The access of adults to formal and non- formal adult education
EducationFormal Education – education that takes place in a formal setting of the school. It...
Transcript of EducationFormal Education – education that takes place in a formal setting of the school. It...
Formal Education – education that takes place in a formal setting of the school.
It involves a specific range of subjects (formal curriculum)
Mastery is tested through formal examinations
Pre-industrial – no need for education – work in and around home
Industrialization brought about mass education – majority formal education
a need to educate the workforce
education is closely linked to the workforce (not accidental)
Education and the Economy
Functionalist View on Education
Society is a social system consisting of different institutions (family, work, education, religion, etc.)
each institution performs essential (core) functions providing the means of survival (work) or secondary socialization (education)
each institution needs things from other institutions to work. Workplace needs individuals with a certain amount of knowledge or skill. Different qualifications of knowledge or skill (degrees/certifications)
DEPENDENT RELATIONSHIP – workplace needs the education system to perform its allotted roles in order for society to function successfully
Functionalist View on Education
Development of Mass Education is explained in terms of functional differentiation – institutions develop to perform particular functions, such as work and education
If one of the needs of the institution are not being met, tensions develop within the system that threaten its stability and ability to function
Stability can only be restored in two ways:
Institution evolves to perform the required function
New institution, like formal education, arises to fulfill the need
Functionalist View on Education
UK Education 1944 Act
Established free, universal education explicitly addresses the relationship between education and the workplace through the distinction between pupils/students/learners
academic pupils – destined to move on to a university and professional employment
vocational pupils – destined to follow a practical or technical track
At age 11 - IQ test determines which track you follow and which kind of school you would go to – grammar school (professional occupations), secondary modern (vocational/service), secondary technical (skilled manual occupations)
Intelligence – capacities and abilities related to the acquisition and demonstration of knowledge and skills, such as problem-solving and decision-making.
The argument that this type of division is functional and necessary is reflected in secondary education systems worldwide
India – academic and vocational, Pakistan – similar to UK
The separation of academic and vocational educational routes reflects a belief in two kinds of work: professional and non-professional
Neo-Functionalist/New Right View on Education
Post-Industrial Societies (like USA)
move away from manufacturing
moving towards service and computer technologies
New focuses in education
breakdown of distinctions between ‘vocational’ and ‘academic’ subjects
move away from all content knowledge to skills
ability to work with others
problem solving
Education looks very different today, than 50 years ago.
Various globalizing processes have caused a long term decline in manufacturing and a rise in the financial and service sectors.
Meritocracy Theory on Education
Meritocracy – system based on equality of opportunity. Those with ability and talent achieve their just rewards regardless of their social characteristics.
Functional importance
Idea that different adult roles are measured according to their social contributions
Example – accountants have higher social status and pay because their role is functionally more important in society Can this be measured objectively? Tautological argument (one that contains its own proof)
Accountants has greater functional significance because it requires high-level academic qualifications therefore this is proof that the occupation is functionally important to the economy
Criticism – assumption that modern education systems sift and sort students in a meritocratic way Very little evidence of this in modern society Societies that use this system likely are marked by inequality
Wealthy families can afford fees for fee-based education which effectively buys them social status rather than children earning it through their own talents.
Meritocracy Theory on Education
Has been suggested that the functionalist view is merely an attempt to justify the inequality in society
Interactionists criticize the idea of meritocracy who would focus on the school processes to show that education is not meritocratic
Marxists argue that ‘meritocracy myth’ hides class reproduction - working class kids get working class jobs not because that’s what they are better suited for but because middle class kids are getting middle class jobs.
Social Democratic Theory on Education
Arguable that traditional functionalism does not consider how modern social systems operate – ideas relevant 50-150 years ago are no longer.
Social Democratic Theory – political theory that advocates technocratic and meritocratic solutions to the problem of differential educational achievement
technological changes shift from a manufacturing lifestyle to a service industry (finance, computing, IT)
social change focused on equality in regards to gender, ethnicity, and class
The solution to these problems in the UK was comprehensive education:
Comprehensive education – system where schools are open to all children, regardless of their ability to pay, where they live or prior educational achievement.
social democrats see comprehensive education as a way of reducing class inequalities by creating more opportunities for working-class children.
Equality of opportunity was not only seen as socially fair, but it opened the door for healthy competition
Would produced a larger number of better-qualified workers to serve the new technological requirements of changing economy
THIS PERSPECTIVE BELIEVES EDUCATION IS THE MEANS THROUGH WHICH PROBLEMS OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE AND SOCIAL INEQUALITY CAN BE ADDRESSED AND MANAGED
A truly meritocratic system would result in a more fair distribution of economic and social rewards, increased social mobility and a decline in social inequality
Social Democratic Theory on Education
Marxist View on Education
Marxism in Education – the structure and organization of the workplace is mirrored in the organization of schools.
Workplace inequalities are reflected and reproduced through the education system in a range of ways:
Behaviors are regulated
compulsory attendance
where to be and when to be there
Hierarchy in the schools
teachers exercise authority over the students
Students have no control over
the process as a whole
content of education
the teaching and learning process
students compete for grades
Correspondence Principle – the organization of schools closely corresponds to the organization and demands of the workplace. for those destined for lower level work, focus is on rule following
for those destined for middle level work, reliability and some ability to work independently is emphasized
for those destined for higher level work, emphasis on independent work and taking some control over their academic work
The relationship between education and the economy is based around cultural reproduction Cultural Reproduction – Marxist idea that higher social classes try to reproduce their leadership
and privileges by investing time, money, and resources in the education of their offspring.
For Marxists, meritocracy is a myth – the education system works in favor of the ruling elite in various ways Payment for private schools, tutoring
Others relate to educational practices such as streaming - where children of different abilities are taught separately
Legitimating myth – education system has appearance of fairness, equality and merit, when in fact it’s the opposite.
Marxist View on Education
Formal curriculum assists cultural reproduction through streaming
Streaming shows students that life is ‘unequal’, and this is normal
Cultural reproduction is disguised as a consequence of the choices students make and their differing levels of ability or aptitude
Ideological State Apparatus (ISA) – Marxist concept that argues that institutions such as schools encourage values favorable to the interests of a ruling class in capitalist societies.
Vocational education has advantages for ruling class
eliminates working-class children as competitors for high-level jobs
gives the appearance of being ‘chosen’ through academic performance
Marxist View on Education
Vocationalism – the knowledge and skills required for specific types of employment.
Work-experience programs (young people)
government subsidizes employers (pay salaries) to take employees and train them in vocational positions.
Schools should make different types of academic and vocational education available based on the responses of what students different interests and experiences
Long-term unemployed
must take unpaid work
employees lose government benefits if they leave the job (is this fair?)
Marxist View on Education
Criticisms of Marxist Perspective
working-class students are not passive
students resist following rules
schools are autonomous and interpret curriculum as they wish
Marxist View on Education
Feminist View on Education
Feminist Argument – the relationship between education and the economy is one in which men and women are channeled into different types and levels of work
Horizontal segregation – refers to the idea that many occupations are sex segregated
Female-Dominated Professions - teaching, nursing, secretarial
Worse working conditions, job security, and lower wages
Male-Dominated Professions - engineering, computing, construction
Primary labor markets involve companies with high levels of job security, career prospects and wages
Feminist View on Education
Even in fields where women are the primary workers, males tend to dominate the higher level positions. - ie – teachers/principals, nurses/doctors, etc. (women relegated to ‘secondary labor markets’)
Gendered Curriculum – situation in which males and females choose, or are given, different subjects to study.
Subject Choices
girls typically choose English, Psychology, Sociology, Art, Design
boys typically choose Physics, Business, Physical Education
Shop Class / Home Economics
UK Educational Achievement
Educational Achievement – gaining different levels of educational qualification UK
girls are consistently outperforming boys at all levels of the UK examination system. But this is not helping women into well-paid jobs.
One cause of the discrepancy between achievement and occupation is Gender Stereotyping – assigning particular characteristics to whole gender groups, regardless of their individual differences.
Stereotypes Girls – childcare, nursing, hairdressing, secretarial
Boys – computing, accounting, plumbing
Gender Stereotyping – most fully pronounced in vocational programs 45% of girls allocated to caring placements although it did not reflect their choices
Boys allocated to placements considered as traditionally male
Girls unsuccessful in their preferred placements, were allocated to traditionally female occupations.
Therefore, vocational training is more likely to result in both male and females being channeled into traditional forms of gendered employment, however it can also be argued that academic education does not necessarily guarantee a lack of stereotyping and segregation
Educational Achievement & Intelligence
Many disagreements on what intelligence is and how it should be measured
In education, the most common test of intelligence is an Intelligent Quotient (IQ) Test– a specific measure of individual intelligence, where a score of 100 is average, conventionally based on tests of mathematical, verbal and spatial skills.
IQ – used at age 11 to determine who is set on grammar school track or vocational track.
SAT – partly used for entrance into college in the USA
Educational Achievement & Intelligence
Supporters argue that they measure ‘intelligence’ independently of class, gender, age, or ethnicity
Ethnicity – expression of the cultural background of different groups, which includes factors such as religious affiliations, country of birth and residence, cultural beliefs, traditions, and customs.
Critics argue that prior education, reading habits, experience with tests, cultural upbringing, mental and physical health will effect scores.
Critics argue that intelligence is too complex to be reduced to simple forms of testing. These tests are all context dependent.
IQ tests justify social and academic segregation
IQ tests provide support for middle and upper classes families to have a privileged status.
List the pros and cons of using IQ tests to measure intelligence and education
Educational Achievement & Intelligence
Intelligence and achievement may be socially constructed and explanations for their relationships take place in three forms: agnostic, positive, and negative
Agnostic – we do not know if there is a correlation between intelligence and achievement
1. there is no agreed definition of intelligence so we do not know what is being measured.
2. if we could agree on what intelligence is, there is no consensus about how it can be reliably and validly measured.
Further problems arise if intelligence is conceptualized as a relationship
This means it is seen as something fluid, created by individuals as they go about their lives and expressed in different ways and contexts, rather than as a permanent quality.
Suggests intelligence develops through cultural practices and ways of learning rather than it being something we are born with.
Intelligence is difficult to define precisely, but we can all agree that it refers to ability as opposed to achievement
Educational Achievement & Intelligence
Positive Correlation – argues we can assume IQ tests measure significant aspects of intelligence in the form cognitive skills - research shows a positive correlation between intelligence and educational achievement.
In the UK, Saunders argues that intelligence while not determined at birth differs amongst social classes.
knowledge and experience passed from middle class parents to children
middle class parents instill the importance of educational qualifications.
Intelligent working-class children are educationally successful and rise into the middle class – social selection
Middle class children who fail to capitalize on their social advantages fall back into the working class
Middle class children will, on average, be more intelligent than working class children.
Educational Achievement & Intelligence
Negative – follows two lines of reasoning No surprise if there is no correlation between intelligence and educational achievement
mainly because the skills valued and taught in schools and tested in public examinations are those measured by IQ tests
Educational achievement is not related to intelligence, rather it is related to cultural factors inside and outside the education system that allow some students to do well but severely limit the ability of tohers.
“The vast majority of one’s ultimate niche is society is determined by non-IQ factors, ranging from social class to luck” Social Class – the individual’s position in a class-based system of social stratification,
conventionally defined by occupation. Some argue that because the people who make the IQ tests are from the educated middle
class that if you score high on the IQ tests then you must be as intelligent as the person who made the test. The values reflected in IQ testes are those of the middle class.
Relationship b/w Education & Social Mobility
Social Mobility – the ability to move up or down the class structure
relative to where you start
Inter-generational mobility – movement between generations, parent and child as adult
Intra-generational mobility – movement within one person’s lifetime
Modern Industrial Societies – position in society is not fixed by characteristics such as age, gender, or ethnicity, rather it is earned or achieved on the basis of factors such as educational qualifications
Consensus Approaches
Functionalism – the relationship between education and social mobility focus on how education system represents a bridge between family and the economy
important social positions are filled by those most qualified
upward mobility earned through merit
Meritocracy – inevitable that mass education systems develop in modern industrial societies, because their primary function is differentiation– allowing individuals to demonstrate their differences in objective ways
high pay and high status are rewards for abilities and efforts in education, therefore inequality is inevitable
must be equal opportunity for everyone
Neo-Functionalism / New Right
blends a meritocracy with individual and group’s choices.
if societies provide the same opportunities to their members through meritocratic schooling system, then educational success or failure results from the different choices people make
Consensus Approaches
Social Inequality – unequal and unfair distribution of resources in any system such as education. - Inequality of educational opportunity, for example, refers to the way some children are treated unfairly based on class, gender, or ethnicity.
Social Capital – extent to which people are connected to social networks (who you know) and how this can be used to their advantage.
Why do functionalists believe that education systems must be meritocratic?
Consensus Approaches
Equality of Opportunity – absence of discrimination within institutions such as schools
According to Neo-Functionalists, out choices determine out outcomes. - Do you choose to work hard in school, or do you choose to drop out of school and get pregnant?
Marketization – process whereby the supply and consumption of educational goods and services are opened up to private and public competition. Neo-functionalist approach argues that schools should be privately owned rather than
state controlled Must respond to consumer demand by continually innovating and improving their service
to attract and retain customers
This approach of marketization is seen as being limited by producer capture – limits a child’s chances of mobility, especially children from lower levels of society who cannot afford to pay for an alternative education to that offered by the state
Cultural Capital – anything in the individual’s cultural background that gives them advantages over others. - ie - higher educational qualifications are exchanged for more better jobs and higher pay.
Conflict Approaches
While consensus approaches generally see open, competitive and meritocratic education system as the most important source of social mobility in modern industrial societies, conflict approaches take the opposite view
Education is not a source of social mobility but rather the means through which bourgeois class is able to cement its privileged social position.
Marxism – main role of education is Cultural reproduction through education, cement your social status
educate the masses just enough to be useful employees, then a select few ‘more than enough’ to rule over them
education is a way of reproducing inequality in the workplace
costs associated with advancing educationally are huge.
Neo-Marxism - inequality like Marxism, but with the ‘consent’ of the led, particularly through the media. - IQ tests and myth of equality of opportunity has people blaming themselves - the myth of meritocracy
Functionalism – Causes of educational underachievement
Functionalism – supports argument for a meritocratic system.
Working Class underachievement explained by cultural deprivation
Cultural Deprivation – a lack of important cultural resources such as parental encouragement are the cause of educational underachievement of working class.
parental interest in education
family size (poorer families are typically larger)
position within family (older children typically achieve more)
deficient care of babies (at home parenting has positive effect)
Cultural Deprivation
Cultural deprivation has two main applications: Working-class children encounter difficulties adjusting to middle-class norms and values found in
schools.
Elaborated speech codes – complex vocabulary and ideas. (Middle Class) clashes with restricted speech codes – simple language to convey direct meanings. Predictable and express relatively simple, straightforward ideas. (Working Class)
Restricted speech of students clashes with the elaborated speech of middle class teachers. Research shows that this has influenced teacher assessments.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvdaMYWq5yM
Cultural Deprivation
Wider-economic pressures on family life result in working-class children leaving school at the earliest opportunity.
Immediate Gratification – parental attitudes and economic pressure has working class children leave school to
enter workforce at earliest opportunity.
families living hand to mouth
Goodman and Gregg (2010)
80% of most affluent mothers expected their children to go to universities
40% of least affluent mothers “hoped” their children would go to university
Children from poorer families believed they were less academic and were consequently less concerned about
doing well academically than their middle class peers
Compensatory Education
Contemporary ideas about cultural deprivation have focused on ways of compensating working-class children for their dysfunctional family life to give them an equal opportunity to compete with their culturally advantaged middle-class peers
Compensatory Education – supplementary educational programs designed to compensate children for their deprived home background.
services provided to pre-school children and families to increase achievements
programs to get pregnant teenagers back into school
outside of school activities and events to encourage parent involvement
New Right Perspective
Argues that material and cultural factors are the causes of the educational failure of those disconnected from society.
the socially excluded are not just poor but are victims of anti-education, anti-marriage policies which have undermined personal responsibility
The argument is that the underclass is responsible for their underachievement due to parents not taking responsibility for socialization and childcare.
Higher number of female-headed single-parent households that fail to provide role models for male children
poor parenting
‘anti-school’ peer pressure
inability to take responsibility for their own behavior
New Right Perspective
Suggests that the disproportionate representation of ethnic minorities in the underclass is related to failures in their cultural organization
Caribbean families – highest rates of single parent house and lowest rates of educational achievement
High levels of academic achievement of Asian students has a correlation to parent attitudes, higher marriage rates, and supportive extended families.
Other Explanations
Social Exclusion – being excluded from participation in social institutions such as education or employment.
Many working class parents argue they care about education but feel excluded from decision making within schools
marginalized youth struggle to come to terms with their low status and social exclusion
Marxists believe that differential achievement comes from material deprivation and cultural capital.
Material deprivation – a cause of educational underachievement, refers to factors such as poverty, a lack of
physical resources, etc.
Marxists focus on materialistic explanations of poverty
poor diet
lack of study facilities
need to work to help family
Marxism & Educational Achievement
Education systems are dominated by middle class norms, values, and beliefs. This creates a class sub-culture within schools and many students can not adapt.
Middle class – educational qualifications are an important way of reproducing individual class positions
Working class – the work-based route to money and status has always been more important
the by-products are underachievement, truancy and exclusion
Social class is the best predictor of academic achievement
Suggest a way in which material deprivation may disadvantage working class pupils
Marxist View: Gender and Ethnicity in Education
Marxists focus on gender in education by looking at gender within social class. - go figure… Marxism and Social Classes
Little difference in male/female attainment in math/science
No difference at the lowest achievement levels for all other subjects
Girls do better than boys among mid-to-high achievers with a correlation between achievement and class that there is between achievement and gender
Ethnicity is a good general predictor of educational achievement
some argue this is correlated to social class
some argue that there is institutional and cultural racism
Labelling – a process by naming something and, by so doing, associating it with a specific set of social characteristics
Implies that school processes such as labelling, stereotyping and low teacher/pupil expectations are potentially significant explanations
Schools can make a difference; levels of working class achievement can be raised but the behavior and expectations of teachers can also compound the levels of material and cultural disadvantages many working-class children bring to the school.
Do schools fail to inspire and educate working class pupils?
Feminist View on Education Today
Feminism has shifted from female underachievement to learning to cope with school and workplace disadvantages.
girls now typically outperform boys academically
Traditional gender roles are stronger with working class girls
Today families are getting more involved in their daughters education
Today girls have a wider range of gender identities
Feminist View on Education Today
Natural differences – brain functions
Feminization of schools
Lack of male role models in schools
Female-friendly teaching practices
Positive discrimination – preferential treatment based on the individual’s class, gender, ethnicity and so forth.
Curricula reflects positive discrimination in favor of girls - ie – AICE Sociology, dual burden, triple shift, etc.
Relationship b/w Class, Gender, & Ethnicity
Combination approaches are typically associated with Marxist perspective
Marxists – Class is the primary factor, gender and ethnicity are subgroups of class
Educational Achievement Predictors - class is the best predictor of educational achievement - ethnicity is in the middle - gender is the narrowest
Compounding of inequalities are more significant than simply class, gender, or ethnicity
Modernity & Education
Formal Curriculum is defined by those in power (Marxism)
Remember cultural reproduction? – the ability of the ruling class to pass on its political and economic demonization from one generation to the next
Teachers are agents of ideological control who transform pupil consciousness by trying to get them to accept the realities of life and their likely future social positions
Education, the media and religion are seen as instruments of class oppression and domination through the power they have over what people learn and how they learn it
Access to knowledge is limited through control of curriculum
Exams validate qualifications – make sure students are reaching “approved” levels
Some knowledge is more valuable than others, (AICE v. core v. electives)
Clear division between vocational and theoretical knowledge
Suggest one way in which knowledge is categorized in schools
De-Schooling – A reaction to Modernity
De-Schooling – proposed by Illich, based on the abolition of formal schools.
His basic ideas about power and control:
1. Institutionalization – schools destroy student creativity, and through qualifications turn education into a commodity.
2. Professionalism – the middle class teachers are shaping the structure, content, and development of the curriculum in their own image. Middle class is deciding what “legitimate knowledge” is.
3. Commodification – Institutionalism and Professionalism are turning something abstract, “knowledge”, into something concrete, “qualification”.
The distinction between education and training according to Dewey and followed by Illich:
Education should be transformative, focusing on individuals and their social, psychological, and moral development as people in ways that enable them to achieve their full potential
Training is the mechanical and repetitive learning of a narrow range of undisputed facts
Briefly explain what is meant by the “commodification of learning”. Suggest one weakness with the idea that learning has been commodified
Cultural Capital (Neo-Marxist)
Cultural Capital – different advantages and disadvantages conferred by people’s cultural histories.
Provides a significant mechanism for cultural reproduction that is carried out by the education system “in the background”
Critical of the theory that schools operate on meritocratic lines because differences in cultural capital influence both the relative starting points of students as they enter the education and their relative starting points of students and their relative progress throughout the system.
Middle and Upper classes are willing to invest more time, money and effort into their children’s education. - This gives these students a distinct advantage - This undermines the idea of a meritocracy
Postmodernist View on Education
Postmodernists – see schools as systems of social control - teachers and students are constantly challenging the systems of control- question their roles and demanding greater control
The tension between both of these processes has important implications for both the social construction of knowledge and learning, and how power and control are exercised and experienced. The control operates on two different levels:
Mental Control - subjects, knowledge, curriculum (which texts we read)
Physical Control - Bodies – what teachers and pupils can and can not do, ie- where to sit, when to speak, etc.
- Space – security, patrolled hallways, bell schedules
Structure - periods, bells, quantification through tests, little sense of individuality
Teacher-Pupil Relationships
Teacher/Student relationship is key to having students ‘conform’ to a particular teaching style. - this affects a student’s perception of education
Teaching Styles - teacher-centered – teacher directs and informs class - demonstrator – teacher-centered but focus on demonstration and having students experiment - student-centered – teacher as facilitator, students responsible for learning - delegation – students work independently of teacher
Students “Switching Off”
When pupils fail to see what they are learning as useful now and in the future, it turns a large number of them off to learning.
This is influenced by teaching styles and teacher-pupil relationships.
Two typical responses by students
learned dependence - educationally successful students quickly learn to follow what the demands.
experienced alienation - students see school, teachers and education as alien, irrelevant and threatening.
These responses have their origins at home, based on values and norms.
Higher suspension/expulsion rates for working-class students
Middle/Upper Class students see school as “gaining qualifications”
Hidden Curriculum
Hidden Curriculum – things students learn through the ‘process’ of attending school, both positive and negative. ie – making friends, consequences of disobeying authority.
Informal Education – things students learn that are not part of the curriculum. ie- value of learning, behavior within the school, attitudes of authority.
Socialization Messages – behavior to succeed in school ie – attendance, rules, recognize teacher’s authority, not question what is being taught
Status Messages – Messages relate to the ideas a student has about their “worth” ie – private schools, school grade, streaming (labels), academic/vocational
Identify something pupils informally learn from the experience of attending school
Labeling & Streaming
Labeling determined by classes (AP/regular) also by reputation.
Cultural capital has a significant impact on a student’s ability to negotiate barriers to success such as exams or negative labeling.
Streaming has a strong correlation with social class. Middle/Upper classes in the higher streams.
Streams make students feel like a “success” or “failure”
Labels have a crucial influence on how students are perceived by new teachers.
Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
Self-Fulfilling Prophecy – a prediction about something, such as ‘ability’ that, by being made, causes it to occur.
Teacher beliefs about ‘good’ and ‘bad’ students are transmitted by attitudes and behavior.
Class, gender and ethnicity consciously and subconsciously influence labeling
Think about labels that we assign to girls and boys in school……
Now lets think about professions dominated by males and females……
Can a whole school receive a positive or negative label?
Ethnicity in Education
Overt Racism plays some part in the experience of schooling - White British students have less positive attitudes towards immigrants of other countries - Saturday (neighborhood supplementary schooling) exists because black communities feel dissatisfied with ‘white institutions’ failing them,
Cultural Racism (ethnocentrism) is a more subtle form of racism - ethnocentric curriculum involves teaching practices and expectations based on cultural norms, histories, and cultural references unfamiliar to ethnic-minorities - lack of role models within schools for ethnic minority pupils. 5% of UK teachers are ethnic minorities, while 15% of students are ethnic minorities
Ethnicity in Education- UK examples
Criticism from teachers, stereotypes of cultural differences, communities or speech… all affect academic performance
Black Caribbean boys do the worst in UK schools + are set in the lowest bands.
Black Caribbean families have the highest rates of single parenthood, and have the lowest rates of educational achievement.
Subtle forms of labeling and stereotyping seem to influence educational experiences. - how students are expected to speak and write - teachers generally underrate abilities of black Caribbean students
Gender in Education
Gender differences in school go back to the socialization process at home - expectations and gender roles are different
Labeling - girls are increasingly labeled as high achievers who work hard and have the least behavioral problems - boys are increasingly negatively labeled in terms of underachievement, laziness, and behavioral problems.