FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

15
FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321 Spring 2005 Lab 2 _______ GR Sections 503, 504 Dr. James Russell Lab: Kalwant Singh Sections 501, 502 Dr. David Schechter Lab: Charles Ozobeme

description

FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321. Lab 2 _______ GR. Spring 2005. Sections 501, 502 Dr. David Schechter Lab: Charles Ozobeme. Sections 503, 504 Dr. James Russell Lab: Kalwant Singh. Lab 3 objectives. More information about GR Calculation of Vsh Geographix – PRIZM tutorial. Gamma Ray Log. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Page 1: FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

FORMATION EVALUATIONPETE 321

Spring 2005

Lab 2_______

GR

Sections 503, 504Dr. James RussellLab: Kalwant Singh

Sections 501, 502Dr. David SchechterLab: Charles Ozobeme

Page 2: FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Lab 3 objectives

o More information about GRo Calculation of Vsho Geographix – PRIZM tutorial

Page 3: FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Gamma Ray Log

• Natural gamma-ray log is based on the measurement of natural radioactivity of formation rocks, which depends on the content of radioactive isotopes of uranium, potassium and thorium and, also, on the lithological composition of formation rocks.

• Types:– Natural– Spectral

• Thorium, Uranium, Potassium

• Applications:– Correlation.– Lithology indicator– Determining the shale content of rocks.– Introducing depth corrections to other well logs. – Detection of radioactive minerals.– Paleoenvironmental indicator

Page 4: FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Gamma Ray Log Interpretation

The interpretation of gamma ray logs can be summarized as follows:

• Clean sands, sandstones, limestones, and dolomites have low radioactivity. Anhydrite, salt, lignite and coal have also a low radioactivity.

• Ordinary shales have a much higher radioactivity than the rocks listed above. Shales are sufficiently high in radioactivity and can generally be easily distinguished from the other rocks on a gamma ray log.

Page 5: FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Gamma Ray Log

Figure: Scintillation Gamma Ray Detector

Page 6: FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Gamma Ray Log

Page 7: FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Gamma Ray Log

Sand

Shale

Shale

Gr min

Gr max

Page 8: FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Spectral Gamma Ray Log

•It is a borehole log indicating the concentration of thorium (Th), uranium (U), and  potassium (K) in the rocks surrounding a borehole.

Applications:

•Estimate volume and type of clay minerals•Identify fractures•Differentiate radioactive carbonates from shales and clays

Page 9: FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Spectral Gamma Ray

Page 10: FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Spectral Gamma Ray Log Vs Gamma Ray Log

•It is not able to discern between the gamma-rays from Th, U, and K respectively; it just "counts" the total number of gamma-rays that hits the detector per second.

•The "output" is counts per second (cps) that also may be converted to API units for gamma radiation.

•It is able to detect and identify the radioactive source (gamma-rays from Th, U, and K respectively.)

•It is displayed as three curves from all sources of thorium, uranium and potassium.

Spectral Gamma Ray Log Gamma Ray Log

Page 11: FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Gamma Ray Log

Page 12: FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Gamma Ray Log

Page 13: FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Gamma Ray Log

Page 14: FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Shale Content from GR Log

Page 15: FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Shale Content from GR Log

MINMAX

MINSH GRGR

GRGRI