FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

37
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT (SAR) FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME: COMMERCIAL PRACTICE (TIER-II) Submitted to NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION New Delhi

Transcript of FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

Page 1: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT (SAR) FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING

PROGRAMME:

COMMERCIAL PRACTICE

(TIER-II)

Submitted to

NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION

New Delhi

Page 2: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC

Ullavi road, Sorab – 577 429

KARNATAKA STATE

YEAR - 2017

FOREWORD

We would be failing in our duty if we do not place on record our gratitude and appreciation

for the help we have received from the following people.

The Members of the Board of the NBA and the NBA Engineering Committee for their

ready and willing cooperation and the officials of NBA for their dedicated efforts.

Committee comprising Sri. H U Talwar, Director, Department of Technical Education,

Bangalore for their valuable contribution in drafting the initial accreditation manual.

We welcome suggestions from all the stakeholders in Engineering Education in order to

bring further improvement in the effort of NBA to provide a transparent and credible System of

accreditation of engineering programs in India.

Page 3: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

Sri D S Ravishankar

Principal,

Government Polytechnic,

Sorab

Page 4: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

Organization of the SAR

PART A: Institutional Information

PART-B: Program level criteria

CRITERION 1 : Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives

CRITERION 2 : Program curriculums and teaching-Learning process

CRITERION 3 : Course outcomes and program outcomes

CRITERION 4 : Student performance

CRITERION 5 : Faculty information and contributions

CRITERION 6 : Facilities and Technical Support

CRITERION 7 : Continuous Improvement

CRITERION 8 : Student Support Systems

CRITERION 9 : Governance, institutional support and financial

resources

Abbreviations:

1. CAY: Current Academic Year 2016 - 17

2. CAYm1: Current Academic Year minus one 2015 - 16

3. CAYm2: Current Academic Year minus two 2014 - 15

4. LYG: Latest Year of Graduation 2015 - 16

5. LYG m1: Latest Year of Graduation minus one 2014 - 15

6. CFY: Current Financial Year 2016 - 17

7. CFYm1: Current Financial Year minus one 2015 - 16

Page 5: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

SAR CONTENTS

SL. NO. CONTENTS PAGE NO.

PART - A Institutional Information 1

PART - B Criteria Summary 5

Program Level Criteria

1 Vision, Mission, Program Educational Objectives 5

2 Program Curriculum and Teaching – Learning

Processes 7

3 Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes 10

4 Students Performance 27

5 Faculty Information and Contributions 31

6 Facilities and Technical Support 35

7 Continuous Improvement 37

Institute Level Criteria

8 Student Support Systems 38

9 Governance, Institutional Support and Financial

Resources 39

PART - C Declaration by the Institution 50

Page 6: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

PART A

Institutional Information

GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC

Ullavi road, Sorab – 577 429

KARNATAKA STATE

YEAR - 2017

Page 7: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

7

SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT (SAR)

PART A: Institutional Information

1. Name and Address of the

Institution : GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC, SORABA

Beside Government Hospital, Ullavi – Sagara road

SORABA – 577429,

SHIVAMOGGA District, Karnataka

2. Name and Address of the

Directorate of Technical Education : DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION,

Palace Road, Bengaluru - 560001

3. Year of Establishment : 1996

4. Type of the Institution:

University

Deemed University

Autonomous

Affiliated

Any Other (Please Specify)

Government Institution

5. Ownership Status:

Central Government

Page 8: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

8

State Government

Government Aided

Self financing

Trust

Society

Section 25 Company

Any Other (Please specify)

6. Other Academic Institutions of the Trust/Society/etc., if any:

*************NOT APPLICABLE*****************

7. Details of all the programs being offered by the institution under consideration:

SL.No. Program

Name

Year of

Commen

cement

Intake

Capaci

ty

Increase

in

intake, if

any

Year of

increase

AICTE

Approval

Accreditati

on

Status*

Page 9: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

9

1 Diploma in

Civil Engg

1996

40 60 2007-08

F.No.770-53-

178/RC/94,

Date: 23

July, 2007.

Applying

first time

2

Diploma in

Computer

Science

Engg

1996 40 60 1999-

2000

F.No.770-53-

178/RC/94,

Date:16

July, 1999.

Applying

first time

3

Diploma in

Electronics

and

Communica

tion Engg

1996 40 60 1999-

2000

F.No.770-53-

178/RC/94,

Date:16

July, 1999.

Applying

first time

4

Diploma in

Commercial

Practice (E

& K)

1996 40 60 2007-08

F.No.770-53-

178/RC/94,

Date:23

July, 2007.

Applying

first time

7. Programs to be considered for Accreditation vide this application:

Sl. No. Program Name

1 Diploma in Civil Engineering

2 Diploma in Computer Science & Engineering

3 Diploma in Electronics & Communication Engineering

4 Diploma in Commercial Practice (English & Kannada)

9. Total number of Employees: A. Regular*Faculty and Staff:

Items CAY(2016-17) CAY(2015-16) CAY(2014-15)

Min Max Min Max Min Max

Faculty in M 18 31 16 31 19 31

Page 10: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

10

Engineering&

Technology F 03 03 03

Faculty in

Sciences

&Humanities

M 01 03

05 03

01 03

F 01 --- ---

Non-teaching

staff

M 06 45

14 45

14 45

F 01 03 03

B. Contractual Staff (Not covered in Table 9.A):

Items CAY(2016-17) CAY(2015-16) CAY(2014-15)

Min Max Min Max Min Max

Faculty in

Engineering&

Technology

M 00 --- --- ---

F 03 --- --- ---

Faculty in

Sciences

&Humanities

M 03 --- --- ---

F 07 --- --- ---

Non-teaching

staff

M --- --- ---

F --- --- ---

10. Total number of students:

Items CAY (2016-17) CAYm1(2015-16) CAYm2 (2014-15)

Total no. of boys 304 339 307

Total no. of girls 174 172 157

Total no. of

students 478 511 464

Page 11: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

11

11. Contact Information of the Head of the Institution and NBA coordinator:

Head of the Institution

Name : D S Ravishankar.

Designation : Principal Grade

Mobile No : 9480057999

Email id : dsravish @yahoo.com

NBA coordinator

Name : Javeed Iqbal

Designation : Selection GradeLecturer / Science

Mobile No : 8095667616

Email id : [email protected]

Page 12: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

12

PART B: Criteria Summary

Name of the program: Commercial practice

EVALUATION REPORT BY PROGRAM COORDINATOR

Criterion

No Criteria Marks

Program

marks

secured

Criteria

weightage

1 Vision, Mission and Program

Educational Objectives 50 25 50

2 Program Curriculum and

Teaching–Learning Processes 200 55 28

3 Course Outcomes and

Program Outcomes 100 15 15

4 Students’ Performance 200 39 20

5 Faculty Information and

Contributions 150 31 21

6 Facilities and Technical

Support

100

18 18

7 Continuous Improvement 75 2 3

8 Student Support Systems 50

12 24

9

Governance, Institutional

Support and Financial

Resources

75

Total marks

1000

Scale: Award of Accreditation

Full Accreditation for 5 Years: 750 out of 1000 points with a minimum of 60%

points in Criteria 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

Provisional Accreditation for 2 Years: Minimum 600 out of 1000 points, with a

minimum of 60% points in Criteria 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8

No Accreditation: < 600 points out of 1000 points

Remarks: The program cannot be accredited in the current year

Page 13: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

13

SELF-ASSESSMENT REPORT (SAR)

PART-B-PROGRAM LEVEL CRITERIA

CRITERION 1 Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives 50

1. Vision and Mission of the Institute

VISION

“To make best use of ever emerging technology and to contribute in the growth of the Country;

to serve as a valuable resource to the industry and society at large.”

MISSION

To develop the human potential to its fullest extent for the skill based professions.

To provide a motivating learning environment with the technological orientation to maximize

individual Potential.

To undertake collaborative projects with academia and industry which provide opportunities for long term

employment

-

2. DEPARTMENT VISION

To enhance, explore and excel the students quality in office administration, communication,

automation and documentation to meet the emerging needs of corporate and Government organizations by

developing skills either to pursue higher education or self employment through delivering standardized value

based education.

DEPARTMENT MISSION:

M1: To promote intellectual, ethical and secretarial services through high quality teaching and

practices.

M2. For pursuing successful career invoking desire and ability of lifelong learning among students.

M3: To maintain strong institution and industry relationship for career development of students.

M4: To work towards the increase of the employability of the students.

1.2. State the Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) (5)

Program Educational Objectives of the Department of COMMERCIAL PRACTICE are:

PEO 1: To prepare students for successful careers in industry to meet changing demands of their

profession and instill a desire to learn continuously (Professionalism

PEO 2: To provide students a strong foundation in Accountancy, Statistics, office 0peration Skills and

sound basic theoretical knowledge along with required practical skills in the core areas of business and

industry ,Shorthand , Typewriting and Computers ( Discipline and basic core knowledge)

PEO 3: To inculcate team work capabilities and communication skills among students through Seminars,

projects, and industry interactions.(team work and communication

PEO 4: To create awareness on environmental issues and commitment towards professional ethics and

social responsibilities and need for lifelong learning.(Ethics and Environment & society, life long learning

Page 14: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

14

1.3. Indicate where and how the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and disseminated among

stakeholders (10)

Vision and Mission statements were displayed in Notice boards of the department.

The vision and mission statements were conveyed to the Parents during the parents meet of the students

1.4. State the process for defining the Vision and Mission of the Department, and PEOs of the program

(15)

Meeting was conducted in the Department with Stake holders. Their opinion was sought in preparing

Vision and Mission.

Final year students, Staff of the department and Stake holders were asked to prepare SWOT Analysis of

the department. Collective opinion of the SWOT Analysis was taken based on which Vision, Missions

Statements and PEO’s were defined.

1.5. Establish consistency of PEOs with Mission of the Department (15)

Programme Educational Objectives

MISSION STATEMENTS

M1 M2 M3 M4

To prepare students for successful careers in industry to meet

changing demands of their profession and instill a desire to

learn continuously (Professionalism)

M S - M

To provide students a strong foundation in Accountancy,

Statistics, office 0peration Skills and sound basic theoretical

knowledge along with required practical skills in the core areas

of business and industry ,Shorthand , Typewriting and

Computers ( Discipline and basic core knowledge)

S S S S

To inculcate team work capabilities and communication skills

among students through Seminars, projects, and industry

interactions.(team work and communication)

M M - -

To create awareness on environmental issues and commitment

towards professional ethics and social responsibilities and need

for lifelong learning.(Ethics and Environment & society, life long

learning

S - M -

Page 15: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

15

CRITERION 2 Program curriculums and teaching-Learning process 200

2.1. Program Curriculum (50)

2.1.1. State the process used to identify extent of compliance of the Board curriculum for attaining the Program Outcomes (POs) and Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs) as mentioned in Annexure I. Also mention the identified

curricula gaps, if any (30)

Sl no S

E

M

COURSES

PRESCRIBED

FOR PROGRAM

PROGRAM OUTCOMES PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1

0

1 2 3

15CP11T 1 ENGLISH - - - - 3 3 3 1 3 1

1 2 3

15CP12T 1 BUSINESS

STUDIES - I

3 3 1 - 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP13T 1 FINANCIAL

ACCOUNTANCY-I

3 3 3 - - - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP14E 1 ENGLISH

SHORTHAND

3 3 3 3 - - - 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP14K 1 KANNADA

SHORTHAND

3 3 3 3 - - - 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP15P 1 MODREN

BUSINESS

PRACTICE

3 3 3 - - - - 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP16P 1 BUSINESS

COMPUTER

APPLICATION

3 3 3 3 - - - 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP21T 2 FINANCIAL

ACCOUNTING - II

3 3 - 3 - - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP22T 2 ELEMENTS OF

BUSINESS

STATISTICS

3 3 3 3 - - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP23T 2 BUSINESS

STUDIES – II

3 3 3 1 3 3 3 1 1 2 3

15CP24E 2 ENGISH

SHORTHAND - II

3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

Page 16: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

16

15CP24K 2 KANNADA

SHORTHAND – II

3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP25E 2 ENGLISH

TYPEWRITITNG–I

(SPEED 25/20

WPM)

3 - 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3

1 2 3

15CP25K 2 KANNADA

TYPEWRITING–I

(SPEED

25/20WPM)

3 - 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3

1 2 3

15CP26E 2 ENGLISH

TYPEWRITING – II

(MANUSCRIPT)

3 - 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP26K 2 KANNADA

TYPEWRITING – II

(MANUSCRIPT)

3 - 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP27P 2 BASIC COMPUTER

APPLICATIONS –II

3 3 3 3 - - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

Sl no S

E

M

COURSES

PRESCRIBED

FOR PROGRAM

PROGRAM OUTCOMES PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1

0

1 2 3

15CP31T 3 FINANCIAL

ACCOUNTING-III

3 3 3 3 - 3 - - 3 3 1 2 3

15CP32T 3 FUNCTIONAL

MANAGEMENT

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP33T 3 COMPANY LAW

AND SECRETARIAL

PRACTICE

3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP34E

3 ENG SHORTHAND-

III(SPEED

60WPM)

3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP34K 3 KAN SHORTHAND- 3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

Page 17: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

17

III(SPEED

150LPM)

15CP35E 3 ENG

TYPEWRITING –

III(SPEED 35

WPM)

3 - 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP35K 3 KAN

TYPEWRITING-

III(SPEED 25

WPM)

3 - 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP36P 3 DESK TOP

PUBLISHING

3 3 3 3 - 3 - 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP37P 3 SECRETARIAL

SKILLS AND

PRACTICE

2 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP41T

4 ENGLISH-II - - - - 3 3 3 1 3 1 1 2 3

15CP42T 4 FINANCIAL

ACCOUNTING-IV

3 3 3 3 - 3 - - 3 3 1 2 3

15CP43T 4 INDIAN

CONSTITUTION

AND

PROFESSIONAL

ETHICS

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

1 2 3

15CP44E 4 ENG SHORTHAND-

IV(SPEED 90WPM)

3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP44K 4 KAN SHORTHAND-

IV(SPEED

200LPM)

3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP45E 4 ENG

TYPEWRITING –

IV(SPEED 45WPM)

3 - 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP44K 4 KAN

TYPEWRITING-

IV(SPEED 34WPM)

3 - 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

Page 18: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

18

15CP46E

4 ENG

TYPEWRITING –V

(MANUSCRIPT)

3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP46K 4 KAN

TYPEWRITING-V

(MANUSCRIPT)

3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15CP47P 4 INTERNET AND E-

COMMERCE

3 3 3 3 - - 3 3 3 3 1 2 3

15KA4KT 4 KANNADA 1 2 3

2.1.2. Contents beyond the Syllabus (20)

NOT CONDUCTED

2.2 Teaching Learning Process (150)

Describe Processes followed to ensure/improve quality of Teaching & Learning (25)

o Classes and extracurricular activities were conducted.

o Remedial classes were taken to assist weaker students. More attention was given for

weaker students in the class rooms to bring them to the main stream.

o Practical classes were conducted to give hands on training with regard to practical

concepts, Recording observation and analysis of data based on observation.

2.2.1. Initiatives to improve the quality of semester tests and assignments (15)

o Internal semester question paper set as per Cognitive levels.

o Tests and assignments were given to empower the students to develop high order learning skills.

o Activity based assignments were given to students and practical tests were conducted to assess practical skills of the stud

2.2.2. Initiatives to improve the quality of semester tests and assignments (15)

* Internal semester question paper set as per Cognitive levels.

* Tests and assignments were given to empower the students to develop high order learning skills.

* Activity based assignments were given to students and practical tests were conducted to assess practical skills of the students.

2.2.3. Quality of Experiments (15)

Page 19: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

19

(Aim/Type of experiment, Relevance to Outcomes), Example

Curriculum lab

description

activities Lab/workshops

Manuals

Typewriting To learn about the typing machine, speed passages. And different types of letters such as business letter, official letters, D O letters, Statements, Invoices, Balance sheets.

Typing learning book and manuscripts that area available.

o Students are assessed by the typing lab internal which includes viva-voice, practicing of different speed levels, different letters, attendance, results and typewriting files.

o students are provided with required typewriting machines and other necessities for performing the typing in the lab.

o Typing lab internals are conducted thrice in the semester for assessing the performance of the students in the respective laboratory

2.2.4 Quality of Students Projects and Report Writing (25)

NOT APPLICABLE

Page 20: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

20

2.2.5. Industry Interaction and Industry Internship/Training (30)

NOT APPLICABLE

2.2.6 Information Access Facilities and Student Centric Learning Initiatives (15)

NOT APPLICABLE

2.2.7. New Initiatives for embedding Professional Skills (15) )

Imparting professional skills through education itself.

2.2.8 Co-curricular & Extra Curricular Activities (10)

o The college encourages every student to take part in all the extracurricular activities held in

the campus and off the campus. The college has got necessary and sufficient facilities for all

round development of individual apart from curriculum. Students of our department are

participating state level sports events.

o NSS: The NSS wing of the college organizes activities like environmental awareness

programmes & social awareness programmes etc. The students of our program were

effectively participated

o Cultural activities: The College hosts a one day annual talent day in which the students takes

part in various inter-departmental competitions like folk songs, group songs, mono acting , etc

and won several prizes

Page 21: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

21

CRITERION 3 Course outcomes and program outcomes 100

3.1. Establish the correlation between the courses and the POs & PSOs (20)

3.1.1. Course Outcomes (SAR should include course outcomes of one course from each semester of study,

however, should be prepared for all courses) (05)

Course outcomes of all the courses in all semesters

Course

code

sem Course

name

Course outcome

15CP12T 1 Business

Studies-I

Analyse various activities of business organizations.

Identify various forms of business organizations

Inculcate business ethics and shoulder social responsibility

Acquire the knowledge of e-transactions

15CP22T 2 Business

Statistics

Explain the basic statistical principles and methods

Classify and tabulate the stastistical data

Analyse and calculate the central tendancy and dispersion with

respect to Mean Median and Mode.

Compare and establish relationship by means of Correlation and

index Numbers

Present data in diagrams and graphs

3.1.2. CO-PO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1

COURSE OUTCOMES FOR SUBJECT BS

(15CP12T) FOR 1

ST SEM

PROGRAM OUTCOMES

PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3

Analyse various activities of business organizations S S M M S S S M S S S S S

Identify various forms of business organizations

S S M M S S S M S S S S S

Inculcate business ethics and shoulder social

responsibility

S S M S S S S M S S S S S

Acquire the knowledge of e-transactions

S S M S S S S M S S S S S

Page 22: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

22

semester from 1st to 6th semester) (5)

COURSE OUTCOMES FOR SUBJECT BS

(15CP22T) FOR 2ND SEM

PROGRAM OUTCOMES

PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3

Explain the basic statistical principles and methods

S S M M M M S M S S S M S

Classify and tabulate the statistical data S S M M M M S M S S S M S

Analyse and calculate the central tendency and dispersion with respect to Mean Median and Mode.

Compare and establish relationship by means of Correlation and index Numbers

S S M M M M S M S S S M S

S S M M M M S M S S S M S

Present data in diagrams and graphs

S S M M M M S M S S S M S

3.1.3. Program level Course-PO matrix of all courses INCLUDING first year courses (10)

Sl No

S

E

M

COURSES

PRESCRIBED FOR

PROGRAM

PROGRAM OUTCOMES PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1

0

1 2 3

15CP11T 1 ENGLISH 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 S

15CP12T 1 BUSINESS

STUDIES- I

3 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 3

15CP13T 1 FINANCIAL

ACCOUNTANCY-I

3 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 3

15CP14E 1 ENGLISH

SHORTHAND

3 3 2 3 3 3

15CP14K 1 KANNADA

SHORTHAND

3 3 2 3 3 3

15CP15P 1 MODREN BUSINESS

PRACTICE

2 2 2 1

Page 23: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

23

15CP16P 1 BUSINESS

COMPUTER

APPLICATION

3 2 1 2 3 3 3

15CP2T 2 FINANCIAL

ACCOUNTING - II

3 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 3

15CP22T 2 ELEMENTS OF

BUSINESS

STATISTICS

3 2 2 2 3 2 2 3

15CP23T 2 BUSINESS STUDIES

– II

3 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 3

15CP24E 2 ENGISH

SHORTHAND - II

3 3 2 3 3 3

15CP24K 2 KANNADA

SHORTHAND – II

3 3 2 3 3 3

15CP25E 2 ENGLISH

TYPEWRITITNG–I

(SLPEED 25/20

WPM)

3 3 2 3 3 3

15CP25K 2 KANNADA

TYPEWRITING – I

(SPEED 25/20

WPM)

3 3 2 3 3 3

15CP26E 2 ENGLISH

TYPEWRITING – II

(MANUSCRIPT)

3 3 2 3 3 3

15CP26K 2 KANNADA

TYPEWRITING II

(MANUSCRIPT)

3 3 2 3 3 3

15CP27P 2 BASIC COMPUTER

APPLICATIONS -II

3 2 1 2 3 3 3

Page 24: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

24

3.2.1 Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of

Course Outcome is based (10)

Direct assessments

Semester End Exams Continuous Internal Evaluation Lab records

Indirect assessments

Course End survey

3.2.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to set attainment levels (30) S:Ste level A: attainment level

SINCE OUR COURSE IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR ACCREDITATION ON THE BASIS OF

ADMISSION AND RESULT. SO, CO ATTAINMETNT LEVEL IS NOT DONE

3.3. Attainment of Program Outcomes & Program Specific Outcomes (40)

3.3.1. Describe assessment tools and processes used for assessing the attainment of each 3.3.2.

Provide results of evaluation of each PO & PSO (30

POs and PSOs as mentioned in Annexure 1 (10)

Assessment tools Direct /Indirect Remarks

Course outcome

evaluation

Direct The course outcome evaluation is done from respective

course coordinator by the end of each semester. The

modes of evaluation are SEE,CIE, Assignments.

End Semester

Survey

Indirect The feedback taken about courses for each semester.

3.3.2. Provide results of evaluation of each PO & PSO (30) Program

shall set Program Outcome attainment levels for all Pos & PSOs.

SINCE OUR COURSE IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR ACCREDITATION ON THE BASIS OF

ADMISSION AND RESULT. SO, PO ATTAINMETNT LEVEL IS NOT DONE

Page 25: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

25

CRITERION 4 Student performance 200

Intake Information

Item CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

Sanctioned intake strength of the program (N)

(AICTE approved Intake)

60

60 60

Total number of students, admitted through state level counseling(N1)

(on line mode counseling entry) 20 09 17

Number of students, admitted through Institute level quota(N2)

(Off line/Principal level admission) 09 09 01

Number of students, admitted through lateral entry (N3)

(ITI people entry)

Total number of students admitted in the Program (N1 + N2+ N3) 29 18 18

Year of entry N1 + N2 + N3 Number of students who have

successfully passed without

backlogs in any year of study

I Year II year III year

CAY (2016-17) 29 04

CAYm1(2015-16) 18 00 00

CAYm2(2014-15) 18 03 02 03

Year of entry N1 + N2 + N3 Number of students who have successfully passed

I Year II year III year

CAY (2016-17) 29

CAYm1(2015-16) 18 12

CAYm2(2014-15) 18 10 06

Page 26: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

26

4.1. Enrolment Ratio (20): Enrolment Ratio= (N1+N2)/N

=84/90*100=93 CAY 2015-16

Students enrolled at the First Year Level on average basis during the period

of assessment

No of

students

(%)

Marks

>=90% Students on online + off line (CAY 2016-17) 26

Enrolment Ratio (20): Enrolment Ratio= (N1+N2)/N =29/90*100=26 CAY 2014-15

Students enrolled at the First Year Level on average basis during the period

of assessment

No of

students

(%)

Marks

>=50% Students ( CAY M1 2015-16) 16

Enrolment Ratio (20): Enrolment Ratio= (N1+N2)/N =18/90*100=16 CAY 2013-14

Students enrolled at the First Year Level on average basis during the period

of assessment

No of

students

(%)

Marks

<50% Students ( CAY M2 2014-15

16 0

4.2. Success Rate in the stipulated period of the program

4.2.1. Success rate without backlogs in any year of study (40)

SI= (Number of students who have passed from the program without backlog)/(Number of students admitted

in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry):Average SI = Mean of success index

(SI) for past three batches: Success rate without backlogs in any year of study = 40 × Average SI

Item Latest Passed

Batch

Latest

Passed

Batch

Minus 1

Latest

Passed

Batch Minus 2

Number of students admitted on merit + admitted on management quota/otherwise + admitted through lateral entry (N1 + N2 +

N3)

28 40 42

Number of students who have

passed in the stipulated period 10 15 20

Success index (SI) 0.357 0.375

0.476

Average SI 0.40267

Page 27: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

27

4.2.2 Success rate in a stipulated period (20)

Item Latest Passed

Batch

Latest

Passed

Batch

Minus 1

Latest

Passed

Batch

Minus 2

Number of students admitted on merit + admitted on management quota/otherwise + admitted through lateral entry (N1 + N2 +

N3)

28 40 42

Number of students who have

passed in the stipulated period 10 15 20

Success index (SI) 0.357 0.375 0.476

Average SI 0.40267

4.3 Academic Performance in Final Year (15)

API = (Mean of Final Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the percentage of

marks of all successful students in Final Year/10) x (successful students/number of students appeared in the examination)

Successful students are those who passed in all the final year courses

4.4. Academic Performance in Second Year (20)

Academic Performance CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all successful

students (X) 6 7 03

Total no. of successful students (Y) 03 5 01

Total no. of students appeared in the examination (Z)

12 17 08

API = x* (Y/Z) 1.5 2.05 0.3

Average API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3 1.4

Academic Performance CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all successful

students (X) 05 8 10

Total no. of successful students (Y) 02 07 08

Total no. of students appeared in the examination (Z) 08 13 19

API = x* (Y/Z) 1.25 4.3 4.2

Page 28: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

28

Average API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3 3.25

Page 29: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

29

4.6. Placement and Higher Studies (40)

4.7. Professional Activities (20)

4.7.1. Professional societies / student chapters and organizing technical events (15)

Not AVAILABLE

4.7.2Publication of technical magazines, newsletters, etc. (05)

--- NIL---

4.5. Academic Performance in First Year (25)

Academic Performance CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all

successful students (X) 05 02 11

Total no. of successful students (Y) 05 02 08

Total no. of students appeared in the examination (Z)

11 12 14

API = x* (Y/Z) 2.2 0.3 6.2

Average API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3 2.9

Item LPB LPBm1 LPBm2

Total No. of Final Year Students (N) 14 22 12

No. of students placed in companies or

Government Sector (X) - - --

No. of students admitted to higher Studies (Y)

1.25X + Y - - -

Placement Index : (1.25X + Y)/N

T = Average of (1.25X + Y)/N -

Assessment = 40 X T (To be limited to 40) -

Page 30: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

30

CRITERION 5 Faculty information and contributions 150

Faculty Information

Current year (CAY)

Name of

the Faculty

Member

Qualification,

Board and Year of

Graduation

Distribution of Teaching

Load (%)

Academic Research Years of

experience

Research Paper

Publications

Faculty

Receiving

M.Tech/ Ph.D.

during the

Assessment

Year

I year

II

year

III

year

CHANDRASHEKAR H S

M.COM. M. Phil 2009

20 6 6 NIL NIL 22YEARS

JAYANNA G

M.A 2004 18 10 14 NIL NIL 6 YEARS

Page 31: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

31

Current year (CAYm1)

Name of

the Faculty

Member

Qualification,

Board and Year of

Graduation

Distribution of Teaching

Load (%)

Academic Research Years of

experience

Research Paper

Publications

Faculty

Receiving

M.Tech/ Ph.D.

during the

Assessment

Year

I year

II

year

III

year

CHANDRASHEKAR H S

M.COM. M.Phil 2009

20 6 6 NIL NIL 22 YEARS

JAYANNA G

M.A -2004 18 10 14 NIL NIL 5YEARS

Current year (CAYm2)

Name of the Faculty Member

Qualification, board and

year of graduation

Distribution of teaching load(%)

Academic Research Years of

experience

1st

year 2nd year

3rd year

Research paper

publications

Faculty

receiving

M.Tech/Ph.D during the

assessment year

JAYANNA .G

M.A 2004

26 18 14 NIL NIL 4 YEARS

5.1. Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR) (15) + Availability of HoD (5); (20)

Year

N=No. of students =

First year approved

intake + 2x (first

year approved intake

+ 20% of lateral

entry),

Available faculty(F) SFR= N/F

CAY 180 02 90

CAYm1 180 02 90

CAYm2 180 01 180

Average SFR for three assessment years 120

5.2. Faculty Qualification (20)

FQ=2.0*(10X+7Y)/F=16 5.3. Faculty Retention (20)

Page 32: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

32

Item

No of

faculty

retained

(%)

Marks

>=90% required faculty members retained during the period

assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year 100 20

>=75% required faculty members retained during the period

assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year

>=60% required faculty members retained during the period

assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year

>=50% required faculty members retained during the period

assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year

<50% required faculty members retained during the period

assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year

5.4. Faculty as participants in Faculty development/training activities (30)

A Faculty scores maximum five points for participation: Participant in 2 to 5 days Faculty/faculty

development program: 3 Points: Participant >5 days Faculty/faculty development program: 5 points

- NIL -

5.5. Product development, Consultancy, Manufacturing contracts, Testing contracts (20)

-- NIL --

5.6. Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development System (FPADS) (30)

An effective performance appraisal system for Faculty exists as per KCSR rules.

Each faculty should self evaluate about his contribution towards academic, results of the

courses he/she handled and their contribution to institutional performance. The

confidential reports are finally reviewed by Principal and forwarded to Director,

Department of Technical Education.

5.7. Implementation of Career advancement Scheme (10)

-- NIL --

Page 33: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

33

CRITERION 6 Facilities and Technical Support 100

6.1. Availability of adequate, well-equipped classrooms to meet the curriculum requirements (10)

There are Two class rooms and One Conference Hall. there

Each class room is provided with 12 desks having sitting capacity for 45 students.

Conference Hall is provided with 20 desks having witting capacity for 80 students.

The class room is provided with enough number of windows for proper lighting and air

circulation along with tube lights and fans.

Each class room is provided with single door for entrance and exit.

Sl

No

Class

room

Carpet

area

sitting

capacity

Availability

of OHP

Other smart

facilities if any

Weakly

utilization

1 306 33.75*9.5 Sq .mtrs

45 NO NO Full week

2 307 33.75*9.5 Sq .mtrs

45 NO NO Full week

4 English

typing hall

33.75*9.5 Sq .mtrs

25 NO NO Full week

5 Kannada

typing hall

33.75*9.5 Sq .mtrs

25 NO NO Full week

6.2. Availability of adequate, well-equipped workshops to meet the curriculum requirements (10)

Sl

No

Name of

the work

shop

No of students/

batch

Name of the

Power tools/ma

chine

tool

Weakly

Utilization

Areas in

which

students

expected to

have

enhanced

learning

Relevance

to

PO/PSO

NOT APPLICABLE

6.3 Adequate and well equipped laboratories, and technical manpower (30)

Sl No Name of

the

laboratory

No of students

/batch

Name of the Important

equipment

Weakly

Utiliza

tion

Technical man power support

Name of the

Teaching staff

Designa

tion

Qualific

ation

1 COMPUTER

LAB 15 Desktops Full

CHANDRASHEKAR

H S Sel.

LECTURER

M.Com

M.phil

2 ENG. T.W.

LAB 10 Typewriters Full JAYANNA G LECTURER M.A

3 KAN T.W

LAB 05 Typewriters Full JAYANNA G LECTURER M.A

6.4. Additional facilities created for improving the quality of learning experience in

laboratories (20)

Page 34: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

34

-- NIL --

6.5. Laboratories: Maintenance and overall ambiance (10)

-- NIL --

6.6. Availability of computing facility in the department (10)

Sl

No

No of Computer

terminals

Student-Computer

ratio

Details of legal

software

Details of

Networking

Details of

printers

and

Number of

availability

Details of

Scanners

and Number

of

availability

1 10 14:1 Window XP TALLY 9.0 NIL NIL 1

6.7. Language lab (10): Does not Exist

Page 35: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

35

CRITERION 7 Continuous Improvement 75

7.1. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs & PSOs (25)

POs & PSOs Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement – CAY(Not for CAYm1 and

CAYm2)

7.2. Improvement in Success Index of Students without the backlog (10)

Item LPB LPBm1 LPBm2

Success index (from

criteria4.2.1)

0.179 0.07 0.10

7.3. Improvement in Placement and Higher Studies (10)

Item LPB LPBm1 LPBm2

placement index (from

criteria4.6)

NOT AVAILABLE

7.4. Improvement in Academic Performance in Final Year (10)

Item LPB LPBm1 LPBm2

Academic Performance (From

Criteria4.3) 2.2 1.8 1.1

7.5. Internal Academic Audits to Review Complete Academics & to Implement Corrective

Actions on Continuous Basis (10)

Item CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

INTERNAL ACADEMIC AUDITS NIL NIL

NIL

7.6. New Facility created in the program (10)

Item CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

New facility created NIL NIL

NIL

Page 36: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

36

INSTITUTE LEVEL CRITERIA

CRITERION 8 Student Support Systems 50

8.1 Mentoring system to help at individual level (10)

The students Grievances Cell are framed to redress the genuine Grievances students so

as to ensure a congenial atmosphere for studies and smooth working of administration.

Students are divided into number of groups defending upon number of faculty

members available in the concerned department. One of the faculty member in the

concerned department is nominated as a mentor for that group and asked to students

address their problems

8.2. Feedback analysis and reward /corrective measures taken, if any (10)

Feedback collected for all courses: YES

The mid semester course feedback form is collected at the mid of the semester

and course survey questionnaire form is collected at the end of the semester for each

course and from each student. The IQAC cell will review the feedback and questionnaire

forms and the findings will be reported to respective program coordinator (HOD) and

corrective action has initiated based on findings.

8.3. Feedback on facilities (5)

Assessment is based on student feedback collection, analysis and corrective action(s)

taken.

Students, student association members and parents may ask facilities and the institute

will take necessary steps to provide the facilities.

8.4. Career Guidance, Training, Placement (20)

Institution has the placement cell since from last 5 years. At present Kum. Harshitha

lecturer in Electronics and communication Dept is nominated as the placement officer. All the

final year students are enrolled their names in the available registers and if there is any

requirement form the reputed firm will be intimated student along with the suitable

guidance.

8.5. Entrepreneurship Cell/Technology Business Incubator (5)

NIL

Page 37: FOR ACCREDITATION OF DIPLOMA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ...

37