Team 5 Group Project

Teaching in Middle &

Secondary School

FNDS 6010 Dr. Shumack Spring 2010

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Team Members

Introduction

Syllabus

Visual Model

Delivery Methods

Course Management

Options

TEAM MEMBERS

William Broadway

LaShonda Houser

Andrea Stewart

Kelli Strowd

Edward White

Tynisa Williams

INTRODUCTION

Online Course◦Content vs. Technical Environment

Course Management System◦Function vs. Features

Instructor◦Processes vs. Abilities

Students◦Pedagogy vs. Andragogy

Putting it all together

SYLLABUS

Course Description

Course Objectives

Course Calendar

Assessment Scale

Assessment Components

SYLLABUS: COURSE DESCRIPTION

Field experience will be required

This is an online course designed for the middle and secondary learning environment. It provides a foundation for students to learn instructional methods, the learning process, theory and application of curriculum development for various

academic disciplines, effective collaboration skills, professionalism, technology skills, and research methodology.

SYLLABUS: COURSE OBJECTIVES

Practice basic skills in computer literacy

Maintain an online journal

Be a contributing member of a Wiki

Participate in online discussions using Blog

Evaluate scholarly literature associated with middle and secondary learning environment

Plan and Organize an integrated unit plan

Design a classroom management plan

Submit assignments using a course management system

Observe experienced teachers

Evaluation Scale

Evaluation Components

COURSE CALENDARWEEK DATE TOPIC LECTURE READ PROJECTS DUE DATES

1 5/31

Intro & Ed -Philosophy

Video

~ Create Blog, www. blogspot.com~ Join Class Wiki Jun. 6, 10

2 6/7Lesson Plan Video Text

~ Create daily lesson plan-Team Discussion

Jun. 13, 10

3 6/14Class-room Mgmt

Video Two Articles~ Create WikiPage~ Download Jing Jun. 20, 10

COURSE CALENDAR

WEEK DATE TOPIC LECTURE READINGS PROJECTS DUE DATES

4 6/21ClassroomMgmt Video

Two Articles~ Create ClassroomMgmt Plan~ Team Disc Jun. 27, 10

5 6/28 VideoTwo Articles ~ Integrated Unit Plan

~ Overview Jing Project

Jun. 12, 10

6 7/12Unit Plan-ning Video

Two Articles~ Jing Presentation

Jul. 18, 10

COURSE CALENDAR

WEEK DATE TOPIC LECTURE READINGS PROJECTS DUE DATES

7 7/19

Teaching Philosophy Video

~Redefine TeachingPhilosophy~ 10 hr Ob due

Jul. 25, 10

8 7/26

~ Annotated Bibliog-raphy Due~ Final Exam Jul. 30, 10

Note: Blog post due with each weekly assignment.

ASSESSMENT SCALE

A 90 - 100

B 89 - 80

C 79 - 70

D 69 – 60

F 59 - Below

ASSESSMENT COMPONENTSTeam Discussions•5 points

Classroom Wiki Page•5 points

Blog Posts•5 points

Philosophy of Teaching•10points

Daily Lesson Plan•10 points

Group Unit Project•5 points

Annotated Bibliography•5 points

Final Exam•5 points

Total•100 Points

VISUAL MODEL

Teaching Middle and Secondary School

Readings Project Assessment Discussion

VISUAL MODEL

DELIVERY METHOD OPTIONS

Cam Studio (asynchronous)

Echo 360 (asynchronous)

Wimba (synchronous)

DELIVERY METHOD OPTIONS: ECHO 360

ECHO 360 (Asynchronous)

Industry Leading Screen Capture

Software

Create Learning on Demand

Easily Scalable Various Delivery Formats

DELIVERY METHOD OPTIONS: WIMBA

WIMBA (Synchronous)

Virtual Classroom

Robust Features

PedagogicalDesign

Advanced Features

DELIVERY METHOD OPTIONS: CAM STUDIO

CAMSTUDIO (Synchronous)

Screen Capture Program

Creates Industry

Standard AVI

Publish Streaming

Flash Media

COURSE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS

COURSE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS

Blackboards largest competitor

Collaboration and Communication are key

Has discussion boards, chats, email

State of Alabama uses program for high school ACCESS

www.desire2learn.com

Free Course Management System

Designed with pedagogy as main focus

Has blogs, forums, and moodle-docs

Has free demonstration page to experiment with program

www.moodle.com

REFERENCES

 ACCESS: Alabama connecting classroom, educators, & students statewide. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from https://access.desire2learn.com/

 Desire 2 learn: innovative learning technology. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://www.desire2learn.com/ Moodle. Retrieved February 20, 2010 from http://moodle.com/ Bird, L. (2007). The 3 ‘C” design model for networked collaborative e-learning: a tool for novice designers. Innovations in

Education and Teaching International, 44(2), 53-167. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from ProQuest Education Journals.  Brinkerhoff, J., & Koroghlanian, C.M. (2007). Online students’ expectations: enhancing the fit between online students and

course design. J. Educational Computing Research, 36, (4), 383-393. Retrieved February 15, 2010 from http://www.ebscohost.com

 Carmean, C., & Haefner, J. (2002). Mind over Matter: Transforming course management systems into effective learning

environments. EDUCAUSE Review, 37 (6), 26-34. Green, J. (1998). Andragogy: Teaching adults. In B. Hoffman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Technology. Retrieved February

1, 2010, from http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/Articles/andragogy/start.htm Kidney, G., Cummings, L., & Boehm, A. (2007). Toward a Quality Assurance Approach to E-Learning Courses. University of

Houston-Clear Lake, USA. International JI. On E-Learning, 6(1), 17-30. Kim, K. J. & Bonk, C. J. (2006). The Future of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Educause Quaterl,y, 4, 22-30. Krumsvik, R. J. (2008). Situated learning and teachers’ digital competence. Education Information Technology, 13, 279-290.

doi: 10.1007/s10639-00809069-5 Lane, L.M. (2009). Insidious pedagogy: how course management systems impact teaching. First Monday, 14, (10). Retrieved

February 14, 2010 from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewarticle/2530/2303  Lane, L. (2008). Toolbox or Trap? Course Management Systems and Pedagogy. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31 (2), 4-6.

Malikowski, S. R. (2008). Factors related to breadth of use in course management systems. Internet and Higher Education, 11 (2), 81-86.

 Meyer, K., & Smart, K. (2005). Changing Course Management Systems: Lessons Learned. EDUCUASE Quarterly, 28 (2),

68-70 Oblinger, D. G. & Hawkins, B. L. (2006). The Myth about Online Course Development. Educause Review, January &

February, 14-15. Rughooputh, S., & Santally, M.I. (2009). Integrating text to speech software into pedagogically sound teaching and

learning scenarios. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 57 (1), 131-146. Retrieved February 16, 2010, from ProQuest Education Journals.

 Seok, S. (2008). Teaching aspects of e-learning. International Journal on ELearning, 7(4), 725-741. Retrieved February

8, 2010, from ProQuest Education Journals.  Swinglehurst, D., Russell, J., & Greenhalgh, T. (2008). Peer observation of teaching in the online environment: An action

research approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 383-393. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00274.x. Tastle, W.J., White, B. A., & Shackleton, P. (2005). E-learning in higher education: the challenge, effort, and return on

investment. International Journal on ELearning, 4, (2), 241-251. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from ProQuest Education Journals.

 Williams, V. (2004). Teachnology: web-based instruction’s dual environment. International Journal on ELearning, 3, (4),

15-21. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from ProQuest Education Journals.

REFERENCES