Foams Algebraic Structures Derived from Essential …saito/talks/talk09Waseda.pdfAlgebraic...
Transcript of Foams Algebraic Structures Derived from Essential …saito/talks/talk09Waseda.pdfAlgebraic...
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Algebraic Structures Derived from EssentialSurfaces and Foams
Masahico Saito (U. of South Florida)Coauthor: J. Scott Carter
Waseda University, December 25, 2009
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Outline
1 Motivations
2 Essential surfaces
3 Frobenius pairs
4 Constructions
5 Foams
6 Lie algebras
7 Bialgebras
8 Skein modules
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Background
{ (1 + 1)-TQFTs } 1−1↔ { Commutative Frobenius algebras }A
A A
Diagrammatics of Frobenius algebras, generating operators:
Transposition
!µ
Multiplication Comultiplication
" #
Unit
$
Counit (Frobenius form)
Relations:
CommutativeUnit
Associativity Coassociativity Compatibility
Counit
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Problem
Problem: Characterize TQFTs of essential surface cobordismsand foams.
A E
E
1
A A A A
A A
2
3
We focus on thickened surfaces F × [0, 1] and sl(3)-foams, andinvestigate their algebraic structures.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Problem
Problem: Characterize TQFTs of essential surface cobordismsand foams.
A E
E
1
A A A A
A A
2
3
We focus on thickened surfaces F × [0, 1] and sl(3)-foams, andinvestigate their algebraic structures.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Motivations
A natural question as generalizations of (1 + 1)-TQFT.
Essential cobordisms are used in global Khovanovhomology by Asaeda–Przytycki-Sikora [APS] (for thickenedsurfaces F × [0, 1]), Turaev-Turner [TT] (unorientedTQFT) and Ishii-Tanaka [IT] (for virtual knots, cf.[Manturov]). They should have algebraic structures.
Foams appear in sl(3) Khovanov homology [Mackaay-Vaz].
By considering such algebraic structures of generalizedTQFTs, new generalizations of KhoHo may be found.
Possible refinements of Bar-Natan modules byAsaeda-Frohman, Kaiser.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Motivations
A natural question as generalizations of (1 + 1)-TQFT.
Essential cobordisms are used in global Khovanovhomology by Asaeda–Przytycki-Sikora [APS] (for thickenedsurfaces F × [0, 1]), Turaev-Turner [TT] (unorientedTQFT) and Ishii-Tanaka [IT] (for virtual knots, cf.[Manturov]). They should have algebraic structures.
Foams appear in sl(3) Khovanov homology [Mackaay-Vaz].
By considering such algebraic structures of generalizedTQFTs, new generalizations of KhoHo may be found.
Possible refinements of Bar-Natan modules byAsaeda-Frohman, Kaiser.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Motivations
A natural question as generalizations of (1 + 1)-TQFT.
Essential cobordisms are used in global Khovanovhomology by Asaeda–Przytycki-Sikora [APS] (for thickenedsurfaces F × [0, 1]), Turaev-Turner [TT] (unorientedTQFT) and Ishii-Tanaka [IT] (for virtual knots, cf.[Manturov]). They should have algebraic structures.
Foams appear in sl(3) Khovanov homology [Mackaay-Vaz].
By considering such algebraic structures of generalizedTQFTs, new generalizations of KhoHo may be found.
Possible refinements of Bar-Natan modules byAsaeda-Frohman, Kaiser.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Motivations
A natural question as generalizations of (1 + 1)-TQFT.
Essential cobordisms are used in global Khovanovhomology by Asaeda–Przytycki-Sikora [APS] (for thickenedsurfaces F × [0, 1]), Turaev-Turner [TT] (unorientedTQFT) and Ishii-Tanaka [IT] (for virtual knots, cf.[Manturov]). They should have algebraic structures.
Foams appear in sl(3) Khovanov homology [Mackaay-Vaz].
By considering such algebraic structures of generalizedTQFTs, new generalizations of KhoHo may be found.
Possible refinements of Bar-Natan modules byAsaeda-Frohman, Kaiser.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Motivations
A natural question as generalizations of (1 + 1)-TQFT.
Essential cobordisms are used in global Khovanovhomology by Asaeda–Przytycki-Sikora [APS] (for thickenedsurfaces F × [0, 1]), Turaev-Turner [TT] (unorientedTQFT) and Ishii-Tanaka [IT] (for virtual knots, cf.[Manturov]). They should have algebraic structures.
Foams appear in sl(3) Khovanov homology [Mackaay-Vaz].
By considering such algebraic structures of generalizedTQFTs, new generalizations of KhoHo may be found.
Possible refinements of Bar-Natan modules byAsaeda-Frohman, Kaiser.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Motivations
A natural question as generalizations of (1 + 1)-TQFT.
Essential cobordisms are used in global Khovanovhomology by Asaeda–Przytycki-Sikora [APS] (for thickenedsurfaces F × [0, 1]), Turaev-Turner [TT] (unorientedTQFT) and Ishii-Tanaka [IT] (for virtual knots, cf.[Manturov]). They should have algebraic structures.
Foams appear in sl(3) Khovanov homology [Mackaay-Vaz].
By considering such algebraic structures of generalizedTQFTs, new generalizations of KhoHo may be found.
Possible refinements of Bar-Natan modules byAsaeda-Frohman, Kaiser.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Outline
1 Motivations
2 Essential surfaces
3 Frobenius pairs
4 Constructions
5 Foams
6 Lie algebras
7 Bialgebras
8 Skein modules
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Generating maps
Generating maps for some saddle points:
A
A E E A
A A
∆
A
A A
A E E A
EE
EE
EE
EE
A
µ
E E
E E
E
EA
These suggest module and comodule structures over Frobeniusalgebras.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Generating maps
Generating maps for some saddle points:
A
A E E A
A A
∆
A
A A
A E E A
EE
EE
EE
EE
A
µ
E E
E E
E
EA
These suggest module and comodule structures over Frobeniusalgebras.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Relations
Relations are checked case by case.For example, if a handle is present as depicted, we obtain arelation:
v
H 1
wv
w1A
1B
1C
v
w
1D
1A
1B 1C
1D
v
w
1A
1D
1B 1B
1D
1C 1C
1Aw
v
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Outline
1 Motivations
2 Essential surfaces
3 Frobenius pairs
4 Constructions
5 Foams
6 Lie algebras
7 Bialgebras
8 Skein modules
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Frobenius pairs
By checking all conditions in [APS],
Definition
We propose a commutative Frobenius pair (A,E ):
(i) A = (mA,∆A, ιA, εA) is a commutative Frobenius algebraover k .(ii) E is an A-bimodule and A-bicomodule, with the same rightand left actions and coactions.
(4)(1)
A E
a x
a x1A
x
a b x
b x
a ( b x )
xba
ab
( ab ) x
(2) (3)
x
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Frobenius pairs (cont.)
These should satisfy variety of conditions:
Roughly, the dotted line does not end at a trivalent vertex,while a solid line can. All relations that satisfy this conditionhold.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Mobius maps
Three maps
E
E
A
A E
E
are called Mobius maps if they satisfy:
(9)
(1) (2) (3)
(5) (6) (7)
(4)
(8) (10)
corresponding to non-orientable cobordisms.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Mobius maps
For example, Case (4) of [APS] gives rise to one of theconditions:
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Examples
Example
For [APS]: A = Z[X ]/(X 2), E = 〈Y ,Z 〉Z withcorrespondence: 1↔ −, X ↔ +, Y ↔ −0, Z ↔ +0.Multiplications: XY = XZ = Y 2 = Z 2 = 0 and YZ = X .Comultiplications:
∆(1) = 1⊗ X + X ⊗ 1 + Y ⊗ Z + Z ⊗ Y ,
∆(X ) = X ⊗ X , ∆(Y ) = X ⊗ Y , ∆(Z ) = X ⊗ Z .
Mobius maps: ν(1) = Y + Z , ν(X ) = 0, ν(Y ) = ν(Z ) = X .
Example
For [TT]: A = E = Z2[X , λ±1]/(X 2 − hX ) with h = λ2. Allmutiplications and comultiplications are those of A. AllMobius maps are defined by multiplication by λ.
Note: (µ∆)(1) = h = λ2, .
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Examples
Example
For [APS]: A = Z[X ]/(X 2), E = 〈Y ,Z 〉Z withcorrespondence: 1↔ −, X ↔ +, Y ↔ −0, Z ↔ +0.Multiplications: XY = XZ = Y 2 = Z 2 = 0 and YZ = X .Comultiplications:
∆(1) = 1⊗ X + X ⊗ 1 + Y ⊗ Z + Z ⊗ Y ,
∆(X ) = X ⊗ X , ∆(Y ) = X ⊗ Y , ∆(Z ) = X ⊗ Z .
Mobius maps: ν(1) = Y + Z , ν(X ) = 0, ν(Y ) = ν(Z ) = X .
Example
For [TT]: A = E = Z2[X , λ±1]/(X 2 − hX ) with h = λ2. Allmutiplications and comultiplications are those of A. AllMobius maps are defined by multiplication by λ.
Note: (µ∆)(1) = h = λ2, .
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Virtual circles with poles
,
Smoothings for the Miyazawa polynomial
,
Smoothings of a virtual Hopf link
A circle with pairs of opposite poles are considered essential.The two smoothings correspond to a cobordism betweenessential and inessential circles.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Virtual circles with poles
,
Smoothings for the Miyazawa polynomial
,
Smoothings of a virtual Hopf link
A circle with pairs of opposite poles are considered essential.The two smoothings correspond to a cobordism betweenessential and inessential circles.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Virtual circles with poles
(1) (3)(2)
Relations among poles in the Miyazawa polynomial
(3)(1) (2)
Hemmed cobordisms formed by poles
Cobordisms of virtual circles with poles have a structure ofcommutative Frobenius pairs with Mobius maps.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Outline
1 Motivations
2 Essential surfaces
3 Frobenius pairs
4 Constructions
5 Foams
6 Lie algebras
7 Bialgebras
8 Skein modules
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Constructions
A generalization of [APS]:
Theorem
Let A = Z[X , h, t]/(X 2 − hX − t) and E = 〈Y ,Z 〉. If (A,E ) isa commutative Frobenius pair with Mobius maps such thatµE
E ,E = ∆E ,EE = 0, then A must be A = Z[X , a]/(X − a)2. For
this A, operations are defined by
XY = aY , XZ = aZ , Y 2 = cYY (X − a),
YZ = cYZ (X − a), Z 2 = cZZ (X − a),
∆A,EE (Y ) = (X − a)⊗ Y , ∆A,E
E (Z ) = (X − a)⊗ Z ,
∆E ,EA (1) = dYY Y ⊗ Y + dYZ Y ⊗ Z + dYZ Z ⊗ Y
+dZZ Z ⊗ Z , ∆E ,EA (X ) = a ∆E ,E
A (1),
for some constants that satisfy certain conditions.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Constructions
[APS ] New
A Z[X ]/(X 2) Z[X , a]/(X − a)2
XY 0 aYXZ 0 aZY 2 0 cYY (X − a)Z 2 0 cZZ (X − a)YZ 0 cYZ (X − a)
∆A,EE (Y ) X ⊗ Y (X − a)⊗ Y
∆A,EE (Z ) X ⊗ Z (X − a)⊗ Z
∆E ,EA (1) Y ⊗ Z + Z ⊗ Y dYY Y ⊗ Y + dYZ Y ⊗ Z
+dYZ Z ⊗ Y + dZZ Z ⊗ Z
∆E ,EA (X ) 0 a ∆E ,E
A (1)νEE 0 0νAE (Y ) X eY (X − a)νAE (Z ) X eZ (X − a)νEA (1) Y + Z fY Y + fZ Z
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Constructions
A generalization of [TT]:
Theorem
Let A be a commutative Frobenius algebra with handle elementφ, such that there exists an element ξ ∈ A with ξ2 = φ. Thenthere exists a commutative Frobenius pair with Mobius maps.
Corollary
Let A = E = k[X ]/(X 2 − hX − t), where k = Z[a±1, b±1], andh = −2b−1(a− b−1), t = −b−2(a2 + h). Then (A,E ) givesrise to a commutative Frobenius pair with Mobius maps.
Proof. Let ξ = a + bX , and one computes thatξ2 = φ = 2X − h.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Constructions
A generalization of [TT]:
Theorem
Let A be a commutative Frobenius algebra with handle elementφ, such that there exists an element ξ ∈ A with ξ2 = φ. Thenthere exists a commutative Frobenius pair with Mobius maps.
Corollary
Let A = E = k[X ]/(X 2 − hX − t), where k = Z[a±1, b±1], andh = −2b−1(a− b−1), t = −b−2(a2 + h). Then (A,E ) givesrise to a commutative Frobenius pair with Mobius maps.
Proof. Let ξ = a + bX , and one computes thatξ2 = φ = 2X − h.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Constructions
A generalization of [IT]:
Theorem
Let A be a commutative Frobenius algebra with handle elementφ such that its handle element φ ∈ A is invertible, then thereexists a commutative Frobenius pair (A,E ) with Mobius maps.
Idea of Proof: Take E = A⊗ A and define maps as follows:
2ν0φ
ν1φ
e0e1 e2
φφ φ
φν
There is a solution for constants: e0 = −1, e1 = e2 = −2,ν0 = 1, ν1 = −1 and ν2 = 0.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Outline
1 Motivations
2 Essential surfaces
3 Frobenius pairs
4 Constructions
5 Foams
6 Lie algebras
7 Bialgebras
8 Skein modules
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Example
In [Mackaay-Vaz], the sl(3)-invariant was described by foams,with Frobenius algebra structure defined byA = Z[a, b, c][X ]/(X 3 − aX 2 − bX − c)with the multiplication and the unit are defined by those forpolynomials,the Frobenius form (counit) ε is defined byε(1) = ε(X ) = 0, ε(X 2) = −1,the comultiplication is computed as
∆(1) = −(1⊗ X 2 + X ⊗ X + X 2 ⊗ 1)
+a(1⊗ X + X ⊗ 1) + b(1⊗ 1),
∆(X ) = −(X ⊗ X 2 + X 2 ⊗ X ) + a(X ⊗ X )− c(1⊗ 1),
∆(X 2) = −(X 2 ⊗ X 2)− b(X ⊗ X )− c(1⊗ X + X ⊗ 1).
What does the branch line represent?
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Example
In [Mackaay-Vaz], the sl(3)-invariant was described by foams,with Frobenius algebra structure defined byA = Z[a, b, c][X ]/(X 3 − aX 2 − bX − c)with the multiplication and the unit are defined by those forpolynomials,the Frobenius form (counit) ε is defined byε(1) = ε(X ) = 0, ε(X 2) = −1,the comultiplication is computed as
∆(1) = −(1⊗ X 2 + X ⊗ X + X 2 ⊗ 1)
+a(1⊗ X + X ⊗ 1) + b(1⊗ 1),
∆(X ) = −(X ⊗ X 2 + X 2 ⊗ X ) + a(X ⊗ X )− c(1⊗ 1),
∆(X 2) = −(X 2 ⊗ X 2)− b(X ⊗ X )− c(1⊗ X + X ⊗ 1).
What does the branch line represent?
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Example
In [Mackaay-Vaz], the sl(3)-invariant was described by foams,with Frobenius algebra structure defined byA = Z[a, b, c][X ]/(X 3 − aX 2 − bX − c)with the multiplication and the unit are defined by those forpolynomials,the Frobenius form (counit) ε is defined byε(1) = ε(X ) = 0, ε(X 2) = −1,the comultiplication is computed as
∆(1) = −(1⊗ X 2 + X ⊗ X + X 2 ⊗ 1)
+a(1⊗ X + X ⊗ 1) + b(1⊗ 1),
∆(X ) = −(X ⊗ X 2 + X 2 ⊗ X ) + a(X ⊗ X )− c(1⊗ 1),
∆(X 2) = −(X 2 ⊗ X 2)− b(X ⊗ X )− c(1⊗ X + X ⊗ 1).
What does the branch line represent?
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Example
In [Mackaay-Vaz], the sl(3)-invariant was described by foams,with Frobenius algebra structure defined byA = Z[a, b, c][X ]/(X 3 − aX 2 − bX − c)with the multiplication and the unit are defined by those forpolynomials,the Frobenius form (counit) ε is defined byε(1) = ε(X ) = 0, ε(X 2) = −1,the comultiplication is computed as
∆(1) = −(1⊗ X 2 + X ⊗ X + X 2 ⊗ 1)
+a(1⊗ X + X ⊗ 1) + b(1⊗ 1),
∆(X ) = −(X ⊗ X 2 + X 2 ⊗ X ) + a(X ⊗ X )− c(1⊗ 1),
∆(X 2) = −(X 2 ⊗ X 2)− b(X ⊗ X )− c(1⊗ X + X ⊗ 1).
What does the branch line represent?
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Example
In [Mackaay-Vaz], the sl(3)-invariant was described by foams,with Frobenius algebra structure defined byA = Z[a, b, c][X ]/(X 3 − aX 2 − bX − c)with the multiplication and the unit are defined by those forpolynomials,the Frobenius form (counit) ε is defined byε(1) = ε(X ) = 0, ε(X 2) = −1,the comultiplication is computed as
∆(1) = −(1⊗ X 2 + X ⊗ X + X 2 ⊗ 1)
+a(1⊗ X + X ⊗ 1) + b(1⊗ 1),
∆(X ) = −(X ⊗ X 2 + X 2 ⊗ X ) + a(X ⊗ X )− c(1⊗ 1),
∆(X 2) = −(X 2 ⊗ X 2)− b(X ⊗ X )− c(1⊗ X + X ⊗ 1).
What does the branch line represent?
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Example (cont.)
Following our approach, evaluate the branch line operation byskein relation. For A = Z[X ]/(X N), for example, it looks like:
0
kX
X j
X jkX
X jkX
i
1!
XiX N 1 iN
[X j ,X k ] =N−1∑i=0
θ(X i ,X j ,X k)X N−1−i
Theorem
The branch curve operation [ , ] is skew-symmetric andsatisfies the Jacobi identity:
[U, [V ,W ]] + [V , [W ,U]] + [W , [U,V ]].
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Example (cont.)
Following our approach, evaluate the branch line operation byskein relation. For A = Z[X ]/(X N), for example, it looks like:
0
kX
X j
X jkX
X jkX
i
1!
XiX N 1 iN
[X j ,X k ] =N−1∑i=0
θ(X i ,X j ,X k)X N−1−i
Theorem
The branch curve operation [ , ] is skew-symmetric andsatisfies the Jacobi identity:
[U, [V ,W ]] + [V , [W ,U]] + [W , [U,V ]].
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Example (cont.)
Using the Frobenius form, define ∆ : A→ A⊗ A by∆(V ) =
∑[V , 1(1)]⊗ 1(2), where ∆(u) =
∑u(1) ⊗ u(2).
Similarly, for ∆, denote ∆(u) =∑
u((1)) ⊗ u((2)).
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Example (cont.)
Theorem
For A = Z[a, b, c]/(X 3− aX 2−bX − c) with θ values as above,the map ∆ : A→ A⊗ A satisfies the following identities:
(m⊗ id)(id⊗∆) = ∆(1)(εµ)− τ,( (m⊗ id)(id⊗∆) )2 = id + ∆(1)(εµ),
m∆ = 2 id.
2
Same as sl(3) relations!
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Example (cont.)
Theorem
For A = Z[a, b, c]/(X 3− aX 2−bX − c) with θ values as above,the map ∆ : A→ A⊗ A satisfies the following identities:
(m⊗ id)(id⊗∆) = ∆(1)(εµ)− τ,( (m⊗ id)(id⊗∆) )2 = id + ∆(1)(εµ),
m∆ = 2 id.
2
Same as sl(3) relations!
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Example (cont.)
Relations to foam skeins:
Lie alg.Rep. of q-gp→ quantum knot inv.
Categorify by foams→ KhoHoTQFT and foams→ Lie alg.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Example (cont.)
Relations to foam skeins:
Lie alg.Rep. of q-gp→ quantum knot inv.
Categorify by foams→ KhoHoTQFT and foams→ Lie alg.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Example (cont.)
Relations to foam skeins:
Lie alg.Rep. of q-gp→ quantum knot inv.
Categorify by foams→ KhoHoTQFT and foams→ Lie alg.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Example (cont.)
Relations to foam skeins:
Lie alg.Rep. of q-gp→ quantum knot inv.
Categorify by foams→ KhoHoTQFT and foams→ Lie alg.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Example (cont.)
Relations to foam skeins:
Lie alg.Rep. of q-gp→ quantum knot inv.
Categorify by foams→ KhoHoTQFT and foams→ Lie alg.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Outline
1 Motivations
2 Essential surfaces
3 Frobenius pairs
4 Constructions
5 Foams
6 Lie algebras
7 Bialgebras
8 Skein modules
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Lie algebras
Are there other TQFTs and theta foam values that produce Liealgebras?
Theorem
For any positive odd integer N > 1, there exists a TQFT thatinduces a Lie algebra structure along branch circles.
Sketch proof. Let A = R[X ]/(X N) for an odd integer N > 1.For N > 3, define
θ(X a,X b,X c) =
1 if a = 0, b + c = N, 1 < b < c ,−1 if a = 0, b + c = N, 1 < c < b,0 otherwise
and the same values for cyclic permutations.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Lie algebras
Are there other TQFTs and theta foam values that produce Liealgebras?
Theorem
For any positive odd integer N > 1, there exists a TQFT thatinduces a Lie algebra structure along branch circles.
Sketch proof. Let A = R[X ]/(X N) for an odd integer N > 1.For N > 3, define
θ(X a,X b,X c) =
1 if a = 0, b + c = N, 1 < b < c ,−1 if a = 0, b + c = N, 1 < c < b,0 otherwise
and the same values for cyclic permutations.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Lie algebras
Are there other TQFTs and theta foam values that produce Liealgebras?
Theorem
For any positive odd integer N > 1, there exists a TQFT thatinduces a Lie algebra structure along branch circles.
Sketch proof. Let A = R[X ]/(X N) for an odd integer N > 1.For N > 3, define
θ(X a,X b,X c) =
1 if a = 0, b + c = N, 1 < b < c ,−1 if a = 0, b + c = N, 1 < c < b,0 otherwise
and the same values for cyclic permutations.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Outline
1 Motivations
2 Essential surfaces
3 Frobenius pairs
4 Constructions
5 Foams
6 Lie algebras
7 Bialgebras
8 Skein modules
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Bialgebras
Let A = R[G ] be the group ringwith a commutative unital ring R.∆(x) = x ⊗ x : bialgebra comultiplication∆(x) =
∑x=yz y ⊗ z : Frobenius algebra comultiplication
In this case, foams admit both structures(saddle ↔ Frobenius, branch lines ↔ bialgebra)only when every element of G is of order 2.
Compatibility ∆(xy) = ∆(x)∆(y)
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Bialgebras
Let A = R[G ] be the group ringwith a commutative unital ring R.∆(x) = x ⊗ x : bialgebra comultiplication∆(x) =
∑x=yz y ⊗ z : Frobenius algebra comultiplication
In this case, foams admit both structures(saddle ↔ Frobenius, branch lines ↔ bialgebra)only when every element of G is of order 2.
Compatibility ∆(xy) = ∆(x)∆(y)
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Bialgebras
Let A = R[G ] be the group ringwith a commutative unital ring R.∆(x) = x ⊗ x : bialgebra comultiplication∆(x) =
∑x=yz y ⊗ z : Frobenius algebra comultiplication
In this case, foams admit both structures(saddle ↔ Frobenius, branch lines ↔ bialgebra)only when every element of G is of order 2.
Compatibility ∆(xy) = ∆(x)∆(y)
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Outline
1 Motivations
2 Essential surfaces
3 Frobenius pairs
4 Constructions
5 Foams
6 Lie algebras
7 Bialgebras
8 Skein modules
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Skein modules
Definition
M : a compact 3-manifoldFF(M) : free module on foams in MFS(M) : submodule generated by skein relations in thefigure, where a dot represents x ∈ A = R[x ]/(x2 − 1)F(M) = FF(M)/FS(M) : the surface skein module with A
(Saddle)
!( (1) )
1 11
(Closed foams)
An analogue of Bar-Natan skein module by Asaeda-Frohman,Kaiser.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Skein modules
Definition
M : a compact 3-manifoldFF(M) : free module on foams in MFS(M) : submodule generated by skein relations in thefigure, where a dot represents x ∈ A = R[x ]/(x2 − 1)F(M) = FF(M)/FS(M) : the surface skein module with A
(Saddle)
!( (1) )
1 11
(Closed foams)
An analogue of Bar-Natan skein module by Asaeda-Frohman,Kaiser.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Conclusion
Conclusion:
For essential cobordisms:
We proposed an algebraic structure, commutative Frobeniuspairs, that describes essential cobordisms in thickened surfacesand cobordisms formed by virtual circles with poles.
Constructions and new examples are provided, that may beuseful in further generalizing Khovanov homology for thickenedsurfaces and virtual knots.
For foams:
We studied Lie algebra and bialgebra structures along branchcircles.
Skein modules and more general foams need more study.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Conclusion
Conclusion:
For essential cobordisms:
We proposed an algebraic structure, commutative Frobeniuspairs, that describes essential cobordisms in thickened surfacesand cobordisms formed by virtual circles with poles.
Constructions and new examples are provided, that may beuseful in further generalizing Khovanov homology for thickenedsurfaces and virtual knots.
For foams:
We studied Lie algebra and bialgebra structures along branchcircles.
Skein modules and more general foams need more study.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Conclusion
Conclusion:
For essential cobordisms:
We proposed an algebraic structure, commutative Frobeniuspairs, that describes essential cobordisms in thickened surfacesand cobordisms formed by virtual circles with poles.
Constructions and new examples are provided, that may beuseful in further generalizing Khovanov homology for thickenedsurfaces and virtual knots.
For foams:
We studied Lie algebra and bialgebra structures along branchcircles.
Skein modules and more general foams need more study.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Conclusion
Conclusion:
For essential cobordisms:
We proposed an algebraic structure, commutative Frobeniuspairs, that describes essential cobordisms in thickened surfacesand cobordisms formed by virtual circles with poles.
Constructions and new examples are provided, that may beuseful in further generalizing Khovanov homology for thickenedsurfaces and virtual knots.
For foams:
We studied Lie algebra and bialgebra structures along branchcircles.
Skein modules and more general foams need more study.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Conclusion
Conclusion:
For essential cobordisms:
We proposed an algebraic structure, commutative Frobeniuspairs, that describes essential cobordisms in thickened surfacesand cobordisms formed by virtual circles with poles.
Constructions and new examples are provided, that may beuseful in further generalizing Khovanov homology for thickenedsurfaces and virtual knots.
For foams:
We studied Lie algebra and bialgebra structures along branchcircles.
Skein modules and more general foams need more study.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Conclusion
Conclusion:
For essential cobordisms:
We proposed an algebraic structure, commutative Frobeniuspairs, that describes essential cobordisms in thickened surfacesand cobordisms formed by virtual circles with poles.
Constructions and new examples are provided, that may beuseful in further generalizing Khovanov homology for thickenedsurfaces and virtual knots.
For foams:
We studied Lie algebra and bialgebra structures along branchcircles.
Skein modules and more general foams need more study.
AlgebraicStructures
Derived fromEssential
Surfaces andFoams
MasahicoSaito
Motivations
Essentialsurfaces
Frobeniuspairs
Constructions
Foams
Lie algebras
Bialgebras
Skein modules
Conclusion
Conclusion:
For essential cobordisms:
We proposed an algebraic structure, commutative Frobeniuspairs, that describes essential cobordisms in thickened surfacesand cobordisms formed by virtual circles with poles.
Constructions and new examples are provided, that may beuseful in further generalizing Khovanov homology for thickenedsurfaces and virtual knots.
For foams:
We studied Lie algebra and bialgebra structures along branchcircles.
Skein modules and more general foams need more study.