FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two...

27
Page 1 of 27 PUBLIC SUMMARY RECERTIFICATION AUDIT (3 rd CYCLE) ON PAHANG FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION Certificate Number: FMC-NF 00008 Date of First Certification: 1 st June 2010 Audit Date: 25 th February 1 st March 2019 Date of Public Summary: 11 th June 2019 Certification Body: SIRIM QAS International Sdn. Bhd. Block 4, SIRIM Complex No. 1, Persiaran Dato’ Menteri Section 2, 40700 Shah Alam Selangor MALAYSIA Tel : 60-3-5544 6400/5544 6448 Fax : 60-3 5544 6763 Website : www.sirim-qas.com.my

Transcript of FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two...

Page 1: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 1 of 27

PUBLIC SUMMARY RECERTIFICATION AUDIT (3rd CYCLE) ON

PAHANG FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION

Certificate Number: FMC-NF 00008 Date of First Certification: 1st June 2010 Audit Date: 25th February – 1st March 2019 Date of Public Summary: 11th June 2019

Certification Body: SIRIM QAS International Sdn. Bhd. Block 4, SIRIM Complex No. 1, Persiaran Dato’ Menteri Section 2, 40700 Shah Alam Selangor MALAYSIA Tel : 60-3-5544 6400/5544 6448 Fax : 60-3 5544 6763 Website : www.sirim-qas.com.my

Page 2: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 2 of 27

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 3 2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Name of FMU ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Contact Person and Address .................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 General Background on the Pahang FMU ............................................................................................. 4 2.4 Date First Certified .................................................................................................................................. 4 2.5 Location of the FMU ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.6 Forest Management System ................................................................................................................... 4 2.7 Annual Allowable Cut/Annual Harvest under the Forest Management Plan .......................................... 4 2.8 Environmental and Socioeconomic Context ........................................................................................... 4

3 AUDIT PROCESS ...................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Audit Dates ............................................................................................................................................. 5 3.2 Audit Team.............................................................................................................................................. 5 3.3 Standard Used ........................................................................................................................................ 5 3.4 Stakeholder Consultations ...................................................................................................................... 5 3.5 Audit Process .......................................................................................................................................... 5

4 SUMMARY OF AUDIT FINDINGS ............................................................................................................. 6

Attachments

Map of Pahang FMU ....................................................................................................................................... 12 Experiences and Qualifications of Audit Team Members ............................................................................... 13 Recertification Audit Plan ................................................................................................................................ 15 Details on NCRs and OFIs Raised During this Recertification Audit and Corrective Actions Taken .............. 18 Corrective Actions Taken and Final Status on NCRs and OFIs Raised During Previous Audit ..................... 24

Page 3: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 3 of 27

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This recertification audit on the Pahang Forest Management Unit (hereafter referred as the (Pahang FMU) was conducted on 25th February- 1st Mach 2019 to assess the continued compliance of the overall forest management system of the Pahang FMU against the requirements of the Malaysian Criteria and Indicators for Forest Management Certification (Natural Forest) [MC&I (Natural Forest)] using the verifiers stipulated for Peninsular Malaysia. The scope of this surveillance 1 audit was limited to the forest management system and practices on the Permanent Reserved Forest (PRF) within the Pahang FMU. This recertification audit was conducted by a 4 -member team comprising 1. Khairul Najwan bin Ahmad Jahari (Lead Auditor), 2. Mohd Razman bin Salim (Auditor), 3. Ismail Adnan Abdul Malek (Auditor), 4. Dr. Zahid Emby (Sociologist). Based on the findings of this recertification audit, it was found that Pahang FMU had continued to comply with the requirements of the MC&I (Natural Forest). This recertification audit had resulted in the issuance of 5 (five) minor Non Conformity Reports (NCRs) respectively. In addition, 2 (two) Observation for Improvements (OFIs) were raised. This public summary contains the general information on the Pahang FMU, the findings of the recertification audit, NCRs raised as well as the decision on the continued certification of the FMU.

Page 4: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 4 of 27

2 INTRODUCTION

2.1 Name of FMU

Pahang Forest Management Unit 2.2 Contact Person and Address

Name: Dato Dr Mohd Hizamri bin Mohd Designation: State Forestry Director

Address: Pahang State Forestry Department

Tingkat 5 Kompleks Tun Razak,

Bandar Indera Mahkota,

25990 Kuantan, Pahang.

Phone #: 609-5732911

Fax #: +609-5736152

2.3 General Background on the Pahang FMU

Pahang FMU is managed by the Pahang State Forestry Department (PSFD), is located within Lat 40 34’ 38’’; Long 1010 10’ 38’’ and Lat 20 26’ 20’’; Long 1030 56’ 18’’. It comprised of 1,504,407.35 hectares of PRF of the state’s total land area of 3,596,500 hectares. The PSFD is committed in the management of the FMU on a sustainable basis. The FMU consists of a total of 998,671.32 ha of production forests and 561,603.3 ha of protection forests (water catchment, soil protection, soil reclamation, etc.). The administration of the FMU had been divided into 7 forest districts. The Forest District of Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management System (SMS) on a 30 -year rotation period. Under the Eleventh Malaysia Plan 2016- 2020, the Annual Allowable Cut (AAC) for the Pahang FMU had been set at 68,435 ha or 13,687 ha per year. A Forest Management Plan (FMP) covering the period from 2016 to 2025 had been presented during the audit. A map of the FMU showing the significant features of the forest is attached in Attachment 1.

2.4 Date First Certified

1st June 2010

2.5 Location of the FMU

The FMU is located between 2º 27’ 21.34” N to 4º 27’ 21.34” N and 101º21’ 54.54” E to 103º 37’ 29.21” E

2.6 Forest Management System

The FMU had followed the principles of sustainable forest management (SFM) and the requirements of the Licence Agreement of the State government. A Forest Management Plan (FMP) 2016 to 2025 was presented during this audit.

2.7 Annual Allowable Cut/Annual Harvest under the Forest Management Plan

For the Eleventh Malaysia Plan (2016-2020), the Annual Allowable Cut (AAC) for the FMU had been set at 68,435 ha or 13,687 ha per year; the highest in Peninsular Malaysia.

2.8 Environmental and Socioeconomic Context

The existing macro-EIA developed is still relevant since there were no significant changes on the forest management system and harvesting system (SMS). The FMP 2016-2025 has adopted the mitigation

Page 5: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 5 of 27

measures as recommended in the macro-EIA (PHN.PHG.(PEM)118/107). The mitigation measures were verified in the FMP 2016-2025 in Chapter 6: Preskripsi Pengurusan Hutan. The EIA was found adequate to address the impacts on endangered, rare and threatened (ERT) species of flora and fauna. Additionally, the Pahang FMP (2016-2025) also take into consideration the biological corridors (CFS) that was planned and implemented in the FMU with the size of 121,910.53 ha involving six primary linkages and three secondary linkages The customary use rights of the Orang Asli within the PRF were respected in forest management planning and implementation in accordance to the Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954. There was no indigenous people’s land inside the PSFD certified area. Traditional forest-related knowledge and practices of indigenous people in the use of forest species or management systems in forest operations was not used by the PSFD. However the PSFD has established framework for possible utilisation of such traditional knowledge, entitled ‘Compensation Mechanism for The Utilisation of Traditional Knowledge and Practices of Orang Asli’.

3 AUDIT PROCESS 3.1 Audit Dates

25 February – 1 March 2019/ 24 auditor days

3.2 Audit Team

1. Khairul Najwan bin Ahmad Jahari (Lead Auditor)

2. Mohd Razman bin Salim (Forester)

3. Ismail Adnan Abdul Malik (Forester)

4. Dr. Zahid Emby (Sociologist)

The details on the experiences and qualifications of the audit team members are as in Attachment 2.

3.3 Standard Used

Malaysian Criteria and Indicators for Forest Management Certification (Natural Forest) [MC&I (Natural Forest)] using the verifiers stipulated for Peninsular Malaysia.

3.4 Stakeholder Consultations

A stakeholder consultation was conducted in January 2019 for a period of one month. However, there were no comments received from the stakeholders.

3.5 Audit Process

The audit was conducted primarily to evaluate the level of continued compliance of the Pahang FMU’s current documentation and field practices in forest management with the detailed of the standard of performances (SOPs) listed in the MC&I (Natural Forest), using the verifiers stipulated for Peninsular Malaysia.

For each Indicator, the auditors had conducted either a documentation review, consultation with the relevant personnel of the FMU, local community or stakeholders or field audit or a combination of these methods. Depending on the compliance with the verifiers for a particular indicator, the auditors then decided on the degree of the FMU’s overall compliance with the indicator and decided whether or not to issue a major or minor NCR or an OFI which is defined as follows:

(i) a major NCR is a non-compliance with the requirements of the MC&I (Natural Forest);

(ii) a minor NCR is a deviation or a lapse in complying with the requirements of the MC&I (Natural Forest); and

Page 6: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 6 of 27

(iii) an OFI is a situation where the auditor has noted an area of concern on the capability of the forest management system to achieve conformance to the requirements of the MC&I (Natural Forest) but without sufficient objective evidence to support a non-conformance.

The audit team had conducted an onsite consultation with the relevant stakeholders such as Department of Environmental (DOE), Wildlife Department (PERHILITAN), The Malay uniformed staffs were also members of the union, ‘Kesatuan Pegawai-Pegawai Hutan Melayu Semenanjung Malaysia’ (KPHMSM) (Peninsular Malaysia’s Malay Foresters Union), Pahang State and District JAKOA officers, villagers and leaders of Malay communities (Kg Batu 6/Sg Kolek, Kg Kuala Kenau, Kg FELCRA Sg Temau) and Orang Asli (namely the Orang Asli villages of Kg Sg Mas, Kg Sg Kiol, Kg Sematau, Kg Karang, Kg Kabang/Pos Betau, Kg Sg Gabong) during the audit. The coverage of this surveillance audit is as shown in the surveillance Audit Plan in Attachment 3.

The PSFD had sent a corrective action plan to the audit team to address the minor NCRs which the audit team had reviewed and accepted them. The audit team had prepared an interim recertification audit report and sent it to the PSFD for comment. A second draft recertification audit report which had incorporated the comments received from the PSFD was then prepared and sent to two peer reviewers for independent reviewing. A final recertification audit was prepared after incorporating the comments from peer reviewers.

4 SUMMARY OF AUDIT FINDINGS

Based on the findings of this recertification audit, it was found that the PSFD had continued to manage the Pahang FMU in compliance with most of the requirements of the MC&I (Natural Forest). This recertification had resulted in the issuance of 5 (five) minor NCRs and 2 (one) OFIs. The details on the NCRs/OFIs raised are shown in Attachment 4.

The audit team had reviewed and accepted the PSFD’s proposed corrective actions to address the 5 (five) minor NCRs. However, these corrective actions shall be verified by the audit team during the next audit.

The audit team had also verified on the corrective actions taken by the PSFD to address the 4 (four) Minor NCRs and 1 (1) OFIs which were raised during the previous audit. The responses made by the audit team leader on these corrective actions and on the final status of the NCRs and OFIs are as in Attachment 5.

On indigenous peoples’ rights, there were mechanisms in place to resolve disputes over tenure and use rights through meetings held with the Department of Orang Asli Development or Jabatan Kemajuan Orang Asli (JAKOA). It was observed that there was no recorded civil court case pertaining to legal or customary tenure or use rights filed against the PSFD. With regard to Criterion 6.10, at the time of this Recertification Audit (2019), the PRF converted to forest plantation and other uses in Pahang FMU was at 46,141.65 ha,about 3.06% of total PRF. The conversion rate of the PRF within the FMU complied with the 2.5% (first 3 years), 1.5% (subsequent 2 years) and 1% (subsequent years) “limited portion” guideline in Indicator 6.10.1. As the is no major NCR raised during this recertification audit, the audit team had therefore recommended that the Certificate for Forest Management be maintained.

Page 7: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 7 of 27

The summary on the findings of the recertification audit on the Pahang FMU against the requirements of the MC&I (Natural Forest) are as follows:

Principle Strengths Weaknesses

Principle 1 Compliance With Laws and Principles

All relevant national and local laws and regulations and policies related to forest management were up-dated. These documents were also made available at the District Forest Offices. Senior Forest Officers of PSFD had demonstrated good understanding and awareness of all respective applicable federal, state and local laws, as well as the regulatory framework for forest management. They were also found to be aware of all the binding international agreements. There were detailed records of violations of the National Forestry Act by logging contractors and the public maintained in the District Forestry Offices and in the Head Office in Kuantan. The current list and documents pertaining to all legally prescribed fees, royalties, taxes, and other charges were presented during the audit. Identification of conflicts between existing laws, regulations and Principles and Criteria of the MC&I had been discussed in meetings organized by the he Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia Head Quarters in Kuala Lumpur. Encroachment, illegal harvesting, hunting, settlement, and other unauthorised activities in the certified PRFs area had been controlled by the PSFD.

There was no negative finding

Principle 2 Tenure and Use Rights and Responsibilities

Permanent Reserve Forest gazettement documents were available in the main PSFD office. Forest managers had continued to recognise, respect and collaborate with holders of duly recognised legal or customary tenure or use rights of the of orang asli.The orang asli freely access the forest and collect forest resources for home consumption but not for commercial purposes. There were mechanisms available for resolving disputes. In addition, the PSFD had established a joint consultative committee with the Department of Orang Asli Development or Jabatan Kemajuan Orang Asli (JAKOA).

There was no negative finding

Principle 3 Indigenous People’s Rights

The customary use rights of the Orang Asli within the PRF were respected in forest management planning and implementation in accordance to the Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954. There was no evidence of significant conflict or

There was no negative finding

Page 8: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 8 of 27

Principle Strengths Weaknesses

grievance as verified through interviews with JAKOA and Orang Asli villagers during the Audit. Appropriate procedures for identification and protection of sites of special cultural, ecological, economic or religious significance to the Orang Asli had been established.

Principle 4 Community Relations and Workers’ Rights

There is a central training centre at Pusat Latihan Perhutanan Pahang at Belimbing with facilities for the training programs of the FMU. Training was planned and conducted annually according to set programme for both Forest Department and Companies officers and staff. There were records to confirm that people in communities living within, or adjacent to, the FMU were given preference for employment and contract works. All staff of the PSFD enjoyed the full benefits of medical care, SOCSO and the Employee Provident Fund. A Safety and Health Officer (SHO) has been officially appointed by the Pahang State Director of Forestry. A Safety and Health Committee (Jawatankuasa ‘Keselamatan dan Kesihatan Pekerja-Pekerja’) has been established with members appointed comprising of all relevant staff and officers of the PSFD. The “Kesatuan Pegawai-Pegawai Hutan Melayu Semenanjung Malaysia” (Association of Uniformed Staff) PSFD Branch was responsible for protecting the welfare of uniformed workers

The social impact assessment form (Form E) has no section for DFO’s comments and as such the DFO is not able to comment on the results of the evaluation.Therefore an OFI for indicator 4.4.1 was raised.

During social impact assessment (Form E – Before and During) carried out at licence CL-01-13-18 KP Ulu Jelai PRF Compt 260, 262, 263, the Chairman and a community representative of Kg Kuala Koyan, Kuala Lipis raised some issues in the social impact assessment. However, no evidence that actions were taken to resolve issues raised by respondents in the social impact assessment.Therefore a Minor NCR ZE01/2019 for Indicator 4.4.2 was raised.

Principle 5 Benefits From the Forest

Investments and reinvestments were made by PSFD in forest management, including aspects of forest administration, research, human resource development, protection, economy, conservation, environment and social. Timber was the main product being extracted from the forest in the FMU. All harvesting had been conducted through the application of Guidelines for Reduced Impact Logging in Peninsular Malaysia and followed by post harvesting practices. The PSFD had promoted the development of non-timber forest resources such as nibong, rattan, bamboo. Licenses were given to orang asli for the removal of rattan and bamboo. Guidelines and/or procedures were implemented to identify and demarcate sensitive areas for the protection of soil and water, watercourses and

1. During site inspection at Compt. 81, Tekam PRF (CJ-01-60-18(KP)), auditor has found one Meranti Tembaga tree stump with DBH 53 cm and without tree tag at LP15/1, Matau 6 was felled.

2. Inspection at LP4/5, Matau 15

at Compt. 81, Tekam PRF (CJ-01-60-18(KP)), auditor has found tree tag no. OK6794/T attached to a Kelat tree (DBH 75 cm), however, another tree tag with same tag no. (OK6794) was attached to a Meranti Nemesu with DBH 80 cm.

3. Inspection at LP19/1, Compt 40, Tekai Tembeling PRF (CJ-

Page 9: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 9 of 27

Principle Strengths Weaknesses

wetlands. Harvesting rates in Pahang FMU were determined by the annual allowable cut (AAC) set in the FMP and in the 11th Malaysia Plan for the amount 13,687 ha a year or a total of 68,435 ha over the five year duration in the plan (2016-2020).

01-53-18 (KP) found one felled Pelong tree was without tree tag attached to the logs.

Therefore, Minor NCR

KN01/2019 for Indicator 5.3.1 was raised.

Principle 6 Environmental Impact

The Macro Environmental Impact Assessment (MEIA) prepared by the Pahang State Forestry Department for the FMU was presented during the Audit. There was continuous cooperation between forest managers, conservation organizations and regulatory authorities on implementing conservation and management activities. Hunting and collecting activities had been strictly controlled within the FMU. Harvesting was designed in the FMU taking into consideration the need for the conservation of biological corridors and buffer zones for features of special biological interest for wildlife. Pahang FMU has in total 20 VJRs that covered a total of 2,922.09 ha. VJR represents undisturbed natural forests ecosystems. Harvesting operations in the FMU were conducted based on the requirements of the Guidelines for Reduced Impact Logging in Peninsular Malaysia 2003 and the Forest Road Guidelines 2010 (Amended 2013) to reduce soil compaction. PSFD had established standard operating procedures on waste disposal and re-cycling of liquid and solid non-organic wastes and records of disposal of containers, liquid and solid non-organic wastes, including fuel and oil. No HCVF areas were converted to other forest land use.

During the inspection of License CL-01-19-18 (KP), Compartment 269, Hulu Jelai PRF, near LP 52/1 matau 11, the stream buffer (10m wide) was marked in the harvesting map, however, it was not demarcated at the site. Therefore, a Minor NCR MRS01/2019 for indicator 6.5.4 was raised.

The licensee for plantation area (TLC and rubber) has submitted the monitoring report as per EIA requirements to DOE. However, the record was not circulated to the FMU after submission to DOE. Therefore, an OFI for Indicator 6.10.1 was raised.

Principle 7 Management Plan

The Forest Management Plan (FMP) 2016 - 2025 was made available at Bukit Sekilau Office in Kuantan, Pahang. It had incorporated all the items listed from a) to i) in Criterion 7.1).PSFD has maintained its harvesting system with additional of reduce impact logging (RIL) system as stated in the FMP. PSFD has adequate training facilities for staff and Forest Contractor’s staff in the main campus at PLPP Belimbing in Pahang State. Every staff of the department undergoes a series of courses throughout their career and passing

1. The FMU did not conduct training on scheduled waste management to scheduled waste operator.

2. Annual training programme for

year 2019 did not cover topic on scheduled waste management / ‘SOP Bagi Pelupusan Sisa Pepejal dan Cecair Bukan Organik Berdasarkan Keperluan Kualiti Alam Sekitar’.

Therefore, Minor NCR

Page 10: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 10 of 27

Principle Strengths Weaknesses

some of these are made mandatory to their promotion and advancement. A summary of the primary elements of the Forest Management Plan 2016-2025 was updated in the Pahang Forestry Department official website http://forestry.pahang.gov.my/download/MC&I/RINGKASAN-EKSEKUTIF.pdf

MRS03/2019 for Indicator 7.3.2 was raised

Principle 8 Monitoring and Assessment

The PSFD had continued to use the monitoring forms A – D, [A: Infrastructure, B: Forest Harvesting, C: Environment, D: Output] for assessing social, ecological, environmental and economic impacts of forest operations. The PSFD management has appropriately included all relevant information needed to monitor items listed in (a) to (e) of Criterion 8.2. Growth plots which had been established in the FMU were enumerated on a regular basis by the staff from the Forestry Department Headquarters Peninsular Malaysia in Kuala Lumpur with the assistance of PSFD. All logs transported out of the forest in the FMU will be issued with a delivery order prepared by the logging contractor where the tree number, species, log production number, log length, diameter, and net volume are documented. The Removal Pass is a controlled legal document, the issuance of which is assigned only to a designated Forester. The logs are only allowed to be transported out of the FMU when a Removal Pass has been issued. The PSFD has incorporated the results from monitoring activities on HCVFs and scientific research into the Forest Management Plan 2016-2025. A comprehensive write-up including the summary of the finding for growth plot from 1992-2007 (15 years) based on the data collected and could be found in this link http://forestry.pahang.gov.my/download/analysis_of_growth.pdf

1. During the inspection of the records for license CL-01-19-18 (KP), Compartment 269, Hulu Jelai PRF, it was observed that logs that were transported out as written in the Removal Passes CKPB 482188 (items species, log diameters and lengths) were not documented as “removed logs” in the Tree Tagging Book.

2. Visit to Compt 269, Ulu Jelai PRF (CL-01-19-18 (KP) found a felled Kedondong tree (OV6219/T, 64cm) was not recorded in the Tree Tagging Book.

Therefore Minor NCR MRS02/2019 on Indicator 8.3.1 was raised

Principle 9 Maintenance of High Conservation Values

PSFD had established and continues to maintain the 5 HCVF sites as follows:

• Rafflesia plot at Compartment 11, Gunong Benom Forest Reserve,

• Meranti Mengkai (Shorea Bentongensis) at Compartment 13, 14 & 59, Lentang Forest Reserve,

• Padang Tujuh Kerangas ecosystem at the Endau-Rompin State Park

• Berus Mata Buaya (Bruguiera hainessii) at the Pontian Mangrove Forest Reserve in Rompin

• Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longofolia) stand at

There was no negative finding.

Page 11: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 11 of 27

Principle Strengths Weaknesses

Compartment 1, HSK Paya Pasir, Temerloh.

There was documented evidence of consultations being held with the local communities on the option to maintain or enhance all of the HCVFs sites in the FMU. Measures to demarcate, maintain and enhance HCVF attributes had been documented in the Pahang FMP (2016-2025) and well implemented on the ground. The PSFD’s web page provided information on HCVFs accessible at; http://forestry.pahang.gov.my/index.php/info-perhutanan/mc-i/hcvf Periodic monitoring was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the measures employed to maintain or enhance the applicable conservation attributes in the HCVFs.

Page 12: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 12 of 27

Attachment 1

Map of Pahang FMU

Page 13: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 13 of 27

Attachment 2

Experiences and Qualifications of Audit Team Members

Assessment Team

Role/Area of MC&I

Requirement Qualification and Experience

Khairul Najwan Ahmad Jahari

Audit Team Leader / Forester

Academic Qualification: B.Sc. of Forestry (Forest Management), Universiti Putra Malaysia. Work Experience: Appointed as contract Research Officer in the Natural Forest Division, Forest Research Institute of Malaysia (FRIM), since 2001. Conduct and coordinate a research on 8th Malaysian Plan Project. Produce technical reports, meeting, seminar and conferences reports as well as quarterly physical and financial reports. Coordinate and participate field works, multi-level meetings, seminars, conferences and workshops. Spent some time in other existing FRIM projects (inter divisional) as an organizing committee member, division level activities and projects. Currently as Lead Auditor at the Food, Agriculture and Forestry Section (FAF), SIRIM QAS International, since 2009. Involved in conducting assessments on forest management certification (MC&I and FSC P&C), MYNI of RSPO P&C and other management system on ISO 9001, 14001 and OHSA 1800 Training / Research Areas: Was attending and pass in the following training programs: Auditor Training Course on Malaysian Criteria and Indicators for Forest Management Certification [MC&I (2002)] organized by MTCC, 30 March - 2 April 2009. EMS 14001: 2004 Lead Auditor Course organized by SIRIM Training Services Sdn Bhd, 2-6 March 2009. OHSAS 18001: 2007 Lead Auditor Course organized by SIRIM Training Services Sdn Bhd, 23-27 Feb 2009. QMS 9001: 2008 Lead Auditor Course organized by SIRIM Training Services Sdn Bhd, 16 – 21 Feb 2009.

Ismail Adnan Malek

Assessment Team Leader / Forester

Academic Qualification: Master of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Canada Work Experience: One year (1974-1975) experience as Sub Assistant Conservator of Forest at the Pahang Forest Department, involved with Forest Administration/Management and Enforcement. Next, seven years (1979-1986) experience as Forest Officer/Logging Superintendent at Syarikat Jengka Sdn. Bhd (SJSB), an integrated timber complex in Pahang. Responsible for Forest Licensing/ Administration, Forest Mapping, Road Construction and Logging Operations. Senior Lecturer at the Forestry Faculty, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) from 1986 to 2014. Responsible for teaching and research in Forest Mensuration, Forest Survey, Forest Road, GIS/Remote Sensing and Forest Mapping. Responsible for academic supervision of more than 100 Bachelor/Master/Phd students in their research and thesis writing. Own research at UPM include various areas such as forest mapping using geo spatial tools, forest inventories, forest harvesting and forest management system (SMS). Also involved with consultancy works which include RPH development and Forest Mapping. Participate in organizing local/international seminars on Forestry areas. Published and presented research findings at seminars/conferences and journals. Currently as Auditor at the Food, Agriculture and Forestry /ion (FAF), SIRIM QAS International Sdn Bhd, since 2016. Involved in conducting assessments on

Page 14: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 14 of 27

forest management certification MC&I (Natural Forest) & MC&I (Forest Plantations). Training / Research Areas:

• Auditor Training Course on MC& I (Natural Forest) and MC&I (Forest Plantation V2), 9th-10th July 2015, SIRIM QAS International Sdn Bhd

• ISO 14001:2004 Lead Assessor Training, 23rd-27th Nov 2015, SIRIM Training Services Sdn. Bhd

• Training on Auditing Techniques, 26th January 2016, SIRIM QAS International Sdn Bhd

Dr. Zahid Emby

Auditor / workers & community issues and related legal issues

• 1977- 1992 – Lecturer, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Educational Services, Universiti Pertanian Malaysia

• Head, August 1992 – 1994, Department of Social Development Studies, Universiti Pertanian Malaysia

• August 1, 1998 -2001. Reappointed as Head of the renamed Department of Social and Development Science for a three year term

• Head, Department of Music from October 2003 until his retirement on December 17, 2006

• Spent some time as a visiting scholar at University of Hull, U.K. and Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.

• Freelance consultant on social issues

Mohd Razman Salim

Observer / Forester

Academic Qualification: B.Sc of Forestry (Forest Production), University Putra Malaysia. Work Experience: Five years experienced as Research Officer at the Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM) since 2007 in a various area such as ecological research for lowland and hill dipterocarp forest, Geographic Information Systems, forest inventories, forest harvesting and forest management system (SMS). Participate in organizing committee member, division level activities and projects. Coordinate and collaborate a long term ecological plot and inventory data about 25 years at the Pasoh, Negeri Sembilan with Negeri Sembilan Forestry Department, universities (local & international) and NGOs. Published and presented research findings at the seminars and conferences. Currently as Auditor at the Food, Agriculture and Forestry Section (FAF), SIRIM QAS International Sdn Bhd, since 2013. Involved in conducting assessments on forest management certification [MC&I (Natural Forest)] & [MC&I (Plantations)], MYNI of RSPO P&C and other management systems on ISO 9001, 14001 and OHSA 18001 Training / Research Areas: Was attending and pass in the following training programmes: Auditor Training Course on Malaysian Criteria and Indicators for Forest Management Certification [MC&I (Natural Forest)] & [MC&I (Plantations] organized by MTCC, 1-4 December 2013.

• EMS 14001: 2004 Lead Auditor Course organized by SIRIM Training Services Sdn Bhd, 18-22 March 2013.

• OHSAS 18001: 2007 Lead Auditor Course organized by SIRIM Training Services Sdn Bhd, 11-15 March 2013.

• QMS 9001: 2008 Lead Auditor Course organized by SIRIM Training Services Sdn Bhd, 4-8 March 2013.

Page 15: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 15 of 27

Attachment 3

Recertification Audit Plan

DAY

TIME

PROGRAM

AUDITOR 1 AUDITOR 2 AUDITOR 3 AUDITOR 4

Day 0 3.00 pm • Travel from Kuala Lumpur to Kuantan

• Check-in at Zenith Hotel, Kuantan Pahang

Day 1

25.1.19

8.30 am

9.00 am – 1.00 pm

• Session with Director of Pahang State Forestry Department

• Opening Meeting with representatives of FMU

• Briefing session by Forest Manager of the FMU on progress of forest activities

• Q&A Session

• Evaluation of changes to the management of the FMU

• Check on progress of planned activities aimed at enhancing the operation system to achieve improvement in overall performance

• Check on complaints, stakeholder comments and follow-up actions o Orang Asli o Government agencies o NGOs

• Check on verification for closing NCRs raised during the previous audit

• Evaluate for internal audit

• Evaluate on management review system

• Stakeholder consultations arrangement

2.00 pm – 7.00 pm

Documentation and records review

• Principle 2 – Tenure and Use Rights and Responsibilities

• Principle 7 – Management Plan

• Principle 8 – Monitoring and Assessment

Documentation and records review

• Principle 5 – Benefits from the forest

• Principle 9 – Maintenance of High Conservation Value Forests

Documentation and records review

• Principle 1 – Compliance with Laws and Principles

• Principle 6 – Environmental Impact

Documentation and records review

• Principle 2 – Tenure and Use Rights and Responsibilities

• Principle 3 – Indigenous Peoples’ Right

• Principle 4 - Community Relations and Worker’s Right

Briefing to representatives of FMU on the progress of audit Review of Day 1 Findings by Audit Team Leader

Day 2

26.2.19

8.30 am – 7.30 pm

Site visit

• Forest Checking Station (Chain of Custody (COC)- BPH Sungai Tekam, Jerantut Feri.

• Compt 50B,61B,64B & 67B, Tekam PRF (CJ-01-38-17 (KP)),

• Pre-F - HS Tekai Tembeling (Tamb), kompt 31A luas ±184.54 Hektar,

• Post-F – HS Berkelah, Kompt. 254.

• Document review at District Office

Site visit

• Stakeholder consultation: DOE

• Forest boundaries / encroachment HS Lepar & Inspection of active harvesting

Site visit & consultations with local communities

• MPKK, Kg. Batu 6/Kolek, Sg. Lembing

• Stakeholder consultation

Page 16: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 16 of 27

(Jerantut)

area, boundaries, buffer zone, road specs Compt 73, Lepar PRF (CK 01-19-18)), ±69.83 Hektar.

• Forest Checking Station (Chain of Custody (COC)) (BPH Gambang, Pasir Kemudi)

• Document review at District Office (Kuantan/ Pekan/ Maran)

: JAKOA

• Inerview with Staff, Quepacs, KPHSM

• Briefing to representatives of FMU on the progress of audit

• Review of Day 2 Findings by Audit Team Leader

Day 3

27.2.19

7.30 am – 7.30 pm

Site visit

• Inspection of active harvesting area, boundaries, buffer zone road specs – Compt. 81, Tekam PRF ((CJ-01-60-18(KP))

• Inspection of active harvesting area, boundaries, buffer zone road specs: Compt 40, Tekai Tembeling PRF ((CJ-01-53-18 (KP)),

• Komp. 115: TLC, HS Tekam

• TLC Komp. 98 HS Tekam

Site visit

• Document review at District Office (Rompin)

• Forest boundaries / encroachment HS Pontian

• Interview with local communities (Penempatan Orang Asli Kedaik)

• TLC: Komp 354, 355, HS Lesong

• BPH (Bergerak): Cenderawasih

• HCVF: Berus Mata Buaya

Site visit & consultations with local communities

• Lata Meraung –Aduan Awam

• SIA: OA Sematau

Day 4

28.2.19

7.30 am – 7.30 pm

Site visit

• Inspection of active harvesting area, boundaries, buffer zone, road specs – Compartment 269, Hulu Jelai PRF (CL-01-19-18 (KP))

• Forest Checking Station (Chain of Custody (COC)) - BPH(S) Sg. Temau

Site visit

• Inspection of active harvesting area, boundaries, buffer zone, road specs – Compt 92, 93A, 92A Chini PRF (CT 01-13-18),

• Forest Checking Station - BPH Paya Lang

• TLC: HS Lakum, Komp 5,4,3,57 (Conversion)

Site visit & consultations with local communities

• Orang Asli: RPS Bertau

• Felcra Sg. Temau/Felda Chegar Perah

Page 17: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 17 of 27

Day 5

1.3.19

7.30 am – 12.30pm

12.30 am – 1.00pm

2.00pm - 4.00 pm

7.30pm

Site Visit

• Komp. 269, HS Ulu Jelai (LPA)

• Komp. 315,316 (LPA)

Site Visit

• Encroachment Boundaries

• Projek Restorasi Cameron Highlands

Stakeholder consultations

• Chemical handling at Nursery Tapak semaian Bt. 5.

• VJR – Paya Pasir

• Wildlife Department (PERHILITAN)

• Department of Environmental (JAS)

• NGOs

Stakeholder consultations

• Jabatan Kemajuan Orang Asli JKOA

• Kesatuan KPPHM Malaysia Barat

Documentation and records review Preparation of audit report and finding Briefing to representatives of FMU on the progress of audit Closing Meeting and presentation of findings of audit and discussion on follow-up activities Adjourn Closing Meeting

Page 18: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 18 of 27

Attachment 4

Details on NCRs and OFIs Raised During this Recertification Audit and Corrective Actions Taken

Specification Major/ Minor/

OFI

Detail Non-conformances Corrective Action Taken Verification by Assessor

Minor

ZE01/2019

Indicator 4.4.2 - Forest planning and management practices shall consider and incorporate the results of such evaluations Finding: No evidence that actions were taken to resolve issues raised by respondents in the social impact Objective evidence: During social impact assessment (Form E – Before and During) carried out at licence CL-01-13-18 KP Ulu Jelai PRF Compt 260, 262, 263, the Chairman and a community representative of Kg Kuala Koyan, Kuala Lipis raised some issues in the social impact assessment. However, no evidence that actions were taken to resolve issues raised by respondents in the social impact assessment.

Result of investigation and determination of root cause Perjumpaan dengan pihak Komuniti Kg. Kuala Koyan yang terlibat dengan kawasan Lesen CL-01-13-18 (KP), Ulu Jelai PRF, Compt 260, 262, 263 telah diadakan sebelum kawasan ini diusahasil. Walaubagaimana pun isu yang dibangkitkan oleh pihak Komuniti telah diteliti dan dalam tindakan Pejabat PHD Lipis. Correction (if applicable) and Corrective action plan including completion date: Tindakan telah dibuat oleh Pejabat Hutan Daerah Lipis dengan mengadakan perjumpaan pada 20 Mac 2019 dengan Komuniti Kg. Kuala Koyan yang terlibat dengan kawasan Lesen CL-01-13-18 (KP), Ulu Jelai PRF, Compt 260, 262, 263. Penerangan telah diberikan pada perjumpaan tersebut dan pihak Komuniti berpuashati dengan penerangan yang diberikan.

Result of investigation, correction and corrective action was accepted The implementation and effectiveness of the corrective action will be verified during the next Surveillance Audit Status: Accepted

Minor KN01/2019

Indicator 5.3.1 - Implementation of guidelines for reduced/low impact logging to minimize damage to residual stand. Finding: Implementation of felling by Logging contractor did not comply to Forest Harvesting Plan Objective evidence: 1. During site inspection at

Compt. 81, Tekam PRF (CJ-01-60-18(KP)), auditor has found one Meranti Tembaga tree stump with DBH 53 cm and without tree tag at LP15/1, Matau 6 was felled.

2. Inspection at LP4/5, Matau 15

at Compt. 81, Tekam PRF (CJ-01-60-18(KP)), auditor has found tree tag no. OK6794/T attached to a Kelat tree (DBH

Result of investigation and determination of root cause 1. PHD Jerantut mendapati

bahawa Pokok Meranti Tembaga yang ditebang adalah bersebelahan dengan pokok yang ditanda sebagai pokok tebangan dan sukar untuk dielakkan semasa kerja-kerja tebangan dilakukan bagi pokok yang ditanda di sebelah Pokok Meranti Tembaga tersebut bagi lesen CJ 01-60-18 (KP), Kompartmen 81, HS Tekam.

2. Semakan mendapati bahawa tag sebenar bagi pokok Meranti Nemesu didapati tertanggal daripada tag tunggul pokok yang telah ditanda bagi lesen CJ 01-60-18 (KP), Kompartmen 81, HS Tekam.

Result of investigation, correction and corrective action was accepted The implementation and effectiveness of the corrective action will be verified during the next Surveillance Audit Status: Accepted

Page 19: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 19 of 27

75 cm), however, another tree tag with same tag no. (OK6794) was attached to a Meranti Nemesu with DBH 80 cm.

3. Inspection at LP19/1, Compt

40, Tekai Tembeling PRF (CJ-01-53-18 (KP) found one felled Pelong tree was without tree tag attached to the logs.

3. Tag tebangan tidak dilekatkan

pada tual-tual pokok pelong semasa pengauditan dilakukan bagi Lesen CJ 01-53-18 (KP), Kompartmen 40 HS Tekai Tembeling (Tambahan)

Correction (if applicable) and Corrective action plan including completion date: A. Tindakan pembetulan ke atas

penemuan di lesen CJ 01-60-18 (KP) Kompartmen 81, HS Tekam

1. PHD Jerantut telah

mengemukakan laporan kesalahan hutan berdasarkan kepada kesalahan tebangan pokok tanpa tag (Meranti Tembaga) bersaiz 53 cm kepada Pengarah Perhutanan Negeri Pahang untuk tindakan kompaun kepada pemegang lesen. Laporan kesalahan hutan sebagaimana surat PHD.J.019/13 SJ.6 (12) bertarikh 28 Februari 2019 adalah berkaitan

2. Penemuan dan dakwaan ketiadaan Tag Tanda Pokok pada pokok tebangan bagi spesies Meranti Nemesu bersaiz 80 cm telah dijumpai tertanggal daripada tunggul pokok tersebut dengan no tag rujukan OK 6856 (Merujuk kepada Laporan Renj – PRH.UT 45/2016 Bertarikh 28/2/2019 adalah berkaitan.

3. PHD Jerantut telah

mengeluarkan surat amaran kepada pemegang dan kontraktor lesen berhubung perkara ini dan kontraktor pembalakan telah mengeluarkan surat amaran kepada semua pekerja pembalakan.

4. Satu taklimat peringatan khususnya mengenai aktiviti pembalakan telah diberikan semula kepada semua pekerja pembalakan

Page 20: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 20 of 27

bagi lesen CJ 01-60-18 (KP), Kompartmen 81, HS Tekam berhubung tatacara dan prosedur pengusahasilan dalam Hutan Simpanan Kekal telah dilaksanakan merujuk kepada surat PHD.J 100-21-007/515 SJ (59) bertarikh 6 Mac 2019 adalah berkaitan.

5. Segala kerja-kerja pengusahasilan dan pengeluaran bagi lesen CJ 01-60-18 (KP) ini adalah ditahan sehingga kes kesalahan hutan ini selesai.

B. Tindakan pembetulan ke atas penemuan di lesen CJ 01-53-18 (KP) Kompartmen 40, HS Tekai Tembeling

1. PHD Jerantut telah

menyemak semula dan mengenalpasti tunggul pokok pelong yang ditebang serta mempunyai tag tagging OC 2126/ T. Tag tebangan tual 1,2,3 telah ditampal di setiap tual-tual pelong yang ditemui. Tual-tual kayu ini digunakan sebagai kayu penahan tanah sementara di dalam kawasan lesen CJ 01-53-18 (KP), Kompartmen 40, HS Tekai Tembeling.

2. Satu taklimat peringatan khususnya mengenai aktiviti pembalakan telah diberikan semula kepada semua pekerja pembalakan bagi lesen CJ 01-53-18 (KP), Kompartmen 40, HS Tekai Tembeling berhubung tatacara dan prosedur pengusahasilan dalam Hutan Simpanan Kekal telah dilaksanakan merujuk kepada surat PHD.J 100-21-018/169 (82) bertarikh 7 Mac 2019 adalah berkaitan.

Minor

MRS01/2019 Indicator 6.5.4 - Availability and implementation of guidelines for conservation of buffer strips along streams and rivers

Result of investigation and determination of root cause Semasa semakan bulanan dibuat di

Result of investigation, correction and corrective action was accepted

Page 21: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 21 of 27

Finding: The implementation of buffer zone did not adhere to the guideline “Guidelines for Forest Road 2010 (amended 2013)” clause 1.7.4 – Zon Penampan Alur Air Objective evidence: During the inspection of License CL-01-19-18 (KP), Compartment 269, Hulu Jelai PRF, near LP 52/1 matau 11, the stream buffer (10m wide) was marked in the harvesting map, however, it was not demarcated at the site

kawasan Lesen CL-01-19-18 (KP), Compartment 269, Hulu Jelai PRF didapati pihak pelesen telah melanggar syarat-syarat lesen yang ditetapkan seperti kesalahan tolakan tanah melebihi had yang ditetapkan dan ditolak ke dalam Zon Penampan Alur Air, pembinaan jalan yang tidak menepati spesfikasi yang ditetapkan di dalam “Guidelines for Forest Road 2010 (amended 2013)”. Satu laporan kesalahan telah dikemukakan untuk tindakan selanjutnya. Correction (if applicable) and Corrective action plan including completion date: Semakan di lapangan telah dibuat dan didapati terdapat Zon Penampan Alur Air telah ditanda mengikut “Guidelines for Forest Road 2010 (amended 2013)” clause 1.7.4 – Zon Penampan Alur Air bagi sungai-sungai yang lain di dalam kawasan Lesen CL-01-19-18 (KP), Compartment 269, Hulu Jelai PRF. Tindakan telah diambil di lapangan dengan menanda semula Zon Penampan Alur Air di kawasan berhampiran LP 52/1 matau 11.

The implementation and effectiveness of the corrective action will be verified during the next Surveillance Audit Status: Accepted

Minor MRS03/2019

Indicator 7.3.2 - Forest workers shall be trained as to their respective roles in the implementation of the forest management plan Finding: 1. The FMU has yet to conduct

scheduled waste training for scheduled waste operator.

2. Annual training programme did not include scheduled waste management awareness training.

Objective evidence: 1. The FMU did not conduct

training on scheduled waste management to scheduled waste operator.

2. Annual training programme for year 2019 did not cover topic on scheduled waste management / ‘SOP Bagi Pelupusan Sisa Pepejal dan Cecair Bukan Organik Berdasarkan Keperluan Kualiti Alam Sekitar’

Result of investigation and determination of root cause Jadual Pelan Operasi Latihan Jabatan Perhutanan Negeri Pahang Tahun 2019 telah kemaskini dan dimasukkan kursus berkenaan dengan Pelupusan Sisa Pepejal dan Cecair Bukan Organik Berdasarkan Keperluan Kualiti Alam Sekitar. Correction (if applicable) and Corrective action plan including completion date: Tindakan telah diambil dengan menjadualkan Kursus Pengendalian Bagi Pelupusan Sisa Pepejal Dan Cecair Bukan Organik Berdasarkan Keperluan Kualiti Alam Sekitar didalam Jadual Pelan Operasi Latihan Jabatan Perhutanan Negeri Pahang Tahun 2019 dan pengendalian kursus akan dilaksanakan pada 22 – 25 April 2019.

Result of investigation, correction and corrective action was accepted The implementation and effectiveness of the corrective action will be verified during the next Surveillance Audit Status: Accepted

Page 22: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 22 of 27

Minor MRS02/2019

Indicator 8.3.1: Forest managers shall provide relevant documents for identifying all forest products leaving the area to be certified so that their origin could be easily determined. Finding: Documents for identifying all forest products leaving the certified area that their origin could be easily determined were not updated in the tree tagging book. Objective evidence:

1. During the inspection of the

records for license CL-01-19-18 (KP), Compartment 269, Hulu Jelai PRF, it was observed that logs that were transported out as written in the Removal Passes CKPB 482188 (items species, log diameters and lengths) were not documented as “removed logs” in the Tree Tagging Book.

2. Visit to Compt 269, Ulu Jelai PRF (CL-01-19-18 (KP) found a felled Kedondong tree (OV6219/T, 64cm) was not recorded in the Tree Tagging Book

Result of investigation and determination of root cause Arahan telah dikeluarkan kepada Pegawai yang menjaga BPH supaya sentiasa mengemaskini Buku Penandaan Pokok Dan Kawalan Pengeluaran Kayu mengikut Pas Pemindah yang dikeluarkan pada setiap hari. Correction (if applicable) and Corrective action plan including completion date: 1. Tindakan pembetulan telah

diambil dengan mengemaskini semula Buku Penandaan Pokok Dan Kawalan Pengeluaran Kayu dengan menyelaraskan maklumat daripada Pas Pemindah CKPB 482188.

2. Semakan di lapangan telah

dibuat dan didapati Pokok Kedondong (OV6219/T, 64cm) telah tebang dan dibawa keluar melalui Pas Pemindah CKPB 482188.

Result of investigation, correction and corrective action was accepted The implementation and effectiveness of the corrective action will be verified during the next Surveillance Audit Status: Accepted

OFI 1 Indicator 4.4.1 - Forest managers shall evaluate, through consultations, social impact of forest operations directly affecting communities, and the people and groups directly affected by the forest operations shall have access to information on the results of the social impact evaluations The social impact assessment form (Form E) has no section for DFO’s comments and as such the DFO is not able to comment on the results of the evaluation.

Surat arahan telah dikeluarkan kepada semua Pegawai Hutan Daerah(PHD) untuk menggunakan format borang E (Form E) Social Impact Assessment yang telah ditambahbaik dengan memasukkan ruangan “Ulasan Pegawai Hutan Daerah”.

Status: Accepted

OFI 2 Indicator 6.10.1 - The forest manager shall ensure that conversion from natural forest to forest plantations or nonforest use: a) Shall not include any High

Conservation Value Forest areas; and

b) Covers a very limited portion*

of the FMU and shall enable

Tindakan telah diambil dengan mengarahkan pihak Pengurus Ladang Hutan (TLC dan Rubber) supaya mengemukakan satu salinan Laporan EIA kepada PHD berkenaan dan juga satu salinan kepada Pengarah Perhutanan Negeri sepertimana yang dikemukakan kepada Jabatan Alam Sekitar Negeri Pahang.

Status: Accepted

Page 23: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 23 of 27

clear, substantial, additional, secure, long term conservation, economic and social benefits across the FMU

The licensee for plantation area (TLC and rubber) has submitted the monitoring report as per EIA requirements to DOE. However, the record was not circulated to the FMU after submission to DOE.

Page 24: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 24 of 27

Attachment 5

Corrective Actions Taken and Final Status on NCRs and OFIs Raised During Previous Audit

Indicator

Specification Major/Minor/

OFI Detail Non-conformances Corrective Action Taken

Verification by Assessor

Indicator 7.1.1

NCR No.

ISMA/AA001

Minor Requirement : Indicator 7.1.1 (i) – Description and justification of harvesting techniques and equipment to be used. Finding : There was no description and justification of harvesting techniques and equipment to be used in “Panduan Penyediaan Rancangan Pengurusan Hutan bagi Negeri-negeri di Semenanjung Malaysia” (18 Feb/23 Feb 2018) and in the latest FMP (or RPH) “Rancangan Pengurusan Hutan (RPH) Negeri Pahang 2016-2025” Objective evidence:

• Panduan Penyediaan Rancangan Pengurusan Hutan bagi Negeri-negeri di Semenanjung Malaysia (18 Feb/23 Feb 2018)

• Rancangan Pengurusan Hutan (RPH) Negeri Pahang 2016-2025

Rancangan Pengurusan Hutan (RPH) 2016-2025 ada menyatakan peralatan yang digunakan dalam aktiviti pengusahasilan. Walaubagaimanapun, penerangan dan perincian tidak dinyatakan secara terperinci dan perkara ini akan dimasukkan sewaktu Kajian Separuh Penggal yang akan dilaksanakan pada tahun 2020

Auditor has received Corrective Action Plan from PSFD on 12 April 2018 General description and justification of harvesting techniques and equipment to be used are inserted in the latest and updated copy of the Rancangan Pengurusan Hutan (RPH) Negeri Pahang 2016-2025. The FMP was amended as in Letter PHN.PHG. (PEM) 118/191 Jilid 4 (5) dated 27 Feb 2019, circurlation to all DFO’s of the new amendmend of the FMP (2016-2025). Therefore, Minor NCR was closed Status: Closed

Indicator 7.2.2

NCR No.

:ISMA/AA002

Minor Requirement: Indicator 7.2.2 – Forest managers shall be aware of new scientific and technical information pertinent to the management of the area to be certified. Finding : “Mid-term review of the FMP of Pahang FMU 2006-2015”, dated June 2012 reported that there was an increment in the size of PRF area from 1.51 million hectares to 1.78 million hectares in 2010 (Pg.13-14; Table 3.3.1a). However, the new information or PRF size

JPNP telah membuat semakan semula ke atas kedua-dua dokumen iaitu Rancangan Pengurusan Pahang 2006-2015 dan Kajian Separuh penggal 2010 mengenai data keluasan HSK dan mendapati keluasan sebenar HSK adalah 1.56 Juta Hektar dan bukan 1.78 juta Hektar. Perkara ini juga telah disahkan melalui pelaporan di dalam Laporan Tahunan iaitu bermula dari Laporan Tahunan 2008-2014. (Seperti di lampiran) Bagi Rancangan

Auditor has received Corrective Action Plan from PSFD on 12 April 2018 The Rancangan Pengurusan Hutan Pahang 2016-2025, has described a total area of 1.56 million ha for PRF in Pahang FMU while the Audit scope for MC&I certification is maintained from Surveillance Audit 1 at 1,504,407.35 ha The FMP was amended as in Letter

Page 25: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 25 of 27

was not recorded in the new FMP (RPH 2016-2025). Objective evidence :

1. Mid-Term Review of the Forest Management Plan of Pahang FMU 2006-2015

2. Rancangan

Pengurusan Hutan (RPH) Negeri Pahang 2016-2025

PRINSIP 7 – Rancangan Pengurusan (Kriteria 7.2: Petunjuk 7.2.2 – Laporan semakan separuh penggal RPH 2006-2015

Pengurusan Hutan Pahang 2016-2025, JPNP masih menggunakan keluasan sebenar HSK berjumlah 1.56 Juta Hektar manakala Skop persijilan FMU Pahang dalam HSK adalah 1,504,407.35 hektar

PHN.PHG. (PEM) 118/191 Jilid 4 (5) dated 27 Feb 2019, circulation to all DFO’s of the new amendmend of the FMP (2016-2025). Status: Closed

Indicator 6.5.2

NCR No.:

MN001/2018

Minor Requirement : Indicator 6.5.2 -Implementation of reduced/low impact logging to minimise damage to the environment. Finding : The FMU fail to implement RIL as per guideline and manuals Objective evidence : During the visit to licence CT 01-9-17(KP) Kompt 101-A, Chini FR, inspection of skid trails was made without following the alignment that has been approved in harvesting plan; LP29/5 has one unauthorised skid trails while LP30/5 has four unauthorised skid trails.

PHD Temerloh telah mengeluarkan surat arahan kepada pihak kontraktor di kawasan lesen CT-01-9-17 kompartmen 101A, HS Chini agar kerja-kerja diberhentikan dan mengukur semula lorong penarik dan membuat pembaikan jalan seperti dalam garis panduan Jalan Hutan 2010 (pindaan 2013) serta mengangkat permohonan pindaan dan pertambahan untuk kelulusan. Semakan PHD Temerloh melalui surat semakan no rujukan PHD.TEM.100.21/0/779 (B) Jld. 3 mendapati keadaan lorong penarik telah dibaiki oleh pihak pelesen di LP 29/5 dan penandaan permohonan tambahan cabang baru dan cabang lama di LP31/5 telah ditanda di dalam pelan dan telah diluluskan oleh PHD Temerloh (Kelulusan Lorong penarik adalah tertakhluk kepada PHD terlibat). LP tersebut telah ditanam dengan anak pokok (Seperti di lampiran). Pihak JPNP akan mengadakan latihan mengenai Garis Panduan

District Forest Officer of Temerloh had issued ‘Stop Work’ order for license CT-01-9-17 Compt 101A, Chini to implement ‘Corrective actions’ to; LP29/ and LP30/5 skid trails i.e. measurement of length and repair according to Garis Panduan Jalan Hutan 2010 (pindaan 2013), as well as application for changes and increase of skid trail for approval. Monitoring report of the ‘corrective action’ (PHD.TEM.100.21/0/779 (B) Jld. 3 showed that the affected skid trails had been repaired and the new and old skid trails branches approved by the DFO were marked in the plan. PSFD had conducted training on ‘Garis Panduan Jalan Hutan 2010 (Pindaan 2013)’ to forestry staff and contractors on 7 and 8 August 2018 Status: Closed

Page 26: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 26 of 27

Jalan Hutan 2010 (Pindaan 2013) pada 7 dan 8 Ogos 2018 sebagaimana yang telah dijadualkan di dalam Buku Program Latihan JPNP 2018.

Indicator 4.3.3

NCR No. :

MN002/2018

Minor Requirement: Indicator 4.3.3 The right of workers to benefits and protection is assured under applicable law and/or regulations Finding : The contractor, Syarikat Pembalakan LTH failed to uphold the employment contract with the workers on the entitlement of workers’ annual leave and weekly day off. Objective evidence : Inspection of document and interview session with the workers to licence CJ-01-48-17 (KP), Logging Camp of Kompt 37-B & 37-A, Tekam FR found that signed document contract between the employees (contractor) clearly stated that the workers are entitled of 8 days per year and one day off each week. However, interview with the workers found that none of the entitlement is given to them.

PHD Jerantut telah meminta kontraktor syarikat pembalakan LTH untuk menyediakan perjanjian selaras dengan persetujuan pelaksanaan perjanjian antara majikan dan pekerja bagi mendapat manfaat dan perlindungan di bawah undang-undang dan peraturan berkaitan. Surat arahan telah dikeluarkan kepada kontraktor syarikat pembalakan LTH merujuk kepada surat PHD.J006/70SJ4(54) bertarikh 5 Mac 2018. Pihak kontraktor telah menyediakan perjanjian yang telah dipersetujui oleh Jabatan Perhutanan Negeri Pahang yang merupakan perjanjian antara majikan (Syarikat pembalakan LTH) dan pekerja

The contractor, Syarikat Pembalakan LTH has been instructed by Jerantut DFO to prepare an employment contract with the workers on the entitlement of workers’ annual leave and weekly day off (ref: PHD.J006/70SJ4(54) dated 5 Mac 2018). The employment contract which is approved by the PSFD is currently available Status: Closed

Indicator 4.2.5

NCR No. :

MN003/2018

Minor Requirement: Indicator 4.2.5 - Demarcation of hazardous areas and provision of guidelines for storage and handling of hazardous materials Finding: Hazard and warning signage as per required under the OSH & EQA (Scheduled Wastes) Regulations were not properly labelled and display (no fire hazard symbol)

Objective evidence: Inspection of diesel storage in Logging Camp of licence CT-9-17(KP) Kompt 101-A,

PHD Temerloh telah mengeluarkan surat PHD.TEM.100.0/18 JLD 10(44) Bertarikh 5 Mac 2018 yang mengarahkan pelesen untuk menyediakan papan tanda yang mengandungi simbol ‘Awas Mudah Terbakar’ di kongsi lesen CT 01-9-17 (KP), Kompt. 101A, Hutan Simpan Chini, Tindakan pemasangan simbol papan tanda ini telah dibuktikan melalui laporan PHD Temerloh kepada Pengarah Perhutanan Negeri melalui surat PHD.TEM.100.0/18 JLD 10(45) Bertarikh 13 Mac 2018 seperti di

DFO of Temerloh has issued a letter (PHD.TEM.100.0/18 JLD 10(44) dated 5 March 2018) instructing contractor to make available sign boards containing ‘Danger; Flammable Material’ for camp of license CT 01-9-17(KP) Kompt 101-A, Chini FR. Availability and display of the said signboards is verified through report of Temerloh DFO to State Director of PSFD (PHD.TEM.100.0/18 JLD 10(45) dated 13 March 2018)

Page 27: FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION · 2019-12-02 · Raub/Cameronhighlands is sub divided into two administrative districts. The inland forest is managed under a Selective Management

Page 27 of 27

Chini FR found that no proper signage of hazard materials were displayed

lampiran.

Status: Closed

Indicator 1.1.1

OFI Requirements on EIA, Benefit Cost Analysis and ‘Rancangan Pengurusan Ladang Hutan’ shall be communicated in writing to license holders of Forest Plantation in PRF.

Pihak Jabatan Perhutanan Negeri Pahang (JPNP) dalam proses mengatur dan mengemaskini maklumat berkaitan Benefit Cost Analysis di mana JPNP akan mengarahkan pihak pemegang lesen ladang hutan agar menyediakan maklumat berkaitan semasa proses kelulusan ladang dibuat dan memohon ladang hutan sedia ada yang masih dalam proses penyediaan BCA perlu menghantar satu salinan kepada pihak JPNP sebagai rekod di dalam fail terlibat

Information update for all approved Forest Plantations in Pahang FMU are for:

1. Benefit/Cost Analysis(BCA)

2. EIA (For both approved forest plantation and plantation under process of approval need to send a copy of both BCA and EIA) Status: Closed

Indicator 4.4.1

OFI Jerantut District Forestry Office used two versions of Form E to assess social impact of forest operations – one version is used to assess impact prior to harvesting and another version for assessing impact during and after harvest [See CJ-10-32-16(KP) license file]. In addition, one version of Form E did not have a component on the socio-cultural. As a consequence, the assessment that used this version of Form E would not be able to get data on the potential and actual socio-cultural impact of forest operations. A more uniform assessment of social impact would be possible if PSFD were to use only one version of Form E with all the necessary components for assessing social impact to be used by all the districts.

JPN Pahang mengambil maklum perkara berkaitan borang E iaitu Penilaian impak sosial dan akan mengadakan perbincangan bagi semua daerah bagi menyelaraskan borang yang digunapakai sedia ada agar ianya selaras bagi setiap daerah dengan menggunakan satu versi sahaja.

A standardized Form E for social impact assessment of forestry operations will be developed and used in all District Forest Department in PSFD Status: Closed