FMDF cours 181025 - lem3.univ-lorraine.fr
Transcript of FMDF cours 181025 - lem3.univ-lorraine.fr
25/10/2018
1
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 1
The stress gradient at the root of the hole ( ), which will be noted to simplify
the writing ( ) , is obtained by differentiating the following relationships :y x a
x a
d dxσ =
=
)0 ( )
1( )
Elliptical hole
y y N x
D x
σ
σ=
∞ = +
) 2 4
0 1 31
2 2
Circular hole
y y a a
x x
σ
σ=
∞ = + +
2 4
3 5
6 7
Circular hole
y
x ax a
d a a
dx x x a
σ σσ∞
∞
==
= − − = −
( ) ( )( ) ( )
2 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 2
( ) ( 2 ) ( )With
( )
N x a a b x x c x c ab a b x
D x a b x c x c
= − − − − + −
= − − −
))
))
2 2 2 3
2 2
( ) 2 ( ) ( ) ( )From where and
'( ) ( ) (2 3 ) '( ) 3 ( )x a x a
x a x a
N x ab a b D x a b b
N x a a b a b D x ab a b= =
= =
= − = −= − − = −
3
(4 3 )
Elliptical hole
y
x a
d a a b
dx b
σσ ∞
=
+= −
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 2
The two previous relationships, can be put in a unique form
maxy
x a
d
dx
σ σγρ=
= −
The coefficient of proportionality γ has the same
expression for the two hole geometries
12
tK
γ = +
max
Circular hole
3aρ σ σ ∞= =2
max
Elliptical hole
1 2b a
a bρ σ σ ∞ = = +
2 3γ< <
7
Circular hole
y
x a
d
dx a
σ σ ∞
=
= −
3
(4 3 )
Elliptical hole
y
x a
d a a b
dx b
σσ ∞
=
+= −
max max7 17 2
3
Circular hole
ta K
σ σ σρ ρ
∞ − = − = − +
1/
max max4 3 4 32
2 2
Elliptical hole
tK
a b a b b
b a b a b
σ σ σρ ρ ρ
∞ + + − = − = − + + +
���
25/10/2018
2
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 3
Figure 7 gives the variations of stress σy along the axis of the notch,
for an elliptical hole (a/b=3, Kt=7) and for a circular hole (Kt=3).
This figure shows that the decrease of the stress is faster in the case
of the elliptical hole2.
Figure 7 : Changes in the stress
along the axis for an elliptical
hole and a circular hole2
Elliptical hole
a/b=3
Circular hole
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 4
Tutorial 3 : Stress gradient
A notched plate is loaded in tension. The stress gradient at the root
of the notch with stress concentration factor Kt and with notch
bottom radius ρ, is given by :max
maxis the maximum stress reached1
2 where at the root of the notch
y nom
t
t
dK
dx K
σ σ σ σρ
= − + =
Determine by linearizing this relationship
a- Distances δ along the axis of a 5mm diameter circular hole, where
the stress drops are respectively 2,5% and 10%.
b- The average stress in all grains adjacent to the root of a notch
where the stress drop does not exceed 10%. The plate loaded at σnom
= 20MPa, is made of low-alloy manganese steel with ferrite - pearlite
structure whose average grain size is dg=12µm. The notch is
elliptical in shape with a=2,5cm and b=0,5cm.
25/10/2018
3
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 5
c- the notch root radius ρ with factor Kt=5, knowing that the stress
drop is 5% at a point away than 50µm from the root of the notch.
Same question for a distant point 100µm from the root of the notch.
d- The stress concentration factor Kt of a notch root radius ρ=2mm,
knowing that the stress drop is 2,5% at a distance of 20µm.
e- The minimum and maximum distances where the stress drop is
5% for a notch whose root radius is ρ=1mm.
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 6
a- For a circular hole in a plate loaded in tension, the stresses
concentration factor is equal to 3. The notch root radius being
ρ=2,5mm (5mm diameter), the distance δ where the stress drop is
2,5%, is given by :
max max0,025 12
3 2,5
d
dx
σ σ σδ
− = = − +
The distance δ where the stress drop is 10%, is given by :
25/10/2018
4
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 7
b- The stress concentration factor is Kt=1+2*2,5/0,5=11. The
maximum stress is σmax=11*20=220MPa and the notch root radius is
ρ=0,52/2,5=1mm. The stress σ g1 reached at the end of the first grain,
is given by :
The average stress in this first grain, is :
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 8
The same calculation for the three other grains, gives :
The distance δ at which the stress droop reached 10%, is :
=4dg i.e. four grains
25/10/2018
5
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 9
c- Calculation of the notch root radius ρ for Kt=5, when the stress
drop is equal 5% at a distance δ=50µm, from the root of the notch
along the x-axis :
If δ=100mm, then the notch root radius ρ is :
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 10
d- Calculation of the stress concentration factor Kt, for a notch with
root radius ρ=2m, knowing that the stress drop is 2,5% at a distance
δ=20µm from the notch root along the axis.
e- Calculation of the minimum and maximum distances where the
stress drop is 5% for a notch with root radius ρ=1mm.
25/10/2018
6
Stress gradient along the edge of a notch
When structures are designed with notches, fatigue crack initiation usually occurs
at the root of the notch.
The surface state (surface roughness, presence or absence of scratches which
amplify the concentration of the stress ...) has a strong influence on this initiation.
Also, it is interesting to consider how the stresses vary along the edge of the notch.
Changes in stress at the edge of a circular hole are illustrated in figure 8, where the
main isostresses lines (lines of equal main stress) are determined by finite element
calculations : these lines are at levels of 90%, 80% and 50% of the maximum
stress3.
Figure 8 : (a) Variation of the stresses
at the edges of a circular hole
determined by finite element
calculations (b) Finite element mesh
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 11
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 12
These lines of equal main stresses, obtained thanks to the
development of computing resources at the beginning of the 80's,
confirm qualitatively measurements of stresses by the method of
photo elasticity ten years ago4.
25/10/2018
7
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 13
Large notches have a larger area of material along their edge and
therefore the risk of fatigue crack initiation is higher.
This relationship shows that the stress gradient is inversely
proportional to the notch root radius ρ.
It is therefore necessary to examine the scale effects on the stresses
concentration in the vicinity of a notch.
maxmax
is the maximum stress reached12 where
at the root of the notch
y nom
t
t
dK
dx K
σ σ σ σρ
= − + =
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 14
Influence of geometry and loading
on the stress concentration factor Kt
The theoretical determination of the stress concentration factor Kt (as
developed in the preceding paragraph) considers that the size of the
notch are very small compared to the dimensions of the structure.
Only the notch dimensions (a and b for an elliptical hole) involved
in the theoretical approach.
Let us now consider a tensile-
stressed plate, of width W and
length L, with a circular hole of
diameter D in its centre.
The figure against shows two
plates with this loading
configuration, of different sizes,
but having the same D/W and
D/L ratios.
25/10/2018
8
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 15
The SCF Kt is a dimensionless parameter. So, it depends only on
geometric ratios.
However, the plate 2 has a greater notch area heavily loaded and
therefore the probability of fatigue crack initiation is higher.
This observation makes it possible to apprehend the effects of
scale.
If all the dimensions of the
plate 2 are double those of
the plate 1 (figure against),
Kt factor and the maximum
stress reached at the root of
the notch are the same.
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 16
25/10/2018
9
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 17
Several specialized manuals provide the Kt values for a large number
of geometries and loading configurations4,5.
The figure against shows the
change in Kt factor for a plaque
of finite dimensions, edge
notched or with a circular hole in
its centre.
The variation of Kt factor for the
plate pierced in its centre, is given
by Heywood6 relation.
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 18
* Practical formulas for calculating Kt factor
Neuber7 formula are widely used to calculate the stress concentration
factor in structural elements such as plates or shafts with grooves or
shoulders.
25/10/2018
10
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 19
2 2
11
1 1
t
p q
K
aK bK
= +
+
where 1 12
p
dK
r= + −
1and
2qK
r
D d
=
−
Neuber formulas
The coefficients a and b in the Neuber formulas have different values
according to the geometry of the structural element and the type of
loading.
In shaft with semi circular groove,
loaded in tension a=1,197 b=1,871
for bending load a=0,715 b=2
loaded in torsion a=0,365 b=1
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 20
In shaft with a single shoulder,
loaded in tension a=0,88 b=0,843
for bending load a=0,541 b=0,843
loaded in torsion a=0,263 b=0,843
In shaft with a double shoulder,
If L > 2d, a and b have the same values
that in shaft with single shoulder
Else (L < 2d) must take Dequ=d+0,3L
and keep the same values a and b.
1 12
p
dK
r= + −
1
2qK
r
D d
=
−
2 2
11
1 1
t
p q
K
aK bK
= +
+
25/10/2018
11
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 21
The figure above shows, for given ration d/D, the changes in SCF Kt
for a shaft with shoulder loaded in tension or in bending : Neuber
formulas are used to calculate Kt factor as a function of r/D ratio.
Tension
Bending
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 22
A large connecting radius decreases the value of Kt factor, but in
practice it is not always possible to increase this radius. Also, we use
technological solutions such as the one shown in the figure below.
Solution to reduce
the Kt factor
25/10/2018
12
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 23
Notch overlay - Suppose that within a Kt1 factor notch is a Kt2
factor notch ; this schematic below is to be avoided in practice.
The maximum stress at point A located at the bottom of the small
hole is given by :
Where Kt=Kt1Kt2
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 24
let's now examine the pin-jointing of a hook with a clevis
(this case is often encountered in practice)
In section BB , the SCF Kt is high at point A.
Perforated pate
Hook
Pressure
distribution
25/10/2018
13
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 25
A
It is necessary to lubricate at point B and not at point A
where the stress concentration is high
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 26
A shouldered shaft of large diameter D=100mm, small diameter
d=64mm and fillet radius r=5mm, is subjected to combined tensile
force (F) , bending moment (Mf) and torque (Mt).
The shaft is steel yield strength σE =300MPa.
1- Determine the SCF Kt for each loading, using the Neuber
formulas.
2- Calculate the equivalent stress according to the Von Mises
criterion, for F= 50kN, Mf=100m.daN et Mt=500m.daN.
Does the shaft becomes plastic?
Tutorial 4 :Stress concentration in shaft
25/10/2018
14
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 27
3- Tensile and torsional loads are fixed to the previous values
(F=50kN and Mt=500m.daN), what is the value of bending moment
(Mf) is not exceeded to avoid the yielding of the shaft?
4- The radius of fillet is reduced to r=2mm. Does the shaft yielded if
the same loads are applied as in the question 2 (F=50kN,
Mf =100m.daN and Mt=500m.daN)?
Tensile and bending loads are fixed, what is the value of torque is
not exceeded to avoid the yielding of the shaft?
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 28
The shouldered shaft is replaced by a grooved shaft of large diameter
D=100mm, small diameter d=64mm and fillet radius r=5mm.
This shaft is submitted to the same loads (F= 50kN, Mf=100m.daN
et Mt=500m.daN). Same questions 1, 2 and 3 as in the previous case.
25/10/2018
15
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 29
1- Calculation of stress concentration factors
2 2
11
1 1
t
p q
K
aK bK
= +
+
where 1 12
p
dK
r= + −
1and
2qK
r
D d
=
−
Neuber formulas
In shaft with a single shoulder,
loaded in tension a=0,88 b=0,843
for bending load a=0,541 b=0,843
for torsional loading a=0,263 b=0,843
Tensile 2,10 Bending 1,80 Torque 1,44F T
t t tK K K= = =
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 30
Tensile
Bending
Torque
2- The equivalent stress according to the Von Mises criterion is :
The shaft does not yield, it remains elastic
25/10/2018
16
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 31
3- Tensile and torsional loads are fixed to the previous values
(F=50kN and Mt=500m.daN), what is the value of bending
moment (Mf) is not exceeded to avoid the yielding of the shaft?
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 32
4- The radius of fillet is reduced to r=2mm. Does the shaft
yielded if the same loads are applied as in the question 2
(F=50kN,
Mf =100m.daN and Mt=500m.daN)?
Tensile and bending loads are fixed, what is the value of torque
is not exceeded to avoid the yielding of the shaft?
Tensile Bending Torque
25/10/2018
17
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 33
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 34
2 2
11
1 1
t
p q
K
aK bK
= +
+
where 1 12
p
dK
r= + −
1and
2qK
r
D d
=
−
Tensile
Bending
Torque
The shouldered shaft is replaced by a grooved shaft of large diameter
D=100mm, small diameter d=64mm and fillet radius r=5mm.
This shaft is submitted to the same loads (F= 50kN, Mf=100m.daN
et Mt=500m.daN). Same questions 1, 2 and 3 as in the previous case.
Tensile 2,78 Bending 2,17 Torque 1,60F T
t t tK K K= = =
25/10/2018
18
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 35
Tensile
Bending
Torque
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 36
Influence of residual stresses on the stress
concentration factor Kt
- Residual stresses (or internal stresses) refer to a distribution of stresses following
inhomogeneous plastic deformation of the material.
- Residual stresses balance each other necessarily.
Consider the following distribution of residual stresses in a plate of thickness t :
-
-
+
+
In the absence of external loading, the balance
of forces and moments, leads to :
/ 2
/ 2
0
t
x
t
y dyσ−
=/ 2
/ 2
0
t
x
t
dyσ−
=
ext
aσext
moyσ →
ext
a aσ σ=
ext
moy moy resσ σ σ= +
If an external cyclic
loading (σaext , σmoy
ext )
is applied, we have :
25/10/2018
19
The residual stresses follow a plastic deformation that can have various origins :
- inhomogeneous plastic deformation near a notch ;
- Manufacturing processes that induce residual stresses (forging, stamping, deep
drawing …) ;
- Heat treatment ;
- Assembly of the components of a structure ….
Consider for example, a plate with a circular hole on its centre, loaded in
tension at σmax
> σE
+
-+
Residual stresses
after unloading
max nomtKσ σ<
• During unloading, the elastic part of platewill compress the plastic zone formed atthe root of the hole
• The residual stresses thus generated willbalance out
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 37
Plastic zone
Plastic partsElastic zone
Residual stresses
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 38
Calculation of residual stresses – Neuber assumption
When the maximum stresses remain less
than yield stress, the strains are proportional
at these stresses and then we have :
max t nomKσ σ= maxmax
t nomt nom
KK
E E
σ σε ε= = =
If the maximum stresses exceed the yield
stress, we have as shown in the figure opposite:
max t nomKσ σ<max t nom
Kε ε>
maxt
nom
K Kσσσ
= < maxt
nom
K Kεεε
= >
• Neuber hypothesis
(or Neuber rule)
2
tK K Kσ ε = ( )2
max max
t nomK
E
σσ ε =
25/10/2018
20
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 39
( )2
max max
t nomK
E
σσ ε =
The right term in this relationship, is
known.
We then determine σmax, graphically from
the constitutive law σ = σ(ε) .
t nomK σ
maxσ
resσ
( )σ σ ε=
( )2
t nomK
E
σσ ε⋅ =
maxε ε
At the intersection point A of the two
curves, σ = σ(ε) and σ .ε , σmax and εmax
satisfy the constitutive law.
In absence of plasticity, the maximum
stress is reached at point B.
The difference between Kt σnom (point B)
and σmax (point A) gives the residual
stress, which is a compressive stress.
res A B A t nomKσ σ σ σ σ= − = −
Graphic determination procedure
of σmax and εmax.
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 40
Tutorial 7 : Calculation of residual stresses
A steel plate of Young’s modulus E=200GPa and yield stress σE = 300MPa,
has a bilinear elastic plastic behaviour with a plastic Young’s modulus
Ep=E//20
Ai
1- Calculate the residual stress, and the
maximum stress reached at the root of a
notch of SCF Kt=2.5 ; the plate is loaded
at σnom = 200MPa and then unloaded.
Deduce the factors Kσ and Kε.
2- Same question as that at 1- with Kt=2
and Kt=3.
Constituve law ( )E p EEσ σ ε ε− = −
300At point 300 ( )
20A A
EA
Eσ ε= + −
25/10/2018
21
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 41
( ) ( )2 2
300Neuber hypothesis 300 ( )
20
t nom t nom
A A A
A
K KE
E E E
σ σσ ε σ
σ⋅ = = + −
2 285 12500 0 323,62A A A
MPaσ σ σ− − = =
1,62A
nom
Kσσ
σ= =
2
3,86tKK
Kσε = =
176, 4res A t nom res
K MPaσ σ σ σ= − = −
300At point 300 ( )
20A A
EA
Eσ ε= + −
Ai
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Stress concentration 42
300At point 300 ( )
20A A
EA
Eσ ε= + −
( )2
300NH 300 ( )
20
t nom
A
A
KE
E E
σσ
σ = + −
2a) 2 and 200t nomK MPaσ= =1,55A
nom
Kσσ
σ= =
2
2,57tKK
Kσε = =
2 285 8000 0 310,74A A A
MPaσ σ σ− − = =
89, 26res A t nom resK MPaσ σ σ σ= − = −
2b) 3 et 200t nomK MPaσ= =2 285 18000 0 338, 22A A A
MPaσ σ σ− − = =
261,78res A t nom res
K MPaσ σ σ σ= − = −
1,69A
nom
Kσσ
σ= =
2
5,32tKK
Kσε = =
Ai