Formalism In Literature

What is literary theory?• Literary theory is a set of concepts and methods individuals use in the explaining or interpreting of literature. These theories help to reveal the true meaning of literature through criticism and interpretation of the text.

• Literary theory offers varying approaches for understanding the role of historical context in interpretation as well as the relevance of linguistic and unconscious elements of the text.

• All critical practise regarding literature depends on an underlying structure of ideas in at least two ways: theory provides a rationale for what constitutes the subject matter of criticism – “the literary” – and the specific aims of critical practise – the act of interpretation itself.

What is formalism?• Formalists criticism is a way in which the reader can approach, analyze, and understand a text using conversational narrative structures.

•Formalists try to be objective by ignoring external factors and focusing only on the literature itself.• Formalists see the literary work as an object in its own right.

• Formalism disregards environment, era, and author to focus only on the work itself.

• Formalists believe it is crucial to understand the relationship between the symbol and the object, experience, or emotion being signified.

Continued...• Formalism can cause a reader to see a familiar object or experience from a completely new perspective.

• Formalism analyzes the literary devices and techniques in literature

• Formalists focus on analyzing the irony, imagery, metaphors, characters, symbols and points of view.

• Those who practise formalism do not view works through the lens of feminism, psychology, Marxism, or any other philosophical standpoint. They are also interested in the work’s affect on the reader.

• Formalist critics are able to examine the relationship between form and meaning in a work.

The History of FormalismFormalism, also called Russian Formalism was created by two groups:

• The Moscow Linguistic Circle founded in 1915• The society for the Study of Poetic Language founded in 1916

at St. Petersburg (later Leningrad) led by Viktor Shoklovsky.

Formalism stopped being important in the Soviet Union in 1929 because of the lack of political perspective.

Roman Jakobson made Formalism, or Anglo-American New Criticism, influential in the West.

Formalism arose in the 1920’s and 1930’s and flourished during the 1940’s and 1950’s.

Continued…

Formalism began as a result of a group of men who met regularly to discuss their interpretations and views of the literature they read.

• These men preferred to use a highly structured and scientific approach to examining literature.

• Formalism was created in direct opposition to Marxist literary theory in that Marxism believed literature was a product of its author, influenced by the political and social environment, whereas Formalism believed the text should be viewed on its own terms.

Founders and influential scholars of Russian formalism

Viktor Shklovsky was a Russian and Soviet critic, writer, and pamphleteer. In 1916 he founded the OPOYAZ, one of the two groups, with the Moscow Linguistic Circle.

Boris Eikhenbaum was a Russian and literary scholar, and a representative of Russian formalism. In 1918, Boris joined OPOJAZ and participated in their research until the middle of the 1920s. Eikhenbaum provided definition and interpretation for the group and helped outline their approach to literature.

Roman Jakobson was a Russian linguist and literary theorist. One of the first of the structural analysts of language, which became the dominant trend of linguistics in the first half of the twentieth-century. Jakobson was among the most influential linguists of the century.

Influential scholars of New Criticism

Ivor Armstrong Richards was an influential English literary critic and rhetorician. His books, especially Principles of Literary Criticism and Practical Criticism proved to be founding influences for the New Criticism movement. Richards is regularly considered one of the founders of the contemporary study of literature in English.

John Crowe Ransom was an American poet, essayist, magazine editor, and professor. Ransom was a leading figure of the school of literary criticism known as the New Criticism, which gained its name from his 1941 volume of essays The New Criticism.

Terms used in Formalism1. Tension. It often involves irony or paradox.

2. Intentional fallacy. Formalistic critics refer to the belief that the meaning of a work may be determined by the author’s intention as “the intentional fallacy”.

3. Affective Fallacy. The belief that the meaning or value of a work may be determined by its affect on the reader.

4. Objective correlative. Originated by T. S. Eliot, this term refers to a collection of objects, situations, or events that immediately evoke a specific emotion.

Advantages and Disadvantages of New Criticism.

Pros Cons

Criticism done without research

Text is viewed in isolation

Emphasising the value of literature apart from its context

Formalism ignores the context of the work

Makes literature timeless Reduces literature to nothing more than a collection of rhetorical devices

Formalist critical analysis in “There Will Come Soft Rains”• The charred west side of the house had silhouettes of “… a man mowing a lawn…a woman bent to pick flowers…a small boy, hands flung in the air; higher up, the image of a thrown ball, and opposite him a girl, hands raised to catch a ball which never came down.” The imagery in this quote symbolizes life, but also how life can come to an abrupt end. • Literary devices: - Cacophony: “…voices wailed. Fire, fire, run, run, like a tragic nursery rhyme, a dozen voices, high, low, like children dying in a forest, alone, alone.” - Personification: “It quivered at each sound, the house did.” - Simile: “...it was dropped into the sighing vent of an incinerator which sat like evil Baal in a dark corner.”

Continued...“…Not one would mind, neither bird nor tree, If mankind perished utterly; And Spring herself, when she woke at dawn Would scarcely know that we were gone.” This rhyme sums up the entirety and meaning of the work because the house continued to function even after the homeowners died.

BibliographyFormalism, Encyclopedia Britannicahttp://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/213786/Formalism

Vince Brewton, Literary theory, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophyhttp://www.iep.utm.edu/literary/

Form Follows Function: Russian Formalism, New Criticism, Neo-Aristotelianism; Perdue Owlhttps://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/722/03/

Nicole Smith, An Overview and Extended Definition of Formalism in Literature and Theory, Article Myriadhttp://www.articlemyriad.com/overview-formalism-literature-theory/

Louis Hébert, The Functions of Language, Signohttp://www.signosemio.com/jakobson/functions-of-language.asp

Viktor Borisovich Shklovsky, Encyclopedia Britannicahttp://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/541246/Viktor-Borisovich-Shklovsky

John Crowe Ransom, Poets from the Academy of American poetshttp://www.poets.org/poet.php/prmPID/12

Thank you for your attention

Work Submitted by: Yulia Sankova,

Oksana Kaczala, Kaitlin Montanera

and Eva Gross