(For the installation completion and hardware commissioning of the detector systems, as well

10-Nov-2008 ATLAS RRB CERN-RRB-2008-083

(For the installation completion and hardware commissioning of the detector systems, as wellas the LHC shutdown planning: see Marzio Nessi in part I)

Trigger, computing, and data preparation

Brief account on other matters- Forward detectors- Operation tasks

sLHC upgrade organization and planning

Collaboration and management

Status of completion planning

Examples of early LHC physics goals

CERN-RRB-2008-083 10th November 2008

ATLAS Progress Report (part II)

1

CERN-RRB-2008-083

Detector Operation (Run Coordinator)Detector operation during data taking, online data quality, …

Executive Board

ATLAS management: SP, Deputy SPs, RC, TCCollaboration Management, experiment execution, strategy, publications, resources, upgrades, etc.

PublicationsCommittee,Speakers Committee

CB

Trigger (Trigger Coordinator)Trigger data quality,performance, menu tables, new triggers, ..

Data Preparation (Data Preparation Coordinator)Offline data quality, first reconstruction of physics objects, calibration, alignment (e.g. with Zll data)

Computing (Computing Coordinator)SW infrastructure, GRID,data distribution, …

Physics (Physics Coordinator)optimization of algorithms for physics objects, physics channels

TMB

(Sub)-systems:Responsible for operation and calibration of their sub-detector and for sub-system specific software …

10-Nov-2008 ATLAS RRB 2

SDX1

USA15

UX15

ATLAS Trigger / DAQ Data Flow

ATLASdetector

Read-Out

Drivers(RODs) First-

leveltrigger

Read-OutSubsystems

(ROSs)

UX15

USA15

Dedicated links

Timing Trigger Control (TTC)

1600Read-OutLinks

Gig

abit

Eth

erne

t

RoIBuilder

pROSR

egio

ns O

f Int

eres

t

VME~150PCs

Data of events acceptedby first-level trigger

Eve

nt d

ata

requ

ests

Del

ete

com

man

ds

Req

uest

ed e

vent

dat

a

stores LVL2output

Event data pushed @ ≤ 100 kHz, 1600 fragments of ~ 1 kByte each

Second-leveltrigger

LVL2Super-visor

SDX1CERN computer centre

DataFlowManager

EventFilter(EF)

pROS

~ 500 ~1600

stores LVL2output

dual-CPU nodes

~100 ~30

Network switches

Event data pulled:partial events @ ≤ 100 kHz, full events @ ~ 3 kHz

Event rate ~ 200 HzData

storage

LocalStorage

SubFarmOutputs

(SFOs)

LVL2 farm

Network switches

EventBuilderSubFarm

Inputs

(SFIs)


Full Dress Rehearsal (FDR)

Played data through the computing system just as for real data from the LHC

started at point 1, like the real data processed data at CERN Tier-0, various calibration & data quality steps shipped out to the Tier-1s and Tier-2s for physics analysis

Complementary to “milestone runs” which test the real detector, but only with cosmic rays

Two “FDR runs”(February and June-July)

Were a vital preparation for processing and analysing the first LHC data

ATLAS output disk (point-1)

Tier-0 and CAF

Tier-1 and Tier-2 sites


wLCG Grid: Tier-0 and the 10 ATLAS Tier-1s

10-Nov-2008 ATLAS RRB CERN-RRB-2008-083 5

ATLAS during the Common Computing Readiness Challenge CCRC Phase 2

Data transfer Tier0--> Tiers-1

Nominal peak level (~1 GB/s) sustained over 3 days10-Nov-2008 ATLAS RRB CERN-RRB-2008-083 6

Number of world-wide ATLAS production jobs per day from 1 May to 5 September 2008


Excitement in the ATLAS Detector Control Room: The first LHC event on 10th September 2008

10-Nov-2008 ATLAS RRB

… as well as in the ATLAS Tier-0 and Data Quality Control Rooms: Reconstruction follow-up and analysis of the first LHC events


The very first beam-splashevent from the LHC in

ATLASon 10:19, 10th September

2008

Online display

Offline display10-Nov-2008 ATLAS RRB CERN-RRB-2008-083

10

A busy beam-halo event with tracks bent inthe Toroids from the start-up day (offline)

11

Beam pickupsMinimum-bias (MBTS)LUCID, BCM, etc

LVL1 System

• System is fully installed– Still large programme of work to be done to commission it with beam

• Much work done with cosmic rays, test pulses, etc• Already made good start with single beam, starting on 10th September• Some aspects of commissioning can only be done with collision data

– E.g. detailed time alignment of barrel muon trigger

CERN-RRB-2008-083 12

Timing-in the trigger

• Experiment timing currently based on beam-pickup (“BPTX”) reference

– First task of LVL1 central trigger team on 10th September was to commission the beam pickups

• Times of arrival of other triggers are being adjusted to match

– Plots show evolution from 10 to 12 September

– Timing-in for down-stream side for single beam to have similar timing to collisions

• Each LVL1 sub-system also needs to be timed in internally

– L1-calo, L1-RPC, L1-TGC, MBTS, etc

10 September

Note change of scale!

12 September


(note differentscale, also RPCnot adjusted)

High-Level Trigger

• LVL2 and Event Filter processor system installed• Full processing power will be added later

• HLT has been used routinely online– Cosmic-ray selection to enhance purity of data samples for detector studies

• E.g. data with TRT tracks

– “Dummy” algorithms performed data streaming from 10 th September

• Based on HLT examination of LVL1 trigger type

• Full set of algorithms available for collision running– Muon, electron, photon, tau, jet, MET, B-physics, etc

• Very extensive studies performed on simulated raw-data events

• Rate, efficiency and timing performance consistent with computing resources for initial running

• Also have HLT menu for commissioning LVL2 and EF in single-beam and

900 GeV collisions operations– Raw data collected in the morning of 10 th September were passed, offline, through some

algorithms during the same day

• Studies, tuning, etc. continue since then


A nice cosmic muon through the whole detector…



A huge amount of cosmicray triggers are recorded,in total (left) as well as giving tracks also in the smallest-volume detector,the Pixels (below)

CERN-RRB-2008-083


Cosmic ray data-taking with HLT L2 ID algorithms

Overall efficiency ~ 97%

HLT has been deployed for the first time, running different L2 tracking algorithms,running full ID reconstruction on L2

Examples of ID commissioning analyses

Mean x residuals (mm) of pixel barrel layer 0 (after various alignment steps)

(mm)

SCT residuals(will improve with better alignment and calibration)

Turn-on of transition radiation produced from cosmic muons


Examples of calorimeter commissioning analyses

LAr wave 15GeV cosmics

MeasuredPredictedDifference

EM cells

Precise knowledge is very importantfor an accurate calibration

Pedestal stability: LAr EM (5 month period)

1 MeV

CERN-RRB-2008-083

Examples of muon spectrometer commissioning analyses

Good correlation between MDT

and RPC

8 inner +6 middle +6 outer hits

Correlation between the momentum measurement in the muon system and in the Inner detector

RPC-MDT Correlation


Forward Detectors

LUCID at 17 mZDC at 140 mALFA at 240 m

Luminosity CerenkovIntegrating DetectorZero Degree Calorimeter

Absolute Luminosityfor ATLAS

(Phase I detectoris operational)

(Plus an internal LoI for future Forward Proton detectors at 220 and 420 mwhich is currently under internal review in the Collaboration) 21

First hits in the LUCID detectors on Sep. 10th !

Lucid with beam 1

LUCID with beam 2

MBTS

LV1C


Operation Task sharing is being put in place

A reminder of the framework:

The operation of the ATLAS experiment, spanning from detector operation to computing and data preparation, will require a very large effort across the full Collaboration (initially estimated at ~600 FTE effort per year, of which some 60% require presence at CERN)

The framework that has been approved by the Collaboration Board in February 2007 aiming at a fair sharing of these duty tasks (‘Operation Tasks’, OTs) is now being implemented and the systems andactivity areas are using a dedicated Web tool for the planning and documentation

The main elements are:

- OTs needs and accounting are reviewed and updated annually- OTs are defined under the auspices of the sub-system and activity managements- Allocations are made in two steps, expert tasks first, and then non-expert tasks

- The ‘fair share’ is proportional to the number of ATLAS authors (per Institution or Country)- Students are ‘favoured’ by a weight factor 0.75- New Institutions will have to contribute more in the first two years (weight factors 1.5 and 1.25)

Note that physics analysis tasks, and other privileged tasks, are not OTs, of course


Early experiences:

• Works well for shift planning – but some improvements needed for 2009

• Need to discuss/learn detailed assessment for all other tasks

• There are many tasks on the borderline between of duties and physics

Fractional contributions of all FundingAgencies as compared to expectation (ideally should peak around 1.0)

FTEs per month entered in the OT database as a function of the month

Note that the example plots arebased on still incomplete data

10-Nov-2008 ATLAS RRB24

CERN-RRB-2008-083

ATLAS organization to steer R&D for upgrades (recalling from earlier RRBs)

ATLAS has, in place and operational, a structure to steer its planning for future upgrades, in particular for R&D activities needed for possible luminosity upgrades of the LHC (‘sLHC’)

This is already a rather large and broad activity…

The main goals are to - Develop a realistic and coherent upgrade plan addressing the physics potential- Retain detector experts in ATLAS with challenging developments besides detector commissioning and running- Cover also less attractive (but essential) aspects right from the beginning

The organization has two major coordination bodies

Upgrade Steering Group (USG)(With representatives from systems, software, physics, and relevant Technical

Coordination areas)

Project Office (UPO)(Fully embedded within the Technical Coordination)

Upgrade R&D proposals are reviewed and handled in a transparent way within the Collaboration

There is a good and constructive synergy from common activities with CMS where appropriate


Detailed organization charts are given in the Appendix of the slides

Anticipated Peak and Integrated Luminosity

• LHC, ATLAS and CMS have agreed to use this as a basis for planning as discussed at a LHCC meeting 1 July 2008

• Sets the conditions and timescale– Phase 1 starts with 6 – 8 month shutdown end 2012

• Peak luminosity 3 x 10-34 cm-2 s-1 at end of phase 1– Phase 2 will start with an 18 month shutdown at end of 2016

• Peak 10 x 10-34 cm-2 s-1 in phase 2

• 3000 fb-1 integrated luminosity lifetime of detectors minimum in phase 210-Nov-2008 ATLAS RRB CERN-RRB-2008-083

Note that this was of course before the LHC incident, consequences have not yet been discussed

26


Overview of Upgrade


(IBL means newinsertable pixel b-layer)

Upgrade milestones and schedule


At this stage the upgrade work and planning have grown already to a substantial activity in the Collaboration

Major workshops, two recent examples: - 4th Tracker upgrade workshop at Nikhef 5-7 Nov, more than 150 participants - Joint LAr – Tile – Level1 calorimeter workshop 13-14 November

- Two global upgrade weeks are planned for 2009 for converging to an ATLAS sLHC LoI

Many ATLAS upgrade R&D projects are underway, within the internal review framework already mentioned before:

- 15 approved projects - 4 in the process of evaluation - 11 at the stage of submitted Expressions of Interests - 1 not approved (not relevant for ATLAS)

ATLAS is glad that the LHCC has also taken ‘on-board’ the task to overview sLHC activities, in order to foster a coherent planning for machine and experiments

One issue to be addressed very soon is a dedicated budget line for upgrade R&D steering, and preparing centrally for the upgrade design

29

A list of these ATLAS upgrade R&D projects is given in the Appendix of the slides

Collaboration composition

Since the RRB in April 2008 there were three formal admissions of new Institutions in the Collaboration, following the standard procedures defined in the initial Construction MoU

The Collaboration Board welcomed with unanimous votes in its July 2008 meeting theJulius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg, Germany(Muon software, computing, sLHC R&D, outreach)

Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech Republic(Fibre tracking in the forward Roman Pots)

University of Texas at Dallas, U.S.A.(Pixels, computing)

In all three cases people have already been involved in ATLAS activities for a few years

The RRB is now invited to formally endorse these new collaborating Institutions


ATLAS Collaboration

(Status October 2008)

37 Countries 169 Institutions 2800 Scientific participants total(1850 with a PhD, for M&O share)

Albany, Alberta, NIKHEF Amsterdam, Ankara, LAPP Annecy, Argonne NL, Arizona, UT Arlington, Athens, NTU Athens, Baku, IFAE Barcelona, Belgrade, Bergen, Berkeley LBL and UC, HU Berlin, Bern, Birmingham, UAN Bogota, Bologna, Bonn, Boston,

Brandeis, Bratislava/SAS Kosice, Brookhaven NL, Buenos Aires, Bucharest, Cambridge, Carleton, CERN, Chinese Cluster, Chicago, Chile, Clermont-Ferrand, Columbia, NBI Copenhagen, Cosenza, AGH UST Cracow, IFJ PAN Cracow, UT Dallas, DESY, Dortmund, TU Dresden, JINR Dubna, Duke, Frascati, Freiburg, Geneva, Genoa, Giessen, Glasgow, Göttingen, LPSC Grenoble,

Technion Haifa, Hampton, Harvard, Heidelberg, Hiroshima, Hiroshima IT, Indiana, Innsbruck, Iowa SU, Irvine UC, Istanbul Bogazici, KEK, Kobe, Kyoto, Kyoto UE, Lancaster, UN La Plata, Lecce, Lisbon LIP, Liverpool, Ljubljana, QMW London, RHBNC London, UC London, Lund, UA Madrid, Mainz, Manchester, CPPM Marseille, Massachusetts, MIT, Melbourne, Michigan, Michigan SU, Milano, Minsk NAS, Minsk NCPHEP, Montreal, McGill Montreal, RUPHE Morocco, FIAN Moscow, ITEP Moscow, MEPhI Moscow, MSU

Moscow, Munich LMU, MPI Munich, Nagasaki IAS, Nagoya, Naples, New Mexico, New York, Nijmegen, BINP Novosibirsk, Ohio SU,

Okayama, Oklahoma, Oklahoma SU, Olomouc, Oregon, LAL Orsay, Osaka, Oslo, Oxford, Paris VI and VII, Pavia, Pennsylvania, Pisa, Pittsburgh, CAS Prague, CU Prague, TU Prague, IHEP Protvino, Regina, Ritsumeikan, UFRJ Rio de Janeiro, Rome I, Rome II,

Rome III, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, DAPNIA Saclay, Santa Cruz UC, Sheffield, Shinshu, Siegen, Simon Fraser Burnaby, SLAC, Southern Methodist Dallas, NPI Petersburg, Stockholm, KTH Stockholm, Stony Brook, Sydney, AS Taipei, Tbilisi, Tel Aviv,

Thessaloniki, Tokyo ICEPP, Tokyo MU, Toronto, TRIUMF, Tsukuba, Tufts, Udine/ICTP, Uppsala, Urbana UI, Valencia, UBC Vancouver, Victoria, Washington, Weizmann Rehovot, FH Wiener Neustadt, Wisconsin, Wuppertal, Würzburg, Yale, Yerevan

ATLAS OrganizationOctober 2008

ATLAS Plenary Meeting

Collaboration Board(Chair: K. Jon-AndDeputy: C. Oram)

Resources ReviewBoard

Spokesperson(P. Jenni

Deputies: F. Gianottiand S. Stapnes)

Technical Coordinator

(M. Nessi)

Resources Coordinator(M. Nordberg)

Executive Board

CB Chair AdvisoryGroup

Inner Detector(L. Rossi)

Tile Calorimeter(B. Stanek)

Magnet System(H. ten Kate)

ComputingCoordination

(D. Barberis,D. Quarrie)

Data Prep.Coordination

(C. Guyot)

LAr Calorimeter(I. Wingerter-Seez)

Muon Instrumentation

(L. Pontecorvo)

Trigger/DAQ( C. Bee,

L. Mapelli)

ElectronicsCoordination

(P. Farthouat)

PhysicsCoordination

(D. Charlton)

AdditionalMembers

(T. Kobayashi,M. Tuts, A. Zaitsev)

Commissioning/Run Coordinator

(T. Wengler)

TriggerCoordination

(N. Ellis)

32


ATLAS will undergo important leadership changes early next year(Based on elections and appointments during the last two Collaboration Board meetings)

Management as from 1st March 2009:

Spokesperson Fabiola Gianotti (CERN)

Deputy Spokespersons Dave Charlton (Birmingham)Andy Lankford (UC Irvine)

Technical Coordinator Marzio Nessi (CERN)Resources Coordinator Markus Nordberg (CERN)

Collaboration Board as from 1st January 2009:

CB Chairperson Kerstin Jon-And (Stockholm)CB Deputy Chairperson Gregor Herten (Freiburg)

33

Updated Financial Overview

Financial frameworkInitial Construction MoU 1995 475 MCHFUpdated construction baseline 468.4 MCHFAdditional Cost to Completion (accepted in RRB October 2002) 68.2 MCHF based on the Completion Plan (CERN-RRB-2002-114)Additional CtC identified in 2006 and detailed in CERN-RRB-2006-069) 4.4 MCHFTotal costs for the initial detector 541.1 MCHF

Missing funding at this stage for the initial detector:Baseline Construction MoU, mainly Common Fund 7.2 MCHF(of which 4.0 MCHF are in progress of being paid, and 3.2 MCHF remain at risk)

2002 Cost to Completion (CC and C&I) calculated shares 9.2 MCHF(of which 2.8 MCHF are in progress of being paid, and assuming that the U.S. will provide their remaining 4.5 MCHF on a best effort basis,1.9 MCHF remain at risk)

Note for planning purposes that the following items are not included: - There occurred almost 2 MCHF additional manpower costs because of the delays in the LHC start-up; as already mentioned previously, these were partially covered elsewhere, not all CtC against HLT deferrals- No provisions against future ‘force majeure’ costs- Re-scoping of the design-luminosity detector, estimated material costs of parts not included in present initial detector (CERN-RRB-2002-114) 20 MCHF- Forward detectors parts (luminosity) not fully funded yet 1.5 MCHF

ATLAS gratefully appreciates that CERN has already secured its contribution tore-scope the detector for its TDR design-luminosity capabilities in the coming 2 years 34


Cost to Completion, and initial staged detector configuration

As a reminder from previous RRB meetings:

The Cost to Completion (CtC) is defined as the sum of Commissioning and Integration (C&I) pre-operation costs plus the Construction Completion (CC) cost in addition to the deliverables

The following framework was accepted at the October 2002 RRB (ATLAS Completion Plan, CERN-RRB-2002-114rev.):

CtC 68.2 MCHF (sum of CC = 47.3 MCHF and C&I = 20.9 MCHF)

Commitments from Funding Agencies for fresh resources (category 1) 46.5 MCHFFurther prospects, but without commitments at this stage (category 2) 13.6 MCHF

The missing resources, 21.7 MCHF, have to be covered by redirecting resources from staging and deferrals

The funding situation will be reviewed regularly at each RRB, and is expected to evolve as soonas further resources commitments will become available

The physics impact of the staging and deferrals was discussed in detail with the LHCC

It was clearly understood that the full potential of the ATLAS detector will need to be restoredfor the high luminosity running, which is expected to start only very few years after turn-on of the LHC, and to last for at least a decade

CERN-RRB-2008-083 35

Cost to Completion Funding (kCHF)

(Status CERN-RRB-2008-08231st October 2008)


Funding Agency Member New funding New funding CtC 2006(CtC) Fee 2004-6 (category 1) requests proposed

(incl. in CC) incl. Member F (category 2) sharingTotal CC C&I Total Total Total

Argentina 75Armenia 66 48 18 38 45Australia 357 242 115 75 357Austria 67 52 15 38 80Azerbaijan 43 38 5 38 38Belarus 85 75 10 75 75Brazil 64 47 17 38 41Canada 2090 1528 562 263 2090Chile 38China NSFC+MSTC 141 99 42 38 141Colombia 38Czech Republic 316 196 120 113 316Denmark 422 290 132 38 118 304France IN2P3 5890 4176 1714 225 5890France CEA 1940 1379 561 38 1940Georgia 42 37 5 38 42Germany BMBF 4531 3250 1281 338 4531Germany DESY 38Germany MPI 1093 761 332 38 1093Greece 261 173 88 113 261Israel 739 497 242 113 739Italy 6638 4650 1988 450 6288Japan 4362 3029 1333 563 4362Morocco 57 47 10 38 42Netherlands 1934 1368 566 75 1934Norway 581 391 190 75 581Poland 136 94 42 75 136Portugal 446 265 181 38 339 107Romania 140 85 55 38 140Russia 2991 1995 996 263 1759JINR 1066 660 406 38 521Serbia 300Slovak Republic 72 53 19 38 82Slovenia 223 152 71 38 223Spain 1706 1109 597 113 1706Sweden 1691 1121 570 150 1691Switzerland 2372 1701 671 75 2372Taipei 445 318 127 38 445Turkey 85 75 10 75 75United Kingdom 4387 3063 1324 450 4387US DOE + NSF (1) 12245 8438 3807 1238 12245CERN 8452 5770 2682 38 9300 4400

Total 68176 47272 20904 5563 66839 411 4400

(1) The remaining 4.5 MCHF to C&I is provided on a best effort basis New funding requests as prospects (category 2) are without firm commitment from the Funding Agencies

Cost to Completion 2002

calculated share

36

All CtC contributions as requested in 2002 are needed to completethe payments for theinitial detector configuration

(And in that case ATLASwill also manage to coverthe CtC – 2 reportedin 2006 thanks to the larger share contributedby CERN)

Example of early physics: Top without / with b-tagging

Large cross section: ~ 830 pb

Reconstructed mass distribution after simple selection of tt Wb Wb ℓb qqb decays:

ATLAS100 pb-1

after b-tag and W-mass selection

ATLAS100 pb-1

• Cross section measurement (test of perturbative QCD) with data corresponding to 100 pb-1 possible with an accuracy of ±10-15%

• Errors are dominated by systematics (jet energy scale, Monte Carlo modeling (ISR, FSR),…)

• Ultimate reach (100 fb-1): ± 3-5% (limited by uncertainty on the luminosity) 37

1 fb-1

m(ll) GeV

Z’ → e+e- with SM-like couplings (ZSSM)

Discovery reach above Tevatron limitsm ~ 1 TeV perhaps already in 2009... (?)

Mass Events / fb-1 Luminosity needed (TeV) (after cuts) for a 5s discovery + (10 obs. events)

1 ~160 ~70 pb-1

1.5 ~30 ~300 pb -1

2 ~7 ~1.5 fb-1

ATLAS Preliminar

y

Example of an early surprise:


Search for Higgs Bosons Standard Model H → ZZ(*) → ℓℓ ℓℓ

L = 10 fb-1

Charged Higgs boson in Supersymmetry (MSSM) gb t H+ jjb

L = 30 fb-1

ATLAS

tan = 35


Search for Supersymmetric Particles

ATLAS reach for (equal) Squark- and Gluino masses: 0.1 fb-1 M ~ 750 GeV 1 fb-1 M ~ 1350 GeV 10 fb-1 M ~ 1800 GeV

Deviations from the Standard Model due to SUSY at the TeV scale can be detected fast !

L = 1 fb-1


(Tevatron reach typically 400 GeV)

40

Conclusions


The project proceeded within the framework of the accepted 2002 Completion Plan

All the resources requested in that framework are needed to cover the costs of the initial detector now installed (this will also cover the additional CtC costs as reported in 2006)

The experiment (detector hardware, trigger and DAQ, data distribution for distributedanalyses, data preparation which includes quality monitoring, calibrations and alignments …) was ready for the LHC start-up in September

With the first LHC beam-induced events, and the long cosmic ray data taking period,ATLAS has demonstrated readiness for exploiting the LHC data

The worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG) is the essential backbone for the ATLASdistributed computing resources needed for the Analysis Model

ATLAS is on track for the eagerly awaited LHC physics

(ATLAS expects to remain at the energy frontier of HEP for the next 10 -15 years, and the Collaboration has set in place a coherent organization to evaluate and plan for upgrades in order to exploit future LHC machine high-luminosity upgrades)

41


Appendices

Upgrade organization charts

List of upgrade R&D projects

Initial physics reach comparison for 10 vs 14 TeV

Upgrade Organisation - overall


Organisation - Steering Group


Organisation - Project office and review office


CERN-RRB-2008-083

Updated list of ATLAS sLHC R&D proposals (3 slides for reference)

46

Appendix: Physics reach for 10 vs 14 TeV

At 10 TeV, more difficult to create high mass objects...

Below about 200 GeV, this suppression is <50% (process dependent )

e.g. tt ~ factor 2 lower cross-section

Above ~2-3 TeV the effect is more marked

The plots of the talk are for √s=14 TeV

James Stirling


(For the installation completion and hardware commissioning of the detector systems, as well

Documents

Transcript of (For the installation completion and hardware commissioning of the detector systems, as well