Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2019-07-17 · Following this...

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

FLORENCE PITAK, as Executrix for the Estate of JOHN PITAK. i Index No.: 109974/2000;and FLORENCE PITAK, Individually j 122204/1999

Plaintiff,

- against -

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.C and S., INC., et ah,

Defendants,

NYCALI.A.S Part 50

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

_, 2016

0WM

Hft l

Fiaiik Ouiz, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

<><c\

SO ORDERED,.

latitat B. HomfiaivAttorney for Defer,

ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank StreetWhite Plains, New York 10606(914) 949-2909

3HomPe^^^MoultonTXS^Cv-G0

ItMlb NYSSUP« V1STJDJUN 01 2016

{V0323945.1}

Dices'


EILEEN DITULLIO, as Executrix for the Estate of VINCENT A.DITULLIO and EILEEN DITULLIO, Individually,

Plaintiff,

- against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et ah,

Defendants.

Index No.: 190228/2010


NYCALI.A.S Part 50










^ , 2016

fL.mmH&-

WEITZ & LUXENBERG.P.cA^ ^700 BroadwayNew York, NY 100G& ,V(212) 558-5500 ^ ^

SO ORDERED, /7^—

;<?&

Laura B. Hollman,Attorney for DefenvamECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank StreetWhite Plains, New York 10606(914) 949-2909

- Hon ^eter H. Moulton, J.S.C.Uhli<* RECEIVED

NYS SUPREME CT-CIVIL-1ST JD

JUN 01 2016HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

{V0323880.1}

Vi


X

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL

F' L E DJUH 7 m

X

ROBERT W. LEAHY, Index No. 112943-04

Plaintiff(s),-against-

A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., includingCBS CORPORATION,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by

merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter

"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York,New York

(is- n« iCp

'X)

Charles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003

SO ORDERED,


Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102

rr

ri n:;i T - :J

i

. I

83228690vl


xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL

F l l- £ DC°UN^Q%o,ncs

X

PATRICIA A. LEAVY, as Administratrix for the Estate of Index No. 109164-04KENNETH LEAVY and PATRICIA A. LEAVY, Individually,


NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYA.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., including JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERCBS CORPORATION,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by







i ~~7 ~ I G

^ u.

Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003

SO ORDERED,„

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th Floof ~ ~

Newark, NJ 07102 ; „u

Hon. Peter H. Moultonu,

}

/

6

83228690v1



x

GIOVANNA LUCENTE and JOSEPH LUCENTE, JR., index No.

F"- e0CO

JUHl 7 *°K

116165-04

-against-Plaintiff(s),

A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., including NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYCBS CORPORATION, JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.x


merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation,f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter






Cvs -n


SO ORDERED,.


^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton/I

U.2 }

J83228690VI



x

Engine

LOUIS MATTIELLI and MARIE MACRE, as Co-Executors of Index No. 109544-04the Estate of Domenic Mattielli, and FANNIE MATTIELLI,Individually,

Plaintiff(s),-against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERA.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,et al., includingCBS CORPORATION,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by



Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,




i^ ' ji

Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,


Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd. r-One Newark Center- 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102

/ a

83228690vl


IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

DAVID C. NIEMCZYK,,

xNYCAL

x

F / L E DJW* 11 2016

COUNTNmfo%° oe

Index No. 100336-03



Defendants.


x


merger to CBS Corporation,a Pennsylvania corporation,f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter

"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice





Qs. i'i.U

Charles Ferguson,Esq. ^Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

t*

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center-16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

83228690vl



F / L B DJ W l 7 m

X

DORIEL EDWARDS, Index No. 105165-03

Plaintiff(s),100731-gX^

-against-

A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,et al., including NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYCBS CORPORATION, JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.X





and there being no opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,all claims and cross claims against defendant



(\v n - i u


SO ORDERED,

Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 0710^_

/ u ,'

Hon. Peter H. Moulton 'W 0 5-V. ; /

-iij83228690V1


F l L E DJUN J 7 2616

X

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL

x

ALLEN E. BLANCHARD, as Administrator for theEstate of EVERETT A. BLANCHARD, and ALLEN E.BLANCHARD, as Executor for the Estate ofLUCY BLANCHARD,

Index No. 100085-03

Plaintiff(s),NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER-against-






ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,all claims and cross claims against defendant



rt- ( (o

Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 Broadway

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation

New York,NY 10003


83228690v1

F I L E DJUN 17 2016


COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

x

CONNIE CURTIS, as Administratrix for the Estate of SALLYLAROSE,


A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.f includingCBS CORPORATION,

tNY«L %*<fc,

Index No. 19W7I/08*

%NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.x




Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs7 complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,




r>c - i Co

f "N


SO ORDERED,TH Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center-16?1!FloorNewark,NJ 07102

v.

jysyiL ID //

82640541vl



F I L E DJUN 17 2Q|6

COUNTY eu?flK'g ©taF,eeX

CALLO, DOMENICK, Index No. 100087-03


A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.# includingCBS CORPORATION,


Defendants.X

WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation,a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by

merger to CBS Corporation,a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter



ORDERED,that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant



to-

i\Charles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003

SO ORDERED,.


T Hon. Peter H. MoultonG

83228690v1


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK COUNTY SUBK'8 ©PFI6E

x NIWmmIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL

x

MICHAEL D1GIROLOMO, Index No. 190089-12




Defendants.x






Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York,New York

(Vs- rv ( C>

C:;

Charles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,.

Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102 rrr

~ri Hon. Peter H. Moulton

(i i2^ is

)/

- j

83228690v1



x

ROBERT F. NUGENT,



Defendants.x

NYCAL

Index No.

%

100287-03*+% •%








c' ’ •••

''- s :' - • / \


SO ORDERED,.

Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102

Hon. Peter H. Moulton/f" -

L .

JUH G 2 ZG1S

1i

/

83228690v1


IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx

NYCAL

x

BRITT L. MORTON, Index No. 100083-03




Defendants.x

WHEREFORE; defendant CBS Corporation,a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by







ryvn. i^


Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102

83228690vl



x

SUZANNE LEITHNER,



Defendants.x

YCAL

Inv Mn





Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,




CJS- O.K?

f \


SO ORDERED,.c Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102 /5'iTti "

m e s: A ,U)

: /o //

L I

- - J

83228690v1



x

NYCALc%, %

x

ROSE MARIE NASSO, Individually and as Personal Representative index No.for the Estate of DOMENIC NASSO,

190181-^60^/V'cePlaintiffs,

-against-NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY


A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,


merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation

(hereinafter "CBS") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs7 complaint against defendant CBS with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CBS be

and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

OlfOtfHsCynthia JSedgwick LLK

Attorneys for CBS Corporation, a Delawarecorporation,f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by mergerto CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation,f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation1085 Raymond Boulevard,16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102

-J

Hon. Peter M. Moulton



x

NYCAL

X

ROSE MARIE NASSO,Individually and as Personal Representative index No. 190181-2009for the Estate of DOMENIC NASSO,

Plaintiffs,




WHEREFORE,defendant Perkins Engines Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-

entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

defendant Perkins Engines Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


Perkins Engines Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,New York 10003

SO ORDERED,

0l/C 2ji L


Cynthia J. Cho, (E^q.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor Perkins Engines Inc.1085 Raymond Boulevard,16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102

E>!(a jICo

j J^ C 2 ;: rj ; s

— 1


IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to;

MICHAEL CULLEN, AS EXECUTOR FOR THEESTATE OF ARTHUR CULLEN, AND ALMACULLEN, INDIVIDUALLY

F't E oLA.S, Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No: 190075/12


WHEREFORE, defendant CerlainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212. dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CerlainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposit ion thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, ail claims and cross claims against

defendant CerlainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: NewimuDZlJ

rk. New York. 2016

2-23U::;:::

Charles M, Ferguson. Esq.WEITZ & LUXEMBURG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York , NY 10003( 212 ) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavk& Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAYITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys ibr CertainTepd Corporation '

116 East 27m Street. \2lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

/J

SO ORDERED.Hon. Peter I F Moulton, J.S.C.



This Document Relates to:

LEONARD J. LUBNIEWSKI AND MARYLUBNIEWSKI

^4.JlJN 1 7

C°Ul\ITyc

£O

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.) %Index No: 190378/2011 ^NO OPPOSITION SUMlV&fej-.JUDGMENT MOTION ANDWfeeR

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,



defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York2016

b $M AEsq. QWft fLU KliUu

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yayitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12*FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.




LEONARD J. LUBNIEWSKI AND MARYLUBNIEWSKI

%X*/j

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P. ) *4^. 4,Index No: 190378/2011 *NO OPPOSITION SUM]V&It%£,JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Lennox Industries Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Lennox Industries Inc., with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant Lennox Industries Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York/10a y^ , 2016

M 1M.1A jCfinrln M^crm/noV r ~ q j r » TT\1 [ 0f ( H c iWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavftz, Esq.

DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Lennox Industries Inc.,116 East 27th Street, 12l1' FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

JP/J)//(oSO ORDERED,




HERMAN N. BRESSEL AND FRANCOISEBRESSEL

A,4% %

NYCAL >I.A.S. Part 50 *%-(Moulton, P.)Index No: 190112/10 ^NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation

(“ Dana Companies” ) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant

Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkWla^ lS , 2016

P

.isish&rfOTisuirBpsui, Esq. llLW)ttv| Pft iUcLfsiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavi/z, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Co tnpanies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, U LHon. Peter H. Moulton




NIKI PETRONE AS PROPOSED EXECUTRIXFOR THE ESTATE OF ROSE M. PETRONE

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

°OUj^ U17

'Nry ZQl6

Index No: 118275/2002


WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,


defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York£3 2016

Charles M. Fcrafeon;Esq.i D g i i\i aWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

' I /1

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLP


Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

b j(0 f/ io

rsSO ORDERED,





NIKI PETRONE AS PROPOSED EXECUTRIXFOR THE ESTATE OF ROSE M. PETRONE

ANYCAL cI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No: 118275/200Z Q

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY^JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation

(“ Dana Companies” ) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant

Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation (“ Dana Companies” ), with prejudice,



defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation (“ Dana Companies” ), be and

the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York7 R 2016

V. A . , 1 /1 . I A\

f !

x

Gh esJ^EfilgWi^sq. L' O&Cit toWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.


Judith A. Yavitz, Esq. \DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.kb>hu>: j 1 ]SO ORDERED,


XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

IMOGENE ARONE, as Personal Representative for theEstate of RALPH ARONE,

X

NYCAL

^ I L 5 o**i *»*SSBSs®***

rveut,Index No.: 190107/2009

Plaintiff(s),

-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER


Defendants.Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

By:

^mwicl^lffll, Esq.

700 B\Wpway JNew York, New York 10003(212) 6(15-6200

Dated: New York,.New YorkS fz-H!'

SO ORDERED:

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC

By: . cs Gaurav K. Talwar, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, Fifth FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

"1

LH >|

yu/bHon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.


X


IN RE: NEW YORK CITY :ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

XMADELINE ZACCHEO, as Administratrix for the :Estate of SALVATORE QUATTROCCHI, :

NYCALCOUNTY CLERK'® OPPIQE

NSW YORK

Index No.: 190240/2010

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,et al.Defendants.


Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

X




thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims



’n/ ylzjKoWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC

SuZ£

J \

Ratcliffe, Esq. Gaurav K. Talwar, Esq.

700 BroadwkyNew York, New York 10003(212) 605-6200


SO ORDERED:


p-'--

- f

J


FBW39133/Legal/nosjm/NOVEMBER 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XTHOMAS O’CONNOR,

Plaintiff(s),

*'4C0(J>

JlJ/ y 17*0'Nry

?oie


-against- IndexNo,: 112730/00 &122202/99

A.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.. NYCALI.A.S. Part^' SO

Defendant(s),X

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary


dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with



defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz 8L Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003<\

GdikiCharles Neal, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDEREDVfc> w n

.! < ; 5

L5S — i


- xIN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:X

F"- e0J U N > r mC0U/V7YO

NYCAL ^yf^CeI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190108/11

Eithne Brennan, Individually and as Executrix of the Estateof Edmond Brennan,

Plaintiffs,against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

Crane Co., et al.,

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendant Otis Elevator Company , hereby requests summary judgmentin the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Otis Elevator Company, with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Otis Elevator Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York

6 h l ( fc

Kevin Berry, Esq.Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer PAAttorneys for Plaintiff110 William StNew York, NY 10038

Efik DiMarco, Esq,

Gordon & Rees LLPAttorney for DefendantOtis Elevator Company1 Battery Park Plaza, 28th FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,.

^HON, PETER H. MOULTON, J.S.C.klkflk

NA/27633015V. I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S, Part 50(Moulton, P.)

m11 weCOUNTY Cl en

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 121982/99, 107864/00

LOUIS A. LIPA, JR.AND

DIANA LIPA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,



defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and


PV* , 2016

AttornlyTdM^intiffsLouis A. Lipa, Jr. and Diana LipaWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Kewyann-ML Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H, Moulton

Lie-

1-26037AS




CRESSER, BERNICE, et al

Plaintiff(s),

v.

WHITING CORPORATION, et al

Defendants.

-x NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

- x

O '<Index No.: 113071/1998

\%

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTWHITING CORPORATION

-Xi

WHEREFORE, Defendant Whiting Corporation hereby requests summary


dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Whiting Corporation with prejudice, and there


ORDERED, that upon notice to all Co-Defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant Whiting Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

New York, New York

Dated:

Adam S. DrckskfTA* 0£ CIXIO

WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

Zhanna A. LehrmanfEsq.

WINSTON & STRAWN LLPAttorneys for Defendant Whiting Corp.200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166D: (212) 294-6607F: (212) 294-4700 j

I U H o H O I S /CtVii /


AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE

I, Shanna A. Lehrman, state that I am an attorney in good standing and admitted to

practice in the courts of the State of New York. On June 1, 2016, I served a copy of the

foregoing Defendant's Notice of No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion and Order and No

Opposition Summary Judgment Motion and Order upon the following counsel:

1. Lindsay M. Decicco, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, LLP700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorney for Plaintiff

2. All Defense Counsel in the New York City Asbestos Litigation

I hereby affirm the foregoing statements to be true under the penalties of perjury.

Dated: June 1, 2016

New York, NY

WINSTON & STRAWN LLPAttorneys for Defendant Whiting Corp.200 Park AvenueNew York, NY [email protected]: (212) 294-6607F: (212) 294-4700


- x NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK CITY I.A.S. Part 50

ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Moulton)x


BIGAJ, LINDA, et al

Plaintiff(s),

v.


Defendants.

J^ l 7 ^ oC°uNryn 2016

Index No.: 115015/1998

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTWHITING CORPORATION

-X



dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant Whiting Corporation with prejudice, and there



against Defendant Whiting Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

New York, New York

Dated: $ /zJj jib

v) «asOCX

IWAtt700New

L & LUXENBERG;ys for Plaintiff3adway

Fork, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

“Shanna A. Lehrma]

WINSTON & STRAWN LLPAttorneys for Defendant Whiting Corp.200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166D: (212) 294-6607F: (212) 294-4700

i

on. Peter H. MoultonWN o i m

L:






1. Jason Yampolsky, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, LLP700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorney for Plaintiff



Dated: June 1, 2016

New York, NY

WINSTON & STRAWN LLPAttorneys for Defendant Whiting Corp,

200 Park AvenueNew York, NY [email protected]: (212) 294-6607F: (212) 294-4700


— - XTn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION_ — X

This document relates to:

NYCALI.A.S. Part ieT(Moulton, P)

Index No.: 112741/QJ> 106578/02114779/04

DAVID JOSEPH BARNES and TERRY L. BARNES,

Plaintiff,

-against-

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.

Defendant. — X_

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER

COMPANY, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: ftUtj A , 2016Harrison, New York

jElTZ crre feNBERG^.C.IAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayMew York, New York 10003/2/12)558-5500(7SO ORDERED. — -Honorable Peter H, Moulton

°Oo, 1? oRussell S. Jamisbn, tisq.MARIN GOODMAN. LLP.Attorneys for Lr&JeipilatitKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck AvenueHarrison, New York 10528(914) 412-7300 •—I T

hjloflb \lU) I

I : .' 1'; - iv ’ ;:o !6

L!I:S


IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

ANTHONY J. DI MONTE and MARY DIMONTE,

Plaintiffs),

X00

X

sc

-<:x> 1

"f||—m

NYCAL 0fxleracar- 0

I.A.S. P a r t S'O ^Ion. Slitiii y Klein Ikiller)

-against-

A.C. and S. INC, (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et ah,

Index No.: 118569-98

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: l l & l l f aNew York, New York

Wk^Than Alvara3han Alvarado, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

NAJLXA

-Hon. Sherry Klein Ilcitlcr

KiVsteh Alford Kneis, Esq.K<^L GATES LLP

tomeys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

Li m s i mHON.PETERH.MOULTON


IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

xNYCAL

CQI.A.S. Partpt^ S"0

*>/

ox

Index No. 190374/09

NO OPPOSITIONMARIO RIVADENEYRA SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND ORDER

x

WHEREFORE, Defendant E, I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defcndants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant E. I du Pont de Nemours and Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.

Dan New York. NqwYorkJanuary 7, 2 0 1 5 /

Chris Romanelli, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaititiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 681-1575

j -TA / '

-c . c/ / iDavid J . Goodearl, Esq.LEADER & BERKON LLPAttorneys far £, /. du Pont de Nemours and Company630 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10017(212) 486-2400

SO ORDERED,./44en. Sherry Klein -Heitto-HON.PETERH.MOULTON

JQated:: iijlal,Ik. m77

/j


MARGARET J. KOSIBA, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of RONALD Z.KOSIBA, INDEX NO. 126710-2002

Plaintiff , NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-against- F I L E DA.C. and S„INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et al., JUN 1 7 2016

Defendants. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

WHEREFORE, defendant, DEERE & COMPANY, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, DEERE & COMPANY, with prejudice in this action,



defendant, DEERE & COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500Attorneys for Plaintiff

666 Fifth Avenue, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10103(212) 753-5000Attorneys for Defendant, De&

SO ORDERED:

HON.PETERH.MOULTON




CRESSER, HARRY, et al

Plaintiff(s),

v.


x NYCAL 0I.A.S. Part 50 %(Moulton)

x

Index No.: 112095/1998g£% r;a

NO OPPOSITION %SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTWHITING CORPORATION

Defendants. :--- X



dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Whiting Corporation with prejudice, and there



against defendant Whiting Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

New York, New York

Dated: 1 ,

MMAdam S^DuuLtjlcjf , Ejqr*

»v\ - OedfcdoWEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500


iSnanna A. Lehrman, Elsqf "7

WINSTON & STRAWN LLPAttorneys for Defendant Whiting Corp.200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166D: (212) 294-6607 xF: (212) 294-4700 j [p jj :,

I J ,JN 01 2016 IiN Y S S L






1. Lindsay M. Decicco, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, LLP700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorney for Plaintiff



Dated: June 1, 2016

New York, NY

WINSTON & STRAWN LLPAttorneys for Defendant Whiting Corp.

200 Park AvenueNew York, NY [email protected]: (212) 294-6607F: (212) 294-4700


NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION


ESTATE OF JOSEPH C. MCKENDRY

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 113335/01

F I L E D-W J 7 2M5


WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests


dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,


defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with


Dated: New York, New York5" f 4 2016

tA\t 3Aa> &Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Joseph C. McKendryWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Alysa Koloms, Esq.Attorney for DefendantSafeguard Industrial Equipment Co.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, .

Hon. Peter H. Moulton6/(o//C?

324-6295


ASBESTOS LITIGATION




Index No.: 113335/01,

u


WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary


plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,



defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York£(( 4 2016

Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Joseph C. McKendryWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

r\K JKeri^aaoJ^Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, .( Hon. Peter H. Moulton

(c

[ f ]i

I 0 1

~7/

f

1122-19132


ASBESTOS LITIGATION



NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.) - ' v

% \Index No.: 113335/01/^ %

NO OPPOSITION SUM1V&06V *JUDGMENT MOTION ANf)%DER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there



defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkr ( ( t 2016

ERTT-ACORYTGUTAttorney for Plaintiffs C— ^Estate of Joseph C. McKendryWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

non. Peter H. Moulton

!T:?

i— ...

1235-18597

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK F I L E DIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION




Index No.: 113335/01,

JUN 1 7 20)6

COUNTY eLWiOPFfGiNIWVDRSK


WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary


plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,



defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York2016

i

fcfclL AGe> fe> (Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Joseph C. McKendryWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, .

Hon. Peter hi. MouitorT

M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

/6

J

2383-23573


XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

LIONEL J. OSSE,Plaintiff(s),

X

0^ 1 1 20 ,6

mcAL couwvcIndex No.: 190052/2012

-against-

AERCO INTERNATIONAL, et al.,

Defendants.


Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50




thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims



jl (y

WEITZ &AUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys fbr Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC

Chris Romanelli, Esq. Kate H. Romick, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 605-6200



SO ORDERED: y/6 . ;o

Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.J


IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This 'Document Relates to:

LUIGI GARRITANO and CESIRAGARRITANO

X\%cNYCAL ^I.A.S. Pari 50

(Moulton. P.)Index No: T 90.089/11

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide -Corporation hereby requests summary judgment ,

in the above“ entitled ease,, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against defendant 'Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,. all claims and. cross claims against ,

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.


fhoyo . 2Qi 6

w .

f

Charles NT Ferguson, Esq.VYEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York. NY 100381212 ) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavirz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVfTZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbine. Corporation116 East 27th Street, I 2lhlfborNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300 .

j

SO ORDERED.Hon. Peter H, Moulton

A



x

ROSE MARIE NASSO, Individually and as Personal Index No.Representative for the Estate of DOMENIC NASSO,

190181-200|?

Plaintiffs,



A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al..

WHEREFORE, defendant Foster Wheeler, LLC hereby request summary judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

defendant Foster Wheeler, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,all claims and cross claims against defendant Foster

Wheeler, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


Weitz 8Attorne700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Cynthia J. Gtf o, Esq.Sedgwick£LPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler, LLC1085 Raymond Boulevard,16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102

l



Index No. 190304/2011

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER


COUNTY 0L8RKS OPPlCiNSW YORK

WHEREFORE, defendant Perkins Engines, Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitledcase, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs5 complaint against defendant PerkinsEngines, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant PerkinsEngines, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

MICHAEL GAGLIANO as Executor of the Estate ofCARYL R. GAGLIANO and MICHAEL GAGLIANOIndividually,

Plaintiffs),

-against-

BORG WARNER CORPORATION, et al., IncludingPerkins Engines, Inc.

Defendants.

Dated: New York, New YorkV

tULeDanny R. Kraft, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg P.C>-

Attomeys for Plaintiff700 Broadway---^New York^New York 10003

Shaun Bean, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneys for Perkins Engines, Inc.1085 Raymond BoulevardOne Newark Center — 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102

SO ORDEREDHon. Peter H. Moulton n~si/ /VVS O ;

JUN E A Iv 2 / n -;b

83283471vl



x

\%

FRANK FERLITO, as Administrator for the Estate of FRANK index No. 190070/08FERLITO, and JOANNE DEMICHELE, a Executrix for theEstate of CONNIE FERLITO, Individually,

Plaintiffs), N0 OPPOSITION SUMMARY-against- JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER


Defendants.x








63 - t~i4 Cs>

/

IsCharles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg,P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,.

Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16|^eoiu___

INewark, NJ 07102

C Hon. Peter H. Moulton

i/

I JUNQ 2 ? r! jgV

82640582vl



x

F"- e o

RITA BREITLAUCH, as Administratrix for the Estate of KURT index No. 190098-09BREITLAUCH, and RITA BREITLAUCH, Individually,

Plaintiffs),-against-


Defendants.x

WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation,f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by







CYV ( u

Charles Ferguson, Esq,Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003

Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102 r--

SO ORDEREDHon. Peter H. Moulton

6A//(, r*

83228690vl



x

FRANCESCO COSENTINO,



Defendants.x

NYCAL

Index No.









- 1 C g



SO ORDERED,.k /b/fto

C Hon. Peter H. Moulton ' ' '• :

'

0

j83228690v1



x

^ J L E DJUN 1 7 2016

C0UNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

LOUIS DOLAK,


A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., IncludingCBS CORPORATION,

Defendants.

Index No. 116022-07


x








OS' i^ f Co. . -V



SO ORDERED,.^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton

&

83228690vl



p l LJUH l 7

COUNTY &

X

THERESA SLEVIN as Executrix for the Estate of JOHN J. Index No. 108924-04SLEVIN, and THERESA SLEVIN, Individually,


NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYA.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„including JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERCBS CORPORATION,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation,a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by







&>- 1-7 - 1 U


Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center-16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102

SO ORDERED, & /h i/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton

83228690vl



x

MARIE KAPETENAKIS, as the Administratrix of the Estate of index No.LILY PETRELIS,

F UJUN 1 7

COUNTY2016

115617-04



Defendants.x




Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs7 complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,




\~i - i^r.S J


SO ORDERED.Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloofNewark, NJ 07102 /

kyk//6n

J

/ '

J

83228690v1



x

Co

ERNEST F. RISTO, Index No. 106524-04


A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„includingCBS CORPORATION,


Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by



Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs7 complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,





\

j-'V

Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102

SO ORDERED,Hon, Peter H. Mou ton

' 2 . 3

83228690vl



x

F I L E DJlJN 1 7 2016

CORNELIUS COTTER as Personal Representative for the Index No. 107035-04Estate of MADELINE C. COTTER, and CORNELIUS COTTER,Individually,

Plaintiff(s),-against- MO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERA.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., includingCBS CORPORATION,

Defendants.x








as- n- iG

— w- /


SO ORDERED,.Z

Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102

C /£//£>Hon. Peter H. Moulton

83228690v1



F I L E D1 7 2016

COUNTY CLIHK’iOFFICENEWYOflK

DONALD P. DAILEY and KATHLEEN DAILEY,

X

Index No. 116294-04


A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., including NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYCBS CORPORATION, JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.x







n< 1C

• w ~ {Charles Ferguson,Esq. 'Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003

1Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102

SO ORDERED, 2.Hon. Peter H. Moulton

f

J83228690v1



F I L E DJUN I 7 2016

x

MICHAEL H. DESANTIS, Index No. 109921-04

-against-Plaintiffs),



Defendants.X








OS> - ( -7 ,- ( Cs.

\ , >Charles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003



y/6

J83228690v1



F I L E DJUN 1 7 2016

COUNTY CLIRK'S ©PPlGiNEW YORKX

DIANGELO,NEIL A., Index No. 112944-04




Defendants.x








- ri. (c.Xr;/ - i

X



SO ORDERED.£

Hon. Peter H. Moulton^ i d

j83228690v1



x

F I L E DJUN 1 7 2016

COUNTS CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

JOHN J. DOHERTY and KATHLEEN DOHERTY,

Plaintiffs,•against-

A.C. & S. INC., et al., including CBS CORPORATION, a DelawareCorporation, f/k/a VIACOM INC. successor by merger to CBSCorporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a WestinghouseElectric Corporation,

Index Nos. 111230-01;123065-01



merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation

{hereinafter "Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendantWestinghouse with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, ail claims and cross claims against defendant


Dated: New York, New YorkOs.n. ( Csrp*-

Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff (s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-9536

SO ORDERED,

MichaelW. Tanenbaum, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation> a Delawarecorporation,f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by mergerto CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation,f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102


I



x

CAROLINE FLEMING, as Administratrix for the Estate of Index No.QUINTINA CHECO,

F I L E0JUN 1

«-aar*190106-11

Plaintiff(s), N0 OPPOSITION SUMMARY-against- JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

A.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et al., includingCBS CORPOATION, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a VIACOMINC. successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a PennsylvaniaCorporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor bymerger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation

(hereinafter "Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant

Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant


New York, New York fn ;Dated:

Charles Ferguson,Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-9536

SO ORDERED,.

Micnael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneys for CBS Corporation, a Delawarecorporation,f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by mergerto CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation,f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16thFloorNewark,NJ 07102

Hon. Peter H. Moulton f /h}

F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK


xNYCAL

JUN 1 7 2016


x2doo

EDWARD MURRAY and MELANIE L. MURRAY, Index No. -3301052011:

Plaintiffs,

-against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

A.C.&S. INC. et al.,




Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantWestinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated * Mou/ Vnrl/ Matir Vi-irU

Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 Broadway

Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneys for CBS Corporation, a DeIawarecorporation,f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by mergerto CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation,f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102

New York, New York 10003-9563

O Hon. Peter H. Moulton

F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JUN 17

X

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL rOUNTY CLJRK1® 0FFIG6^ NEW YORK

X

SYLVIA BRADOR PENA as Personal Representative for the index No. 117056-04Estate of CARLOS BRADOR CASTILLO,



Defendants.x

WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation,a Delaware corporation,f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by



Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,




Os - vl - ( Cp

Charles Ferguson, Esq. \Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003

\



83228690V1



F I L E DJUNI7 m

COUNn CLERK'S OFFICENew YORK CE

X

BOBRA WHITE FERGUSON, Individually and as Index No. 190110-09Administratrix for the Estate of BERT THOMAS FERGUSON,







and there being no opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant


oS- ( 0?

^ JCharles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th.FloorNewark,NJ 07102

SO ORDERED,7A


f<L^AjL/A>

83228690v1



x

LYNNE STACK as Proposed Administratrix for the Estate of index No.PAUL STACK and LYNNE STACK, Individually,

F I L E D1 7 2016

COUNTY ClgRKg OFFlCPNEW YORK ' E

100340-03



Defendants.x








to- n < ICP

Charles Ferguson,Esq. "Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102


j

J83228690v1

i !

!!! :

1

CLB'568 l2/iega!/nosjm/MAV 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XGEORGE J. CORNISH, JR„

E DJtJ« I 7 2016

C0UN z°

Plaintiff(s),

-againsT

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et aL

Defendant(s) ,


Index No.: 190268/09

NYCAL ^I.A.S. Part 3/0 O'O

-X

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary


dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,



defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

L>Frank Ortiz, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

ShawnetteTTbftf. Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED, lo/Uluii. SlicTiyitleiii-IIeitlar

H0N PEfER H.MOULTON

g/6/

nJhl Q 2

F I L E DX: FB H /32500/dismissaIs/nosim/September 2015


XALICE M. PETERSON, Individually and asAdministratrix of the Estate of HOWARD PETERSON,

Plaintiff(s),

- against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO, et ah;

Defendants. — xWHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary


dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC, with



defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with


JUN 1UQ16

COUNTV CLERK'S OWC6C NEW YORK


Index No.: 100976/98

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

QUJM Wgt^Esq .Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Brian Feld, Esq.Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED,/Hon. Peter Moulton

h/ L/jJ^^ J -

J U N 0 2 2016: " " f. n' r . Cr j f-J - CIVIL

A:CLB/60052./disniissaIs/nosjnt/SEPTEMBER2015F I L E D


-X

JUN 1 7 2016COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUE ANNE MORRIS, as Administratrix for the Estate of NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYRICHARD E. MORRIS, JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDERPlaintiff(s),

- against - Index No.: 112359/00

A.C. & S. INC., et ah; NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

Defendants.•X

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary


dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,



defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Attorneys for Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

F I L E DX:FBW/40r74.Mismissak/nosim/SEPTEMBER2015


XSUE ANNE MORRIS, as Administratrix for the Estate of NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYRICHARD E. MORRIS, JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

JUN 1 7 2QI6


Plaintiff(s),

- against - Index No.: 112359/00

A..C. & S. INC., et al.; NYCAL

Defendants.X

I.A.S. Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary


dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with



defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with


K , Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Brian Feld, Esq.Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED,1n

Hon. Peter Moulton

io rc

Lr.JUN 0 2 2016

PACT 50- CIVIL

!

i'

M;!

CLBjASI 8/iegal/nosjm/MAY 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XANDREW KUTKO, JR„

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et aL

Defendant(s),

F I L E DJUN 1 7 2016

COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORKNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Index No.: 190020/10

NYCAL^ ST AI.A.S. Paiyo b o

-X



dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC, with prejudice,



defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

.f

tShawnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED,Sherry Klein Heitlcr

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

fa(a w

q2

: '

i!

! i

CLB56814/leeal/nosjm/MA Y 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK— - XTHOMAS KOWALSKI,

F I L E DJUN 1 7 2016


Plaintiffs),

-against-


Index No.: 190337/09

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et aL

Defendant(s),

NYCALI.A.S. PartjJO

-X



dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,



defendants CLEAVER BROOKS. INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

tomey for PlaintiffFrank Ortl!Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

— T 4Shawnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED,J£w*rShui) Klcili-Heider

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

yy ,yJUN G 2 2016

L-ZZj CH

3:.‘r ”

*"T - CIVIL

i

i

hr3 -' t r'

;;

ii

i i

I !


CLB56S15/leeal/nosjm/MAY 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XMELVYN MECKEL,

Plaintiffs),



-against- Index No, ; 190411/09

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et ah, NYCAL_

I.A.S. Part yf 0Defendant(s),

- -X


: :

!!

!!

E1

i .

ii


dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,



defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

FranPTjrtiz. Es^Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Shawnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York. New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED, f£/%(oHem rrv Klein Hcitter

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

F I L E D

:i

; i

CLB5,6824/legal/nosjm,MAY 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

CHARLES fi. MORIARTY,-X

Plaintiffs),



-against- IndexNo.: 117523/99 &4141s$m-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,

Defendant(s),X

NYCAL ,I.A.S. Part^ef ^O


I judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,i f

i dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC, with prejudice,

I and there being no opposition thereto,

! ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

jj defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

i: iii

without costs.

ojjX /O'jrikOrtiz^ Esq. ,,A *imey for Plaintiff

Frank Ortiz, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz 8L Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

L>tShawnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER BROOKS, INC.Barry' McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED.B&n. Sherry Klcill-Hemef—

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

SUPREME COURT OF TEE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

FLORENCE PITAK, as Executrix for the Estate of JOHN PITAK.and FLORENCE PITAK, Individually

- against -

A.C and S., INC., et al.,

Plaintiff,

C0(jj

Defendants.o

Index No.: 109974/2000;122204/1999

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTiyOTION AND ORDER

NYCALI.A.S Part 50










2016y/z?

Fiaiik Ox Liz, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

^aura^B. HomnanyEsqYAttorney for DefendantECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank StreetWhite Plains, New York 10606(914) 949-2909

SO ORDERED, Din^on. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

{V0323945.1}

H i r n T


xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:x


FRANCES A. BARRIO, as Executrix for theEstate of EDWARD S. BARRIO, and FRANCESA. BARRIO, Individually,

Index No. 02/11315302/107221

Plaintiff

-against-

NATIONAL GRIDNATIONAL GRID

4J(Jty j

Co^£O

7 2Qw NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL

GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a

LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and

cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are

hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New .York2J±t£_, 201L

MMg|Esq.mfen LLPifendantGENERATION LLC

Ma feitysr Esq JoSor\w pWEimZV SJ LUXENBERG, P.C.Atnoiuadys for Plaintiffs100\Btt<fadwayNew rcark, NY 10003(212) p58-5500

6 ib

John J. FCullen aAttorneyNATIONAL44 Wall :New York, NY 10005(212)732-2000


i :

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK— xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGAnON :

This Document Relates To:-x

ROSERITA SCHRETTNER, as Executrix for theEstate of ALFRED F. SCHRETTNER andROSERTTA SCHRETTNER, Individually,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

Plaintiffs)vs.

A C & S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et aL,

FI Le i: JUN 1 7 2016

115622/01

Defendants).COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

-X NEW YORKWHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,

\!

:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and :without costs.Dated: New York,New York

2016

By: Prank M. Qifeis Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Counsel for:Plaintiffs

By: AdamL. Sandler, Esq.AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016

1T: 212-593-6700F: 212-593-6970

SO ORDERED: ,t HON. PETER H. MOULTON&

/j ,s® e 3

L 6 ;

J

V\i l

1

(01813560JX)CX }


I

Index No.: 190228/2010


b NYCALI.A.S Part 50


EILEEN DITULLIO, as Executrix for the Estate of VINCENT A.DITULLIO and EILEEN DITULLIO, Individually,

Plaintiff,

- against - ^A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., J( j/\i i ,Co/

72016DefenaMV yo - i









y/t°j 2016

/LmmWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Laura B. Hollman,Attorney for DefenaetmECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank StreetWhite Plains,New York 10606(914) 949-2909

SO ORDERED, .HomPeter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

{V0323880.1}

0oS7 ci

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY



X

X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Judge Moulton)

Index No.: 190028/11Robert Polotaye and Sandra Polotay^Plaintiff(s),# t

- against - %» J^OOPPOSITIONsifi^IARY JUDGMENT

*?gn. MOTION AND ORDERA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al./C/*

®

Defendants.X

I

WHEREFORE, defendant HOWDEN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

i/s/h/a HOWDEN BUFFALO, INC., Individually and as Successor in

Interest to FB Sturtevant, The Howden Buffalo Group and Buffalo

Fan, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant HOWDEN NORTH

AMERICA, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all

claims and cross claims against defendant HOWDEN NORTH AMERICA,

INC. be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dat^d: New York, New YorkL I7 , 2016

Cj/yl l/>Weitz &

Esq.Luxenberg, P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)Robert Polotaye700 BoradwayNew York, New York 10003

"efhrey Fegan, Esq.Cullen and Dykman LLP

forneys for DefendantHowden North America, Inc.44 Wall StreetNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000Our File No.: 1123,1^111

Hon. Peter H.

_Jp//0jMoulton, J.S.C. /

/ /(

JU!y Q $

Lffl/5 /

;

So Ordered:


xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:


DAVID JOSEPH BARNES and TERRY L. BARNES,

Plaintiff(dN •

against * LfQJ( , NO

17m

Index No.: 04/11477902/11274102/106578

NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/h/aNATIONAL GRID, et al., BOUNTYGig

OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Defendantsx

WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL

GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a

LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and

cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are


Dated: New York ew York/Hy U, 201 fo

John J.I Fanning, Esq.Cullen VpidyCykman LLPAttorne^For DefendantNATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000

SO ORDERED,

& LUXENBERG*P.C.WEDTE & LUXENBERG,

AttlpAneys for Plai10O^BroadwayNewark, NY 10003

Plaintiffs

(212 558-5500

min** Hon. Peter H. Moulton

1

-SJ


IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION


xNYCALI.A.S. Part £->(Moulton, ,£)

Index No. 190366/2011

NO OPPOSITION

JOHN A. ATTANASIO, DECD

JUN 17 mi

WHEREFORE, Defendant Imo Industries Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Imo Industries Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,

COUNTY Cl gi

NEW YORKsmbmc

£. SUMMARY JUDGMENTr|L pMgWION AND ORDER

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant Imo Industries Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withoutcosts.

Dated: New York, New YorkApriEM; 2016

2_V 2

IAlt700

1-& LUXENBERG, P.C.

ys for Plaintiffsladway

New W>rk, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

poh JCLJ David J. GoodeaiT, Esq.LEADER &^ERKON LLPAttorneys for Imo Industries Inc.630 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10017(212) 486-2400

SO ORDEREDHon. Peter H. Moulton

Dated:: Info / lbJ


In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

X


WESTON REED

F4-L~E~E> X

JUN 1 7 £016 ;COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE :

NEW YORK :.X

NYCALI. A. S. Pari 50(Moulton,$Index No,: 104333/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant PFIZER, INC. (“ PFIZER” ) requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs complaint against PFIZER, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it

is hereby


PFIZER, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated:New York, New YorkSeptember-— — 2015“

Nicholas Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

^ficolollpcncc, Esq. 1

Renzulli Law Firm, LLP300 East 42nd Street17th FloorNew York, New York 10017Counsel for Pfizer, Inc.

SO ORDERED.Hon. Peter H. Moulton


-XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: 117884/00

-XRONALD RESUA AND SUSAN RESUA,


E*| NOC

' L E W?

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTM§TION AND ORDER

A.C. & S, INC., et al„

?on. Peter H. MoultonX

WHEREFORE, Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company hereby requests Summary

Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company, with prejudice,



Defendant, A.W. Chesterton Company, be and tire same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party.


WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022

SO ORDERED,

^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton

m o 8 I


xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

xMARGARET C. LARSEN, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of STANLEY CORNELIUSLARSEN, deceased.


Index No,: 190087/12F * L E D

JUH 1 7 2016


A.W. CHESTERTON, et al.

Defendants.x

Haa, Sherry Klein I Kilter

WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,

BW/IP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.


l lup

M l3Jordan C. Fox, EsqfBELLUCK £ FOKf, 1Attorneys fon Plaittif546 Fifth Ava, 4/ Flok&/New York, NY*"!0036

John Mi/Guerriero, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER &MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022

SO ORDERED, blion. Sherry ICleiirHcitlar

HON.PETERH.MOULTON It ~!

f • ' W Cl: , / ' 3

I


XIn Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI. A, S. Part 50(Moulton,|?)


HENRY DAWSON NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Index No.: 113467/98

WHEREAS, Defendant PFIZER, INC. (“ PFIZER” ) requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs complaint against PFIZER, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it

is hereby


PFIZER, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkJL U1 IV, l VIIV

^September 2015 - J?

NMmlarNovack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor

co < vA^NfcSfe penee, Esq.Renzulli Law Firm, LLP300 East 42nd Street17th FloorNew York, New York 10017Counsel for Pfizer, Inc.

New York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

{00366628.DOCX}

1/


XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

INNOCENZO OSTACOLI;GREALD ATWOOD;RONALD ELLIOTT;ALONZO HAMILTON;ALLAN R. KACHUK;WLTER H. KEILICH;RICHARD T. KELLY;KENNETH KILGANNON;ROBERT KOJALO;AUGUSTINE P, MASSELLO;ROCCO MASTROCOLA;JAMES E. MCCANDLESS;JOHN MCGANN;KENNETH MEYEROWITZ;RICHARD WARDROP;

Plaintiffs,

NYCALI.A.S, Part 50(Moulton, pIndex No. 111621/2002


*-against-

A.C. &S., INC., formerly ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING andSUPPLY, INC.,etal.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant PFIZER INC, hereby requests summary judgment against plaintiff

AUGUSTINE MASSELLO in the above-entitled case, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant PFIZER INC. only with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant PFIZER

INC.only be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Traced p>pn \ n » ZQKQ

^AndreiGrous, Esq. * "''— Carol Tempesta,'Esq~“ V'WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER

Irew Grous, Esq,

Wall Street Plaza88 Pine StreetNew York, NY 10005Attorneys for PlaintiffAugustine Massello

larol Tempesta,Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLP81 Main Street, Suite 508White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantPfizer Inc.

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J,S,C.

C . ; 5

I


IN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-X

-X

NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Moulton, f.)

RUTH MORACE,as Administratrix for the Esfe of I g-*» IadexNo. 120765-1997RAYMOND MORACE, Individually, L» C U 105234-1998

111036-1998Plaintiff; JUN 1 7 2016 113279-2000

-against- COUNTY CLERK'S OF^f&fP OSITTON SUMMARYNEW YORK JUDGMENT MOTION AND

A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & ORDERSUPPLY),etal.

Defendants. -X

WHEREFORE,defendantPFIZER INC.hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against

defendant PFIZER INC.only with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant PFIZERTNC. onhf be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

cos ' litd

."OIAJIIH 7- U)r.|(,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Telephone: (212) 558-5580Facsimile: (212) 344-5461Attorneys for PlaintiffEstate of Raymond Morace

Nicole A.SpenceRENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLP81 Main Street, Suite 508White Plains,NY 10601Telephone: (914) 285-0700

' Facsimile: (914) 285-1213Attorneys for DefendantPfizer, Inc,

SOORD:EREDf__^Hrm THon.Peter H. MoultonhlS/ f b

r-

jJ

!

J

J


F l L B oIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


JOHN RICHARD SAWYER ANDMARGARET H. SAWYER

NYCAL ^ 1 1 £816I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No: 104204/99NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

UNT?cm$Niwfommes

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation,

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Dana Companies,

LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,


defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation, be and the same are


Dated: New York, New YorkS /23 & , 2016

JM' filAU^nasayM.Decicc^ Esq. Judith A. Ya>lqtz^sq.EITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. DARGER ERRANTE YA^

LiniWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

Judith A. Ya^itz^Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAtlTZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016 1(212) 452-5300

i

Hcfn. Peter H. MoultonilSL/Co I


IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION


MIREYA RIVADENEYRA, AS ADMINISTRATRIXFOR THE ESTATE OF MARIO RIVADEYRA, ANDMIREYA RIVADENEYRA, INDIVIDUALLY

F I L E DNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

m 17 mC°UNTY GLmmNIW vomOPPlG1

Index No: 190374/09


WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,


defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

Dated: New York, New York/ / / . 2016

LAAh>In M F°rnin *" 11nr] — »WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CTAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavifz^E^.

| DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLP('Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation

116 East 27th Street, 12th FlohrNew York, NY 10016 [(212) 452-5300 (

SO ORDERED,

1

^/flon. Peter H. Moulton

U~9JAOxt V J

F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JU(N||7 2g]gIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


CAROL J. RIEGER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASEXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM K.RIEGER


COUNTY CLiWiOWgiNIWYQBK

Index No: 113324/01


WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,


defendant Dana Companies, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkrtirujj 25 , 2016

mm'iLindsay Deciccd, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yd^it5/ Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

1 '

iSO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton 3 , ]




KATHLEEN P. KEOGH, Individually and as Executrix forthe Estate of JAMES W. KEOGH

Ju^ Um

Index No. 119892/98


WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment


plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice in this action,



defendant Lockheed Martin Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

DATED:

Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

,2016

\

Sam V. RuggeriAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED,

' Hon. Peter H. Moulton

NYS SUPREME CT<ML-1ST jD

JUN 13-2016



^ I L E DJ {JN 17 ?M


KATHLEEN P. KEOGH, Individually and as Executrix forthe Estate of JAMES W. KEOGH

Index No. 119892/98


WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: ,2016


Sam VTRuggeriAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747


NYS SUPREME C cfvn.-iSTJD

JUN 1 3-20(6

J&S&BSS?


!

GENE SPINELLI and JOAN SPINELLI,

Plaintiffs,

- against -A.L. EASTMOND & SONS, Individually and as

Successor to Easco Boiler Corp., et al.

Defendants.

New York City Asbestos Litigation

Index No.: 190488/2011


WHEREFORE, Defendant RJELLO CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. herebyrequests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to CPLR §3212, dismissingPlaintiffs Complaint against Defendant RIELLO CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

F 1 LJ U N t t *0'6

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-derendams all claims and cross-claims againstDefendant RIELLO CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. be and the same are herebydismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated; New York, New York

, 20

BELLUCK & FOX LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Attorneys \'<fx laintifT

Jordan F sq.

THE REINARTZ LAW FIRM, LLCCourt Plaza South- West Wing21 Main Street, Suite 205Hackensack, NJ 07601Attorneys for DefendantRiello Corporation of America, Inc.

By : ~LRichard A. R&na^CEsqJ

SO ORDERED,

Hon.Teter H. MoultonLS 08 2DI6


IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION JlJN 17 2016

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 121825/01

EARL W. VAN TASSELL and ROSE MARIE VANTASSELL








without costs.

DATED


SarfrV. RuggeriAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747





EARL W. VAN TASSELL and ROSE MARIE VANTASSELL

JlJH xj

Index No. 121825/01

jUH\1


§MCE fol^hferebyWHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE mb., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no

opposition thereto,



DATED: IMM ,2016


SaftrrV. RuggeriAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED,C Hon. Peter H. Moulton y /y / Co

rYssupR^w^lI JUN 1 fZgjg I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK F \ LE0

JUKII ®6



RONALD RESUA and SUSAN RESUAIndex No. 117884/00

110182/00








without costs.

DATE


SamV/^trggeriAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED,

NYS SUPREME CT-CIVIL-1ST JD

JUN 13 2016

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK F I L E DIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION



RONALD RESUA and SUSAN RESUAIndex No. 117884/00

110182/00





opposition thereto,



DATEI


Sam V. RuggeriAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED,

RECEIVEDNYS SUPREME CT-CIVIL-1ST JD

JUN 1ff*Q16HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE


MH 1 7 2016

NEW YORKTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

DANIEL P. POLAKIndex No. 104431/97

109676/99





opposition thereto,



DATED: ^ ,2016

Attorneys for Plaintiff Sam V. KuggeriWeitz & Luxenberg Attorneys for De700 Broadway - 7th floor BMCE Inc.

New York, NY 10003 Marshall, Denne

Sam V. KuggeriAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747



JUN 17 2016

COUNTY OJW8 OFFICENEW YORK


NIKI PETRONE as Proposed Executrix for the Estate ofROSE M. PETRONE








without costs.

DATED: tYhw) VS ,2016

Attorneys for plaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

SamVTRuggeriAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED,c Hon. Peter H. Moulton

NYS SUPREMEjPREMecr-avinsTJD

JUN 18? 2016



J U t s i l 7C0UNTycLmi

£Ql§

Gg


NIKI PETRONE as Proposed Executrix for the Estate ofROSE M. PETRONE

Index No. 118275/02





opposition thereto,



DATED: 2-3 ,2016

YS4MJ.Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,

Sam V. RuggeriAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

W/y IkHon. Peter H. Moulton

NYS SUPREMEECCTVaviL-isT JD

HOIAl

JUN 13' 2016


F I L E DJUN 1 7 2016

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK


CATHLEEN MARIE HEWITT BIGGS, AS EXECUTRIXFOR THE ESTATE OF JAMES C. HEWITT



in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissingplaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice in this action,




without costs.

DATED:


Sam \7TRuggeriAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED,




Jw 1 7 mCENEW YORK


CATHLEEN MARIE HEWITT BIGGS, AS EXECUTRIXFOR THE ESTATE OF JAMES C. HEWITT


WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in theabove entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’


opposition thereto,



DATE ,2016


Cam V. RuggeriAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED,

^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton






BARBARA A. PINE, and LISA J. POIRER, as Co-Executrices for the Estates of HAGOP KEVORKHAGOPIAN, and ALICE C. HAGOPIAN

F I L E DJlJN 17 2016

COUNTY CLERK'S OPf?jegNEW YORK

Index No. 122168/98



above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no

opposition thereto,



DATED: ftf /lb ,2016


Sam Vfc faggeriAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747


RECEIVEDNYS SUPREME CT-CIVIL-1STJD

JUN 132016HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK F I L E DIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION JUN 17 2016

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

CONNIE CIFFA, as Executrix for the Estate of JOSEPHPAUL CIFFA, and CONNIE CIFFA, Individually

Index No. 109694/02105876/02


WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc. , hereby requests summary judgment in the



opposition thereto,



DA


Saro^VTRuggeriAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK P \ L£°IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION


CONNIE CIFFA, as Executrix for the Estate of JOSEPHPAUL CIFFA, and CONNIE CIFFA, Individually

Index No. 109694/02105876/02



in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissingplaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice in this action,




without costs.

DATED:

SarrfOT RuggeriAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747



Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2019-07-17 · Following this...

Documents

Transcript of Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2019-07-17 · Following this...