Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 2/1/2019 · Charles Ferguson, Esq\ \...
Transcript of Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 2/1/2019 · Charles Ferguson, Esq\ \...
-
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
-
::zi
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK FEB 01 2019
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN FE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONI.A.S. Part 46(Billings, L.)
This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 01-111225
PHI.IP KENNEDY AND MARION KENNEDY, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERagainst
A.C. AND S„INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY),
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissedwith prejudice and without costs.
New York, New YorkDATED:
SHAZIA CHAUD$RI DEWIT, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Koh er Co.48 V fall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
ADAM DRCKStCR, ESWEITZ & LUXENBERG ^Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),PHILIP KENNEDY AND MARION KENNEDY,Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
M.rJ
\VHOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
SO ORDERED:Honorable Manuel J. Mendez
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
HE©El!¥ 7=>/ bnSUPR EME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK FEB 01 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONI.A.S. Part 46(Billings, L.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 01-111222
JOSEPH J. MAIELLO NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERagainst
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY),
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissedwith prejudice and without costs.
/0 /% /(&DATED:New York, New York
"SHAZIA CH^DHRI DEWIT, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
ADAM DRCKSLER, ESQ.Ckar(^ %WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiffs),JOSEPH J. MAIELLO,700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
3
* * Honorable Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN,DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
SO ORDERED:
alfE948 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York,NY
-
p) cr (r jc:Ji ! \ '\ / / | c
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK FEB 01 2019
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN F E: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONI.A.S. Part 46(Billings, L.)
This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 01-111226
JOSEPH J. KENNINGTON AND MARYKENNINGTON,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
against
A.C.&S., INC., (ARMSTRONGsJTRACTING & SUPPLY), ET AL.,CO
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross claims against defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
'0/3// ?New York, New YorkDATED:
HfiZ\A CHAUCMHRI DEWIT, ESQ. ADAM DRCKOLCR, ESQ. CU^U s H.WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiffs),JOSEPH J. KENNINGTON AND MARYKENNINGTON,700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
HOAGLAND,DUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Koh er Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
NGO, MORAN -f-Xrcj usc>n
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law SO ORDERED:
Honorable Manuel J. Mendez48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
-
SUPREME|COUNTY Q
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKfF NEW YORK
X
JAN 3 1 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILThis Document Relates To:
ROBERT O’NEILL AND LORRAINE O’NEILL, NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moultorr)
Index No.: 112732-2000
Plaintiff(s),
-against-NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A.C. AND S„INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRAC|TING & SUPPLY)., et al,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitledcase, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaintagainst defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstR!>Odefendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
I /NMDated:New York, New York
Kimcii Alfuid ICneis, Ei>q.~ ' L—K S f L GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
sqT̂ u^Kv\~t*> r •k_Susan -BWEITZ & JLUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys j'or Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 585-5500
^/ /SO ORDE D, Hon. Peter II. Moulton\KOdlri>MANUEL J. MENDEZ
j.s.c.
-
SUPREME doURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez,J.)
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION JAN 2 9 2019
X PART 13Index No.: 1 0 5 7 «*E l C0U R T - CIVILThis Docunjient Relates To:
ALVIN L. B|SCOMB and FRANCES BASCOMB,Plaintiffs,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER-ag3inst-
A.C. and Sv INC. andFOSTER WHEELER LLC, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE,Defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC requests summary judgment in the above-
entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the Complaint and
cross-claims against FOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against Defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC are
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.New York,New York
i / oDated:
V•s
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 190437/2009
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates to:
ALDEN L.i PETERSON JR and NORMAJEAN PETERSON,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,vs.
ANCHOR PACKING CO. INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
L L U , 2019\
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
F I L E DFEB 0 1 2019
COUNTYNEW YORK CB
S O ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.s.c.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY O!? NEW YORK
JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 113102/1998
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Docunient Relates to:
CHRISTIAN MERRILL, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,vs.
AC&S INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: NeLv York, New York1 ; / A , 2019
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadvjayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
^ I L E DSO ORDERED, FEB 01AlfiWVO^K0pF>CE
2019Hon. Manuel J. MendezCOUNTYMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 190085/2009
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION I
PART 131 NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates to:
PATRICK LEIGHTON, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,vs.
ANCHOR PACKING CO. INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being np opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkI / , (C , 2019
Charles Ferguson, EsqNsJWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys f4>r Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
F I L E DSO ORDERED, FEB 0 1 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .s.c.
-
D.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAM 2 9
PART ^NYS SUPREM^^NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 112154/2002
- CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOSEPHINE JONES, as administratrix forthe estate of WILLIE J. JONES, andJOSEPHINE JONES, Individually,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,vs.
AC&S INC. ., ET AL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
1 , /
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 190131/2010
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASjBESTOS LITIGATION
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates to:
MILDRED HINSCH, as Executrix for theEstate of KENNETH R. HINSCH SR, andMILDRED HINSCH, Individually,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being do opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York( . 1 C , 2019 o
%r'N -Charles Ferguson, Esq.^— 1Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.c.
-
D.
JAN 2 9 2019SUPREME CCOUNTY OF
3URT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKNEW YORK PART 13
SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYSNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 115276/2000
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:JOHN Q. ZERO and MARY ZERO,Plaintiff,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
vs.
A.C. and S„INC., ET AL.,Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. without prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
I , (l , 2019
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorney for1 Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
Manuel J. MSO ORDERED,
Hon. endezMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 190073/2009
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYS
This Documeht Relates to:
SONDRA SlfTTKIN, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of STANLEYSUTKIN, and SONDRA SUTKIN,Individually,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,vs.
A.O. SMITE WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York( , [ C , 2019
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & LuAttorneys fo700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
xenberg, P.C.Plaintiff
F I L E D/— Xauel J. Mi FEB 01 2019SO ORDERED, Hon. Manuel J 'endez
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 102118/2007
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates to:
BILLIE J. ROWLING, as Executrix for theEstate of RAYMOND R. ROWLING, andBILLIE J. ROWLING, Individually,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
J } ,, 2019\
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Lti xenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, ^Y 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-00Phone: (212) 309-6000
ff \c£SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.
-
SUPREME (pOURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK E©EB¥ED
JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 115634/2001
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
PART 13NVS SUPREME COURT - C.il/R
This Document Relates to:JOHN D. SORENSEN, as Executor for theEstate JOHN A. SORENSEN, and CARMELASORENSEN, Individually,Plaintiff,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
vs.A.C. and S.l INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. without prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed!without prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
/ & , 2019N \ *
Cftarles Ferguson, EsqN*Weitz & Lutenberg, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
SO ORDERED,f 0 1 2019Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
K'S0FF'c6MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
JAN 2 9 2019SUPREME CCfURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYCAL
I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 126736/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:MARY RAISH, as Executrix for the Estate ofTHOMAS M|RAISH, and MARY RAISH,Individually,Plaintiff,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
vs.A.C. and S., ike., ET AL„
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. without prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
hlk ,2019Charles Ferguson, Esq. xWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000F I L E D
SO ORDERED,f EB 01 2019Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
IK'S OPF1ceMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. C0UN^W
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 190246/2010
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYAS BESTOS LITIGATION PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Docuihent Relates to:
CAROLENE GUMAER, as Executrix for theEstate of LARRY V. GUMAER, andCAROLENE GUMAER, Individually,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Ul , 2019—Charles Ferguson, Esq.-Weitz & Lnxenberg, P.C.Attorneys fi r Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000 Fiueo
f£B » 1 W'9SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez Off \C£
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
RSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13 I(Mendez)
Index No: 101424/2007
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION NYS SUPREMERCOU3RT - CIVIL
This Document Relates to:FLORENCE^ CATTERSON, Individually andas Executrix for the Estate of JOHN L.CATTERSON,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
1 , K . 2019
t*— Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060 ^ nPhone: (212) 309-600C|1 E U
^n ânesTvrlWeitz & Liixenberg, P^0fAttorneys fo r Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, FEB 0 1 2°^o°̂ *FHCE
Hon. Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 M
PART 13NY? SUPREME COURTNYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez)Index No: 125539/2000
- CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Docume|nt Relates to:IDA FLYNN, Individually and as Executrix forthe Estate of MARTIN E. FLYNN,Plaintiff,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
vs.A.C. and S., INC.., ET AL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. without prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto.
ORDEjRED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Newl York, New York
L-LA . 2019
Charles Fergjuson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
IWC^\SO ORDERED, Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
SUPREME QOURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 100750/2003
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:JOSEPH A. BARLETTE, JR.,Plaintiff,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
vs.CONGOLEUM CORP., ET AL„
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiff s complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. without prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
\( /& , 2019c
Charles Ferguson, Esq>-Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000 toSO ORDERED,
Hon. Manuel J. MendezFEB0
COUNTYCLERK'SO
NEWYORK^\CfcMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
D
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 190252/2010
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates to:
DENNIS W. ABSHER, as Executor for theEstate of CECIL W. ABSHER,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,vs.
. SMITljl WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETA.OAL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejujiice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
l I t , 2019
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Lu xenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
BE®SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
'T.rJ
JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 190497/2011
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
RART 13NVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates to:
AURELIO TORRES, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,vs.
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL.,
Defendants.
WHEFETORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled] case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is
RED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goiilds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
ORD
Dated: New York, New York
I , U , 2019\
_Charles Ferguson, EsqcOWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
SO ORDERED,
^ &Hon. Manuel J. Mendez G°MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 190089/2011
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
LUIGI GAMUTANO and CESIRAGARMTANO,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL.,
Defendants.
WHEILEFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkl f /C . 2019
Charles Ferguson, Esq\.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK D.
j/\N 2 9NYCALI.A.S. Part 13 \(Mendez) \Index No: 190309/201
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13couRT - CIVIL
NyS SUPREThis Document Relates to:
ENEA CARTELLI, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,vs.
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDEjRED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New; York, New York'J / 4 , 2019
. . . V J /5\
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.c.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 190327/2011
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates to:
WAFIK RASSMY TAWFIK and MONATAWFIK,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,vs.
A.O. SMITE WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL.,
Defendants.
WHEFEFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
l f U , 2019c\ ^
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys fo::Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0Q6Phone: (212) 309-600*SO ORDERED,
Hon. Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)
Index No: 190379/2044
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBpSTOS LITIGATION
JAN 2 9 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILThis Document Relates to:
DORSEY E. MORGAN and SHERRYMORGAN,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,vs.
BORG-WARNER CORP., ET AL.,
Defendants.
WHEFLEFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint aga|nst defendant Goulds Pumps Incthere being nq opposition thereto, it is
. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, and
ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goilds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed
ice and without costs.without prejud
Dated: New York, New Yorkl ( U , 2019
-
D.CT.
SUPREME COMRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF IfJEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 190310/2011
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
RICHARD K(LIS and RUTH KLIS,Plaintiffs,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
vs.A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
| / , /4 , 2 0 1 9
Charles Ferguson,Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ S C.
-
In Re: First Judicial DistrictAsbestos Litigation JAN 2 9 2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY pF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVIL
THEODORE MAJKA,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Plaintiff Index No.: 190054/2009vs.
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, et al,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against GENUINE PARTS COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice toall co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORJDANY
ERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant GENUINE PARTSare dismissed with prejudice and without costs.COMP
Dated: N< ork, New York" ", 201^
Dated: Buffalo, New York.2018iBELLO LLP BARCLAY DAMON LLP
Jordan Fox, Ei a.Attorneys farMaintiff546 Fifth Ayenue, Fourth FloorNew YcAd^ New York 10036Telephone:(212) 681-1574
Peter S. Marlette, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantGenuine Parts CompanyHie Avant Building, Suite 1200200 Delaware AvenueBuffalo, New York 14202Telephone: (716) 856-5500
SO ORDERED:
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
17341853.1
-
„v.;.\ .V
First Judicial DistrictAsbestos Litigation
' SOV. jfISIn Re: • uJAN 2 9 2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13NYS SUPREME ("OIJRT - CIVIL
HUBERT LEE KING, JR., as Personal Representativeof the Estate of HUBERT LEE KING, SR.and MIRIAM KING, Individually,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERIndex No.: 2004-112168Plaintiffs,
vs.
PARTS COMPANY, et al,GENUINE
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint add cross-claims against GENUINE PARTS COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice toall co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant GENUINE PARTSCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New^foi .York Dated: Buffalo, New York&X . . 2018f 301BELLUCK & BARCLAY DAMON LLPJordan Foxj Esq.Attorneys for Pi546 Fifth Avenud, FiNew York, New Yojk 10036Telephone: (212) 681-1574
Peter S. Marlette, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantGenuine Parts CompanyThe Avant Building, Suite 1200200 Delaware AvenueBuffalo, New Yotk 14202Telephone: (716) 856-5500
F \ ^
ti\Floor
SO ORDERED:
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C, fee o l
c0UNTleifvôS OFFICE17341721,1
-
JAN 2 9 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILXNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
MEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE:
XIndex No.: 125486/2000
Relates to:This DocumenUNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
EDWARD LEWIS,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New YorlL New York
/
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
/ HP°IJJMBy:By:Lawrence G. Lee, Esa
-
D, e
JAN 2 9 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILXNEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
IN RE:
XIndex No.: 125486/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
EDWARD LEWIS,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Compiiny are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
VJLm By:By:4bln Dearie, Lawrence G. Lee, Es
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022
515 MadisonNew York, h(347) 492-1152
f \ V.£°« t roflSO ORDEREy.Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
Qf f\C t
-
JAN 2 9SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13MYS 5UP^we COURT - CIVILXIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
XIndex No.: 125484/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
KEVIN J. HUNT,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys fo( Plaintiff
Lawrence G. Lee, EBy:By:
Dearie, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152
f \ V-SO ORDERED:
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019x
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURTNYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, M.)
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE: - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 125484/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
KEVIN J. HUNT,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
LlMllLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
'LBy;By: Lawrence G. Lee, Esq'fohn Dearie, Esq.137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 MadisonNew York, IN(347) 492-1152
Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022
F I L E D/~ASO ORDERED: FEB 0 1 2019COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J .S .C.
-
SUPREME CQURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019
X PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
XIndex No.: 125488/2000
This Document! Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WALLY GRANT,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants ihere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York,,New York
imu?THE DEARli LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
.awrence G. Lee,By:By:
John Dearie, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 MadisonNew York, N(347) 492-1152
Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022
f \ V-SO ORDEREj}: r'BceHon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019x
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 124585/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
GEORGE FILIPPONI,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New h oik, New York
lLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:By:Lawrence G. Lee, E^
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
C7Jolin Dearie, Esq.
Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022
515 MadisonNew York, IS(347) 492-1152
\\&>0 \ W'9SO ORDERED: Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C,
Qff \C£
-
D
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019
XPART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
XIndex No.: 125488/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WALLY GRANT,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:By:Lawrence G. Lee, Esq*John Dearie, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152
ft VSO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
COUNTYCLERK-
NEWYORKMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XJAN 2 9 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 124585/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
GEORGE FIL1PPONI,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New YorkpNew York
i£mULLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:By:Lawrence G. Lg^Esq.John Dearie, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, Nsw York 10022(347) 492-1152
SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
SUPREME Co|uRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF IpEW YORK
EW YORK CITYjkSBESTOS LITIGATION
JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 104690/2005
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
FELIPPO GRACI,
X
RjEFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in tlje above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
I
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York,/ New York
WHE
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany / )
By:By:ohn Dearie, Esq. Lawrence G. Le
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, hew York 10022(347) 492-1152
so?f'ceSO ORDERED:CO
-
D
SUPREME C OURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019
XPART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
IN RE:
XIndex No.: 104684/2005
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
ALBERT FR\SER,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitlec. action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed witi prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
£By:By: LLawrence G. Lee, Es,
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152
SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.s.c.
-
D)ffJ l i l3SUPREME CDURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9*XrAK
't i JsypREK'-i COURT^1NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, M.)
IN RE: - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 104684/2005
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
ALBERT FRASER,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yqrk, New York
LLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
Lawrence G. Lee, Esq?By:By:
John Dearie, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152 to
SO ORDERE D:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X JAN 2 9 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 111580/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
ARTHUR ERLAND,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Y k, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:By:Lawrence G. L&6, Esq.John Dearie, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 MadisonNew York, N(347) 492-1152
Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022
SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
S0 °̂eMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.c.
-
D. C-SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF N EW YORK JAN 2 9 2019xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 111580/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
ARTHUR ERLAND,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
D that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Compahy are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yofk, New York
ORDE
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany r p
AAAJ AJ-̂By:By:John Dearie, Esq. Lawrence G. Lee, Es;
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152
/^\SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
soff'ofc0
-
cD, Z3L_SUPREME C OURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019x
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURTIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
- CIVIL.
XIndex No.: 116827/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
ROY EATON
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Y
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
1 PART 13! NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 116827/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
ROY EATON
X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
U2LTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys foij Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany
By: By:Lawrence G. Lee, Efsq.ohn
515 MadisonNew York, N(212) 980-0404
Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
* \ I*®SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF IS EW YORK
X JAN 2 9 2019NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
IN RE:PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 116827/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
RAYMOND DOZIER,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorkfMUllTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
By: By:Lawrence G. Lee^Esq.
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
F I L E DSO ORDERED:FEB 0 * 20'9Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
OFF'06MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
D) [EJSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019X
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
IN RE: PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 116827/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
RAYMOND DOZIER,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, Ne,w York
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany
2By: By: 7llJUÛ s' , jLawrence G. Lee, E^.
y
John Dearie, Esq.
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, Eew York 10022(212) 980-0434
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
« \SO ORDERE Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.c.
-
D.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019
x PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYCAL
I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE:
XIndex No.: 104691/2005
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
JAMES DOWLING,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Y|ork, New York
I aq'ltaTHE DEARI E LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
%By:By: J-John Dearie, Esq. Lawrence G. Lee, Esq.515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400 to
SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
SUPREME C3URT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X JAN 2 9 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 104691/2005
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
JAMES DOWLING,
X
WHEFEFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
RED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
ORDE
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany / )1
By: By:Z17 Lawrence G. Lee, fisq.ohn Deane, Esq.
515 MadisonNew York, N(347) 492-11:52
Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
F I L E DSO ORDERED: o 1Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.COUNTY CLERKS
O
NEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
-
D.SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 20^9x
PART 13NYS SUPR£M£ COURT
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
- CIVIL
XIndex No.: 116819/2000
This Documew; Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
GEORGE E. DIXON,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, NewiYork
i m mTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
r'*'
/
By:By:Lawrence G. Lee, 6sq.
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, Lew York 10022(212) 980-0404
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
F I L E DSO ORDERED:FEB 0 * 2019
couN1Teif?o^Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
S QpF\C6MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J .S .C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 116819/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
GEORGE E. D XON,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDEEED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yo rk, New York
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany
% By:By:John Dearie, Esq. Lawrence G. Lee, Esq.
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(212) 980-04C 4
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
/''XSO ORDEREE9 \ TO'9Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JAN 2 9 2019xNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 102391/2002
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
PATRICK DALY,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
THE DEARIIf LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:By:John Dearie, Lawrence G. Lee, E&tp
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152
F \ V-£°SO ORDEREp: 01fEBHon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 102391/2002
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
PATRICK DA LY,
X
EFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
WHEF
l
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany ^
By: By:John Dearie, Esq. Lawrence G. Lee^Esq.
515 MadisonNew York, fs(347) 492-1152
Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
SO ORDERED:1WHon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.c«
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019X
IS EW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
IN RE: PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 104668/2005
This Document Relates to: UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
LUIGI CRISCI,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants tiere is no opposition, it is
ORDEFJED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yorl/, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
THE DEARIIji LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
TABy:By:Lawrence G. Lee, Esq.Johh Dearie, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-llj52
F I L E DSO ORDERED: Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
01 2019
COUNTYCLERK'S
NEWYORK
fffl
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JAN 2 9 2019xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 104668/2005
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
LUIGI CRISCl,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yorli:, New York
lTHE DEARB LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany
;ûBy:By:John Dearie, Esq. Lawrence G.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022
515 MadisonNew York, N(347) 492-1152
F I L E DSO ORDERED: FEB 0 1 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
SUPREME CpURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 116826/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
JOSEPH BUONOCORE,
X
WHEFLEFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
LiUMTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys foij Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
By:By: jLawrence G. Lee,Jo earie, bsq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 MadisonNew York, N(212) 980-0404
Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022
FILED/-A FEB0
COUNTYCLERiw,
NEWYORK
SO ORDERED:
1*8?***Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S .C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X JAN 2 9 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 116826/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
JOSEPH BUQNOCORE,
X
WHEFLEFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
v York, New YorkDated: New
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys fori Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany ^By:By:
Lawrence G. Lee,Esqohn Deari
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 MadisonNew York, N(212) 980-0404
Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022
F I L E D' *A/— \ « \ IWSO ORDERED: Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J .S .C.
-
LnSUPREME CO LJRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 116822/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
REGINALD BOUCHER,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDEFLED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yofk, New York
/ tTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
muBy: By:(Lhn Dearie, Esq. Lawrence G. Lee, Esq.
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
/-ASO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.s.c.
G
-
D.SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 116822/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
REGINALD B OUCHER,
X
WHERjEFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yoijk, New YorkiMMTHE DEARI E LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys foil Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany )
By:By:Join Dearie, Esq. Lawrence G. Lee, E&q.
515 MadisonNew York, h(212) 980-0404
Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
eof"-SO ORDERE1 D: \V1«Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.ff'O6
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JAN 2 9 2019xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 104669/2005
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
VICTOR BINGHI,
X
WHEFEFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New 'York, New York
/THE DEARIjE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
By:By:Lawrence G. Led;John Dearie, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022
515 MadisonNew York, N(347) 492-1152 eoFILSO ORDERED:
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
COUNTYCimKS0
NEWYORKMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
P. cfSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 104669/2005
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
VICTOR BINGHI,
X
WHEILEFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
. ^ork, New YorkiMMiS.Dated: NewTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany
Id By:Lawrence G. Lee/Esq.
ABy:Jolin Dearie, Esq.
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
p \ v.fc°SO ORDERED: o110«fEBHon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.Off'06MANUELJ MENDEZ
J.s.c.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XJAN 2 9 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 113863/2005UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
ANTHONY DE ROSA,
X
WEEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, improperly sued as TheRockbestos Company requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant toCivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claimsagainst RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, improperly sued as The Rockbestos Company with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & Cable
LLC, improperly sued as The Rockbestos Company are dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.Dated: New Ydrk, New York
/LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC,improperly sued as Th^Tlockbestos Company
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:By:Andrew J. MundoJohn 0earie
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Ave, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980- 0404
F \ \- H °FEB 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK'St
NEW YORKSO ORDERED:
S QFBC£Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL PART 13I.A.S. Part il TITS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL(Mendez, M.)
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 116925/03
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
EDWARD JOHNSON
X
WFEREFORE, defendant Darcoid Company (“ Darcoid” ), incorrectly sued asDarcoid Co. of California d/b/a Darcoid Rubber Co., requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingthe complaint and cross-claims against Darcoid with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Darcoid aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
AITHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Darcoid Company
By: (HhkAjA.AA.By:Lawrence G. Lee
e®515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980- 0555
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
\iwfpe»
SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C.
-
D.SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JAN 2 9 2019XNEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
IN RE: PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X
Index No.: 105495/05This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
BERNARD SMAHL
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Darcoid Company (“ Darcoid” ), requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Darcoid with prejudice, iind afternotice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Darcoid aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
3ALLLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys forJDarcoid Company
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
i
By:John Dearie Lawrence G. Li
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0555
/ SSO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
D,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019
x PART 13|\T'S SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYCAL
I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE:
X
Index No.: 116400/2004This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
ROSARIO CORABI
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Darcoid Company (“ Darcoid” ), incorrectly sued asDarcoid Co. of California d/b/a Darcoid Rubber Co., requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingthe complaint and cross-claims against Darcoid with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Darcoid aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Vork.New York
/
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Darcoid Company
/
By:By:Lawrence G. Le
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0555
SO ORDERED:SHon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019X
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE: NYCALI.A.S. Part 13 'COuK’ ^(Mendez, M.)
- »-«!
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 112894/05UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
RALPH TREPICCIONE
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Darcoid Company (“ Darcoid” ), requests nummaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Darcoid with prejudice, and afternotice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Darcoid aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, York
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Darcoid Company
By:By:ohirDearie Lawrence G. L
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0555
SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. cocker
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019
x PART 13N> S SUPREME COURT - CIVILNEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONIN RE: NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 113926/05UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
MICHAEL TANNIAN
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Darcoid Company (“ Darcoid” ), requests nummaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Darcoid with prejudice, and afternotice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Darcoid aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York,,New York
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Darcoid Company
Wt g^By:By: John Dearie Lawrence G. Le515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0555
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C .
-
D, C,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019
x PART 13(JPREME COURT - CIVILNYCAL
I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE: NYS S!
XIndex No.: 125990/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGME NTMOTION AND ORDER
MARY SAUER, as Executrix for the Estate ofEDWARD J. SAUER,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
/ lLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
lIBy:By: JUUJUALawrence G. Lee, EsafJohn Dearie, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152
F' 6?SO ORDERED: Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
-
D.SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019
X j PART 13NY|S SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYCAL
I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE:
XIndex No.: 125990/2000
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
MARY SAUER, as Executrix for the Estate ofEDWARD J. SAUER,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany/-
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
3LBy:By:Lawrence G. Lee,ohn Dearie, Esq. ;q.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152 to
A WSO ORDERED:
0̂ '°Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIndex No.: 104659/2005
This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDE R
KALJO LAIDLA,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
IpmTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
By: By:ohn Deane, Esq. Lawrence G. Lee, Esq.
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
tPFILSO ORDERED: IWHon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
-
eD. eSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBEST