Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On...

26
Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program and Site Support DOE Office of Environmental Management Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference Grand Junction, CO Grand Junction, CO November 16-18, 2010 November 16-18, 2010

Transcript of Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On...

Page 1: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On

Investment”

Mark GilbertsonDeputy Assistant Secretary

Program and Site SupportDOE Office of Environmental Management

Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance ConferenceLong-Term Surveillance and Maintenance ConferenceGrand Junction, COGrand Junction, CO

November 16-18, 2010 November 16-18, 2010

Page 2: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

2

Footprint Reduction & Energy Parks

EM Footprint Reduction, small site completions, and other investment opportunities

Jobs created

Lifecycle cost reduced

Environment protected

Footprint reduced

Large tracts of land and infrastructure available

Energy Parks

Clean, Diverse Energy Sources • Energy security• Establish long-term site mission• Sustainable jobs

Recovery Act

Economic Stimulus

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Page 3: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

3

Savannah River Site Footprint Reduction Proposal

3

Page 4: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

4

Hanford Footprint Reduction Proposal

4

Page 5: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

5

• Footprint Reduction means that the active DOE EM mission is complete within a particular area in terms of decontamination and decommissioning, waste disposition, ground water remediation, soil removal, etc.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Sept. 2008 Sept. 2009 Sept. 2010 Sept. 2011 Sept. 2012 Sept. 2013 Sept. 2014 Sept. 2015 Post Sept. 2015

Squa

re M

iles

•900 sq. mi.

•90 sq. mi.

•Approx. 450 sq. mi. Reduction

•EM footprint will be reduced from 900 sq. mi. to approximately 450 sq. mi. (approx. 40 to 50 percent) by Sept. 2011, and to about 90 sq. mi. (approx. 80 to 90 percent) of the initial footprint) by Sept. 2015.

Page 6: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

Potential Assets

• Land• Buffer zones• Structures• Roads• Rail lines• Electricity transmission facilities / grid connections• Natural resources (e.g., surface water, ground water)• Energy resources (e.g., solar, wind, biomass, geothermal)• Equipment• Site environmental characterization data• Highly trained and experienced workers (e.g., scientists, engineers,

craftspeople)• Safety culture• Incentives (e.g., loan guarantees, purchase agreements, tax credits)

6

Page 7: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

7

Opportunities - Energy, Environment & the Economy

• Investing in the Clean Energy Jobs of the Future– Creating new Jobs in the Clean Energy Economy

– Investing in the Next Generation of Energy Technologies

• Securing our Energy Future– Breaking Dependence on Oil

– Producing More Energy at Home

– Promoting Energy Efficiency

• Closing the Carbon Loophole – Reducing greenhouse gas emissions

• Enhancing National Competitiveness

Page 8: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

Future Land Uses

• The DOE is not directing that energy parks must be established at our cleaned up sites – but it is recommending that energy parks be considered as one of the options for future uses of cleaned up sites.

– Other options (e.g., wildlife refuges, industrial parks, etc) may also be considered.

– The DOE would like to consider recommendations for the “best use” of the cleaned up sites from a variety of stakeholders, including local and regional communities, States, the private sector, and others.

8

Page 9: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

9

Potential Technologies

• Wide range of energy technologies:

– Production (e.g., solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, nuclear, clean fossil, hydrogen generation)

– Distribution (e.g., smart grid)– Storage– Efficient utilization– Manufacturing (e.g., solar panels, wind turbines, other energy components)

• Multiple development phases:

– Commercial using existing technologies– Research, Development and Demonstration (RD&D) of advanced

technologies to facilitate deployment and replication across the Nation.

Page 10: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

10

Workshops and MeetingsOak Ridge Workshop

“Corridor Partnerships in Action“ - March 12, 2009 in Oak Ridge, TN

Energy Communities Alliance Meeting "Energy Parks Peer Exchange: The DOE EM Footprint Reduction Plan and Energy Parks Initiative“ – April 23-24, 2009 in Las Vegas, NV

Mound Workshop

“Energy Roundtable and Exhibition” – June 26, 2009 in Miamisburg, OH

Savannah River Site Workshop

“Energy Parks Initiative Workshop” August 18, 2009 in Aiken, SC

Second Savannah River EPI Workshop

April 15, 2010 in Augusta, GA

Energy Communities Alliance Workshop

“Nuclear Workforce Development Peer Exchange” April 21-23, Augusta, GA

Energy Communities Alliance EPI Peer Exchange Meeting

June 10, 2010 in Las Vegas, NV

Other meetings with ECA, WMAB, SSAB, community groups, etc

Page 11: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

Examples of Interest – Proposed Concepts

• Pantex Renewable Energy Project

• Tennessee Valley Energy Enterprise

• Mound Advanced Technology Center – Energy Center Initiative

• Southern Ohio Clean Energy Parks Alliance Initiative

• SRS - U.S. Energy Freedom Center

• Nevada Solar Project

• Mid-Columbia Energy Initiative

• WIPP Project

11

Page 12: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

Executive Order 13514 – Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy and Economic Performance• Issued October 5, 2009, it requires all Federal agencies to establish

an integrated plan toward sustainability, including strategies for:– reducing greenhouse gas emissions,– using water more efficiently,– promoting pollution prevention and eliminating waste,– constructing high performance sustainable building,– purchasing energy efficient and environmentally preferred products, and – reducing use of fossil fuels through improved fleet management.

• To demonstrate leadership, on March 31, 2020, Secretary of Energy Chu committed the Department of Energy to a 28 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by FY 2020.

• E.O. 13524 could be a major driver for EPI.

12

Page 13: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

Federal Partnerships for Economic and Environmental ReDevelopment

• EERE and EM Co-Sponsor EPA 2011 Brownfields Conference: April 3-5, Philadelphia, PA

• EPA Sustainable Partnerships for Redevelopment: federal agencies working with EPA to establish pilot projects at the community level for energy redevelopment (HUD, DOT, etc.)

• DoD/DOE/EPA Workshop to Achieve Energy and Water Sustainability Objectives: agencies establishing energy projects together on federal lands, October 4-5, 2010

• Federal Economic Development Finance Working Group: multiple agencies developing projects, regional centers, funding vehicles, and a web-based financial center for environmental redevelopment

13

Page 14: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

Federal Partnerships for Economic and Environmental ReDevelopment (concluded)• DoD/EERE ESCTP Energy & Water $30 M Portfolio for advanced

technology demonstration and testing on DoD lands, focusing on renewable energy conversions and water conservation (EPI model program with EERE)

• ITRC Green and Sustainable Remediation (GSR) Guidance and Internet Training expected January 2011, focusing on renewable energy conversions and cleanup

• ASTM GSR Standard Guidance (industry-based) to be expected March 2011, focusing on renewable energy conversions and cleanup

• Other

14

Page 15: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

Draft Legislation – H.R. 5136 (NDAA - FY 2011)

• Authorizes the Secretary of Energy to, “Facilitate development of energy parks on defense nuclear facility reuse property through the use of collaborative partnerships with State and local governments, the private sector, and community reuse organizations….”

• Defines energy parks as a facility or group of facilities developed to:• Promote energy security, environmental sustainability, economic

competitiveness, and energy sector jobs, and• Encourage pilot programs, demonstration projects or commercial projects

with respect to energy generation, energy efficiency, and manufacturing technologies that will contribute to the stabilization of atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations through the reduction, avoidance or sequestration of energy related emissions.

• Requires submission of a Report to Congress on “….steps taken to facilitate development of energy parks…” by December 31, 2011.

• Other draft legislation (e.g., S.3454)

15

Page 16: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

Energy Parks Concept

National Objectives Supported

Energy Self-Sufficiency Enhanced National Security Reduced Energy Imports Reduced Trade Deficit Clean Electric Energy

Reduced GHG Emissions Green Jobs

Vibrant Clean Energy Industry Enhanced National

Competitiveness•Community Reuse

Organizations

•States & Tribes

•Labor

•Economic Development Organizations

•Technology Companies

•Local/Regional Communities

•Academic Organizations

•Federal Agencies

•Investors

•DOE Programs, Sites & National Laboratories Energy Projects

• Wind• Solar

• Biomass• Nuclear

• Co-Generation• Clean Fossil• Geothermal

Energy Clusters• Multiple Commercial Energy

Production Operations• Manufacturing Operations

• RD&D Operations• Supply Chain Operations

• Education/Training Activities•Note: Energy Clusters include all

clean technologies covered by Energy Projects

•Framework•Vision

•Objectives•Policies•Strategy

•Business Plan •Guidance

•Procedures•Site/Regional

Data•Federal Assets

•Financing Options•Other

Page 17: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

17

Near-Term Potential Tasks – Under Consideration

• Establish a DOE energy parks task force

• Assess sites’ potential for energy parks

• Conduct outreach to communities, private sector and other stakeholders.

• Identify and address policy issues (e.g., financial, procurement, legal, programmatic, procedural, etc.)

• Develop an energy parks Strategy and Business Plan

Page 18: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

Potential Issues - Examples

• What assets could be made available? Under what conditions?

• How to ensure processes are transparent, equitable and timely?

• How to ensure the best return for taxpayers?

• How to encourage and empower public and private participation?

• What policy issues would need to be addressed to make energy parks a success?

• How to solicit and review best-in-class proposals?

• Indemnification?

• NEPA coverage?

18

Page 19: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

Potential Evaluation Criteria - Examples

• Produces significant quantities of clean, affordable energy.

• Encompasses production, storage, distribution, efficient use & manufacturing.

• Funded largely by private sector; government support is limited in scope and short in duration.

• Produces large number of good jobs.

• Supports development of a vibrant clean energy industry, including supply chains and workforce.

• Promotes environmental sustainability.

• Reduces emission of greenhouse gases.

19

Page 20: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

Potential Evaluation Criteria - Examples

• Supports national security objectives.

• Facilitates participation and cooperation among DOE, communities, the private sector, other federal agencies, local & state governments, academia and other parties.

• Limited water consumption.

• Converts liabilities into assets.

• Contributes to DOE mission objectives.

• Does not adversely affect other DOE missions at the site.

• Reduces EM cleanup program schedule or life cycle cost.

• .

20

Page 21: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

Energy Parks – Opportunities & Challenges

• Multiple DOE programs and sites• Multiple external parties

– Local & regional communities– Community Reuse Organizations (CRO) – States– Tribal Governments– Private sector (technology & financial)– Labor– Other Federal agencies– Other stakeholders

• Wide range of technologies and stages of development• Complex, wide-ranging issues• Numerous ongoing related activities• Great opportunities and great challenges

21

Page 22: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

Backup Slides

Page 23: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

23

Solar Resources

Page 24: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

24

Biomass Resources

This study estimates the technical biomass resources available in the U.S. bycounty. It includes the following feedstock categories:-Agricultural residues (crops and animal manure).-Wood residues (forest, primary mill, secondary mill, and urban wood)-Municipal discards (methane emissions from landfills and domestic wastewater treatment).-Dedicated energy crops (on Conservation Reserve Program and Abandoned Mine Lands). Sept 2005

Page 25: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

25

Wind Resources

Page 26: Footprint Reduction and Energy Parks “Leveraging Assets To Increase Taxpayers’ Return On Investment” Mark Gilbertson Deputy Assistant Secretary Program.

26

Geothermal Resources