Food Safety Management at the Retail Level Katherine MJ Swanson, PhD Vice President Food Safety May...
-
Upload
maximilian-jordan -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
2
Transcript of Food Safety Management at the Retail Level Katherine MJ Swanson, PhD Vice President Food Safety May...
Food Safety Management at the Retail Level
Katherine MJ Swanson, PhDVice President Food Safety
May 28, 2008
Campinas, BrazilIAFP Latin American Symposium
On Food Safety
2
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Discussion Topics
Management of real and perceived risks
Food safety management evolution
Food safety controls in store and supply chain
3
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Retail Food Safety Risk Management
Food safety risksPathogensAllergensForeign materialToxic chemicals
Economic risksSpoilageCostSource of supply
Regulatory risksLocal standards Import/export standards
Perception risksCountry of originGMO IrradiationOrganic, natural, etc.
Real Risks versus Perceived Risks
4
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Retail Food Safety Risk Management
Solid preventive programs
Proactive plans
Measurement with corrective action
Essentials for food safety management
5
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Retail Food Safety Risk Management
Cleaning & sanitation
Cross contamination prevention
Temperature control
Personal hygiene
Supplier control
Food rotation
Chemical management
Pest management
Preventive maintenance
Training and assessments
Specifications
Solid preventive programs
6
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Retail Food Safety Risk Management
Proactive plansHACCP/food safetyQuality management Incident managementBusiness continuity
Measurement & actionAudits & assessmentsMonitoringProduct & program compliance
Support for program design
8
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Emerging Food Safety Management Concept
The maximum frequency and/or concentration of a hazard in a food at the time of consumption that provides or contributes to the appropriate level of protection (ALOP).Codex Alimentarius
Food Safety Objectives (FSO)
9
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Ho - Σ R + Σ I FSO or PO
Starting level
Reduction
IncreaseRecontamination
or growth
Performance ObjectiveHazard level in the
food chain
Food Safety ObjectiveHazard level at moment of
consumption
Food Safety Objectives
10
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Public health burden
primary production
manufacturing retail preparation consumption
Exposure
transport
Performance objective
PO
Food Safety Objective
FSO
Performance criterion
Control Measure
PO POPO
Performance criterion
Control Measure
Performance criterion
Control Measure
Performance criterion
Control Measure
FSOs in the Food Chain
Slide based on JL Cordier 2007
11
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Public health burden
primary production
manufacturing retail preparation consumption
Exposure
transport
Performance objective
PO
Food Safety Objective
FSOPO POPO
Poultry Supply Chain Example
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
12
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Poultry Plant Salmonella Interventions
0 20 40 60 80 100
Chlorine Dioxide OLR
Trisodium phosphateOLR
Acidified sodiumchlorite (ASC) OLR
Peracid in Chiller
ASC Post-Chill Dip +Peracid in Chiller
Salmonella spp. Prevalence (%)
Incoming Post-chill
Not detected
Adapted from: Danilson. 2005. US Poultry & Agr Assoc, Salmonella Control Conference, March 17, 2005
NOTE: Use requires country approval
13
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Acidified Sodium Chlorite on Chicken Carcasses
TPC E. coli Salmonella Campylobacter
cfu/cm2 % cfu/cm2 % cfu/cm2 % cfu/cm2
Untreated 2.78 100 1.55 90 -1.80 100 1.59
ASC 1.23 13 -0.64 10 -1.85 23 -2.21
Mean log difference
1.55 2.19 0.05 3.80
Sexton et al 2007. Intl J. Food Microbiol. 115 (2): 252-5
Substantial reduction in prevalence and levelAustralian commercial operation
15
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Top 10 Factors Contributing to US Foodborne Illness 1998-2002
1. Food at room temp for several hours – 29%2. Bare-hand contact by food handler – 25%3. Inadequate cleaning of equipment – 22%4. Handling by infected person or carrier – 20%5. Inadequate cold-holding temperature – 19%6. Cross contamination from raw animal products – 12%7. Insufficient cooking – 12%8. Raw ingr. contaminated by animal or environment – 11%9. Slow cooling – 11%10. Inadequate hot-holding time/temperature – 10%
Source: CDC 2006 MMWR 55(SS10):1-34
17
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Retail Refrigerated Product Temperatures in USA 2007
010
20304050
6070
Cotta
ge C
hees
e
Yogur
t
Pre-P
ack L
unch
Mea
t
Deli C
ount
er M
eat
Pre-P
acka
ged
Deli
Fish C
ount
er
Fresh
Mea
t
Per
cen
t (%
)
>5°C
>7°C
>10°C
Source: EcoSure 2007 US Cold Temperature Evaluation
18
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Retail Refrigeration TemperaturesUSA 1989, 1999, 2007
3
5
7
9
1989 1999 2007
Tem
per
atu
re (
°C)
Yogurt
Pre-Pack LunchMeat
Deli Counter Meat
Fish Counter
Fresh Meat
Source: EcoSure 2007 US Cold Temperature Evaluation
Trend indicates improved temperature control
19
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Home Refrigeration TemperaturesUSA
02468
10121416182022
1989 1999 2007
Tem
per
atu
re (
°C)
Mean 95th percentile Maximum
Source: EcoSure 2007 US Cold Temperature Evaluation
Consider consumer use when setting shelf life
21
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Manager food safety certification improves compliance scores
Facility type% In Compliance
Difference (%)Certified Not certified
Quick serve restaurant 78.7 64.7 14.0
Full serve restaurant 66.3 56.5 9.8
Retail delis 69.7 69.6 0.1Retail meat & poultry 84.6 76.0 8.6
Retail seafood 80.3 78.9 1.4Retail produce 83.0 75.4 7.6Bold = significant difference Source: FDA 2004 www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/retrsk2.html
22
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Employee training can improve behavior
Employee training significantly improved handwashing knowledge and behavior
Roberts et al, 2008 Food Protection Trends 28(4):252-260
Hand hygiene is a leading factor contributing to illness
23
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Inspections, assessments, and audits
Typical answersTo measure compliance with food safety standardsTo help identify opportunities for improvement
Overlooked benefitTo cause a behavior change
What is the purpose of an inspection program?
24
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Elements of an effective assessment
People
Data review
Filters
Live data viewed by appropriate management
Corrective action plans on those out of specification
Positive reward for those hitting the desired levels
32
© 2008 Ecolab Inc. All rights reserved.
Concluding Remarks
Effective food safety management is a balancing act.
Requires:TimeCommitmentCommunicationTraining