FORMULATION OF A SELF-EMULSIFYING DRUG ......FORMULATION OF A SELF-EMULSIFYING DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM...

1
FORMULATION OF A SELF-EMULSIFYING DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM OF FENOFIBRATE Courtney McCorkle and Bradley Clark, High Point University Fred Wilson School of Pharmacy High Point University, High Point NC IntroducLon Present-day therapeuLcs are oNen characterized by very poor aqueous solubility which is the driving force for drug absorpLon from the gut. Research is currently being conducted to develop methods to increase the absorpLon of these poorly soluble drugs, including the use of lipid formulaLons and self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS). Self-emulsifying formulaLons have the potenLal to improve drug absorpLon by forming droplets with high surface area from which solubilized drug can be released. Fenofibrate is a drug used to treat dyslipidemia. It has very low aqueous solubility which limits its oral bioavailability. It was chosen as a model drug from a number of potenLal compounds based on the improved absorpLon projected with increased solubility using absorpLon simulaLon soNware GastroPlus™ (SimulaLonsPlus, Lancaster, CA, See Figure 1). By creaLng a SEDDS formulaLon of fenofibrate, it is hoped that enhanced release from the dosage form can be achieved, thereby increasing rate and/or extent of drug absorpLon. Methods Various lipids, surfactants, co-solvents, and co-surfactants were screened for their ability to solubilize fenofibrate in a drug-sparing semiqualitaLve solubility procedure. COMPOUND-SPARING SOLUBILITY TESTING FLOW CHART The miscibility of these solvents was also tested by adding 5-10 drops of each into water and visually analyzing the result. Based on the results of the solubility and miscibility tesLng, emulsion technology theory (HLB), and ease of emulsion formaLon, formulaLons where chosen. These formulaLons were then analyzed for emulsion droplet size, drug release in aqueous dissoluLon media, and drug stability. The ability of a formulaLon to form an emulsion with li^le or no agitaLon was assessed by placing 0.5 mL of the respecLve formulaLon into 5 mL of DI water in a test tube and modestly agitaLng. This method was also used to prepare droplets for photomicrography. Images of emulsion droplets were captured using an EVOS FL cell imaging microscope and camera (Thermofisher ScienLfic) at 40X magnificaLon and analyzed using ImageJ image analysis soNware. Results QualitaLve solubility results are presented in Figure 2, showing the poor aqueous solubility of fenofibrate. This was confirmed with UV spectrophotometry, which gave an esLmate of 0.1 µg/mL. This is in agreement with literature 1 . Oils and solvents having a more lipophilic or amphiphilic solubilizaLon profile showed superior solvent capacity. Miscibility determinaLons among formulaLon components showed that Brij 30, Polysorbate 80, PEG 400, TriaceLn, and PEG-40-Castor Oil were all miscible with water, methanol, and acetonitrile. Corn oil, however, was miscible with none of these solvents. Conclusions Fenofibrate was successfully formulated as self 1. -emulsifying drug delivery systems that can potenLally be used in in-vivo evaluaLons of enhanced bioavailability. IniLal drug loading of the 3 SEDDs formulaLons developed was low 2. (3%) and needs to conLnue to be evaluated to achieve higher possible doses (e.g. ≥10%). All three formulaLons resulted in oil 3. -in-water emulsions that had average droplet diameters of greater than 1 μm, and addiLonal formulaLon work with alternaLve solvents and surfactants will need to be pursued to achieve emulsion droplet sizes in the 100s of nm or lower. Fenofibrate 4. release from SEDDs into a water dissoluLon medium was very poor, and needed to be enhanced with the use of a surfactant (SLS). Based on solubility and miscibility results, the following three formulaLons were developed based on each component’s hydrophile- lipophile balance (HLB) and concentraLons 2 : FormaLon of emulsions with each of the three SEDDs formulaLons required li^le or no agitaLon. Droplet sizes for each of the formulaLons ranged from approximately 1 to 50 micron and were similar with all three lipid formulaLons. Differences in the impact of lipid formulaLon: water raLo in the range of 1:1 to 1:15 were evaluated and shown to have li^le impact on emulsion droplet size. DissoluLon profiles of size 0 hard gelaLn capsules filled with 0.5 g were generated, and an example can be seen in Figure 5. The extent of dissoluLon was much be^er in 0.5% SLS as was expected because of fenofibrate’s poor aqueous solubility. It appears that the 0.5% SLS dissoluLon medium solubilized a significant porLon of the capsule contents in addiLon to drug, as when the dissoluLon cooled from 37⁰C to room temperature a noLceable precipitate formed in the dissoluLon vials, necessitaLng the sample chamber of the HPLC autosampler and the column to be adjusted to 37⁰C. Fig 1 GastroPlus graph showing predicted percent absorbed vs ranges of solubility, permeability, dose, and parLcle size Fig 2 SemiquanLtaLve solubility of fenofibrate in mulLple solvents using a compound-sparing procedure Fig 3 Light micrograph of emulsion droplets (FormulaLon C); the reference line corresponds to 100 µm Fig 4 Chromatogram of Fenofibrate soluLon (5 µ/mL); chromatographic condiLons were 80:20 ACN/H 2 O @ 1 mL/min with a C-18 column, λ = 286 nm detecLon Fenofibrate (mw 360.8) References Jamzad 1. and Fassihi, AAPS PharmSciTech, 2006; 7(2) ArLcle 33 “The HLB SYSTEM a Lme 2. -saving guide to emulsifier selecLon”, published by ICI Americas Inc., 1976. 1 10 100 1000 Water Ethanol Propylene Glycol PEG 40 Castor Oil Olive Oil Sesame Oil Corn Oil Polysorbate 80 Captex 355 Tween 20 Carbowax PEG… Brij 30 Triacetin Capmul PG-8 mg/mL Fenofibrate SemiquanLtaLve Solubility Solubility less than Solubility greater than Fig 5 DissoluLon of fenofibrate formulaLon A in water (blue curve) and 0.5% SLS (orange curve); temperature = 37⁰C, paddle speed = 75 rpm, assay by HPLC, N= 2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 % of label released Lme, min Fenofibrate 15 mg SEDDS Capsule DissoluLon 10 mg Fenofibrate Tumble 30 min 10 mL solvent Clear SoluLon? Saturated Suspension? “Solubility less than” “Solubility greater than” add addiLonal drug than” Drug release was evaluated using a Vankel DissoluLon Apparatus in a USP Type II (paddle) configuraLon. A 500 mg hard gelaLn capsule of fenofibrate lipid formulaLon (3% w/w, represenLng 15 mg of drug) was placed into the dissoluLon bath and allowed to emulsify. Each vessel was sampled at 10, 20, 30, and 45 minutes using an isocraLc HPLC method. UV spectrophotometry was used to esLmate the solubility of fenofibrate in water at 25°C.

Transcript of FORMULATION OF A SELF-EMULSIFYING DRUG ......FORMULATION OF A SELF-EMULSIFYING DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM...

Page 1: FORMULATION OF A SELF-EMULSIFYING DRUG ......FORMULATION OF A SELF-EMULSIFYING DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM OF FENOFIBRATE Courtney McCorkle and Bradley Clark, High Point University Fred Wilson

FORMULATION OF A SELF-EMULSIFYING DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM OF FENOFIBRATECourtney McCorkle and Bradley Clark, High Point University Fred Wilson School of Pharmacy

High Point University, High Point NC

IntroducLon Present-day therapeuLcs are oNen characterized by very poor aqueous solubility which

is the driving force for drug absorpLon from the gut. Research is currently being

conducted to develop methods to increase the absorpLon of these poorly soluble

drugs, including the use of lipid formulaLons and self-emulsifying drug delivery systems

(SEDDS). Self-emulsifying formulaLons have the potenLal to improve drug absorpLon

by forming droplets with high surface area from which solubilized drug can be

released.

Fenofibrate is a drug used to treat dyslipidemia. It has very low aqueous solubility

which limits its oral bioavailability. It was chosen as a model drug from a number of

potenLal compounds based on the improved absorpLon projected with increased

solubility using absorpLon simulaLon soNware GastroPlus™ (SimulaLonsPlus,

Lancaster, CA, See Figure 1). By creaLng a SEDDS formulaLon of fenofibrate, it is hoped

that enhanced release from the dosage form can be achieved, thereby increasing rate

and/or extent of drug absorpLon.

Methods Various lipids, surfactants, co-solvents, and co-surfactants were screened for their

ability to solubilize fenofibrate in a drug-sparing semiqualitaLve solubility procedure.

COMPOUND-SPARING SOLUBILITY TESTING FLOW CHART

The miscibility of these solvents was also tested by adding 5-10 drops of each into

water and visually analyzing the result.

Based on the results of the solubility and miscibility tesLng, emulsion technology

theory (HLB), and ease of emulsion formaLon, formulaLons where chosen. These

formulaLons were then analyzed for emulsion droplet size, drug release in aqueous

dissoluLon media, and drug stability.

The ability of a formulaLon to form an emulsion with li^le or no agitaLon was

assessed by placing 0.5 mL of the respecLve formulaLon into 5 mL of DI water in a

test tube and modestly agitaLng. This method was also used to prepare droplets for

photomicrography.

Images of emulsion droplets were captured using an EVOS FL cell imaging microscope

and camera (Thermofisher ScienLfic) at 40X magnificaLon and analyzed using ImageJ

image analysis soNware.

ResultsQualitaLve solubility results are presented in Figure 2, showing the poor aqueous solubility of

fenofibrate. This was confirmed with UV spectrophotometry, which gave an esLmate of 0.1

µg/mL. This is in agreement with literature1. Oils and solvents having a more lipophilic or

amphiphilic solubilizaLon profile showed superior solvent capacity.

Miscibility determinaLons among formulaLon components showed that Brij 30, Polysorbate 80,

PEG 400, TriaceLn, and PEG-40-Castor Oil were all miscible with water, methanol, and acetonitrile.

Corn oil, however, was miscible with none of these solvents.

ConclusionsFenofibrate was successfully formulated as self1. -emulsifying drug

delivery systems that can potenLally be used in in-vivo evaluaLons of

enhanced bioavailability.

IniLal drug loading of the 3 SEDDs formulaLons developed was low 2.

(3%) and needs to conLnue to be evaluated to achieve higher possible

doses (e.g. ≥10%).

All three formulaLons resulted in oil3. -in-water emulsions that had

average droplet diameters of greater than 1 μm, and addiLonal

formulaLon work with alternaLve solvents and surfactants will need to

be pursued to achieve emulsion droplet sizes in the 100s of nm or

lower.

Fenofibrate4. release from SEDDs into a water dissoluLon medium was

very poor, and needed to be enhanced with the use of a surfactant

(SLS).

Based on solubility and miscibility results, the following three

formulaLons were developed based on each component’s hydrophile-

lipophile balance (HLB) and concentraLons2:

FormaLon of emulsions with each of the three SEDDs formulaLons

required li^le or no agitaLon. Droplet sizes for each of the

formulaLons ranged from approximately 1 to 50 micron and were

similar with all three lipid formulaLons.

Differences in the impact of lipid formulaLon: water raLo in the range

of 1:1 to 1:15 were evaluated and shown to have li^le impact on

emulsion droplet size.

DissoluLon profiles of size 0 hard gelaLn capsules filled with 0.5 g were

generated, and an example can be seen in Figure 5. The extent of

dissoluLon was much be^er in 0.5% SLS as was expected because of

fenofibrate’s poor aqueous solubility.

It appears that the 0.5% SLS dissoluLon medium solubilized a significant

porLon of the capsule contents in addiLon to drug, as when the

dissoluLon cooled from 37⁰C to room temperature a noLceable

precipitate formed in the dissoluLon vials, necessitaLng the sample

chamber of the HPLC autosampler and the column to be adjusted to

37⁰C.

Fig 1 GastroPlus graph showing predicted percent absorbed vs

ranges of solubility, permeability, dose, and parLcle size

Fig 2 SemiquanLtaLve solubility of fenofibrate in mulLple

solvents using a compound-sparing procedure

Fig 3 Light micrograph of emulsion droplets (FormulaLon C);

the reference line corresponds to 100 µm

Fig 4 Chromatogram of Fenofibrate soluLon (5 µ/mL);

chromatographic condiLons were 80:20 ACN/H2O @ 1 mL/min

with a C-18 column, λ = 286 nm detecLon

Fenofibrate (mw 360.8)

ReferencesJamzad1. and Fassihi, AAPS PharmSciTech, 2006; 7(2) ArLcle 33

“The HLB SYSTEM a Lme2. -saving guide to emulsifier selecLon”, published

by ICI Americas Inc., 1976.

1

10

100

1000

Wat

er

Ethan

ol

Propyl

ene G

lycol

PEG 40 C

asto

r Oil

Olive O

il

Sesa

me O

il

Corn O

il

Polyso

rbat

e 80

Capte

x 355

Tween

20

Carbow

ax P

EG…

Brij 3

0

Tria

cetin

Capm

ul PG-8

mg

/mL

Fenofibrate SemiquanLtaLve Solubility

Solubility less than

Solubility greater than

Fig 5 DissoluLon of fenofibrate formulaLon A in water (blue

curve) and 0.5% SLS (orange curve); temperature = 37⁰C,

paddle speed = 75 rpm, assay by HPLC, N= 2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

% o

f la

be

l re

lea

sed

Lme, min

Fenofibrate 15 mg SEDDS Capsule DissoluLon

10 mg

Fenofibrate

Tumble

30 min10 mL

solvent

Clear SoluLon?

Saturated Suspension? “Solubility less than”

“Solubility

greater than”

add addiLonal drug

than”

Drug release was evaluated using a Vankel DissoluLon Apparatus in a USP Type II (paddle) configuraLon. A 500

mg hard gelaLn capsule of fenofibrate lipid formulaLon (3% w/w, represenLng 15 mg of drug) was placed into

the dissoluLon bath and allowed to emulsify. Each vessel was sampled at 10, 20, 30, and 45 minutes using an

isocraLc HPLC method.

UV spectrophotometry was used to esLmate the solubility of fenofibrate in water at 25°C.