Present legal requirements:MinimumMaximum
Net demand deposits1
Centralreserve
city banks
13
193^22M2622M
26242220
22242624
""23y2""2322y2222324222120
1 9 ^19183^18
18
1326
Reservecity banks
10
151 7 ^20173^
20
22212019K19183^18192019
18
ioy2
1020
Countrybanks
7
ioy212M1412
14
1615141312
131413
12
113^11
11
714
Time deposits
Centralreserve andreserve city
banks
3
4 ^5M65
6
7 ^
65
6
5
5
36
Countrybanks
3
±y2
65
6
7H
6
5
6
5
5
36
1 Demand de*.demand deposit
eposits subject to reserve requirements which, beginning Aug. 23, 1935, have been totaldemand deposits minus cash items in process of collection and demand balances due from domesticbanks (also minus war loan and Series E bond accounts during the period Apr. 13, 1943-June 30, 1947).
* First-of-month or midmonth dates are changes at country banks, and other dates (usually Thurs.)are at central reserve or reserve city banks.
NO. 13—MAXIMUM INTEREST RATES PAYABLE ON TIME DEPOSITS1
[Per cent per annum]
Type of deposit
Savings deposits
Postal savings deposits.
Other time deposits payable:In 6 months or moreIn 90 days to 6 months.In less than 90 d a y s . . . .
Nov. 1, 1933—Jan. 31, 1935
Feb. 1, 1935—Dec. 31, 1935
23^
Jan. 1, 1936—Dec. 31, 1956
EffectiveJan. 1, 1957
i Maximum permissible rates for member banks established by Board of Governors in Regulation Qwhich provides that rate paid by a member bank may not exceed maximum rate payable by Statebanks or trust companies on like deposits under laws of State in which member bank is located SinceFeb. 1, 1936, maximum rates established by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for insured non-member banks, under authority of the Banking Act of 1935, have been the same as those in effect formember banks.
123Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO. 14—MARGIN REQUIREMENTS*
Prescribed by Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in accordance with SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934
[Per cent of market value]
Jan. 17,1951-
Feb. 20,1953
Feb. 20,1953-
Jan. 4,1955
Jan. 4,1955-
Apr. 22,1955
Apr. 23,1955-
Jan. 15,1958
Jan. 16,1958-
Aug. 4,1958
Aug. 5,1958-
Oct. 15,1958
Effec-tive
Oct. 16,1958
Regulation T:For extension of credit
by brokers anddealers on listed se-curities
For short salesRegulation U:
For loans by banks onstocks
7575
75
5050
50
6060
60
7070
70
5050
50
7070
70
9090
90
1 Regulations T and U limit the amount of credit that may be extended on a security by pre-scribing a maximum loan value, which is a specified percentage of its market value at the time of theextension; the "margin requirements" shown in this table are the difference between the marketvalue (100 per cent) and the maximum loan value. Changes on Feb. 20, 1953 and Jan. 4, 1955 wereeffective after the close of business on these dates.
NOTE.—For earlier data, see Banking and Monetary Statistics, Table 145, p. 504, and AnnualReport of the Board of Governors for 1948, p. 77, and for 1953, p. 76.
NO. 15—FEES AND RATES ESTABLISHED UNDER REGULATION V ON LOANSGUARANTEED PURSUANT TO DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT OF 1950
[In effect December 31, 1958]
Fees Payable to Guaranteeing Agency by Financing Institution on Guaranteed Portion of Loan
70 or less...7580859095Over 95 . . .
Percentage of loan guaranteed
Guarantee fee(percentage of
interest payableby borrower)
101520253035
40-50
Percentage ofany commitment
fee chargedborrower
101520253035
40-50
Maximum Rates Financing Institution May Charge Borrower
[Per cent per annum]
Interest rateCommitment rate.
124Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO* 16—PRINCIPAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES, AND NUMBER OF ALL BANKS, BY CLASSES, DECEMBER 31, 1958 AND 19571
[In millions of dollars]
Item
Loans and investments, total .
InvestmentsU. S. Govt. obligations . .Other securities . ..
Cash assets
Deposits, total
Other demandOther time
Total capital accounts
Number of banks.. . . .
Loans and investments, total..Loans . . .Investments
U. S. Govt. obligations.. .Other securities
Cash assets
Deposits, totalInterbank.Other demand.. . . . . . .Other time
Total capital accounts
Number of banks
Allbanks
Commercial banks
Total2Member banks
Total National State
Insurednonmember
Non-insured
Mutual savings banks
Total InsuredNon-
insured
December 31, 1958
221,485121,57199,91473,64126,27349,911
250,05718,174
134,38597,49821,705
14,020
185,16598,21486,95166,37620,57548,990
216,01718,171
134,35363,49318,486
13,501
154,86584,06170,80454,29916,50443,188
182,81617,414
114,27051,13215,460
6,312
99,27752,62746,65035,71410,93626,781
116,7149,802
72,10034,8129,643
4,578
55,58831,43524,15318,5855,568
16,407
66,1027,612
42,17016,3205,817
1,734
28,75913,68215,07711,3813,6965,504
31,696448
19,18512,0632,696
6,793
1,568484
1,084707377301
1,532309898325332399
36,32023,35712,9637,2655,698
921
34,0403
3234,0063,219
519
28,98019,1809,8005,2154,585
752
27,2772
3127,2432,473
241
7,3414,1773,1632,0501,113
169
6,763
16,762
746
278
December 31, 1957
203,849115,11588,73465,79222,94349,318
233,02017,022
127,89588,10220,428
14,090
170,06893,89976,16958,23917,93048,428
201,32617,021
127,86556,44017,368
13,568
142,35380,95061,40347,07914,32442,746
170,63716,328
109,01845,29014,554
6,393
91,20150,35040,85131,2349,617
26,786
109,0919,475
68,71230,9049,070
4,620
51,15230,60020,55215,8464,707
15,960
61,5456,853
40,30614,3865,483
1,773
26,26812,49313,77510,5123,2645,383
29,266425
17,96810,8732,500
6,753
1,473468
1,004660345301
1,449268879303317
425
33,78221,21612,5657,5525,013
890
31,6952
3131,6623,059
522
26,53517,1949,3415,4043,937
719
25,0222
2924,9912,309
239
7,2464,0223,2242,1481,076
171
6,672
16,671
751
283
1 All banks in the United States, and one in Alaska and one in the Virgin Islands that became national members in 1954 and 1957 respectively.2 Total for commercial banks excludes three member mutual savings banks.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO. 17—MEMBER BANK EARNINGS, BY CLASS OF BANK, 1958 AND 1957
[Dollar amounts in millions]
Item
EarningsOn U. S. Govt. securi-
tiesOn other securitiesOn loansAll other
ExpensesSalaries and wagesInterest on d e p o s i t s . . . .All other
Net current earningsbefore income taxes. .
Recoveries and profits1. . .Losses and charge-offs2. . .Net addition to valua-
tion reserves
Profits before incometaxes
Taxes on net income. . .
Net profitsGash dividends de-
clared3
(Per cent)Ratios:
Net current earningsbefore income taxest o -
Average total capi-tal accounts
Average total assets..Net profits to—
Average total capi-tal accounts
Average total assets..Average return on U. S.
Govt. securitiesAverage return on loans. .
Total
1958
$7,127
1,266411
4,3261,123
4,6171,9811,1231,512
2,510
754315
342
2 6061,148
1,457
646
16.61.32
9 . 7.77
2.455.35
1957
$6,771
1,168339
4,2081,056
4,2221,877
9271,418
2,549
160468
177
2,063895
1,169
604
18.11.42
8 . 3.65
2.535.32
Central reserve city banks
New
1958
$1,164
17061
699234
636300110227
528
11225
39
576276
300
160
16.41.55
9 . 3.88
2.394.40
York
1957
$1,136
13747
727225
592293
80220
544
2497
29
442209
233
152
18.21.70
7 .8.73
2.464.54
Chicago
1958
$272
5817
15740
142682549
130
5521
25
14069
71
26
18.41.51
9 . 9.82
2.374.47
1957
$274
4615
17241
136652349
137
1125
30
9341
53
24
20.61.65
7 .9.64
2.364.56
Reservecity banks
1958
$2,835
478151
1,759447
1,823777474572
1,012
325113
171
1 053490
563
258
18.11.35
10 1.75
2.455.39
1957
$2,664
426128
1,694415
1,666731398537
998
61166
43
849385
464
242
19.21.42
8 .9.66
2.535.30
Countrybanks
1958
$2,856
560183
1,712401
2,016836515664
840
262157
108
837313
524
202
15.01.16
9 4.72
2.495.94
1957
$2,697
558149
1,615374
1,827788427613
870
64180
75
679260
419
186
16.51.26
8 0.61
2.575.91
1 Includes recoveries credited to valuation reserves.2 Includes losses charged to valuation reserves.8 Includes interest on capital notes and debentures.
126Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO. 18—ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN NUMBER OF BANKING OFFICES DURING 19581
Number of banks, Dec. 31,1957R
Changes during 1958New banks 'SuspensionsConsolidations and absorptions:
Banks converted into branches.Other
Liquidations:4
VoluntaryOther
Conversions:National into State . . . .State into national
Federal Reserve Membership:5
Admissions of State banksWithdrawals of State banks
Federal Deposit insurance:6
Admissions of State banksNet increase or decrease
Number of banks, Dec. 31,1958
Number of branches and addi-tional offices, Dec. 31,1957 7 . .
Changes during 1958De novo branchesBanks converted into branches.. .DiscontinuedInterclass changes—net ^Net increase
Number of branches and addi-tional offices, Dec. 31,19587 ..
Number of banking facilities,Dec. 31, 19579
Changes during 1958EstablishedDiscontinuedInterclass changeNet increase . . .
Number of banking facilities,Dec 31 19589
Allbanks
14,090
+97- 8
-129- 2 5
- 4- 1
- 7 0
14,020
8,373
+567+129
- 3 1
+665
9,038
236
+ 15- 3
+12
248
Commercial and stock savings banksand nondeposit trust companies
Total
13,568
+97- 8
-126- 2 5
- 4- 1
-67
13,501
7,968
+540+126
- 3 0+9
+645
8,613
236
+ 15- 3
+12
248
Memberbanks
Na-tional 1
4,620
+19- 1
- 5 6- 9
— 1+6
- 4 2
4,578
3,993
+306+66-16- 8
+348
4,341
185
+11- 3+8
193
Statemem-ber 2
1,773
+2
- 2 5- 5
- 3
+7- 1 5
- 3 9
1,734
2,173
+113+39- 1 2+47
+ 187
2,360
27
+2+1+3
30
Nonmemberbanks
In-sured
6,753
+632
- 4 3- 1 0
—3
+1- 3
- 6+15+28+40
6,793
1,765
+120+20
- 2- 3 0
+108
1,873
24
+2- 1
+1
25
Non-in-
sured 2
425
+13
- 2- 1
-i
- 1
- 1
- 2 8- 2 6
399
37
+1+1
39
Mutualsavingsbanks
In-sured 2
239
- 3
+5+2241
296
+14+3
y
+9
305
Non-in-
sured
283
c
- 5
278
109
+13
- 2+ 11
120
R Revised.1 Excludes banks and branches in United States territories and possessions except one national
bank in Alaska with no branches, and one in the Virgin Islands with one branch.2 State member bank figures and insured mutual savings bank figures both include 3 member mutual
savings banks, not included in the total for "commercial banks." State member bank figures alsoinclude one noninsured trust company without deposits.
8 Exclusive of new banks organized to succeed operating banks.4 Exclusive of liquidations incident to the succession, conversion, and absorption of banks.5 Exclusive of conversions of State member banks into national banks.6 Exclusive of insured nonmember banks converted into national banks or admitted to Federal
Reserve membership, and vice versa.7 Except banking facilities which are shown separately; see note 9.8 For details of interclass branch changes, see Federal Reserve Bulletin, February 1959.9 Banking facilities (other than branches) that are provided at military and other Government
establishments through arrangements made by the Treasury Department.
127
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO. 19—NUMBER OF BANKING OFFICES ON FEDERAL RESERVE PAR LIST AND NOTON PAR LIST, DECEMBER 31, 19581
FederalReserve Dis-trict, State,
or other area
DISTRICTBostonNew York2.. .Philadelphia..Cleveland.. . .Richmond... .AtlantaChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolis. .Kansas City..DallasSan Francisco2
Total
STATEAlabama . . . .
ArkansasCalifornia....ColoradoConnecticut. .DelawareDist of Col...Florida . . . .Georgia
Illinois
Iowa, • •
Kentucky. . . .Louisiana. . . .IvlaineMaryland. .. .
MichiganMinnesotaMississippi. . .Missouri . . .MontanaNebraska . . . .NevadaN. HampshireNew Jersey.New Mexico..New York .N. Carolina...N. Dakota. . .OhioOklahomaOregon
Pennsylvania.Rhode Island.S. Carolina.. .S. Dakota . . . .Tennessee. .. .TexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashington. .West Virginia.Wisconsin. .. .Wyoming. . . .Alaska2
Hawaii2
Puerto Rico 2.V I 2
Total2
Banks
422630672964963
1,3232,4731,4671,2931,7631,097
374
13,441
2397
237119158752713
271410
28943
45866959336018654
142169393685194609114417
674
25953
430193155606386
54
7379
144172296969
4957
31289
183551
52185
102
Branches& offices
6591,674
568823
1,04244598628012964
1252,247
9,042
6213835
1,4626
1604460137681
4
248163
14116156118208323493
6124
412
333
36743
1,230412
27551
15165
67185
12854
183236830
234253
1521
1867
1084
On par list
Total
Banks
422630672964806757
2,4731,174
6941,7571,014
359
11,722
1497
128119158752713
22713428
942
458669591360
7954
14216939328553
555114417
674
25953
43010657
606380
54
7379
7671
214933
4957
31189
182551
5235
102
Branches& offices
6591,674
5688238923999862068564
1132,240
8,709
6113815
1,4626
16044601274814
248163
14116129118208323493
659
412
333
36743
1,230268
8551
15165
67185
12229
167236830
234253
1521
1167
1084
Member
Banks
286530513589455401
1,018489476749631169
6,306
934
75719441
99
1156517
524
232168212108523565
129225209
3517285
1405
5222235
3754740
385224
17
5635
316083
5752033
20235
11216039
1
1
Branches& offices
5321,463
466718583330586133394582
1,960
6,937
59116
121,318
512619491064754
1655
1079
10479
126273409
633
412
292
33321
1,163150
2484
13147
582669324
123235920
165246
241
131
Nonmember
Banks
136100159375351356
1,455685218
1,008383190
5,416
563
53486434184
1126911
418
226501379252
27197740
1687618
38329
2771
223718555917
22115637
1744
4511
131358
2924
1095470
3911325
101
Branches& offices
127211102105309
69400
73461931
280
1,772
222
3144
13425112
106
83158
4372539825084
26
41
342267
1186
672
18
891929
544
91069
7
128
116795
3
Not on par list(nonmember)
Banks
157566
293599
68315
1,719
90
i()9
44276
1
2
107
40014154
8798
6
681018236
1
1
15
Branches& offices
15046
7444
127
333
1
20
12
27
65
14419
62516
7
1 Comprises all commercial banking offices on which checks are drawn, including 248 bankingfacilities. Number of banks and branches differs from Table 18 because of banks and trust companieson which no checks are drawn, 3 mutual savings member banks, and banks in Alaska, Hawaii, PuertoRico, and the Virgin Islands.
2 Alaska and Hawaii, assigned to the San Francisco District for check clearing and collection pur-poses; Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands assigned to the New York District.
128Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NO. 20—OPEN MARKET TRANSACTIONS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEMDURING 1958
[In millions of dollars]
Month
JanuaryFebruary.. . .MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember.. .OctoberNovember. . .December
Total, 1958
Net change inholdings
U.S.Govern-
mentsecurities
andaccept-ances
-932-89
+385+51
+485+1,280
-969+865-364+464+784+133
+2,092
U.S.Govern-
mentsecurities
-908-91
+388+53
+481+1,276
-958+866-360+456+786+118
+2,108
U. S. Governmentsecurities
Outrighttransactions
Grossmarket
purchases
100185472204627
1,276300
1,534167584996309
6,754
Grossmarket
sales
317866026
50266851254
289119
2,633
Cashredemp-
tions
17119024
125147
756
14144117
1,590
Repurchaseagreements
Grosspur-
chases
989370265308
312
67
305514500
3,630
Grosssales
1,509370265308
312
67
234424565
4,054
Bankers'acceptances
Netout-right
- 1
+2- 2+4
A
+8+9+1
Netrepur-chases
- 2 3
+6
- 1 8
NOTE.—Details may not add to totals because of rounding.
129Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE DIRECTORIES
AND MEETINGS
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THEFEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
[December 31, 1958] Term ExpiresW M . MCC. MARTIN, JR., of New York, Chairman January 31, 1970C. CANBY BALDERSTON of Pennsylvania, Vice Chairman January 31, 1966M. S. SZYMCZAK of Illinois January 31, 1962A. L. MILLS, JR., of Oregon January 31, 1972J. L. ROBERTSON of Nebraska January 31, 1964CHAS. N. SHEPARDSON of Texas January 31, 1968
ELLIOTT THURSTON, Assistant to the BoardWINFIELD W. RIEFLER, Assistant to the ChairmanWOODLIEF THOMAS, Economic Adviser to the BoardJEROME W. SHAY, Legislative CounselCHARLES MOLONY, Special Assistant to the BoardMERRITT SHERMAN, Secretary
KENNETH A. KENYON, Assistant SecretaryCLARKE L. FAUVER, Assistant Secretary
HOWARD H. HACKLEY, General CounselFREDERIC SOLOMON, Assistant General CounselDAVID B. HEXTER, Assistant General CounselG. HOWLAND CHASE, Assistant General CounselTHOMAS J. O'CONNELL, Assistant General Counsel
RALPH A. YOUNG, Director, Division of Research and StatisticsFRANK R. GARFIELD, Adviser, Division of Research and StatisticsGUY E. NOYES, Adviser, Division of Research and StatisticsROLAND I. ROBINSON, Adviser, Division of Research and StatisticsSUSAN S. BURR, Associate Adviser, Division of Research and StatisticsALBERT R. KOCH, Associate Adviser, Division of Research and StatisticsKENNETH B. WILLIAMS, Associate Adviser, Division of Research and StatisticsLEWIS N. DEMBITZ, Research Associate, Division of Research and Statistics
ARTHUR W. MARGET, Director, Division of International FinanceJ. HERBERT FURTH, Associate Adviser, Division of International FinanceA. B. HERSEY, Associate Adviser, Division of International FinanceROBERT L. SAMMONS, Associate Adviser, Division of International Finance
ROBERT F. LEONARD, Director, Division of Bank OperationsJOHN R. FARRELL, Associate Director, Division of Bank OperationsGERALD M. CONKLING, Assistant Director, Division of Bank OperationsM. B. DANIELS, Assistant Director, Division of Bank Operations
ROBERT C. MASTERS, Director, Division of ExaminationsC. C. HOSTRUP, Assistant Director, Division of ExaminationsFRED A. NELSON, Assistant Director, Division of ExaminationsGLENN M. GOODMAN, Assistant Director, Division of ExaminationsHENRY BENNER, Assistant Director, Division of ExaminationsJAMES C. SMITH, Assistant Director, Division of ExaminationsLLOYD M. SCHAEFFER, Chief Federal Reserve Examiner, Division of Examinations
EDWIN J. JOHNSON, Director, Division of Personnel AdministrationH. FRANKLIN SPRECHER, JR., Assistant Director, Division of Personnel Adminis-
trationJOSEPH E. KELLEHER, Director, Division of Administrative ServicesGARDNER L. BOOTHE, II, Administrator, Office of Defense LoansJ. J. CONNELL, Controller, Office of the Controller
SAMPSON H. BASS, Assistant Controller, Office of the ControllerINNIS D. HARRIS, Coordinator, Office of Defense Planning
132Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE[December 31, 1958}
MEMBERS
WM. MCC. MARTIN, JR., Chamnan (Board of Governors)ALFRED HAYES, Vice Chairman (Elected by Federal Reserve Bank of New York)C. CANBY BALDERSTON (Board of Governors)W. D. FULTON (Elected by Federal Reserve Banks of Cleveland and Chicago)W. H. IRONS (Elected by Federal Reserve Banks of Atlanta, St. Louis, and Dallas)HUGH LEACH (Elected by Federal Reserve Banks of Boston, Philadelphia, and Rich-
mond)H. N. MANGELS (Elected by Federal Reserve Banks of Minneapolis, Kansas City, and
San Francisco)A. L. MILLS, JR. (Board of Governors)J. L. ROBERTSON (Board of Governors)CHAS. N. SHEPARDSON (Board of Governors)M. S. SZYMCZAK (Board of Governors)
OFFICERS
WINFIELD W. RIEFLER, Secretary J. DEWEY DAANE, Associate EconomistELLIOTT THURSTON, Assistant Secretary L. MERLE HOSTETLER, Associate EconomistMERRITT SHERMAN, Assistant Secretary ARTHUR W. MARGET, Associate EconomistHOWARD H. HACKLEY, General Counsel H. V. ROELSE, Associate EconomistFREDERIC SOLOMON, Assistant General CHARLS E. WALKER, Associate Economist
Counsel OLIVER P. WHEELER, Associate EconomistWOODLIEF THOMAS, Economist RALPH A. YOUNG, Associate Economist
AGENT
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK
ROBERT G. ROUSE, Manager of SystemOpen Market Account
During 1958 the Federal Open Market Committee met at least every three weeks, asindicated in the Record of Policy Actions taken by the Committee (see pages 32-71of this report).
133Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL[December 31, 1958]
MEMBERS
District No. 1—LLOYD D. BRACE, President, The First National Bank of Boston, Bos-ton, Massachusetts.
District No. 2—ADRIAN M. MASSIE, Chairman of the Board, The New York TrustCompany, New York, New York.
District No. 3—CASIMIR A. SIENKIEWICZ, President, Central-Penn National Bank ofPhiladelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
District No. 4—FRANK R. DENTON, Vice Chairman of the Board, Mellon NationalBank and Trust Company, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
District No. 5—JOHN S. ALFRIEND, Chairman of the Board and President, NationalBank of Commerce, Norfolk, Virginia.
District No. 6—JOHN A. SIBLEY, Chairman of the Board, Trust Company of Georgia,Atlanta, Georgia.
District No. 7—HOMER J. LIVINGSTON, President, The First National Bank of Chi-cago, Chicago, Illinois.
District No. 8—WILLIAM A. MCDONNELL, Chairman of the Board, First NationalBank in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
District No. 9—GORDON MURRAY, President, First National Bank of Minneapolis,Minneapolis, Minnesota.
District No. 10—R. CROSBY KEMPER, Chairman of the Board and President, TheCity National Bank and Trust Company of Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
District No. 11—WALTER B. JACOBS, President, The First National Bank of Shreve-port, Shreveport, Louisiana.
District No. 12—FRANK L. KING, President, California Bank, Los Angeles, California.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
FRANK R. DENTON, ex officio HOMER J. LIVINGSTON, ex officio
LLOYD D. BRACE ADRIAN M. MASSIECASIMIR A. SIENKIEWICZ
OFFICERS
President, FRANK R. DENTON Vice President, HOMER J. LIVINGSTONSecretary, HERBERT V. PROCHNOW
Assistant Secretary, WILLIAM J. KORSVIK
Meetings of the Federal Advisory Council were held on February 17-18, May 19-20,September 15-16, and November 17-18, 1958. The Board of Governors met with theCouncil on February 18, May 20, September 16, and November 18. The Council isrequired by law to meet in Washington at least four times each year and is authorizedby the Federal Reserve Act to consult with and advise the Board on all matters withinthe jurisdiction of the Board.
134Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES[December 31, 1958]
CHAIRMEN AND DEPUTY CHAIRMEN OP BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
Federal Reserve Bank of—
Boston
New York
Philadelphia
Cleveland
Richmond
Atlanta
Chicago
St. Louis
Minneapolis
Kansas City
Dallas
San Francisco
Chairman andFederal Reserve Agent
Robert C. Sprague
John E. Bierwirth
Henderson Supplee, Jr
Arthur B. Van Buskirk
John B. Woodward, Jr.. . .
Walter M. Mitchell
Bert R. Prall
Pierre B. McBride
Leslie N. Perrin
Raymond W. Hall
Robert J. Smith
A. H. Brawner
Deputy Chairman
Harvey P. Hood
Forrest F. Hill
Lester V. Chandler
Joseph H. Thompson
Alonzo G. Decker, Jr.
Harllee Branch, Jr.
J. Stuart Russell
J. H. Longwell
O. B. Jesness
Joe W. Seacrest
Hal Bogle
Y. Frank Freeman
CONFERENCE OF CHAIRMEN
The Chairmen of the Federal Reserve Banks are organized into a Conference ofChairmen which meets from time to time to consider matters of common interest andto consult and advise the Board of Governors. A meeting of the Conference of Chair-men was held on December 4-5, 1958, and was attended by members of the Board ofGovernors, and also by the Deputy Chairmen of the Federal Reserve Banks.
Mr. Hall, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, was elected Chair-man of the Conference and of the Executive Committee in December 1957. Mr. Smith,Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, and Mr. Mitchell, Chairman of theFederal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, served with Mr. Hall as members of the ExecutiveCommittee, Mr. Smith also serving as Vice Chairman of the Conference.
At the meeting held in December 1958, Mr. Smith was elected Chairman of theConference and of the Executive Committee. Mr. Mitchell was elected Vice Chairmanand a member of the Executive Committee, and Mr. Perrin, Chairman of the FederalReserve Bank of Minneapolis, was elected as the other member of the ExecutiveCommittee.
135
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
136 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.
DIRECTORS
Class A and Class B directors are elected by the member banks of the district. ClassC directors are appointed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
The Class A directors are chosen as representatives of member banks and, as a matterof practice, are active officers of member banks. The Class B directors may not, underthe law, be officers, directors, or employees of banks. At the time of their election theymust be actively engaged in their district in commerce, agriculture, or some other indus-trial pursuit.
The Class C directors may not, under the law, be officers, directors, employees, orstockholders of banks. They are appointed by the Board of Governors as representa-tives not of any particular group or interest, but of the public interest as a whole.
Federal Reserve Bank branches have either five or seven directors, of whom a ma-jority are appointed by the Board of Directors of the parent Federal Reserve Bank andthe others are appointed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
District 1—BostonTerm
ExpiresDIRECTORS Dec. 31
Class A:Oliver B. Ellsworth President, Riverside Trust Company, Hartford,
Conn 1958William D. Ireland President, Second Bank-State Street Trust Com-
pany, Boston, Mass 1959Arthur F. Maxwell President, The First National Bank of Bidde-
ford, Biddeford, Maine I960
Class B.-Harry E. Umphrey President, Aroostook Potato Growers, Inc.,
Presque Isle, Maine 1958Milton P. Higgins President, Norton Company, Worcester, Mass. 1959Stanley M. Cooper Chairman of the Board, The Fafnir Bearing
Company, New Britain, Conn I960
Class C:Harvey P. Hood President, H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc., Boston,
Mass 1958Nils Y. Wessell President, Tufts University, Medford, Mass.. . 1959Robert C. Sprague Chairman and Treasurer, Sprague Electric
Company, North Adams, Mass I960
District 2—New YorkClass A:
Howard C. Sheperd Chairman of the Board, The First NationalCity Bank of New York, New York, N. Y. 1958
Charles W. Bitzer President, City Trust Company, Bridgeport,Conn 1959
Cyrus M. Higley President and Trust Officer, The ChenangoCounty National Bank and Trust Companyof Norwich, Norwich, N. Y I960
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 137
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.
TermExpires
DIRECTORS—Cont. Dec.31Class B:
Clarence Francis Director, General Foods Corporation, NewYork, N. Y 1958
Lansing P. Shield President, The Grand Union Company, EastPaterson, N. J 1959
Augustus C. Long Chairman of the Board, The Texas Company,New York, N. Y I960
Class C:Franz Schneider Consultant to Newmont Mining Corporation,
New York, N. Y 1958John E. Bierwirth Chairman, National Distillers and Chemical
Corporation, New York, N. Y 1959Forrest F. Hill Vice President, The Ford Foundation, New
York, N. Y I960
Buffalo BranchAppointed by Federal Reserve Bank:
John W. Remington President, Lincoln Rochester Trust Company,Rochester, N. Y 1958
Leland B. Bryan President, First National Bank and Trust Com-pany, Corning, N. Y 1958
Vernon Alexander President, The National Bank of Geneva,Geneva, N. Y 1959
E. Perry Spink President, Liberty Bank of Buffalo, Buffalo,N. Y 1960
Appointed by Board of Governors:Ralph F. Peo Chairman and President, Houdaille Industries,
Inc., Buffalo, N. Y 1958Raymond E. Olson President, Taylor Instrument Companies,
Rochester, N. Y 1959Daniel M. Dalrymple Partner and Manager, Pomona Fruit Farms,
Appleton, N. Y I960
District 3—Philadelphia
Class A:Lindley S. Hurff President and Trust Officer, The First National
Bank of Milton, Milton, Pa 1958Geoffrey S. Smith President, Girard Trust Corn Exchange Bank,
Philadelphia, Pa 1959William B. Brosius President, National Bank of Chester County
and Trust Company, West Chester, Pa I960
Class B:Charles E. Oakes Chairman of the Board, Pennsylvania Power
and Light Company, Allentown, Pa 1958R. Russell Pippin Treasurer, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Com-
pany, Wilmington, Del 1959
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 139
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.
TermExpires
DIRECTORS—Cont. Dec. 31Anthony Haswell President, The Dayton Malleable Iron Com-
pany, Dayton, Ohio 1959W. Bay Irvine President, Marietta College, Marietta, Ohio.. I960
Pittsburgh Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:Sumner E. Nichols President, Security-Peoples Trust Company,
Erie, Pa 1958Frank C. Irvine President, First National Bank in Tarentum,
Tarentum, Pa 1959Lawrence O. Hotchkiss President, The First National Bank of Mercer,
Mercer, Pa I960Irving W. Wilson Chairman of the Board, Aluminum Company
of America, Pittsburgh, Pa I960
Appointed by Board of Governors:Douglas M. Moorhead Farmer, North East, Pa 1958John T. Ryan, Jr President, Mine Safety Appliances Company,
Pittsburgh, Pa 1959John C. Warner President, Carnegie Institute of Technology,
Pittsburgh, Pa I960
District 5—Richmond
Class A:(Vacancy) 1958Robert Gage President, The Commercial Bank, Chester,
S. C 1959Denver L. Morgan Executive Vice President and Cashier, The
Charleston National Bank, Charleston,W. Va I960
Class B:L. Vinton Hershey President, Hagerstown Shoe Company, Hagers-
town, Md 1958Wm. A. L. Sibley Vice President and Treasurer, Monarch Mills,
Union, S. C 1959Robert O. Huffman President, Drexel Furniture Company, Drexel,
N. C I960
Class C:John B. Woodward, Jr Chairman of the Board, Newport News Ship-
building & Dry Dock Company, NewportNews, Va 1958
Alonzo G. Decker, Jr Executive Vice President, The Black & DeckerManufacturing Company, Towson, Md 1959
D. W. Colvard Dean of Agriculture, North Carolina StateCollege of Agriculture and Engineering,Raleigh, N. C I960
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
138 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.
TermExpires
DIRECTORS—Cont. Dec. 31
Bayard L. England President, Atlantic City Electric Company, At-lantic City, N. J 1960
Class C:Henderson Supplee, Jr President, The Atlantic Refining Company,
Philadelphia, Pa 1958Lester V. Chandler Professor of Economics, Princeton University,
Princeton, N. J 1959Walter E. Hoadley, Jr Treasurer, Armstrong Cork Company, Lancas-
ter, Pa I960
District 4—Cleveland
Class A:King E. Fauver Director, The Savings Deposit Bank and Trust
Company, Elyria, Ohio 1958John A. Byerly President, Fidelity Trust Company, Pittsburgh,
Pa 1959Paul A. Warner President, The Oberlin Savings Bank Com-
pany, Oberlin, Ohio I960
Class B:Charles Z. Hardwick Executive Vice President, The Ohio Oil Com-
pany, Findlay, Ohio 1958George P. MacNichol, Jr President, Libbey • Owens • Ford Glass Com-
pany, Toledo, Ohio 1959Joseph B. Hall President, The Kroger Co., Cincinnati, Ohio I960
Class C:Arthur B. Van Buskirk Vice President and Governor, T. Mellon and
Sons, Pittsburgh, Pa 1958Joseph H. Thompson President, The M. A. Hanna Company, Cleve-
land, Ohio 1959Aubrey J. Brown Professor of Agricultural Marketing and Head
of Department of Agricultural Economics,University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky I960
Cincinnati Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:William A. Mitchell President, The Central Trust Company, Cin-
cinnati, Ohio 1958Franklin A. McCracken Executive Vice President and Trust Officer,
The Newport National Bank, Newport, Ky. 1959Roger Drackett President, The Drackett Company, Cincinnati,
Ohio 1960Thomas M. Wolfe President, The Athens National Bank, Athens,
Ohio 1960
Appointed by Board of Governors:Ivan Jett Farmer, Georgetown, Ky 1958
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
140 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.
TermExpires
DIRECTORS—Cont. Dec. 31
Baltimore BranchAppointed by Federal Reserve Bank:
Stanley B. Trott President, Maryland Trust Company, Balti-more, Md 1958
John W. Stout President, The Parkersburg National Bank,Parkersburg, W. Va 1958
James W. McElroy President, First National Bank of Baltimore,Baltimore, Md 1959
J. N. Shumate President, The Farmers National Bank ofAnnapolis, Annapolis, Md I960
Appointed by Board of Governors:Wm. Purnell Hall President, Maryland Shipbuilding and Dry-
dock Company, Inc., Baltimore, Md 1958Gordon M. Cairns Dean of Agriculture, University of Maryland,
College Park, Md 1959Clarence R. Zarfoss Vice President, Western Maryland Railway
Company, Baltimore, Md I960
Charlotte Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:I. W. Stewart Chairman of the Board, American Commercial
Bank, Charlotte, N. C 1958G. G. Watts President, The Merchants & Planters National
Bank, Gaffney, S. C 1958Charles D. Parker Vice Chairman of the Board and First Execu-
tive Vice President, First Union NationalBank of North Carolina, Charlotte, N. C. . 1959
Ernest Patton Chairman of the Board, The Peoples NationalBank of Greenville, Greenville, S. C I960
Appointed by Board of Governors:T. Henry Wilson President and Treasurer, Henredon Furniture
Industries, Inc., Morganton, N. C 1958William H. Grier Executive Vice President, Rock Hill Printing
& Finishing Company, Rock Hill, S. C 1959George H. Aull Agricultural Economist, Clemson College,
Clemson, S. C I960
District 6-AtlantaClass A:
William C. Carter Chairman and President, Gulf National Bank,Gulfport, Miss 1958
Roland L. Adams President, Bank of York, York, Ala.. 1959W. C. Bowman Chairman of the Board, The First National
Bank of Montgomery, Montgomery, Ala... I960Class B.-
Donald Comer Chairman of the Board, Avondale Mills, Bir-mingham, Ala 1958
Joseph T. Lykes Chairman and Director, Lykes Bros. Steam-ship Company, Inc., Tampa, Fla 1959
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM l 4 l
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.
TermExpires
DIRECTORS—Cont. Dec, 51Pollard Turman President, J. M. Tull Metal & Supply Com-
pany, Inc., Atlanta, Ga I960
Class C:Walter M. Mitchell Vice President, The Draper Corporation, At-
lanta, Ga 1958Harllee Branch, Jr President, The Southern Company, Atlanta,
Ga 1959Henry G. Chalkley, Jr President, The Sweet Lake Land & Oil Com-
pany, Lake Charles, La I960
Birmingham Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:Robert M. Cleckler President, First National Bank of Childers-
burg, Childersburg, Ala 1958E. W. McLeod Chairman, First National Bank of Decatur,
Decatur, Ala 1958R. J. Murphy Vice President, Citizens-Farmers & Merchants
Bank, Brewton, Ala 1959John C. Persons Chairman of the Board, The First National
Bank of Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala.... I960Appointed by Board of Governors:
John E. Urquhart Chairman, Woodward Iron Company, Wood-ward, Ala 1958
Adolph Weil, Sr President, Weil Brothers-Cotton, Inc., Mont-gomery, Ala 1959
Selden Sheffield Cattleman, Greensboro, Ala I960
Jacksonville Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:Linton E. Allen Chairman, The First National Bank at Or-
lando, Orlando, Fla 1958W. E. Ellis Chairman and President, The Commercial
Bank and Trust Company, Ocala, Fla 1958James G. Garner President and Chairman, Little River Bank
and Trust Company, Miami, Fla 1959C. B. McLeod President, Bank of Crestview, Crestview, Fla. I960
Appointed by Board of Governors:Harry M. Smith President and Manager, Winter Garden Orna-
mental Nursery, Inc., Winter Garden, Fla. 1958McGregor Smith Chairman of the Board, Florida Power and
Light Company, Miami, Fla 1959J. Wayne Reitz President, University of Florida, Gainesville,
Fla I960
Nashville Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:Stewart Campbell President, The Harpeth National Bank of
Franklin, Franklin, Tenn 1958
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
142 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.
TermExpires
DIRECTORS—Cont. Dec. 31
C. L. Wilson Chairman and President, The Cleveland Na-tional Bank, Cleveland, Tenn 1958
Jo H. Anderson President, Park National Bank of Knoxville,Knoxville, Tenn 1959
P. D. Houston, Jr President, First American National Bank,Nashville, Tenn I960
Appointed by Board of Governors:V. S. Johnson, Jr Chairman of the Board and President, Alad-
din Industries, Inc., Nashville, Tenn 1958Frank B. Ward Dean, College of Business Administration,
University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tenn. 1959W. N. Krauth President and General Manager, Colonial Bak-
ing Company of Nashville, Nashville, Tenn. I960
New Orleans Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:H. A. Pharr President, The First National Bank of Mobile,
Mobile, Ala 1958(Vacancy) 1958J. Spencer Jones President, The Citizens National Bank in
Hammond, Hammond, La 1959D. U. Maddox President, The Commercial National Bank and
Trust Company of Laurel, Laurel, Miss I960Appointed by Board of Governors:
G. H. King, Jr President, King Lumber Industries, Canton,Miss 1958
E. E. Wild Rice grower, Midland, La 1959Frank A. Godchaux, III Vice President, Louisiana State Rice Milling
Company, Inc., Abbeville, La I960
District 7—ChicagoClass A:
Nugent R. Oberwortmann President, The North Shore National Bank ofChicago, Chicago, 111 1958
Vivian W. Johnson President, First National Bank, Cedar Falls,Iowa 1959
Walter J. Cummings Chairman, Continental Illinois National Bankand Trust Company of Chicago, Chicago,111 1960
Class B:William J. Grede President, Grede Foundries, Inc., Milwaukee,
Wis 1958William A. Hanley Director, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianap-
olis, Ind 1959G. F. Langenohl Treasurer and Assistant Secretary, Allis-
Chalmers Manufacturing Company, Milwau-kee, Wis I960
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 143
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.
TermExpires
DIRECTORS—Cont. Dec. 31
Class C.-Robert P. Briggs Executive Vice President, Consumers Power
Company, Jackson, Mich 1958J. Stuart Russell Farm Editor, The Des Moines Register &
Tribune, Des Moines, Iowa 1959Bert R. Prall Winnetka, 111 I960
Detroit Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:Raymond T. Perring President, The Detroit Bank and Trust Com-
pany, Detroit, Mich 1958Ira A. Moore General Vice President, Old Kent Bank and
Trust Company, Grand Rapids, Mich 1959William A. Mayberry President, Manufacturers National Bank of
Detroit, Detroit, Mich I960Ernest W. Potter President, Citizens Commercial & Savings
Bank, Flint, Mich I960Appointed by Board of Governors:
C. V. Patterson Executive Vice President, The Upjohn Com-pany, Kalamazoo, Mich 1958
J. Thomas Smith President, Detroit Harvester Company, Detroit,Mich 1959
John A. Hannah President, Michigan State University, EastLansing, Mich I960
District 8—St. LouisClass A:
J. E. Etherton President, The Carbondale National Bank,Carbondale, 111 1958
Kenton R. Cravens President, Mercantile Trust Company, St.Louis, Mo 1959
H. Lee Cooper President, Ohio Valley National Bank of Hen-derson, Henderson, Ky I960
Class B:S. J. Beauchamp, Jr President, Terminal Warehouse Co., Little
Rock, Ark 1958Harold O. McCutchan Executive Vice President, Mead Johnson &
Company, Evansville, Ind 1959Leo J. Wieck Vice President and Treasurer, The May De-
partment Stores Co., St. Louis, Mo I960Class C:
J. H. Longwell Director, Division of Agricultural Sciences,University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo 1958
Pierre B. McBride President, Porcelain Metals Corporation, Louis-ville, Ky 1959
Jesse D. Wooten Executive Vice President, Mid-South ChemicalCorporation, Memphis, Tenn I960
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
144 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.
TermExpires
DIRECTORS—Cont. Dec. 31
Little Rock Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:J. V. Satterfield, Jr Chairman of the Board, The First National
Bank in Little Rock, Little Rock, Ark 1958Donald Barger President, Peoples Exchange Bank, Russell-
ville, Ark 1959J. W. Bellamy, Jr President, National Bank of Commerce of Pine
Bluff, Pine Bluff, Ark I960E. C. Benton President, Fordyce Bank and Trust Company,
Fordyce, Ark I960
Appointed by Board of Governors:
Waldo E. Tiller President, Tiller Tie and Lumber Company,Inc., Little Rock, Ark 1958
T. Winfred Bell President, Bush-Caldwell Company, LittleRock, Ark 1959
Robert H. Alexander Owner-operator, Land's End Plantation, Scott,Ark I960
Louisville Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:Magnus J. Kreisle President, The Tell City National Bank, Tell
City, Ind 1958Merle E. Robertson Chairman of the Board and President, Liberty
National Bank and Trust Company of Louis-ville, Louisville, Ky 1959
W. Scott Mclntosh President, State Bank of Hardinsburg, Hardins-burg, Ind I960
John G. Russell President, The Peoples First National Bank &Trust Company of Paducah, Paducah, Ky.. . I960
Appointed by Board of Governors:
J. D. Monin, Jr Farmer, Oakland, Ky 1958David F. Cocks Vice President and Treasurer, Standard Oil
Company (Kentucky), Louisville, Ky 1959Philip Davidson President, University of Louisville, Louisville,
Ky I960
Memphis Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:
J. H. Harris President, The First National Bank of Wynne,Wynne, Ark 1958
John K. Wilson President, The First National Bank of WestPoint, West Point, Miss 1959
John E. Brown President, Union Planters National Bank ofMemphis, Memphis, Tenn I960
Simpson Russell President, The National Bank of Commerce ofJackson, Jackson, Tenn I960
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 145
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.
TermExpires
DIRECTORS—Cont. Dec. 31
Appointed by Board of Governors:Frank Lee Wesson President, Wesson Farms, Inc., Victoria, Ark. 1958John D. Williams Chancellor, The University of Mississippi,
University, Miss 1959S. L. Kopald, Jr Executive Vice President, HumKo Division,
National Dairy Products Corporation, Mem-phis, Tenn I960
District 9—Minneapolis
Class A:
John A. Moorhead President, Northwestern National Bank ofMinneapolis, Minneapolis, Minn 1958
Harold N. Thomson Vice President, Farmers & Merchants Bank,Presho, S. D 1959
Harold C. Refling Cashier, First National Bank in Bottineau,Bottineau, N. D I960
Class B:
T. G. Harrison Chairman of the Board, Super Valu Stores,Inc., Hopkins, Minn 1958
J. E. Corette President and General Manager, MontanaPower Company, Butte, Mont 1959
Ray C. Lange President, Chippewa Canning Company, Inc.,Chippewa Falls, Wis I960
Class C:
John H. Warden President, Upper Peninsula Power Company,Houghton, Mich 1958
Leslie N. Perrin Director, General Mills, Inc., Minneapolis,Minn 1959
O. B. Jesness Agricultural Economist, St. Paul, Minn I960
Helena Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:
J. Willard Johnson Financial Vice President and Treasurer, West-ern Life Insurance Company, Helena,Mont 1958
Geo. N. Lund Chairman of the Board and President, TheFirst National Bank of Reserve, Reserve,Mont 1958
O. M. Jorgenson Chairman, Security Trust and Savings Bank,Billings, Mont 1959
Appointed by Board of Governors:
Carl McFarland Missoula, Mont 1958John M. Otten Farmer and rancher, Lewistown, Mont 1959
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
146 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.
TermExpires
DIRECTORS—Cont. Dec. 31
District 10—Kansas CityClass A:
W. S. Kennedy President and Chairman of the Board, TheFirst National Bank of Junction City, Junc-tion City, Kans 1958
W. L. Bunten President, Goodland State Bank, Goodland,Kans 1959
Harold Kountze Chairman of the Board, The Colorado Na-tional Bank of Denver, Denver, Colo I960
Class B:E. M. Dodds Chairman of the Board, United States Cold
Storage Corporation, Kansas City, Mo 1958K. S. Adams Chairman of the Board, Phillips Petroleum
Company, Bartlesville, Okla 1959Max A. Miller Livestock rancher, Omaha, Neb I960
Class C:Raymond W. Hall Counsel, Gage, Hillix, Moore & Park, Attor-
neys, Kansas City, Mo 1958Oliver S. Willham President, Oklahoma State University, Still-
water, Okla 1959Joe W. Seacrest President, State Journal Company, Lincoln,
Neb 1960
Denver Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:Ralph S. Newcomer Executive Vice President, First National Bank
in Boulder, Boulder, Colo 1958Arthur Johnson President, First National Bank in Raton, Raton,
N. Mex 1958Stewart Cosgriff President, The Denver National Bank, Denver,
Colo 1959
Appointed by Board of Governors:Ray Reynolds Cattle feeder and farmer, Longmont, Colo 1958Aksel Nielsen President, The Title Guaranty Company, Den-
ver, Colo 1959
Oklahoma City Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:R. Otis McClintock Chairman of the Board, The First National
Bank and Trust Company of Tulsa, Tulsa,Okla 1958
C. L. Priddy President, The National Bank of McAlester,McAlester, Okla 1958
C. P. Stuart President, The Fidelity National Bank & TrustCompany, Oklahoma City, Okla 1959
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 147
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.
TermExpires
DIRECTORS—Cont. Dec. 31
Appointed by Board of Governors:Phil H. Lowery Owner, Lowery Hereford Ranch, Loco, Okla... 1958Davis D. Bovaird President, The Bovaird Supply Company, Tulsa,
Okla 1959
Omaha Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:William N. Mitten Chairman of the Board, First National Bank of
Fremont, Fremont, Neb 1958George J. Forbes Chairman of the Board and President, Bank of
Laramie, Laramie, Wyo 1959C. Wheaton Battey President, The Continental National Bank of
Lincoln, Lincoln, Neb 1959Appointed by Board of Governors:
Manville Kendrick Rancher, Sheridan, Wyo 1958James L. Paxton, Jr President, Paxton-Mitchell Company, Omaha,
Neb 1959
District 11—DallasClass A:
J. Edd McLaughlin President, Security State Bank & Trust Com-pany, Rails, Tex 1958
John M. Griffith President, The City National Bank of Taylor,Taylor, Tex 1959
Sam D. Young President, El Paso National Bank, El Paso, Tex. I960
Class B:J. B. Thomas President and General Manager and Director,
Texas Electric Service Company, Fort Worth,Tex 1958
John R. Alford Industrialist and farmer, Henderson, Tex 1959D. A. Hulcy Chairman of the Board, Lone Star Gas Com-
pany, Dallas, Tex I960Class C:
Lamar Fleming, Jr Chairman of the Board, Anderson, Clayton &Co., Inc., Houston, Tex 1958
Hal Bogle Rancher and feeder, Dexter, N. Mex 1959Robert J. Smith President, Pioneer Hydrotex Industries, Inc.,
Dallas, Tex I960
El Paso Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:Thomas C. Patterson Vice President, El Paso National Bank, El Paso,
Tex 1958F. W. Barton President, The Marfa National Bank, Marfa,
Tex 1959John P. Butler President, The First National Bank of Midland,
Midland, Tex I960Floyd Childress Vice President, The First National Bank of Ros-
well, Roswell, N. Mex I960
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
148 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.
TermExpires
DIRECTORS—Cont. Dec. 31
Appointed by Board of Governors:E. J. Workman President, and Director of Research and Devel-
opment Division, New Mexico Institute ofMining and Technology, Socorro, N. Mex.. . 1958
D. F. Stahmann Chairman of the Board and Treasurer, Stah-mann Farms, Inc., Las Cruces, N. Mex 1959
William R. Mathews Editor and Publisher, The Arizona Daily Star,Tucson, Ariz I960
Houston BranchAppointed by Federal Reserve Bank:
S. Marcus Greer Vice Chairman of the Board, First City Na-tional Bank of Houston, Houston, Tex 1958
I. F. Betts President, The American National Bank ofBeaumont, Beaumont, Tex 1959
W. B. Callan President, The Victoria National Bank, Vic-toria, Tex I960
L. R. Bryan, Jr Vice Chairman of the Board and Chairman ofthe Executive Committee, Bank of the South-west National Association, Houston, Hous-ton, Tex I960
Appointed by Board of Governors:Tyrus R. Timm Head, Department of Agricultural Economics
and Sociology, A. & M. College of Texas,College Station, Tex 1958
A. E. Cudlipp Vice President and Director, Lufkin Foundryand Machine Company, Lufkin, Tex 1959
John C. Flanagan Vice President and General Manager, TexasDistribution Division, United Gas Corpora-tion, Houston, Tex I960
San Antonio Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:Burton Dunn Chairman of the Executive Committee, Corpus
Christi State National Bank, Corpus Christi,Tex 1958
E. C. Breedlove President, The First National Bank of Harlin-gen, Harlingen, Tex 1959
J. W. Beretta President, First National Bank of San Antonio,San Antonio, Tex I960
Donald D. James Vice President, The Austin National Bank, Aus-tin, Tex 1960
Appointed by Board of Governors:Harold Vagtborg President, Southwest Research Institute, San
Antonio, Tex 1958Clarence E. Ayres Professor of Economics, The University of
Texas, Austin, Tex 1959Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 149
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.
TermExpires
DIRECTORS—Cont. Dec.31Alex R. Thomas Vice President, Geo. C. Vaugban & Sons, San
Antonio, Tex I960
District 12—San FranciscoClass A:
John A. Schoonover President, The Idaho First National Bank, Boise,Idaho 1958
M. Vilas Hubbard President and Chairman of the Board, CitizensCommercial Trust and Savings Bank of Pasa-dena, Pasadena, Calif 1959
Carroll F. Byrd Chairman of the Board and President, The FirstNational Bank of Willows, Willows, Calif. I960
Class B:Walter S. Johnson Chairman of the Board, American Forest Prod-
ucts Corporation, San Francisco, Calif 1958N. Loyall McLaren Partner, Haskins & Sells, San Francisco, Calif. 1959Reese H. Taylor Chairman of the Board, Union Oil Company
of California, Los Angeles, Calif I960Class C:
Y. Frank Freeman Vice President, Paramount Pictures Corpora-tion, Hollywood, Calif 1958
A. H. Brawner Chairman of the Board, W. P. Fuller & Co.,San Francisco, Calif 1959
Philip I. Welk Vice President, Centennial Mills, Inc., Port-land, Ore 1960
Los Angeles BranchAppointed by Federal Reserve Bank:
Anderson Borthwick President, The First National Trust and Sav-ings Bank of San Diego, San Diego, Calif... 1958
James E. Shelton Chairman, Security-First National Bank of LosAngeles, Los Angeles, Calif 1958
Joe D. Paxton Chairman of the Board, County National Bankand Trust Company of Santa Barbara, SantaBarbara, Calif 1959
Appointed by Board of Governors:Leonard K. Firestone President, Firestone Tire and Rubber Company
of California, Los Angeles, Calif 1958Robert J. Cannon President, Cannon Electric Company, Los An-
geles, Calif 1959
Portland BranchAppointed by Federal Reserve Bank:
John B. Rogers President, The First National Bank of Baker,Baker, Ore 1958
J. H. McNally President, The First National Bank of BonnersFerry, Bonners Ferry, Idaho 1958
C. B. Stephenson President, The First National Bank of Oregon,Portland, Portland, Ore 1959
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
150 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.
TermExpires
DIRECTORS—Cont. Dec. 31
Appointed by Board of Governors:William H. Steiwer, Sr Livestock and farming, Fossil, Ore 1958Warren W. Braley Partner, Braley and Graham Buick, Portland,
Ore 1959
Salt Lake City Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:Russell S. Hanson Executive Vice President, The First National
Bank of Logan, Logan, Utah 1958George S. Eccles President, First Security Bank of Utah, Na-
tional Association, Salt Lake City, Utah 1958Oscar Hiller President, Butte County Bank, Arco, Idaho 1959
Appointed by Board of Governors:Geo. W. Watkins President, Snake River Equipment Company,
Idaho Falls, Idaho 1958Joseph Rosenblatt President, The Eimco Corporation, Salt Lake
City, Utah 1959
Seattle Branch
Appointed by Federal Reserve Bank:S. B. Lafromboise President, The First National Bank of Enum-
claw, Enumclaw, Wash 1958James Brennan President, First National Bank in Spokane, Spo-
kane, Wash 1958Joshua Green, Jr President, Peoples National Bank of Washing-
ton, Seattle, Wash 1959
Appointed by Board of Governors:Lyman J. Bunting President, Rainier Fruit Company, Yakima,
Wash 1958Henry N. Anderson President, Twin Harbors Lumber Company,
Aberdeen, Wash 1959
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 151
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.PRESIDENTS AND VICE PRESIDENTS
Federal ReserveBank of—
Boston
New York
Philadelphia . . .
Cleveland
Richmond
Atlanta
Chicago
St. Louis
Minneapolis . . .
Kansas City . . . .
Dallas
San Francisco . .
PresidentFirst Vice President
J. A. EricksonE. O. Latham
Alfred HayesWilliam F. Treiber
Karl R. BoppRobert N. Hilkert
W. D. FultonDonald S. Thompson
Hugh LeachEdw. A. Wayne
Malcolm BryanLewis M. Clark
Carl E. AllenE. C. Harris
Delos C. JohnsGuy S. Freutel
Frederick L. DemingA. W. Mills
H. G. LeedyHenry O. Koppang
Watrous H. IronsW. D. Gentry
H. N. MangelsEliot J. Swan
Vice Presidents
D. H. AngneyAnsgar R. BergeGeorge H. EllisH. A. BilbyJohn ExterM. A. HarrisH. H. KimballH. V. RoelseRobert V. RoosaJoseph R. CampbellW. M. CatanachDavid P. Eastburn
Benjamin F. GrootDana D. SawyerO. A. SchlaikjerRobert G. RouseWalter H.Rozell J r .T. G. TieboutV. WillisR. B. Wiltse
P. M. PoormanJ. V. VergariRichard G. Wilgus
Murdoch K. GoodwinDwight L. AllenRoger R. ClouseC. HarrellL. Merle HostetlerN. L. ArmisteadJ. Dewey DaaneAubrey N. HeflinUpton S. MartinJ. E. DenmarkJohn L. Liles, Jr.J. E. McCorveyHarold T. PattersonNeil B. DawesW. R. DiercksA. M. GustavsonH. J. HelmerPaul C. HodgeHomer JonesGeo. E. KronerDale M. LewisC. W. GrothM. B. HolmgrenA. W. JohnsonJohn T. BoysenGeorge H. ClayJoseph S. HandfordT. A. HardinG. R. MurffT. W. PlantL. G. PondromA. B. MerrittE. R. MillardR. H. Morrill
Martin MorrisonH. E. J. SmithPaul C. Stetzelberget
J. M. NowlanJames M. SlayThomas I. StorrsC. B. StrathyL. B. RaistyEarle L. RauberS. P. Schuessler
C. T. LaiblyGeorge W. MitchellH. J. NewmanA. L. Olson
H. H. WeigelJ. C. Wotawa
H. G. McConnellM. H. Strothman, Jr.
E. U. ShermanClarence W. TowD. W. WoolleyMorgan H. RiceHarry A. Shuf ordC. E. Walker
John A. O'KaneO. P. Wheeler
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
152 ANNUAL REPORT OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES, Dec. 31, 1958—Cont.
VICE PRESIDENTS IN CHARGE OP BRANCHES
Federal Reserve Bank of— Chief Officer
New York . .Cleveland . .
Richmond . .
Atlanta
Chicago . . . .St. Louis . . .
Minneapolis .Kansas City .
Dallas
San Francisco
BuffaloCincinnatiPittsburghBaltimoreCharlotteBirminghamJacksonvilleNashvilleNew OrleansDetroitLittle RockLouisvilleMemphisHelenaDenverOklahoma CityOmahaEl PasoHoustonSan AntonioLos AngelesPortlandSalt Lake CitySeattle
I. B. SmithR. G. JohnsonJ. W. KossinD. F. HagnerR. L. CherryH. C. FrazerT. A. LanfordR. E. Moody, Jr.M. L. ShawR. A. SwaneyFred BurtonDonald L. HenryDarryl R. FrancisKyle K. FossumCecil PuckettR. L. MathesP. A. DebusHoward CarrithersJ. L. CookW. E. EagleW. F. VolbergJ. A. RandallE. R. BarglebaughJ. M. Leisner
CONFERENCE OF PRESIDENTS
The Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks are organized into a Conference ofPresidents which meets from time to time to consider matters of common interestand to consult with and advise the Board of Governors.
Mr. Leedy, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, and Mr. Erickson,President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, who were elected Chairman of theConference and Vice Chairman, respectively, in January 1956, were re-elected as suchin March 1957 and continued to serve until the meeting in February 1958. At thismeeting Mr. Erickson was elected Chairman of the Conference and Mr. Johns, Presi-dent of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, was elected Vice Chairman.
Mr. John T. Boysen, Vice President and Cashier of the Federal Reserve Bank ofKansas City, served as Secretary of the Conference from May 1956 to February 1958.Mr. Loring C. Nye, Assistant Cashier of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, wasappointed as Secretary of the Conference at the meeting in February 1958.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
BOUNDARIES OF FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS
AND THEIR BRANCH TERRITORIES
= = BOUNDARIES OF FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS
BOUNDARIES OF FEDERAL RESERVE BRANCH TERRITORIES
^ BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
® FEDERAL RESERVE BANK CITIES
• FEDERAL RESERVE BRANCH CITIES
NOTE.—For a description of the Federal Reserve districts and branch territories, see the Annual Report of the Board ofGovernors for 1953, pp. 124-34; for later changes in branch territory lines, see p. 57 of the 1954 Annual Report.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Page
Acceptance powers granted member banks 91Acceptances, bankers':
Federal Reserve Bank holdings 99, 106, 108, 110Open market transactions during 1958 129
Alaska Statehood Act:Actions by Board of Governors incident to 87Federal Reserve districts, readjustment to include Alaska 87, 94National banks, membership in Federal Reserve System 94
Assets and liabilities:Banks, by classes 125Board of Governors 102Federal Reserve Banks 106-111
Balance of international payments 13Bank credit, supplies of 25, 27Bank holding companies 90Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, report to Congress under 95Bank premises, Federal Reserve Banks
and branches 100, 106, 108, 110, 120Bank supervision by Federal Reserve System 89Banking offices:
Changes in number 127On, and not on, Par List, number 128
Board of Governors:Accounts audited 101Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, report to Congress under. . . . 95Income and expenses 101-103Members and officers 132Policy actions 72-88Regulations (See Regulations)
Branch banks:Domestic, changes in number 127Federal Reserve (See Federal Reserve Banks)Foreign 92
Business finance 21Capital accounts:
Banks, by classes 125Federal Reserve Banks 107, 109, 111
Chairmen of Federal Reserve Banks 135Charts:
Bank loans and investments 25Deposits of commercial banks 28Economic indicators, selected 2Gross national product 5Interest rates 20Reserves and borrowings, member banks 9U. S. balance of payments 12
Commercial banks:Assets and liabilities 125Banking offices, changes in number 127
154Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
INDEX 155
Page
Commercial banks—ContinuedDeposits 28, 125Loans and investments 27, 125Number, by classes 125
Condition statement of Federal Reserve Banks 106-111Consumer finance 22, 26Credit demands and supplies 18, 25Defense Production Act of 1950, amendment of 94Defense production loans 95, 124Deposits:
Banks, by classes 125Commercial banks 28, 125Federal Reserve Banks 107, 109, 111, 118Savings and other time deposits, maximum rates 123
Deputy Chairmen of Federal Reserve Banks 135Directors, Federal Reserve Banks and branches 136Discount rates at Federal Reserve Banks:
Increases in 9, 82, 85Reductions in 3, 73, 76, 80Table of 122
Discounts and advances by FederalReserve Banks 99, 106, 108, 110, 113, 114, 118
Dividends:Federal Reserve Banks 97, 98, 115, 116Member banks 126
Dollar exchange, permission granted member bank to acceptdrafts or bills drawn for purpose of furnishing 92
Earnings:Federal Reserve Banks 97, 114, 116Member banks 126
Economic review 1-11Examinations:
Federal Reserve Banks 89Foreign banking and financing corporations 93Holding company affiliates 91Member banks 89State member banks and foreign branches 89, 93
Expenses:Board of Governors 101-103Federal Reserve Banks 97, 114, 116Member banks 126
Federal Advisory Council:Meetings 134Members and officers 134
Federal Open Market Committee:Meetings 34, 133Members and officers 133Policy actions 32-71Review of continuing authorities or statements of policy 39Special actions incident to disorderly market in Government
securities 7, 53Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
156 INDEX
Page
Federal Reserve Act:Section 2, amendment relating to readjustment of Federal
Reserve districts to include Alaska 94Section 13b, repeal of, and return of surplus to Treasury 95, 98Section I4(b), amendment extending authority of Federal Re-
serve Banks to purchase and sell Government obligationsdirectly from or to the U. S 94
Section 24, amendment relating to national bank loans partici-pated in by Small Business Administration 94
Federal Reserve Banks:Assessments for expenses of Board of Governors 103, 114Authority to purchase and sell Government obligations directly
from or to the U. S., extension of 94Bank premises 100, 106, 108, 110, 120Branches:
Bank premises 100, 120Directors 136Vice Presidents in charge of 152
Capital accounts 107, 109, 111Chairmen and Deputy Chairmen 135Condition statement 106-111Directors 136Discount rates:
Increases in 9, 82, 85Reductions in 3, 73, 76, 80Table of 122
Dividends 97, 98, 115, 116Earnings and expenses 97, 114, 116Examination of 89Foreign and international accounts 99Officers and employees, number and salaries 114, 121Presidents and other officers 151Profit and loss 115Section 13b loan authority, repeal of, and return of surplus
to Treasury 95, 98Special certificates purchased direct from Treasury, holdings of. . . . 113U. S. Government securities:
Holdings of 98, 106, 108, 110, 112, 113, 118Open market transactions during 1958 129
Volume of operations 96, 113Federal Reserve districts:
Readjustment to include Alaska 87, 94Twelfth District, readjustment to include Alaska in territory of
Seattle Branch 87Federal Reserve notes:
Condition statement data 106-111Cost of printing, issue, and redemption 103Interest paid to Treasury 97, 98, 115, 116
Federal Reserve policy:Actions to combat recession 3Digest of principal policy actions 30
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
INDEX 157
Page
Federal Reserve policy—ContinuedGold movements and Federal Reserve policy 16Record of policy actions:
Board of Governors 72-88Federal Open Market Committee 32-71
Federal Reserve System:Bank supervision by 89Map of 153Membership:
Changes in 90National banks in Alaska 94
Foreign banking and financing corporations:Examination of 93Operations of 92Titles of foreign financing corporations, amendment of
Regulation K 86Foreign branches 92Gold certificate reserves of Federal Reserve Banks 106, 108, 110Gold movements in 1958, relation to balance of international
payments and U. S. monetary system 11Government finance 18Government securities (See U. S. Government securities)Holding company affiliates 91Industrial loans by Federal Reserve Banks:
Condition statement data 106, 108, 110Earnings on 99, 114Rates on 122Section 13b loan authority, repeal of, and return of
surplus to Treasury 95, 98Insured commercial banks 125, 127Inter-Agency Bank Examination School 93Interest rates:
Discount rates at Federal Reserve Banks:Increases in 9, 82, 85Reductions in 3, 73, 76, 80Table of 122
Federal Reserve rates, table of 122Regulation V loans 124Savings and other time deposits, maximum rates 123
International capital transactions 24Investments (See also specific types of investments) :
Banks, by classes 125Commercial banks 27, 125Federal Reserve Banks 106, 108, 110Member banks 125
Legislation:Alaska Statehood Act 94Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, report to Congress under . . . . 95Defense Production Act of 1950, amendment of 94
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
158 INDEX
Page
Legislation—ContinuedFederal Reserve Act:
Section 2, amendment relating to readjustment of FederalReserve districts to include Alaska 94
Section 13b, repeal of 95Section 14(b), amendment extending authority of Federal
Reserve Banks to purchase and sell Government obliga-tions directly from or to the U. S 94
Section 24, amendment relating to national bank real estateloans participated in by Small Business Administration 94
Small Business Investment Act of 1958. 95, 98Loans (See also specific types of loans) :
Banks, by classes 125Commercial banks 27, 125Federal Reserve Banks 98, 106, 108, 110, 118, 122Member banks 125National bank real estate loans participated in by Small Business
Administration, amendment of Section 24 of Federal Re-serve Act 94
Margin requirements:Increases in 10, 81, 83Reduction in 10, 72Table of 124
Meetings:Chairmen of Federal Reserve Banks 135Federal Advisory Council 134Federal Open Market Committee 34, 133Presidents of Federal Reserve Banks 152
Member banks:Acceptance powers 91Assets, liabilities, and capital accounts 125Banking offices, changes in number 127Earnings, expenses, and dividends 126Examination of 89Foreign branches, number in operation 92Number 90, 125Reserve requirements:
Reductions in 3, 75, 78Table of 123
Reserves and related items 118Membership in Federal Reserve System:
Changes in 90National banks in Alaska 94
Mutual savings banks 125, 127National banks:
Alaskan banks, membership in Federal Reserve System 9AAssets and liabilities 125Banking offices, changes in number 127Foreign branches, number in operation 92Number 90, 125
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
INDEX 159
Page
National banks—ContinuedReal estate loans participated in by Small Business Administra-
tion, amendment of Section 24 of Federal Reserve Act 94Trust powers 91
Nonmember banks 125, 127, 128Open Market operations 32-71, 129Par List, banking offices on, and not on, number 128Policy actions, Board of Governors:
Alaskan Statehood, actions incident to 87Discount rates at Federal Reserve Banks:
Increases in 82, 85Reductions in 73, 76, 80
Margin requirements:Increases in 81, 83Reduction in 72
Regulation K, Corporations Doing Foreign Banking or OtherForeign Financing under the Federal Reserve Act, amend-ment of Sections 3(b) and 10(c) (2) 86
Reserve requirements of member banks, reductions in 75, 78Policy actions, Federal Open Market Committee:
Authority to effect transactions in System Account 32-71Review of continuing authorities or statements of policy 39Special actions incident to disorderly market in
Government securities 53Presidents of Federal Reserve Banks:
Conference of 152List of 151Meetings 152Salaries 121
Real estate loans:National bank loans participated in by Small Business Adminis-
tration, amendment of Section 24 of Federal Reserve Act . . . . 94Recession and recovery 1Regulations, Board of Governors:
Amendments incident to admission of Alaska to Statehood 87D, Reserves of Member Banks:
Reserve requirements, reductions in 3, 75, 78K, Corporations Doing Foreign Banking or Other Foreign
Financing under the Federal Reserve Act:Amendment of Sections 3(b) and 10(c) (2) 86
T, Extension and Maintenance of Credit by Brokers, Dealers,and Members of National Securities Exchanges:Margin requirements:
Increases in 10, 81, 83Reduction in 10, 72
U, Loans by Banks for the Purpose of Purchasing or CarryingStocks Registered on a National Securities Exchange:Margin requirements:
Increases in 10, 81, 83Reduction in 10, 72
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
160 INDEX
Page
Regulations, Board of Governors—ContinuedV, Loan Guarantees for Defense Production 95, 124
Repurchase agreements:Bankers' acceptances 106, 108, 110, 129U. S. Government securities 106, 108, 110, 118, 129
Reserve requirements, member banks:Reductions in 3, 75, 78Table of 123
Reserves:Federal Reserve Banks 106-111Member banks 118
Salaries:Board of Governors 103Federal Reserve Banks 114, 121
Savings 26Savings deposits (See Deposits)Small Business Administration:
Real estate loans participated in by, amendment of Section 24of Federal Reserve Act 94
Small business financing study 103Small Business Investment Act of 1958 95, 98State member banks:
Assets and liabilities 125Banking offices, changes in number 127Examination of, and foreign branches 89, 93Foreign branches, number in operation 92Number 90, 125
System Open Market Account:Audit of 89Authority to effect transactions in 32-71
Territory of Federal Reserve Banks and branches:Seattle Branch territory, inclusion of Alaska in 87
Time deposits (See Deposits)Treasury finance 18Trust powers of national banks 91U. S. Government securities:
Authority of Federal Reserve Banks to purchase and selldirectly from or to the U. S., extension of 94
Bank holdings, by class of bank 125Commercial bank holdings 28, 125Federal Reserve Bank holdings 98, 106, 108, 110, 112, 113, 118Open market operations 32-71, 129Special certificates purchased direct from Treasury 113
V-loans 95, 124Voting permits issued to holding company affiliates 91
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis