Formation Code or Reservoir Name - LMKR · IHS provides production data by both Formation Code and...
Transcript of Formation Code or Reservoir Name - LMKR · IHS provides production data by both Formation Code and...
FORMATION CODE OR RESERVOIR NAME?
Production by Formation Code or Reservoir Name? Author: Larry J. Rairden, Nova Geoscience - January 13, 2012
IHS provides production data by both Formation Code and Reservoir Name.
Either format can be imported into GeoGraphix projects. In regional projects,
production by Formation Code (default option) is commonly preferred. In the case of
individual field studies, however, it is often useful to load production by Reservoir
Name. In any case, the two formats must not be commingled within a single
GeoGraphix project.
Regional studies must be able to aggregate productive formations or zones
across an extensive area, while studies at the field-level must identify and segregate
individual units of a productive formation. The examples below review production in
Hidalgo County, Texas, and in particular, a recent discovery on the flank of McAllen
Ranch Field.
McAllen Ranch Field has produced over 1 TCF gas since its discovery in 1960.
Production is from Vicksburg (Oligocene) sands ranging in depth from 9,200 to nearly
16,000 feet. In the 1980's, an 800-acre extension of this field was discovered in an area
surrounded by dry holes and marginal wells. The particular Vicksburg unit composing
this 150 BCFG discovery was identified by the operator as the Guerra sand.
Production by Formation Code
In the first example, a new project is set up and well data is imported for all of
Hidalgo County via the IHS 298 Production Import wizard. In the second screen of this
wizard, the import file is specified and default options are selected (Figure 1). By
default, production is loaded by Formation Code.
FORMATION CODE OR RESERVOIR NAME?
Figure 1: IHS 298 Production Wizard default is Formation Code
In this example, the Guerra 47 (42215322890000) contains production from only
one formation, with Zone Alias VKBG, though there are several sets of perfs. Production
and perfs can be summarized by the Well Summary Tool (Figure 2).
FORMATION CODE OR RESERVOIR NAME?
Figure 2: Well Summary (Well ID 42215322890000) showing four sets of perfs and production from the
VKBG zones.
FORMATION CODE OR RESERVOIR NAME?
In WellBase, monthly production for this well is viewed on the "Production" tabbed
page (Figure 3). Cumulative production is displayed as 5.7 BCFG and 86 MBO.
Figure 3: WellBase showing production tabbed page for Well ID 42215322890000.
Production by Formation Code facilitates regional mapping. In this example, the
primary producing formations of Hidalgo County, the Frio and Vicksburg, can be easily
differentiated by bubble maps (Figures 4 and 5).
FORMATION CODE OR RESERVOIR NAME?
Figure 4: Bubble map of VKBG production in Hidalgo County, TX.
FORMATION CODE OR RESERVOIR NAME?
Figure 5: Bubble map of FRIO production in Hidalgo County, TX.
FORMATION CODE OR RESERVOIR NAME?
Production by Reservoir Name
In the second workflow example, a new project is set up and well data is
imported via the IHS 298 Production Import wizard. In this case, the import option "Use
Reservoir Name instead of Formation Code" is selected in the second screen of this
wizard (Figure 6).
FORMATION CODE OR RESERVOIR NAME?
Figure 6: IHS 298 Production Wizard with Reservoir Name selected
In this example, the Guerra 47 has production from two intervals with Zone
Alias's GUERRA and VICKSBURG Y EAST. These can be summarized by the Well Summary
Tool (Figure 7).
Figure 7: Well Summary (Well ID 42215322890000) showing perfs and production from the VICKSBURG Y
EAST and GUERRA zones.
FORMATION CODE OR RESERVOIR NAME?
In WellBase, monthly production for this well is viewed on the "Production"
tabbed page (Figure 8). Cumulative production is again shown as 5.7 BCFG and 86 MBO.
Figure 8: WellBase view of Well ID 42215322890000 showing first 18-months production.
Reservoir names generally come from regulatory filings submitted by operators.
These reservoir names may be specific to the operator, the producing field, or perhaps
the fault block containing the well. As such, reservoir names can change from field to
field, from operator to operator, or from fault block to fault block. In this example, the
GUERRA and VICKSBURG Y EAST reservoirs are local names for separate reservoirs
within the Vicksburg. As such, GUERRA production (Figure 9) can easily be segregated
from the total Vicksburg production for mapping and analysis (Figure 10).
FORMATION CODE OR RESERVOIR NAME?
Figure 9: Bubble map of Guerra (Vicksburg) production in SE McAllen Ranch AOI, Hidalgo County, TX.
FORMATION CODE OR RESERVOIR NAME?
Figure 10: Bubble map of VKBG production in SE McAllen Ranch AOI, Hidalgo County, TX.
FORMATION CODE OR RESERVOIR NAME?
The Problem with Commingling Formation Code and Reservoir Name
Care must be taken to avoid importing production by Reservoir Name into a
project that already contains production by Formation Code, and vice versa. WellBase is
designed to handle dual completions and dual production streams, so it will interpret
the alternate production format of a single completion as a second production stream
for that well. In other words, wells with single completions will appear to have dual
production streams when production by Formation Code and production by Reservoir
Name are commingled.
For demonstration purposes, the IHS 298 data is again imported into the second
project example, but this time with the default setting of production by Formation Code.
In the case of the Guerra 47, VKBG, GUERRA, and VICKSBURG Y EAST are interpreted as
concurrent production streams from three separate zones. On the "Production" tabbed
page in WellBase, there are now two entries for each month, each with the same
production (Figure 11). Furthermore, cumulative production now stands at 11.5 BCFG
and 172 MBO, exactly twice what it should be!
FORMATION CODE OR RESERVOIR NAME?
Figure 11: WellBase view of Well ID 42215322890000 erroneously showing two streams for the first 9-
months production.
Summary and Conclusions
Appropriate selection of options when setting up a project can facilitate different
project objectives. For regional work, production by Formation Code provides the
benefit of IHS regionally aggregated stratigraphic nomenclature. For field studies,
production by Reservoir Name enables differentiation of multiple producing units within
a given stratigraphic zone. In this latter case, production data zones can be aliased to
aggregate reservoir names as necessary. In any case, commingling these two different
production data formats within a single project will corrupt the production table of the
project database.