FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

20
FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

Transcript of FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

Page 1: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSISLockheed Martin Aeronautics

Elissa M. Bryan

Page 2: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

AGENDA

Overview Analysis of Problem Description of Model Analysis and Interpretation Applications

2

Page 3: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

OVERVIEW

Page 4: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS

“Which Aircraft, Which Target,

with What Weapons?”

4

Page 5: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

WHY IT MATTERS

$12k - $15k / Sortie (4th Generation Fighter)

Hostile Combat Zones

Decreased Risk of Aircraft Loss

Decreased Risk of Human Loss

5

Page 6: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

ANALYSIS OF PROBLEM

Page 7: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

DATA SETS

Aircraft Type Tough, Good, Better, Best

Weapon Load-Out Rocket, Small, Medium, Large

Target Type Soft, Medium, Hard, Very Hard

7

Page 8: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

THE CHALLENGE

Comprehensive Model Can Multiple Objectives Be Integrated? Are the Results Realistic? How Does This Affect Run-Time?

Balanced Resource Allocation: Are Resources Being Ignored? Are Resources Used to the Best of Their Ability?

8

Page 9: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

DESCRIPTION OF MODEL

Page 10: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

MODEL DESCRIPTION

Mixed Integer Program 514 Variables 114 Constraints Multiple Objective Functions

10

Page 11: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

CONSTRAINTS

Available Sorties Expected Kills Per Sortie (EKS) Available Weapons

11

Page 12: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

OPTIMIZATION

Minimizing Days in Combat Campaign Minimizing Deviation from Target Requirements

12

Page 13: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Page 14: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

BINARY CUT

10 Days: Success 5 Days: Failure 8 Days: Success 7 Days Failure

Minimum: 8 Days

14

Page 15: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

SUCCESS RATE OVER TIME

15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1040.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Success Rate Over Time

Days in Campaign

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

Ta

rge

ts H

it

Page 16: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

EFFICIENCY FRONTIER

16

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1040.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Efficiency Frontier

Days in Campaign

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

Ta

rge

ts H

it

Page 17: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

APPLICATION

Acquisition Combat Analysis / Planning Force Structure / Size

Do Different Decision Makers Value Different Variables?

17

Page 18: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

WRAPPING UP

Page 19: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

SUMMARY

Force Structure Analysis Analysis of Problem Description of Model Analysis and Interpretation Applications

19

Page 20: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan.

QUESTIONS?Thank you for your time!