FLL Project Feedback (JUDGE's FORM)

1
FLL Research Presentation Feedback Form Team Name: _______________________________________________________ Team Number: ____________ This sheet provides feedback to team coaches. It is not a scorecard, but rather an aid to help you and your team. It is your choice whether to share it with the team or not. Only extremes are marked—areas where the team excelled or could use some attention. Note that you may get two copies, if the two judges filled out their own sheets. Remember: “Your critics are your ones telling you they still love you and care.” — Randy Pausch, The Last Lecture, Hyperion 2008 Strengths Weaknesses Research Concise problem statement Ample data Well-cited sources Thorough data analysis Plenty of experts met Problem relevant to FLL Problem personally relevant Alternative views considered Thorough mastery of information/data/problem Problem not well-defined Too broad Too narrow Poor data collection Poor data analysis No expert references Problem not relevant Alternative views ignored Shallow understanding of information/data/problem Solution Innovative Realistic I’d like to have that solution! Uninspired Sharing Well-shared Creatively shared Not shared Limited audience Presentation Well-rehearsed Clear speech Mutual respect among team members Clever presentation style Engaging/fun to watch Interactive Team excited and eager to share Setup too long Hard to follow/rambling Hard to hear presenter(s) Members interrupted each other Too few/many visual aids/props Too long/short Rushed Technical difficulties Team seems bored Teamwork Entire team participated in project Student-only work Cohesive/integrated team Team has fun together Teamwork not evenly divided Adult intervention apparent Few members answered all questions Team of “chiefs” (individuals) Gracious Professionalism Team introductions Team members focused on presenter/judges/discussion Great attitude! No introductions to judges Team members distracted/uninterested Poor attitude Additional comments:

description

This is the feedback form the team will receive from the judges after making their presentation @ the FLL State Championship event.

Transcript of FLL Project Feedback (JUDGE's FORM)

FLL Research Presentation Feedback Form

Team Name: _______________________________________________________ Team Number: ____________

This sheet provides feedback to team coaches. It is not a scorecard, but rather an aid to help you and your team. It is

your choice whether to share it with the team or not. Only extremes are marked—areas where the team excelled or

could use some attention. Note that you may get two copies, if the two judges filled out their own sheets.

Remember: “Your critics are your ones telling you they still love you and care.”

— Randy Pausch, The Last Lecture, Hyperion 2008

Strengths Weaknesses

Research Concise problem statement Ample data Well-cited sources Thorough data analysis Plenty of experts met Problem relevant to FLL Problem personally relevant Alternative views considered Thorough mastery of

information/data/problem

Problem not well-defined Too broad Too narrow

Poor data collection Poor data analysis No expert references Problem not relevant Alternative views ignored Shallow understanding of

information/data/problem

Solution Innovative Realistic I’d like to have that solution!

Uninspired

Sharing Well-shared Creatively shared

Not shared Limited audience

Presentation Well-rehearsed Clear speech Mutual respect among team members Clever presentation style Engaging/fun to watch Interactive Team excited and eager to share

Setup too long Hard to follow/rambling Hard to hear presenter(s) Members interrupted each other Too few/many visual aids/props Too long/short Rushed Technical difficulties Team seems bored

Teamwork Entire team participated in project Student-only work Cohesive/integrated team Team has fun together

Teamwork not evenly divided Adult intervention apparent Few members answered all questions Team of “chiefs” (individuals)

Gracious Professionalism

Team introductions Team members focused on

presenter/judges/discussion Great attitude!

No introductions to judges Team members distracted/uninterested Poor attitude

Additional comments: