Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 2/1/2019  · Charles Ferguson, Esq\ \...

111
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.

Transcript of Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 2/1/2019  · Charles Ferguson, Esq\ \...

  • Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

    To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

    1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

    2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

    In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

    Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

  • ::zi

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK FEB 01 2019

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN FE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONI.A.S. Part 46(Billings, L.)

    This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 01-111225

    PHI.IP KENNEDY AND MARION KENNEDY, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERagainst

    A.C. AND S„INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY),

    WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,

    ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all

    claims and cross claims against defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissedwith prejudice and without costs.

    New York, New YorkDATED:

    SHAZIA CHAUD$RI DEWIT, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Koh er Co.48 V fall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

    ADAM DRCKStCR, ESWEITZ & LUXENBERG ^Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),PHILIP KENNEDY AND MARION KENNEDY,Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

    M.rJ

    \VHOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

    SO ORDERED:Honorable Manuel J. Mendez

    48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • HE©El!¥ 7=>/ bnSUPR EME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK FEB 01 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONI.A.S. Part 46(Billings, L.)

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 01-111222

    JOSEPH J. MAIELLO NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERagainst

    A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY),

    WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

    plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition

    thereto,

    ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all

    claims and cross claims against defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissedwith prejudice and without costs.

    /0 /% /(&DATED:New York, New York

    "SHAZIA CH^DHRI DEWIT, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

    ADAM DRCKSLER, ESQ.Ckar(^ %WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiffs),JOSEPH J. MAIELLO,700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

    3

    * * Honorable Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J.S.C.

    HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN,DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

    SO ORDERED:

    alfE948 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York,NY

  • p) cr (r jc:Ji ! \ '\ / / | c

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK FEB 01 2019

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN F E: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONI.A.S. Part 46(Billings, L.)

    This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 01-111226

    JOSEPH J. KENNINGTON AND MARYKENNINGTON,

    NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    against

    A.C.&S., INC., (ARMSTRONGsJTRACTING & SUPPLY), ET AL.,CO

    WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

    above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

    plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition

    thereto,

    ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross claims against defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed

    with prejudice and without costs.

    '0/3// ?New York, New YorkDATED:

    HfiZ\A CHAUCMHRI DEWIT, ESQ. ADAM DRCKOLCR, ESQ. CU^U s H.WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiffs),JOSEPH J. KENNINGTON AND MARYKENNINGTON,700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

    HOAGLAND,DUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Koh er Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

    NGO, MORAN -f-Xrcj usc>n

    HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law SO ORDERED:

    Honorable Manuel J. Mendez48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY MANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J.S.C.

  • SUPREME|COUNTY Q

    COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKfF NEW YORK

    X

    JAN 3 1 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILThis Document Relates To:

    ROBERT O’NEILL AND LORRAINE O’NEILL, NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moultorr)

    Index No.: 112732-2000

    Plaintiff(s),

    -against-NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

    A.C. AND S„INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRAC|TING & SUPPLY)., et al,

    Defendants.x

    WHEREFORE, CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitledcase, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaintagainst defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    ERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstR!>Odefendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    I /NMDated:New York, New York

    Kimcii Alfuid ICneis, Ei>q.~ ' L—K S f L GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

    sqT̂ u^Kv\~t*> r •k_Susan -BWEITZ & JLUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys j'or Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 585-5500

    ^/ /SO ORDE D, Hon. Peter II. Moulton\KOdlri>MANUEL J. MENDEZ

    j.s.c.

  • SUPREME doURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    xNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez,J.)

    IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION JAN 2 9 2019

    X PART 13Index No.: 1 0 5 7 «*E l C0U R T - CIVILThis Docunjient Relates To:

    ALVIN L. B|SCOMB and FRANCES BASCOMB,Plaintiffs,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER-ag3inst-

    A.C. and Sv INC. andFOSTER WHEELER LLC, et al.,

    Defendants.x

    WHEREFORE,Defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC requests summary judgment in the above-

    entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the Complaint and

    cross-claims against FOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

    there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against Defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC are

    dismissed with prejudice and without costs.New York,New York

    i / oDated:

    V•s

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 190437/2009

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    This Document Relates to:

    ALDEN L.i PETERSON JR and NORMAJEAN PETERSON,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    Plaintiffs,vs.

    ANCHOR PACKING CO. INC., ET AL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is

    ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    L L U , 2019\

    Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

    F I L E DFEB 0 1 2019

    COUNTYNEW YORK CB

    S O ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.s.c.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY O!? NEW YORK

    JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 113102/1998

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    This Docunient Relates to:

    CHRISTIAN MERRILL, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    Plaintiff,vs.

    AC&S INC., ET AL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is

    ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: NeLv York, New York1 ; / A , 2019

    Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadvjayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

    ^ I L E DSO ORDERED, FEB 01AlfiWVO^K0pF>CE

    2019Hon. Manuel J. MendezCOUNTYMANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 190085/2009

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION I

    PART 131 NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    This Document Relates to:

    PATRICK LEIGHTON, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    Plaintiff,vs.

    ANCHOR PACKING CO. INC., ET AL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being np opposition thereto, it is

    ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New YorkI / , (C , 2019

    Charles Ferguson, EsqNsJWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys f4>r Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

    F I L E DSO ORDERED, FEB 0 1 2019

    COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

    Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .s.c.

  • D.

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAM 2 9

    PART ^NYS SUPREM^^NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 112154/2002

    - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Document Relates to:

    JOSEPHINE JONES, as administratrix forthe estate of WILLIE J. JONES, andJOSEPHINE JONES, Individually,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    Plaintiff,vs.

    AC&S INC. ., ET AL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is

    ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    1 , /

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 190131/2010

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASjBESTOS LITIGATION

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    This Document Relates to:

    MILDRED HINSCH, as Executrix for theEstate of KENNETH R. HINSCH SR, andMILDRED HINSCH, Individually,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    Plaintiff,vs.

    A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being do opposition thereto, it is

    ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York( . 1 C , 2019 o

    %r'N -Charles Ferguson, Esq.^— 1Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

    SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.c.

  • D.

    JAN 2 9 2019SUPREME CCOUNTY OF

    3URT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKNEW YORK PART 13

    SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYSNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 115276/2000

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Document Relates to:JOHN Q. ZERO and MARY ZERO,Plaintiff,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    vs.

    A.C. and S„INC., ET AL.,Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. without prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto.

    ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    I , (l , 2019

    Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorney for1 Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

    Manuel J. MSO ORDERED,

    Hon. endezMANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 190073/2009

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYS

    This Documeht Relates to:

    SONDRA SlfTTKIN, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of STANLEYSUTKIN, and SONDRA SUTKIN,Individually,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    Plaintiff,vs.

    A.O. SMITE WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is

    ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York( , [ C , 2019

    Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & LuAttorneys fo700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

    xenberg, P.C.Plaintiff

    F I L E D/— Xauel J. Mi FEB 01 2019SO ORDERED, Hon. Manuel J 'endez

    COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 102118/2007

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    This Document Relates to:

    BILLIE J. ROWLING, as Executrix for theEstate of RAYMOND R. ROWLING, andBILLIE J. ROWLING, Individually,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    Plaintiff,vs.

    A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is

    ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    J } ,, 2019\

    Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Lti xenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, ^Y 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-00Phone: (212) 309-6000

    ff \c£SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.

  • SUPREME (pOURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK E©EB¥ED

    JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 115634/2001

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    PART 13NVS SUPREME COURT - C.il/R

    This Document Relates to:JOHN D. SORENSEN, as Executor for theEstate JOHN A. SORENSEN, and CARMELASORENSEN, Individually,Plaintiff,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    vs.A.C. and S.l INC., ET AL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. without prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto.

    ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed!without prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    / & , 2019N \ *

    Cftarles Ferguson, EsqN*Weitz & Lutenberg, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

    SO ORDERED,f 0 1 2019Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

    K'S0FF'c6MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • JAN 2 9 2019SUPREME CCfURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYCAL

    I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)

    Index No: 126736/2002

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Document Relates to:MARY RAISH, as Executrix for the Estate ofTHOMAS M|RAISH, and MARY RAISH,Individually,Plaintiff,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    vs.A.C. and S., ike., ET AL„

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. without prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto.

    ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    hlk ,2019Charles Ferguson, Esq. xWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000F I L E D

    SO ORDERED,f EB 01 2019Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

    IK'S OPF1ceMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. C0UN^W

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)

    Index No: 190246/2010

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYAS BESTOS LITIGATION PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    This Docuihent Relates to:

    CAROLENE GUMAER, as Executrix for theEstate of LARRY V. GUMAER, andCAROLENE GUMAER, Individually,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    Plaintiff,vs.

    A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is

    ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    Ul , 2019—Charles Ferguson, Esq.-Weitz & Lnxenberg, P.C.Attorneys fi r Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000 Fiueo

    f£B » 1 W'9SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez Off \C£

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • RSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13 I(Mendez)

    Index No: 101424/2007

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION NYS SUPREMERCOU3RT - CIVIL

    This Document Relates to:FLORENCE^ CATTERSON, Individually andas Executrix for the Estate of JOHN L.CATTERSON,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    Plaintiff,vs.

    A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is

    ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    1 , K . 2019

    t*— Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060 ^ nPhone: (212) 309-600C|1 E U

    ^n ânesTvrlWeitz & Liixenberg, P^0fAttorneys fo r Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    SO ORDERED, FEB 0 1 2°^o°̂ *FHCE

    Hon. Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 M

    PART 13NY? SUPREME COURTNYCALI.A.S. Part 13

    (Mendez)Index No: 125539/2000

    - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Docume|nt Relates to:IDA FLYNN, Individually and as Executrix forthe Estate of MARTIN E. FLYNN,Plaintiff,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    vs.A.C. and S., INC.., ET AL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. without prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto.

    ORDEjRED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: Newl York, New York

    L-LA . 2019

    Charles Fergjuson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

    IWC^\SO ORDERED, Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • SUPREME QOURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 100750/2003

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Document Relates to:JOSEPH A. BARLETTE, JR.,Plaintiff,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    vs.CONGOLEUM CORP., ET AL„

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiff s complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. without prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto.

    ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    \( /& , 2019c

    Charles Ferguson, Esq>-Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000 toSO ORDERED,

    Hon. Manuel J. MendezFEB0

    COUNTYCLERK'SO

    NEWYORK^\CfcMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • D

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 190252/2010

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    This Document Relates to:

    DENNIS W. ABSHER, as Executor for theEstate of CECIL W. ABSHER,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    Plaintiff,vs.

    . SMITljl WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETA.OAL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is

    ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejujiice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    l I t , 2019

    Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Lu xenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

    SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • BE®SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    'T.rJ

    JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)

    Index No: 190497/2011

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    RART 13NVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    This Document Relates to:

    AURELIO TORRES, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    Plaintiff,vs.

    AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEFETORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled] case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is

    RED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goiilds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    ORD

    Dated: New York, New York

    I , U , 2019\

    _Charles Ferguson, EsqcOWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

    SO ORDERED,

    ^ &Hon. Manuel J. Mendez G°MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 190089/2011

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Document Relates to:

    LUIGI GAMUTANO and CESIRAGARMTANO,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    Plaintiffs,vs.

    A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEILEFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is

    ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New Yorkl f /C . 2019

    Charles Ferguson, Esq\.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

    SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK D.

    j/\N 2 9NYCALI.A.S. Part 13 \(Mendez) \Index No: 190309/201

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13couRT - CIVIL

    NyS SUPREThis Document Relates to:

    ENEA CARTELLI, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    Plaintiff,vs.

    AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is

    ORDEjRED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New; York, New York'J / 4 , 2019

    . . . V J /5\

    Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

    SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.c.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    JAN 2 9 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 190327/2011

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    This Document Relates to:

    WAFIK RASSMY TAWFIK and MONATAWFIK,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    Plaintiffs,vs.

    A.O. SMITE WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEFEFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is

    ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    l f U , 2019c\ ^

    Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys fo::Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0Q6Phone: (212) 309-600*SO ORDERED,

    Hon. Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)

    Index No: 190379/2044

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBpSTOS LITIGATION

    JAN 2 9 2019PART 13

    NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILThis Document Relates to:

    DORSEY E. MORGAN and SHERRYMORGAN,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    Plaintiffs,vs.

    BORG-WARNER CORP., ET AL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEFLEFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint aga|nst defendant Goulds Pumps Incthere being nq opposition thereto, it is

    . and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, and

    ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goilds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed

    ice and without costs.without prejud

    Dated: New York, New Yorkl ( U , 2019

  • D.CT.

    SUPREME COMRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF IfJEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)Index No: 190310/2011

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Document Relates to:

    RICHARD K(LIS and RUTH KLIS,Plaintiffs,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    vs.A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, without prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is

    ORDERED that, upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc. and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    | / , /4 , 2 0 1 9

    Charles Ferguson,Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

    Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

    SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ S C.

  • In Re: First Judicial DistrictAsbestos Litigation JAN 2 9 2019

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY pF NEW YORK

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVIL

    THEODORE MAJKA,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

    Plaintiff Index No.: 190054/2009vs.

    GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, et al,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against GENUINE PARTS COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice toall co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORJDANY

    ERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant GENUINE PARTSare dismissed with prejudice and without costs.COMP

    Dated: N< ork, New York" ", 201^

    Dated: Buffalo, New York.2018iBELLO LLP BARCLAY DAMON LLP

    Jordan Fox, Ei a.Attorneys farMaintiff546 Fifth Ayenue, Fourth FloorNew YcAd^ New York 10036Telephone:(212) 681-1574

    Peter S. Marlette, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantGenuine Parts CompanyHie Avant Building, Suite 1200200 Delaware AvenueBuffalo, New York 14202Telephone: (716) 856-5500

    SO ORDERED:

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

    17341853.1

  • „v.;.\ .V

    First Judicial DistrictAsbestos Litigation

    ' SOV. jfISIn Re: • uJAN 2 9 2019

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13NYS SUPREME ("OIJRT - CIVIL

    HUBERT LEE KING, JR., as Personal Representativeof the Estate of HUBERT LEE KING, SR.and MIRIAM KING, Individually,

    UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERIndex No.: 2004-112168Plaintiffs,

    vs.

    PARTS COMPANY, et al,GENUINE

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint add cross-claims against GENUINE PARTS COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice toall co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant GENUINE PARTSCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New^foi .York Dated: Buffalo, New York&X . . 2018f 301BELLUCK & BARCLAY DAMON LLPJordan Foxj Esq.Attorneys for Pi546 Fifth Avenud, FiNew York, New Yojk 10036Telephone: (212) 681-1574

    Peter S. Marlette, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantGenuine Parts CompanyThe Avant Building, Suite 1200200 Delaware AvenueBuffalo, New Yotk 14202Telephone: (716) 856-5500

    F \ ^

    ti\Floor

    SO ORDERED:

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C, fee o l

    c0UNTleifvôS OFFICE17341721,1

  • JAN 2 9 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

    NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILXNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    MEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    IN RE:

    XIndex No.: 125486/2000

    Relates to:This DocumenUNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    EDWARD LEWIS,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New YorlL New York

    /

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    / HP°IJJMBy:By:Lawrence G. Lee, Esa

  • D, e

    JAN 2 9 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

    NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILXNEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    IN RE:

    XIndex No.: 125486/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    EDWARD LEWIS,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summary

    judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Compiiny are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    VJLm By:By:4bln Dearie, Lawrence G. Lee, Es

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022

    515 MadisonNew York, h(347) 492-1152

    f \ V.£°« t roflSO ORDEREy.Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

    Qf f\C t

  • JAN 2 9SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    PART 13MYS 5UP^we COURT - CIVILXIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    XIndex No.: 125484/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    KEVIN J. HUNT,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys fo( Plaintiff

    Lawrence G. Lee, EBy:By:

    Dearie, Esq.

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152

    f \ V-SO ORDERED:

    Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019x

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURTNYCALI.A.S. Part 13

    (Mendez, M.)

    NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    IN RE: - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 125484/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    KEVIN J. HUNT,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summary

    judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    LlMllLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    'LBy;By: Lawrence G. Lee, Esq'fohn Dearie, Esq.137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 MadisonNew York, IN(347) 492-1152

    Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022

    F I L E D/~ASO ORDERED: FEB 0 1 2019COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

    NEW YORK

    Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J .S .C.

  • SUPREME CQURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019

    X PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    XIndex No.: 125488/2000

    This Document! Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    WALLY GRANT,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants ihere is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York,,New York

    imu?THE DEARli LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

    .awrence G. Lee,By:By:

    John Dearie, Esq.

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 MadisonNew York, N(347) 492-1152

    Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022

    f \ V-SO ORDEREj}: r'BceHon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019x

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 124585/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    GEORGE FILIPPONI,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summary

    judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New h oik, New York

    lLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    By:By:Lawrence G. Lee, E^

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    C7Jolin Dearie, Esq.

    Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022

    515 MadisonNew York, IS(347) 492-1152

    \\&>0 \ W'9SO ORDERED: Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C,

    Qff \C£

  • D

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019

    XPART 13

    NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    XIndex No.: 125488/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    WALLY GRANT,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summary

    judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    By:By:Lawrence G. Lee, Esq*John Dearie, Esq.

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152

    ft VSO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    COUNTYCLERK-

    NEWYORKMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    XJAN 2 9 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 124585/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    GEORGE FIL1PPONI,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New YorkpNew York

    i£mULLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    By:By:Lawrence G. Lg^Esq.John Dearie, Esq.

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, Nsw York 10022(347) 492-1152

    SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • SUPREME Co|uRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF IpEW YORK

    EW YORK CITYjkSBESTOS LITIGATION

    JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NYCAL

    I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 104690/2005

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    FELIPPO GRACI,

    X

    RjEFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in tlje above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    I

    dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York,/ New York

    WHE

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany / )

    By:By:ohn Dearie, Esq. Lawrence G. Le

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, hew York 10022(347) 492-1152

    so?f'ceSO ORDERED:CO

  • D

    SUPREME C OURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019

    XPART 13

    NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    IN RE:

    XIndex No.: 104684/2005

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    ALBERT FR\SER,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitlec. action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed witi prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

    £By:By: LLawrence G. Lee, Es,

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152

    SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.s.c.

  • D)ffJ l i l3SUPREME CDURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

    COUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9*XrAK

    't i JsypREK'-i COURT^1NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCALI.A.S. Part 13

    (Mendez, M.)

    IN RE: - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 104684/2005

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    ALBERT FRASER,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summary

    judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yqrk, New York

    LLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    Lawrence G. Lee, Esq?By:By:

    John Dearie, Esq.

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152 to

    SO ORDERE D:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    X JAN 2 9 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 111580/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    ARTHUR ERLAND,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Y k, New York

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    By:By:Lawrence G. L&6, Esq.John Dearie, Esq.

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 MadisonNew York, N(347) 492-1152

    Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022

    SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    S0 °̂eMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.c.

  • D. C-SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF N EW YORK JAN 2 9 2019xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 111580/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    ARTHUR ERLAND,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    D that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Compahy are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yofk, New York

    ORDE

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany r p

    AAAJ AJ-̂By:By:John Dearie, Esq. Lawrence G. Lee, Es;

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152

    /^\SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

    soff'ofc0

  • cD, Z3L_SUPREME C OURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019x

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURTIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    - CIVIL.

    XIndex No.: 116827/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    ROY EATON

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Y

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    1 PART 13! NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 116827/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    ROY EATON

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    U2LTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys foij Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany

    By: By:Lawrence G. Lee, Efsq.ohn

    515 MadisonNew York, N(212) 980-0404

    Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    * \ I*®SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF IS EW YORK

    X JAN 2 9 2019NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    IN RE:PART 13

    NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 116827/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    RAYMOND DOZIER,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorkfMUllTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

    By: By:Lawrence G. Lee^Esq.

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    F I L E DSO ORDERED:FEB 0 * 20'9Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    OFF'06MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • D) [EJSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019X

    NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    IN RE: PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 116827/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    RAYMOND DOZIER,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, Ne,w York

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany

    2By: By: 7llJUÛ s' , jLawrence G. Lee, E^.

    y

    John Dearie, Esq.

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, Eew York 10022(212) 980-0434

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    « \SO ORDERE Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J.S.c.

  • D.

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019

    x PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYCAL

    I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    IN RE:

    XIndex No.: 104691/2005

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    JAMES DOWLING,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Y|ork, New York

    I aq'ltaTHE DEARI E LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

    %By:By: J-John Dearie, Esq. Lawrence G. Lee, Esq.515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400 to

    SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • SUPREME C3URT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    X JAN 2 9 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    PART 13NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 104691/2005

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    JAMES DOWLING,

    X

    WHEFEFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    RED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    ORDE

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany / )1

    By: By:Z17 Lawrence G. Lee, fisq.ohn Deane, Esq.

    515 MadisonNew York, N(347) 492-11:52

    Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    F I L E DSO ORDERED: o 1Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.COUNTY CLERKS

    O

    NEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J.S.C.

  • D.SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 20^9x

    PART 13NYS SUPR£M£ COURT

    IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 116819/2000

    This Documew; Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    GEORGE E. DIXON,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, NewiYork

    i m mTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

    r'*'

    /

    By:By:Lawrence G. Lee, 6sq.

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, Lew York 10022(212) 980-0404

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    F I L E DSO ORDERED:FEB 0 * 2019

    couN1Teif?o^Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    S QpF\C6MANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J .S .C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 116819/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    GEORGE E. D XON,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDEEED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yo rk, New York

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany

    % By:By:John Dearie, Esq. Lawrence G. Lee, Esq.

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(212) 980-04C 4

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    /''XSO ORDEREE9 \ TO'9Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    JAN 2 9 2019xNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13

    NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 102391/2002

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    PATRICK DALY,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

    THE DEARIIf LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    By:By:John Dearie, Lawrence G. Lee, E&tp

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152

    F \ V-£°SO ORDEREp: 01fEBHon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 102391/2002

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    PATRICK DA LY,

    X

    EFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    WHEF

    l

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany ^

    By: By:John Dearie, Esq. Lawrence G. Lee^Esq.

    515 MadisonNew York, fs(347) 492-1152

    Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    SO ORDERED:1WHon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.c«

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019X

    IS EW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    IN RE: PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 104668/2005

    This Document Relates to: UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    LUIGI CRISCI,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants tiere is no opposition, it is

    ORDEFJED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yorl/, New York

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

    THE DEARIIji LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    TABy:By:Lawrence G. Lee, Esq.Johh Dearie, Esq.

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-llj52

    F I L E DSO ORDERED: Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J.S.C.

    01 2019

    COUNTYCLERK'S

    NEWYORK

    fffl

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    JAN 2 9 2019xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 104668/2005

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    LUIGI CRISCl,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yorli:, New York

    lTHE DEARB LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany

    ;ûBy:By:John Dearie, Esq. Lawrence G.

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022

    515 MadisonNew York, N(347) 492-1152

    F I L E DSO ORDERED: FEB 0 1 2019

    COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

    Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • SUPREME CpURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    PART 13NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 116826/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    JOSEPH BUONOCORE,

    X

    WHEFLEFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    LiUMTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys foij Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

    By:By: jLawrence G. Lee,Jo earie, bsq.

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 MadisonNew York, N(212) 980-0404

    Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022

    FILED/-A FEB0

    COUNTYCLERiw,

    NEWYORK

    SO ORDERED:

    1*8?***Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J.S .C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    X JAN 2 9 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 116826/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    JOSEPH BUQNOCORE,

    X

    WHEFLEFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    v York, New YorkDated: New

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys fori Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany ^By:By:

    Lawrence G. Lee,Esqohn Deari

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 MadisonNew York, N(212) 980-0404

    Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022

    F I L E D' *A/— \ « \ IWSO ORDERED: Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J .S .C.

  • LnSUPREME CO LJRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 116822/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    REGINALD BOUCHER,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDEFLED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yofk, New York

    / tTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

    muBy: By:(Lhn Dearie, Esq. Lawrence G. Lee, Esq.

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    /-ASO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.s.c.

    G

  • D.SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 116822/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    REGINALD B OUCHER,

    X

    WHERjEFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yoijk, New YorkiMMTHE DEARI E LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys foil Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany )

    By:By:Join Dearie, Esq. Lawrence G. Lee, E&q.

    515 MadisonNew York, h(212) 980-0404

    Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    eof"-SO ORDERE1 D: \V1«Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J.S.C.ff'O6

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    JAN 2 9 2019xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 104669/2005

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    VICTOR BINGHI,

    X

    WHEFEFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New 'York, New York

    /THE DEARIjE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

    By:By:Lawrence G. Led;John Dearie, Esq.

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    Avenue, Suite 1118ew York 10022

    515 MadisonNew York, N(347) 492-1152 eoFILSO ORDERED:

    Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    COUNTYCimKS0

    NEWYORKMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • P. cfSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 104669/2005

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    VICTOR BINGHI,

    X

    WHEILEFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    . ^ork, New YorkiMMiS.Dated: NewTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany

    Id By:Lawrence G. Lee/Esq.

    ABy:Jolin Dearie, Esq.

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    p \ v.fc°SO ORDERED: o110«fEBHon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.Off'06MANUELJ MENDEZ

    J.s.c.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    XJAN 2 9 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    X

    This Document Relates to: Index No.: 113863/2005UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    ANTHONY DE ROSA,

    X

    WEEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, improperly sued as TheRockbestos Company requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant toCivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claimsagainst RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, improperly sued as The Rockbestos Company with

    prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & Cable

    LLC, improperly sued as The Rockbestos Company are dismissed with prejudice and

    without costs.Dated: New Ydrk, New York

    /LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC,improperly sued as Th^Tlockbestos Company

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    By:By:Andrew J. MundoJohn 0earie

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 Madison Ave, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980- 0404

    F \ \- H °FEB 01 2019

    COUNTY CLERK'St

    NEW YORKSO ORDERED:

    S QFBC£Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL PART 13I.A.S. Part il TITS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL(Mendez, M.)

    X

    This Document Relates to: Index No.: 116925/03

    UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    EDWARD JOHNSON

    X

    WFEREFORE, defendant Darcoid Company (“ Darcoid” ), incorrectly sued asDarcoid Co. of California d/b/a Darcoid Rubber Co., requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingthe complaint and cross-claims against Darcoid with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Darcoid aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    AITHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Darcoid Company

    By: (HhkAjA.AA.By:Lawrence G. Lee

    e®515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980- 0555

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    \iwfpe»

    SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C.

  • D.SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    JAN 2 9 2019XNEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    IN RE: PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    X

    Index No.: 105495/05This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    BERNARD SMAHL

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Darcoid Company (“ Darcoid” ), requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Darcoid with prejudice, iind afternotice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Darcoid aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    3ALLLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys forJDarcoid Company

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    i

    By:John Dearie Lawrence G. Li

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0555

    / SSO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • D,

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019

    x PART 13|\T'S SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYCAL

    I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    IN RE:

    X

    Index No.: 116400/2004This Document Relates to:

    UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    ROSARIO CORABI

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Darcoid Company (“ Darcoid” ), incorrectly sued asDarcoid Co. of California d/b/a Darcoid Rubber Co., requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingthe complaint and cross-claims against Darcoid with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Darcoid aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Vork.New York

    /

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Darcoid Company

    /

    By:By:Lawrence G. Le

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0555

    SO ORDERED:SHon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019X

    NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    IN RE: NYCALI.A.S. Part 13 'COuK’ ^(Mendez, M.)

    - »-«!

    X

    This Document Relates to: Index No.: 112894/05UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    RALPH TREPICCIONE

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Darcoid Company (“ Darcoid” ), requests nummaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Darcoid with prejudice, and afternotice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Darcoid aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, York

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Darcoid Company

    By:By:ohirDearie Lawrence G. L

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0555

    SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. cocker

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019

    x PART 13N> S SUPREME COURT - CIVILNEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONIN RE: NYCAL

    I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    X

    This Document Relates to: Index No.: 113926/05UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    MICHAEL TANNIAN

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Darcoid Company (“ Darcoid” ), requests nummaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Darcoid with prejudice, and afternotice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Darcoid aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York,,New York

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Darcoid Company

    Wt g^By:By: John Dearie Lawrence G. Le515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0555

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

    MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C .

  • D, C,

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019

    x PART 13(JPREME COURT - CIVILNYCAL

    I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    IN RE: NYS S!

    XIndex No.: 125990/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGME NTMOTION AND ORDER

    MARY SAUER, as Executrix for the Estate ofEDWARD J. SAUER,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    / lLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    lIBy:By: JUUJUALawrence G. Lee, EsafJohn Dearie, Esq.

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152

    F' 6?SO ORDERED: Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J.S.C.

  • D.SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019

    X j PART 13NY|S SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYCAL

    I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    IN RE:

    XIndex No.: 125990/2000

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    MARY SAUER, as Executrix for the Estate ofEDWARD J. SAUER,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requests summary

    judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany/-

    THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    3LBy:By:Lawrence G. Lee,ohn Dearie, Esq. ;q.

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152 to

    A WSO ORDERED:

    0̂ '°Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J.S.C.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

    PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XIndex No.: 104659/2005

    This Document Relates to:UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDE R

    KALJO LAIDLA,

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is

    ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    IpmTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

    By: By:ohn Deane, Esq. Lawrence G. Lee, Esq.

    515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, New York 10022(347) 492-1152

    137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

    tPFILSO ORDERED: IWHon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ

    J.S.C.

  • eD. eSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    JAN 2 9 2019XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBEST