FONT Phase II Clinical Trial. Justification for Novel FSGS Therapy Poor Survival for Resistant FSGS...
-
Upload
rudolf-thompson -
Category
Documents
-
view
236 -
download
0
Transcript of FONT Phase II Clinical Trial. Justification for Novel FSGS Therapy Poor Survival for Resistant FSGS...
FONT Phase II Clinical Trial
Justification for Novel FSGS TherapyPoor Survival for Resistant FSGS
44
Presler/Gipson, 2005
a. Pediatric FSGS
CR 12 12 8 5 5 PR 20 18 13 11 9 NR 28 25 20 10 9
b. Adult FSGS
Troyanov, JASN, 2005
FSGS Clinical Trial: CSA vs. MMF/ Dexamethasone
Primary Outcome
6 months
Secondary Outcome
0
26
52
78
Week
CSA MMF + Dex
ACEi
RandomizePred +ACEi
Gipson et al, 2011
Eligibility CriteriaInclusion• Age 2 – 40 years • eGFR ≥ 40 ml/min/1.73m2
• Up/c > 1.0 • Steroid resistance• Biopsy confirmed primary FSGS
Exclusion• Prior therapy CSA, Tacrolimus, MMF• Obesity• Transplant• Malignancy• Diabetes mellitus
Gipson et al, 2011
Primary Outcome: Week 52 Proteinuria
Remission
Outcome Level
MMF/DEX(n=66)
CSA(n=72)
Odds Ratio
95% CI
1 2 (3.0) 4 (5.6) 0.53 0.09 – 3.03
2 4 (6.1) 10 (13.9) 0.41 0.15 – 1.15
3 16 (24.2) 19 (26.4) 0.59 0.30 – 1.18
CR + PR 22 (33.3) 33 (45.8) 0.59 0.30 – 1.18
OR<1 favor CSAGipson, 2011
FSGS CT: Secondary Outcomes
• 6 months after immunosuppression withdrawal• Proteinuria relapse was common
(CSA 33%; MMF/DEX18%)
• No difference in proteinuria remission status
OR= 1.21 (0.56-2.66)
Gipson et al, 2011
Adverse Events
*
*
* *
*
0
5
10
15
20
25
MMF/Dex
CSA
Gipson et al, 2011
Trachtman et al, 2011 Trachtman 2011
www.fonttrial.org
Specific Aims1. To evaluate two novel therapies for resistant FSGS -- anti-TNF-α antibody and galactose against standard therapy
2. To identify one or more novel agents as candidates for future study in a Phase III randomized clinical trial
3. To develop a network of sites to foster the performance of clinical trials for this disease and other glomerular disorders
Trachtman et al, 2011
Eligibility criteria
• Age 1-50,
• GFR >40 mL/min/1.73 m2
• FSGS on bx OR genetic mutation
• Steroid resistance
• Resistance to a 2nd immunosuppression
Trachtman et al, 2011
Eligible Patients with Resistant FSGS
RANDOMIZATION
GalactoseN=17
Standard RxN=17
AdalimumabN=17
Pause for Efficacy Review
YES, continue recruitment to N=42*
NO, discontinue study arm
≥2/17 with Up/c<50% baseline and stable GFRe
FONT II REVISED PROJECT
Trachtman et al, 2011
Standard Conservative Therapy
Lisinopril
mg/day
Losartan
mg/day
Atorvastatinmg/day
≤40 kg 10 25 10
>40 kg 20 50 20
Trachtman et al, 2011
TNF- • Inflammatory cytokine
• Produced by circulating or infiltrating mononuclear cells, macrophages, and kidney mesangial cells
• Postulated mechanisms– recruitment of leukocytes to the site of glomerular injury– induction of cytokines and growth factors– generation of oxygen radicals resulting in increased
glomerular endothelial cell permeability to albumin– direct cytotoxicity to glomerular mesangial and epithelial
cells, and induction of apoptosis
• Increases in TNF- α and TNF- α mRNA described in FSGS
Trachtman et al, 2011
Phase I Adalimumab
• N=10 (4M:6F)
• Age 16.8±9.0 yr
• GFRe 105±50 mL/min/1.73 m2
• Dose 24 mg/m2 (max: 40 mg) sc q 14 d
• Up/c 15.9±10.4
Adalimumab: PKThe half life, area under the curve, and clearance were increased in proteinuric
FSGS compared with patients with rheumatoid arthritis
FSGS steady state
RA
Tmax (hr) 34.2±9.8* 130±55
Cmax (μg/mL) 12.8±8.3 13.7±2.7
T1/2 (hr) 273±402 389±71
AUC 2019±1693* 3622±587
Cl/F 53.2±43.3* 11.2±2.0
Joy, 2009
Adalimumab Safety
• 9 Adverse Events– 1 probably related: injection site reaction– No discontinuation due to adverse event
• Relationship of T1/2 to Up/c and albumin
• Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, global satisfaction)
– Scores: 61, 92, 71, 59 out of a possible 100
Phase I: Long-term follow-up
Adalimumab
(n=10)
Rosiglitazone
(n=11)Follow-up (months)
16.1±5.7 18.3±10.2
50% decline in Up/c 4 3
Progression to ESKD1 4
Stabilization in GFRe71% 56%
Trachtman, 2009
Adalimumab: Dosing
• Provided by Abbott– Injectable– 40 mg/0.8 mL – Boxes of 6 vials
• Dose: 24 mg/m2 SC Q 14 days
• Apply EMLA or ice to relieve pain
Galactose Arm Rationale
Circulating permeability factor(s) in FSGS
Permeability activity: In vitro glomerular albumin permeability (Palb) predicts recurrence.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.40.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Evidence: Early post-transplant recurrence of proteinuria Proteinuria after injection of FSGS plasma
Clinical benefit of plasmapheresis (PP)
1st & 2nd 1 PP rx IV Galactose
Palb of patient specimens
Savin VJ, et al., 2008
Permeability is increased most by serum from FSGS patients with severe disease or recurrence after
transplantation
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Norecurrence
of FSGS
Recurrenceof FSGS
Priorrecurrence
or rapidprogression
CollapsingGN,
(McCarthy)
ESRD non-glomerular
disease
Palb
11
1
1. Savin, NEJM, 1996
2. Butcher, ASN, 1998
3. McCarthy, ASN, 1997
2
3
More rapid progression to kidney failure is seen in patients with high activity (Pudur)
Palb < 0.5
Palb 0.5
Time from diagnosis to ESRD, years
Su
rviv
al d
istr
ibu
tio
n F
un
ctio
n
0.0 5 years
.25
.50
.75
1.0
Low activity, about 40% good function after 5 years
High activity, only about 25% good function after 5 years
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0
Permeability activity is decreased by galactose
• Galactose taken twice daily in water.
• Activity decreased at 2 weeks and remained low.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Palb
Pre-treatment
6 weeks
1 week
2 weeks
4 weeks
4 weeks after stopping galactose
Savin VJ, et al., 2008
Galactose and Potential Mechanisms of Action
• Permeability factor may gain access to podocyte by sugar binding.
• Galactose may block the binding between factor and podocyte.
• Factor-galactose complex may be removed by specific receptors in liver or other tissues.
FSPF
galactose galactose
galactose
Galactose receptors
FSPF-galactose complex
FSPF FSPF-galactose complex
galactose galactose
FSPF FSPF
Podocytes Filtration slits
Savin VJ, et al., 2008
Cardiotrophin-like cytokine (CLC-1) is present in plasma of a patient with recurrent FSGS
• We used galactose to purify active proteins from a patient with FSGS
• Proteins were separated on a gel.
• A band of low molecular weight protein was present.
• CLC-1 was the single cytokine identified in this material by mass spectrometry.
Patient plasma
Proteins of interest
Savin VJ, ASN 2008 (abstract)
Rat glomeruli were treated with CLC-1 in various concentrations.
CLC-1 increased permeability as does FSGS serum.
Synthesis of nephrin, the main protein of the slit-junction, is decreased.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Palb, CLC-1
*
***
* P< 0.01 vs C
CLC-1 increases permeability and decreases expression of nephrin, the main junction protein
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Per
cent
dec
reas
e vs
. con
trol
5 10 CLC [ng/mL]Savin VJ, ASN 2008 (abstract)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Pt 1 Pt 2 Pt 3 Pt 4 CLC-1
Palb Palb + anti CLC-1 mAb
Antibody to CLC-1 prevents permeability caused by patient serum or by CLC-1 itself
Anti-CLC-1 mAb vs. without mAb: Fisher exact test, p < 0.02; paired t-test, p<0.005.
Savin VJ, ASN 2008
Serum Urokinase Receptor and FSGS
Wei et al, 2011
Summary of current work about circulating factor in FSGS
• Permeability activity of plasma is highest in patients with severe disease.
• Galactose binds the active protein and can be used for purification or for therapy.
• CLC-1 is a candidate for the FSGS permeability factor – due to presence in FSGS plasma – same effects as FSGS plasma in vitro
• suPAR
GALACTOSE: Case reports
PatientAge
Gender
Prior
Rx
Bx
ResultDuration ΔPalb Outcome
1 48MPred
CsA, PE
Not
Done18 months
↓Stable GFR
PR
2 3M
Pred, Cytox
MMF, Tac
FSGS7 months
Not Done
Stable GFR
PR
3 16FPred
Tac
C1q
Neph7 months
Not
Done
Stable GFR
PR
Case 1 NDT 2009; Cases 2 and 3 Therapeutic Apheresis Dial 2011
Galactose: Safety
• IND #77,091
• 23 patients
• Duration of therapy: 28 days
• No SAE directly related to drug
• AE: abdominal pain
Galactose: Dosing
• Ferro Pfahnstiel, Inc. (Waukegan, IL)
– Powder
– 500 g in plastic container
• Dose: 0.2 g/kg/dose BID (max: 15 g BID)
• Dissolve in 15-30 mL water
• Administer 15 minutes before breakfast and dinner
FONT Trial Study SummaryVisit Study Visit
Blood and Urine Test
Quality of Life
Pregnancy Screening*
Week -4 x x x
Week 0 x x x x
Week 2 x x
Week 8 x x x
Week 16 x x x
Week 26 x x x
Month 7 x x
Month 9 x x
Month 12 x x x
Month 18 x x
Year 2 x* x
* May be phone follow up
FONT Study Network16 approved sites
– Cohen Children’s Medical Center– University of Michigan– Cincinnati– Boston Children’s– University of Miami– University of Kansas– MUSC– Stollery– Emory– Oregon– Children’s Mercy– Texas Tech El Paso– Nationwide Children’s– Carolinas– Mayo Clinic– Columbia