Forecast for India · India Highlights should facilitate quicker decision central bank (RBI)...
Transcript of Forecast for India · India Highlights should facilitate quicker decision central bank (RBI)...
1 Economist: Nida Ali | Tel: +44 207 803 1423 | e-mail: [email protected]
12 Jun
2014
India Highlights
India’s electorate delivered a clear verdict in the 2014
general elections. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
won 282 seats of 543 in the lower house of
parliament, comfortably above the 272 required for a
simple majority. The unexpectedly clear mandate
provides a stable platform for governance, and
should facilitate quicker decision-making at the
centre, reduce uncertainty and political risk. This has
led to considerable optimism in financial markets,
with share prices scaling record highs and the rupee
appreciating. However, in our view, given the very
stubborn nature of some of the fundamental problems
facing India, it is too early to assume any marked
improvement in the country’s economic outlook.
Indeed, GDP growth in Q1 disappointed. The
economy expanded by just 4.6% year-on-year, below
our expectation of 5.2% growth. Manufacturing output
fell for the fourth consecutive quarter, while services
growth slowed from 6.4% in Q4 2013 to 5.8%. In view
of the sluggish data, we have revised down our GDP
growth forecast for 2014 from 4.7% to 4.5%.
Although the risks to India’s economy have tempered
considerably since last year, with the current account
deficit narrowing sharply and the fiscal deficit also
improving, the outlook is still weak. High inflation,
relatively tight monetary and fiscal policy and high
corporate debt levels will continue to exert a drag on
domestic demand. And while net exports will continue
to contribute positively to growth, this will largely
reflect weak imports rather than strong exports.
With headline CPI inflation still stubbornly high, the
central bank (RBI) maintained its policy rate at 8% in
June. Moreover the likelihood of a disappointing
monsoon raising food inflation remains high,
suggesting that interest rates will not be cut in the
near future. Instead, the RBI has lowered the
Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) – banks’ mandatory
investment in government bonds – by 50 basis points
to 22.5% to ensure that banks have the scope to lend
more when credit demand picks up. But, on its own,
the move will not have any visible impact on growth.
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017Domestic Demand 6.2 2.8 4.3 4.9 6.1 7.1
Private Consumption 5.7 4.0 4.7 3.9 7.4 8.0
Fixed Investment 2.4 1.0 1.6 4.7 6.4 7.8
Stockbuilding & discrep (% of GDP) 3.7 3.3 4.6 4.9 3.8 3.1
Government Consumption 7.6 4.4 -1.4 8.1 7.4 6.7
Exports of Goods and Services 8.3 5.3 5.2 6.4 6.4 6.0
Imports of Goods and Services 11.6 -1.0 3.1 6.0 6.3 7.8
GDP 4.8 4.7 4.5 4.9 6.1 6.6
Industrial Production 0.7 0.6 3.1 6.0 6.4 6.5
Consumer Prices 9.7 10.1 8.4 7.6 6.8 6.3
Current Balance (% of GDP) -5.4 -2.8 -1.9 -2.4 -2.1 -1.7
Government Budget (% of GDP) -5.8 -5.9 -4.5 -4.4 -4.1 -3.6
Current Account ($bn) -91.5 -49.2 -36.4 -49.8 -48.0 -43.3
Trade Balance ($bn) -201.7 -162.6 -162.8 -166.5 -167.8 -177.7
Short-Term Interest Rate (%) 9.47 9.32 9.09 8.08 7.75 7.67
Exchange Rate (Rupee per US$) 53.5 58.6 60.4 61.5 63.5 65.6
* Refers to Calendar year
Forecast for India *
(Annual percentage changes unless specified)
Country Economic Forecast
2 Economist: Nida Ali, Economist | Tel: +44 207 803 1423 | e-mail: [email protected]
12 Jun
2014
Research Briefing The end of an era…enough reason to be optimistic?
There was a dramatic end to the general elections last week, with the country’s electorate
delivering a clear verdict. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) won 282 seats of 543 in the lower
house of parliament (Lok Sabha), comfortably above the 272 seats required for a simple majority.
With an embarrassingly low 44 seats, the Congress party, which led the coalition government for
the past ten years, did not even reach the 10% threshold for forming the opposition. This election
marks an end of the coalition politics characterising India’s politics since 1984, but it may not be an
end to the crony capitalism that is holding back India’s growth.
Clear mandate positive for economy…
The landslide victory came as a surprise. We were
expecting the BJP to win the most seats, but we thought
they would have to align themselves with other parties to
form a coalition – which would make reform more difficult
to achieve. The clear mandate provides a better, more
stable platform for governance. In the absence of
stubborn regional parties determined to protect their
states’ electorate and stand in the way of pro-growth
reforms, it will facilitate quicker decision-making at the
centre. It will also help to reduce uncertainty and political
risk, potentially leading to higher business and consumer
confidence. For this reason, Moody’s credit rating agency
deemed the election outcome “credit positive”.
…but optimism appears overdone
Financial markets welcomed the BJP win; not just
because of the clear majority, but also because the BJP
has earned a reputation for being pro-business. Many
believe it will help to lift India out of its current economic
mire. Share prices scaled record highs and the rupee
strengthened to its highest level since last June.
Fiscal position still precarious
We take a more cautiously optimistic stance on the
election results, however. India is still suffering from a
number of fundamental problems that will take time to
eradicate. The fiscal position remains precarious and
anecdotal evidence suggests that the public finances are
in a much worse state than has been officially reported.
Therefore, the new government will have little wriggle
room to increase capital expenditure to boost
infrastructure and raise potential growth. Corporate debt
as well as bad loans in the financial sector have risen
substantially, holding back the much-needed kick-start to
investment.
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
Jan 2011 Jan 2012 Jan 2013 Jan 2014
Index (Dec 30, 2010 = 100)
Source: Haver Analytics
India: Equity market
MSCI Emerging Markets (US$)
Bombay Sensex
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018
Source: Oxford Economics / CEIC
India: Investment as a % of GDP
Forecast
% of GDP
India
3 Economist: Nida Ali, Economist | Tel: +44 207 803 1423 | e-mail: [email protected]
12 Jun
2014
So regardless of the party in power, businesses will still
struggle to invest and banks to lend.
Crony capitalism needs to go
In the longer term, to be able to achieve the
government’s target growth rate of around 8%, India
needs an institutional overhaul aimed at reducing crony
capitalism and improving the business environment.
There is scant evidence to suggest that the BJP is much
better than the Congress in this regard. Indeed, the
Prime Minister designate, Mr Narendra Modi, has close
ties with big businesses like the Tata, Reliance, Ambani
and Adani groups. It would be surprising if he were not to
show favouritism towards these giant corporate entities.
While having a good relationship with them should help
to develop the country’s infrastructure, it will also promote
the culture of crony capitalism and prevent smaller
businesses from flourishing. Not only will this have a net
negative impact on the economy, it is also likely to extend
the acute inequality that currently prevails in India.
It’s too early to be sure of reform
The BJP has mentioned reform and development as
primary objectives in its election manifesto, but it remains
to be seen whether the party will deliver on these
promises. Links to an extremist right-wing group
(Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) characterised by Hindu
Nationalism, together with Mr. Modi’s track record of
inaction when thousands of Muslims were killed in 2002
during riots in Gujarat raise questions in some quarters
about the priorities and integrity of the BJP. So while we
believe there is reason to be optimistic, it is too early to
celebrate an economic revival in India.
This article was originally published on 20 May as a
Research Briefing for our newly launched Global
Macro Service (Asia Pacific).
India
4 Economist: Nida Ali, Economist | Tel: +44 207 803 1423 | e-mail: [email protected]
12 Jun
2014
Forecast Overview
Q1 GDP disappoints…
The Indian economy expanded by 4.6% year-on-year in
Q1 2014, well below our expectation of 5.2% growth.
Manufacturing output fell for the fourth consecutive
quarter, declining by 1.4% year-on-year, while services
growth slowed from 6.4% in Q4 2013 to 5.8%. The
expenditure side painted a mixed picture; consumer
spending was unexpectedly strong (after two particularly
weak quarters) but investment continued to stagnate.
In light of this generally discouraging data, we have cut
our growth forecast for 2014 from 4.7% to 4.5%.
…and the outlook remains problematic…
Although growth was only very moderate in Q1, India is
at least a lot less vulnerable to adverse economic
shocks than in 2013; the current account deficit has
narrowed sharply and the fiscal deficit has also
improved. Despite this, there are numerous problems
that will continue to hold growth back in the short term:
High inflation – wholesale price (WPI) inflation
remains above the RBI’s 5% comfort zone, albeit it
did fall back to 5.2% in April. Meanwhile, CPI inflation
rose to 8.6% in April, from 8% in February, far above
the recommended target of 4% (+/- 2% band). In
addition, the prospects of below-average monsoon
rains have raised the risk of inflation increasing
further in the coming months, as it will restrict food
supply and therefore boost food price inflation. As a
result, high inflation will continue to eat into
consumers’ purchasing power.
Relatively tight monetary policy – given high
inflation, the RBI maintained the repo rate at 8% in
June. And with inflation expected to remain sticky in
the coming months, we do not expect interest rates to
be cut until early 2015. Relatively high interest rates
are damaging growth by encouraging consumers to
save rather than spend and discouraging businesses
from borrowing to invest. Having said that, the RBI
has lowered the Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) –
banks’ mandatory investment in government bonds –
by 50 basis points to 22.5% to ensure that banks
have more resources when credit demand picks up.
Rising corporate debt – India’s corporate sector is
now highly leveraged, with many companies having
borrowed on the assumption that the economy would
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Source: Reserve Bank of India
%
India: Exchange and interest ratesRupee/US$
Repo rate
(RHS)
Rupee/US$
(LHS)
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
% year
Producer prices
Consumer prices
Source: India Ministry of Commerce & Industry
India: Inflation
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017
% year
F'cast
Source: Oxford Economics
Domestic
demand GDP
Net exports
India: Contributions to GDP
India
5 Economist: Nida Ali, Economist | Tel: +44 207 803 1423 | e-mail: [email protected]
12 Jun
2014
keep on growing by around 8% pa. According to the
IMF, India’s debt-to-equity ratio is elevated at 83%;
the highest among all emerging markets, and only
surpassed by Greece and Italy. At the same time, the
levels of bad debt in the financial system have also
risen rapidly. These factors will limit the banks’ ability
to lend and businesses’ desire to invest.
Only moderate export growth – export growth has
cooled this year, following a solid expansion during
H2 2013. In addition to subdued global demand,
exports are probably also being held back by supply-
side constraints including weak infrastructure in the
power and transport sectors. Net trade will continue
to contribute to growth, but this will reflect sluggish
imports rather than strong exports.
No room for flexible fiscal policy – India narrowly
avoided a sovereign credit rating downgrade to junk
status in 2013 after several years of missing its fiscal
targets. However, there are high hopes that the new
government will develop key power and transport
infrastructure and reduce supply-side bottlenecks.
But without a wider tax base the government has little
room for manoeuvre on the fiscal front and its scope
to increase capital expenditure will be limited.
…despite unexpectedly clear election result
India’s electorate delivered a clear verdict in the 2014
general elections. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) won
282 seats of 543 in the lower house of parliament (Lok
Sabha), comfortably above the 272 required for a simple
majority, while the Congress party won just 44 seats.
This marks an end to coalition politics in India for the first
time since 1984.
The clear mandate should provide a stable platform for
governance, reduce uncertainty and political risk, and
improve sentiment across the economy. It should
facilitate quicker decision-making, with the government
no longer having to negotiate with stubborn regional
parties determined to protect their states’ electorate and
stand in the way of pro-growth reforms. Investors have
reacted very positively, with share prices scaling record
highs. However, given the deep-seated nature of many
of the problems facing the Indian economy, we think that
it is too early to assume a more upbeat medium-term
economic outlook than previously. Many of the required
reforms and initiatives will have adverse consequences
for some people in the short term and it remains to be
seen whether the new government will have the
determination to press on in the face of protests.
32
39
39
46
47
50
57
59
60
66
77
83
0 20 40 60 80 100
South Africa
Malaysia
Poland
Singapore
Turkey
China
Thailand
Mexico
Russia
Indonesia
Brazil
India
Debt to equity (non-financial corporations)%
Source : IMF
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Source: Bombay Stock Exchange
Bombay SE
India: Stockmarket000s
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
20
30
40
50
60
70
1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017
% of GDP
F'cast
Source: Oxford Economics
Government
debt (RHS)
Central government
balance (LHS)
India: Government budget balance and debt% of GDP
India
6 Economist: Nida Ali, Economist | Tel: +44 207 803 1423 | e-mail: [email protected]
12 Jun
2014
Risk Assessment
India’s economic situation deteriorated significantly
between 2011 and 2013, so making the country more
vulnerable to domestic or external shocks. GDP growth
has slowed and the twin deficits have only recently
narrowed from unsustainable levels after drastic action
by the government, including policies to curb gold
imports and sharp cuts to capital spending. And although
the economy is now more stable, sluggish growth and
unfavourable domestic conditions (including high
inflation, tight monetary policy and a poor investment
environment) mean that much needs to be done before
the country is on a more secure footing.
On a more positive note, the formation of the new
government in May under the BJP, which won a clear
mandate in the elections, will help to reduce economic
uncertainty and political risk, and could spur a pick-up in
investment if structural reform is quickly initiated.
Emerging risks
Further capital outflows – despite making progress in
cutting the twin deficits, the Indian economy remains
vulnerable to capital outflows stemming from domestic or
external shocks, such as tighter monetary policy in the
US. Such developments could pose a significant
downside risk to our baseline forecast, as heightened
uncertainty would discourage investment while capital
outflows would push the exchange rate down and
inflation and interest rates up.
Key risk scenarios
Emerging market capital outflows – another round of
outflows of foreign capital would hit the economy hard by
weakening the exchange rate, pushing inflation up and
forcing the central bank to raise the repo rate sharply.
Growth might slow to around 2% in 2015, compared to
around 5% in the baseline.
China banking crisis – although India’s exposure to
China is relatively limited, the country would be quite
badly affected, since a banking crisis in China would not
only trigger capital outflows from emerging markets, but
also lead to a sharp global slowdown. Outflows of
capital, coupled with trade linkages with other countries
in the Asia Pacific region and beyond which are heavily
exposed to China, would hit India’s economy hard. In
this scenario, growth might slow to around 4% a year in
2014-19, compared to 6% a year in the baseline.
2013 2014 2017
India 51 53 44
World average 29 28 26
Sovereign risk 45 45 39
Trade credit risk 67 67 52
Political risk 51 63 55
Regulatory risk 33 32 30
Fiscal position is less
precarious now
Government debt to fall over
the forecast horizon
External debt remains at a
manageable level
Risk scenarios
GDP growth
CPI inflation
Current account balance
Government balance
Government debt
External debt
Risk index (0=no risk, 100=highest risk)
Risk warnings
GDP growth to remain below
5% in both 2014 and 2015
Inflation has moderated but
still uncomfortably high
Deficit halved as a % of GDP
in 2013
-1
1
3
4
6
US-led upside
Russia Ukraine tensionescalates
Eurozone slumps into deflation
Capital flows out of EMs
China Banking Crisis
Impact of scenarios on risk indexMaximum impact of scenarios on risk index
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Baseline
Capital flows out of EMs
China Banking Crisis
Russia Ukraine tension escalates
% year
Source : Oxford Economics
Impact of scenarios on GDP growth
India
7 Economist: Nida Ali, Economist | Tel: +44 207 803 1423 | e-mail: [email protected]
12 Jun
2014
Long-Term Prospects
Favourable factors for long-term growth
GDP growth in India is expected to average 6.5% a year
in 2016-18, up from 4.7% a year in 2013-15. This
improvement is driven by:
Favourable demographics – India’s working age
population is expected to grow strongly over the next
two decades.
Rising middle class – the middle class is on course
to expand. Indeed, the number of households with an
income greater than US$30,000 is likely to more than
double over the next decade.
Competitiveness – India is competitive in
international markets, with relative unit labour costs
among the lowest of the BRIC economies.
But weak infrastructure – key sectors such as power
and transport are suffering from inadequate
infrastructure, which has prevented supply from
increasing in line with growing demand. This will
prevent India from achieving its target growth rate of
8% a year in the long term.
0
3000
6000
9000
12000
15000
18000
21000
24000
1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020
Source: Oxford Economics
India: Actual & potential output
Actual
Potential
Rupee billion, 2004/2005 prices
Forecast
2003-2012 2013-2022
Potential GDP* 7.6 6.0
Employment at NAIRU 1.1 1.8
Capital Stock 9.1 7.2
Total Factor Productivity 3.8 2.3
*ln(Potential GDP)=0.65*ln(Employment at NAIRU)
+0.35*ln(Capital Stock)+ln(Total Factor Productivity)
Potential GDP and Its Components
Average Percentage Growth
2003-2007 2008-2012 2013-2017 2018-2022
GDP 8.5 7.3 5.4 6.7
Consumption 6.9 7.7 5.6 7.0
Investment 15.3 7.4 4.3 7.2
Government Consumption 4.2 9.7 5.0 5.7
Exports of Goods and Services 21.3 10.2 5.9 5.5
Imports of Goods and Services 18.3 13.6 4.4 8.1
Unemployment (%) 12.8 12.5 12.5 12.5
Consumer Prices 4.8 9.6 7.8 5.3
Current Balance (% of GDP) -0.4 -3.5 -2.2 -1.4
Exchange Rate (vs US$) 44.5 47.6 61.9 72.3
General Government Balance (% of GDP) -4.2 -5.9 -4.5 -2.8
Short-term Interest Rates (%) 6.6 8.2 8.4 7.6
Working Population 2.1 2.0 1.6 1.3
Labour Supply 1.5 0.6 1.8 1.8
Participation Ratio -0.3 -1.5 -0.1 0.5
Labour Productivity 6.7 6.6 3.5 4.8
(Average annual percentage change unless otherwise stated)
Long-Term Forecast for India
India
8 Economist: Nida Ali, Economist | Tel: +44 207 803 1423 | e-mail: [email protected]
12 Jun
2014
Background
Having rarely recorded GDP growth of above 7% prior to 2003, the Indian economy chalked up five consecutive
years above that figure between 2003-07, with 9%+ growth registered in 2005-07. This not only propelled the
country into the economic “fast lane” alongside China but also meant that it was making an important
contribution to the overall increase in world GDP. However, India still has a very long way to go along the
development path. According to the IMF, India’s GDP per capita using market prices and exchange rates was
just US$1,504 in 2013 while on a PPP basis it was US$4,077; the equivalent figures for China were US$6,747
and US$9,844 respectively.
But structural problems including supply-side bottlenecks in key sectors such as power and transport,
widespread corruption, bureaucratic hurdles and the lack of a transparent and disciplined policy framework
have contributed to a sharp slowdown in India’s economic growth, from above 8% to less than 5% in the last
couple of years. As a result, in the 2014 general elections, the Indian electorate, battered by high inflation and
poor economic conditions, delivered a clear mandate in favour of the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
The BJP won 282 seats of 543 in the lower house of parliament, comfortably above the 272 required for a
simple majority. Meanwhile the Congress party, which had been in power for the past ten years, suffered a
humiliating defeat. They won only 44 seats, not even crossing the 10% threshold required to form the
opposition. This marks an end to coalition politics in India for the first time since 1984. A decisive government
will speed-up decision-making at the centre and reduce political risk, although powerful state governments can
still slow the implementation of changes wrought by the national government.
With two-thirds of the population living in the countryside and more than half the labour force working in the
sector, agriculture is still a key part of the economy. However, in the eleven years to 2009 it only grew by 3.6%
pa in real terms so its share in the overall economy has fallen significantly, from 20.8% in 2002 to 13.8% in
2012. By contrast, the most dynamic sector has been the services sector, recording 9.4% annual growth
between 2002 and 2012, with major expansions in distribution, transport, communication, finance and business
services. Construction has also boomed, growing by more than 9% pa over the same period. Industry has
performed more modestly, with manufacturing recording 8% pa growth.
With the boom in the services sector helping to create a relatively affluent middle class, said to be 300m-strong,
the links between rural incomes and industrial activity have weakened. Rising incomes and increased access to
credit have led to much higher spending on consumer durables such as cars, phones and other electronic
items. However, the higher level of inflation since 2005 has particularly constrained the purchasing power of the
urban and rural poor. And if the economy is to sustain a high level of growth for several decades, it will need to
ensure that an ever-wider number of people are raised above virtual subsistence living, by increasing both
output and productivity growth in agriculture, raising educational standards and making cities more attractive to
migrants.
The 2000s saw a significant integration of the economy with the rest of the world. Exports of services (largely
software and business outsourcing) accounted for 8.5% of GDP in 2013 compared to 4.1% in 2002, while the
equivalent ratio for merchandise exports increased from 10.9% to 18.3%. Allied to this has been a sharp
increase in foreign investment in India, either in the form of FDI (despite the many bureaucratic hurdles) or in
portfolio flows.
The rapid growth in the economy in 2003-07 enabled a sharp fall in the central government budget deficit, from
5.9% of GDP in 2002/03 to 2.7% in 2007/08. However, relatively little was done during this time to widen the tax
base. The cyclical nature of the improvement in the budget over these years was shown by the speed of the
fiscal deterioration in H2 2008 as the economy slowed sharply. Indeed the fiscal deficit widened to 6.7% of GDP
in 2009/10. By 2013/14 it was down to 4.9%, but the pace of fiscal consolidation was much slower than planned
and the fiscal gap was still uncomfortably wide compared to many other emerging economies.
India
9 Economist: Nida Ali, Economist | Tel: +44 207 803 1423 | e-mail: [email protected]
12 Jun
2014
Data & Forecasts
Industrial Bank CPI CPI PPI Exports Imports Trade
production Credit Industrial
workers
Combined
rural & urban
(US$) (US$) balance
$ bn
May -2.5 14.1 10.7 9.3 4.6 0.4 5.0 -19.4
Jun -1.8 13.7 11.1 9.9 5.2 -3.8 -1.6 -11.6
Jul 2.6 14.9 10.8 9.6 5.9 11.8 -5.3 -12.6
Aug 0.4 16.7 10.7 9.5 7.0 13.9 -0.4 -10.8
Sep 2.7 17.9 10.7 9.8 7.0 12.9 -17.9 -6.4
Oct -1.2 16.6 11.1 10.2 7.2 14.3 -13.4 -10.8
Nov -1.3 14.2 11.5 11.2 7.5 3.6 -16.5 -9.7
Dec 0.1 14.5 9.1 9.9 6.4 3.7 -14.8 -10.3
2014
Jan 0.8 14.7 7.2 8.8 5.1 4.0 -18.9 -9.5
Feb -1.8 14.3 6.7 8.0 5.0 -5.1 -17.9 -8.2
Mar -0.5 14.3 6.7 8.3 5.7 -4.8 -3.4 -10.5
Apr - 14.3 7.1 8.6 5.2 5.3 -15.0 -10.1
May - - - - - 12.4 -11.4 -11.2
Key Indicators: India
Percentage changes on a year earlier unless otherwise stated
Repo Money Exchange Exchange Exchange Share Reserves Reserves
rate Supply M3 rate rate rate index price cover
% % p.a Rup/€ avg. Rup/$ avg. Trade
based
End per. $bn months
May 7.25 13.6 71.4 55.0 78.1 19760 258.5 5.8
Jun 7.25 12.7 77.1 58.4 73.8 19396 255.3 7.2
Jul 7.25 12.4 78.2 59.8 72.5 19346 252.1 6.6
Aug 7.25 12.0 84.2 63.2 68.8 18620 247.4 6.7
Sep 7.50 12.9 85.1 63.8 68.2 19380 247.9 7.2
Oct 7.75 13.5 84.1 61.6 69.8 21165 254.5 6.6
Nov 7.75 14.3 84.5 62.6 68.8 20792 263.7 7.8
Dec 7.75 14.2 84.8 61.9 69.6 21171 268.6 7.3
2014
Jan 8.00 14.2 84.6 62.1 71.1 20514 264.6 7.3
Feb 8.00 14.5 85.0 62.3 70.8 21120 266.9 8.0
Mar 8.00 13.5 84.4 61.0 72.1 22386 276.4 7.0
Apr 8.00 13.9 83.3 60.4 72.7 22418 282.0 7.9
May 8.00 13.2 81.5 59.3 74.2 24217 285.3 7.3
Financial Indicators: India
Percentage changes on a year earlier unless otherwise stated
India
10 Economist: Nida Ali, Economist | Tel: +44 207 803 1423 | e-mail: [email protected]
12 Jun
2014
INDIA TABLE 1 SUMMARY ITEMS Annual Percentage Changes, Unless Otherwise Specified
CONSUMERS TOTAL TOTAL REAL INDUSTRIAL PRIVATE GOVERNMENT WHOLE COMPETIT- PRODUCER CONSUMER
EXPENDITURE FINAL FIXED GDP PRODUCTION SECTOR BANK ECONOMY IVENESS PRICES PRICES
EXPENDITURE INVESTMENT BANK BORROWING PRODUCT- (2008=100)
CREDIT IVITY
(C) (TFE) (IF) (GDP) (IP) (BPRIV) (BGOV) (GDP/ET) (WCR) (PPI) (CPI)
YEARS BEGINNING Q1
2011 10.07 10.21 11.48 7.67 4.80 19.93 13.25 6.97 102.76 9.47 9.62 2012 5.74 6.55 2.40 4.81 0.72 16.54 15.47 3.72 91.10 7.55 9.70 2013 4.05 3.23 1.00 4.70 0.60 13.63 12.81 3.19 85.22 6.32 10.07 2014 4.73 4.47 1.56 4.51 3.12 9.47 9.51 2.77 86.08 4.95 8.44 2015 3.86 5.16 4.70 4.90 6.01 13.96 8.99 3.08 87.86 4.94 7.65 2016 7.43 6.14 6.38 6.09 6.43 13.37 9.02 4.14 86.98 4.79 6.80 2017 8.04 6.90 7.79 6.63 6.52 13.63 8.33 4.55 84.62 4.60 6.30
2011
I 11.57 10.73 7.03 9.56 7.92 21.14 8.44 9.01 104.70 9.57 9.17 II 8.11 10.27 22.91 7.63 6.98 19.81 13.29 6.99 105.64 9.61 9.63 III 8.31 9.15 11.70 7.00 3.18 23.12 14.17 6.25 104.65 9.72 9.90
IV 12.15 10.64 5.45 6.51 1.18 16.09 16.87 5.66 96.07 9.01 9.77 2012
I 8.24 9.53 10.23 5.77 0.63 17.08 15.68 4.82 96.67 7.50 8.62 II 5.04 5.47 -4.08 4.46 -0.28 18.41 16.67 3.42 90.35 7.54 10.18 III 4.74 6.30 -0.63 4.62 0.41 15.70 15.34 3.47 88.55 7.87 9.88
IV 5.07 4.89 4.44 4.38 2.09 15.15 14.27 3.14 88.82 7.29 10.07 2013
I 5.15 4.27 3.32 4.44 2.22 14.18 15.36 3.09 89.32 6.74 10.70 II 5.64 3.55 -2.80 4.66 -1.00 13.56 14.39 3.20 87.89 4.84 9.52 III 2.83 3.92 3.11 5.16 1.90 15.13 9.37 3.59 81.74 6.64 9.67
IV 2.75 1.26 0.18 4.56 -0.77 11.74 12.46 2.91 81.93 7.05 10.40 2014
I 8.23 3.78 -0.86 4.61 -0.49 9.56 11.43 2.91 83.09 5.28 8.38 II 2.96 3.73 4.61 4.60 3.68 8.33 10.06 2.87 86.87 4.91 8.60 III 4.42 4.12 1.05 4.53 3.47 7.55 8.39 2.78 87.07 4.88 8.47
IV 3.37 6.23 1.85 4.30 6.12 12.40 8.30 2.53 87.28 4.75 8.33 2015
I -0.75 5.33 4.09 4.31 6.53 13.47 8.39 2.53 87.61 4.65 8.09 II 4.62 5.09 4.40 4.67 6.11 14.58 9.12 2.86 88.02 5.04 7.78 III 5.39 5.04 4.92 5.12 5.80 13.71 9.18 3.28 88.08 5.08 7.52
IV 6.22 5.17 5.39 5.52 5.61 14.07 9.24 3.64 87.73 4.98 7.26 2016
I 6.86 5.63 5.87 5.83 5.78 13.87 9.13 3.94 87.42 4.86 7.00 II 7.31 5.98 6.21 6.02 6.25 13.50 9.13 4.10 87.34 4.81 6.87 III 7.65 6.32 6.50 6.17 6.69 13.12 8.99 4.22 86.93 4.78 6.74
IV 7.86 6.64 6.96 6.31 7.03 13.04 8.82 4.32 86.21 4.73 6.61 2017
I 8.00 6.74 7.40 6.45 6.99 13.60 8.44 4.41 85.49 4.66 6.48 II 8.07 6.87 7.75 6.58 6.67 13.55 8.41 4.50 85.25 4.62 6.35 III 8.08 6.97 8.01 6.69 6.35 13.70 8.28 4.60 84.42 4.59 6.22
IV 8.01 7.03 8.03 6.79 6.05 13.68 8.18 4.68 83.33 4.54 6.17
COPYRIGHT (C) , OXFORD ECONOMICS
INDIA TABLE 2 SUMMARY ITEMS
TRADE CURRENT CURRENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT SHORT-TERM SPREAD REAL EQUILIBRIUM EXCHANGE
BALANCE ACCOUNT ACCOUNT FINANCIAL FINANCIAL INTEREST OVER US SHORT-TERM EXCHANGE RATE PER
($ BN) ($ BN) (% OF GDP) BALANCE BALANCE RATE SHORT-TERM INTEREST RATE PER US
(RUPEES BN) (% OF GDP) RATE RATE US DOLLAR DOLLAR
(BVI$) (BCU$) (BCUR%) (GB) (GB*100 (RSH) (RSH - (Note 1) (RXEQUIL) (RXD)
/GDP!) RSH US)
YEARS BEGINNING Q1
2011 -167.4 -62.5 -3.6 -5833.5 -7.2 9.5 9.2 -0.1 51.3 46.7 2012 -201.7 -91.5 -5.3 -5334.2 -5.8 9.5 9.0 -0.2 54.4 53.5 2013 -162.6 -49.2 -2.8 -6015.8 -5.9 9.3 9.0 -0.8 58.5 58.6 2014 -162.8 -36.4 -1.9 -5125.7 -4.5 9.1 8.8 0.6 62.7 60.4 2015 -166.5 -49.8 -2.4 -5645.4 -4.4 8.1 7.6 0.4 66.7 61.5 2016 -167.8 -48.0 -2.1 -5886.0 -4.1 7.8 6.6 1.0 70.4 63.5 2017 -177.7 -43.3 -1.7 -5866.7 -3.6 7.7 5.7 1.4 73.9 65.6
2011
I -29.4 -6.0 -1.4 -2023.4 -10.0 9.6 9.3 0.4 50.3 45.3 II -44.9 -17.4 -4.0 -1626.5 -8.4 9.4 9.2 -0.2 50.9 44.7 III -44.5 -18.9 -4.4 -1181.6 -6.0 9.4 9.1 -0.5 51.6 45.8
IV -48.6 -20.2 -4.7 -1002.0 -4.6 9.6 9.1 -0.2 52.4 51.0 2012
I -51.6 -21.7 -4.8 -1287.2 -5.6 10.3 9.8 1.7 53.1 50.3 II -43.8 -16.9 -4.2 -1904.6 -8.7 9.8 9.3 -0.4 53.9 54.2 III -47.8 -21.0 -5.3 -1464.4 -6.6 9.1 8.7 -0.8 54.9 55.2
IV -58.4 -31.9 -7.0 -678.0 -2.8 8.7 8.4 -1.3 55.8 54.1 2013
I -45.6 -18.1 -3.9 -851.9 -3.4 9.2 8.9 -1.5 56.8 54.2 II -50.5 -21.8 -5.1 -2628.2 -10.9 8.5 8.2 -1.0 57.9 55.9 III -33.3 -5.2 -1.3 -1492.7 -6.0 10.3 10.0 0.6 59.0 62.1
IV -33.2 -4.2 -0.9 -1043.0 -3.8 9.3 9.0 -1.1 60.1 62.0 2014
I -30.7 -1.2 -0.3 82.4 0.3 9.6 9.3 1.2 61.2 61.8 II -43.8 -16.1 -3.6 -2689.3 -10.1 9.2 8.9 0.6 62.2 59.6 III -42.2 -4.3 -0.9 -1478.5 -5.3 9.0 8.7 0.5 63.2 60.1
IV -46.1 -14.8 -2.9 -1040.3 -3.4 8.7 8.4 0.3 64.3 60.3 2015
I -36.8 -16.8 -3.2 134.2 0.4 8.4 8.1 0.3 65.2 60.8 II -45.6 -17.3 -3.6 -2992.9 -10.0 8.2 7.8 0.4 66.2 61.3 III -40.8 -1.6 -0.3 -1646.0 -5.3 7.9 7.5 0.4 67.2 61.8
IV -43.3 -14.0 -2.5 -1140.6 -3.3 7.9 7.1 0.6 68.1 62.3 2016
I -34.7 -17.1 -3.0 216.1 0.6 7.8 6.9 0.8 69.0 62.8 II -45.6 -17.2 -3.2 -3272.5 -9.7 7.8 6.7 0.9 69.9 63.3 III -41.7 0.5 0.1 -1703.1 -4.8 7.7 6.5 1.0 70.8 63.7
IV -45.8 -14.3 -2.3 -1126.5 -2.8 7.7 6.3 1.1 71.8 64.2 2017
I -36.4 -15.8 -2.5 499.7 1.2 7.7 6.1 1.2 72.6 64.7 II -48.5 -16.2 -2.8 -3534.9 -9.2 7.7 5.8 1.3 73.5 65.2 III -44.2 3.2 0.5 -1718.2 -4.3 7.7 5.5 1.4 74.3 66.0
IV -48.6 -14.5 -2.2 -1113.4 -2.5 7.6 5.1 1.5 75.1 66.7 Note 1 : REAL INTEREST RATE = Nominal interest rate (RSH) - % change in CPI
COPYRIGHT (C) , OXFORD ECONOMICS
India
11
12 Jun 2014
Economist: Nida Ali, Economist | Tel: +44 207 803 1423 | e-mail: [email protected]
2003-2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2013-2022
GDP 7.9 6.5 9.3 7.7 4.8 4.7 4.5 4.9 6.1 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.7 6.2 6.0
Consumption 7.3 6.9 7.5 10.1 5.7 4.0 4.7 3.9 7.4 8.0 7.8 7.4 7.0 6.7 6.3 6.3
Investment 11.3 -0.7 15.2 11.5 2.4 1.0 1.6 4.7 6.4 7.8 7.9 7.2 6.9 6.8 6.9 5.7
Government Consumption 6.9 9.2 7.9 6.2 7.6 4.4 -1.4 8.1 7.4 6.7 6.2 5.9 5.6 5.5 5.5 5.4
Exports of Goods and Services 15.6 -7.7 13.8 20.8 8.3 5.3 5.2 6.4 6.4 6.0 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.3 5.5 5.7
Imports of Goods and Services 15.9 -8.3 17.8 18.2 11.6 -1.0 3.1 6.0 6.3 7.8 7.9 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.2 6.2
Unemployment (%) 12.7 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5
Consumer Prices 7.2 9.7 10.3 9.6 9.7 10.1 8.4 7.6 6.8 6.3 6.0 5.7 5.3 5.0 4.6 6.6
Current Balance (% of GDP) -1.9 -2.2 -3.6 -3.6 -5.4 -2.8 -1.9 -2.4 -2.1 -1.7 -1.7 -1.3 -1.3 -1.3 -1.3 -1.8
Exchange Rate (per $) 46.0 48.4 45.7 46.7 53.5 58.6 60.4 61.5 63.5 65.6 68.5 70.8 72.3 73.9 75.8 67.1
General Government Balance (% of GDP) -5.1 -7.4 -4.0 -7.2 -5.8 -5.9 -4.5 -4.4 -4.1 -3.6 -3.2 -2.9 -2.6 -2.5 -2.6 -3.6
Short-term Interest Rates (%) 7.4 5.5 6.3 9.5 9.5 9.3 9.1 8.1 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.5 8.0
Working Population 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.5
Labour Supply 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.8
Participation Ratio (%) 67.7 66.8 65.7 64.7 63.9 63.4 63.2 63.2 63.3 63.5 63.8 64.2 64.5 64.9 65.2 63.9
Labour productivity 6.6 5.9 8.9 7.0 3.7 3.2 2.8 3.1 4.1 4.5 4.8 4.9 5.0 4.8 4.4 4.2
Employment 1.2 0.6 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.8
Output gap (% of potential GDP) -0.1 0.1 1.0 1.4 0.0 -1.6 -2.7 -3.6 -3.5 -2.8 -2.1 -1.4 -0.9 -0.6 -0.4 -1.9
Annual percentage changes unless otherwise specified
Long-Term Forecast for India
India
12 12
12 Jun 2014
Economist: Nida Ali, Economist | Tel: +44 207 803 1423 | e-mail: [email protected]
Key Facts
PoliticsChief of state: President Pranab MUKHERJEE
Head of government: Prime Minister Narendra MODI
Political system: Federal republic
Date of next presidential election: July 2017
Date of next legislative election: 2019
Currency: Indian rupee (INR)
Long-term economic & social development1980 1990 2000 2012*
GDP per capita (US$) 271 376 455 1489
Inflation (%) 11.4 9.0 4.0 9.7
Population (mn) 699 869 1045 1249
Urban population (% of total) 23.1 25.5 27.7 31.7
Life expectancy (years) 55.4 58.5 62.2 66.0
Source : Oxford Economics & World Bank
Structure of GDP by output * 2012 or latest
2012 available year
Agriculture 17.4% Source : CIA Factbook
Industry 25.8% Location : Southern Asia, bordering the Arabian Sea and the Bay
Services 56.9% of Bengal, between Burma and Pakistan (CIA Factbook)
Source : World Bank
Long-term sovereign credit ratings & outlook Corruption perceptions index 2013Foreign currency Local currency Score
Fitch BBB- (Stable) BBB- (Stable) Developed economies (average) 74.5
Moody's Baa3 (Stable) Baa3 (Stable) Emerging economies (average) 37.3
S&P BBB- (Negative) BBB- (Negative) India 36.0
Emerging Asia 34.7
Source: Transparency International
Structural economic indicators Scoring system 100 = highly clean, 0 = highly corrupt
1990 1995 2000 2012*
Current account (US$ billion) -7.4 -5.9 -4.9 -91.5
Trade balance (US$ billion) -7.7 -10.7 -16.6 -201.7
FDI (US$ billion) 0.2 2.0 3.1 15.7
Debt service (US$ billion) 8.1 13.6 11.0 30.7
Debt service (% of exports) 34.9 34.4 17.5 6.9
External debt (% of GDP) 26.2 26.0 21.2 21.3
Oil production (000 bpd) 660 703 646 777
Oil consumption (000 bpd) 1168 1575 2127 3418
Source : Oxford Economics / World Bank / EIA
Destination of goods' exports (2012)European Union (27) 16.7%
United States 12.8%
United Arab Emirates 12.3%
China 5.1%
Singapore 4.7%
Source : WTO Source : WTO
Composition of goods & services exports,
2012
Agricultural
products
9.8%
Fuels and
mining
products
14.9%
Manufactures
41.6%
Other goods
exports
1.7%
Transportation
3.9%
Travel
4.1%
Other
commercial
services
24.0%
India